Previous Article in Journal
Hybrid Alginate–Graphene Composites: Biochemical Features and Biomedical Potential
Previous Article in Special Issue
Sustainable Extraction of Prospective Cosmetic Ingredients from Colombian Marine Macroalgae Using Natural Deep Eutectic Solvents
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Unraveling of Seaweed Bioactive Substances and Their Nutritional Regulation Functions for Poultry

1
Department of Animal Science, College of Coastal Agricultural Sciences, Guangdong Ocean University, Zhanjiang 524088, China
2
Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, College of Life Science, Sejong University, Seoul 05006, Republic of Korea
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Mar. Drugs 2025, 23(8), 324; https://doi.org/10.3390/md23080324
Submission received: 11 July 2025 / Revised: 8 August 2025 / Accepted: 9 August 2025 / Published: 10 August 2025

Abstract

Seaweed is a rich and valuable marine biological resource that contains various bioactive substances, including polysaccharides, polyphenols, fatty acids, and more. These compounds exhibit a range of biological activities, such as antimicrobial, antioxidant, and immunomodulation effects. In the face of challenges related to intensive farming, poultry are often exposed to multiple stressors during production, which can lead to oxidative stress, impaired intestinal barrier function, and excessive inflammatory responses. Due to their potent biological activities, seaweeds and their bioactive components have shown potential in improving poultry health and performance. This paper mainly reviews the classification of seaweeds and their extracts, their main biological functions, and the research progress on the application to poultry, with the aim of providing a reference for the research and application of seaweed active substances as functional feed additives in poultry.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Seaweeds, a group of photosynthetic autotrophs widely distributed in aquatic environments, are an important component of marine biological resources. According to the report “The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2024” published by the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), the global annual production of algae has reached 3.78 × 107 tons in 2022. China has a coastline of approximately 32,000 km, with Guangdong Province possessing the longest coastline of about 4114.3 km, providing it with a rich endowment of seaweed resources. Based on pigment characteristics, seaweeds are primarily classified into three phyla: brown algae, red algae and green algae. Numerous studies have demonstrated that bioactive compounds extracted from seaweeds, such as polysaccharides, polyphenols, and fatty acids, possess antioxidant, antibacterial, and immunomodulatory properties [1,2,3]. Currently, the poultry industry faces multiple challenges, including the prohibition of adding antibiotics to feed [4], stress associated with intensive farming [5,6] and feed contamination by mycotoxins [7]. However, due to their abundance and diverse bioactive ingredients, seaweeds have shown promising potential in promoting healthy poultry production. For example, seaweed polysaccharides have been shown to alleviate oxidative stress and excessive inflammatory responses in heat-stressed broilers [8], red algae extracts reduce egg-yolk cholesterol [9], and green algae enhance the poultry intestinal immune barrier by modulating gut microbiota [10]. With the growing global emphasis on “antibiotic-free husbandry” and “green feed” initiatives, the application value of seaweeds and their bioactive components in the livestock and poultry industry has garnered significant scholarly attention, with research focus particularly intensifying in the field of poultry production. To date, a number of review studies have been conducted on the relationship between seaweed and poultry farming, providing a foundational basis for the development of this field. Nevertheless, existing reviews exhibit notable limitations: on the one hand, the majority of studies concentrate on single aspects, such as seaweed-processing technologies [11], their incorporation as feed ingredients in poultry diets [12], impacts on meat quality [13], or antimicrobial properties [14]; on the other hand, some studies cover a scope of livestock [15,16] and humans [17,18], and fail to conduct specific analyses tailored to poultry. Again, other existing reviews focus on the analysis of the roles of seaweed powder or a certain type of seaweed in broiler chickens [19,20]. Consequently, this review mainly discusses the classification and biological functions of seaweeds and their active substances, summarizes recent research progress on their roles in poultry nutrition regulation, and provides a more systematic theoretical framework for the application of seaweeds and their active components in poultry production.

2. Classification and Biological Functions of Seaweeds and Their Active Substances

Seaweeds can be categorized based on the analysis of the chemical composition in Table 1. The highest protein content is found in red algae, the lowest lipid content and the highest carbohydrate content in brown algae, and the lowest dietary fiber content in green algae. In another study, it was found that the crude protein (CP) content of red algae was similar to the CP content of soybean meal-based high-protein plant feeds [21]. A study has confirmed that the active substances in seaweed have multiple biological activities, such as antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and immunomodulatory activities [22], which have broad application prospects in the fields of medicine, food [17,23] and agriculture [24] (Figure 1). However, in many poultry studies, seaweed, used as a feed ingredient, is susceptible to adverse effects such as high salt content and anti-nutritional factors. Various processing methods are required to eliminate these anti-nutritional factors, to optimize the use of seaweed in poultry feed [11]. Additionally, due to environmental factors, seaweed is prone to accumulating heavy metals. Therefore, when adding seaweed bioactive substances to poultry feed, it is essential to strictly control their dosage to avoid adverse effects on poultry such as bodily damage, heavy-metal accumulation, and nutritional imbalance [15,25,26].

2.1. Polysaccharides

As shown in Figure 2, seaweed polysaccharides are macromolecular polymers consisting of glycosidic bonds, sugar chains, sulfated groups, and glucuronic acid, which have a variety of biological activities such as antioxidant, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and immunomodulatory (Table 2) [27,28]. At present, synthetic antioxidants [e.g., butylated hydroxytoluene (BHT)] are commonly used in China’s feed industry as an effective means of scavenging free radicals from the organism, but their potential genotoxicity (e.g., BHT-induced abnormalities in liver microsomal enzymes) limits their safety [29]. Seaweed polysaccharides exhibit excellent antioxidant activity in vivo and in vitro [30]. Seaweed polysaccharides can not only achieve antioxidant effects by directly scavenging free radicals and regulating antioxidant enzymes [e.g., superoxide dismutase (SOD), catalase (CAT)] activities, but also regulate apoptosis-related signaling pathways (e.g., Caspase-9, Bax, and JNK) to repair the oxidative damage of the organism [30,31]. In terms of immunomodulation, fucoidan can activate macrophages and regulate cytokine secretion through NF-κB and ERK/MAPK signaling pathways [32,33]. Ulva polysaccharide can effectively restore leukocyte and platelet levels in immunodeficiency models, enhance NK cell activity and remodel the anti-tumor immune microenvironment [34]. In animal experiments, feeding 1 g/kg of Enteromorpha polysaccharides (EP) can enhance nonspecific immunity and promote the growth and health of animals [35]. In terms of anti-inflammation, short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) generated by microbial fermentation of seaweed polysaccharides in the intestinal tract exert a systemic anti-inflammatory effect by regulating the balance of bacterial flora and metabolism to reduce inflammatory bowel disease [36]. Meanwhile, it has been suggested that seaweed polysaccharides could alleviate the excessive inflammatory response of the organism by inhibiting the activation of the MAPK/NF-κB pathway [37].

2.2. Polyphenols

At the present time, the main research on polyphenols has focused on phlorotannins [45]. The phlorotannins are polymers formed by C-O or C-C bonds with m-Phloroglucinol as the basic structural unit, and their unique chemical conformation endows them with diversified biological functions [46], including antibacterial [47], anti-inflammatory [48], antioxidant [49], and anti-diabetic [50], and they belong to the category of low-toxicity chemical compounds [51]. Gallic acid and Apigenin in Gracilaria birdiae and Gracilaria cornea can scavenge DPPH free radicals and reduce reactive oxygen species (ROS) production by inhibiting NADPH oxidase [52]. The phenolic extracts from Ascophyllum nodosum and Alaria esculenta have been shown to lower blood glucose levels and inhibit the proliferation of cancer cells, respectively. These findings could provide new strategies for the treatment of diabetes and the fight against tumors [53]. Adding 600 mg/kg of phlorotannin to broiler diets can effectively alleviate liver injury. Its regulatory mechanism can be divided into two main aspects: one is to inhibit heat stress-induced iron hepatic ferroptosis by regulating the redox homeostasis of broilers [54]; the other is to mitigate Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1)-induced hepatic oxidative stress and mitochondrial damage by activating the Nrf2-mediated phase II detoxifying enzyme pathway (e.g., GPX1, GSTT1) and the Nrf1-regulated mitochondrial biosynthesis pathway (e.g., TFAM, MFN1) [55]. Despite the wide application of polyphenols, the instability of m-Phloroglucinol makes its extraction difficult. Novel extraction methods, such as ultrasound, microwave, pressurized liquid, pulsed electric field, supercritical fluid, and high hydrostatic pressure, can not only significantly increase the extraction rate of polyphenols, but also reduce extraction costs and minimize environmental impact [56].

