Next Article in Journal
Perceived Facilitators and Barriers to Nigerian Nurses’ Engagement in Health Promoting Behaviors: A Socio-Ecological Model Approach
Next Article in Special Issue
Towards More Sustainable Food Systems—14 Lessons Learned
Previous Article in Journal
Molecular Diversity of ESBL-Producing Escherichia coli from Foods of Animal Origin and Human Patients
Previous Article in Special Issue
Rome, a Policy without Politics: The Participatory Process for a Metropolitan Scale Food Policy
Article

Food System Transformation: Integrating a Political–Economy and Social–Ecological Approach to Regime Shifts

1
Centre for Complex Systems in Transition, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch 7600, South Africa
2
Centre for Food Policy, City University of London, London EC1V 0HB, UK
3
Stockholm Resilience Centre, Stockholm University, 106 91 Stockholm, Sweden
4
Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development, Utrecht University, 3584 CB Utrecht, The Netherlands
5
Center for European Integration Research, University of Bonn, 53113 Bonn, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(4), 1313; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041313
Received: 12 January 2020 / Revised: 6 February 2020 / Accepted: 13 February 2020 / Published: 18 February 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Towards More Sustainable Food Systems)
Sustainably achieving the goal of global food security is one of the greatest challenges of the 21st century. The current food system is failing to meet the needs of people, and at the same time, is having far-reaching impacts on the environment and undermining human well-being in other important ways. It is increasingly apparent that a deep transformation in the way we produce and consume food is needed in order to ensure a more just and sustainable future. This paper uses the concept of regime shifts to understand key drivers and innovations underlying past disruptions in the food system and to explore how they may help us think about desirable future changes and how we might leverage them. We combine two perspectives on regime shifts—one derived from natural sciences and the other from social sciences—to propose an interpretation of food regimes that draws on innovation theory. We use this conceptualization to discuss three examples of innovations that we argue helped enable critical regime shifts in the global food system in the past: the Haber-Bosch process of nitrogen fixation, the rise of the supermarket, and the call for more transparency in the food system to reconnect consumers with their food. This paper concludes with an exploration of why this combination of conceptual understandings is important across the Global North/ Global South divide, and proposes a new sustainability regime where transformative change is spearheaded by a variety of social–ecological innovations. View Full-Text
Keywords: food systems; global food regimes; innovation; political–economy; social–ecological systems; transformation; regime shifts; resilience food systems; global food regimes; innovation; political–economy; social–ecological systems; transformation; regime shifts; resilience
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Pereira, L.M.; Drimie, S.; Maciejewski, K.; Tonissen, P.B.; Biggs, R. Food System Transformation: Integrating a Political–Economy and Social–Ecological Approach to Regime Shifts. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1313. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041313

AMA Style

Pereira LM, Drimie S, Maciejewski K, Tonissen PB, Biggs R. Food System Transformation: Integrating a Political–Economy and Social–Ecological Approach to Regime Shifts. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(4):1313. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041313

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pereira, Laura M., Scott Drimie, Kristi Maciejewski, Patrick B. Tonissen, and Reinette Biggs 2020. "Food System Transformation: Integrating a Political–Economy and Social–Ecological Approach to Regime Shifts" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 4: 1313. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041313

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop