Burnout and Health Issues among Prehospital Personnel in Taiwan Fire Departments during a Sudden Spike in Community COVID-19 Cases: A Cross-Sectional Study
Department of Health Promotion and Health Education, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei City 106, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(4), 2257; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042257
Submission received: 27 January 2022
/
Revised: 14 February 2022
/
Accepted: 15 February 2022
/
Published: 16 February 2022
Abstract
:A spike in COVID-19 cases in Taiwan’s communities caused a significant increase in workload and infection concerns among prehospital personnel working in Taiwan fire departments. The present study was aimed at investigating their health status during this period. The target population was prehospital personnel who are from Taiwan fire departments, and who responded to COVID-19 patients during the community outbreak period. A questionnaire was employed to assess their physical and mental health status. The results showed that prehospital personnel suffered from moderate to severe degrees of burnout. Workload, body burden, and perceived pressure increased significantly during this period. Participants received more support from friends, family, and colleagues than they did from authorities. The paramedics reported higher scores for personal burnout than the emergency medical technicians (EMTs). Compared to non-COVID-19 response units, special COVID-19 response units reported higher scores for workload, body burden, and supportive environment. The results suggested that personal and work-related burnout were associated with higher perceived pressure. This study is the first investigation of physical and mental health burdens among prehospital personnel in Taiwan fire departments during the COVID-19 pandemic. The physical and mental health status of these personnel should be continuously monitored, and intervention provided as necessary.
1. Introduction
The COVID-19 pandemic has been impacting societies around the world since late 2019. In Taiwan, a spike in the number of COVID-19 cases caused a significant increase in the workload of hospital and prehospital healthcare providers in communities between May and September in 2021 [1]. During this period, health and emergency authorities assigned emergency ambulance crews in fire departments to transport patients with unstable COVID-19 conditions to hospitals, whereas minor or asymptomatic cases were transported to quarantine facilities. Emergency ambulance crews comprising emergency medical technicians (EMTs) and paramedics working in fire departments were required to wear full personal protective equipment, and drive ambulances for hours daily to transport COVID-19 patients to minimize the spread of COVID-19 in the community [1]. Some EMTs and paramedics reported suffering from heat-related illness and psychological stress after operating COVID-19 patient transports [1].
Studies have shown that dramatic changes in the work environment, and elevated risk levels in hospital and prehospital settings have induced significant pressure, anxiety, depression, and burnout in healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10]. One study also suggested that building a supportive environment and resilience capability may be beneficial to alleviating stress, anxiety, and pressure during this period [11]. In recent studies, measurements of mental health status were mainly focused on healthcare workers in hospitals. However, health impacts to EMTs and paramedics, who work in environments that pose a high risk of infection and uncertainty, have been underestimated, and require intervention and greater attention from society and relevant authorities [11,12].
Thus, the present study aimed to measure factors related to physical and mental health among EMTs and paramedics in Taiwan fire departments, and investigate the association among these factors during the spike in the number of COVID-19 cases in Taiwanese communities.
2. Materials and Methods
This cross-sectional study was conducted between 2 September and 1 October 2021. The target population was EMTs and paramedics from Taiwan fire departments who responded to transport or care of any patients who tested positive for COVID-19 during a community outbreak since May 2021. Authorities assigned groups of experienced EMTs and paramedics to be responsible for the transportation of patients with COVID-19 in different jurisdictions. At the time of this study, approximately 10,000 frontline EMTs and paramedics were working in Taiwan fire departments [13]. Based on COVID-19 response reports from various fire departments, the estimated size of the target population in this study was 500 (5%) EMTs and paramedics [1].
This study adopted a structured questionnaire to assess the physical and mental health status of EMTs and paramedics. The questionnaire was constructed using Google Forms, and distributed via email and social media communication networks between EMTs and paramedics in different jurisdictions. The present study was reviewed and approved by the Ethical Committee at En Chu Kong Hospital, Taiwan (ECKIRB1100803).
The questionnaire comprised different aspects related to physical and mental health, including 6 sections: demographics and health behavior (smoking, alcohol consumption, and exercise), personal and work-related burnout, workload and body burden, perceived pressure, supportive environment, and expression of thoughts and feelings in this period. This questionnaire was evaluated by experts validity and pre-test that obtained the reliability of Cronbach’s alpha 0.9 and KMO value 0.8.
In completing the questionnaire, the participants retrospectively evaluated their physical and mental status during the community outbreak. The contents in the burnout section were adopted from the Taiwan Ministry of Labor burnout measurement tool, with 6 questions used to measure personal-related burnout, and 7 questions to measure work-related burnout. Personal-related burnout results were interpreted as severe for scores higher than 70, moderate for scores between 50 and 70, and minor for scores below 50; work-related burnout results were interpreted as severe for scores higher than 60, moderate for scores between 45 and 60, and minor for scores below 45 [14].
The other sections exploring mental health-related status included workload and body burden, perceived pressure, and supportive environment. These were measured using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = significant increase, 2 = increase, 3 = no difference, 4 = decrease, 5 = significant decrease). Scores for these sections were re-calculated into a scale from 0 to 100. The average scores in each section were taken to reflect the degree of mental status among the participants. The final section was an open-ended question for participants to express their thoughts, experiences, and feelings during the spike in community cases.
Continuous variables were described using the mean and standard deviation (SD). Categorical variables were presented as frequencies and percentages. The mean comparison of continuous variables between groups was computed with Student’s t test and an analysis of variance (ANOVA). Correlations between continuous variables were analyzed using Pearson’s coefficient and the chi-squared test. Linear regression was conducted to investigate the effects of demographics, health behavior, and mental health-related status on personal and work-related burnout scores. Path analysis was also conducted to demonstrate the degree of association between the variables. For all results, p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Analyses were performed using SPSS 23 and LISREL 8.8 statistical software.
3. Results
3.1. Participant Characteristics
Table 1 summarized the demographic data of the participants. The sample comprised 187 participants from Taiwan fire departments; 173 (92.5%) were male, and 14 (7.5%) were female. Their mean age was 35.4 (±6.5) years, and average work experience was 11.8 (±6.8) years. The average number of dependents among the participants was 2.1 (±1.3). There were 118 (63.1%) participants who were married, 66 (35.3%) who were unmarried, and 3 (1.6%) who were divorced. Regarding education level, 76 (40.6%) held an undergraduate degree, 44 (23.5%) had completed a postgraduate degree, and 67 (35.8%) held a diploma degree. Of all participants, 112 (59.9%) were paramedics, and 75 (40.1%) were EMTs.
Regarding the participants’ jurisdiction, 93 (49.8%) of the participants were from COVID-19 response units, and 94 (50.2%) were from non-COVID-19 response units. Of all EMTs and paramedics in this study, 73 (39%) were from New Taipei City, 31 (16.6%) were from Taichung City, 21 (11.2%) were from Kaohsiung City, 13 (7%) were from Hsinchu City, 12 (6.4%) were from Tainan City, 11 (5.9%) were from Taipei City, 8 (4.3%) were from Taoyuan City, 6 (3.2%) were from Hsinchu County, and 12 (6.4%) were from other jurisdictions in Taiwan. Regarding financial status, 9 (4.8%) participants reported living below the poverty line, 151 (80.7%) were middle class, and 27 (14.4%) were in the upper class. Regarding religious beliefs, 101 (54%) were without a specific religion, 25 (13.4%) were Buddhist, 48 (25.7%) were Taoist, 8 (4.3%) were Christian, and 5 (2.7%) followed other religions.
This study investigated health-related behaviors, including smoking, drinking, and exercise. The results showed that 156 (83.4%) were non-smokers, 14 (7.5%) smoked <1 pack of cigarettes per week, 12 (6.4%) smoked 1–2 packs per week, and 5 (2.7%) smoked >1 pack per day. Regarding their alcohol consumption habits, 63 (33.7%) of the participants reported no habit, 113 (60.4%) drink alcohol occasionally, and 11 (5.9%) drink more than 3 times per week. For exercise habits, 36 (19.3%) of the participants reported that they had no exercise habit, 100 (53.5%) exercised 1–2 times per week, and 51 (27.3%) of them exercised more than 3 times per week.
The average scores obtained from the questions in each section were used to reflect the status of each variable related to mental health. Table 2 lists the mean and SD for each variable. The average personal burnout score was 55.9 (±22.4), and for work-related burnout, was 51.3 (±22.0). The burnout scores indicated that EMTs and paramedics from Taiwan fire departments were suffering at least a moderate level of burnout during the investigation period. Workload, body burden, and perceived pressure scores were 83.1 (±11.2), 64.7 (±6.5), and 72.6 (±13.4), respectively, including a moderate-to-significant increase in these areas during the study period. The scores for supportive environment reflected a moderate increase during this period.
3.2. Characteristics and Mental Health-Related Status
The scores for mental health status differed between the characteristics (Table 3). Paramedics revealed higher personal burnout scores than those at the EMT-2 level (58.5 vs. 52.0, p < 0.05). Special COVID-19 response units showed higher scores in workload (84.4 vs. 82.6, p < 0.05), body burden (66.2 vs. 63.8, p < 0.05), and supportive environment (70.9 vs. 69.5, p < 0.05) than non-COVID-19 response units. Participants whose jurisdiction was in New Taipei City showed a significantly greater workload (85.9 vs. 78.3, p < 0.05) and supportive environment (72.9 vs. 65.2, p < 0.05) than those in Taichung City. Participants below the poverty line reported higher scores for work-related burnout (67.4 vs. 44.9, p < 0.05) and perceived pressure (81.2 vs. 68.0, p < 0.05) than those who were upper class. Body burden and perceived pressure scores among those who reported consuming alcohol occasionally were higher than those who did not habitually consume alcohol (65.6 vs. 62.8). Participants who exercised 1–2 times per week had significantly higher scores in personal-related burnout (61.2 vs. 47.3, p < 0.05), work-related burnout (56.5 vs. 42.7, p < 0.05), and perceived pressure (75.6 vs. 68.7, p < 0.05) in comparison to those who exercised 3 times per week.