2.3. Protein and Amino Acids

Currently, dietary proteins mainly rely on animal sources (e.g., meat, dairy products) and terrestrial plant sources (e.g., soybeans, peas). A study has shown that the CP content of brown algae (e.g., Saccharina) and red algae (e.g., Gracilaria) can reach 25–47% of the dry weight, comparable to traditional plant proteins like soybean meal (approximately 40%) and peas (approximately 25%), and their amino acid composition is balanced [57]. Moreover, seaweed as an alternative protein source in poultry nutrition can not only effectively reduce feed costs, but also improve the productivity of the poultry industry [58]. However, the digestibility of seaweed proteins in monogastric animals (e.g., poultry, swine) ranges from 40% to 60%, which is insufficient to meet the essential amino acid requirements of these animals [59]. Additionally, the nutritional and functional composition of algae varies across species, seasons, and coastal environments, making the use of seaweed proteins in poultry production challenging, in several ways [60].

2.4. Fatty Acids

The fatty acid composition of seaweed mainly consists of saturated fatty acids (SFAs), monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFAs) and polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs). Among them, PUFA is the core component of the functional activity of seaweed lipids. The content and distribution of fatty acids are synergistically regulated by seaweed species, growth environment, and developmental stage [61]. Specifically, the eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) content of red algae (e.g., Porphyra) accounted for 48.0–51.0% of the fatty acid methyl ester (FAME), while arachidonic acid and linoleic acid accounted for 2.1–10.9% and 1.3–2.5%, respectively. Brown algae (e.g., Laminaria) were dominated by oleic, linoleic, and α-linolenic acids, which accounted for 4.1–20.9%, 4.0–7.3% and 3.6–13.8%, respectively, and the EPA content was only 5.9–13.6% [62]. In the field of food science, seaweed fatty acids can be used as natural antioxidants, nutritional enhancers and functional food additives [63]. Fucoxanthin derived from brown algae can not only reduce obesity-related oxidative stress and inflammatory status by regulating gene expression in adipocytes, but also effectively alleviate renal aging, demonstrating anti-aging potential [64,65]. Furthermore, seaweed fatty acids have multidimensional applications in the development of pharmaceuticals and nutraceuticals, including regulation of lipid metabolism homeostasis, maintenance of blood pressure homeostasis, and anti-fatigue activity [18,66]. Research reveals that fucoxanthin improves insulin resistance and blood glucose levels through the dual mechanism of promoting energy consumption in abdominal white adipose tissue and regulating the secretion of adipokines, thus exerting anti-obesity and anti-diabetic effects [67].

3. Seaweeds and Their Bioactive Substances in Poultry Production

With their unique bioactive components and multi-target regulatory properties, seaweeds have become a research hotspot for functional feed additives in poultry [12,68]. Numerous studies have confirmed the ability of seaweed to synergistically enhance poultry growth performance and product quality, as well as strengthen the body’s immunity and antioxidant capacity [14,16,19,69].

3.1. Beneficial Effects of Seaweed Bioactive Substances in Broiler Chickens

3.1.1. Improve Growth Performance

The broiler farming industry has long faced production problems [70], such as mycotoxin contamination [71], antibiotic resistance [72] and heat stress [73]. Studies have found that seaweed polysaccharides alleviate heat stress-induced bursa cell apoptosis and intestinal inflammatory responses by regulating the NF-κB signaling pathway and Th1/Th2 immune balance [74,75]. In the field of antibiotic substitution, the addition of seaweed polysaccharides can promote body weight gain, enhance immune capacity, and reduce the incidence rate in broiler chickens by regulating gene expression and influencing the activity of proteins and enzymes [10,76]. Moreover, its effect is comparable to that of antibiotic growth promoters [77]. It can be seen from Table 3 that the applied research on seaweed bioactive substances in broiler production has formed systematic achievements. Further interpretation of their core values is reflected in multiple functions such as mycotoxin detoxification, antibiotic substitution, and heat stress relief [78]. Additionally, seaweeds are also effective for other poultry, such as quails. Supplementation with 2% Sargassum siliquastrum increases the concentrations of total volatile fatty acids (VFAs) and propionic acid, elevates the count of Lactobacillus sp., and reduces the numbers of Escherichia coli (E. coli) and Clostridium perfringens. These effects help to regulate the cecal microbial community and fermentation characteristics, thereby enhancing antioxidant and immune functions [79]. Adding seaweeds to the poultry diet can also improve the palatability of feed and increase the feed intake of broilers [80]. For example, incorporating Polysiphonia sp. into feed formulations helps reduce feed hardness, which is particularly suitable for the preparation of duck feed and granular binders [81]. Although seaweeds can serve as components of broiler feed and have high nutritional value, the problem of their high ash content still needs to be addressed through pretreatment, to improve digestibility for efficient utilization [82].

3.1.2. Improve Meat Quality

In addition to promoting growth performance, seaweed used as a feed additive can also enhance the meat quality of broilers [13,93]. Firstly, seaweeds can significantly modify the muscle fatty acid composition in broilers by regulating lipid metabolism pathways, increasing the content of PUFA, and thus improving meat color [94]. Secondly, as a functional additive, green algae is rich in various bioactive ingredients (e.g., proteins, polysaccharides, vitamins, etc.) and has a balanced amino acid profile, offering multiple advantages in broiler production. On the one hand, green algae can reduce heavy-metal bioaccumulation, helping to overcome barriers to commercial application [95]. On the other hand, its antioxidant constituents inhibit microbial growth in meat, delay oxidative reactions, and significantly improve various aspects of meat quality, including color, tenderness, water-holding capacity, and nutritional value, while also extending shelf life [31,95]. Although the inclusion of green algae powder in broiler diets may slightly affect the overall feed conversion ratio, it does not negatively impact blood parameters, meat quality, or product stability [96]. Therefore, green algae hold promise as a sustainable and effective feed additive for improving broiler meat quality.

3.1.3. Promote Intestinal Barrier Function

The intestinal barrier is a core line of defense for maintaining broiler health and performance, and it plays a key role in resisting pathogen invasion, regulating nutrient absorption and maintaining intestinal homeostasis. However, Salmonella infection and heat stress are the main threatening factors which disrupt intestinal barrier function through multiple pathways: the former damages intestinal structure by inducing mucosal injury, inflammatory cascade reactions, and microbial flora imbalance; the latter leads to intestinal morphological abnormalities by inducing intestinal oxidative stress, inflammatory responses, and altering microbial diversity [5,97]. Against this backdrop, seaweeds, due to their unique bioactive components, provide an innovative solution for intestinal health regulation. Seaweed polysaccharides can alleviate intestinal inflammatory responses by regulating the NF-κB signaling pathway and Th1/Th2 immune balance, further promoting the intestinal immune barrier (Figure 3) [74]. Supplementation with 2000 mg/kg Gracilaria lemaneiformis polysaccharides can increase the content of lactic acid bacteria in the cecum, reduce the number of E. coli, and achieve synergistic improvement of immune barrier function [98]. Similarly, sodium alginate oligosaccharides also have the same effect [99]. In addition, dietary supplementation with brown algae powder and its extracts can enhance the abundance of beneficial microorganisms in the intestines of heat-stressed broiler chickens, improve intestinal morphology, and thus alleviate heat stress damage [100]. Supplementation of 1000–4000 mg/kg EP in poultry diets exhibits a dual protective effect: on the one hand, it significantly reduces serum diamine oxidase activity and serum D-lactate concentration. On the other hand, it enhances the mRNA expression of tight-junction proteins Occludin and ZO-1, improves the tight junctions in the duodenum, and further enhances intestinal barrier function [101]. This nutritional intervention not only helps maintain intestinal integrity, but also effectively alleviates intestinal inflammatory responses by regulating the Nrf2 and NF-κB signaling pathways [102]. In the study of Wassie et al. [10], it was found that supplementation of 400 mg/kg EP in the broiler diet significantly increased the VH and decreased the CD in the jejunum and ileum of broilers. Similarly, in the experiment by Sun et al. [103], it was found that supplementation with 3% EP significantly improved the nutrient utilization rate of the diet and the digestive enzyme activity in the intestines of broilers. In addition, dietary inclusion of 0.1% EP alleviates heat stress-induced tight-junction damage of intestinal epithelial cells in broilers by inhibiting the MLCK signaling pathway, reducing the phosphorylation modification level of MLC, and decreasing cytoskeleton sliding [73]. Therefore, the above observations indicate that EP improves the intestinal barrier function and nutrient absorption capacity, thereby playing a beneficial role in broiler production. Furthermore, molecular mechanism studies further reveal that marine sulfated polysaccharides (MSPs) can induce the expression of membrane-bound mucins (MUC1) and gel-forming mucins (MUC2 and MUC5AC), thereby promoting intestinal mucosal barrier function [104].

