Fluorescence is present in various forms across Arthropoda [
1,
2], with occurrence in some groups (particularly scorpions) widely known. Occurrence of fluorescence in crustacea is less well studied than other groups (however, see [
3,
4,
5,
6]), potentially due to the more easily detected bioluminescence across many terrestrial taxa in more accessible habitats [
7]. Inducement of fluorescence depends on ambient light levels (particularly blue and UV, tied to depth in the sea [
5]), while detection depends on the visual capacity of both the fluorescing species (for conspecific interaction) and potential predators or prey [
8].
Knowledge of fluorescence and its drivers in crustaceans is limited, but studies on stomatopods (which are known to be sensitive to UV light) have indicated fluorescence as a potential enhancer for visual signalling in the more light-limited underwater environment [
5], with the potential for patterns to aid in identification of conspecifics, though it is noted visual systems in this group are particularly sensitive. Fluorescence in Portunid crabs has been found to typically increase with growth stage (juveniles typically displaying lower levels or incomplete patterns compared to those found in adults) [
6]. Simulated stress was shown to decrease fluorescence in some areas of Lithoid king crabs over short time scales [
4]. The use of fluorescence to aid in crustacean identification has been noted [
6], and increasing knowledge of decapod fluorescence has been garnered by underwater photography awards, such as the Underwater Photographer of the Year award for a photo of a fluorescing squat lobster
Galathea strigosa (Linnaeus, 1761) [
9], as well as other examples for other species and groups exhibiting fluorescence not covered here [
10].
Here, we document the occurrence of this property among common species found in the Northeast Atlantic. Observations were made sporadically during rockpooling trips from 2025 to 2026, but all photos (excluding those for edible crabs and European lobsters ) were taken on 3/3/26 with individuals found in the intertidal of East Sands, St Andrews, Scotland. Photos for edible crabs and European lobsters were taken when the species were present in the Scottish Oceans Institute for study on 11/9/25. A commercially available UV torch (Lepro, Las Vegas, NV, USA) was used to induce fluorescence (at 395 nm), and photographs were taken using an OM TG-7 camera (OM Digital Solutions, Tokyo, Japan). Photos were taken in standard or macro mode, with automatic focus used at varying distances. A Zeikos 40.5 mm UV filter (Zeikos, NJ, USA) was used to block reflected UV light.
Fluorescence was generally localised in the setae and dactyli tips of pereiopods, the most visible found in the great spider crab
Hyas araneus (Linnaeus, 1758; Brachyura: Oregoniidae;
Figure 1) and the common hermit crab
Pagurus bernhardus (Linnaeus, 1758; Anomura: Paguridae;
Figure 2). All encountered
H. araneus and
P. bernhardus displayed fluorescence in the same areas and to the same degree.
Figure 1.
Dorsal (A,B) and ventral (C,D) views under normal (A,C) and UV (B,D) light of the great spider crab Hyas araneus. Setae fluorescence occurs across the body and limbs, with dactyli tips also fluorescing. Red fluorescing tufts are attached algae (largely Plocamium spp). The carapace width of the individual photographed was ~5 cm.
Figure 1.
Dorsal (A,B) and ventral (C,D) views under normal (A,C) and UV (B,D) light of the great spider crab Hyas araneus. Setae fluorescence occurs across the body and limbs, with dactyli tips also fluorescing. Red fluorescing tufts are attached algae (largely Plocamium spp). The carapace width of the individual photographed was ~5 cm.
Figure 2.
Common hermit crab Pagurus bernhardus under normal (A) and UV light (B) with fluorescence on setae across the body and dactyli tips. The Littorina littorea shell occupied was ~3 cm at the coiling axis.
Figure 2.
Common hermit crab Pagurus bernhardus under normal (A) and UV light (B) with fluorescence on setae across the body and dactyli tips. The Littorina littorea shell occupied was ~3 cm at the coiling axis.
The brown crab
Cancer pagurus (Linnaeus, 1758; Brachyura: Cancridae) exhibited no visible fluorescence as a juvenile but did so as an adult, with this generally limited to setae on the mouthparts, the underside of the body, and pereiopods except the chelae, in addition to the dactyli tips (
Figure 3). Mature females had more and longer setae, resulting in greater levels of fluorescence than males of similar sizes. Juveniles only exhibited fluorescence at dactyli tips. Adult European lobsters
Homarus gammarus (Linnaeus, 1758; Astacidea: Nephropidae) also fluoresced, largely from setae on the mouthparts, swimmerets, distal pereiopod segments (except for the chelae), pleon, and telson fringes (
Figure 4). Higher setae density was also present on females of this species, but this divergence was to a lesser degree than
C. pagurus and unclear in photos (TIB pers. obvs.). Preserved early benthic-phase lobsters (with a carapace length of < 2 cm) were also investigated for fluorescence and did not display it, though it has been noted that preservation can lessen levels [
6].
The green crab
Carcinus maenas (Linnaeus, 1758; Brachyura: Carcinidae) generally only fluoresced at the dactyli tips (
Figure 5). Large individuals sometimes fluoresced on the carapace, possibly due to longer time in moult, driving degradation of the cuticle and exposure of fluorescent layers, especially at the edges and white points on the carapace (
Figure 5A,B) or facilitating greater growth of encrusting species which may themselves fluoresce (
Figure 5C,D).
No fluorescence was noted in the long claw porcelain crab
Pisidia longicornis (Linnaeus, 1767; Anomura: Porcellanidae), broad claw porcelain crab
Porcellana platycheles (Pennant, 1777; Anomura: Porcellanidae), isopods
Idotea spp. (Isopoda: Idoteidae), and some amphipods (likely
Gammarus spp.,
Figure 6).
Figure 3.
Views of edible crab Cancer pagurus under normal (A,I) and UV light (B–H,I,K). Panels (A–D) display a female crab (carapace width, CW, ~12 cm) with focus on overall ventral surface (B), mouthparts (C), and pereiopod tips (D). (E–H) display a male (~13 cm CW) with reduced setal cover and fluorescence compared to the female in the ventral surface (F), mouthparts (G), and pereiopods (H). (I–K) displays juveniles (I,J ~6 cm CW, K ~2 cm CW), the colour in ambient light (I) and lack of fluorescence under UV on the dorsal (J,K) and ventral side, excluding dactyli tips (K).
Figure 3.
Views of edible crab Cancer pagurus under normal (A,I) and UV light (B–H,I,K). Panels (A–D) display a female crab (carapace width, CW, ~12 cm) with focus on overall ventral surface (B), mouthparts (C), and pereiopod tips (D). (E–H) display a male (~13 cm CW) with reduced setal cover and fluorescence compared to the female in the ventral surface (F), mouthparts (G), and pereiopods (H). (I–K) displays juveniles (I,J ~6 cm CW, K ~2 cm CW), the colour in ambient light (I) and lack of fluorescence under UV on the dorsal (J,K) and ventral side, excluding dactyli tips (K).
Figure 4.
European lobster Homarus gammarus viewed in normal (A) and UV (B–G) light. Fluorescence was typically limited to setae at the rostrum (B) on the dorsal side but not the rest of the carapace (C). Ventral setal fluorescence was present across the mouthparts (D), pereiopods (E; excluding chelae), telson (F), and pleopods (G). The lobster pictures here had a carapace length of ~9 cm.
Figure 4.
European lobster Homarus gammarus viewed in normal (A) and UV (B–G) light. Fluorescence was typically limited to setae at the rostrum (B) on the dorsal side but not the rest of the carapace (C). Ventral setal fluorescence was present across the mouthparts (D), pereiopods (E; excluding chelae), telson (F), and pleopods (G). The lobster pictures here had a carapace length of ~9 cm.
Figure 5.
Views of three green crabs Carcinus maenas (A,B ~9 cm CW, C,D ~6 cm CW, E–G ~5 cm CW) under ambient (A,C,E) and UV light (B,D,F,G). Fluorescence was seen most clearly on the largest (and oldest) crab, matching carapace patterning (B), though it was also seen on dactyli tips (G). White growth on the carapace also fluoresced (C,D).
Figure 5.
Views of three green crabs Carcinus maenas (A,B ~9 cm CW, C,D ~6 cm CW, E–G ~5 cm CW) under ambient (A,C,E) and UV light (B,D,F,G). Fluorescence was seen most clearly on the largest (and oldest) crab, matching carapace patterning (B), though it was also seen on dactyli tips (G). White growth on the carapace also fluoresced (C,D).
Figure 6.
Views of the long claw porcelain crab Pisidia longicornis (A,B, <1 cm CW) and broad claw porcelain crab Porcellana platycheles (C,D, ~1 cm CW) under normal (A,C) and UV (B,D) light, displaying no fluorescence. Idotea isopods and amphipods under UV (E) also displaying no fluorescence (individual sizes ~1 cm).
Figure 6.
Views of the long claw porcelain crab Pisidia longicornis (A,B, <1 cm CW) and broad claw porcelain crab Porcellana platycheles (C,D, ~1 cm CW) under normal (A,C) and UV (B,D) light, displaying no fluorescence. Idotea isopods and amphipods under UV (E) also displaying no fluorescence (individual sizes ~1 cm).
Some crustaceans can detect UV [
11], and fluorescence in such species can be used for visual signalling [
5]. Development of fluorescent structures at maturity and differentially between sexes could function to aid in mate detection, or may simply be a product of differential setae investment between sexes. Consistent localization at the dactyli tips may also be a consequence of cuticle structure at this point, but may aid in increasing the visibility of threat displays, as in stomatopods [
5]. Potential predators, such as fish [
12], birds [
13], and other crustaceans, can also detect UV, and this may constrain fluorescence in small species or juvenile stages which do not have the size-based escape (large decapods) or defences (hermit crab shell, spider crab camouflage) of the other fluorescing species; fluorescence is often lower in juveniles than adults of crustaceans [
6] and other arthropods [
2]. Species investigated here were predominantly intertidal, where light is present across the spectrum; colour and fluorescence may be more important in these species than crustaceans that inhabit deeper water or pelagic environments, which have more blue-biassed vision due to the reduced spectrum experienced [
14].
The lack of observation of fluorescence in some species at any particular stage does not rule it out: the relevant moult stage, age, or sex may not have been observed, or the signal strength of fluorescence in some areas may not have been detected by the observers. If fluorescence development is seasonal, it also may have been missed. UV examination in other wavelengths may also yield results not found here. This is also the reverse in the case of fluorescing species: stages or sexes not examined may not fluoresce in the same manner as adults, and no pelagic (larval) stages were assessed of any species.
Overall, we highlight the variability of fluorescence within and between species to bring attention to its potential impact in ecology. Fluorescence is helpful in locating camouflaged species such as
H. araneus (TIB pers. obvs.) and has the capacity to aid identification of similar species [
6]. More widespread knowledge of this phenomenon could aid in guiding future experimentation and surveys of species with fluorescent properties.