Next Article in Journal
Therapeutic Potential of Hibiscus sabdariffa Linn. in Attenuating Cardiovascular Risk Factors
Next Article in Special Issue
In Silico Development of Novel Benzofuran-1,3,4-Oxadiazoles as Lead Inhibitors of M. tuberculosis Polyketide Synthase 13
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Advances in Doxorubicin Formulation to Enhance Pharmacokinetics and Tumor Targeting
Previous Article in Special Issue
Diosgenin and Monohydroxy Spirostanol from Prunus amygdalus var amara Seeds as Potential Suppressors of EGFR and HER2 Tyrosine Kinases: A Computational Approach
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Synthesis, Physicochemical Characterization, Biological Evaluation, In Silico and Molecular Docking Studies of Pd(II) Complexes with P, S-Donor Ligands

Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16(6), 806; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16060806
by Hizbullah Khan 1,*, Muhammad Sirajuddin 1,*, Amin Badshah 2, Sajjad Ahmad 3, Muhammad Bilal 4, Syed Muhammad Salman 5, Ian S. Butler 6, Tanveer A. Wani 7 and Seema Zargar 8
Reviewer 1:
Pharmaceuticals 2023, 16(6), 806; https://doi.org/10.3390/ph16060806
Submission received: 12 May 2023 / Revised: 25 May 2023 / Accepted: 26 May 2023 / Published: 29 May 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Structural and Computational-Driven Molecule Design in Drug Discovery)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

-In the Abstract part avoid the abbreviations like “E. coli, K. pneumonia and S. aureus”.

-In the Abstract part add in the method subsection, the name of the used anticlerical assay.

-Add briefly to the abstract part antibacterial results.

-Add statistical analysis subsection to the material and method section.

-Add statistical analysis to all obtained results of your study.

At the end of abstract part conclusions and future recommendations.

Nothing in the keyword mentioned about antibacterial activity.

- The whole manuscript needs language and editing corrections 

- I recommend authors to compare their antibacterial results with antibiotics as positive control.

-throughout the whole manuscript and other Latin words must be in Italic manner.

 

 

 

 

 

The whole manuscript needs language and editing corrections by a native speaker

 

Author Response

Dear Reviewer

Thanks a lot for your valuable suggestions and corrections. we have tried our best to consider each and every point you have mentioned.

-In the Abstract part avoid the abbreviations like “E. coli, K. pneumonia and S. aureus”.

Author Response: Full names are now used instead of abbreviations: Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumonia and Staphylococcus aureus

-In the Abstract part add in the method subsection, the name of the used anticlerical assay.

Author Response: Agar well diffusion method was used for antibacterial and using the sulforhodamine B (SRB) method was used for anticancer and are now added in the abstract as suggested.

-Add briefly to the abstract part antibacterial results.

Author Response: Done as suggested.

-Add statistical analysis subsection to the material and method section.

Author Response: Graph Pad Prism was applied for statistical analysis which is now mentioned in the material and method section.

-Add statistical analysis to all obtained results of your study.

Author Response: Added now as suggested.

At the end of abstract part conclusions and future recommendations.

Author Response: Recommendation added.

Nothing in the keyword mentioned about antibacterial activity.

Author Response: It is now added in the keywords.

- The whole manuscript needs language and editing corrections 

Author Response:  The whole manuscript is now thoroughly checked by an English Expert to omit the mistakes.

- I recommend authors to compare their antibacterial results with antibiotics as positive control.

Author Response: It can be seen in antibacterial Table 4, where Streptomycin is mentioned as positive reference drug.

-throughout the whole manuscript and other Latin words must be in Italic manner

Author Response: Done as suggested.

Reviewer 2 Report

 

This is a well-designed and performed study. They used several experimental approaches: chemical synthesis, physicochemical characterization, antibacterial activity assays, antitumor activity and in silico and molecular docking studies. The results obtained are very relevant.

 

Major point:

 

A conclusion must be added at the end both of the manuscript and abstract and the abstract.

 

 

Minor:

 

Line 296: “…of 2>3>4>1.” Should be “…of 2>3>1>4.”

 

 

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Dear Reviewer, We are highly thankful for your valuable time and mentioned some critical points and suggestions. All the corrections made are yellow highlighted in the paper.

Comments. I suggest that authors provide a hypothesis. The justification for the use of dithiocarbamates for its incorporation to complexes with palladium is weak since use of references is missing.

Author Response: A paragraph including references (23-26) is added in the introduction part.

Please: Uniformize the use of words “cis-platin” or “cisplatin”.

Author Response: Ok suggestion incorporated. cisplatin is used.

Line 71. It is necessary to indicate the reference number of Khan et al.

Author Response: Ref. # 17-19 are now mentioned.

Line 113. Correct “dithiocarbamte” word.

Author Response: Corrected.

Line 304. Correct “positve” word.

Author Response: Corrected.

Line 182. Eliminate the abbreviation in the following phrase “The tested compounds having conc. 2 mg/mL”

Author Response: Done 

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors conducted all the required corrections and I have not any more corrections

Back to TopTop