3.2. Beneficial Effects of Seaweed Active Substances in Laying Hens

3.2.1. Improve Egg-Production Performance

Seaweed bioactive components consistently enhance laying-hen production performance through multiple nutritional regulatory mechanisms, including metabolic pathway modulation, oxidative stress alleviation, and microbial homeostasis maintenance (Table 4). As detailed in Table 4, the core advantages of red algae lie in lipid reconstruction and reproductive regulation; green algae excel in antioxidant effects and intestinal function optimization; brown algae can powerfully intervene in cholesterol metabolism; and cyanobacteria mainly focus on protein metabolism and structural strengthening. In poultry production, seaweeds should be selected based on their characteristics and practical needs. In the late laying period, hens suffer from reduced production performance and egg quality, due to oxidative stress accumulated from long-term egg laying. Supplementation with seaweed polysaccharides can significantly reduce the crack egg rate and increase the egg production rate, thereby improving the production performance of hens in the late laying period [105]. In general, seaweeds are rich in proteins, vitamins, minerals, and essential fatty acids, which are crucial for the overall health of laying hens. Supplementation with seaweeds and their extracts not only boosts egg production and quality, but also enhances the health status of laying hens, providing an efficient and sustainable solution for laying-hen farming.

3.2.2. Improve Egg Quality

Seaweeds and their extracts can regulate egg quality through multiple levels, including the reconstruction of nutritional components, regulation of biomineralization, and modulation of metabolic pathways. Dietary supplementation with seaweeds has been shown to reduce cholesterol content in eggs, increase the levels of n-3 PUFA and iodine, and improve yolk coloration [94]. For example, adding 6% Sargassum powder to the diet of laying hens can increase the iodine content in eggs [113]. The addition of Spirulina can significantly increase the eggshell thickness and has a liver-protective effect on laying hens [112]. Supplementation with Sargassum extract (SL-CaNps) (up to 1.5 g/kg diet) not only increases the serum calcium and phosphorus concentrations, but also significantly improves eggshell thickness, eggshell weight per unit area, and the ultrastructure of eggshells [114]. Moreover, supplementation with 1% Chondrus crispus and 1% Sarcodiotheca gaudichaudii in the laying-hen diet can both increase yolk weight and egg weight [115]. Meanwhile, seaweed polysaccharides can synergistically improve yolk color and eggshell quality [105]. Therefore, seaweeds and their extracts can be used as potential nutritional regulators for egg quality. However, based on food safety considerations, attention should be paid to the accumulation of toxic and harmful substances in seaweeds [116], and safe and efficient application can be achieved through pretreatment.

