Associations of Socio-Demographic, Clinical and Biochemical Parameters with Healthcare Cost, Health- and Renal-Related Quality of Life in Hemodialysis Patients: A Clinical Observational Study
by
and
Khanh Vuong Diem Doan
1,2, 
Hien Thi Minh Nguyen
3,
Nhi Thi Hong Nguyen
4, 
Khoa Cao Dang
1, 
Shwu-Huey Yang
5,6,7 and
Tuyen Van Duong
5,*
1
Faculty of Public Health, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Thua Thien Hue 491-20, Vietnam
2
Institute for Community Health Research, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Thua Thien Hue 491-20, Vietnam
3
Hemodialysis Department, Quang Ngai Provincial General Hospital, Quang Ngai 531-14, Vietnam
4
Health Management Training Institute, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hue University, Thua Thien Hue 491-20, Vietnam
5
School of Nutrition and Health Sciences, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110-31, Taiwan
6
Research Center of Geriatric Nutrition, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110-31, Taiwan
7
Nutrition Research Center, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei 110-31, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17(18), 6552; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186552
Submission received: 27 July 2020
/
Revised: 4 September 2020
/
Accepted: 7 September 2020
/
Published: 9 September 2020
Abstract
:We examined factors associated with healthcare cost, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and kidney disease quality of life (KDQOL) in hemodialysis patients. We conducted a cross-sectional study on 160 patients from January to April 2019 at a hemodialysis center. Socio-demographic, clinical, and laboratory parameters and quality of life (QOL) (using KDQOL-SF-v1.3) were assessed. Monthly healthcare costs were extracted from the hospital information system. The means of healthcare cost, HRQOL, and KDQOL were VND 9.4 ± 1.6 million, VND 45.1 ± 21.9 and VND 51.3 ± 13.0, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, the healthcare cost was higher in patients with a longer hemodialysis vintage (regression coefficient (B): 0.74; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.25; 1.23), comorbidity (B: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.24; 1.31); and lower in those with a higher hematocrit concentration (B: −0.07; 95% CI: −0.13; −0.01). Patients that lived in urban areas (B: 9.08; 95% CI: 2.30; 15.85) had a better HRQOL; those with a comorbidity (B: −14.20; 95% CI: −21.43; −6.97), and with hypoalbuminemia (B: −9.31; 95% CI: −16.58; −2.04) had a poorer HRQOL. Patients with a higher level of education (B: 5.38~6.29) had a better KDQOL; those with a comorbidity had a poorer KDQOL (B: −6.17; 95% CI: −10.49; −1.85). In conclusion, a longer hemodialysis vintage, a comorbidity and a lower hematocrit concentration were associated with higher healthcare costs. Patients who lived in urban areas had a better HRQOL and a higher level of education led to a better KDQOL. Patients with a comorbidity had a lower HRQOL and KDQOL. Malnourished patients had a lower HRQOL.
1. Introduction
The prevalence and incidence of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) have been increasing around the globe [1]. The disease has created a huge economic burden on patients and the healthcare system [2,3,4]. In Vietnam, a registration system is not available for chronic kidney disease (CKD) and ESRD. According to a previous study in 2018, three available renal replacement therapies are hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis, and renal transplantation. Among those, hemodialysis is the most common modality, with about 15,000 patients [5]. In Vietnam, the healthcare system can provide treatments for around 10% of ESRD patients, and around 10% of patients who required hemodialysis therapy received the treatment [6].
Patients receiving hospital-based hemodialysis pay higher healthcare and societal costs than peritoneal dialysis patients [2,7,8,9,10,11], and general patients [10]. The cost of hemodialysis treatment has increased over time [12], even though hemodialysis patients have a poorer health-related quality of life (HRQOL), and kidney disease quality of life (KDQOL) than peritoneal dialysis patients [13]. Quality of life (QOL) is strongly associated with renal failure progression and death in CKD patients [14]. In addition, hemodialysis patients with a better HRQOL had a better adherence to recommendations [15]. However, hemodialysis patients commonly report a poor HRQOL [16,17]. QOL is under-investigated in CKD patients [18], especially in the Vietnamese context.
Though there were a few studies that investigated the costs of dialysis treatments in low–middle income countries, there is a lack of studies conducted among hemodialysis patients in Vietnam [19,20]. In addition, it remains difficult for clinicians to provide individualized care based on socio-demographic characteristics as well as clinical and laboratory parameters [21]. It has been suggested that factors associated with a decline in HRQOL during renal progression should be investigated [22]. Therefore, we aim to investigate healthcare costs, HRQOL, KDQOL, and to explore their associated factors among ESRD patients treated in a hemodialysis center in central Vietnam.
2. Methods
2.1. Study Design and Settings
We conducted a clinical cross-sectional study from January to April 2019. Data were collected on ESRD patients receiving hemodialysis treatment at the Hemodialysis Department of Quang Ngai Provincial General Hospital (QNPGH). This is a level 2 hospital (lower than national hospitals at level 1), the highest level hospital in Quang Ngai province, and is located in central Vietnam. Its function and structure are similar to other level 2 provincial hospitals. Around 70% of hemodialysis patients in Quang Ngai province received treatments at QNPGH which follow the standard hemodialysis guidelines of the Ministry of Health in Vietnam [23].
2.2. Study Participants
Patients recruited were those aged 18 years or older, who received two or three hemodialysis sessions per week. Patients excluded were those with cognitive impairments, those receiving whole-day tube feeding, at the acute stage, hospitalized and those who had suffered a stroke. A sample of 160 out of 170 patients treated at the dialysis center was selected and analyzed. Ten stroke patients were excluded. Among the three main types of vascular access, including native arteriovenous fistula (AVF), arteriovenous graft (AVG), and vascular access catheter (VAC), the AVF was used for all studied patients in the current study.
2.3. Instruments and Measurements
2.3.1. Patient’s Characteristics
We assessed patients’ age (19–59, 60–83 years), gender (women vs. men), marital status (never married vs. ever married), educational attainment (illiterate/elementary vs. junior high school vs. senior high school or higher), occupation (no job vs. having a job). Residential areas were also assessed and classified into rural areas (countryside or remote areas) vs. urban areas (or metropolitan areas). Income was classified into two groups, e.g., below the poverty line (<VND 1.0 million/month for rural areas, <VND 1.3 million/month for urban areas), and above the poverty line (≥VND 1.0 million/month for rural areas, ≥VND 1.3 million/month for urban areas), with VND 1 x = VND 23,000 according to Vietcombank-State Bank of Vietnam [24].
2.3.2. Clinical Parameters
Anthropometric parameters were measured, including waist circumference (WC, cm), height (cm), weight (kg). Body mass index (BMI) was calculated as weight (kg) divided by height (m)2. Overweight/obesity and abdominal obesity were defined as BMI ≥ 24.0 kg/m2) [25], and WC ≥ 90 for men or ≥80 for women, respectively [26]. Hemodialysis vintage (year) was recorded. Comorbidities were assessed using items of the Charlson comorbidity index [27,28]. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) were also recorded. Hypertension was defined if SBP/DBP ≥ 140/90 mmHg [29,30,31].
