Next Article in Journal
Development of a Portable All-Wavelength PPG Sensing Device for Robust Adaptive-Depth Measurement: A Spectrometer Approach with a Hydrostatic Measurement Example
Next Article in Special Issue
Nanozymes for Environmental Pollutant Monitoring and Remediation
Previous Article in Journal
Probabilistic Evaluation of 3D Surfaces Using Statistical Shape Models (SSM)
Previous Article in Special Issue
Advanced RuO2 Thin Films for pH Sensing Application
Article

Maturity Prediction in Yellow Peach (Prunus persica L.) Cultivars Using a Fluorescence Spectrometer

1
Agriculture Victoria, Tatura, VIC 3616, Australia
2
Food Agility CRC Ltd., Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia
3
Rubens Technologies Pty Ltd., Rowville, VIC 3178, Australia
4
Instruments & Data Tools Pty Ltd., Rowville, VIC 3178, Australia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sensors 2020, 20(22), 6555; https://doi.org/10.3390/s20226555
Received: 14 October 2020 / Revised: 8 November 2020 / Accepted: 15 November 2020 / Published: 17 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biennial State-of-the-Art Sensors Technology in Australia 2019-2020)
Technology for rapid, non-invasive and accurate determination of fruit maturity is increasingly sought after in horticultural industries. This study investigated the ability to predict fruit maturity of yellow peach cultivars using a prototype non-destructive fluorescence spectrometer. Collected spectra were analysed to predict flesh firmness (FF), soluble solids concentration (SSC), index of absorbance difference (IAD), skin and flesh colour attributes (i.e., a* and H°) and maturity classes (immature, harvest-ready and mature) in four yellow peach cultivars—‘August Flame’, ‘O’Henry’, ‘Redhaven’ and ‘September Sun’. The cultivars provided a diverse range of maturity indices. The fluorescence spectrometer consistently predicted IAD and skin colour in all the cultivars under study with high accuracy (Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient > 0.85), whereas flesh colour’s estimation was always accurate apart from ‘Redhaven’. Except for ‘September Sun’, good prediction of FF and SSC was observed. Fruit maturity classes were reliably predicted with a high likelihood (F1-score = 0.85) when samples from the four cultivars were pooled together. Further studies are needed to assess the performance of the fluorescence spectrometer on other fruit crops. Work is underway to develop a handheld version of the fluorescence spectrometer to improve the utility and adoption by fruit growers, packhouses and supply chain managers. View Full-Text
Keywords: flesh colour; flesh firmness; index of absorbance difference (IAD); machine learning; non-destructive measurements; pigments; sensor; ripeness; skin colour; soluble solids flesh colour; flesh firmness; index of absorbance difference (IAD); machine learning; non-destructive measurements; pigments; sensor; ripeness; skin colour; soluble solids
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Scalisi, A.; Pelliccia, D.; O’Connell, M.G. Maturity Prediction in Yellow Peach (Prunus persica L.) Cultivars Using a Fluorescence Spectrometer. Sensors 2020, 20, 6555. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20226555

AMA Style

Scalisi A, Pelliccia D, O’Connell MG. Maturity Prediction in Yellow Peach (Prunus persica L.) Cultivars Using a Fluorescence Spectrometer. Sensors. 2020; 20(22):6555. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20226555

Chicago/Turabian Style

Scalisi, Alessio, Daniele Pelliccia, and Mark G. O’Connell. 2020. "Maturity Prediction in Yellow Peach (Prunus persica L.) Cultivars Using a Fluorescence Spectrometer" Sensors 20, no. 22: 6555. https://doi.org/10.3390/s20226555

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop