A Stable and Fast-Transient Performance Switched-Mode Power Amplifier for a Power Hardware in the Loop (PHIL) System
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Overview of a PHIL System
2.1. Real-Time Simulator
2.2. Power Interface
2.3. Interface Algorithm
2.4. Power Amplifier in a PHIL System
3. Controller for the Rectifier of a PA
- (1)
- Controlling the DC side voltage, thus enabling the PA to be kept within the range required by normal operation;
- (2)
- Guaranteeing the power quality on the DC side and avoiding the effect of a test on the conventional power grid. Thus, the objective of control of the rectifier side of the power interface is consistent with the objective of the control of the rectifier.
3.1. The Dynamics Analysis of DC Bus Voltage under the Disturbance
3.2. A Current Feed-Forward Controller for the Rectifier of a PA
4. Controller for the Inverter Part of a PA
4.1. Active Damping Compensator (ADC)
4.2. Compound Controller
5. Experimental
5.1. DC Voltage Transient Responses Under Load Step Change
5.2. Waveform Analysis for the Dynamic Performance Test
6. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Author Contributions
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Wu, X.; Lentijo, S.; Monti, A. A novel interface for power hardware-in-the-loop simulation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Computers in Power Electronics (COMPEL 2004), Urbana, IL, USA, 15–18 August 2004; pp. 178–182. [Google Scholar]
- Oh, S.; Yoo, C.; Chung, I.; Won, D. Hardware-in-the-loop simulation of distributed intelligent energy management system for Microgrids. Energies 2013, 6, 3263–3283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Shiau, J.; Lee, M.; Wei, Y.; Chen, B. Circuit simulation for solar power maximum power point tracking with different buck-boost converter topologies. Energies 2014, 7, 5027–5046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Calise, F.; Capuano, D.; Vanoli, L. Dynamic simulation and exergo-economic optimization of a hybrid solar-geothermal cogeneration plant. Energies 2015, 8, 2606–2646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Marco, J.; Kumari, N.; Widanage, W.D.; Jones, P. A cell-in-the-loop approach to systems modelling and simulation of energy storage systems. Energies 2015, 8, 8244–8262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Locment, F.; Sechilariu, M. Modeling and simulation of DC microgrids for electric vehicle charging stations. Energies 2015, 8, 4335–4356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dommel, H.W. Digital computer solution of electromagnetic transients in single and multiphase networks. IEEE Trans. Power Appar. Syst. 1969, 88, 734–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ayasun, S.; Vallieu, S.; Fishl, R.; Chmielewski, T. Electric machinery diagnostic/testing system and power hardware-in-the-loop studies. In Proceedings of the 4th IEEE International Symposium on Diagnostics for Electric Machines, Power Electronics and Drives, Atlanta, GA, USA, 24–26 August 2003; pp. 361–366. [Google Scholar]
- Ren, W.; Sloderbeck, M.; Steurer, M.; Dinavahi, V.; Noda, T.; Filizadeh, S.; Chevrefils, A.R.; Matar, M.; Iravani, R.; Dufour, C.; et al. Interfacing issues in real-time digital simulators. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2011, 26, 1221–1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Li, Y.; Vilathgamuwa, D.M.; Loh, P.C. Design, analysis, and real-time testing of a controller for multibus microgrid system. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2004, 19, 1195–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, Y.; Li, H.; Xu, L.; Zhao, X.; Guerrero, J. Analysis of washout filter-based power sharing strategy—An equivalent secondary controller for islanded microgrid without LBC lines. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Parma, G.G.; Dinavahi, V. Real-time digital hardware simulation of power electronics and drives. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2007, 22, 1235–1246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yeo, H.; Kim, H. Hardware-in-the-loop simulation of regenerative braking for a hybrid electric vehicle. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. Part D J. Automob. Eng. 2002, 216, 855–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Guazzelli, P.R.; de Oliveira, C.M.; de Castro, A.G.; Pereira, W.C.; de Aguiar, M.L. Electric vehicle hardware-in-the-loop simulation with differentiator optimised by genetic algorithm. In Proceedings of the 2016 12th IEEE International Conference on Industry Applications (INDUSCON), Curitiba, Brazil, 20–23 November 2016; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
- Bubshait, A.S.; Mortezaei, A.; Simões, M.G.; Busarello, T.D.C. Power quality enhancement for a grid connected wind turbine energy system. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2017, 53, 2495–2505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kezunovic, M.; Esmailian, A.; Govindarasu, M.; Mehrizi-Sani, A. The use of system in the loop, hardware in the loop, and co-modeling of cyber-physical systems in developing and evaluating new smart grid solutions. In Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Waikoloa, HI, USA, 4–7 January 2017. [Google Scholar]
- Mo, R.; Steurer, M.; Li, H. Controller hardware-in-the-loop (CHIL) simulation of a multi-functional energy storage system based on modular multilevel DC/DC converter (M2DC) for MVDC grid. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 8th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (IPEMC-ECCE Asia), Hefei, China, 22–26 May 2016; pp. 1980–1984. [Google Scholar]
- Fathy, H.K.; Filipi, Z.S.; Hagena, J.; Stein, J.L. Review of hardware-in-the-loop simulation and its prospects in the automotive area. Proc. SPIE 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ren, W.; Steurer, M.; Baldwin, T.L. Improve the stability and the accuracy of power hardware-in-the-loop simulation by selecting appropriate interface algorithms. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2008, 44, 1286–1294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wu, X.; Monti, A. Methods for partitioning the system and performance evaluation in power-hardware-in-the-loop simulations—Part I. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Conference of IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON), Raleigh, NC, USA, 6–10 November 2005; p. 6. [Google Scholar]
- Lehfuss, F.; Lauss, G.; Kostampopoulos, P.; Hatziargyriou, N.; Crolla, P.; Roscoe, A. Comparison of multiple power amplification types for power hardware-in-the-loop applications. In Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop Complexity Engineering, Aachen, Germany, 11–13 June 2012; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Lentijo, S.; D’Arco, S.; Monti, A. Comparing the dynamic performances of power hardware-in-the-loop interfaces. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2010, 57, 1195–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dufour, C.; Abourida, S.; Bélanger, J. Hardware-in-the-loop simulation of power drives with RT-LAB. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Power Electronics and Drives Systems (PEDS), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 28 November–1 December 2005; Volume 2, pp. 1646–1651. [Google Scholar]
- Jha, K.; Mishra, S.; Joshi, A. Boost-amplifier-based Power-hardware-in-the-loop simulator. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2015, 62, 7479–7488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, S.; Cui, B.; Zhang, F.; Qian, Z. A robust repetitive control strategy for CVCF inverters with very low harmonic distortion. In Proceedings of the IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference, Anaheim, CA, USA, 25 February–1 March 2007; pp. 1673–1677. [Google Scholar]
- Zhang, K.; Kang, Y.; Xiong, J.; Chen, J. Direct repetitive control of SPWM inverters for UPS purpose. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2003, 18, 784–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tzou, Y.-Y.; Jung, S.-L.; Yeh, H.-C. Adaptive repetitive control of PWM inverters for very low THD AC-voltage regulation with unknown loads. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 1999, 14, 973–981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yang, D.; Ruan, X.; Wu, H. Impedance shaping of the grid-connected inverter with LCL filter to improve its adaptability to the weak grid condition. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2014, 29, 5795–5806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Abdel-Rahim, N.M.; Quaicoe, J.E. Analysis and design of a multiple feedback loop control strategy for single-phase voltage-source UPS inverters. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 1996, 11, 532–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tzou, Y.-Y.; Ou, R.-S.; Jung, S.-L.; Chang, M.-Y. High-performance programmable AC power source with low harmonic distortion using DSP based repetitive control technique. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 1997, 12, 715–725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ryan, M.J.; Lorenz, R.D. High performance sine wave inverter with capacitor current feedback and back-EMF decoupling. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference (PESC), Atlanta, GA, USA, 18–22 June 1995; Volume 1, pp. 507–513. [Google Scholar]
- Castello, R.; Grino, R.; Fossas, E. Odd-harmonic digital repetitive control of a single-phase current active filter. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2004, 19, 1060–1068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Loh, P.C.; Newman, M.J.; Zmood, D.N.; Holmes, D.G. A comparative analysis of multiloop voltage regulation strategies for single and three-phase UPS systems. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2003, 18, 1176–1185. [Google Scholar]
© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Sun, J.; Yin, C.; Gong, J.; Chen, Y.; Liao, Z.; Zha, X. A Stable and Fast-Transient Performance Switched-Mode Power Amplifier for a Power Hardware in the Loop (PHIL) System. Energies 2017, 10, 1569. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10101569
Sun J, Yin C, Gong J, Chen Y, Liao Z, Zha X. A Stable and Fast-Transient Performance Switched-Mode Power Amplifier for a Power Hardware in the Loop (PHIL) System. Energies. 2017; 10(10):1569. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10101569
Chicago/Turabian StyleSun, Jianjun, Chenxu Yin, Jinwu Gong, Yewei Chen, Zhiqiang Liao, and Xiaoming Zha. 2017. "A Stable and Fast-Transient Performance Switched-Mode Power Amplifier for a Power Hardware in the Loop (PHIL) System" Energies 10, no. 10: 1569. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10101569