2.3.3. Biochemical Parameters
The laboratory data collected from medical records including red blood cells (RBC, 106/μL), white blood cells (WBC, 103/µL), hemoglobin (Hgb, g/dL), hematocrit (Hct, %) creatinine (Cre, mg/dL), pre-dialysis blood urea nitrogen (Pre-BUN, mg/dL); total protein (TP, mg/dL) and albumin (Alb, mg/dL). Anemia is defined as Hgb < 11 g/dL [32], or RBC < 4.2·106/μL, or Hct < 40% [33]. Risk of malnutrition is defined as TP < 6 g/dL, Alb < 3.5 mg/dL, Cre < 7.5 mg/dL [34]. Moreover, pre-BUN was classified into two groups (pre-BUN < 20.0 mg/dL vs. pre-BUN ≥ 20.0 mg/dL), while WBC were also classified into two groups (WBC < 11.0·103/µL vs. WBC ≥ 11.0·103/µL).
2.3.4. Healthcare Cost
All hemodialysis patients were covered by National Health Insurance (NHI). The total healthcare cost analyzed was the direct cost covered by NHI. In the current study, we analyzed monthly direct healthcare costs, e.g., costs of dialyzers and tubing, medical procedures, and costs related to laboratory testing and medications.
2.3.5. Quality of Life
Quality of life (QOL) was assessed using the Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form (KDQOL-SFTM-v1.3) instrument, version 1.3 [35]. This questionnaire includes 36 items as the generic score (HRQOL), and 43 items as ESRD-targeted areas (KDQOL) [36]. The scores were calculated following the user manual [35,37]. The generic score of HRQOL is commonly used to assess the generic QOL of hemodialysis patients [38]. This has also been used among Vietnamese people [39,40]. The total score ranges from 0 (lowest) to 100 (highest), with higher scores indicating a better QOL. In the current study, we analyzed two scales in order to assess both overall and ESRD-specific aspects of QOL. HRQOL scale was assessed for the broad evaluation of general health across different domains, e.g., physical functioning, role physical, pain, general health, emotional wellbeing, role emotional, social function, and energy/fatigue. KDQOL scale was assessed for ESRD-specific QOL, e.g., symptoms/problems related to the scale of kidney disease, effects related to the scale of kidney disease, burden related to the scale of kidney disease, work status, cognitive function, quality of social interactions, sexual function, sleep, social support, dialysis staff encouragement, and patient satisfaction [36].
2.4. Data Collection Procedure
A doctor who worked at the dialysis center screened for qualified patients using the recruitment criteria. Researchers contacted eligible patients and asked for their voluntary participation. The informed consent form was signed by all participants prior to data collection. We conducted face-to-face interviews after the dialysis session. The printed questionnaire was used for assessing patients’ characteristics, and quality of life. Medical charts were used for assessing clinical and laboratory parameters. The expenditure was extracted from the hospital information system by a researcher.
2.5. Ethical Approval
This study was reviewed and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of Hue University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Vietnam (IRB No. H2018/218).
2.6. Statistical Analysis
Firstly, we used descriptive analysis to explore the studied variables’ distribution. A one-way ANOVA test was used to compare the distributions of healthcare cost, HRQOL, and KDQOL between the categories of socio-demographic factors and clinical and biochemical parameters. Secondly, bivariate and multivariate analyses were utilized to explore the associated factors of healthcare cost, HRQOL, and KDQOL. The factors analyzed in the multivariate model were those with significant associations with healthcare cost, HRQOL, and KDQOL in the bivariate model. To avoid multicollinearity, the correlations among socio-demographic factors, clinical, and biochemical parameters were estimated using Spearman’s correlation test. The representative factors were selected if moderate or high correlations existed. Data were analyzed using IBM SPSS version 20.0 (IBM Corp, Armonk, NY, USA). The p-value < 0.05 was set to define the significant level.
3. Results
3.1. Patients’ Characteristics
Out of the sample, 29.4% were aged 60 years or above, while 62.5% were men. The means of healthcare cost, HRQOL, and KDQOL were 9.4 ± 1.6, 45.1 ± 21.9, 51.3 ± 13.0, respectively. The distribution of healthcare cost varied by hemodialysis vintage, comorbidity, and albumin (p < 0.05). The distribution of HRQOL varied by age, residence area, comorbidity, albumin, and creatinine (p < 0.05). The distribution of KDQOL varied by age, education, residence area, occupation, comorbidity, hemoglobin, albumin, and creatinine (p < 0.05; Table 1). The proportions of RBC ≥ 4.2 (1.9%), Hct ≥ 40.0 (1.9%), WBC ≥ 11.0 (1.9%), and TP < 6.0 (5.6%) were relatively small. Therefore, we kept RBC, Hct, WBC, and TP as continuous variables for regression analysis.
3.2. Associated Factors of Healthcare Cost
In the bivariate analysis, the associated factors of healthcare cost were hemodialysis vintage, comorbidity, albumin, RBC and hematocrit (p < 0.05; Table 2). RBC and Hct were highly correlated (correlation coefficient, rho = 0.87; Table S1). Therefore, we kept age, gender, hemodialysis vintage, comorbidity, Alb, and Hct in the multivariate analysis. The results show that healthcare cost was significantly higher in patients with a dialysis vintage ≥ 5 years (regression coefficient (B): 0.74; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 0.25, 1.23; p = 0.003) and with a comorbidity (B: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.24, 1.31; p = 0.005), compared to their counterparts. Patients with a higher hematocrit concentration had a lower healthcare cost (B: −0.07; 95% CI: −0.13, −0.01; p = 0.022; Table 2).
3.3. Associated Factors of HRQOL
In the bivariate analysis, associated factors of HRQOL were age, residence area, comorbidity, albumin and creatinine (p < 0.05; Table 3). Creatinine moderately correlated with albumin (rho = 0.43; Table S1). Therefore, we kept age, gender, residence area, comorbidity, and Alb in the multivariate analysis. The results show that the HRQOL score was statistically significantly higher in people who lived in an urban area (B: 9.08; 95% CI: 2.30, 15.85; p = 0.009) compared to those living in a rural area. Patients with a comorbidity (B: −14.20; 95% CI: −21.43, −6.97; p < 0.001) and with hypoalbuminemia (B: −9.31; 95% CI: −16.58, −2.04; p = 0.012) had lower HRQOL scores compared to their counterparts (Table 3).
3.4. Associated Factors of KDQOL
In the bivariate analysis, associated factors of KDQOL were age, education, residence area, occupation, comorbidity, Hgb, Alb, and Cre. Since Cre correlated with Alb. Therefore, we kept age, gender, education, residence area, occupation, comorbidity, Hgb, and Alb in the multivariate model. The results show that KDQOL score was significantly higher in patients with higher educational levels (B: 5.38; 95% CI: 0.43, 10.34; p = 0.033 for junior high school; B: 6.29; 95% CI: 1.28, 11.30; p = 0.014 for senior high school or above) compared to those with education attainment at the illiterate or elementary school level. Patients with a comorbidity had lower KDQOL (B: −6.17; 95% CI: −10.49, −1.85; p = 0.005), compared to those without a comorbidity (Table 4).
4. Discussion
The results of our study show that higher education attainment was associated with better KDQOL. This is consistent with the findings of a previous study [41]. In addition, a marginal association between education and HRQOL was found in the bivariate analysis in our study. Previous studies showed that hemodialysis patients with higher education levels had a better HRQOL [41,42,43,44]. The establishment of an education and counseling system should be comprised of safe hemodialysis services to overcome the challenges of hemodialysis treatment in Vietnam [45,46].
In our study, people who resided in urban areas had a better HRQOL and a marginally better KDQOL compared to those who lived in rural areas. A previous study showed that chronic kidney disease patients who lived in rural areas had a poorer quality of life [41]. Similarly, people who lived in rural areas had more difficulties accessing and using healthcare services and experienced more health problems, and had a poorer HRQOL, as reported in a previous study in Vietnam [47].