3.3. Association of Burnout and Observed Factors
Two linear regressions were calculated to predict personal and work-related burnout based on the demographic variables and scores for workload, body burden, perceived pressure, and supportive environment (Table 4). For predicting the personal-related burnout score, a significant regression equation was found ((F(13, 173) = 70.31, p < 0.001); R2 = 0.841). Participants’ predicted personal-related burnout was equal to −32.35 to 0.42 (work experience) + 0.19 (workload) + 0.83 (work-related burnout). Participants’ personal-related burnout decreased by 0.42 for each year of work experience, and increased by 0.19 and 0.83 for each degree of workload and work-related burnout. In the prediction for work-related burnout, a significant regression equation was found (F(22, 164) = 43.07, p < 0.001); R2 = 0.852). Participants’ predicted personal-related burnout was equal to 10.36 + 0.25 (perceived pressure) + 0.77 (personal-related burnout). Participants’ work-related burnout increased by 0.25 and 0.77 for each degree of pressure and personal-related burnout.
Figure 1 displays the results of the initial path analysis model of work-related variables affecting personal and work-related burnout. The goodness-of-fit resulted a chi-squared of 4.145 (p = 0.387) with degrees of freedom of 4. The goodness-of-fit index (GFI) was 0.993, and the adjusted GFI was 0.963. Fit indices, such as comparative fit index (CFI), normal fit index (NFI), and relative fit index (RFI), were all over 0.9 in acceptance level. This path analysis showed that personal burnout was directly affected by workload (0.35), body burden (−0.82), and perceived pressure (0.80). Work-related burnout was directly affected by workload (0.26), perceived pressure (0.85), body burden (−0.79), and supportive environment (−0.06). From the results above, perceived pressure affected both personal-related and work-related burnout compared to other work-related variables. Body burden produced negative effects to both personal-related and work-related burnout. The effect of body burden to personal burnout was also mediated by perceived pressure. The effect of body burden to work-related burnout was mediated by a supportive environment.
3.4. Qualitative Feedback from Participants
There were 96 participants who responded to the open-ended question in the questionnaire. By excluding emotional expressions, there were 40 responses that identified specific issues during this sudden spike in community COVID-19 cases. A lack of personal protective equipment decontamination supply occupied 22 responses. There were 15 responses that highlighted the situation of lack of rest time during this period. There were three responses that described the situation of perceived pressure from supervisors or authorities.
4. Discussion
Only a few studies have investigated the mental health condition of EMTs and paramedics, which may contribute to the worsening physical and mental condition among prehospital healthcare workers being underestimated [1,11,12]. The present study assessed EMTs and paramedics in terms of perceived pressure, workload, physical burden, and burnout status compared to these conditions before the recent COVID-19 community outbreak in Taiwan. The increase in workload and the physical burden was found to be associated with an increase in burnout and perceived pressure among EMTs and paramedics in Taiwan. These results may provide a warning for EMTs and paramedics, in that this could also further compromise their well-being, as well as the safety of patients and the quality of care given to the patients during this period. As this pandemic lasted for more than 2 years, EMTs and paramedics have been exposed to a certain degree of pressure, burnout, fatigue, and other physical and mental health conditions. This situation may become a public health concern that needs to be addressed by relevant authorities.
Healthcare providers around the world have been experiencing various levels of perceived pressure, anxiety, depression, burnout, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) during the COVID-19 outbreak since late 2019 [2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,15,16,17,18,19]. Although the situation in Taiwan has not been as severe as in other countries, the present study still detected an increase in perceived pressure, physical and mental burden, and burnout among Taiwan prehospital healthcare providers. The total case load and the length of the outbreak period may be associated with the level of mental stress among health care workers [4,18]. The peak of the outbreak in communities in Taiwan was almost 5 months in length, and this might not allow for a clear observation of the negative effects experienced by EMTs and paramedics, at least not to the extent that it can be confirmed that their health has been significantly compromised, or that they have developed PTSD. However, the results of this study still suggest that relevant authorities in Taiwan should commence monitoring the physical and mental health status of EMTs and paramedics, and prepare long-term prevention and intervention programs for them.
Throughout this pandemic, health-care workers have been working in an environment that is high in risk, uncertainty, and stress [2,3,8,15]. Many studies have suggested that it is important to establish a supportive work environment for healthcare workers to relieve pressure and stress [5,10,15,16,18]. In the present investigation, family, friends, and colleagues were the main sources of support for EMTs and paramedics during the community outbreak, which previous studies have also indicated. However, the results indicated the opposite concerning the support EMTs and paramedics have received from relevant authorities. From the qualitative results, the EMTs and paramedics reported that their pressure and stress were from authorities, primarily due to a lack of PPE, and the authorities not considering their fatigue levels in their response planning. Many responses from the participants also highlighted that EMTs and paramedics are not recognized as health-care professionals in Taiwan, resulting in resources not being fairly distributed compared to other health care professionals during this public health crisis. This became a trust issue for both prehospital care providers and their authorities. The authorities should thus consider including EMTs and paramedics as a part of the healthcare system, instead of classifying them only as emergency and rescue responders.
The open-ended question in the questionnaire was aimed at allowing the participants to express more about their thoughts and feelings during the community outbreak. Most of the responses expressed negative thoughts and feelings about the outbreak, including their fatigue and fears, and the misleading message from their authorities to the media. EMTs and paramedics work in an uncertain environment that brings them into contact with potential COVID-19 cases without early notification. Feelings of pressure, stress, anxiety and even anger from EMTs and paramedics in Taiwan were foreseeable under this circumstance. Based on this atmosphere among prehospital care providers, the participants also reported that they have been re-evaluating their roles and the meaning of being an EMT and paramedic in Taiwan’s fire departments. In addition, when the community infection became under control, the authorities started to require faster ambulance response times, which shortened the time responders had to properly equip PPE, and may compromise personal health, and be in breach of relevant safety policies. The control and prevention of EMTs and paramedics being infected during the COVID-19 pandemic should always be the primary consideration compared to other daily routines key performance indicators (KPIs), such as 90 s for gear-up and drive-out, as these standards were implemented before the outbreak [15,18]. Also, being assigned a lower priority for being vaccinated and receiving relevant compensation could place severe strain on the trust between prehospital care providers and their authorities.
A limitation of this study was that it focused on a narrow sample. The study can be considered a pilot study for investigating the current physical and mental condition of EMTs and paramedics working with fire departments in Taiwan. Emergency medical services also include private ambulance services, prehospital nurses, as well as physicians and nurses in emergency departments. In the future, target samples following this line of research should include all frontline emergency healthcare workers to build up a comprehensive understanding of how their physical and mental health status has been impacted by COVID-19.
5. Conclusions
This study is the first investigation of the physical and mental health burden of EMTs and paramedics in Taiwan’s fire departments during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results revealed an increase in perceived pressure, burnout, and health burden among those who have been responding to highly contagious patients in the community. Society and the authorities must provide continuous support to prehospital care providers who are risking their lives to serve the community during this pandemic. Their physical and mental health status should be continuously monitored, and interventions should be provided where necessary.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, Y.-T.C. and Y.-J.H.; methodology, Y.-T.C. and Y.-J.H.; software, Y.-T.C.; validation, Y.-T.C. and Y.-J.H.; formal analysis, Y.-T.C.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.-T.C.; writing—review and editing, Y.-T.C.; supervision, Y.-J.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research received no external funding.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The present study was reviewed and approved by the Ethical Committee at En Chu Kong Hospital, Taiwan (ECKIRB1100803).
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets will be available on reasonable request from the first author.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank all the EMTs and paramedics who contributed their time, thoughts, and experiences to this study.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Chang, Y.T.; Chen, G.; Tang, C. Countermeasures for EMS personnel to reduce heat stress when wearing PPE during COVID-19 pandemic. J. Paramed. Emerg. Response 2021, 2, 6–12. [Google Scholar]
- Buselli, R.; Corsi, M.; Baldanzi, S.; Chiumiento, M.; Del Lupo, E.; Dell’Oste, V.; Bertelloni, C.A.; Massimetti, G.; Dell’Osso, L.; Cristaudo, A.; et al. Professional Quality of Life and Mental Health Outcomes among Health Care Workers Exposed to SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19). Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- De Brier, N.; Stroobants, S.; Vandekerckhove, P.; De Buck, E. Factors affecting mental health of health care workers during coronavirus disease outbreaks (SARS, MERS & COVID-19): A rapid systematic review. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0244052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pappa, S.; Barnett, J.; Berges, I.; Sakkas, N. Tired, Worried and Burned Out, but Still Resilient: A Cross-Sectional Study of Mental Health Workers in the UK during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 4457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Kisely, S.; Warren, N.; McMahon, L.; Dalais, C.; Henry, I.; Siskind, D. Occurrence, prevention, and management of the psychological effects of emerging virus outbreaks on healthcare workers: Rapid review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2020, 369, m1642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- ElGindi, H.; Shalaby, R.; Gusnowski, A.; Vuong, W.; Surood, S.; Hrabok, M.; Greenshaw, A.J.; Agyapong, V. Mental health impact of COVID-19 pandemic among physicians, nurses, and other healthcare providers, in the province of Alberta (Preprint). JMIR Form. Res. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vanhaecht, K.; Seys, D.; Bruyneel, L.; Cox, B.; Kaesemans, G.; Cloet, M.; Broeck, K.V.D.; Cools, O.; De Witte, A.; Lowet, K.; et al. COVID-19 is having a destructive impact on health-care workers’ mental well-being. Int. J. Qual. Health Care 2021, 33, mzaa158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wong, L.P.; Hung, C.-C.; Alias, H.; Lee, T.S.-H. Anxiety symptoms and preventive measures during the COVID-19 outbreak in Taiwan. BMC Psychiatry 2020, 20, 376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Robles, R.; Rodríguez, E.; Vega-Ramírez, H.; Álvarez-Icaza, D.; Madrigal, E.; Durand, S.; Morales-Chainé, S.; Astudillo, C.; Real-Ramírez, J.; Medina-Mora, M.-E.; et al. Mental health problems among healthcare workers involved with the COVID-19 outbreak. Rev. Bras. Psiquiatr. 2021, 43, 494–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Evanoff, B.A.; Strickland, J.R.; Dale, A.M.; Hayibor, L.; Page, E.; Duncan, J.G.; Kannampallil, T.; Gray, D.L. Work-Related and Personal Factors Associated with Mental Well-Being During the COVID-19 Response: Survey of Health Care and Other Workers. J. Med. Internet Res. 2020, 22, e21366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Awais, S.B.; Martins, R.S.; Khan, M.S. Paramedics in pandemics: Protecting the mental wellness of those behind enemy lines. Br. J. Psychiatry 2021, 218, 75–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Buick, J.E.; Cheskes, S.; Feldman, M.; Verbeek, P.R.; Hillier, M.; Leong, Y.C.; Drennan, I.R. COVID-19: What paramedics need to know. Can. J. Emerg. Med. 2020, 22, 426–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- National Fire Agency of Taiwan. 2020 Total Number of EMTs in Fire Departments in Taiwan. 2020. Available online: https://www.nfa.gov.tw/cht/index.php?code=list&flag=detail&ids=221&article_id=9543 (accessed on 31 August 2021).
- Yeh, W.Y.; Cheng, Y.; Chen, C.J.; Hu, P.; Kristensen, T.S. Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Copenhagan Burnout Inventory among Taiwanese employees from two enterprises. Int. J. Behav. Med. 2007, 14, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Feng, M.-C.; Wu, H.-C.; Lin, H.-T.; Lei, L.; Chao, C.-L.; Lu, C.-M.; Yang, W.-P. Exploring the Stress, Psychological Distress, and Stress-relief Strategies of Taiwan Nursing Staffs Facing the Global Outbreak of COVID-19. Hu Li Za Zhi J. Nurs. 2020, 67, 64–74. [Google Scholar]
- Fernandez, R.; Lord, H.; Halcomb, E.; Moxham, L.; Middleton, R.; Alananzeh, I.; Ellwood, L. Implications for COVID-19: A systematic review of nurses’ experiences of working in acute care hospital settings during a respiratory pandemic. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2020, 111, 103637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vindegaard, N.; Benros, M.E. COVID-19 pandemic and mental health consequences: Systematic review of the current evidence. Brain Behav. Immun. 2020, 89, 531–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Pappa, S.; Athanasiou, N.; Sakkas, N.; Patrinos, S.; Sakka, E.; Barmparessou, Z.; Tsikrika, S.; Adraktas, A.; Pataka, A.; Migdalis, I.; et al. From Recession to Depression? Prevalence and Correlates of Depression, Anxiety, Traumatic Stress and Burnout in Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Greece: A Multi-Center, Cross-Sectional Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 2390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Lovreglio, P.; Leso, V.; Riccardi, E.; Stufano, A.; Pacella, D.; Cagnazzo, F.; Ercolano, M.L.; Iavicoli, I. Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Pandemic: The Psychological Well-Being in a Cohort of Workers of a Multinational Company. Saf. Health Work 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1.
Path analysis diagram and standardized coefficients of burnout and work-related health issues of prehospital personnel.
Figure 1.
Path analysis diagram and standardized coefficients of burnout and work-related health issues of prehospital personnel.
Table 1.
Demographic data of the participants, shown as frequencies and percentages. (n = 187).