4. Conclusions and Future Prospects

As a natural and effective feed additive, seaweed-derived active substances not only enhance poultry production performance, intestinal barrier function, disease resistance, and antioxidant capacity, but also improve the quality of meat and egg products. Furthermore, seaweed powder offers a potential alternative to traditional protein sources, thereby reducing the environmental pressure associated with livestock farming. Supplementing poultry diets with seaweed extracts also helps mitigate heat stress challenges during growth, which is significant for poultry health and sustainable production. However, the application of seaweeds and their active substances in poultry production still faces many challenges. For instance, high ash content, variable digestibility, and the potential for heavy-metal bioaccumulation in seaweeds can limit their practical use. In addition, while this review summarizes the primary mechanisms of seaweed actives in poultry involved in exerting anti-inflammatory, intestinal health-regulating, and antioxidant effects by regulating signaling pathways such as NF-κB, ERK, MAPKs, MLCK, and Nrf2, the specific molecular mechanisms of their actions need further in-depth study. Simultaneously, the structural diversity of seaweed actives from different sources and extraction methods is considerable, and systematic research on their structure–activity relationships is lacking. Therefore, ongoing research in this field remains imperative, to facilitate the utilization of seaweed resources in the poultry industry.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.-B.L. and W.-C.L.; methodology, Q.-H.Y. and X.-Q.Y.; investigation, S.-B.L. and W.-C.L.; writing—original draft preparation, S.-B.L.; writing—review and editing, B.B. and W.-C.L.; supervision, B.B. and W.-C.L.; funding acquisition, W.-C.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Guangdong Feed Industry Technology System (2024CXTD14), the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (2024A1515012201), and the Characteristic Innovation Project of the Guangdong Provincial Department of Education (2024KTSCX198).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Figdraw (www.figdraw.com) for figure creation. The authors are deeply grateful for the help from senior colleagues and the contributions of all reviewers and editors. The authors sincerely thank the peer reviewers for all their meticulous and constructive suggestions, which have enhanced the scientific validity and rigor of the article. In addition, special appreciation is extended to the editors for their guidance and reminders throughout the review process, ensuring that the article meets academic standards and publication requirements.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Peñalver, R.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Ros, G.; Amarowicz, R.; Pateiro, M.; Nieto, G. Seaweeds as a Functional Ingredient for a Healthy Diet. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. El-Beltagi, H.S.; Mohamed, A.A.; Mohamed, H.I.; Ramadan, K.M.A.; Barqawi, A.A.; Mansour, A.T. Phytochemical and Potential Properties of Seaweeds and Their Recent Applications: A Review. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Michalak, I.; Chojnacka, K. Algae as production systems of bioactive compounds. Eng. Life Sci. 2015, 15, 160–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tian, M.; He, X.; Feng, Y.; Wang, W.; Chen, H.; Gong, M.; Liu, D.; Clarke, J.L.; Van Eerde, A. Pollution by Antibiotics and Antimicrobial Resistance in LiveStock and Poultry Manure in China, and Countermeasures. Antibiotics 2021, 10, 539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rostagno, M.H. Effects of heat stress on the gut health of poultry. J. Anim. Sci. 2020, 98, skaa090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Oke, O.E.; Akosile, O.A.; Oni, A.I.; Opowoye, I.O.; Ishola, C.A.; Adebiyi, J.O.; Odeyemi, A.J.; Adjei-Mensah, B.; Uyanga, V.A.; Abioja, M.O. Oxidative stress in poultry production. Poult. Sci. 2024, 103, 104003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yang, C.; Song, G.; Lim, W. Effects of mycotoxin-contaminated feed on farm animals. J. Hazard. Mater. 2020, 389, 122087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, W.C.; Zhuang, D.P.; Zhao, Y.; Balasubramanian, B.; Zhao, Z.H. Seaweed-Derived Polysaccharides Attenuate Heat Stress-Induced Splenic Oxidative Stress and Inflammatory Response via Regulating Nrf2 and NF-κB Signaling Pathways. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mandal, A.B.; Biswas, A.; Mir, N.A.; Tyagi, P.K.; Kapil, D.; Biswas, A.K. Effects of dietary supplementation of Kappaphycus alvarezii on productive performance and egg quality traits of laying hens. J. Appl. Phycol. 2018, 31, 2065–2072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wassie, T.; Lu, Z.; Duan, X.; Xie, C.; Gebeyew, K.; Yumei, Z.; Yin, Y.; Wu, X. Dietary Enteromorpha Polysaccharide Enhances Intestinal Immune Response, Integrity, and Caecal Microbial Activity of Broiler Chickens. Front. Nutr. 2021, 8, 783819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Dewi, Y.L.; Sofyan, A.; Herdian, H.; Sakti, A.A.; Irawan, A.; Jasmadi, J.; Anggraeni, A.S.; Mardawati, E.; Adriyanto, A.; Mahata, M.E.; et al. Processing technology to improve seaweed nutritional quality as a feed for poultry: A review and its implementation. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 2024, 80, 207–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Michalak, I.; Mahrose, K. Seaweeds, Intact and Processed, as a Valuable Component of Poultry Feeds. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, 620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ribeiro, D.M.; Martins, C.F.; Costa, M.; Coelho, D.; Pestana, J.; Alfaia, C.; Lordelo, M.; De Almeida, A.M.; Freire, J.P.B.; Prates, J.a.M. Quality Traits and Nutritional Value of Pork and Poultry Meat from Animals Fed with Seaweeds. Foods 2021, 10, 2961. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Haberecht, S.; Wilkinson, S.; Roberts, J.; Wu, S.; Swick, R. Unlocking the potential health and growth benefits of macroscopic algae for poultry. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 2018, 74, 5–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Makkar, H.P.S.; Tran, G.; Heuzé, V.; Giger-Reverdin, S.; Lessire, M.; Lebas, F.; Ankers, P. Seaweeds for livestock diets: A review. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 2016, 212, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Morais, T.; Inácio, A.; Coutinho, T.; Ministro, M.; Cotas, J.; Pereira, L.; Bahcevandziev, K. Seaweed Potential in the Animal Feed: A Review. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, 559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Kasimala, M.; Mebrahtu, L.; Magoha, P.; Asgedom, G. A Review on biochemical composition and nutritional aspects of Seaweeds. Caribb. J. Sci. 2015, 3, 789–797. [Google Scholar]
  18. Ganesan, A.R.; Tiwari, U.; Rajauria, G. Seaweed nutraceuticals and their therapeutic role in disease prevention. Food Sci. Hum. Wellness 2019, 8, 252–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Andri, F.; Dono, N.D.; Sasongko, H.; Zuprizal, Z. The effects of dietary seaweed inclusion on growth performance of broiler chickens: A systematic review and meta-analysis. F1000Research 2020, 9, 1087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Abudabos, A.M.; Okab, A.B.; Aljumaah, R.S.; Samara, E.M.; Abdoun, K.A.; Al-Haidary, A.A. Nutritional Value of Green Seaweed (Ulva lactuca) for Broiler Chickens. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2016, 12, e28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Min, B.R.; Parker, D.; Brauer, D.; Waldrip, H.; Lockard, C.; Hales, K.; Akbay, A.; Augyte, S. The role of seaweed as a potential dietary supplementation for enteric methane mitigation in ruminants: Challenges and opportunities. Anim. Nutr. 2021, 7, 1371–1387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Mandal, A.K.; Parida, S.; Behera, A.K.; Adhikary, S.P.; Lukatkin, A.A.; Lukatkin, A.S.; Jena, M. Seaweed in the Diet as a Source of Bioactive Metabolites and a Potential Natural Immunity Booster: A Comprehensive Review. Pharmaceuticals 2025, 18, 367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Ullah, R.; Akhter, M.; Khan, B.S.; Hasan, M.; Bosu, A.; Yasmin, F.; Haque, M.A.; Islam, A.; Mahmud, Y. Seaweed: A prominent source of protein and other nutrients. Sustain. Aquat. Res. 2023, 2, 145–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fleurence, J. Perspectives on the Use of Algae in Agriculture and Animal Production. Phycology 2021, 1, 79–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Rengasamy, K.R.R.; Mahomoodally, M.F.; Aumeeruddy, M.Z.; Zengin, G.; Xiao, J.; Kim, D.H. Bioactive compounds in seaweeds: An overview of their biological properties and safety. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2020, 135, 111013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Huang, L.; Lee, J.-Y.; Park, Y.-K.; Lee, J. Heavy metals in seaweed: Implications for health benefits, risks, and safety regulations. J. Agric. Food Res. 2025, 21, 101830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xie, C.; Lee, Z.J.; Ye, S.; Barrow, C.J.; Dunshea, F.R.; Suleria, H.a.R. A Review on Seaweeds and Seaweed-Derived Polysaccharides: Nutrition, Chemistry, Bioactivities, and Applications. Food Rev. Int. 2023, 40, 1312–1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Tanna, B.; Mishra, A. Nutraceutical Potential of Seaweed Polysaccharides: Structure, Bioactivity, Safety, and Toxicity. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2019, 18, 817–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Kumar, K.S.; Ganesan, K.; Rao, P.V.S. Antioxidant potential of solvent extracts of Kappaphycus alvarezii (Doty) Doty—An edible seaweed. Food Chem. 2008, 107, 289–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Liu, Z.W.; Sun, X. A Critical Review of the Abilities, Determinants, and Possible Molecular Mechanisms of Seaweed Polysaccharides Antioxidants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7774. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Michalak, I.; Tiwari, R.; Dhawan, M.; Alagawany, M.; Farag, M.R.; Sharun, K.; Emran, T.B.; Dhama, K. Antioxidant effects of seaweeds and their active compounds on animal health and production—A review. Vet. Q. 2022, 42, 48–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Saeed, M.; Arain, M.A.; Ali Fazlani, S.; Marghazani, I.B.; Umar, M.; Soomro, J.; Bhutto, Z.A.; Soomro, F.; Noreldin, A.E.; Abd El-Hack, M.E.; et al. A comprehensive review on the health benefits and nutritional significance of fucoidan polysaccharide derived from brown seaweeds in human, animals and aquatic organisms. Aquacult. Nutr. 2021, 27, 633–654. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jayawardena, T.U.; Nagahawatta, D.P.; Fernando, I.P.S.; Kim, Y.-T.; Kim, J.-S.; Kim, W.-S.; Lee, J.S.; Jeon, Y.-J. A Review on Fucoidan Structure, Extraction Techniques, and Its Role as an Immunomodulatory Agent. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Gao, X.; Qu, H.; Gao, Z.; Zeng, D.; Wang, J.; Baranenko, D.; Li, Y.; Lu, W. Protective effects of Ulva pertusa polysaccharide and polysaccharide-iron (III) complex on cyclophosphamide induced immunosuppression in mice. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 133, 911–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Liu, W.C.; Zhou, S.H.; Balasubramanian, B.; Zeng, F.Y.; Sun, C.B.; Pang, H.Y. Dietary seaweed (Enteromorpha) polysaccharides improves growth performance involved in regulation of immune responses, intestinal morphology and microbial community in banana shrimp Fenneropenaeus merguiensis. Fish Shellfish. Immunol. 2020, 104, 202–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Morrison, D.J.; Preston, T. Formation of short chain fatty acids by the gut microbiota and their impact on human metabolism. Gut Microbes 2016, 7, 189–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Matin, M.; Koszarska, M.; Atanasov, A.G.; Król-Szmajda, K.; Jóźwik, A.; Stelmasiak, A.; Hejna, M. Bioactive Potential of Algae and Algae-Derived Compounds: Focus on Anti-Inflammatory, Antimicrobial, and Antioxidant Effects. Molecules 2024, 29, 4695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Rupert, R.; Rodrigues, K.F.; Thien, V.Y.; Yong, W.T.L. Carrageenan from Kappaphycus alvarezii (Rhodophyta, Solieriaceae): Metabolism, structure, production, and application. Front. Plant Sci. 2022, 13, 859635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Lee, W.-K.; Lim, Y.-Y.; Leow, A.T.-C.; Namasivayam, P.; Ong Abdullah, J.; Ho, C.-L. Biosynthesis of agar in red seaweeds: A review. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 164, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Li, B.; Lu, F.; Wei, X.J.; Zhao, R.X. Fucoidan: Structure and Bioactivity. Molecules 2008, 13, 1671–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Cardoso, M.J.; Costa, R.R.; Mano, J.F. Marine Origin Polysaccharides in Drug Delivery Systems. Mar. Drugs 2016, 14, 34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Szekalska, M.; Puciłowska, A.; Szymańska, E.; Ciosek, P.; Winnicka, K. Alginate: Current Use and Future Perspectives in Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Applications. Int. J. Polym. Sci. 2016, 2016, 7697031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Yu, Y.; Li, Y.; Du, C.; Mou, H.; Wang, P. Compositional and structural characteristics of sulfated polysaccharide from Enteromorpha prolifera. Carbohydr. Polym. 2017, 165, 221–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Liu, Y.; Wu, X.; Jin, W.; Guo, Y. Immunomodulatory Effects of a Low-Molecular Weight Polysaccharide from Enteromorpha prolifera on RAW 264.7 Macrophages and Cyclophosphamide- Induced Immunosuppression Mouse Models. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Catarino, M.D.; Silva, A.M.S.; Cardoso, S.M. Fucaceae: A Source of Bioactive Phlorotannins. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18, 1327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cotas, J.; Leandro, A.; Monteiro, P.; Pacheco, D.; Figueirinha, A.; Gonçalves, A.M.M.; Da Silva, G.J.; Pereira, L. Seaweed Phenolics: From Extraction to Applications. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ford, L.; Stratakos, A.C.; Theodoridou, K.; Dick, J.T.A.; Sheldrake, G.N.; Linton, M.; Corcionivoschi, N.; Walsh, P.J. Polyphenols from Brown Seaweeds as a Potential Antimicrobial Agent in Animal Feeds. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 9093–9103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Besednova, N.N.; Andryukov, B.G.; Zaporozhets, T.S.; Kuznetsova, T.A.; Kryzhanovsky, S.P.; Ermakova, S.P.; Galkina, I.V.; Shchelkanov, M.Y. Molecular Targets of Brown Algae Phlorotannins for the Therapy of Inflammatory Processes of Various Origins. Mar. Drugs 2022, 20, 243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Namvar, F.; Mohamad, R.; Baharara, J.; Zafar-Balanejad, S.; Fargahi, F.; Rahman, H.S. Antioxidant, Antiproliferative, and Antiangiogenesis Effects of Polyphenol-Rich Seaweed (Sargassum muticum). BioMed Res. Int. 2013, 2013, 604787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhang, J.Z.; Tiller, C.; Shen, J.K.; Wang, C.; Girouard, G.S.; Dennis, D.; Barrow, C.J.; Miao, M.; Ewart, H.S. Antidiabetic properties of polysaccharide- and polyphenolic-enriched fractions from the brown seaweed Ascophyllum nodosum. Can. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2007, 85, 1116–1123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Imbs, T.I.; Zvyagintseva, T.N. Phlorotannins are Polyphenolic Metabolites of Brown Algae. Russ. J. Mar. Biol. 2018, 44, 263–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Souza, B.W.S.; Cerqueira, M.A.; Martins, J.T.; Quintas, M.a.C.; Ferreira, A.C.S.; Teixeira, J.A.; Vicente, A.A. Antioxidant Potential of Two Red Seaweeds from the Brazilian Coasts. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2011, 59, 5589–5594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Nwosu, F.; Morris, J.; Lund, V.A.; Stewart, D.; Ross, H.A.; Mcdougall, G.J. Anti-proliferative and potential anti-diabetic effects of phenolic-rich extracts from edible marine algae. Food Chem. 2011, 126, 1006–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Zhao, Z.X.; Yuan, Y.M.; Zhao, Z.H.; Yao, Q.H.; Ye, X.Q.; Wang, Y.Y.; Liu, H.M.; Jha, R.; Balasubramanian, B.; Liu, W.C. Phlorotannin Alleviates Liver Injury by Regulating Redox Balance, Apoptosis, and Ferroptosis of Broilers under Heat Stress. Antioxidants 2024, 13, 1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Ye, X.Q.; Yang, Y.Y.; Yao, Q.H.; Huang, M.Y.; Balasubramanian, B.; Jha, R.; Liu, W.C. The ameliorative role of phlorotannin on aflatoxin B1-induced liver oxidative stress and mitochondrial injury is related to the activation of Nrf2 and Nrf1 signaling pathways in broilers. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2025, 16, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Suwal, S.; Marciniak, A. Technologies for the Extraction, Separation and Purification of polyphenols—A Review. Nepal J. Biotechnol. 2019, 6, 74–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Fleurence, J.; Morançais, M.; Dumay, J. 9—Seaweed proteins. In Proteins in Food Processing, 2nd ed.; Yada, R.Y., Ed.; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2018; pp. 245–262. [Google Scholar]