We found that a longer hemodialysis vintage was associated with a higher healthcare cost. This can be explained by the fact that long-term dialysis patients possibly required more treatments, or experienced more complications [48,49,50,51], which, in turn, increased the treatment burden [52]. Comorbidities were associated with a higher healthcare cost in the current study. This is similar to the findings of a previous study that elucidated that patients with comorbid conditions (e.g., liver function disorder, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and cancer) spent more than those without dialysis treatment [53]. Moreover, patients with underlying health conditions had a poorer HRQOL and KDQOL, which we also found in our study. Previous studies reported that hemodialysis patients with less comorbid conditions had a better HRQOL [44,54,55], and a better KDQOL [44]. Another study showed that ESRD patients with a history of cardiovascular disease had a poorer HRQOL [43].
The association between hemoglobin and QOL was not found to be significant in our study and a previous one [54]. This finding is supported by a large trial on hemodialysis patients that reported no significant changes in quality of life between low and high Hgb groups or over time [56]. However, the results of another study showed that lower Hgb levels were associated with a poorer HRQOL in ESRD patients [43]. Additionally, our study showed that patients with a higher Hct concentration associated with a lower healthcare cost. Therefore, anemia is still an important issue in CKD patients and new treatment approaches are needed [57].
In the current study, malnutrition (hypoalbuminemia) was associated with poor HRQOL. This is similar to the findings of previous studies, which illustrated that higher albumin levels were associated with a better HRQOL [43,54]. In addition, poor nutritional status was found to be associated with higher healthcare expenditures, worse health outcomes [58], and a poorer HRQOL in hemodialysis patients [59].
In our study, the results show that socio-demographic factors (e.g., age, gender, marital status, occupation, and income) were not significantly associated with healthcare cost, HRQOL, and KDQOL. This was in line with a previous study, which illustrated that clinical parameters were better than socio-demographics at predicting HRQOL in ESRD patients [54]. Previous studies illustrated that age [60] and employment status [61] were significantly associated with HRQOL in CKD patients, and renal transplant recipients, respectively.
The current study had some limitations. Firstly, the study was conducted in a single hemodialysis center, with a relatively small sample size, which limits the generalizability of the findings. Secondly, we used a cross-sectional design to conduct the study, which cannot draw causality. There were potential biases which may have affected the results, e.g., reporting bias and the classification of residential areas (urban vs. rural). Therefore, the findings should be interpreted with caution. In addition, the adjusted R-square values for healthcare cost (0.151), HRQOL (0.170), and KDQOL (0.183) were relatively low. This suggests that a comprehensive assessment should be carried out in future studies to explore more associated factors, e.g., dialysis effectiveness indicators (Kt/V) and dietary intake. Despite these limitations, our findings raise important issues regarding healthcare cost and QOL in hemodialysis patients. Future studies should be conducted with larger samples in different settings, and with a longitudinal design, to examine the causal risk and protective factors of healthcare expenditure and QOL.
5. Conclusions
This is the first study that was conducted in Vietnam that aimed to explore the associated factors of healthcare cost, HRQOL, and KDQOL in hemodialysis patients. Patients with a longer hemodialysis vintage, a comorbidity, and a lower hematocrit concentration had a higher healthcare cost. Patients who lived in urban areas had a better HRQOL, while those with a higher education level had a better KDQOL. Patients with a comorbidity had a lower HRQOL and KDQOL. Malnourished patients had a lower HRQOL. Effective interventions are required to reduce healthcare costs and improve QOL in both aspects (general and ESRD-specific) and to focus on those hemodialysis patients with underlying health conditions such as anemia and malnutrition, those who reside in rural areas, and those with a lower educational attainment.
Supplementary Materials
The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/18/6552/s1.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, K.V.D.D., H.T.M.N., N.T.H.N., K.C.D., S.-H.Y. and T.V.D.; methodology, K.V.D.D., H.T.M.N., N.T.H.N., K.C.D., S.-H.Y. and T.V.D.; software, H.T.M.N., T.V.D.; validation, K.V.D.D., H.T.M.N., N.T.H.N., K.C.D., S.-H.Y. and T.V.D.; formal analysis, H.T.M.N., T.V.D.; investigation, K.V.D.D., H.T.M.N., N.T.H.N., K.C.D., S.-H.Y. and T.V.D.; resources, K.V.D.D., H.T.M.N. and T.V.D.; data curation, H.T.M.N., N.T.H.N. and K.C.D.; writing—original draft preparation, K.V.D.D. and T.V.D.; writing—review and editing, K.V.D.D., H.T.M.N., N.T.H.N., K.C.D., S.-H.Y. and T.V.D.; supervision, K.V.D.D., S.-H.Y. and T.V.D.; project administration, H.T.M.N., N.T.H.N., K.C.D.; funding acquisition, K.V.D.D. and T.V.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This study was supported by Taipei Medical University in Taiwan (108-6202-008-112).
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank the doctors and nurses for helping with data collection.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- United States Renal Data System. International Comparisons. The 2018 USRDS Annual Data Report: Epidemiology of Kidney Disease in the United States: Volume 2—End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) in the United States; National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
- Wong, C.K.H.; Chen, J.; Fung, S.K.S.; Mok, M.M.Y.; Cheng, Y.L.; Kong, I.; Lo, W.K.; Lui, S.L.; Chan, T.M.; Lam, C.L.K. Direct and indirect costs of end-stage renal disease patients in the first and second years after initiation of nocturnal home haemodialysis, hospital haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2019, 34, 1565–1576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Roggeri, A.; Roggeri, D.P.; Zocchetti, C.; Bersani, M.; Conte, F. Healthcare costs of the progression of chronic kidney disease and different dialysis techniques estimated through administrative database analysis. J. Nephrol. 2017, 30, 263–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ismail, H.; Abdul Manaf, M.R.; Abdul Gafor, A.H.; Mohamad Zaher, Z.M.; Ibrahim, A.I.N. Economic Burden of ESRD to the Malaysian Health Care System. Kidney Int. Rep. 2019, 4, 1261–1270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dinh, L.D.; Nguyen, D.H. Vascular access for hemodialysis: Current practice in Vietnam. J. Vasc. Access 2018, 20, 20–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Duong, C.M.; Olszyna, D.P.; McLaws, M.L. Hepatitis B and C virus infections among patients with end stage renal disease in a low-resourced hemodialysis center in Vietnam: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health 2015, 15, 192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Van Bui, P. How peritoneal dialysis has developed in Vietnam. Perit. Dial. Int. 2008, 28, S63–S66. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Chang, Y.T.; Hwang, J.S.; Hung, S.Y.; Tsai, M.S.; Wu, J.L.; Sung, J.M.; Wang, J.D. Cost-effectiveness of hemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis: A national cohort study with 14 years follow-up and matched for comorbidities and propensity score. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 30266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tang, C.-H.; Chen, H.-H.; Wu, M.-J.; Hsu, B.-G.; Tsai, J.-C.; Kuo, C.-C.; Lin, S.-P.; Chen, T.-H.; Sue, Y.-M. Out-of-pocket costs and productivity losses in haemodialysis and peritoneal dialysis from a patient interview survey in Taiwan. BMJ Open 2019, 9, e023062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Eriksson, J.K.; Neovius, M.; Jacobson, S.H.; Elinder, C.G.; Hylander, B. Healthcare costs in chronic kidney disease and renal replacement therapy: A population-based cohort study in Sweden. BMJ Open 2016, 6, e012062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rizk, R.; Hiligsmann, M.; Karavetian, M.; Salameh, P.; Evers, S.M. A societal cost-of-illness study of hemodialysis in Lebanon. J. Med. Econ. 2016, 19, 1157–1166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chang, Y.K.; Hsu, C.C.; Chen, P.C.; Chen, Y.S.; Hwang, S.J.; Li, T.C.; Huang, C.C.; Li, C.Y.; Sung, F.C. Trends of cost and mortality of patients on haemodialysis with end stage renal disease. Nephrology 2015, 20, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chuasuwan, A.; Pooripussarakul, S.; Thakkinstian, A.; Ingsathit, A.; Pattanaprateep, O. Comparisons of quality of life between patients underwent peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2020, 18, 191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Tsai, Y.-C.; Hung, C.-C.; Hwang, S.-J.; Wang, S.-L.; Hsiao, S.-M.; Lin, M.-Y.; Kung, L.-F.; Hsiao, P.-N.; Chen, H.-C. Quality of life predicts risks of end-stage renal disease and mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2010, 25, 1621–1626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Hornik, B.; Duława, J. Frailty, Quality of Life, Anxiety, and Other Factors Affecting Adherence to Physical Activity Recommendations by Hemodialysis Patients. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Kraus, M.A.; Fluck, R.J.; Weinhandl, E.D.; Kansal, S.; Copland, M.; Komenda, P.; Finkelstein, F.O. Intensive Hemodialysis and Health-Related Quality of Life. Am. J. Kidney. Dis. 2016, 68, S33–S42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Fukuhara, S.; Lopes, A.A.; Bragg-Gresham, J.L.; Kurokawa, K.; Mapes, D.L.; Akizawa, T.; Bommer, J.; Canaud, B.J.; Port, F.K.; Held, P.J.; et al. Health-related quality of life among dialysis patients on three continents: The Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study. Kidney Int. 2003, 64, 1903–1910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Chong, K.; Unruh, M. Why does quality of life remain an under-investigated issue in chronic kidney disease and why is it rarely set as an outcome measure in trials in this population? Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2017, 32, ii47–ii52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Mushi, L.; Marschall, P.; Fleßa, S. The cost of dialysis in low and middle-income countries: A systematic review. BMC Health Serv. Res. 2015, 15, 506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Karopadi, A.N.; Mason, G.; Rettore, E.; Ronco, C. Cost of peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis across the world. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 2013, 28, 2553–2569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Lin, X.; Gu, L.; Zhu, M.; Che, M.; Yu, Z.; Cai, H.; Ni, Z.; Zhang, W. Clinical Outcome of Twice-Weekly Hemodialysis Patients with Long-Term Dialysis Vintage. Kidney Blood Press. Res. 2018, 43, 1104–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Avramovic, M.; Stefanovic, V. Health-related quality of life in different stages of renal failure. Artif. Organs 2012, 36, 581–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Vietnam Ministry of Health. Decision No. 2482/QĐ-BYT dated April 13, 2018, Promulgating Technical Guidance for Dialysis Treatment. Available online: https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/The-thao-Y-te/Quyet-dinh-2482-QD-BYT-2018-tai-lieu-Huong-dan-quy-trinh-ky-thuat-Than-nhan-tao-379559.aspx (accessed on 15 April 2018).
- The Prime Minister of Government. Decision No. 59/2015/QD-TTg dated November 19, 2015, Promulgating Multidimensional Poverty Levels Applicable during 2016–2020. Available online: https://thuvienphapluat.vn/van-ban/Van-hoa-Xa-hoi/Quyet-dinh-59-2015-QD-TTg-chuan-ngheo-tiep-can-da-chieu-ap-dung-2016-2020-296044.aspx (accessed on 31 December 2015).
- Hwang, L.-C.; Bai, C.-H.; Chen, C.-J. Prevalence of Obesity and Metabolic Syndrome in Taiwan. J. Formos. Med. Assoc. 2006, 105, 626–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- World Health Organization. Waist Circumference and Waist-Hip Ratio: Report of a WHO Expert Consultation, Geneva, 8–11 December 2008. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/44583 (accessed on 15 April 2018).
- Quan, H.; Li, B.; Couris, C.M.; Fushimi, K.; Graham, P.; Hider, P.; Januel, J.-M.; Sundararajan, V. Updating and validating the Charlson comorbidity index and score for risk adjustment in hospital discharge abstracts using data from 6 countries. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2011, 173, 676–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Charlson, M.E.; Pompei, P.; Ales, K.L.; MacKenzie, C.R. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. J. Chronic Dis. 1987, 40, 373–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Judith, A.W.; World Health Organization; International Society of Hypertension Writing Group. World Health Organization-International Society of Hypertension Writing Group, 2003 World Health Organization (WHO)/International Society of Hypertension (ISH) statement on management of hypertension. J. Hypertens. 2003, 21, 1983–1992. [Google Scholar]
- Chobanian, A.V.; Bakris, G.L.; Black, H.R.; Cushman, W.C.; Green, L.A.; Izzo, J.; Joseph, L.; Jones, D.W.; Materson, B.J.; Oparil, S. National Heart Lung and Blood Institute Joint National Committee on Prevention Detection Evaluation and Treatment of High Blood Pressure; and the National High Blood Pressure Education Program Coordinating Committee, The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure: The JNC 7 report. JAMA 2003, 289, 2560–2571. [Google Scholar]
- World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Noncommunicable Diseases 2014. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/148114 (accessed on 15 April 2018).
- KDOQI National Kidney Foundation. Clinical Practice Guidelines and Clinical Practice Recommendations for Anemia in Chronic Kidney Disease in Adults. Am. J. Kidney. Dis. 2006, 47, S16–S85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Billett, H.H. Chapter 151-Hemoglobin and Hematocrit. In Clinical Methods: The History, Physical, and Laboratory Examinations, 3rd ed.; Walker, H.K., Hall, W.D., Hurst, J.W., Eds.; Butterworths: Boston, MA, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