| Characteristics | Frequency (%) | Mean ± SD |
|---|---|---|
| Age | 35.4 ± 6.5 | |
| Working experience (years) | 11.8 ± 6.8 | |
| Number of dependents | 2.1 ± 1.3 | |
| Gender | ||
| Male | 173 (92.5) | |
| Female | 14 (7.5) | |
| Marriage | ||
| Not married | 66 (35.3) | |
| Married | 118 (63.1) | |
| Divorced | 3 (1.6) | |
| Education | ||
| Diploma | 67 (35.8) | |
| Undergraduate | 76 (40.6) | |
| Postgraduate | 44 (23.5) | |
| EMTs Level | ||
| EMTs-2 | 112 (59.9) | |
| Paramedic | 75 (40.1) | |
| Service Unit | ||
| COVID-19 response units | 93 (49.8) | |
| Non-COVID-19 response units | 94 (50.2) | |
| Jurisdictions | ||
| New Taipei City | 73 (39.0) | |
| Taichung City | 31 (16.6) | |
| Kaohsiung City | 21 (11.2) | |
| Hsinchu City | 13 (7.0) | |
| Tainan City | 12 (6.4) | |
| Taipei City | 11 (5.9) | |
| Taoyuan City | 8 (4.3) | |
| Hsinchu County | 6 (3.2) | |
| Others | 12 (6.4) | |
| Financial status | ||
| Below the poverty line | 9 (4.8) | |
| Middle class | 151 (80.7) | |
| Upper class | 27 (14.4) | |
| Religion | ||
| No religion | 101 (54.0) | |
| Buddhist | 25 (13.4) | |
| Taoist | 48 (25.7) | |
| Christian | 8 (4.3) | |
| Others | 5 (2.7) | |
| Smoking habit | … | |
| Non-smoker | 156 (83.4) | |
| Less than 1 pack per week | 14 (7.5) | |
| 1–2 packs per week | 12 (6.4) | |
| More than 1 pack per day | 5 (2.7) | |
| Alcohol consumption habit | … | |
| No drinking habit | 63 (33.7) | |
| Drink occasionally | 113 (60.4) | |
| Drink more than 3 times per week | 11 (5.9) | |
| Exercise habit | ||
| No exercise habit | 36 (19.3) | |
| 1–2 times per week | 100 (53.5) | |
| More than 3 times per week | 51 (27.3) |
Table 2.
Mental health-related variables, given as the mean and SD.
| Variables | Mean ± SD |
|---|---|
| Personal-related burnout | 55.9 ± 22.4 |
| Work-related burnout | 51.3 ± 22.0 |
| Workload | 83.1 ± 11.2 |
| Body burden | 64.7 ± 6.5 |
| Perceived pressure | 72.6 ± 13.4 |
| Supportive environment | 69.7 ± 11.5 |
Table 3.
Comparison of mental health-related scores within characteristic groups.
| Variables | n | Workload | p | Body Burden | p | Personal Burnout | p | Work Burnout | p | Perceived Pressure | p | Supportive Environment | p |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gender | |||||||||||||
| Male | 173 | 83.17 ± 11.4 | 0.742 | 64.8 ± 6.6 | 0.617 | 56.6 ± 21.8 | 0.149 | 51.9 ± 21.5 | 0.189 | 72.9 ± 13.5 | 0.383 | 70.0 ± 11.4 | 0.249 |
| Female | 14 | 82.1 ± 9.5 | 63.8 ± 6.2 | 47.6 ± 28.1 | 43.8 ± 26.7 | 69.6 ± 11.6 | 66.3 ± 11.8 | ||||||
| Marriage | |||||||||||||
| Not married | 66 | 84.4 ± 9.3 | 0.456 | 64.1 ± 4.8 | 0.619 | 53.3 ± 22.3 | 0.303 | 48.5 ± 21.3 | 0.096 | 71.0 ± 10.8 | 0.088 | 67.3 ± 11.8 | 0.088 |
| Married | 118 | 82.4 ± 12.2 | 65.1 ± 7.4 | 57.6 ± 22.3 | 53.3 ± 22.0 | 73.9 ± 14.4 | 70.9 ± 11.2 | ||||||
| Divorced | 3 | 80.0 ± 8.8 | 64.8 ± 5.5 | 44.4 ± 20.9 | 30.9 ± 26.8 | 59.6 ± 14.4 | 74.8 ± 5.1 | ||||||
| Education | |||||||||||||
| Diploma | 67 | 85.3 ± 9.8 | 0.093 | 64.5 ± 6.0 | 0.136 | 56.5 ± 19.4 | 0.608 | 52.8 ± 17.5 | 0.398 | 73.2 ± 10.9 | 0.335 | 69.9 ± 9.7 | 0.366 |
| Undergraduate | 76 | 81.2 ± 12.7 | 65.7 ± 6.8 | 57.1 ± 22.8 | 52.2 ± 23.6 | 73.6 ± 14.7 | 68.5 ± 11.7 | ||||||
| Postgraduate | 44 | 82.8 ± 10.3 | 63.3 ± 6.7 | 53.0 ± 25.8 | 47.4 ± 25.0 | 70.0 ± 14.4 | 71.6 ± 13.3 | ||||||
| EMTs level | |||||||||||||
| (1) EMTs-2 | 112 | 83.8 ± 11.4 | 0.257 | 64.8 ± 6.9 | 0.846 | 58.5 ± 22.9 | 0.048 * (1) > (2) | 53.3 ± 21.5 | 0.118 | 74.2 ± 13.0 | 0.055 | 70.1 ± 10.8 | 0.572 |
| (2) Paramedic | 75 | 81.9 ± 11.0 | 64.6 ± 6.0 | 52.0 ± 21.1 | 48.2 ± 22.3 | 70.3 ± 13.6 | 69.1 ± 12.4 | ||||||
| Service units | |||||||||||||
| (1) COVID-19 Units | 93 | 84.4 ± 10.1 | 0.008 * (1) > (2) | 66.2 ± 6.45 | 0.002 * (1) > (2) | 56.6 ± 21.0 | 0.113 | 51.4 ± 21.4 | 0.299 | 72.4 ± 13.1 | 0.112 | 70.9 ± 11.7 | 0.017 * (1) > (2) |
| (2) Non- COVID-19 Units | 94 | 82.6 ± 10.5 | 63.8 ± 9.0 | 56.7 ± 22.4 | 52.4 ± 21.7 | 73.9 ± 13.1 | 69.5 ± 10.3 | ||||||
| Jurisdictions | |||||||||||||
| (1) New Taipei City | 73 | 85.9 ± 9.1 | 0.004 * (1) > (2) (6) > (5) | 65.7 ± 6.9 | 0.130 | 58.9 ± 21.4 | 0.393 | 54.2 ± 22.2 | 0.758 | 73.2 ± 14.8 | 0.345 | 72.9 ± 10.3 | 0.002 * (1) > (2) (1) > (4) |
| (2) Taichung City | 31 | 78.3 ± 13.6 | 62.2 ± 5.4 | 50.8 ± 25.7 | 48.7 ± 21.7 | 69.1 ± 14.5 | 65.2 ± 11.5 | ||||||
| (3) Kaohsiung City | 21 | 83.0 ± 11.7 | 65.0 ± 5.5 | 59.1 ± 21.2 | 52.0 ± 22.0 | 77.3 ± 12.0 | 69.4 ± 12.1 | ||||||
| (4) Hsinchu City | 13 | 79.2 ± 10.3 | 64.1 ± 3.8 | 43.9 ± 17.1 | 43.4 ± 19.2 | 67.5 ± 8.1 | 61.5 ± 11.9 | ||||||
| (5) Tainan City | 12 | 75.0 ± 13.6 | 63.0 ± 4.7 | 61.1 ± 24.1 | 56.5 ± 21.4 | 78.2 ± 12.4 | 64.2 ± 8.5 | ||||||
| (6) Taipei City | 11 | 90.0 ± 9.7 | 68.5 ± 8.8 | 57.9 ± 22.6 | 47.0 ± 25.3 | 71.2 ± 14.9 | 73.1 ± 16.3 | ||||||
| (7) Taoyuan City | 8 | 83.3 ± 9.7 | 64.0 ± 6.5 | 50.0 ± 31.9 | 46.4 ± 31.1 | 73.3 ± 9.9 | 72.5 ± 6.4 | ||||||
| (8) Hsinchu County | 6 | 85.0 ± 4.0 | 66.3 ± 7.5 | 54.1 ± 12.3 | 52.9 ± 12.8 | 71.5 ± 7.9 | 76.6 ± 10.0 | ||||||
| (9) Others | 12 | 83.0 ± 13.5 | 62.8 ± 8.4 | 56.2 ± 19.5 | 48.8 ± 19.6 | 71.9 ± 10.1 | 68.8 ± 8.3 | ||||||
| Financial status | |||||||||||||
| (1) Below the poverty line | 9 | 78.5 ± 16.9 | 0.183 | 65.0 ± 10.3 | 0.709 | 66.6 ± 28.3 | 0.101 | 67.4 ± 25.2 | 0.028 * (1) > (3) | 81.2 ± 13.8 | 0.031 * (1) > (3) | 71.1 ± 14.0 | 0.698 |
| (2) Middle class | 151 | 83.8 ± 10.8 | 64.9 ± 6.0 | 56.5 ± 21.7 | 51.49 ± 21.0 | 73.0 ± 12.6 | 69.4 ± 11.8 | ||||||
| (3) Upper class | 27 | 80.6 ± 11.0 | 63.7 ± 8.0 | 49.2 ± 23.1 | 44.9 ± 24.2 | 68.0 ± 16.0 | 71.2 ± 8.7 | ||||||
| Religion | |||||||||||||
| No religion | 101 | 82.4 ± 11.5 | 0.643 | 64.5 ± 7.1 | 0.304 | 54.6 ± 21.5 | 0.065 | 50.4 ± 22.2 | 0.072 | 71.4 ± 13.9 | 0.054 | 70.1 ± 10.3 | 0.146 |
| Buddhist | 25 | 83.0 ± 10.5 | 64.0 ± 4.8 | 49.8 ± 18.1 | 45.0 ± 18.4 | 68.7 ± 9.0 | 73.9 ± 13.5 | ||||||
| Taoism | 48 | 84.3 ± 11.7 | 64.9 ± 6.4 | 61.6 ± 23.8 | 56.5 ± 20.9 | 77.0 ± 13.8 | 67.8 ± 12.2 | ||||||
| Christian | 8 | 80.8 ± 8.8 | 64.5 ± 2.7 | 47.9 ± 29.4 | 41.9 ± 28.1 | 71.2 ± 10.1 | 68.3 ± 8.1 | ||||||
| Others | 5 | 88.6 ± 9.3 | 70.9 ± 4.6 | 71.6 ± 20.7 | 65.7 ± 23.2 | 78.6 ± 13.2 | 62.6 ± 16.9 | ||||||
| Smoking habit | |||||||||||||
| Non-smoker | 156 | 83.0 ± 11.3 | 0.608 | 64.6 ± 6.6 | 0.774 | 55.8 ± 22.5 | 0.480 | 51.6 ± 22.0 | 0.217 | 72.2 ± 13.6 | 0.394 | 69.6 ± 11.2 | 0.505 |
| Less than 1 pack per week | 14 | 82.3 ± 11.2 | 64.1 ± 6.1 | 54.7 ± 21.4 | 49.7 ± 21.9 | 75.6 ± 12.9 | 68.4 ± 16.7 | ||||||
| 1–2 packs per week | 12 | 86.3 ± 10.7 | 66.3 ± 6.8 | 52.7 ± 22.0 | 42.8 ± 20.9 | 77.4 ± 11.8 | 74.0 ± 8.2 | ||||||
| More than 1 pack per day | 5 | 78.6 ± 13.2 | 66.1 ± 8.1 | 70.8 ± 21.2 | 67.1 ± 20.4 | 68.0 ± 7.8 | 66.2 ± 5.7 | ||||||
| Alcohol consumption habit | |||||||||||||
| No drinking habit | 63 | 84.0 ± 11.6 | 0.251 | 62.8 ± 6.8 | 0.022 * | 52.5 ± 24.3 | 0.319 | 47.9 ± 24.2 | 0.320 | 69.6 ± 14.0 | 0.039 * | 70.6 ± 10.6 | 0.503 |
| Drink occasionally | 113 | 83.0 ± 10.6 | 65.6 ± 6.2 | 57.8 ± 21.2 | 53.1 ± 20.9 | 74.7 ± 13.1 | 69.0 ± 12.1 | ||||||
| Drink more than 3 times per week | 11 | 77.8 ± 15.0 | 65.9 ± 6.8 | 56.0 ± 21.4 | 51.2 ± 18.2 | 69.6 ± 8.2 | 72.3 ± 9.2 | ||||||
| Exercise habit | |||||||||||||
| (1) No exercise habit | 36 | 82.5 ± 12.8 | 0.762 | 65.0 ± 7.0 | 0.200 | 53.4 ± 21.1 | 0.001 * (2) > (3) | 48.9 ± 22.7 | 0.001 * (2) > (3) | 70.1 ± 12.9 | 0.005 * (2) > (3) | 70.0 ± 10.3 | 0.703 |
| (2) 1–2 times per week | 100 | 83.6 ± 11.1 | 65.3 ± 6.9 | 61.2 ± 21.7 | 56.5 ± 20.2 | 75.6 ± 13.3 | 69.1 ± 12.5 | ||||||
| (3) More than 3 times per week | 51 | 51 ± 82.3 | 63.3 ± 5.3 | 47.3 ± 21.9 | 42.7 ± 22.2 | 68.7 ± 12.7 | 70.8 ± 10.1 |
* p < 0.05.
Table 4.
Multiple linear regression results for personal and work-related burnout.
| Dependent Variable | Personal Burnout | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Independent Variable | Coefficient | Standardized Coefficient | T | p Value | |
| B | SE | β | |||
| Constant | −32.35 | 12.39 | |||
| Work experience | −0.42 | 0.19 | −0.13 | −2.15 | 0.03 |
| Workload | 0.19 | 0.07 | 0.09 | 2.68 | 0.008 |
| Work-related burnout | 0.83 | 0.04 | 0.82 | 17.30 | <0.001 |
| Dependent Variable | Work-Related Burnout | ||||
| Independent Variable | Coefficient | Standardized Coefficient | T | p Value | |
| B | SE | β | |||
| Constant | 10.36 | 12.12 | |||
| Perceived pressure | 0.25 | 0.07 | 0.15 | 3.43 | 0.001 |
| Personal burnout | 0.77 | 0.04 | 0.78 | 17.30 | <0.001 |
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Chang, Y.-T.; Hu, Y.-J. Burnout and Health Issues among Prehospital Personnel in Taiwan Fire Departments during a Sudden Spike in Community COVID-19 Cases: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19, 2257. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042257
AMA Style
Chang Y-T, Hu Y-J. Burnout and Health Issues among Prehospital Personnel in Taiwan Fire Departments during a Sudden Spike in Community COVID-19 Cases: A Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2022; 19(4):2257. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042257
Chicago/Turabian StyleChang, Yu-Tung, and Yih-Jin Hu. 2022. "Burnout and Health Issues among Prehospital Personnel in Taiwan Fire Departments during a Sudden Spike in Community COVID-19 Cases: A Cross-Sectional Study" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 4: 2257. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042257
APA StyleChang, Y.-T., & Hu, Y.-J. (2022). Burnout and Health Issues among Prehospital Personnel in Taiwan Fire Departments during a Sudden Spike in Community COVID-19 Cases: A Cross-Sectional Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(4), 2257. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19042257
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