  58. Alemu, S.; Abrar, B. Utilization of Algae Based-Meal as an Alternative Protein Source in Poultry Nutrition: A Review. Am. J. Zool. 2025, 8, 50–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Angell, A.R.; Angell, S.F.; De Nys, R.; Paul, N.A. Seaweed as a protein source for mono-gastric livestock. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2016, 54, 74–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wells, M.L.; Potin, P.; Craigie, J.S.; Raven, J.A.; Merchant, S.S.; Helliwell, K.E.; Smith, A.G.; Camire, M.E.; Brawley, S.H. Algae as nutritional and functional food sources: Revisiting our understanding. J. Appl. Phycol. 2017, 29, 949–982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Tabarsa, M.; Rezaei, M.; Ramezanpour, Z.; Robert Waaland, J.; Rabiei, R. Fatty Acids, Amino Acids, Mineral Contents, and Proximate Composition of Some Brown Seaweeds. J. Phycol. 2012, 48, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Dawczynski, C.; Schubert, R.; Jahreis, G. Amino acids, fatty acids, and dietary fibre in edible seaweed products. Food Chem. 2007, 103, 891–899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Rohani-Ghadikolaei, K.; Abdulalian, E.; Ng, W.-K. Evaluation of the proximate, fatty acid and mineral composition of representative green, brown and red seaweeds from the Persian Gulf of Iran as potential food and feed resources. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 49, 774–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Lakshminarayana, R.; Vijay, K.; Ambedkar, R.; Ranga Rao, A.; Ravishankar, G.A. Biological Activities and Health Benefits of Seaweed Carotenoids with Special Reference to Fucoxanthin. In Sustainable Global Resources of Seaweeds Volume 2: Food, Pharmaceutical and Health Applications; Ranga Rao, A., Ravishankar, G.A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2022; Volume 2, pp. 539–558. [Google Scholar]
  65. Zhang, X.; Qiang, W.; Guo, Y.; Gong, J.; Yu, H.; Wu, D.; Tang, P.; Yidan, M.; Zhang, H.; Sun, X. Fucoxanthin alleviates renal aging by regulating the oxidative stress process and the inflammatory response in vitro and in vivo models. Redox Rep. 2025, 30, 2511458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  66. Gosch, B.J.; Paul, N.A.; De Nys, R.; Magnusson, M. Seasonal and within-plant variation in fatty acid content and composition in the brown seaweed Spatoglossum macrodontum (Dictyotales, Phaeophyceae). J. Appl. Phycol. 2014, 27, 387–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Miyashita, K.; Mikami, N.; Hosokawa, M. Chemical and nutritional characteristics of brown seaweed lipids: A review. J. Funct. Foods 2013, 5, 1507–1517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Costa, M.; Cardoso, C.; Afonso, C.; Bandarra, N.M.; Prates, J.a.M. Current knowledge and future perspectives of the use of seaweeds for livestock production and meat quality: A systematic review. J. Anim. Physiol. Anim. Nutr. 2021, 105, 1075–1102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Kulshreshtha, G.; Hincke, M.T.; Prithiviraj, B.; Critchley, A. A Review of the Varied Uses of Macroalgae as Dietary Supplements in Selected Poultry with Special Reference to Laying Hen and Broiler Chickens. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 2020, 8, 536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Choi, J. Challenges in Poultry Production Systems and Nutritional Interventions. Animals 2025, 15, 530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ochieng, P.E.; Scippo, M.-L.; Kemboi, D.C.; Croubels, S.; Okoth, S.; Kang’ethe, E.K.; Doupovec, B.; Gathumbi, J.K.; Lindahl, J.F.; Antonissen, G. Mycotoxins in Poultry Feed and Feed Ingredients from Sub-Saharan Africa and Their Impact on the Production of Broiler and Layer Chickens: A Review. Toxins 2021, 13, 633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Szoke, Z.; Fauszt, P.; Mikolas, M.; David, P.; Szilagyi-Tolnai, E.; Pesti-Asboth, G.; Homoki, J.R.; Kovacs-Forgacs, I.; Gal, F.; Stundl, L.; et al. Comprehensive analysis of antimicrobial resistance dynamics among broiler and duck intensive production systems. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 4673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Kim, H.R.; Seong, P.; Seol, K.-H.; Park, J.-E.; Kim, H.; Park, W.; Cho, J.H.; Lee, S.D. Effects of heat stress on growth performance, physiological responses, and carcass traits in broilers. J. Therm. Biol. 2025, 127, 103994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Liu, W.C.; Liu, H.M.; Wang, Y.Y.; Zhao, Z.X.; Balasubramanian, B.; Jha, R. Effects of Enteromorpha prolifera polysaccharides on growth performance, intestinal barrier function and cecal microbiota in yellow-feathered broilers under heat stress. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol. 2023, 14, 132–149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Liu, W.C.; Ou, B.H.; Liang, Z.L.; Zhang, R.; Zhao, Z.H. Algae-derived polysaccharides supplementation ameliorates heat stress-induced impairment of bursa of Fabricius via modulating NF-κB signaling pathway in broilers. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 101139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Zhang, J.; Cai, K.; Mishra, R.; Jha, R. In ovo supplementation of chitooligosaccharide and chlorella polysaccharide affects cecal microbial community, metabolic pathways, and fermentation metabolites in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 4776–4785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Paul, S.S.; Ramasamy, K.T.; Rao Vantharam Venkata, H.G.; Rama Rao, S.V.; Lakshmi Narasimha Raju, M.V.; Ramanan, S.; Nori, S.S.; Suryanarayan, S.; Reddy, G.N.; Phani Kumar, P.S.; et al. Evaluation of the potential of extract of seaweed Eucheuma denticulatum as an alternative to antibiotic growth promoter in broiler chickens. Heliyon 2024, 10, e25219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Abdel-Wareth, A.a.A.; Williams, A.N.; Salahuddin, M.; Gadekar, S.; Lohakare, J. Algae as an alternative source of protein in poultry diets for sustainable production and disease resistance: Present status and future considerations. Front. Vet. Sci. 2024, 11, 1382163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Abu Hafsa, S.H.; Hassan, A.A. The Effect of Sargassum siliquastrum Supplementation on Growth Performance, Cecal Fermentation, Intestine Histomorphology, and Immune Response of Japanese Quails. Animals 2022, 12, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Mhlongo, G.; Mnisi, C.M. Effect of seaweed (Ecklonia maxima) on apparent nutrient digestibility, growth performance, and physiological and meat quality parameters in Boschveld cockerels. Poult. Sci. 2023, 102, 102361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. El-Deek, A.A.; Brikaa, M.A. Nutritional and Biological Evaluation of Marine Seaweed as a Feedstuff and as a Pellet Binder in Poultry Diet. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 2009, 8, 875–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Stokvis, L.; Van Krimpen, M.M.; Kwakkel, R.P.; Bikker, P. Evaluation of the nutritional value of seaweed products for broiler chickens’ nutrition. Anim. Feed. Sci. Technol. 2021, 280, 115061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Perali, C.; Magnoli, A.P.; Aronovich, M.; Rosa, C.a.D.R.; Cavaglieri, L.R. Lithothamnium calcareum (Pallas) Areschoug seaweed adsorbs aflatoxin B1 in vitro and improves broiler chicken’s performance. Mycotoxin Res. 2020, 36, 371–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Qadri, S.S.N.; Biswas, A.; Mandal, A.B.; Kumawat, M.; Saxena, R.; Nasir, A.M. Production performance, immune response and carcass traits of broiler chickens fed diet incorporated with Kappaphycus alvarezii. J. Appl. Phycol. 2018, 31, 753–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Balasubramanian, B.; Shanmugam, S.; Park, S.; Recharla, N.; Koo, J.S.; Andretta, I.; Kim, I.H. Supplemental Impact of Marine Red Seaweed (Halymenia palmata) on the Growth Performance, Total Tract Nutrient Digestibility, Blood Profiles, Intestine Histomorphology, Meat Quality, Fecal Gas Emission, and Microbial Counts in Broilers. Animals 2021, 11, 1244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Martínez, Y.; Ayala, L.; Hurtado, C.; Más, D.; Rodríguez, R. Effects of Dietary Supplementation with Red Algae Powder (Chondrus crispus) on Growth Performance, Carcass Traits, Lymphoid Organ Weights and Intestinal pH in Broilers. Braz. J. Poult. Sci. 2019, 21, eRBCA-2019-1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Olowe, O.S.; Johnson, T.; Adeola, O. Red seaweed Chondracanthus chamissoi supplementation improved the growth performance of broiler chickens partially through effects on intestinal morphology and cecal microbiota. Poult. Sci. 2025, 104, 105402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Choi, Y.J.; Lee, S.R.; Oh, J.W. Effects of dietary fermented seaweed and seaweed fusiforme on growth performance, carcass parameters and immunoglobulin concentration in broiler chicks. Asian-Australas. J. Anim. Sci. 2014, 27, 862–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Akinyemi, F.; Adewole, D. Effects of brown seaweed products on growth performance, plasma biochemistry, immune response, and antioxidant capacity of broiler chickens challenged with heat stress. Poult. Sci. 2022, 101, 102215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Liu, W.C.; Yang, Y.Y.; Pushparaj, K.; Balasubramanian, B. Evaluation of Hepatic Detoxification Effects of Enteromorpha prolifera Polysaccharides against Aflatoxin B1 in Broiler Chickens. Antioxidants 2022, 11, 1757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Guo, Y.; Balasubramanian, B.; Zhao, Z.H.; Liu, W.C. Marine algal polysaccharides alleviate aflatoxin B1-induced bursa of Fabricius injury by regulating redox and apoptotic signaling pathway in broilers. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 844–857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Zhao, Y.; Balasubramanian, B.; Guo, Y.; Qiu, S.J.; Jha, R.; Liu, W.C. Dietary Enteromorpha polysaccharides supplementation improves breast muscle yield and is associated with modification of mRNA transcriptome in broiler chickens. Front. Vet. Sci. 2021, 8, 663988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Matshogo, T.B.; Mlambo, V.; Mnisi, C.M.; Manyeula, F. Effect of pre-treating dietary green seaweed with fibrolytic enzymes on growth performance, blood indices, and meat quality parameters of Cobb 500 broiler chickens. Livest. Sci. 2021, 251, 104652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Coudert, E.; Baéza, E.; Berri, C. Use of algae in poultry production: A review. World’s Poult. Sci. J. 2020, 76, 767–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Purnamasari, L.; Carreon, J.M.; Dela Cruz, J.F. Benefits of Green Seaweed as Protein Source for Broiler: A Review. J. Livest. Sci. Prod. 2022, 6, 381–400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Matshogo, T.B.; Mnisi, C.M.; Mlambo, V. Dietary Green Seaweed Compromises Overall Feed Conversion Efficiency but not Blood Parameters and Meat Quality and Stability in Broiler Chickens. Agriculture 2020, 10, 547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Liu, W.C.; Pan, Z.Y.; Zhao, Y.; Guo, Y.; Qiu, S.J.; Balasubramanian, B.; Jha, R. Effects of heat stress on production performance, redox status, intestinal morphology and barrier-related gene expression, cecal microbiome, and metabolome in indigenous broiler chickens. Front. Physiol. 2022, 13, 890520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Jiang, S.W.; Yang, C.Y.; Xiao, Y.T.; Zheng, S.Z.; Jiang, Q.; Chen, J.S. Effects of Polysaccharides-Rich Extract from Gracilaria lemaneiformis on Growth Performance, Antioxidant Capacity, Immune Function, and Meat Quality in Broiler Chickens. J. Poult. Sci. 2023, 60, 2023018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Yan, G.L.; Guo, Y.M.; Yuan, J.M.; Liu, D.; Zhang, B.K. Sodium alginate oligosaccharides from brown algae inhibit Salmonella Enteritidis colonization in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 2011, 90, 1441–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Oretomiloye, F.; Adewole, D. Exploring the modulatory effects of brown seaweed meal and extracts on intestinal microbiota and morphology of broiler chickens challenged with heat stress. Poult. Sci. 2024, 103, 103562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Liu, W.C.; Guo, Y.; Zhao, Z.H.; Jha, R.; Balasubramanian, B. Algae-Derived Polysaccharides Promote Growth Performance by Improving Antioxidant Capacity and Intestinal Barrier Function in Broiler Chickens. Front. Vet. Sci. 2020, 7, 601336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Liu, W.C.; Zhu, Y.R.; Zhao, Z.H.; Jiang, P.; Yin, F.Q. Effects of Dietary Supplementation of Algae-Derived Polysaccharides on Morphology, Tight Junctions, Antioxidant Capacity and Immune Response of Duodenum in Broilers under Heat Stress. Animals 2021, 11, 2279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Sun, J.F.; Song, H.L.; Zhao, J.; Xiao, Y.; Qi, R.; Lin, Y.T. Effects of Different Dietary Levels of Enteromorpha prolifera on Nutrient Availability and Digestive Enzyme Activities of Broiler Chickens. Chin. J. Anim. Nutr. 2010, 22, 1658–1664. [Google Scholar]
  104. Hang, H.Y. Seaweed can Enhance the Integrity of the Chick’s Intestine. Anim. Sci. Abroad (Pigs Poult.) 2021, 41, 42–45. [Google Scholar]
  105. Guo, Y.; Zhao, Z.H.; Pan, Z.Y.; An, L.L.; Balasubramanian, B.; Liu, W.C. New insights into the role of dietary marine-derived polysaccharides on productive performance, egg quality, antioxidant capacity, and jejunal morphology in late-phase laying hens. Poult. Sci. 2020, 99, 2100–2107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Nunes, A.; Azevedo, G.Z.; De Souza Dutra, F.; Dos Santos, B.R.; Schneider, A.R.; Oliveira, E.R.; Moura, S.; Vianello, F.; Maraschin, M.; Lima, G.P.P. Uses and applications of the red seaweed Kappaphycus alvarezii: A systematic review. J. Appl. Phycol. 2024, 36, 3409–3450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Borzouie, S.; Rathgeber, B.M.; Stupart, C.M.; MacIsaac, J.; MacLaren, L.A. Effects of Dietary Inclusion of Seaweed, Heat Stress and Genetic Strain on Performance, Plasma Biochemical and Hematological Parameters in Laying Hens. Animals 2020, 10, 1570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Kulshreshtha, G.; Rathgeber, B.; Macisaac, J.; Boulianne, M.; Brigitte, L.; Stratton, G.; Thomas, N.A.; Critchley, A.T.; Hafting, J.; Prithiviraj, B. Feed Supplementation with Red Seaweeds, Chondrus crispus and Sarcodiotheca gaudichaudii, Reduce Salmonella Enteritidis in Laying Hens. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 00567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Sulistiawati, D.; Hafsah; Damayanti, A.P.; Rizal, A. Response of sea grapes (Caulerpa sp.) in diets on laying hens performance and egg quality. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2024, 1341, 012081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Li, Q.Q.; Luo, J.; Wang, C.M.; Tai, W.J.; Wang, H.H.; Zhang, X.; Liu, K.S.; Jia, Y.X.; Lyv, X.Z.; Wang, L.; et al. Ulvan extracted from green seaweeds as new natural additives in diets for laying hens. J. Appl. Phycol. 2018, 30, 2017–2027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Dewi, Y.L.; Yuniza, A.; Sayuti, K.; Nuraini; Mahata, M.E. Effects of Different Dietary Concentration of Fermented Brown Algae Sargassum Binderi on Plasma Lipid Profiles, Yolk Lipid, and Cholesterol Total of Laying Hens. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 2023, 33, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Selim, S.; Hussein, E.; Abou-Elkhair, R. Effect of Spirulina platensis as a feed additive on laying performance, egg quality and hepatoprotective activity of laying hens. Eur. Poult. Sci. 2018, 82, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. García Jacome, X.N.; González Ramírez, P.; Piñón Gimate, A.; Casas Valdéz, M. Sargassum en las dietas de gallinas Rhode Island mejora la calidad del huevo y funcionalidad por enriquecimiento con iodo. CICIMAR Oceánides 2023, 37, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Abo El-Maaty, H.A.; El-Khateeb, A.Y.; Al-Khalaifah, H.; El.Hamed, E.-S.A.; Hamed, S.; El-Said, E.A.; Mahrose, K.M.; Metwally, K.; Mansour, A.M. Effects of ecofriendly synthesized calcium nanoparticles with biocompatible Sargassum latifolium algae extract supplementation on egg quality and scanning electron microscopy images of the eggshell of aged laying hens. Poult. Sci. 2021, 100, 675–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Kulshreshtha, G.; Rathgeber, B.; Stratton, G.; Thomas, N.; Evans, F.; Critchley, A.; Hafting, J.; Prithiviraj, B. Feed supplementation with red seaweeds, Chondrus crispus and Sarcodiotheca gaudichaudii, affects performance, egg quality, and gut microbiota of layer hens. Poult. Sci. 2014, 93, 2991–3001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Mlambo, V.; Mnisi, C.M.; Matshogo, T.B.; Mhlongo, G. Prospects of dietary seaweeds and their bioactive compounds in sustainable poultry production systems: A symphony of good things? Front. Anim. Sci. 2022, 3, 998042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The nutritional regulation and therapeutic function of different seaweed active substances.