- Lopes, A.A.; Bragg-Gresham, J.L.; Elder, S.J.; Ginsberg, N.; Goodkin, D.A.; Pifer, T.; Lameire, N.; Marshall, M.R.; Asano, Y.; Akizawa, T.; et al. Independent and Joint Associations of Nutritional Status Indicators With Mortality Risk Among Chronic Hemodialysis Patients in the Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS). J. Ren. Nutr. 2010, 20, 224–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hays, R.D.; Kallich, J.; Mapes, D.; Coons, S.; Amin, N.; Carter, W.B.; Kamberg, C. Kidney Disease Quality of Life Short Form (KDQOL-SF), Version 1.3: A Manual for Use and Scoring; RAND Corporation: Santa Monica, CA, USA, 1997. [Google Scholar]
- Hays, R.D.; Kallich, J.D.; Mapes, D.L.; Coons, S.J.; Carter, W.B. Development of the kidney disease quality of life (KDQOL) instrument. Qual. Life Res. 1994, 3, 329–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Hays, R.D.; Sherbourne, C.D.; Mazel, R.M. The RAND 36-Item Health Survey 1.0. Health Econ. 1993, 2, 217–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liem, Y.S.; Bosch, J.L.; Arends, L.R.; Heijenbrok-Kal, M.H.; Hunink, M.G. Quality of life assessed with the Medical Outcomes Study Short Form 36-Item Health Survey of patients on renal replacement therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Value Health 2007, 10, 390–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Ngo-Metzger, Q.; Sorkin, D.H.; Mangione, C.M.; Gandek, B.; Hays, R.D. Evaluating the SF-36 Health Survey (Version 2) in older Vietnamese Americans. J. Aging Health 2008, 20, 420–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Nguyen, H.C.; Nguyen, M.H.; Do, B.N.; Tran, C.Q.; Nguyen, T.T.P.; Pham, K.M.; Pham, L.V.; Tran, K.V.; Duong, T.T.; Tran, T.V.; et al. People with suspected COVID-19 symptoms were more likely depressed and had lower health-related quality of life: The potential benefit of health literacy. J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9, 965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Mahato, S.K.S.; Apidechkul, T.; Sriwongpan, P.; Hada, R.; Sharma, G.N.; Nayak, S.K.; Mahato, R.K. Factors associated with quality of life among chronic kidney disease patients in Nepal: A cross-sectional study. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2020, 18, 207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Bayoumi, M.; Al Harbi, A.; Al Suwaida, A.; Al Ghonaim, M.; Al Wakeel, J.; Mishkiry, A. Predictors of quality of life in hemodialysis patients. Saudi J. Kidney Dis. Transpl. 2013, 24, 254–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Chen, J.Y.; Wan, E.Y.F.; Choi, E.P.H.; Chan, A.K.C.; Chan, K.H.Y.; Tsang, J.P.Y.; Lam, C.L.K. The Health-Related Quality of Life of Chinese Patients on Hemodialysis and Peritoneal Dialysis. Patient 2017, 10, 799–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Pan, C.W.; Wu, Y.; Zhou, H.J.; Xu, B.X.; Wang, P. Health-Related Quality of Life and Its Factors of Hemodialysis Patients in Suzhou, China. Blood Purif. 2018, 45, 327–333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Duong, C.M.; Olszyna, D.P.; Nguyen, P.D.; McLaws, M.L. Challenges of hemodialysis in Vietnam: Experience from the first standardized district dialysis unit in Ho Chi Minh City. BMC Nephrol. 2015, 16, 122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kokubo, K.; Kobayashi, K.; Urabe, S.; Matsubara, H.; Naramura, T.; Wakai, H.; Naganuma, T.; Nakajima, F.; Shibahara, N.; Hyodo, T.; et al. Support for Dialysis Therapy in Vietnam, Cambodia, and Myanmar by Japanese Societies in the Field of Blood Purification. Blood Purif. 2017, 44, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tran, B.X.; Nguyen, L.H.; Nong, V.M.; Nguyen, C.T. Health status and health service utilization in remote and mountainous areas in Vietnam. Health Qual. Life Outcomes 2016, 14, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Kaneko, S.; Yamagata, K. Hemodialysis-related amyloidosis: Is it still relevant? Semin. Dial. 2018, 31, 612–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Masud, A.; Costanzo, E.J.; Zuckerman, R.; Asif, A. The Complications of Vascular Access in Hemodialysis. Semin. Thromb. Hemost. 2018, 44, 57–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Ahmadmehrabi, S.; Tang, W.H.W. Hemodialysis-induced cardiovascular disease. Semin. Dial. 2018, 31, 258–267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Morfin, J.A.; Fluck, R.J.; Weinhandl, E.D.; Kansal, S.; McCullough, P.A.; Komenda, P. Intensive Hemodialysis and Treatment Complications and Tolerability. Am. J. Kidney. Dis. 2016, 68, S43–S50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Kraus, M.A.; Kansal, S.; Copland, M.; Komenda, P.; Weinhandl, E.D.; Bakris, G.L.; Chan, C.T.; Fluck, R.J.; Burkart, J.M. Intensive Hemodialysis and Potential Risks With Increasing Treatment. Am. J. Kidney. Dis. 2016, 68, S51–S58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
- Su, B.G.; Tsai, K.L.; Yeh, S.H.; Ho, Y.Y.; Liu, S.Y.; Rivers, P.A. Risk factor and cost accounting analysis for dialysis patients in Taiwan. Health Serv. Manage. Res. 2010, 23, 84–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Yang, F.; Griva, K.; Lau, T.; Vathsala, A.; Lee, E.; Ng, H.J.; Mooppil, N.; Foo, M.; Newman, S.P.; Chia, K.S.; et al. Health-related quality of life of Asian patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in Singapore. Qual. Life Res. 2015, 24, 2163–2171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dejvorakul, S.; Kumar, R.; Srirojanakul, S.; Panupichit, N.; Somrongthong, R. Factors predicted with quality of life among hemodialysis patients in private hospital of Thailand. Hosp. Pract. 2019, 47, 254–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Coyne, D.W. The health-related quality of life was not improved by targeting higher hemoglobin in the Normal Hematocrit Trial. Kidney Int. 2012, 82, 235–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Bonomini, M.; Del Vecchio, L.; Sirolli, V.; Locatelli, F. New Treatment Approaches for the Anemia of CKD. Am. J. Kidney. Dis. 2016, 67, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Dou, Y.; Wang, P.; Yuan, F.; Liang, X.; Liu, D.; Xiao, J.; Zhao, Z.; Liu, Z. The geriatric nutritional risk index may predict healthcare costs and health transitions during hemodialysis in China. Asia Pac. J. Clin. Nutr. 2017, 26, 6–10. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
- Beberashvili, I.; Azar, A.; Sinuani, I.; Shapiro, G.; Feldman, L.; Sandbank, J.; Stav, K.; Efrati, S. Geriatric nutritional risk index, muscle function, quality of life and clinical outcome in hemodialysis patients. Clin. Nutr. 2016, 35, 1522–1529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Abeywickrama, H.M.; Wimalasiri, S.; Koyama, Y.; Uchiyama, M.; Shimizu, U.; Kakihara, N.; Chandrajith, R.; Nanayakkara, N. Quality of Life and Symptom Burden among Chronic Kidney Disease of Uncertain Etiology (CKDu) Patients in Girandurukotte, Sri Lanka. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 4041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
- Jordakieva, G.; Grabovac, I.; Steiner, M.; Winnicki, W.; Zitta, S.; Stefanac, S.; Brooks, M.; Sunder-Plaßmann, G.; Rosenkranz, A.R.; Godnic-Cvar, J. Employment Status and Associations with Workability, Quality of Life and Mental Health after Kidney Transplantation in Austria. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 1254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Table 1.
Participants’ characteristics, healthcare cost, health- and renal-related quality of life (N = 160).
Table 1.
Participants’ characteristics, healthcare cost, health- and renal-related quality of life (N = 160).
| Variables | Total Sample | Healthcare Cost * | HRQOL | KDQOL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | Mean ± SD | p ** | Mean ± SD | p ** | Mean ± SD | p ** | |
| Characteristics | |||||||
| Age, year | 0.059 | 0.030 | 0.001 | ||||
| 19–59 | 113 (70.6) | 9.6 ± 1.6 | 47.5 ± 21.1 | 53.4 ± 13.1 | |||
| 60–83 | 47 (29.4) | 9.1 ± 1.5 | 39.2 ± 22.9 | 46.3 ± 11.4 | |||
| Gender | 0.732 | 0.491 | 0.847 | ||||
| Women | 60 (37.5) | 9.4 ± 1.7 | 46.6 ± 22.8 | 51.5 ± 12.3 | |||
| Men | 100 (62.5) | 9.4 ± 1.5 | 44.1 ± 21.4 | 51.1 ± 13.5 | |||
| Marital status | 0.371 | 0.532 | 0.127 | ||||
| Never married | 25 (15.6) | 9.7 ± 1.7 | 47.6 ± 17.0 | 54.9 ± 10.6 | |||
| Ever married | 135 (84.4) | 9.4 ± 1.5 | 44.6 ± 22.7 | 50.6 ± 13.3 | |||
| Education | 0.416 | 0.130 | 0.001 | ||||
| Illiterate or elementary | 54 (33.8) | 9.2 ± 1.7 | 40.2 ± 22.4 | 45.8 ± 11.0 | |||
| Junior high school | 52 (32.6) | 9.5 ± 1.6 | 47.7 ± 21.4 | 52.9 ± 12.6 | |||
| Senior high school or above | 54 (33.8) | 9.5 ± 1.4 | 47.4 ± 21.4 | 55.3 ± 13.6 | |||
| Residence area | 0.740 | 0.029 | 0.034 | ||||
| Rural | 109 (68.1) | 9.4 ± 1.5 | 42.5 ± 21.6 | 49.8 ± 12.4 | |||
| Urban | 51 (31.9) | 9.5 ± 1.7 | 50.6 ± 21.7 | 54.5 ± 13.7 | |||
| Occupation | 0.376 | 0.238 | 0.023 | ||||
| No job | 120 (75.0) | 9.3 ± 1.6 | 43.9 ± 21.1 | 49.9 ± 12.5 | |||
| Having job | 40 (25.0) | 9.6 ± 1.4 | 48.6 ± 24 | 55.3 ± 13.9 | |||
| Income *** | 0.335 | 0.466 | 0.805 | ||||
| Below poverty line | 119 (74.4) | 9.3 ± 1.5 | 45.8 ± 20.6 | 51.4 ± 12.3 | |||
| Above poverty line | 41 (25.6) | 9.6 ± 1.9 | 42.9 ± 25.5 | 50.8 ± 14.9 | |||
| Clinical parameters | |||||||
| BMI, kg/m2 | 0.954 | 0.250 | 0.163 | ||||
| BMI < 24.0 | 145 (90.6) | 9.4 ± 1.6 | 44.4 ± 21.6 | 50.8 ± 13.0 | |||
| BMI ≥ 24.0 | 15 (9.4) | 9.4 ± 1.2 | 51.3 ± 24.3 | 55.8 ± 12.2 | |||
| WC ****, cm | 0.253 | 0.136 | 0.103 | ||||
| Normal | 121 (75.6) | 9.5 ± 1.6 | 43.6 ± 21.5 | 50.3 ± 13.8 | |||
| Obese | 39 (24.4) | 9.2 ± 1.4 | 49.6 ± 22.9 | 54.2 ± 9.6 | |||
| HD vintage, year | 0.009 | 0.652 | 0.919 | ||||
| <5 | 64 (40) | 9.0 ± 1.8 | 46.0 ± 22.8 | 51.2 ± 12.7 | |||
| ≥5 | 96 (60) | 9.7 ± 1.3 | 44.4 ± 21.4 | 51.4 ± 13.3 | |||
| Comorbidity | 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.002 | ||||
| None | 116 (72.5) | 9.2 ± 1.5 | 49.4 ± 20.5 | 53.2 ± 12.8 | |||
| One or more | 44 (27.5) | 10.1 ± 1.6 | 33.5 ± 21.4 | 46.1 ± 12.3 | |||
| SBP, mmHg | 0.420 | 0.145 | 0.177 | ||||
| SBP < 140 | 14 (8.8) | 9.1 ± 1.1 | 36.9 ± 19.9 | 46.8 ± 13.8 | |||
| SBP ≥ 140 | 146 (91.3) | 9.4 ± 1.6 | 45.8 ± 22.0 | 51.7 ± 12.9 | |||
| DBP, mmHg | 0.357 | 0.937 | 0.560 | ||||
| DBP < 90 | 55 (34.4) | 9.3 ± 1.6 | 44.9 ± 20.8 | 50.5 ± 12.3 | |||
| DBP ≥ 90 | 105 (65.6) | 9.5 ± 1.6 | 45.2 ± 22.6 | 51.7 ± 13.4 | |||
| Laboratory parameters | |||||||
| Hgb, g/dL | 0.366 | 0.097 | 0.035 | ||||
| Hgb ≥ 11.0 | 26 (16.3) | 9.2 ± 0.8 | 38.5 ± 22.7 | 46.4 ± 13.1 | |||
| Hgb < 11.0 | 134 (83.8) | 9.5 ± 1.7 | 46.3 ± 21.6 | 52.2 ± 12.8 | |||
| Alb, mg/dL | 0.028 | 0.002 | 0.011 | ||||
| Alb ≥ 3.5 | 117 (73.1) | 9.2 ± 1.4 | 48.2 ± 21.9 | 52.9 ± 12.7 | |||
| Alb < 3.5 | 43 (26.9) | 9.9 ± 1.8 | 36.4 ± 19.8 | 47.0 ± 12.9 | |||
| Cre, mg/dL | 0.804 | <0.001 | <0.001 | ||||
| Cre ≥ 7.5 | 135 (84.4) | 9.4 ± 1.5 | 47.9 ± 21.1 | 52.9 ± 12.6 | |||
| Cre < 7.5 | 25 (15.6) | 9.5 ± 1.8 | 29.7 ± 20.1 | 42.4 ± 11.7 | |||
| Pre-BUN, mg/dL | 0.640 | 0.083 | 0.147 | ||||
| Pre-BUN < 20.0 | 32 (20.0) | 9.5 ± 1.7 | 39.1 ± 22.1 | 48.3 ± 13.1 | |||
| Pre-BUN ≥ 20.0 | 128 (80.0) | 9.4 ± 1.5 | 46.6 ± 21.7 | 52.0 ± 12.9 | |||
| RBC, 106/μL | 0.942 | 0.796 | 0.467 | ||||
| RBC ≥ 4.2 | 3 (1.9) | 9.5 ± 0.5 | 41.8 ± 12.2 | 45.9 ± 6.1 | |||
| RBC < 4.2 | 157 (98.1) | 9.4 ± 1.6 | 45.1 ± 22.1 | 51.4 ± 13.1 | |||
| Hct, % | 0.437 | 0.921 | 0.704 | ||||
| Hct ≥ 40.0 | 3 (1.9) | 8.7 ± 1.0 | 43.8 ± 9.3 | 48.4 ± 1.6 | |||
| Hct < 40.0 | 157 (98.1) | 9.4 ± 1.6 | 45.1 ± 22.1 | 51.3 ± 13.1 | |||
| WBC, 103/µL | 0.325 | 0.422 | 0.336 | ||||
| WBC < 11.0 | 157 (98.1) | 9.4 ± 1.6 | 45.3 ± 21.9 | 51.4 ± 13.0 | |||
| WBC ≥ 11.0 | 3 (1.9) | 10.3 ± 2.2 | 35.0 ± 21.5 | 44.1 ± 9.7 | |||
| TP, g/dL | 0.088 | 0.622 | 0.281 | ||||
| TP ≥ 6.0 | 151 (94.4) | 9.4 ± 1.5 | 44.8 ± 22.0 | 51.6 ± 13.0 | |||
| TP < 6.0 | 9 (5.6) | 10.3 ± 2.0 | 48.6 ± 20.7 | 46.7 ± 12.2 | |||
| Healthcare cost *, mean ± SD | 9.4 ± 1.6 | ||||||
| HRQOL, Mean ± SD | 45.1 ± 21.9 | ||||||
| KDQOL, Mean ± SD | 51.3 ± 13.0 | ||||||
Abbreviations: HRQOL, health-related quality of life; KDQOL, kidney disease quality of life; SD, standard deviation; BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; HD, hemodialysis; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; Hgb, hemoglobin; Alb, albumin; Cre, creatinine; pre-BUN, pre-dialysis blood urea nitrogen; RBC, red blood cells; Hct, hematocrit; WBC, white blood cells; TP, total protein. *: The total healthcare cost was measure in millions of VND (USD 1 = VND 23,000 according to Vietcombank—the state bank of Vietnam). **: Result of ANOVA test. ***: Monthly income was classified into below the poverty line (<VND 1.0 million/month for rural areas, <VND 1.3 million/month for urban areas), and above the poverty line (≥VND 1.0 million/month for rural areas, ≥VND 1.3 million/month for urban areas). ****: Abdominal obesity was defined as WC ≥ 90 for men or ≥80 for women, respectively.
Table 2.
Associated factors of healthcare cost via bivariate and multivariate linear regression analyses (N = 160).
Table 2.
Associated factors of healthcare cost via bivariate and multivariate linear regression analyses (N = 160).
| Variables | Healthcare Cost* | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bivariate | Multivariate | |||
| B (95% CI) | p | B (95% CI) | p | |
| Characteristics | ||||
| Age, year | ||||
| 19–59 | ||||
| 60–83 | −0.51 (−1.05, 0.02) | 0.059 | −0.49 (−1.00, 0.03) | 0.067 |
| Gender | ||||
| Women | ||||
| Men | 0.09 (−0.42, 0.60) | 0.732 | 0.132 (−0.35, 0.61) | 0.587 |
| Marital status | ||||
| Never married | ||||
| Ever married | −0.31 (−0.98, 0.37) | 0.371 | ||
| Education | ||||
| Illiterate or elementary | ||||
| Junior high school | 0.34 (−0.26, 0.94) | 0.269 | ||
| Senior high school or above | 0.36 (−0.24, 0.95) | 0.238 | ||
| Residence area | ||||
| Rural | ||||
| Urban | 0.09 (−0.44, 0.62) | 0.740 | ||
| Occupation | ||||
| No job | ||||
| Having job | 0.25 (−0.31, 0.82) | 0.376 | ||
| Income ** | ||||
| Below poverty | ||||
| Above poverty | 0.27 (−0.29, 0.84) | 0.335 | ||
| Clinical parameters | ||||
| BMI, kg/m2 | ||||
| BMI < 24.0 | ||||
| BMI ≥ 24.0 | −0.02 (−0.87, 0.82) | 0.954 | ||
| WC ***, cm | ||||
| Normal | ||||
| Obese | −0.33 (−0.90, 0.24) | 0.253 | ||
| HD vintage, year | ||||
| <5 | ||||
| ≥5 | 0.66 (0.17, 1.15) | 0.009 | 0.74 (0.25, 1.23) | 0.003 |
| Comorbidity | ||||
| None | ||||
| One or more | 0.89 (0.36, 1.43) | 0.001 | 0.77 (0.24, 1.31) | 0.005 |
| SBP, mmHg | ||||
| SBP < 140 | ||||
| SBP ≥ 140 | 0.36 (−0.51, 1.22) | 0.420 | ||
| DBP, mmHg | ||||
| DBP < 90 | ||||
| DBP ≥ 90 | 0.24 (−0.27, 0.76) | 0.357 | ||
| Laboratory parameters | ||||
| Hgb, g/dL | ||||
| Hgb ≥ 11.0 | ||||
| Hgb < 11.0 | 0.31 (−0.36, 0.97) | 0.366 | ||
| Alb, mg/dL | ||||
| Alb ≥ 3.5 | ||||
| Alb < 3.5 | 0.61 (0.07, 1.16) | 0.028 | 0.28 (−0.27, 0.83) | 0.312 |
| Cre, mg/dL | ||||
| Cre ≥ 7.5 | ||||
| Cre < 7.5 | 0.09 (−0.59, 0.76) | 0.804 | ||
| Pre-BUN, mg/dL | ||||
| Pre-BUN < 20 | ||||
| Pre-BUN ≥ 20 | −0.15 (−0.76, 0.47) | 0.640 | ||
| RBC, 106/μL | −0.55 (−1.02, −0.09) | 0.021 | ||
| Hct, % | −0.08 (−0.13, −0.02) | 0.005 | −0.07 (−0.13, −0.01) | 0.022 |
| WBC, 103/µL | 0.01 (−0.12, 0.14) | 0.919 | ||
| TP, mg/dL | 0.05 (−0.38, 0.48) | 0.814 | ||
| Adjusted R square | 0.151 | |||
Abbreviations: B, regression coefficient; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; HD, hemodialysis; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; Hgb, hemoglobin; Alb, albumin; Cre, creatinine; pre-BUN, pre-dialysis blood urea nitrogen; RBC, red blood cells; Hct, hematocrit; WBC, white blood cells; TP, total protein. *: The total healthcare cost was measure in millions of VND (USD 1 = VND 23,000 according to Vietcombank-State Bank of Vietnam). **: Monthly income was classified into below the poverty line (<VND 1.0 million/month for rural areas, < VND 1.3 million/month for urban areas), and above the poverty line (≥VND 1.0 million/month for rural areas, ≥VND 1.3 million/month for urban areas). ***: Abdominal obesity was defined as WC ≥ 90 for men or ≥80 for women, respectively.
Table 3.
Associated factors of health-related quality of life via bivariate and multivariate linear regression analyses (N = 160).
Table 3.
Associated factors of health-related quality of life via bivariate and multivariate linear regression analyses (N = 160).
| Variables | HRQOL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bivariate | Multivariate | |||
| B (95%CI) | p | B (95%CI) | p | |
| Characteristics | ||||
| Age, year | ||||
| 19–59 | ||||
| 60–83 | −8.25 (−15.68, −0.83) | 0.030 | −5.89 (−12.83, 1.05) | 0.096 |
| Gender | ||||
| Women | ||||
| Men | −2.48 (−9.56, 4.60) | 0.491 | −1.80 (−8.42, 4.83) | 0.593 |
| Marital status | ||||
| Never married | ||||
| Ever married | −2.99 (−12.44, 6.45) | 0.532 | ||
| Education | ||||
| Illiterate or elementary | ||||
| Junior high school | 7.54 (−0.81, 15.90) | 0.076 | ||
| Senior high school or above | 7.26 (−1.02, 15.53) | 0.085 | ||
| Residence area | ||||
| Rural | ||||
| Urban | 8.08 (0.82, 15.33) | 0.029 | 9.08 (2.30, 15.85) | 0.009 |
| Occupation | ||||
| No job | ||||
| Having job | 4.73 (−3.16, 12.63) | 0.238 | ||
| Income * | ||||
| Below poverty | ||||
| Above poverty | −2.91 (−10.76, 4.94) | 0.466 | ||
| Clinical parameters | ||||
| BMI, kg/m2 | ||||
| BMI < 24.0 | ||||
| BMI ≥ 24.0 | 6.85 (−4.87, 18.58) | 0.250 | ||
| WC **, cm | ||||
| Normal | ||||
| Obese | 6.02 (−1.92, 13.96) | 0.136 | ||
| HD vintage, year | ||||
| <5 | ||||
| ≥5 | −1.60 (−8.60, 5.40) | 0.652 | ||
| Comorbidity | ||||
| None | ||||
| One or more | −15.95 (−23.21, −8.68) | <0.001 | −14.20 (−21.43, −6.97) | <0.001 |
| SBP, mmHg | ||||
| SBP < 140 | ||||
| SBP ≥ 140 | 8.94 (−3.12, 21.01) | 0.145 | ||
| DBP, mmHg | ||||
| DBP < 90 | ||||
| DBP ≥ 90 | 0.29 (−6.94, 7.52) | 0.937 | ||
| Laboratory parameters | ||||
| Hgb, g/dL | ||||
| Hgb ≥ 11.0 | ||||
| Hgb < 11.0 | 7.80 (−1.43, 17.02) | 0.097 | ||
| Alb, mg/dL | ||||
| Alb ≥ 3.5 | ||||
| Alb < 3.5 | −11.77 (−19.29, −4.25) | 0.002 | −9.31 (−16.58, −2.04) | 0.012 |
| Cre, mg/dL | ||||
| Cre ≥ 7.5 | ||||
| Cre < 7.5 | −18.22 (−27.23, −9.21) | <0.001 | ||
| Pre-BUN, mg/dL | ||||
| Pre-BUN < 20 | ||||
| Pre-BUN ≥ 20 | 7.50 (−1.00, 16.00) | 0.083 | ||
| RBC, 106/μL | −0.34 (−6.98, 6.30) | 0.919 | ||
| Hct, % | −0.20 (−0.98, 0.58) | 0.613 | ||
| WBC, 103/µL | −1.01 (−2.85, 0.82) | 0.277 | ||
| TP, mg/dL | −1.19 (−7.14, 4.76) | 0.694 | ||
| Adjusted R square | 0.170 | |||
Abbreviations: HRQOL, health-related quality of life; B, regression coefficient; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; HD, hemodialysis; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; Hgb, hemoglobin; Alb, albumin; Cre, creatinine; pre-BUN, pre-dialysis blood urea nitrogen; RBC, red blood cells; Hct, hematocrit; WBC, white blood cells; TP, total protein. *: Monthly income was classified into below the poverty line (<VND 1.0 million/month for rural areas, <VND 1.3 million/month for urban areas), and above the poverty line (≥VND 1.0 million/month for rural areas, ≥VND 1.3 million/month for urban areas). **: Abdominal obesity was defined as WC ≥ 90 for men or ≥80 for women, respectively.
Table 4.
Associated factors of kidney disease quality of life via bivariate and multivariate linear regression analyses (N = 160).
Table 4.
Associated factors of kidney disease quality of life via bivariate and multivariate linear regression analyses (N = 160).
| Variables | KDQOL | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bivariate | Multivariate | |||
| B (95% CI) | p | B (95% CI) | p | |
| Characteristics | ||||
| Age, year | ||||
| 19–59 | ||||
| 60–83 | −7.13 (−11.46, −2.80) | 0.001 | −3.66 (−8.08, 0.77) | 0.104 |
| Gender | ||||
| Women | ||||
| Men | −0.41 (−4.62, 3.80) | 0.847 | −0.25 (−4.25, 3.76) | 0.904 |
| Marital status | ||||
| Never married | ||||
| Ever married | −4.32 (−9.89, 1.25) | 0.127 | ||
| Education | ||||
| Illiterate or elementary | ||||
| Junior high school | 7.12 (2.35, 11.89) | 0.004 | 5.38 (0.43, 10.34) | 0.033 |
| Senior high school or above | 9.49 (4.76, 14.21) | < 0.001 | 6.29 (1.28, 11.30) | 0.014 |
| Residence area | ||||
| Rural | ||||
| Urban | 4.67 (0.36, 8.99) | 0.034 | 4.02 (−0.08, 8.11) | 0.055 |
| Occupation | ||||
| No job | ||||
| Having job | 5.39 (0.76, 10.02) | 0.023 | 1.96 (−2.59, 6.51) | 0.396 |
| Income * | ||||
| Below poverty | ||||
| Above poverty | −0.59 (−5.25, 4.08) | 0.805 | ||
| Clinical parameters | ||||
| BMI, kg/m2 | ||||
| BMI < 24.0 | ||||
| BMI ≥ 24.0 | 4.93 (−2.01, 11.88) | 0.163 | ||
| WC **, cm | ||||
| Normal | ||||
| Obese | 3.90 (−0.8, 8.61) | 0.103 | ||
| HD vintage, year | ||||
| <5 | ||||
| ≥5 | 0.22 (−3.94, 4.37) | 0.919 | ||
| Comorbidity | ||||
| None | ||||
| One or more | −7.12 (−11.54, −2.69) | 0.002 | −6.17 (−10.49, −1.85) | 0.005 |
| SBP, mmHg | ||||
| SBP < 140 | ||||
| SBP ≥ 140 | 4.92 (−2.25, 12.09) | 0.177 | ||
| DBP, mmHg | ||||
| DBP < 90 | ||||
| DBP ≥ 90 | 1.27 (−3.02, 5.55) | 0.560 | ||
| Laboratory parameters | ||||
| Hgb, g/dL | ||||
| Hgb ≥ 11.0 | ||||
| Hgb < 11.0 | 5.88 (0.43, 11.32) | 0.035 | 4.23 (−0.98, 9.43) | 0.111 |
| Alb, mg/dL | ||||
| Alb ≥ 3.5 | ||||
| Alb < 3.5 | −5.88 (−10.38, −1.38) | 0.011 | −3.17 (−7.55, 1.21) | 0.155 |
| Cre, mg/dL | ||||
| Cre ≥ 7.5 | ||||
| Cre < 7.5 | −10.48 (−15.84, −5.11) | < 0.001 | ||
| Pre-BUN, mg/dL | ||||
| Pre-BUN < 20 | ||||
| Pre-BUN ≥ 20 | 3.73 (−1.33, 8.79) | 0.147 | ||
| RBC, 106/μL | −1.22 (−5.15, 2.72) | 0.543 | ||
| Hct, % | −0.15 (−0.61, 0.31) | 0.519 | ||
| WBC, 103/µL | −0.61 (−1.70, 0.48) | 0.270 | ||
| TP, mg/dL | −0.50 (−4.03, 3.03) | 0.781 | ||
| Adjusted R square | 0.183 | |||
Abbreviations: KDQOL, kidney disease quality of life; B, regression coefficient; CI, confidence interval; BMI, body mass index; WC, waist circumference; HD, hemodialysis; SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; Hgb, hemoglobin; Alb, albumin; Cre, creatinine; pre-BUN, pre-dialysis blood urea nitrogen; RBC, red blood cells; Hct, hematocrit; WBC, white blood cells; TP, total protein. *: Monthly income was classified into below the poverty line (<1.0 million VND/month for rural areas, <1.3 million VND/month for urban areas), and above the poverty line (≥1.0 million VND/month for rural areas, ≥1.3 million VND/month for urban areas). **: Abdominal obesity was defined as WC ≥ 90 for men or ≥80 for women, respectively.
© 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
MDPI and ACS Style
Doan, K.V.D.; Nguyen, H.T.M.; Nguyen, N.T.H.; Dang, K.C.; Yang, S.-H.; Duong, T.V. Associations of Socio-Demographic, Clinical and Biochemical Parameters with Healthcare Cost, Health- and Renal-Related Quality of Life in Hemodialysis Patients: A Clinical Observational Study. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 6552. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186552
AMA Style
Doan KVD, Nguyen HTM, Nguyen NTH, Dang KC, Yang S-H, Duong TV. Associations of Socio-Demographic, Clinical and Biochemical Parameters with Healthcare Cost, Health- and Renal-Related Quality of Life in Hemodialysis Patients: A Clinical Observational Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020; 17(18):6552. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186552
Chicago/Turabian StyleDoan, Khanh Vuong Diem, Hien Thi Minh Nguyen, Nhi Thi Hong Nguyen, Khoa Cao Dang, Shwu-Huey Yang, and Tuyen Van Duong. 2020. "Associations of Socio-Demographic, Clinical and Biochemical Parameters with Healthcare Cost, Health- and Renal-Related Quality of Life in Hemodialysis Patients: A Clinical Observational Study" International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 17, no. 18: 6552. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17186552
Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.