Figure 1. The nutritional regulation and therapeutic function of different seaweed active substances.
Marinedrugs 23 00324 g001
Figure 2. The main polysaccharide structures of seaweeds.
Figure 2. The main polysaccharide structures of seaweeds.
Marinedrugs 23 00324 g002
Figure 3. Beneficial effects of seaweed polysaccharides on intestinal barrier function in broilers.
Figure 3. Beneficial effects of seaweed polysaccharides on intestinal barrier function in broilers.
Marinedrugs 23 00324 g003
Table 1. The chemical composition components among three types of seaweed.
Table 1. The chemical composition components among three types of seaweed.
ItemsLipid Content (%DW)Carbohydrate Content (%DW)Protein Content (%DW)Dietary Fiber (%DW)References
Brown algae0.1–11.512.8–813.1–42.12.9–75[27]
Green algae0.2–154–79.90.4–32.11.1–64.9
Red algae0.4–128.3–68.23.5–473.3–65.6
Table 2. The main polysaccharides and their biological activities in seaweeds.
Table 2. The main polysaccharides and their biological activities in seaweeds.
Seaweed SpeciesMain PolysaccharidesSource of PolysaccharidesComposition StructureBiological ActivityReferences
Red algaeCarrageenanKappaphycus alvarezii (Rhodophyta, Solieriaceae), etc.A linear sulfated polysaccharide composed of D-galactopyranose linked by β-(1,3)- and α-(1,4)-glycosidic bonds.Antiviral, anti-inflammatory, anticoagulant, lipid metabolism regulation, and hypoglycemic effects, etc.[38]
AgarGracilariaceae, Gelidiaceae, Pterocladiaceae, etc.A long-chain neutral polysaccharide formed by the alternating repetition of β-D-Gal linked by 1,3-glycosidic bonds and 3,6-anhydro-α-Gal linked by 1,4-glycosidic bonds.[39]
Brown algaeFucoidanFucus vesiculosus (Ochrophyta, Fucaceae), etc.A linear core (formed by (1→6)-β-d-Gal and/or (1→2)-β-d-Man units) with branched chains of “fucan” (formed by (1→3) and/or (1→4)-α-l-Fuc, (1→4)-α-d-GlcA, teminal β-d-Xyl and, sometimes, (1→4)-α-d-Glu).Antithrombotic, antioxidant, hypolipidemic, and immunomodulatory effects, etc.[33,40]
AlginateMacrocystis pyrifera (Ochrophyta, Laminariaceae), Laminaria hyperborea (Ochrophyta, Laminariaceae), Ascophyllum nodosum (Ochrophyta, Fucaceae), etc.A linear polysaccharide composed of three forms: β-D-mannuronic acid (M residues), α-L-guluronic acid (G residues), or alternating M and G residues.[28,41,42]
Green algaeUlvan PolysaccharideEnteromorpha prolifera (Chlorophyta, Ulvaceae), etc.A water-soluble sulfated polysaccharide mainly composed of glucuronic acid, xylose, rhamnose, and galactose.Immunomodulation, anti-inflammation, anti-tumor effects, etc.[43,44]
Table 3. The application of seaweeds and their active substances in broiler production.
Table 3. The application of seaweeds and their active substances in broiler production.
Seaweed SpeciesSeaweedThe Optimal Addition Amount of Seaweed
(in the Basal Diet)
Mechanism of ActionApplication EffectivenessReferences
Red algaeLithothamnium calcareum (Rhodophyta, Corallinaceae)1018 μg/kg AFB1 + 0.2% L. calcareumBinding of surface functional groups (such as carboxyl and hydroxyl) of L. calcareum to AFB1 for AFB1 adsorption.Alleviation of AFB1-induced hepatic injury in broilers.[83]
Kappaphycus alvarezii (Rhodophyta, Solieriaceae)1.0 g/kg seaweed extract PBD1Intestinal gene expression controlling gut permeability and mucosal immunity.Growth performance and immune response in broilers ↑.[84]
Halymenia palmata (Rhodophyta, Halymeniaceae)0.25%Linear growth trend of body weight gain and feed conversion rate.[85]
Eucheuma denticulatum (Rhodophyta, Solieriaceae)1.0 g/kg seaweed extract PBD5Enhancement of intestinal immunity and growth hormone-receptor gene expression.Feed efficiency ↑, intestinal pathogen load↓, body growth ↑.[77]
Chondrus crispus (Rhodophyta, Gigartinaceae)0.30%Carcass and breast meat yield ↑, abdominal fat yield ↓[86]
0.40%Relative weights of bursa and thymus ↑, and maintenance of intestinal pH stability.
Chondracanthus chamissoi (Rhodophyta, Gigartinaceae)1.5%Improvement in villus height (VH) and the ratio of villus height to crypt depth (VH:CD), and increase in the abundance of beneficial bacterial genera.Intestinal morphology ↑, and growth performance ↑.[87]
Brown algaeUndaria pinnatifida (Ochrophyta, Alariaceae)0.5%Weight ↑, mortality ↓.[88]
Hizikia fusiformis (Ochrophyta, Sargassaceae)0.5%
Ascophyllum nodosum (Ochrophyta, Fucaceae)2%Reduction in plasma alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) activities in broiler chickens.Heat stress alleviation, and growth performance ↑.[89]
Green algaeEnteromorpha prolifera (Chlorophyta, Ulvaceae)0.1 mg/kg AFB1 + 0.25% Enteromorpha prolifera polysaccharidesInhibition of phase I detoxification enzymes and up-regulation of the p38MAPK/NRF2–mediated phase II detoxification enzyme pathway.Alleviation of AFB1-induced hepatic injury in broilers.[90]
100 mg/kg AFB1 + 2500 mg/kg Enteromorpha prolifera polysaccharidesRegulation of NRF2-mediated redox and mitochondrial apoptosis signaling pa.thways in broilersAlleviation of AFB1-induced bursal injury in broilers.[91]
7000 mg/kgUp-regulation of Lipin1 and SESN1 gene expression, down-regulation of FGFR2 gene expression, promotion of protein synthesis and reduction in fat deposition.Pectoral muscle yield ↑.[92]
Ulva lactuca (Chlorophyta, Ulvaceae)Replacement of corn in the basal diet with 3.0% U. lactucaSlaughter rate and pectoral muscle rate in broilers ↑.[20]
↑: Improving; ↓: Decreasing.
Table 4. The application of seaweeds and their active substances in layer-hen production.
Table 4. The application of seaweeds and their active substances in layer-hen production.
Seaweed SpeciesSeaweedThe Optimal Amount of Seaweed to Add (in the Basal Diet)Mechanism of ActionApplication EffectivenessReferences
Red algaeKappaphycus alvarezii (Rhodophyta, Solieriaceae)1.5%Reduction of lipid oxidation and cholesterol content of egg yolks.Improvement in age at sexual maturity, egg production, egg quality and immune response.[9,106]
Chondrus crispus (Rhodophyta, Gigartinaceae)3%Stimulation of the growth of beneficial intestinal bacteria and inhibition of Salmonella colonization.Weight ↑, feed conversion ratio (FCR) for egg production ↓, egg production rate ↑.[107]
Chondrus crispus (Rhodophyta, Gigartinaceae)4%Increased concentration of SCFAs in cecum contents and decreased Salmonella colonization.Immune response ↑, improvement in intestinal microbial community structure, and growth performance and egg quality ↑.[108]
Sarcodiotheca gaudichaudii (Rhodophyta, Solieriaceae)4%
Green algaeCaulerpa lentillifera (Chlorophyta, Caulerpaceae)1.5%Increased protein intake, multiple antioxidant ingredients to scavenge free radicals in the body and reduce oxidative stress.Maintenance of liver health, egg production rate ↑, and antioxidant activity in egg yolk ↑.[109]
Ulva sp. (Chlorophyta, Ulvaceae)0.5~1.0% UlvanUp-regulation of intestinal FXR and hepatic CYP7A1 gene expression, reduction of cholesterol levels, and improvement in intestinal function.Immune function ↑, antioxidant capacity ↑, improvement in laying performance and egg quality.[110]
Brown algaeSargassum binderi (Ochrophyta, Sargassaceae)16%Reduction of cholesterol content and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) in hen plasma and egg yolk.Improvement in lipid metabolism in hens and egg quality ↑.[111]
Cyanoba-cteriaSpirulina platensis (Cyanobacteria, Oscillatoriaceae)3 kg/tReduction of cholesterol levels in serum and egg yolk.Egg-laying performance ↑, egg quality ↑ and FCR ↑.[112]
↑: Improving; ↓: Decreasing.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, S.-B.; Yao, Q.-H.; Ye, X.-Q.; Balasubramanian, B.; Liu, W.-C. Unraveling of Seaweed Bioactive Substances and Their Nutritional Regulation Functions for Poultry. Mar. Drugs 2025, 23, 324. https://doi.org/10.3390/md23080324

AMA Style

Li S-B, Yao Q-H, Ye X-Q, Balasubramanian B, Liu W-C. Unraveling of Seaweed Bioactive Substances and Their Nutritional Regulation Functions for Poultry. Marine Drugs. 2025; 23(8):324. https://doi.org/10.3390/md23080324

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Si-Bing, Qing-Hua Yao, Xue-Qing Ye, Balamuralikrishnan Balasubramanian, and Wen-Chao Liu. 2025. "Unraveling of Seaweed Bioactive Substances and Their Nutritional Regulation Functions for Poultry" Marine Drugs 23, no. 8: 324. https://doi.org/10.3390/md23080324

APA Style

Li, S.-B., Yao, Q.-H., Ye, X.-Q., Balasubramanian, B., & Liu, W.-C. (2025). Unraveling of Seaweed Bioactive Substances and Their Nutritional Regulation Functions for Poultry. Marine Drugs, 23(8), 324. https://doi.org/10.3390/md23080324

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop