Next Article in Journal
Intra-Annual Course of Canopy Parameters and Phenological Patterns for a Mixed and Diverse Deciduous Forest Ecosystem Along the Altitudinal Gradients Within a Dam Reservoir Landscape
Previous Article in Journal
Genetic Variation and Differentiation of Himantoglossum s.s. in Greece
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Heterobranch Sea Slugs s.l. (Mollusca, Gastropoda) from the Southern Ocean: Biodiversity and Taxonomy

1
Department of Evolutionary Biology, Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Faculty of Biology, University of Barcelona, Avda. Diagonal, 643, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
2
IRBio, Biodiversity Research Institute, University of Barcelona, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
3
Department of Statistics, Faculty of Biology, University of Barcelona, Avda. Diagonal, 643, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
4
National Marine Science Centre, Southern Cross University, Bay Drive, Coffs Harbour, NSW 2450, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Diversity 2025, 17(5), 330; https://doi.org/10.3390/d17050330
Submission received: 3 March 2025 / Revised: 25 April 2025 / Accepted: 27 April 2025 / Published: 3 May 2025

Abstract

:
The Southern Ocean, located between Antarctica and the southern tips of South America, Africa and Australia, encompasses an immense area across the southern Atlantic, Pacific and Indian oceans with no clearly defined limits. For the purposes of studying marine heterobranch sea slugs, we consider the Southern Ocean to include all ocean areas located south of latitude 41° S. South of this latitude, we consider different areas and zones: the area of South America (the Patagonia/Magellanic area), the island of Tasmania, the southern island of New Zealand, the Subantarctic area (the Falkland Islands, South Georgia Island, the South Orkney Islands, South Sandwich Island, Bouvet Island, the islands of Crozet and Prince Edward, the Kerguelen Islands, and Macquarie Island) and the area of Antarctica, in which we consider four zones (Weddell Sea, West Antarctica, Ross Sea and East Antarctica). Reviewing all available references and unpublished data from the authors, in total, 394 species of heterobranch sea slugs have been recorded to date in the Southern Ocean > 41° S, with Nudibranchia standing out with 209 species and Cephalaspidea with 90 species. The marine heterobranchs of Tasmania (154 species) and southern New Zealand (120 species) have been well studied. Sea slug fauna of the Antarctic and Subantarctic regions have been the subject of several partial studies; however, there are still many gaps in knowledge across both areas. Eighty-nine different species of sea slug have been recorded so far in strictly Antarctic waters (West Antarctica, 45 species; Weddell Sea, 48 species; Ross Sea, 51 species; East Antarctica, 42 species), while in the various Subantarctic regions, there are 93 species (36 species from South Georgia, 17 species from the South Orkneys, 12 species from south Sandwich, 6 species from Bouvet, 10 species from Prince Edward and Crozet Islands, 15 species from Kerguelen, 3 species from Macquarie Island, 29 species from the Falkland Islands and 71 species from the coast of South America). In the taxonomic section, for each of the species, the location and the authors of the records are indicated, and for many of the species, interesting biological, taxonomic or biogeographic observations are also provided. The importance of sampling in underexplored areas is discussed, as well as greater-depth sampling for a better understanding of the sea slugs of the Southern Ocean.

1. Introduction

The Southern Ocean is a vast marine area with no strictly defined boundaries, located south of Africa, South America and Australia. It supports some of the most productive and unique marine ecosystems on the globe (Tynan, 1998) [1]. It is not universally accepted as a separate ocean, but in many studies the southernmost Atlantic, Pacific and Indian oceans are delimited using this name. Lawver et al. (2014) [2] carried out an interesting study on the reconstruction of the Southern Ocean from the late Cretaceous to the present day, based on magnetic anomalies and geological evidence from the seabed, and the physical and biological characteristics of the Southern Ocean are summarized in the work of Knox (2006) [3]. Briggs and Bowden (2012) [4] proposed a set of marine biogeographic regions and provinces, which was later accepted and expanded by Toonen et al. (2016) [5]. For the study of the biogeographic affinities of Heterobranchia sea slugs, we generally take into account in this work the biogeographic classification of Toonen et al. (2016) [5] and consider the limit of the Southern Ocean south of the Southern Subtropical Front (SSF), which tends to delimit the warmer and more saline marine waters located to the north from the colder and less saline waters located to the south.
Except for the Antarctic continent and the continental shelf of the southern tip of South America, most of the Southern Ocean is made up of bathyal and abyssal beds that have undergone little exploration. Consequently, there is a paucity of knowledge regarding the biodiversity of these vast areas. Brandt et al. (2007) [6] summarized much of the research activities carried out across deep-water ocean areas, including the biodiversity of the deep Southern Ocean. The results indicated that, depending on the taxonomic group, up to 90% of species observed in abyssal sediments were new to science. However, multiple oceanographic explorations have made it possible to partially understand the biodiversity that the Southern Ocean supports. Recent sections contained in De Broyer et al. (eds.) (2014) [7] distil much of the contemporary knowledge of the Southern Ocean’s biodiversity, while Griffiths et al. (2008) make an approach to the general biogeography of benthos [8]. Among the main taxonomic groups recorded, there are, for example, macroalgae (124 Antarctic species; Wiencke et al., 2014) [9], poriferans (400 species; Janussen & Downy, 2014) [10], benthic hydroids (179 Antarctic species; Peña, 2014) [11], hexacorals (187 species; Rodríguez & Fautin, 2014) [12], polychaetes (588 Antarctic species; Schüller & Ebbe, 2014) [13], bryozoans (412 species south of the Polar Front; Barnes & Downey, 2014) [14], free-living nematodes (524 Antarctic species; Ingels et al., 2014) [15], pycnogonids (332 species; Soler-Membrives et al., 2014) [16], isopods (740 species; Kaiser, 2014) [17], decapod crustaceans (45 species; Griffiths et al., 2014; Basher & Costello, 2014) [18,19] and echinoderms (345 species, except holothurians and brittle-stars; Danis et al., 2014; Eleaume et al., 2014; Saucede et al., 2014) [20,21,22]. In another work, De Broyer and Jazdzewska (2014) [23] reported 853 species of amphipod crustaceans across the Southern Ocean (417 species recorded north of the Polar Front and 564 species to the south). Many of these taxa were sampled from deep water during the ANDEEP (ANtarctic Benthic DEEP-sea Biodiversity) expedition.
Although modern global climate change affects most of the planet, the Antarctic region is subject to some of the most extreme changes, particularly the effects of warming and losses of ice sheet cover (Turner et al., 2009) [24]. Antarctic marine species are highly sensitive to environmental change. As stenothermal life forms have adapted to temperatures around −1.8 to 2.0 °C, they may not survive elevated temperatures (Peck et al., 2004) [25]. This generates a serious threat to the biodiversity of this region, and thus it needs to be further documented before it is lost, especially in vulnerable taxa such as sea slugs.
The study of Southern Ocean mollusks has been the focus of many studies since the 19th century, including several works that assessed geographic biodiversity. For example, treatises have been generated by Carcelles (1953) [26], Dell (1990) [27] and Engl (2012) [28] on Antarctic mollusks; Martens and Pfeffer (1886) [29] on those from South Georgia; Thiele (1912) [30] on taxa collected from the German South Polar Expedition; Melville and Standen (1912) [31] on those from the Scottish National Antarctic Expedition; Powell (1951 and 1960) [32,33] on Antarctic and Subantarctic mollusks; Powell (1957) [34] on the Kerguelen and Macquarie Islands; Powell (1958) [35] on Victoria-Ross in Antarctica; Rochebrune and Mabille (1889) [36] on those from Cape Horn, Chile; Strebel (1905) [37] and Forcelli (2000) [38] on the Magellan province of Chile; Aldea and Troncoso (2010) [39] on mollusks from the Bellingshausen Sea; Spencer et al. (2009, 2016) [40,41] on the mollusks of New Zealand; and Grove (2015) [42] on those from Tasmania, Australia. Linse et al. (2006) [43] studied the diversity and biogeography of shelled marine gastropods and bivalves at depths between 0 and 100 m and divided the Southern Ocean into 27 bioregions across the Antarctic, the Subantarctic, the southern tip of South America and the South Island of New Zealand. They reported a total of 895 species of shelled gastropods and 379 bivalve taxa. Jörger et al. (2014) [44] analyzed the diversity and abundance of abyssal mollusks found between 2732 and 4327 m in the Antarctic Polar Front (previously known as the Antarctic Convergence area). In that study, 58 separate taxa, of which 33 were identified as species, were reported. Moreau et al. (2013) [45] reported on the Mollusca of the Amundsen Sea with 97 morphospecies; Schiaparelli et al. (2006, 2014) [46] reported on 142 mollusk species from the Ross Sea and Zelaya (2005) [47], with 121 gastropod species from South Georgia. The recent development of the Southern Ocean Mollusc Database (SOMBASE) provides a useful taxonomic resource (Griffiths et al., 2003) [48]. This database provides information on the nomenclature, synonyms, morphology and ecology of species, including distributions. An extensive bibliography is also provided. At its launch, SOMBASE included information on 950 species of shelled gastropods and 136 species of bivalves.
Sea slugs (Gastropoda: Heterobranchia) are spectacular mollusks in their shapes, colors, lifestyles, and defense and reproduction methods that have attracted numerous researchers and divers from around the world (Wägele & Klussmann-Kolb, 2005) [49]. For the sea slugs, the first Southern Ocean records are found sporadically across the various reports produced from expeditions undertaken in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, including but not limited to Bergh (1884) [50] on the “Challenger”; Pelseneer (1887) [51], with the Gymnosomata from “Challenger”; Eliot in 1905 and 1909, from the “Scottish National Antarctic Expedition; Vayssière (1906b) [52], with reports of the nudibranchs from “Charcot’s Antarctic Expedition”; Odhner (1926) [53], from the “Swedish Antarctic Expedition”, and in 1934 from the “British Antarctic Terra Nova Expedition”; and Marcus (1959) [54] with the “Lundy University Chile Expedition”. More contemporary studies include Burn (1973) [55], with taxa from Macquarie and Heard Islands; Vicente and Arnaud (1974) [56], with sea slugs from Terra Adelia, Antarctica; Cattaneo-Vietti (1991) [57], with nudibranchs from the Ross Sea; Castellanos et al. (1993) [58], with sea slugs from the Argentine Magellanic region; Dadon and Chauvin (1998) [59], with the Gymnosomata from the Southwest Atlantic; Cárdenas et al. (2008) [60], reporting from northern Chilean Patagonia; Hunt et al. (2008) [61], with Pteropods of the Southern Ocean; Minichev (1972) [62], with sea slugs from the Davis Sea; Schrödl (2003) [63] on sea slugs of southern South America; and lastly Troncoso et al. (1997) [64], with sea slugs of the Scotia Sea. Pelagic sea slugs have also been subjects of studies by Dadon and Chauvin (1998) [59], Gilmer and Lalli (1990) [65], and Hunt et al. (2008) [61]. Additionally, there are several other studies that focus on the biology, taxonomy or distribution of particular species. In the present work, these studies are referenced in the taxonomic part.
The heterobranch sea slugs are a large and diverse group of specialized gastropods that are globally ubiquitous to most benthic marine environments (Wägele & Klussmann-Kolb, 2005) [49]. Some taxa are even limited to the pelagic realm. They are important members of many benthic communities due to their high species diversity (more than 6000 known species), abundance and direct influence on community structure as selective predators of sessile filtering organisms (Clark, 1975; Todd, 1981) [66,67]. Morphologically, they are highly diverse. They are principally soft-bodied with a highly reduced shell, and in most taxa the shell is completely absent (at least in the adult stage). In order to compensate for shell loss, they have evolved alternative defense mechanisms which can include camouflage (homochromy and crypsis) and the secretion of acid materials or toxic/distasteful metabolites extracted from their food or formed by de novo biosynthesis (Johnson & Willows, 1999; Wägele et al., 2006; Cimino & Ghiselin, 2009) [68,69,70]. Some groups can acquire the cnidocysts from cnidarian prey organisms, which they are able to use for self-defense (Edmunds, 1966) [71]. Through a similar process, other groups can acquire functional chloroplasts from their algae food and use them to form, through photosynthesis, carbohydrates for their own nourishment (de Vries et al., 2014) [72]. Diets in sea slugs can be very specific, although across the “sea slugs” as a whole there are carnivores, detritivores and herbivores. As slow-moving, less motile life forms, sea slugs prey on mostly sessile or slowly moving food sources. All sea slugs are hermaphroditic and have complex reproductive strategies, typically involving mutual sperm transfer and storage until the eggs are ready for fertilization and release. They are also the only metazoan life form whose sperm and eggs are produced within the same follicles. Egg masses are laid in ribbons, sometimes arranged in spirals or bubble-shaped structures, held together by various mucus layers (Todd, 1981) [67]. Furthermore, some species are important model organisms in various disciplines of science, ranging from neurobiology to ecotoxicology and even pharmaceutical research (Wahidullah et al., 2006 [73]; Nimbs et al., 2017 [74,75]; Zhuo et al., 2022 [76]), In this work, we consider heterobranch sea slugs to include those taxa that once comprised the now obsolete and not monophyletic group “Opisthobranchia”, but also to include the taxa Acteonoidea, Pteropoda and Ringiculoidea.
The sea slugs of the Southern Ocean, although well-known from some areas (i.e., the southern tip of South America, Tasmania, Australia, the South Island of New Zealand and parts of Antarctica), have not previously been studied at a whole-ocean scale. Consequently, the main objective of the present study was to generate a comprehensive list of sea slug taxa found across the entirety of the Southern Ocean and to quantitatively compare assemblages found within and among regions. Additionally, a taxonomic part has been developed to provide information on species records, including distributions and matters of note.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Data Collection

The data used in this study were distilled mainly from the published literature. Analyzing more than two hundred publications, we retrieved a substantial set of reports and studies with reference to opisthobranch species reported across the study area (the Southern Ocean). In addition to those mentioned above, many other publications were analyzed and are cited in the taxonomic part for each species. The databases of the ECOQUIM I expedition (2003–2004) carried out in the Weddell Sea aboard the RV Polarstern and ECOQUIM II (2006) carried out aboard the BIO Hespérides in the South Shetland area have also been analyzed (MB participated in both campaigns), also the Australian Antarctic Database [77]. Unpublished data are also provided on species collected by the first author in some of his campaigns in Antarctica. A presence/absence table was created using all species records which were collated into areas and zones.

2.2. Geographic Areas and Zones

In the biodiversity and taxonomy section, the following areas were taken into account to clarify the data on the presence of species in the different places of the Southern Ocean (Figure 1):
  • Patagonia/Magellan area, which includes the coasts of Chile and Argentina, south 41° S.
  • Subantarctic area, which includes the following zones: Falkland (Malvinas) Is., South Georgia Is., South Orkney Is., South Sandwich Is., Bouvet Is., Prince Edward and Crozet Is., Kerguelen Is., and Macquarie Is.
  • Tasmania Island area.
  • South Island, New Zealand area.
  • Antarctic area, considering the following four zones: the Weddell Sea, including the sea of the same name, the eastern part of the Antarctic Peninsula, the Lazarev Sea and the Riiser-Larsen Sea; West Antarctica, including the western part of the Antarctic Peninsula, the South Shetland Islands, the Bellingshausen Sea, Peter I Island and the Amundsen Sea; the Ross Sea, including the Ross Sea, the Somov Sea, Adélie Land and the D’Urville Sea; and East Antarctica, including Enderby Land, the Cosmonaut Sea, the Cooperation Sea, the Davis Sea and the Mawson Sea.
Figure 1. Biogeographic Southern Ocean zones considered in the present study: 1: Patagonia/Magellan; 2: Falkland (Malvinas) Is.; 3: South Georgia Is.; 4: South Orkney Is.; 5: South Sandwich Is.; 6: Bouvet Is.; 7: Kerguelen Is.; 8: Prince Edward/Crozet Is.; 9: Macquarie Is.; 10 Tasmania; 11: South Island, New Zealand. Names of other marine areas in Antarctica: 12: Amundsen Sea; 13: Bellingshausen Sa; 14: South Shetland Is.; 15: Lazarev Sea; 16: Riiser-Larsen Sea; 17: Cosmonaut Sea; 18: Cooperation Sea; 19: Davis Sea; 20: Mawson Sea; 21: D’Urville Sea; 22: Somov Sea.
Figure 1. Biogeographic Southern Ocean zones considered in the present study: 1: Patagonia/Magellan; 2: Falkland (Malvinas) Is.; 3: South Georgia Is.; 4: South Orkney Is.; 5: South Sandwich Is.; 6: Bouvet Is.; 7: Kerguelen Is.; 8: Prince Edward/Crozet Is.; 9: Macquarie Is.; 10 Tasmania; 11: South Island, New Zealand. Names of other marine areas in Antarctica: 12: Amundsen Sea; 13: Bellingshausen Sa; 14: South Shetland Is.; 15: Lazarev Sea; 16: Riiser-Larsen Sea; 17: Cosmonaut Sea; 18: Cooperation Sea; 19: Davis Sea; 20: Mawson Sea; 21: D’Urville Sea; 22: Somov Sea.
Diversity 17 00330 g001

3. Results

3.1. General Biodiversity Results

A total of 394 species of heterobranch sea slugs have been reported across the Southern Ocean. Species richness across the regions ranged from 154 in Tasmania to only 3 taxa at Macquarie Island (Figure 2). As found across much of the globe, where species richness tends to be higher in lower latitudes, here, locations north of ~45° S were found to exhibit the highest species diversity.
Grouping the taxa in taxonomic order revealed that the Nudibranchia is the most diverse, with 209 species, followed by 90 in Cephalaspidea and 40 in Pteropoda. Other orders are represented by 17 or fewer species (Table 1). Tasmania and the South Island of New Zealand exhibit the highest numbers of species, with 154 and 120 species, respectively, followed by Antarctica with 89 species and the Patagonia/Magellan region with 71 species. The different Subantarctic zones record a lower number of species (Table 1 and Figure 2). It should be noted that sampling efforts are very uneven in the different areas studied, and this has a powerful impact on the knowledge of their biodiversity.

3.2. The Sea Slugs of the Patagonia/Magellan Zone

A total of 71 species were recorded from the Patagonian/Magallanic zone (south of 41° S), of which more than half (n = 39) were nudibranchs, 13 were cephalaspideans, 8 were pteropods, 4 were acteonimorphs, 4 were sacoglossans and 3 were pleurobranchids. There were no records of species in the orders Ringiculimorpha, Umbraculida, Runcinacea and Aplysiida. The first opisthobranch records from this region were from the end of the 19th century. The earliest were from Bergh, 1884, and Pelseneer, 1887, with both works resulting from the “Challenger” Expedition, and later Rochebune and Mabille, 1889, published the mollusks from Cape Horn. At the beginning of the 20th century, Strebel (1905) [37] produced a monograph on the mollusks of the Magellanic region. More recently, “sea slugs” appear in general works on Magellanic mollusks by Carcelles and Williamson, 1951 [78]; Carcelles, 1953 [26]; Castellanos et al., 1987a, 1987b [79,80]; Cárdenas et al., 2008 [60]; Linse, 1999 [81] and Forcelli, 2000 [38]. The first work that focused on sea slugs was that of Castellanos et al. (1993) [58] with a descriptive catalogue of Magellanic species. This was followed by studies dealing with individual taxa (Muniain & Ortea, 1999 [82]; Valdés & Muniain, 2002 [83]; Price et al., 2011 [84]; Rosenfeld & Aldea, 2011 [85]; Zelaya et al., 2011 [86]; Valdés & McLean, 2015 [87]; Salvador & Cunha, 2020 [88]). The most complete study of Magellanic sea slugs was published by Schrödl, across several works (1999a, 1999b, 2000a, 2003) [63,89,90] which span both the Pacific and Atlantic Magellanic coasts; his inventory from 2003 includes a total of 65 species of Nudipleura (Nudibranchia and Pleurobranchida), 34 of them from south of 41° S (Chilean Patagonia, Strait of Magellan and the Argentine Magellan area). Schrödl also reviewed previous works, synonymizing 28 taxa, and determined 5 to be nomina dubia. Schrödl et al. (2005) [91] and Schrödl and Grau (2006) [92] also provided data on species from remote areas of the southern Chilean coast (Comau Fjord, Ipún Is. and the Chonos Archipelago). Images of most species in the Magellanic zone can be seen in Schrödl (2003) [63].

3.3. The Sea Slugs of the Subantarctic Zones

Knowledge of species across Subantarctic areas is very patchy. Some areas are highly remote and thus difficult to access, and, as a result, their diversity is very poorly known. Comparatively well-researched areas include the Falkland Islands (Malvinas) and the islands that comprise the Scotia Arc. A total of 29 species have been recorded from the Falklands, mainly Nudibranchia (15 species) and Cephalaspidea (9 species) (Bergh, 1884 [50]; Eliot, 1907b [93]; Powell, 1951 [32]; Dadon & Chauvin, 1998 [59]), with 4 species using falklandica as a specific epithet.
The South Georgia group forms part of the Scotia Arc that is closest to the southern tip of South America and the Falklands, and various expeditions have studied their sea slug biodiversity, with 36 taxa recorded, mainly Nudibranchia (n = 15) and Cephalaspidea (n = 10) (Martens & Pfeffer, 1886 [29]; Strebel, 1908 [94]; Powell, 1951 [32]; Seager, 1978 [95]; García et al. 1993 [96]; Troncoso et al., 1997 [64]; Schrödl, 2000a [97]; Zelaya, 2005 [47]; Schächinger et al., 2022 [98]).
In the South Orkney Islands, 17 species have been recorded, with Nudibranchia comprising 9 of those species (Bergh, 1884 [50]; Eliot, 1905 [99]; Powell, 1951, 1960 [32,33]; Wägele et al., 1995 [100]; Troncoso et al., 1997 [64]; Schächinger et al., 2022 [98]).
In the South Sandwich Islands, 12 species have been recorded, of which 5 are Pteropoda (Willan & Bertsch, 1987 [101]; Powell, 1951 [32]; Dell, 1990 [27]; Linse, 1999 [81]; Schrödl et al., 2016 [102]; Schächinger et al., 2022 [98]; Peralta-Serrano et al. 2025 [103]).
In the Kerguelen Islands, there are records by Watson (1883) [104], Bergh (1884) [50], Thiele (1912) [30], Powell (1951) [32], Vicente (1973) [105], Wägele (1989) [106], Schrödl (2000a) [97] and Troncoso et al. (2001) [107], with a total of 15 species known: Cephalaspidea (n = 8), Nudibranchia (n = 5) and 2 Acteonimorpha.
On the remote island of Bouvet, halfway between the Cape of Good Hope, South Africa, and the Antarctic Sea ice limit, low survey efforts have resulted in few records. Here, six species are known, three of them Nudibranchia, with one species, Myrella dantarti (Ballesteros & Avila, 2006), considered endemic to the island (Ballesteros & Avila, 2006 [108]; Linse, 2006 [109]; Moles et al., 2016a, b [110,111]).
Only ten species have been recorded for Prince Edward and Crozet Islands; six of them are Pteropoda (Branch et al., 1991 [112]; Hunt et al., 2008 [61]).
The only studies from Macquarie Is. were published by Powell (1955 [113]) and Merilees and Burn (1969) [114], with only three species of Nudibranchia reported.

3.4. The Sea Slugs of Tasmania

Of all the Southern Ocean regions, the Tasmanian sea slug fauna is the most diverse, with 154 listed species, of which 93 are nudibranchs and 3 are cephalaspideans. Proximity to the Australian mainland and the transport of warmer waters via several south-flowing boundary currents over millennia has generated a regionally rich and highly endemic fauna (Phillips, 2001 [115]; Butler et al., 2010 [116]). Tasmania’s documented diversity is indicative of the relatively high level of effort given to studying the region’s sea slug fauna, which reflects the relatively high accessibility of the region and the larger population.
Records and descriptions of Tasmanian mollusca were scattered amongst the early literature but united into a singular inventory or “census” by Tenison Woods in 1877 [117]. This was later expanded by Tate and May in 1901 [118], again by May (1921) [119], by Kershaw in 1955 [120], by Grove et al. in 2006 [121], and, lastly, by Grove in 2018 [122]. Shelled mollusks were reviewed by Richmond (1992) [123]. Tasmanian species diversity, distributions and general biology were considered as part of the entire Australian fauna by Beesley et al. (1998) [124].
In the early 20th century, Bergh (1904, 1905) [125,126] described several species of sea slugs using material collected from northern Tasmania: the nomen dubium Aeolidiella faustina Bergh, 1900, which was considered by Burn (2006) [127] to be synonymous with Baeolidia macleayi (Angas, 1864)); Alloiodoris marmorata (Bergh, 1904); Discodoris dubia Bergh, 1904, and D. egena Bergh, 1904 (both last names now synonymous with Paradoris dubia (Bergh, 1904) by Dayrat (2010) [128] and MolluscaBase (2025a) [129]); Chromodoris tasmaniensis Bergh, 1905 (now Goniobranchus tasmaniensis (Bergh, 1905) according to Johnson & Gosliner, 2012 [130]); Aphelodoris luctuosa Bergh, 1905 (now considered by MolluscaBase (2025b) [131] to be a junior homonym of A. berghi Odhner, 1934); and Acanthodoris metulifera Bergh, 1905. Rudman described several species in the 1980s, [132,133,134,135] including Cadlina tasmanica Rudman, 1990; Chromodoris ambigua Rudman, 1987; Chromodoris multimaculosa Rudman, 1987 (now Goniobranchus multimaculosus (Rudman, 1987) according to Johnson & Gosliner, 2012) [130]; Noumea aureopunctata Rudman, 1987 (now Verconia aureopunctata (Rudman, 1987) according to MolluscaBase (2025f) [136]; and Noumea closeorum Rudman, 1986 (now Verconia closeorum (Rudman, 1986) according to MolluscaBase (2025g) [137]. The sea slugs of the north coast and Bass Strait Islands were consolidated into a regional checklist, along with those from Victoria, Australia, by Burn in 2006 [127], which lists some 91 Tasmanian species, of which 14 have their type locality in Tasmania.
Southeastern Australia is a global-warming hot spot (Bowen et al., 2005 [138]; Ridgway & Hill, 2009 [139]; Suthers et al., 2011 [140]; Cresswell et al., 2016 [141]), with the south-flowing Eastern Australian Current pushing warm water further into the Bass Strait and onto the northern and eastern coasts of Tasmania, which have become the leading edges of range-shifting taxa (Pitt et al., 2010 [142]; Ramos et al., 2015 [143]). Many sea slug species have been gradually shifting their ranges poleward in response to latitudinal shifts in sea surface temperature isotherms, particularly on the east coast of the Australian mainland (Nimbs et al., 2015, 2016 [144,145]; Nimbs & Smith, 2016; 2017a, 2017b, 2018 [74,146,147,148]; Smith & Nimbs, 2022 [149]). As a result, it is only a matter of time before warm-temperate taxa begin to appear in Tasmanian waters. This means that sea slug diversity in Tasmania is likely to increase at a greater rate than elsewhere in the Southern Ocean. Images of heterobranch sea slugs from Tasmania can be seen on the website https://molluscsoftasmania.org.au/ (accessed on 12 November 2024) which are also published in Grove, 2011 [150].

3.5. The Sea Slugs of the Southern Island of New Zealand

The rich marine mollusk fauna of New Zealand has been documented in several publications, with a comprehensive manual authored as early as 1913 by Suter [151], later superseded by the final expansive work of Powell (1979) [152]. With a view to providing workers with an updated taxonomic reference, a modern, comprehensive checklist of New Zealand marine mollusca was compiled by Spencer and Willan (1996) [153], listing a total of 5486 species for the entire country.
Early New Zealand sea slug descriptions were published in the 19th century by taxonomists including but not limited to Cheeseman (1881) [154], Rang (1828) [155], Abraham (1876) [156] and Hutton (1880) [157], and in the 20th century by Eliot (1903, 1907b) [93,158], Suter (1909) [159], Powell (1955) [113], Challis (1969) [160], Miller (1977) [161] and Rudman (1980) [132]. The first separate treatment of the sea slugs was subsequently given by Willan and Morton (1984) [162], listing some 30 species from the South Island and other southern islands.
There are 120 species of sea slugs in southern New Zealand waters, with all major groups represented. The most diverse group are the Nudibranchia (n = 47), followed by the Cephalaspidea (n = 23), Thecosomata and Gymnosomata (n = 20 and 12, respectively), 5 species of Aplysiida, 4 acteonimorphs, 4 sacoglossans, 1 runcinid and 1 ringiculid. It is in New Zealand that the pelagic “pteropods” have been most well documented, with approximately 30 species recorded, 20 of which were listed by Powell (1979). Images of New Zealand sea slugs can be seen in Willan and Davey (2020) [163].

3.6. The Antarctic Sea Slugs

A total of 89 species have been recorded from Antarctica, including the Pteropoda. Regionally, the most well-known area is the Ross Sea, with 51 species reported, whereas the other three Antarctic regions support just over 30 species each. The most diverse orders are the Nudibranchia with 40 species and the Cephalaspidea with 27. There are no records of species from the Ringiculimorpha, Umbraculida, Runcinacea, Aplysiida and Sacoglossa.
The earliest records of Antarctic sea slugs were published using data from research expeditions conducted at the end of the 19th century and the beginning of the 20th century. Specimens were collected and preserved by early workers, with descriptions generated by Vayssière (1906a and 1906b, 1917) [52,164,165], Eliot (1907a, 1909) [166,167], Thiele (1912) [30], Hedley (1916) [168] and Odhner (1934) [169]. There are numerous recent works that record or describe new species from the Ross Sea (Powell, 1958 [35] Vicente & Arnaud, 1974 [56]; Wägele, 1989 [106]; Cattaneo-Vietti, 1991 [57]; Brueggeman et al., 1999 [170]; Valdés et al., 2011, 2012 [171,172]; among others); the Weddell Sea (Hain, 1990 [173]; Wägele, 1990a and 1990b [174,175]); the Antarctic Peninsula (Troncoso et al., 1996 [176]; Troncoso et al., 1999 [177]; Millen & Martynov, 2005 [178]); the Bellingshausen Sea (Aldea & Troncoso, 2010 [179,180]); the Amundsen Sea (Moreau et al., 2013 [45]); and the Davis Sea (Minichev, 1972 [62]; Martynov, 2006 [181]). Other recent publications that deal with gastropods more broadly also include references to some of the sea slugs from Antarctica (Dell, 1990 [27]; Engl, 2012 [28]). Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11 provide photographs of live specimens of some of the most important species of Antarctic sea slugs. Images of Antarctic sea slugs can be seen in Brueggeman et al. (1999 [170], Engl (2012) [28] and Rauschert and Arntz (2015) [182].

3.7. The Pteropoda of the Southern Ocean

All species in this group are pelagic. As a result, many species have a broad geographical distribution since they are entrained in ocean currents and are unable to alter their movements on a large scale. Several authors have recorded up to 40 species of Pteropoda, including Pelseneer, 1887 [51]; Smith, 1902 [183]; Hedley, 1916 [168]; Powell, 1951, 1960 [32,33]; Minichev, 1972 [62]; Van der Spoel et al., 1992 [184]; Dadon and Chauvin, 1998 [59]; Brueggeman et al. al., 1999 [170]; Linse, 1999 [81]; Forcelli, 2000 [38]; Hunt et al., 2008 [157]; Würzberg et al., 2009 [185]; Moreau et al., 2013 [45]; and Schrödl et al., 2016 [102]. Of the Southern Ocean Pteropods, 26 species are Euthecosomata, 2 are Pseudothecosomata and 12 are Gymnosomata. The most well documented region is the southern islands of New Zealand, with 32 species recorded (Spencer et al., 2016 [41]). In Section 4, the importance of the Pteropoda to pelagic ecosystems in the Southern Ocean is briefly discussed.

3.8. Taxonomy and Records

This section provides taxonomic data on all Southern Ocean heterobranch sea slug species recorded south of the 41° S parallel. For the records of the species, the different zones considered in this work and indicated in previous sections were taken into account, and they are ordered as follows: Patagonia/Magellan, Falkland Is., the other Subantarctic areas, Tasmania Is., the South Island of New Zealand and, finally, the different Antarctic zones. Within each zone, the records are arranged chronologically. Interesting remarks are made about the biology, particular taxonomy or biogeography of many species. Unidentified species cited simply as sp. have not been included in this section. For the taxonomy and nomenclature of the species, the indications of the World Register of Marine Species (WoRMS) and of various recently published articles have been followed.
Phyllum Mollusca.
Class Gastropoda Cuvier, 1795.
Subclass Heterobranchia Burmeister, 1837.
Infraclass Mesoneura Brezinger, Schrödl & Kano, 2021.
Superfamily Tjaernoeioidea Warén, 1991.
Family Parvaplustridae Brenzinger, Schrödl & Kano, 2021.
Genus Parvaplustrum A. W. B. Powell, 1951.
  Parvaplustrum tenerum A. W. B. Powell, 1951.
  Records: Falkland Is. (Powell, 1951; Forcelli, 2000).

Infraclass Euthyneura Spegel, 1881.
Subterclass Acteonimorpha.
Superfamily Acteonoidea d’Orbigny, 1843.
Family Acteonidae d’Orbigny, 1843.
Genus Acteon Montfort, 1810.
Acteon antarcticus Thiele, 1912.
Records: South Sandwich Islands (Dell, 1990); South Georgia Is. (Powell, 1951; South Orkney Is. (Carcelles, 1953); Kerguelen Is. (R. B. Watson, 1883, as Acteon (Acteonina) edentulus; Powell, 1957; Dell, 1990); South Shetland Is. (Powell, 1951; Dell, 1990; Aldea & Troncoso, 2008; Troncoso & Aldea, 2008 [186]); Antarctica (Powell, 1958); Bellingshausen Sea (Aldea et al., 2008 [179]; Aldea et al., 2009 [187]; Aldea & Troncoso, 2010); Peter I Is. (Aldea et al., 2009 [187]); Ross Sea (Dell, 1990; Ghiglione et al., 2013); Davis Sea (Thiele, 1912; Dell, 1990); Enderby Land, East Antarctica (Powell, 1958).
Remarks: Dell (1990) maintains that the presence of an operculum and Acteon type radula in a specimen collected from the Ross Sea confirms that this species belongs in Acteon, in contrast to Marcus’ (1976, p25) [188] tentative suggestion that this taxon may belong in Toledonia.

Acteon fasuloi Crocetta, Romani, Simone & Rolán, 2017.
Records: Patagonia (Castellanos et al., 1987a and b; Linse, 1999; Forcelli, 2000).
Remarks: This species was originally described as Acteon elongatus Castellanos, Rolán & Bartolotta, 1987, however, A. elongatus was already occupied by a fossil species, so it was renamed A. fasuloi (Romani et al., 2017) [189].

Acteon retusus Verco, 1907.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Genus Neactaeonina Thiele, 1912.
Neactaeonina argentina Zelaya, Schejter & Ituarte, 2011.
Records: North Argentinian Patagonia (Zelaya et al., 2011).
Remarks: The southernmost limit distribution of this species is 43°14.18′ S, 59°37.27′ W at the Argentinian continental shelf, 100 m depth.

Neactaenonina cingulata (Strebel, 1908).
Records: South Georgia Is. (Strebel, 1908; Zelaya, 2005); South Shetland Is. (Powell, 1951); Bransfield Strait (Engl, 2012).

Neactaeonina edentula (R. B. Watson, 1883).
Records: South Georgia Is. (Powell, 1951); South Orkney Is. (Carcelles, 1953); Kerguelen Is. (R. B. Watson, 1883, as Acteon (Acteonina) edentulus; Powell, 1957; Dell, 1990); South Shetland Is. (Powell, 1951; Dell, 1990; Aldea & Troncoso, 2008; Troncoso & Aldea, 2008 [186]); Bellingshausen Sea (Aldea et al., 2008; Aldea et al., 2009; Aldea & Troncoso, 2010); Peter I Is. (Aldea et al., 2009); Ross Sea (Dell, 1990).
Remarks: Engl (2012) claims that Aldea & Troncoso’s N. edentula record from Bellingshausen Sea is potentially another Neactaeonina species.

Neactaeonina fragilis Thiele, 1912.
Records: Ross Sea (Powell, 1951); Adelie Land (Hedley, 1916); Davis Sea (Thiele, 1912); Enderby Land (Powell, 1958).

Neactaeonina inexpectata Dell, 1956.
Records: South Island and Chatham Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Genus Lanayrella Salvador & Cunha, 2020.
Lanayrella vagabunda (Mabille, 1885).
Records: Cap Horn (Rochebrune & Mabille, 1889, as Tornatella vagabunda); Patagonia (Linse, 1999; Forcelli, 2000; both as Acteon vagabundus).
Remarks: The records of this species cited as belonging to the genera Tornatella or Acteon have recently been included within the new genus Lanayrella (Salvador & Cunha, 2020) included in the family Acteonidae.

Lanayrella ringei (Strebel, 1905).
Records: Argentinean Tierra del Fuego (Strebel, 1905, as Acteon ringei).
Remarks: This species had been synonymized with L. vagabunda until the recent work by Salvador & Cunha (2020) considered it as valid.

Genus Puntacteon Kuroda & Habe, 1961.
Puntacteon cratericulatus (Hedley, 1906).
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Genus Obrussena Iredale, 1930.
Obrussena bracteata (Iredale, 1925).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Genus Pupa Röding, 1798.
Pupa affinis (A. Adams, 1855).
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Family Aplustridae Gray, 1847.
Genus Bullina A. Férussac, 1822.
Bullina lineata (J. E. Gray, 1825).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Subterclass Ringipleura.
Superorder Ringiculimorpha.
Superfamily Ringiculoidea R. A. Philippi, 1853.
Family Ringiculidae R. A. Philippi, 1853.
Genus Microglyphis Dall, 1902.
Microglyphis curtula (Dall, 1890).
Records: Magellan Strait (Dall, 1902, as Actaeon (Mycroglyphis) curtulus) [190]).

Genus Ringicula Deshayes, 1838.
Ringicula delecta Murdoch & Suter, 1906.
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Powell, 1979).

Superorder Nudipleura Wägele & Willan, 2000.
Order Pleurobranchida.
Superfamily Pleurobranchoidea Gray, 1827.
Family Pleurobranchidae Gray, 1827.
Genus Bathyberthella Willan, 1983.
Bathyberthella antarctica Willan & Bertsch, 1987 (Figure 3A).
Records: South Georgia Is. (Wägele & Willan, 1994 [191]; Zelaya, 2005); Shag Rocks (SOMBASE, 2024); South Sandwich Is. (Willan & Bertsch, 1987); South Orkney Is. (Garcia et al., 1994) [192]; Bouvet Island (Arntz et al., 2006); Weddell Sea (Wägele & Willan, 1994 [191]; Troncoso et al., 1996; Rauschert & Arntz, 2015; present work); Antarctic Peninsula (Wägele & Willan, 1994) [191]; South Shetland Is. (Willan & Bertsch, 1987); Bellingshausen Sea (Aldea et al., 2008; Aldea et al., 2009); Ross Sea (Brueggeman et al., 1999; Schiaparelli et al., 2006; Ghiglione et al., 2017 [193]).
Remarks: This species can reach 20 cm in length (personal observation by the first author).

Bathyberthella orcadensis (F. J. García, García-Gómez, Troncoso & Cervera, 1994).
Records: South Orkney Is. (García, et al., 1994, as Parabathyberthella orcadensis; Troncoso et al., 1997).

Bathyberthella tomasi (F. J. García, Troncoso, Cervera & García-Gómez, 1996).
Records: South Orkney Is. (García et al., 1996, as Polyctenidia tomasi) [194].

Bathyberthella zelandiae Willan, 1983 (Figure 3B).
Records: Weddell Sea (Menacho, 2011) [195]; South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).
Remarks: Of this species, reported at 1640 m on the continental slope of the Bounty Trough (SW New Zealand), only one specimen has been caught in the deep waters (1600 m) of the Weddell Sea.

Genus Berthella Blainville, 1824.
Berthella medietas Burn, 1962.
Records: Northern and eastern Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018); South Island, Chatham Islands and Subantarctic islands of New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Berthella patagonica (A. d’Orbigny, 1835).
Records: Patagonia (Powell, 1960, as Bouvieira patagonica (A. d’Orbigny, 1836); Linse, 1999; Argentina, Forcelli, 2000).; Falkland Islands (Powell, 1960).

Berthella platei (Bergh, 1898).
Records: Patagonia (Powell, 1960; Linse, 1999; Argentina, Forcelli, 2000; Chile, Schrödl, 1999a, Schrödl et al., 2005); Falkland Is. (Schrödl, 1999b).

Berthella ornata (Cheeseman, 1878).
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Berthella serenitas (Burn, 1962).
Records: Northern Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Genus Pleurobranchus Cuvier, 1804.
Pleurobranchus hilli (Hedley, 1894)
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Genus Tomthompsonia Wägele & Hain, 1991.
Tomthompsonia antarctica (Thiele, 1912).
Records: Weddell Sea (Wägele & Hain, 1991, as T. spiroconchalis) [196]; Davis Sea (Thiele, 1912).
Remarks: This species was initially described by Thiele (1912) based on empty shells as Adeorbis antarcticus and belonging to the “prosobranch” mollusks. Wägele and Hain (1991) discovered live specimens of this pleurobranchid and carried out an extensive anatomical study, finding that it has a spiraled internal shell and describing the new genus Tomthompsonia.
Figure 3. (A): Bathyberthella antarctica, specimen from the Weddell Sea; (B): Bathyberthella zelandiae, specimen from the Weddell Sea; (C,D): Antarctophiline alata, specimen from the South Shetland Islands; (E): Newnesia antarctica, specimen from the South Shetland Islands; (F): Hocius joani, preserved specimen from the Weddell Sea. Original photographs by M. Ballesteros. Scale bars are 10 mm.
Figure 3. (A): Bathyberthella antarctica, specimen from the Weddell Sea; (B): Bathyberthella zelandiae, specimen from the Weddell Sea; (C,D): Antarctophiline alata, specimen from the South Shetland Islands; (E): Newnesia antarctica, specimen from the South Shetland Islands; (F): Hocius joani, preserved specimen from the Weddell Sea. Original photographs by M. Ballesteros. Scale bars are 10 mm.
Diversity 17 00330 g003
Family Pleurobranchaeidae Pilsbry, 1896.
Genus Pleurobranchaea Leue, 1813.
Pleurobranchaea inconspicua Bergh, 1897.
Records: Argentine Patagonia (San Matias Gulf, 41°6′ S; San José Gulf, 42°25′ S; Muniain et al., 2007).
Remarks: This species is distributed from Cape Hatteras, North Carolina (35° N), to San José Gulf, Argentina (42° S) (Muniain et al., 2007) [197]. It may exhibit an amphiatlantic distribution due to records on the western coast of Africa and the eastern Mediterranean (Marcus & Gosliner, 1984) [198].

Pleurobranchaea maculata (Quoy & Gaimard, 1832).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018); South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016); Argentine Patagonia (Puerto Madryn, 42°46′5″ S, Farias et al., 2015; Battini et al., 2021 [199]).
Remarks: This species, native to Australia and New Zealand, has invaded the Argentine coasts since 2009 (Farias et al., 2015) [200]. It is a toxic species that can accumulate a powerful tetrodotoxin.

Order Nudibranchia Cuvier, 1817.
Suborder Doridina.
Superfamily Polyceroidea Alder & Hancock, 1845.
Family Aegiridae P. Fischer, 1883.
Genus Aegires Lovén, 1844.
Aegires albus Thiele, 1912 (Figure 4A,B).
Records: Weddell Sea (Wägele, 1987 [201]; Rauschert & Arntz, 2015); King George Is., South Shetland Is. (Schrödl et al., 2016); Ross Sea (Hedley, 1916; Odhner, 1934, as Aegires protectus; Schiaparelli et al., 2006; Ghiglione et al., 2013 [202]); Leopols III Bay, Princess Ragnhild coast (Troncoso et al., 1996); Davis Sea, East Antarctica (Thiele, 1912; Wägele, 1987).
Aegires exeches Fahey & Gosliner, 2004.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Superfamily Onchidoridoidea Gray, 1827.
Family Onchidorididae Gray, 1827.
Genus Acanthodoris J. E. Gray, 1850.
Acanthodoris falklandica Eliot, 1907.
Records: Patagonia (Linse, 1999; Argentina; Forcelli, 2000; Chile; Linse, 1999; Schrödl et al., 2005, Aldea et al. 2011 [203]); Falkland Is. (Eliot, 1907b; Linse, 1999).

Acanthodoris metulifera Bergh, 1905.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018); southern Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015).

Acanthodoris mollicella Abraham, 1877.
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Acanthodoris pilosa (Abildgaard, 1789).
Records: Subantactic islands of New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Acanthodoris vatheleti Mabille and Rochebrune, 1889.
Records: Punta Arenas, Orange Harbour, Cape Horn (Rochebrune & Mabille, 1889).
Remarks: This species is considered in WoRMS as nomen dubium.

Genus Idaliadoris Furfaro and Trainito, 2022.
Idaliadoris maugeansis (Burn, 1958).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (as Onchidoris maugeansis) (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Genus Diaphorodoris Iredale & O’Donoghue, 1923.
Diaphorodoris mitsuii (Baba, 1938).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018) (as Diaphorodoris sp. in Burn, 2015).

Family Akiodorididae Millen and Martynov, 2005.
Genus Armodoris Minichev, 1972.
Armodoris antarctica, Minichev, 1972.
Records: King George Is. (Millen & Martynov, 2005); Davis Sea, East Antarctica (Minichev, 1972).

Armodoris anudeorum Á. Valdés, Moran & H. A. Woods, 2011.
Records: McMurdo Sound, Ross Sea (Cattaneo-Vietti et al., 2000, as A. Antarctica [204]; Valdés et al. 2011).

Genus Doridunculus G.O. Sars, 1878.
Doridunculus punkus, Moles, Wägele, Uhl & C. Ávila, 2017 (Figure 4C,D).
Records: Weddell Sea (Moles et al., 2016b; this work).
Remarks: A single specimen of this species was collected in the Eastern Weddell Sea from a genus that contains two other species that are distributed in cold or deep waters of the northern hemisphere (Moles et al., 2016b).

Genus Prodoridunculus Thiele, 1912.
Prodoridunculus gaussianus Thiele, 1912.
Records: Ross Sea (Ghiglione et al., 2013; Schiaparelli et al., 2014 [205]); Davis Sea, East Antarctica (Thiele, 1912).

Family Corambidae Bergh, 1871.
Genus Corambe Bergh, 1869.
Corambe lucea Er. Marcus, 1959.
Records: Patagonia (Linse, 1999; Argentina, Forcelli, 2000; Chile, Linse, 1999; Schrödl et al., 2005).

Family Goniodorididae H. Adams & A. Adams, 1854.
Genus Ancula Lovén, 1846.
Ancula fuegiensis Odhner, 1926.
Records: Patagonia (Linse, 1999; Argentina, Forcelli, 2000; Chile, Linse, 1999).

Ancula mappae (Burn, 1961).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Genus Bermudella Odhner, 1941.
Bermudella mija (Burn, 1967).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018; as Okenia mija); South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016, as Okenia mija).
Remarks: Burn (2006) suggests that the larger size of Tasmanian animals compared to those animals from the type locality (Okenia mija; Torquay, Victoria, Australia) may suggest the presence of another species.

Bermudella angelensis (Lance, 1966).
Records: Patagonia (Chile, Linse, 1999).
Remarks: Until the work of Paz-Sedano et al. (2024) [206] this species was included within the genus Okenia.
Figure 4. Aegires albus (A) in lateral view and (B) in dorsal view, specimen from the Weddell Sea; photographs by M. Rauschert. Doridunculus punkus, specimen from the Weddell Sea, (C) in dorsal view and (D) in lateral view, with the dorsal crest of the animal shown with an arrow; original photographs by M. Ballesteros. Scale bars are 10 mm.
Figure 4. Aegires albus (A) in lateral view and (B) in dorsal view, specimen from the Weddell Sea; photographs by M. Rauschert. Doridunculus punkus, specimen from the Weddell Sea, (C) in dorsal view and (D) in lateral view, with the dorsal crest of the animal shown with an arrow; original photographs by M. Ballesteros. Scale bars are 10 mm.
Diversity 17 00330 g004
Genus Pelagella J. E. Gray, 1850.
Pelagella castanea (Alder & Hancock, 1845).
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016, as Goniodoris castanea).
Remarks: This species, native to European Atlantic waters and also present in the Mediterranean, is considered an alien species in New Zealand waters. Until the work of Paz-Sedano et al. (2023) [207], this species was included within the genus Goniodoris.

Pelagella punctata (Bergh, 1905).
Records: South Island, New Zealand (as Goniodoris punctata) (Spencer et al., 2016).
Remarks: See taxonomic commentary of P. castanea.

Genus Trapania Pruvot-Fol, 1931.
Trapania brunnea Rudman, 1987.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Trapania rudmani M. C. Miller, 1981.
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Superfamily Polyceroidea Alder & Hancock, 1845.
Family Polyceridae Alder & Hancock, 1845.
Genus Crimora Alder & Hancock, 1845.
Crimora multidigitalis (Burn, 1957).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Genus Gymnodoris W. Stimpson, 1855.
Gymnodoris alba (Bergh, 1877).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Gymnodoris arnoldi (Burn, 1957).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Genus Holoplocamus Odhner, 1926.
Holoplocamus papposus Odhner, 1926.
Records: Patagonia (Argentina; Powell, 1960; Forcelli, 2000; Chile, Linse, 1999; Schrödl, 2003).

Genus Kaloplocamus Bergh, 1880.
Kaloplocamus ramosus (Cantraine, 1835).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Genus Paliolla Burn, 1958.
Paliolla cooki (Angas, 1864).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Genus Plocamopherus Rüppell and Leuckart, 1828.
Plocamopherus imperialis Angas, 1864.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Genus Polycera Cuvier, 1816.
Polycera capensis Quoy & Gaimard, 1824.
Records: Eastern Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Polycera hedgpethi Er. Marcus, 1964.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).
Remarks: P. hedgpethi is a cosmopolitan species originating from the coasts of California. It has been recorded in almost all seas, such as the North American Pacific, and Costa Rica, West Africa, South Africa, New Zealand, Australia, Japan, Northern Europe, the Northern Iberian Peninsula, the western Mediterranean and the Adriatic Sea (Pontes, 2023) [208]. It is assumed that this wide distribution and presence near commercial ports is due to transportation via ship fouling.

Polycera janjukia Burn, 1962.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018), southeastern Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015).

Polycera maddoxi M. C. Miller, 2005.
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Polycera marplatensis Franceschi, 1928.
Records: Patagonia (Argentina, Linse, 1999; Forcelli, 2000).

Polycera priva Er. Marcus, 1959.
Records: Patagonia (Linse, 1999; Argentina, Forcelli, 2000; Chile, Schrödl, 2003; Schrödl et al., 2005).

Genus Tambja Burn, 1962.
Tambja morosa (Bergh, 1877).
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Tambja tenuilineata M. C. Miller & Haagh, 2005.
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Tambja verconis (Basedow & Hedley, 1905).
Records: Northern and eastern Tasmania (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018); South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Genus Thecacera Fleming, 1828.
Thecacera darwini Pruvot-Fol, 1950.
Records: Patagonia (Argentina, Forcelli, 2000; Chile, Linse, 1999; Schrödl, 2003; Schrödl et al., 2005).

Superfamily Doridoidea Rafinesque, 1815.
Family Dorididae Rafinesque, 1815.
Genus Aphelodoris Bergh, 1879.
Aphelodoris berghi Odhner, 1924.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2006; Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Aphelodoris greeni Burn, 1966.
Records: Northern and eastern Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 1966; Grove, 2018).

Aphelodoris juliae Burn, 1966.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 1966; Grove, 2018).

Aphelodoris lawsae Burn, 1966.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Aphelodoris luctuosa (Cheeseman, 1882).
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Aphelodoris rossquicki Burn, 1966.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Aphelodoris varia (Abraham, 1877).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018); northeastern Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015).

Genus Doris Linnaeus, 1758.
Doris cameroni (J. K. Allan, 1947).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2006; Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Doris claurina (Er. Marcus, 1959).
Records: Patagonia (Linse, 1999; Argentina, Forcelli, 2000; Chile, Schrödl, 2003).
Remarks: In all cases, cited as Neodoris claurina.

Doris chrysoderma Angas, 1864.
Records: Northern Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Doris falklandica (Eliot, 1907).
Records: Falkland Is. (Eliot, 1907b, as Staurodoris).

Doris fontainii A. d’Orbigny, 1837.
Records: Patagonia (Argentina, Linse, 1999; Forcelli, 2000; Valdés & Muniain, 2002; Chile, Linse, 1999; Valdés & Muniain, 2002; Schrödl, 2003; Schrödl et al., 2005; Schrödl & Grau, 2006).
Remarks: Cited as Archidoris fontaini, Anisodoris fontaini or Doris carvi.

Doris granulatissima (Vayssière, 1917).
Records: Almirantazgo Bay, King George Is., South Shetland Is. (Vayssière, 1917); Ross Sea (Odhner, 1934); Adelie Land (Vicente & Arnaud, 1974).
Remarks: In all cases, cited as Austrodoris granulatissima. This species is considered uncertain and nomen dubium in Wägele (1990b) and in WoRMS (2024). It is likely that it belongs to the Doris kerguelenensis species complex.

Doris kerguelenensis (Bergh, 1884) (Figure 5).
Records: Patagonia (Linse, 1999; Argentina, Odhner, 1926, as Austrodoris crenulata Odhner, 1926, and Austrodoris michaelseni Odhner, 1926; Forcelli, 2000; Chile, Bergh, 1884, as Austrodoris kerguelenensis; Bergh, 1898 [209], as Archidoris rubescens Bergh 1898; Schrödl, 2003); Falkland Is. (Odhner, 1926, as Archidoris rubescens Bergh, 1898; Linse, 1999); Shag Rock-Bank (Odhner, 1926, as Archidoris rubescens Bergh, 1898); South Georgia Is. (Odhner, 1926, as Archidoris rubescens Bergh, 1898; Wägele, 1990b; García et al., 1993, as Austrodoris georgiensis F. J. García, Troncoso, García Gómez & Cervera, 1993; Troncoso et al., 1997; Linse, 1999; Zelaya, 2005); South Orkney Is. (Wägele, 1987; García et al., 1993; Barnes & Bullough, 1996 [210]; Troncoso et al., 1997; Aldea et al., 2008); Bouvet Island (Arntz et al., 2006); Marion Is. (Linse, 1999); Kerguelen Islands (Bergh, 1884, as Archidoris kerguelenensis Bergh, 1884, and A. australis Bergh, 1884; Powell, 1960, as Archidoris australis Bergh, 1884, Austrodoris tomentosa Odhner, 1934, and Austrodoris nivium Odhner, 1934; Vicente, 1973, as Austrodoris tomentosa Odhner, 1934, and Austrodoris nivium Odhner, 1934); Heard Is. (Merilees & Burn, 1969; Linse, 1999); Macquarie Is. (Merilees & Burn, 1969); Weddell Sea (Wägele, 1990b; Linse, 1999; Rauschert & Arntz, 2015); Antarctic Peninsula (Vayssiére, 1906, as Archidoris tuberculata (Müller, 1778) sensu Cuvier, 1804; Wägele, 1990b; Aldea et al., 2009, as Austrodoris georgiensis F. J. García, Troncoso, García Gómez & Cervera, 1993); South Shetland Is. (García et al., 1993; Troncoso et al., 1997; Linse, 1999; Troncoso et al., 1999; Arnaud et al. 2001 [211]); King George Is., South Shetland (Schrödl et al., 2016; present work, some animals collected by scuba diving during the BENTART 2006 Spanish Research Expedition); Peter I Is. (Aldea et al., 2009, as Austrodoris georgiensis F. J. García, Troncoso, García Gómez & Cervera, 1993); Ross Sea (Smith, 1902; Odhner, 1934, as Austrodoris macmurdensis; Odhner, 1934; Austrodoris nivium Odhner, 1934; Austrodoris tomentosa Odhner, 1934; Dayton et al., 1974 [212], as Austrodoris macmurdensis; Odhner, 1934; Cattaneo, 1991; Brueggeman et al., 1999; Linse, 1999; Cattaneo-Vietti et al., 2000; Schiaparelli et al., 2006 [213]; Ghiglione et al., 2013; Schiaparelli & Linse, 2014); Princess Ragnhild coast (Troncoso et al., 1996); Davis Sea, East Antarctica (Thiele, 1912, as Archidoris nivalis Thiele, 1812; Minichev, 1972, as Austrodoris nivium; Odhner, 1934, Austrodoris grandis; Minichev, 1972, Archidoris stellata; Minichev, 1972 y Austrodoris longa Odhner, 1926); Marguerite Bay, Adelie Land, East Antarctica (Vayssière, 1917, as Archidoris tuberculata var. antarctica Vayssière, 1917).
Remarks: This species has a long list of synonyms that are indicated in the records section. In almost all recent records, it is listed as Austrodoris kerguelenensis or A. kerguelensis. It is the most common and widely distributed marine heterobranch species, having been cited from both coasts of the South American cone, the Subantarctic islands and almost all the Antarctic coasts. Wägele (1990b) carried out a complete morphological and anatomical study on the genus Austrodoris. Moles et al. (2017b) conducted a study on spawning, embryonic development and juveniles of this species in vitro; these authors indicate that D. kerguelenensis has direct development with intracapsular embryonic development estimated to last about 13 months, with the juveniles hatching with a size of 3 mm. Ballesteros (2024) has graphically represented the different stages of the life cycle of this species. Due to its direct development, without a larval form and therefore a poor capacity for geographical dispersion, several authors have questioned whether D. kerguelenensis is a single species. Recently, due to a wide representation of specimens from very diverse localities, from Antarctic, Subantarctic and Magellanic environments, molecular analyses have shown that D. kerguelenensis comprises a complex of 59 different species (Wilson et al., 2009 [214]; Maroni & Wilson, 2022 [215]; Maroni et al., 2022 [216]). There may also be more species of this complex in unstudied areas of the Southern Ocean. Because putative species in the D. kerguelenensis complex remain to be described, we consider all records to be those of D. kerguelenensis sensu lato.

Doris luteola Couthouy in Gould, 1852.
Records: Orange Harbour, Cape Horn (Gould, 1852 [217]; Rochebrune & Mabille, 1889).
Remarks: This species is considered nomen dubium in WoRMS.

Doris nanula (Bergh, 1904).
Records: South Island and Subantarctic islands of New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Doris nivalis (Thiele, 1912).
Records: Ross Sea (Hedley, 1916); Davis Sea, East Antarctica (Thiele, 1912, as Archidoris nivalis).
Remarks: This species is considered by WoRMS as nomen dubium.

Doris plumulata Couthouy in Gould, 1852.
Records: Orange Harbour, Cape Horn (Gould, 1852; Rochebrune & Mabille, 1889).
Remarks: This species is considered by WoRMS as nomen dubium.

Doris wellingtonensis Abraham, 1877.
Records: Eastern Tasmania, Australia (as Archidoris wellintonensis in Burn, 2006; Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018); South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).
Figure 5. Doris kerguelenensis: (AE): underwater images of the animal alive in its environment, specimens from King George Island; (F): a juvenile specimen from the Weddell Sea photographed in the laboratory on a sponge of the genus Rosella. Original photographs by M. ballesteros. Scale bars are 10 mm.
Figure 5. Doris kerguelenensis: (AE): underwater images of the animal alive in its environment, specimens from King George Island; (F): a juvenile specimen from the Weddell Sea photographed in the laboratory on a sponge of the genus Rosella. Original photographs by M. ballesteros. Scale bars are 10 mm.
Diversity 17 00330 g005
Family Dendrodorididae O’Donoghue, 1924 (1864).
Genus Dendrodoris Ehrenberg, 1831.
Dendrodoris albopurpura Burn, 1957.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Dendrodoris arborescens (Collingwood, 1881).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Dendrodoris citrina (Cheeseman, 1881).
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Dendrodoris maugeana Burn, 1962.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Dendrodoris nigra (W. Stimpson, 1855).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Genus Doriopsilla Bergh, 1880.
Doriopsilla carneola (Angas, 1864).
Records: Northern and eastern Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Doriopsilla miniata (Alder & Hancock, 1864).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Doriopsilla peculiaris (Abraham, 1877).
Records: Northern and eastern Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Family Discodorididae Bergh, 1891.
Genus Alloiodoris Bergh, 1904.
Alloiodoris lanuginata (Abraham, 1877).
Records: South Island and Chatham Islands, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Alloiodoris marmorata Bergh, 1904.
Records: Northern Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Genus Atagema Gray, 1850.
Atagema albata (Burn, 1962)
Records: Northern Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018, as Trippa albata).
Remarks: WoRMS lists this species as taxon inquirendum, and Innabi et al. (2023) [218] indicate that without molecular data it cannot be confirmed whether A. albata is synonymous with A. papillosa (Risbec, 1928).

Atagema carinata (Quoy & Gaimaard, 1832).
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Genus Diaulula Bergh, 1878.
Diaulula hispida (A. d’Orbigny, 1836).
Records: Patagonia (Linse, 1999; Argentina, Forcelli, 2000; Chile, Linse, 1999; Schrödl, 2000b [219]; Schrödl, 2003); Orange Bay, Cape Horn (Rochebrune and Mabille, 1889, as Doris hispida A. d’Orbigny, 1836); Strait of Magellan (Powell, 1960, as Trippa hispida (A. d’Orbigny, 1836).

Diaulula punctuolata (A. d’Orbigny, 1836).
Records: Patagonia (Powell, 1960, as Doris vestita Abraham, 1877; Linse, 1999, as Anisodoris punctuolata (A. d’Orbigny, 1836) and Diaulula vestita (Abraham, 1877); Argentina, Forcelli, 2000, as A. punctuolata; Chile, Osorio & Reid, 2004 [220]; Linse, 1999, as A. punctuolata; Valdés & Muniain, 2002; Schrödl, 2003; Schrödl & Grau, 2006; Aldea et al., 2011 [203]); Falkland Is. (Eliot, 1907b, as Doris vestita Abraham 1877; Linse, 1999, as D. vestita).

Diaulula variolata (A. d’Orbigny, 1836).
Records: Patagonia (Chile; Aldea et al., 2011 [203]).
Remarks: This species is distributed from Arica (N of Chile) to the Bernardo O’Higgins National Park (51 °S), which is the current limit of its southernmost distribution.

Genus Gargamella Bergh, 1894.
Gargamella immaculata Bergh, 1894.
Records: Patagonia (Powell, 1960; Linse, 1999; Argentina, Forcelli, 2000; Chile, Linse, 1999; Schrödl, 2003); Burdwood Bank (Linse, 1999).

Genus Geitodoris Bergh, 1891.
Geitodoris patagonica Odhner, 1916.
Records: Patagonia (Linse, 1999; Argentina, Forcelli, 2000; Chile, Schrödl, 2000b; Schrödl, 2003); Falkland Is. (Powell, 1960, as G. falklandica Odhner, 1926; Linse, 1999; Schrödl, 2000b; Schrödl, 2003).

Genus Carminodoris Bergh, 1889.
Carminodoris nodulosa (Angas, 1864).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018; as Hoplodoris nodulosa).

Genus Jorunna Bergh, 1876.
Jorunna hartleyi (Burn, 1958).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Genus Paradoris Bergh, 1884.
Paradoris dubia (Bergh, 1904).
Records: Northern and eastern Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Genus Rostanga Bergh, 1879.
Rostanga calumus Rudman & Avern, 1989.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Rostanga crawfordi (Burn, 1969).
Records: Northern Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Rostanga pulchra MacFarland, 1905.
Records: Patagonia (Argentina, Forcelli, 2000; Chile, Linse, 1999; Schrödl, 2003; Schrödl & Grau, 2006).

Genus Sclerodoris Eliot, 1904.
Sclerodoris tarka Burn, 1969.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Genus Thordisa Bergh, 1877.
Thordisa verrucosa (Crosse in Angas, 1864).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).
Family Cadlinidae Bergh, 1891.

Genus Cadlina Bergh, 1879.
Cadlina affinis Odhner, 1934.
Records: Ross Sea (Odhner, 1934; Schrödl, 2000a).

Cadlina georgiensis Schrödl, 2000.
Records: South Georgia (Schrödl, 2000a, 2003).

Cadlina kerguelensis, Thiele, 1912.
Records: Kerguelen Is. (Thiele, 1912; Schrödl, 2000a).

Cadlina magellanica Odhner, 1926.
Records: Patagonia (Schrödl, 2003); Falkland Is. (Odhner, 1926, as C. falklandica; Schrödl, 2003).

Cadlina sparsa (Odhner, 1922).
Records: Patagonia (Linse, 1999; Argentina, Forcelli, 2000; Chile, Schrödl, 2003; Schrödl et al., 2005).

Cadlina tasmanica Rudman, 1990.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018); South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Cadlina willani M. C. Miller, 1980.
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Superfamily Chromodoridoidea Bergh, 1891.
Family Actinocyclidae O’Donoghue, 1929.
Genus Hallaxa Eliot, 1909.
Hallaxa gilva M. C. Miller, 1987.
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Hallaxa michaeli Gosliner & S. Johnson, 1994.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Genus Ceratosoma Gray, 1850.
Ceratosoma amoenum (Cheeseman, 1886).
Records: Northern Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Ceratosoma brevicaudatum Abraham, 1876.
Records: Northern and eastern Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Genus Chromodoris Alder & Hancock, 1855.
Chromodoris alternata (Burn, 1957).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Chromodoris ambigua Rudman, 1987.
Records: Northern Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Genus Diversidoris Rudman, 1987.
Diversidoris sulphurea (Rudman, 1986).
Records: Northern Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Genus Doriprismatica A d’Orbigny, 1839.
Doriprismatica kulonba (Burn, 1966).
Records: Northern Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Genus Goniobranchus Pease, 1866.
Goniobranchus annulatus (Eliot, 1904).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Goniobranchus aureomarginatus (Cheeseman, 1881).
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2009).

Goniobranchus epicurius (Basedow & Hedley, 1905).
Records: Northern and eastern Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Goniobranchus multimaculosus (Rudman, 1987).
Records: Northern Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Goniobranchus tasmaniensis (Bergh, 1905).
Records: Northern and eastern Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018; as Chromodoris tasmaniensis).

Goniobranchus cf. tinctorius (Rüppell & Leuckart, 1830).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Maynard, 2014 [221]; Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018; as Goniobranchus tinctorius).

Genus Mexichromis Bertsch, 1977.
Mexichromis macropus Rudman, 1983.
Records: Northern Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).
Genus Thorunna Bergh, 1878.
Thorunna arbuta (Burn, 1961).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Thorunna perplexa (Burn, 1957).
Records: Northern and eastern Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Genus Tyrinna Bergh, 1898.
Tyrinna delicata (Abraham, 1877).
Records: Patagonia (Forcelli, 2000; Chile, Linse, 1999; Schrödl, 2003; Schrödl et al. 2005; Aldea et al., 2011 [203]).
Remarks: Records from Patagonia as T. nobilis Bergh, 1898.

Genus Verconia Pruvot-Fol, 1931.
Verconia aureopunctata (Rudman, 1987).
Records: Northern Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Verconia closeorum (Rudman, 1986).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018; as Noumea closeorum).

Verconia haliclona (Burn, 1957).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Verconia verconis (Basedow & Hedley, 1905).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Infraorder Bathydoridoidei.
Superfamily Bathydoridoidea Bergh, 1891.
Family Bathydorididae Bergh, 1891.
Genus Bathydoris Bergh, 1884.
Bathydoris hodgsoni, Eliot, 1907 (Figure 6A).
Records: South Shetland Is. (Troncoso et al., 1999; Arnaud et al., 2001); Weddell Sea (Powell, 1960, as Bathydoris browni T. J. Evans, 1914; Avila et al., 2000 [222]; Rauschert & Arntz, 2015); Ross Sea (Eliot, 1907a, as B. hogdsoni and B. inflata Eliot, 1907; Hedley, 1916; Wägele, 1987; Brueggeman et al., 1999; Ghiglione et al., 2017); Davis Sea, East Antarctica (Hedley, 1916).
Remarks: B. hodgsoni is a large nudibranch, reaching a size of more than 15 cm in length. This species, with direct development, deposits the largest egg capsules known for a mollusk, of about 50 mm; it has an extremely long embryonic development of about 10 years, with the juveniles of the capsule hatching with a size of 29 mm (Moles et al., 2017b). Ballesteros (2024) has graphically represented the different stages of the life cycle of this species.

Genus Prodoris Baranetz & Minichev, 1995.
Prodoris clavigera (Thiele, 1912) (Figure 6B).
Records: Falkland Is. (Kaiser, 1980, as Bathydoris argentina Kaiser, 1987) [223]; South Georgia Is. (Wägele, 1987; Troncoso et al. 1997; Zelaya, 2005); South Orkney Is. (Wägaele, 1987; Troncoso et al., 1997); Weddell Sea (Wägele, 1987); Antarctic Peninsula (Wägele, 1987); South Shetland Is. (this work); West Antarctica (Rauschert & Arntz, 2015); Ross Sea (Odhner, 1934, as Bathydoris obliquata Odhner, 1934; Schiaparelli et al., 2006; Ghiglione et al., 2017); Davis Sea, East Antarctica (Thiele, 1912; Minichev, 1972, as Bathydoris obliquata Odhner, 1934).
Remarks: Most records as Bathydoris clavigera.

  Suborder Cladobranchia Willan et Morton, 1984.
  (Unassigned) Superfamily.
  Family Embletoniidae Pruvot-Fol, 1954.
  Genus Embletonia Alder & Hancock, 1851.
  Embletonia gracilis Risbec, 1928.
  Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

  Superfamily Arminoidea Iredale & O’Donoghue, 1923 (1841).
  Family Arminidae Iredale & O’Donoghue, 1923 (1841).
  Genus Armina Rafinesque, 1814.
  Armina cygnaea (Bergh, 1876).
  Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

  Armina rubida (A. Gould, 1852).
  Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).
  Remarks: This species has been recorded as belonging to the genus Diphyllidia in the original description and later as Dermatobranchus rubidus.
Figure 6. (A): Bathydoris hogdsoni, specimen from the Weddell Sea; (B): Prodoris clavigera, specimen from the South Shetland Islands. Original photographs by M. Ballesteros. Scale bars are 10 mm.
Figure 6. (A): Bathydoris hogdsoni, specimen from the Weddell Sea; (B): Prodoris clavigera, specimen from the South Shetland Islands. Original photographs by M. Ballesteros. Scale bars are 10 mm.
Diversity 17 00330 g006
Family Heterodorididae A. E. Verrill & Emerton, 1882.
Genus Heterodoris A. E. Verrill & Emerton, 1882.
Heterodoris antipodes Willan, 1981.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018); South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Superfamily Proctonotoidea Gray, 1853.
Family Madrellidae Preston, 1911.
Genus Madrella Alder & Hancock, 1864.
Madrella cf. sanguinea (Angas, 1864).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015, as Madrella sp. RB1; Grove, 2018, as Madrella sanguinea).
Remarks: This scarlet-red Madrella is often confused with the tropical Madrella ferruginosa Alder & Hancock, 1864, which exhibits swimming larvae, whereas this cool–temperate species exhibits direct development and crawling juveniles.

Family Proctonotidae Gray, 1853.
Genus Caldukia Burn & M. C. Miller, 1969.
Caldukia affinis (Burn, 1958).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Caldukia albolineata M. C. Miller, 1970.
Records: South Island, and Subantarctic islands of New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Family Janolidae Pruvot-Fol, 1933.
Genus Galeojanolus M. C. Miller, 1971.
Galeojanolus ionnae M. C. Miller, 1971.
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Genus Janolus Bergh, 1884.
Janolus ignis M. C. Miller & Willan, 1986.
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Genus Antiopella Hoyle, 1902.
Antiopella novozealandica Eliot, 1907.
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Family Curnonidae d’Udekem d’Acoz, 2017.
Genus Curnon d’Udekem d’Acoz, 2017.
Curnon granulosa (Vayssière, 1906) (Figure 7A).
Records: South Orkney Islands (Wägele et al. 1995; Barnes & Bullough, 1996); Weddell Sea (Rauschert & Arntz, 2015); Wandel Island, Antarctic Peninsula (Vayssière, 1906a; Powell, 1960); South Shetland Is. (Troncoso et al., 1999; Arnaud et al., 2001); King George Is. (present work, a 13 mm long specimen collected by scuba diving on the Himantothalus grandifolius (A. Gepp & E. S. Gepp) Zinova, 1959 algae at a depth of 10 m during the Spanish BENTART 2006 expedition; Schrödl et al., 2016); Wandel Is., Antarctic Peninsula (Vayssiére, 1906).
Remarks: In all previous records, recorded as Charcotia granulosa Vayssière, 1906a. The Curnonidae was known until 2017 as the Charcotidae, and Charcotia granulosa was transferred to the new genus Curnon d’Udekem d’Acoz, 2017.

Genus Pseudotritonia Thiele, 1912.
Pseudotritonia antarctica (Odhner, 1934).
Records: Antarctic Peninsula (Australian Antarctic Data Centre, 2024, as Telarma antarctica); Ross Sea (Odhner, 1934, as Telarma antarctica); Adelie Land (Vicente & Arnaud, 1974, as Telarma antarctica).
Remarks: This species, originally described as Telarma antarctica, was included until 2017 within the Charcotidae; since then, considered synonymous with the Curnonidae.

Pseudotritonia gracilidens Odhner, 1944.
Records: South Orkney Islands (Barnes & Bullough, 1996); Weddell Sea (Rauschert & Arntz, 2015, as cf.); King George Is. (Schrödl et al., 2016); Ross Sea (Odhner, 1934; Cattaneo-Vietti, 1991; Cattaneo-Vietti et al. 2000).
Remarks: See remarks for P. antarctica.

Pseudotritonia quadrangularis Thiele, 1912 (Figure 7B).
Records: Antarctic Peninsula, South Shetlands Is. and South Orkneys Is. (Rudman, 2007) [224]; Davis Sea, East Antarctica (Thiele, 1912).
Remarks: See remarks of P. antarctica.

Superfamily Dendronotoidea Allman, 1845.
Family Scyllaeidae Alder & Hancock, 1855.
Genus Scyllaea Linnaeus, 1758.
Scyllaea fulva Quoy & Gaimard, 1824.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).
Remarks: Pola et al. (2012) [225] studied the Scyllaeidae and found significant differences (7%) between specimens of Scyllaea pelagica Linnaeus, 1758, from the Atlantic and the Indo-Pacific and suggested that this cosmopolitan species is probably two different species. Consequently, this name should refer only to specimens from the Atlantic, while those from the Indo-Pacific would belong to Scyllaea fulva Quoy & Gaimard, 1824, an opinion also shared by Burn (2015).
Figure 7. (A): Curnon granulosa, specimen from King George Island; (B): Pseudotritonia quadrangularis, specimen from the Antarctic Peninsula, photo M. Rauschert; (CE): Myrella challengeriana, specimens from south Shetland (D,E) and the Weddell Sea (C); (F): Myrella dantarti, specimen from Bouvet Island. Photographs (A,CF) by M. Ballesteros. Scale bars are 10 mm.
Figure 7. (A): Curnon granulosa, specimen from King George Island; (B): Pseudotritonia quadrangularis, specimen from the Antarctic Peninsula, photo M. Rauschert; (CE): Myrella challengeriana, specimens from south Shetland (D,E) and the Weddell Sea (C); (F): Myrella dantarti, specimen from Bouvet Island. Photographs (A,CF) by M. Ballesteros. Scale bars are 10 mm.
Diversity 17 00330 g007
Family Tethydidae Rafinesque, 1815.
Genus Melibe Rang, 1829.
Melibe australis (Angas, 1864).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Melibe maugeana Burn, 1960.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Family Dotidae Gray, 1853.
Genus Doto Oken 1815.
Doto antarctica Eliot, 1907 (Figure 8A,B).
Records: Bouvet Island (Arntz et al. 2006, as Doto sp. [226]; Moles et al., 2016a); Weddell Sea (Rauschert & Arntz, 2015; Moles et al., 2016a; present work); Ross Sea (Eliot, 1907a; Odhner, 1934; Brueggeman et al. 1999; Schiaparelli et al., 2006; Ghiglione et al., 2013).

Doto cf. bella Baba, 1938.
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Doto carinova Moles, C. Àvila & Wägele, 2016 (Figure 8C,D).
Records: Eastern Weddell Sea (Moles et al., 2016a; present work).
Remarks: The only specimen known so far was collected during the ANTXXI/2 campaign of the R.V. Polarstern by means of an Agassiz dredge on a bottom located at a depth of 277 m above the gorgonian Primnoisis antarctica (Studer, 1878), on which it was also spawning (Moles et al., 2016a).

Doto ostenta Burn, 1958.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Doto pita Er. Marcus, 1955.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018); South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Doto uva Er. Marcus, 1955.
Records: Patagonia (Argentina, Forcelli, 2000; Chile, Linse, 1999; Schrödl, 2003, Schrödl et al., 2005).

Superfamily Tritonioidea Lamarck, 1809.
Family Tritoniidae Lamarck, 1809.
Genus Marionia Vayssière, 1877.
Marionia cucullata (Couthouy, 1852).
Records: Patagonia (Argentina, Forcelli, 2000; Chile, Schrödl, 2003); Adelie Land, East Antarctica (Vicente & Arnaud, 1974).

Marionia platyctenea (Willan, 1988).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018, as Marioniopsis platyctenea).
Remarks: Obligate associate of the encrusting octocoral Erythropodium hicksoni (Utinomi, 1971) (Burn, 2015).
Figure 8. Doto antarctica: (A): specimen from the Weddell Sea with some cerata; (B): detail of a cerata with granular tubercles. (C,D): Doto carinova from the Weddell Sea, in D on the gorgonian Primnoisis antarctica, which is its substrate, the arrow indicates the spawn. Original photographs by M. Ballesteros. Scale bars are 10 mm.
Figure 8. Doto antarctica: (A): specimen from the Weddell Sea with some cerata; (B): detail of a cerata with granular tubercles. (C,D): Doto carinova from the Weddell Sea, in D on the gorgonian Primnoisis antarctica, which is its substrate, the arrow indicates the spawn. Original photographs by M. Ballesteros. Scale bars are 10 mm.
Diversity 17 00330 g008
Genus Myrella Odhner, 1963.
Myrella challengeriana (Bergh, 1884) (Figure 7C–E).
Records: Punta Arenas, Orange Harbour (Rochebrune & Mabille, 1889, as Microlophus poirieri Mabille & Rochebrune, 1889); Patagonia (Bergh, 1884; Argentina, Linse, 1999, as Tritonia australis (Bergh, 1898); Forcelli, 2000; Chile, Reid & Osorio, 2000 [227]; Linse, 1999, as Tritonia australis (Bergh, 1898); Schrödl, 2003, Schrödl et al., 2005, Aldea et al., 2011 [203]); Falkland Is. (Eliot, 1907b; Linse, 1999; Schrödl, 2003); South Georgia Is. (Powell, 1951, as Tritonia antarctica Pfeffer, 1886; Troncoso et al., 1997; Linse, 1999; Zelaya, 2005); South Orkney Is. (Eliot, 1909, as Tritonia appendiculata Eliot, 1905; Barnes & Bullough, 1996, as Tritonia antarctica Pfeffer, 1886; Wägele, 1995, as Tritonia antarctica Pfeffer, 1886 [228]; Troncoso et al., 1997, as Tritonia antarctica Pfeffer, 1886; Linse, 1999); Bouvet Island (Arntz et al., 2006; Ballesteros & Avila, 2006); South Shetland Is. (Troncoso et al., 1999; Linse, 1999; Arnaud et al., 2001, as Tritonia antarctica Pfeffer, 1886; present work); Weddell Sea (Wägele, 1995; Linse, 1999; Rauschert & Arntz, 2015; present work); Antarctic Peninsula (Wägele, 1995); Bellingshausen Sea (Aldea et al., 2008, as Tritonia antarctica Pfeffer, 1886); Peter I Is. (Aldea et al., 2009); Ross Sea (Eliot, 1907a; Brueggeman et al. 1999; Linse, 1999; Schiaparelli et al., 2006); Adélie Land (Linse, 1999); Davis Sea, East Antarctica (Minichev, 1972).
Remarks: Until the recent work of De Vasconcelos et al. (2023) [229], records of this species referred to the genus Tritonia, but these authors, through anatomical and molecular studies, reinstated the genus Myrella to include Tritonia species from Antarctic and Subantarctic areas. Schrödl (2003) remarked that Tritonia australis (Bergh, 1898) and T. poirieri (Mabille & Rochebrune, 1889) can be synonymous species of M. challengeriana, an opinion that we follow here. This species is one of the most abundant and most widely distributed of the marine heterobranch species of the Southern Ocean.

Myrella dantarti (Ballesteros & C. Àvila, 2006) (Figure 7F).
Records: Bouvet Island (Arntz et al., 2006, as Tritonia sp.; Ballesteros & Avila, 2006; Rauschert & Arntz, 2015, as Tritoniidae gen. sp.; present work).
Remarks: Since its description in 2006, this spectacular species has not been recorded again outside its original area, the island of Bouvet.

Myrella vorax (Odhner, 1926).
Records: Patagonia (Powell, 1960; Linse, 1999; Argentina, Forcelli, 2000; Chile, Odhner, 1926; Schrödl, 2003); Burdwood Bank (Linse, 1999); South Georgia (Wägele, 1995; Linse, 1999; Zelaya, 2005).
Remarks: In all cases, recorded as Tritonia vorax.

Genus Tritonia Cuvier, 1798.
Tritonia odhneri Er. Marcus, 1959.
Records: Patagonia (Argentina, Forcelli, 2000; Chile, Linse, 1999; Schrödl, 2003).

Genus Tritoniella Eliot, 1907.
Tritoniella belli Eliot, 1907 (Figure 9A–C).
Records: Falkland Islands (Powell, 1960); South Orkney Islands (Barnes & Bullough, 1996; Troncoso et al., 1997); South Georgia (Powell, 1960; Wägele, 1989); Kergueen Is. (Wägele, 1989); Weddell Sea (Rauschert & Arntz, 2015; Schächinger et al., 2022; present work); western Antarctic Peninsula (Aldea et al., 2009); South Shetlands Is. (Troncoso et al., 1999; Arnaud et al., 2001); King George Is. (Schrödl et al., 2016); Bellingshausen Sea (Aldea et al., 2008); Ross Sea (Eliot, 1907a, as T. belli and T. sinuata Eliot, 1907; Hedley, 1916, as T. sinuata Eliot, 1907; Odhner, 1934, as T. sinuata Eliot, 1907; Powell, 1960; Cattaneo-Vietti, 1991; Brueggeman et al., 1999; Cattaneo-Vietti et al., 2000; Schiaparelli & Linse, 2014; Ghiglione et al., 2017; Schächinger et al., 2022); Adelie Land (Vicente & Arnaud, 1974, as T. sinuata); Tokarev Is., East Antarctica (Minichev, 1972); Enderby Land (Wägele, 1989); MacRobertson Is., East Antarctica (Wägele, 1989).
Remarks: Tritoniella sinuata Eliot, 1907 is considered synonymous with T. belli by Wägele (1989), while, recently, Schächinger et al. (2022) indicated that it would be necessary to study more material from the sinuata morph to clarify its status. These last authors have studied a significant number of Tritoniella specimens from various locations in the Scotia Arc and the South Shetlands, collected by scuba diving or at great depths using dredgers, and through molecular analysis have discovered the existence of five new species. These taxa are morphologically similar to T. belli. Some of the records of T. belli indicated above may belong to one of these new species.
Tritoniella gnathodentata Schächinger, Schrödl, N. G. Wilson & Moles, 2022.
Records: Shag Rocks and South Georgia (Schächinger et al., 2022).
Remarks: This species can reach a size of 38 mm in length and has been caught at depths of up to 751 m.

Tritoniella gnocchi Schächinger, Schrödl, N. G. Wilson & Moles, 2022.
Records: Burdwood Bank, South to Falkland Is. (Schächinger et al., 2022).
Remarks: Only the 21 mm length specimen used to describe the species is known, captured between 561 and 572 m deep.

Tritoniella heideae Schächinger, Schrödl, N. G. Wilson & Moles, 2022.
Records: Ardley Is., King George Is., South Shetland Archipelago and Montagu Is., South Sandwich Is. (Schächinger et al., 2022).
Remarks: Specimens of this species can reach up to 53 mm in length.

Tritoniella prinzess Schächinger, Schrödl, N. G. Wilson & Moles, 2022.
Records: Ardley Is., King George Is., South Shetland Archipelago (Schächinger et al., 2022).
Remarks: Only one specimen measuring 17 mm in length is known, which was used to describe the species and was collected between 20 and 40 m deep.

Tritoniella schroriesi Schächinger, Schrödl, N. G. Wilson & Moles, 2022 Figure 9D–F).
Records: Ardley Is., South Shetland Archipelago, Coronation Is., South Orkney Is. (Schächinger et al., 2022); Albatros Is., Fildes Bay, King George Is., South Shetland Archipelago (this work).
Remarks: Only three specimens are known, the two used to describe the species and the specimen collected by the authors on Albatros Island. This species can reach a size of 54 mm in length.

Superfamily Aeolidioidea Gray, 1827.
Family Aeolidiidae Gray, 1827.
Genus Aeolidia Cuvier, 1798.
Aeolidia campbelli (Cunningham, 1871).
Records: Patagonia (Powell, 1960; Linse, 1999; Chile, Kiekenberger et al., 2016 [230]); Falkland Is. (Eliot, 1907b, as A. serotina Bergh, 1873; Powell, 1951, as A. serotina; Linse, 1999; Schrödl, 2003; Kienberger et al., 2016 [230]).
Remarks: This species has been recorded by different authors as Aeolidia papillosa Linnaeus, 1761. Kienberger et al. (2016) [230] has shown that A. papillosa is a cryptic species complex and that the records of A. papillosa from South America belong to a different species, A. campbelli (Cunningham, 1871), a senior synonym of A. serotina Bergh, 1873.

Genus Aeolidiella Bergh, 1867.
Aeolidiella drusilla Bergh, 1900.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Genus Baeolidia Bergh, 1888.
Baeolidia australis (Rudman, 1982).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Baeolidia macleayi (Angas, 1864).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Genus Berghia Trinchese, 1877.
Berghia rissodominguezi Muniain & Ortea, 1999.
Records: Patagonia (Argentina, Muniain & Ortea, 1999).
Figure 9. Tritoniella belli, specimen from the Weddell Sea: (A): dorsal view; (B): ventral view; (C): detail of the head and rhinophores; Tritoniella schroriesi from King George Island. (D,E): Animal in its natural environment. (F): Detail of the anterior area with the frontal veil and the rhinophores. Original photos by M. Ballesteros. Scale bars are 10 mm.
Figure 9. Tritoniella belli, specimen from the Weddell Sea: (A): dorsal view; (B): ventral view; (C): detail of the head and rhinophores; Tritoniella schroriesi from King George Island. (D,E): Animal in its natural environment. (F): Detail of the anterior area with the frontal veil and the rhinophores. Original photos by M. Ballesteros. Scale bars are 10 mm.
Diversity 17 00330 g009
Genus Cerberilla Bergh, 1873.
Cerberilla incola Burn, 1974.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Genus Spurilla Bergh, 1864.
Spurilla braziliana MacFarland, 1909.
Records: Patagonia (Forcelli, 2000, as S. neapolitana Delle Chiaje, 1841).
Remarks: Forcelli (2000) does not indicate the place of observation of S. neapolitana, rendering it uncertain, and claims that the specimens attributed to it on the Argentine coasts may belong to another species or even to another genus, an idea supported by other authors (Schrödl, 2003). Carmona et al. (2014) [231], in their work on the Spurilla neapolitana species complex, confirm with molecular data that the specimens attributed to S. neapolitana in the western Atlantic are actually S. braziliana and that this species isalso found living in the eastern Pacific.

Family Facelinidae Bergh, 1889.
Genus Austraeolis Burn, 1962.
Austraeolis ornata (Angas, 1864).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Genus Burnaia M. C. Miller, 2001.
Burnaia helicochorda (M. C. Miller, 1988).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Genus Facelina Alder & Hancock, 1855.
Facelina hartleyi Burn, 1962.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Facelina newcombi (Angas, 1864).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Genus Jason M. C. Miller, 1974.
Jason mirabilis Miller, 1974.
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Genus Phidiana Gray, 1850.
Phidiana lottini (Lesson, 1831).
Records: Patagonia (Argentina, Forcelli, 2000; Chile, Linse, 1999; Schrödl, 2003, Schrödl et al., 2005).

Phidiana milleri Rudman, 1980.
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Phidiana patagonica (A. d’Orbigny, 1836).
Records: Patagonia (d’Orbigny, 1835–1846; Rochebrune & Mabille, 1889; Linse, 1999).
Remarks: According to Schrödl (2003), the specimens illustrated by Forcelli (2000, pp. 130) are not Ph. patagonica but rather Flabellina falklandica (Eliot, 1907).

Family Flabellinidae Bergh, 1889.
Genus Coryphellina O’Donoghue, 1929.
Coryphellina albomarginata (M. C. Miller, 1971).
Records: South Island, New Zealand (as Flabellina albomarginata) (Spencer et al., 2016).

Coryphellina rubrolineata O’Donoghue, 1929.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (as Flabellina rubrolineata) (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018; Maynard, 2014).

Coryphellina poenicia (Burn, 1957).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018; as Flabellina poenicia).

Genus Flabellina Gray, 1833.
Flabellina falklandica (Eliot, 1907).
Records: Patagonia (Linse, 1999; Argentina; Forcelli, 2000; Chile; Reid & Osorio, 2000 [227]; Schrödl, 2003; Aldea et al., 2011); Falkland Is. (Eliot, 1907b, as Coryphella falklandica; Linse, 1999; Schrödl, 2003); South Georgia Is. (Powell, 1960; Schrödl, 2003; Zelaya, 2005); Shag Rocks (Linse, 1999); Crozet Is. (Odhner, 1926; Linse, 1999).

Family Notaeolidiidae Eliot, 1910.
Genus Notaeolidia Eliot, 1095.
Notaeolidia depressa Eliot, 1905 (Figure 10D).
Records: Bouvet Island (Arntz et al., 2006); Weddell Sea (Wägele, 1990a; Rauschert & Arntz, 2015; present work); Antarctic Peninsula (Wägele, 1990a); Ross Sea (Eliot,1907a; Hedley, 1916; Odhner, 1934, as N. robsoni Odhner, 1934; Brueggeman et al., 1999); Davis Sea, East Antarctica (Thiele, 1912, as Notaeolidia rufopicta Thiele, 1912; Minichev, 1972, as Notaeolidia alutacea Minichev, 1972, and Notaeolidia flava Minichev, 1972); Adelie Land, East Antarctica (Vicente & Arnaud, 1974, as N. robsoni Odhner, 1934).
Remarks: Wägele (1990a) performs an excellent and complete morphological and anatomical redescription of the species and synonymizes other described species of Notaeolidia (N. rufopicta; N robsoni; N. subgigas Odhner, 1944; N. alutacea; and N. flava) with N. depressa.

Notaeolidia gigas Eliot, 1905 (Figure 10E).
Records: Wandel Is., Antarctic Peninsula (Vayssiére, 1906); South Sandwich Is. (Powell, 1951); South Orkney Islands (Eliot, 1905, as Notaeolidia purpurea Eliot, 1905; Barnes & Bullough, 1996); South Shetland Is. (Troncoso et al., 1999; present work); King George Is. (Wägele, 1990a; Troncoso et al., 1996; Schrödl et al., 2016); Weddell Sea (Eliot,1905); Ross Sea (Brueggeman et al., 1999).
Remarks: This species can reach 124 mm in length (personal observation).

Notaeolidia schmekelae Wägele, 1990.
Records: Weddell Sea (Wägele, 1990a); Ross Sea (Brueggeman et al., 1999, as probably).
Remarks: This species can reach 135 mm in length (Wägele, 1990a).

Family Myrrhinidae Bergh, 1905.
Genus Phyllodesmium Ehrenberg, 1831.
Phyllodesmium macphersonae (Burn, 1962).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Phyllodesmium serratum (Baba, 1949).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Family Glaucidae Gray, 1827.
Genus Glaucilla Bergh, 1861.
Glaucilla bennettae (Churchill, Á. Valdés & Ó Foighil, 2014).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018, as Glaucus bennettae Churchill et al., 2014 [232]; northern Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015, as Glaucus marginatus (Reinhardt & Bergh, 1864)).
Remarks: This pelagic species is frequently observed in beach wrack after storms (Burn, 2015). Churchill et al. (2014) [232] studied the anatomy and molecular structure of the “marginatus” morphospecies complex and concluded that only Glaucus atlanticus and the new species Glaucilla bennettae (described as Glaucus bennettae) are found in the South Pacific gyre, while Glaucilla marginata is limited to the North Pacific and Indian Oceans.

Genus Glaucus Forster, 1777.
Glaucus atlanticus Forster, 1777.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).
Remarks: This pelagic species is frequently observed in beach wrack after storms (Burn, 2015). It has a wide geographical distribution in tropical and subtropical waters of the Atlantic, Pacific and Indian Oceans. The pain caused by its “sting” is well known, as are the side effects that it causes due to its diet based on siphonophores, such as the Portuguese man-of-war Physalia physalis (Linnaeus, 1758), and pelagic chondrophore hydroids, such as Velella velella (Linnaeus, 1758) and Porpita porpita (Linnaeus, 1758), all of which have stings, especially Ph. physalis, which the nudibranch itself incorporates and which it can use for its own defense or attack.

Superfamily Fionoidea Gray, 1857.
Family Fionidae Gray, 1857.
Genus Fiona Alder & Hancock [in Forbes & Hanley], 1853.
Fiona pinnata (Eschscholtz, 1831).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018); South Island and Chatham Islands, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Family Apataidae Korshunova, Martynov, Bakken, Evertsen, Fletcher,
Mudianta, Saito, Lundin, Schrödl & Picton, 2017.
Genus Tularia Burn, 1966.
Tularia bractea (Burn, 1962).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Family Eubranchidae Odhner, 1934.
Genus Eubranchus Forbes, 1838.
Eubranchus adarensis Odhner, 1934.
Records: Adare Cape, Ross Sea (Odhner, 1934); Adelie Land (Vicente & Arnaud, 1974).

Eubranchus agrius Er. Marcus, 1959.
Records: New Zealand (Powell, 1979); Patagonia (Linse, 1999; Forcelli, 2000).
Remarks: Forcelli (2000) indicates that it is very uncommon in the Magellanic Province.

Eubranchus arnaudi Vicente, 1973.
Records: Kerguelen Is. (Vicente, 1973).
Remarks: After its description, this species has not been recorded again.

Eubranchus falklandicus (Eliot, 1907).
Records: Falkland Is. (Eliot, 1907b, as Galvina falklandica Eliot, 1907; Powell, 1951).

Eubranchus fuegiensis Odhner, 1926.
Records: Patagonia (Odhner, 1926; Linse, 1999; Schrödl, 2003).

Eubranchus glacialis (Thiele, 1912) (Figure 10C).
Records: South Shetland Is. (present work, one animal, 9 mm in length, collected during the Bentart 2006 expedition); Ross Sea (Valdés et al., 2012); Davis Sea (Thiele, 1912, as Galvinella glacialis).
Remarks: E. glacialis is a very poorly known species that has been reported as distant as the Davis Sea (East Antarctica), the Ross Sea and the South Shetlands (West Antarctica). A specimen captured in the South Shetlands considerably widened the distribution of the species in Antarctic waters.

Eubranchus rubeolus Burn, 1964.
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Burn, 2015; Spencer et al., 2016).

Genus Galvinella Eliot, 1907.
Galvinella antarctica Eliot, 1907.
Records: Kapp Norvegia, Eastern Weddell Sea (SOMBASE, 2024, as Amphorina antarctica) [233]; Ross Sea (Eliot, 1907a).
Remarks: This species is only known from the 20 mm animal of the original description in 1907 and from the SOMBASE record from 1996. WoRMS considered it as taxon inquirendum.

Family Cuthonidae Odhner, 1934.
Genus Cuthona Alder & Hancock, 1855.
Cuthona antarctica (Pfeffer, 1886).
Records: South Georgia Is. (Martens & Pfeffer, 1886, as Aeolis antarctica).
Remarks: This species has not been recorded again after its original description.

Cuthona claviformis Vicente, 1973.
Records: Adelia Land, East Antarctica (Vicente & Arnaud, 1974).
Remarks: This species has not been recorded again after its original description.

Cuthona crinita Minichev, 1972 (Figure 10A).
Records: Bouvet Island (Odhner, 1934, as Cuthona schraderi var. bouvetensis Odhner, 1944; Arntz et al. 2006, as Cuthona sp. [226]); Weddell Sea (present work, one animal, 9 mm long, collected at 228 m depth); Ross Sea (Valdés et al., 2012); Queen Mary Land, East Antarctica (Minichev, 1972).
Remarks: This species can measure up to 45 mm in length preserved (Minichev, 1972).

Cuthona georgiana (Pfeffer, 1886).
Records: Patagonia (Linse, 1999; Forcelli, 2000; Schrödl, 2003); South Georgia (Pfeffer in Martens & Pfeffer, 1886, as Aeolis georgiana; Powell, 1951); Kerguelen Is. (Thiele, 1912, as Cratena exigua Thiele, 1912; Linse, 1999; Powell, 1960, as Cratena exigua Thiele, 1912); Ross Sea (Cattaneo-Vietti, 1991; Linse, 1999; Cattaneo-Vietti et al. 2000; Schiaparelli & Linse, 2014); David Sea, East Antarctica (Minichev, 1972).
Remarks: Minichev (1972) described C. georgiana longipapillata from the Davis Sea, which up to now has not been recorded elsewhere for Antarctic waters.

Cuthona giarannae Á. Valdés, Moran & H. A. Woods, 2012.
Records: Ross Sea (Valdés et al., 2012).
Remarks: This species (preserved animals) can reach up to 8 mm in length (Valdés et al., 2012).

Cuthona odhneri Er. Marcus, 1959.
Records: Patagonia (Linse, 1999; Schrödl, 2003).

Cuthona paucicirra Minichev, 1972.
Records: Davis Sea, East Antarctica (Minichev, 1972).

Cuthona valentini (Eliot, 1907).
Records: Patagonia (Linse, 1999; Forcelli, 2000; Schrödl, 2003); Falkland Is. (Eliot, 1907b; Powell, 1951; Linse, 1999; Schrödl, 2003).
Remarks: This species has been recorded as Cratena valentini, Tergipes valentini or Catriona valentini. Schrödl (1999b) transferred the “valentini” species to the genus Cuthona due to the short radula and the angular tooth shape.

Family Cuthonellidae M. C. Miller, 1977.
Genus Cuthonella Bergh, 1884.
Cuthonella elioti (Odhner, 1944).
Records: Ross Sea (Eliot, 1907a as Cuthonella antartica Eliot, 1907; Valdés et al., 2012).
Remarks: For the nomenclature of this species, described by Eliot (1907a), see Valdés et al. (2012).

Cuthonella modesta Eliot, 1907 (Figure 10B).
Records: South Shetland Is. (present work, one animal of 12 mm, alive, collected during the Bentart 2006 expedition); Ross Sea (Eliot, 1907a; Valdés et al., 2012).
Family Murmaniidae Korshunova, Martynov, Bakken, Evertsen, Fletcher, Mudianta, Saito, Lundin, Schrödl & Picton, 2017.

Genus Guyvalvoria Vayssière, 1906.
Guyvalvoria francaisi Vayssière, 1906.
Records: Wandel Is., Antarctic Peninsula (Vayssiére, 1906a).
Remarks: This species has not been recorded after its description.

Guyvalvoria gruzovi Martynov, 2006.
Records: Amery Ice Shelf, Davis Sea (Martynov, 2006).
Remarks: This species has not been recorded after its description.

Guyvalvoria paradoxa (Eliot, 1907).
Records: South Georgia Is. (Pfeffer in Martens & Pfeffer, 1886, as Aeolis schraderi); Ross Sea (Eliot, 1907a, as Cuthonella paradoxa; Valdés et al., 2012).
Remarks: The species Cuthona schraderi (Pfeffer, 1886) is recorded in WoRMS as nomen dubium, and Valdés et al. (2012) stated that the description and redescription (Odhner, 1934) of C. schraderi display many similarities to specimens that they studied as Guyvalvoria paradoxa, an opinion that we follow here. The egg masses of this species are laid on the giant solitary hydroids Corymorpha microrhiza (Hickson & Gravely, 1907) or Zyzzyzus parvula (Hickson & Gravely, 1907) (Valdés et al., 2012), which are probably the food of the adults.

Guyvalvoria savinkini Martynov, 2006.
Records: Kerguelen Is. (Martynov, 2006).
Remarks: This species has not been recorded after its description.
Figure 10. (A): Cuthona crinita, specimen from the Weddell Sea. (B): Cuthonella modesta, specimen from South Shetland. (C): Eubranchus glacialis, specimen from South Shetland. (D): Two specimens of Notaeolidia depressa from the Weddell Sea. The brown hepatic branches that extend into the cerata are clearly visible. (E): Notaeolidia gigas from South Shetland. Original photos by M. Ballesteros. Scale bars are 10 mm.
Figure 10. (A): Cuthona crinita, specimen from the Weddell Sea. (B): Cuthonella modesta, specimen from South Shetland. (C): Eubranchus glacialis, specimen from South Shetland. (D): Two specimens of Notaeolidia depressa from the Weddell Sea. The brown hepatic branches that extend into the cerata are clearly visible. (E): Notaeolidia gigas from South Shetland. Original photos by M. Ballesteros. Scale bars are 10 mm.
Diversity 17 00330 g010
Family Tergipedidae Bergh, 1889.
Genus Tergipes Cuvier, 1805.
Tergipes antarcticus Pelseneer, 1903.
Records: Weddell Sea (Kiko et al., 2008); Charcot Island, Bellingshausen Sea, West Antarctica (Pelseneer, 1903) [234]; East Antarctica (Kiko et al., 2008).
Remarks: This unique nudibranch species develops all its vital phases in ice, adult, egg masses, larva and juveniles (Kiko et al., 2008).

Family Trinchesiidae F. Nordsieck, 1972.
Genus Trinchesia Ihering, 1879.
Trinchesia macquariensis Burn, 1973.
Records: Macquarie Is. (Burn, 1973).

Trinchesia reflexa (M. C. Miller, 1977).
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Trinchesia sororum Burn, 1964.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Trinchesia viridiana (Burn, 1962).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Trinchesia zelandica (Odhner, 1924).
Records: Subantarctic islands of New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Clade Tectipleura Schrödl et al., 2011.
Order Umbraculida.
Superfamily Umbraculoidea Dall, 1889 (1827).
Family Tylodinidae Rafinesque, 1814.
Genus Tylodina Rafinesque, 1814.
Tylodina corticalis (Tate, 1889).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn 2015; Grove, 2018).

Family Umbraculidae Dall, 1889 (1827).
Genus Umbraculum Schumacher, 1817.
Umbraculum umbraculum ([Lightfoot], 1786).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn 2015; Grove, 2018).
Remarks: This species has a long list of synonyms due to its wide geographical distribution on both shores of the Atlantic, the Indian Ocean, the Pacific and the Mediterranean. Due to this wide geographical distribution, some authors have suggested (Arias & Crocetta, 2016 [235]) that U. umbraculum could be a species complex. Molecular studies using individuals from multiple locations are necessary to clarify its taxonomic status.

Order Aplysiida.
Superfamily Aplysioidea Lamarck, 1809.
Family Aplysiidae Lamarck, 1809.
Genus Aplysia Linnaeus, 1767.
Aplysia argus Rüppell & Leuckart, 1830.
Records: Northern and eastern Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018; Nimbs et al., 2017).

Aplysia concava G. B. Sowerby I, 1833.
Records: Northern and eastern Tasmania, Australia (Burn 2015, as Aplysia parvula Mörch, 1863; Grove, 2018, as Aplysia parvula) (Nimbs, 2021 [236]; Nimbs & Wilson, 2021); South Island, New Zealand (Spencer, Willan, Marshall, & Murray, 2016).
Remarks: Until the review of the Aplysia parvula species complex by Golestani et al. (2019), Aplysia concava had been considered a morphotype of A. parvula.

Aplysia extraordinaria (J. K. Allan, 1932).
Records: Northern and eastern Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Nimbs et al., 2017; Grove, 2018).

Aplysia keraudreni Rang, 1828.
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Aplysia juliana Quoy & Gaimard, 1832.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Willan, 1998 [237]; Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018; Nimbs, et al., 2017); South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Aplysia sydneyensis G. B. Sowerby I, 1869.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018; Nimbs, et al., 2017).

Order Cephalaspidea P. Fischer, 1883.
{Family (unassigned)}.
Genus Noalda Iredale, 1936.
Noalda exigua (Hedley, 1912).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018; Burn 2015).
Superfamily Bulloidea Gray, 1827.

Family Bullidae Gray, 1827.
Genus Bulla Linnaeus, 1758.
Bulla quoyii J. E. Gray, 1843.
Records: Northern Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018); South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Family Retusidae Thiele, 1925.
Genus Relichna Rudman, 1971.
Relichna murdochi (Suter, 1913).
Records: Chatham Islands, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Relichna pachys (R. B. Watson, 1883).
Records: South Island and Chatham Islands, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Genus Retusa T. Brown, 1827.
Retusa amphizosta (R. B. Watson, 1886).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Retusa atkinsoni (Tenison Woods, 1876).
Records: Northern and eastern Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Retusa opima (H. J. Finlay, 1926).
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Retusa oruaensis (W. H. Webster, 1908).
Records: South Island and Chatham Islands, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Retusa pelyx Burn in Burn & Bell, 1974.
Records: Northern and eastern Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Retusa protumida (Hedley, 1903).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Retusa pygmaea (A. Adams, 1850).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Retusa sculpta (Gatliff & Gabriel, 1913).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2006).
Remarks: This species, of which very few specimens are known and which was initially described as a subspecies of Retusa pygmaea, is considered enigmatic by Burn (2006).

Retusa striata (F. W. Hutton, 1873).
Records: South Island and Chatham Islands, New Zealand; Subantarctic islands of New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Family Rhizoridae Dell, 1952.
Genus Volvulella R. B. Newton, 1891.
Volvulella nesentus (H. J. Finlay, 1926).
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Volvulella rostrata (A. Adams, 1850).
Records: Northern and eastern Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Volvulella tragula (Hedley, 1903).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Volvulella truncata Dell, 1956.
Records: South Island and Chatham Islands, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Family Tornatinidae P. Fischer, 1883.
Genus Acteocina J. E. Gray, 1847.
Acteocina apicina (A. Gould, 1859).
Records: Northern and eastern Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Acteocina excerta (Hedley, 1903).
Records: Northern and eastern Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Acteocina cf. hacketti (Cotton & Godfrey, 1933).
Records: Northern Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Superfamily Cylichoidea H. Adams & A. Adams, 1854.
Family Cylichnidae H. Adams & A. Adams, 1854.
Genus Cylichna Lovén, 1846.
Cylichna bulloidea Dell, 1956.
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Cylichna cumberlandiana (Strebel, 1908).
Records: Patagonia (Linse, 1999; Forcelli, 2000); South Georgia Is. (Strebel, 1908; Powell, 1951; Linse, 1999; Zelaya, 2005).

Cylichna gelida (E. A. Smith, 1907).
Records: Antarctic Polar Front (Jörger et al., 2014, as cf.); Weddell Sea (Engl, 2012); Elephant Is. (Engl, 2012); Decepcion Is., South Shetland Is. (Orrell, 2024) [238]; Ross Sea (Smith, 1907; Schiaparelli et al., 2006; Ghiglione et al., 2013); Davis Sea (Thiele, 1912).

Cylichna georgiana (Strebel, 1908).
Records: Patagonia (Argentina; Castellanos et al., 1987b; Bastida et al., 1992 [239]; Linse, 1999; Forcelli, 2000; Chile, Tierra del Fuego, SOMBASE, 2024); Falkland Is. (Bakker et al., 2024 [240]) South Georgia Is. (Strebel, 1908; Powell, 1951; Linse, 1999; Zelaya, 2005); Antarctic Polar Front (Jörger et al., 2014, as cf,); Kapp Norvegia, Weddell Sea (Gutt et al. 2000) [241].

Cylichna zealandica T. W. Kirk, 1880.
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2009).

Genus Toledonia Dall, 1902.
Toledonia biplicata (Strebel, 1908).
Records: Patagonia (Linse, 1999; Argentina, Forcelli, 2000; Chile, Cárdenas et al., 2008, Aldea et al., 2011 [203]); Falkland Is. (Strebel, 1908; Linse, 1999).
Remarks: In all cases, recorded as Acteon biplicatus (Strebel, 1908).

Toledonia brevior Eales, 1923.
Records: Ross Sea (MolluscaBase eds., 2025c) [242].

Toledonia bullata (A. Gould, 1847).
Records: Patagonia (Gould, 1847, as Tornatella bullata [243]; Rochebrune & Mabille, 1889, as Tornatella bullata; Castellanos et al., 1987b; Forcelli, 2000, as Acteon bullatus); Falkland Is. (Powell, 1951, as Acteon bullatus).

Toledonia circumrosa (Thiele, 1904).
Records: Kerguelen Is. (MolluscaBase eds., 2025d) [244].

Toledonia elata Thiele, 1912.
Records: Marion & Prince Edward Is. (Branch et al., 1991; Kerguelen Is. (Thiele, 1912; Troncoso et al., 2001); Weddell Sea (Engl, 2012); South Shetland Is. (Engl, 2012); Bransfield Strait (Engl, 2012); Amundsen Sea (Moreau et al., 2013, as cf.); Ross Sea (Ghiglione et al., 2013); Enderby Land, East Antarctica (Powell, 1958).

Toledonia globosa Hedley, 1916.
Records: Weddell Sea (Engl, 2012); Adelie Land (Hedley, 1916; Vicente & Arnaud, 1974; Dell, 1990; Ghiglione et al., 2013); Enderby Land, East Antarctica (Powell, 1951); Ross Sea (Powell, 1951).

Toledonia limnaeaeformis (E. A. Smith, 1879).
Records: Patagonia (Linse, 1999; Argentina, Castellanos et al., 1987a; Forcelli, 2000); Budwood Bank, Falkland Is. (SOMBASE, 2024), Marion & Prince Edward Is. (Branch et al., 1991; Kerguelen Is. (Smith, 1879, as Admete limnaeformis E. A Smith, 1877; Thiele, 1912; Linse, 1999); Bouvet Is. (Linse, 2006, as cf.); Antarctic Peninsula (Bouchet, 2010 [245]); Ross Sea (Linse, 1999; Ghiglione et al., 2013).

Toledonia major (Hedley, 1911).
Records: South Sandwich Is. (Dell, 1990); South Shetland Is. (Powell, 1951; Dell, 1990); Weddell Sea (Hain, 1990, as Toledonia cf. hedleyi A. W. B. Powell, 1958); Ross Sea (Hedley, 1916; Schiaparelli et al., 2006; Ghiglione et al., 2013); Adelie Land (Powell, 1958, as T. hedleyi A. W. B. Powell, 1958; Vicente & Arnaud, 1974); Davis Sea, East Antarctica (Thiele, 1912; Eales, 1923; Minichev, 1972).

Toledonia media Thiele, 1912.
Records: Kerguelen Is. (Thiele, 1912; Dell, 1990).

Toledonia palmeri Dell, 1990.
Records: Antarctic Peninsula (Thiele, 1912; Dell, 1990); Ross Sea (Ghiglione et al., 2013; Schiaparelli et al., 2014).

Toledonia parelata Dell, 1990.
Records: Patagonia (Linse, 1999); Magellan Strait and Beagle Channel (Dell, 1990; Rosenfeld & Aldea, 2011); Eastern Weddell Sea (SOMBASE, 2024).

Toledonia perplexa Dall, 1902.
Records: Magellan Strait (Dall, 1902; Dell, 1990); Patagonia (Linse, 1999; Aldea et al., 2011 [203]); Falkland Is. (Powell, 1951; Linse, 1999); Ross Sea (Schiaparelli et al., 2006, as aff.; Ghiglione et al., 2013 recorded as cf.; Schiaparelli et al. 2014, as cf.).

Toledonia punctata Thiele, 1912.
Records: Patagonia, Tierra del Fuego (Dell, 1990; Linse, 1999); Burdwood Bank, Falklans Is. (SOMBASE, 2024); Antarctic Polar Front (Jörger et al., 2014); South Georgia Is. (Powell, 1951; Dell, 1990; Linse, 1999; Zelaya, 2005); Kerguelen Is. (Thiele, 1912; Dell, 1990; Linse, 1999); Ross Sea (Dell, 1990; Linse, 1999; Ghiglione et al., 2013).

Toledonia striata Thiele, 1912.
Records: Antarctic Polar Front (Jörger et al., 2014); Bransfield Strait (Engl, 2012); Weddell Sea (Engl, 2012); Ross Sea (Dell, 1990; Schiaparelli et al., 2006; Ghiglione et al., 2013); Davis Sea (Thiele, 1912).

Toledonia succineaformis A. W. B. Powell, 1955.
Records: South Island, New Zealand; Subantarctic islands of New Zealand (Dell, 1990; Spencer et al., 2016).

Family Mnestiidae Oskars, Bouchet & Malaquias, 2015.
Genus Mnestia H. Adams & A. Adams, 1854.
Mnestia arachis (Quoy & Gaimard, 1833).
Records: Northern and Eastern Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018, as Adamnestia arachis (Quoy & Gaimard, 1833).

Family Diaphanidae Odhner, 1914 (1857).
Genus Diaphana T. Brown, 1827.
Diaphana anderssoni (Strebel, 1908).
Records: South Georgia (Strebel, 1908; Powell, 1951, as Retusa anderssoni Strebel, 1908; Linse & Schiotte, 2002 [246]).

Diaphana brazieri Angas, 1877.
Range: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Diaphana haini K. Linse & Schiotte, 2002.
Records: South Scotia Ridge (Engl, 2012); Weddell Sea (Linse & Schiotte, 2002); Antarctic Polar Front (Jörger et al., 2014, as cf.).

Diaphana inflata (Strebel, 1908).
Records: South Georgia (Strebel, 1908; Linse & Schiotte, 2002); South Scotia Ridge (Engl, 2012); Bouvet Is. (Linse, 2006, as cf.); North South Shetland Is, (Linse et al., 2002, as cf. [247]); Antarctic Polar Front (Jörger et al., 2014); Weddell Sea (Linse & Schiotte, 2002).

Diaphana paessleri (Strebel, 1905).
Records: Patagonia (Strebel, 1905, as Tornatina (Utriculus) paessleri Strebel, 1905; Linse, 1999; Argentina (Forcelli, 2000); Falkland Is. (Powell, 1951; Linse, 1999; Linse & Schiotte, 2002); South Georgia (Strebel, 1908; Linse & Schiotte, 2002; Zelaya, 2005); South Orkney Is. (Melvill & Standen, 1912, as Retusa antarctica Melville & Standen, 1912; Powell, 1951, as Retusa antarctica Melville & Standen, 1912; Linse & Schiotte, 2002); Marion & Prince Edward Is. (Branch et al., 1991, as Diaphana kerguelensis Thiele, 1912); Kerguelen Is. (Thiele, 1912, as Diaphana kerguelensis Thiele, 1912); Weddell Sea (Linse & Schiotte, 2002; Engl, 2012); South Shetland Is. (Engl, 2012); Ross Sea (Powell, 1960, as Retusa frigida Hedley, 1916; Dell, 1990, as Retusa frigida Hedley, 1916; Linse & Schiotte, 2002; Ghiglione et al., 2013); Davis Sea (Thiele, 1912, as Diaphana extrema Thiele, 1912).

Diaphana pfefferi (Strebel, 1908).
Records: South Georgia (Strebel, 1908; Powell, 1951; Linse & Schiotte, 2002; Zelaya, 2005).

Diaphana tasmanica (C. E. Beddome, 1883).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Superfamily Haminoeoidea Pilbry, 1895.
Family Haminoeidae Pilsbry, 1895.
Genus Aliculastrum Pilsbry, 1896.
Aliculastrum tumidum (Burn, 1978).
Records: Northern and eastern Tasmania (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018, as Nipponatys tumidus Burn, 1978).

Genus Cylichnatys Habe, 1952.
Cylichnatys campanula Burn, 1978.
Records: Northern and eastern Tasmania (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).

Genus Papawera Oskars & Malaquais, 2019.
Papawera maugeansis (Burn, 1966).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018; as Haminoea maugeansis Burn, 1966 [248]).

Papawera zelandiae (J. E. Gray, 1843).
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016, as Haminoea zelandiae (J. E. Gray, 1843).

Genus Roxaniella Monterosato, 1884.
Roxaniella exigua (A. Adams, 1850).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Burn, 2015, as Austrocylichna exigua (A. Adams, 1850).

Genus Liloa Pilsbry, 1921.
Liloa brevis (Quoy & Gaimard, 1833).
Records: Northern and eastern Tasmania (Burn, 2015; Grove, 2018).
Superfamily Newnesioidea Moles, Wägele, Schrödl & C. Àvila, 2016.

Family Newnesiidae Moles, Wägele, Schrödl & C. Àvila, 2016.
Genus Newnesia E. A. Smith, 1902.
Newnesia antarctica E.A. Smith, 1902 (Figure 3E).
Records: South Georgia (Zelaya, 2005); South Scotia Ridge (Engl, 2012); South Orkney Is. (Carcelles, 1953); Weddell Sea (Hedley, 1916; Hain, 1990; Schiaparelli et al., 2006; Engl, 2012); Antarctic Peninsula (Strebel, 1908, as Anderssonia sphinx Strebel, 1908; Aldea & Troncoso, 2008); Neumayer Channel, West Antarctica (Vayssière, 1917); South Shetland Is. (SOMBASE; this work); Ross Sea (Smith, 1902; Dell, 1990); Adelie Land (Hedley, 1916); Davis Sea (Minichev, 1972; Dell, 1990).
Remarks: Vayssière (1917) carried out a complete anatomical study of this species.

Newnesia abyssalis Moles, C. Àvila & Malaquias, 2017.
Records: Drake Passage (North South Shetlands Is.) (Moles et al., 2017a) [249].
Remarks: As indicated by its specific name, this species occurs at great depths.

Genus Hocius Moles, C. Àvila & Malaquias, 2017.
Hocius joani (Moles, Wägele, Schrödl & C. Àvila, 2017) (Figure 3F).
Records: North South Shetlands Is. (Moles et al., 2017c) [250]; Weddell Sea (Rauschert & Arntz, 2015, as Newnesia sp.; this work).
Remarks: Initially described as Newnesia joani (Moles et al., 2017c) [250]. It differs from the type of the genus Newnesia because it has an internal rather than an external shell.

Superfamily Philinoidea Gray, 1850 (1815).
Family Aglajidae Pilsbry, 1895 (1947).
Genus Melanochlamys Cheeseman, 1881.
Melanochlamys cylindrica Cheeseman, 1881.
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Melanochlamys handrecki Burn, 2010.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2015).

Melanochlamys lorrainae (Rudman, 1968).
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Melanochlamys queritor (Burn, 1957).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2015).

Genus Philinopsis Pease, 1860.
Philinopsis gigliolii (Tapparone Canefri, 1874).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2015, as Philinopsis taronga J. K. Allan, 1933).
Remarks: Recently, Chaban et al. (2024) [251] studied by molecular methods specimens of P. gigliolii from the coasts of Japan and specimens attributed to Ph. taronga from Australia. They concluded that the latter species is synonymous with Ph. gigliolii. This species has an unusual antitropical distribution in temperate and subtropical waters of both hemispheres.

Family Gastropteridae.
Genus Sagaminopteron Tokioka & Baba, 1964.
Sagaminopteron ornatum Tokioka & Baba, 1964.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).
Family Antarctophilinidae Moles, C. Àvila & Malaquias, 2019.

Genus Antarctophiline Chaban, 2016.

Antarctophiline abyssalis Peralta-Serrano, Schrödl, N. G. Wilson & Moles, 2025.
Records: South Atlantic Ridge between South Sandwich Is. to Bouvel Is. (Peralta-Serrano et al., 2025).
Remarks: This new species is described based on six specimens collected between 2892 and 4547 m deep.

Antarctophiline alata (Thiele, 1912) (Figure 3C,D).
Records: Patagonia (Argentina, Forcelli, 2000); South Sandwich Is. (Powell, 1951); South Orkney Is. (Powell, 1951); Kerguelen Is. (Thiele, 1912, as Philine amoena Thiele, 1925; Troncoso et al., 2001, as Philine cf. amoena Thiele, 1925); Bouvet Island (Arntz et al., 2006); Weddell Sea (Hain, 1990; Engl, 2012; this work); South Shetland Is. (Powell, 1951; Troncoso et al., 1996; Troncoso et al., 1999; Arnaud et al., 2001; Aldea & Troncoso, 2008; Engl, 2012; this work); Palmer Archipelago (Powell, 1951); Bellingshausen Sea (Aldea et al., 2008; Aldea et al., 2009; Aldea & Troncoso, 2010); Ross Sea (Ghiglione et al., 2013; Schiaparelli et al., 2014); Enderby Land (Powell, 1958); Adelie Land (Vicente & Arnaud, 1974); Davis Sea, East Antarctica (Thiele, 1912);
Remarks: This species was recorded under Philine. Based on differences in penial and gizzard plate morphology, Chaban (2016) [252] established the new genus Antarctophiline, which includes alata and gibba species and the recently described easmithi and amundseni. Based on morphological and molecular data, Moles et al. (2019) [253], erected the new family Antarctophlinidae to include most of the Philinoidea species from the Southern Ocean, including those mentioned above.

Antarctophiline amundseni Moles, C. Àvila & Malaquias, 2019.
Records: Eastern Weddell Sea (Moles et al., 2019).
Remarks: Lives at depths between 736 and 910 m (Moles et al., 2019) [253].

Antarctophiline apertissima (E. A. Smith, 1902).
Records: Antarctic Polar Front (Jörger et al., 2014, as cf,); Ross Sea (Smith, 1902; Powell, 1960; Dell, 1990; Cattaneo-Vietti et al., 2000).
Remarks: Until the revision of the Antarctic Philinoidea (Moles et al., 2019) [253], this species was included within the genus Philine.

Antarctophiline easmithi Moles, C. Àvila & Malaquias, 2019.
Records: Eastern Weddell Sea (Moles et al., 2019) [253].
Remarks: Known so far to live in depths between 173 and 463 m (Moles et al., 2019) [253].

Antarctophiline falklandica (A. W. B. Powell, 1951).
Records: Patagonia (Linse, 1999; Argentina, Castellanos et al., 1987b; Forcelli, 2000); Falkland Is. (Powell, 1951; Linse, 1999).
Remarks: Until the revision of the Antarctic Philinoidea (Moles et al., 2019) [253], this species was included within the genus Philine.

Antarctophiline gibba (Strebel, 1908).
Records: South Georgia Is. (Strebel, 1908; Powell, 1951; Carcelles, 1953; Seager, 1978; Zelaya, 2005); South Orkney (Doello-Jurado, 1918) [254]; Eastern Weddell Sea (SOMBASE, 2024); East Antarctica (Chaban, 2016); Ross Sea (Chaban, 2016).
Remarks: As for A. alata, A. gibba is the type species of the new genus Antarctophiline. Chaban (2016) found this species to be very abundant in Prydz Bay (East Antarctica) on muddy bottoms between 5 and 37 m deep, accounting for 5–40 individuals per square meter.

Antarctophiline malaquiasi Peralta-Serrano, Schrödl, N. G. Wilson & Moles, 2025.
Records: Bransfield Strait, West Antarctica (Peralta-Serrano et al., 2025).
Remarks: This new species was described based on two specimens collected between 150 and 247 m deep.

Genus Waegelea Moles, C. Àvila & Malaquias, 2019.
Waegelea antarctica (E. A. Smith, 1902).
Records: Weddell Sea (Moles et al., 2019); Ross Sea (Smith, 1902; Powell, 1960; Cattaneo-Vietti et al., 2000; Ghiglione et al., 2017).
Remarks: Until the revision of the Antarctic Philinoidea (Moles et al., 2019), this species was included within the genus Philine.

Family Philinidae Gray, 1850 (1815).
Genus Philine Ascanius, 1772.
Philine angasi (Crosse, 1865).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018); South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Philine auriformis Suter, 1909.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018); South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Philine beachportensis Verco, 1909.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Philine columnaria Hedley & May, 1908.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Philine constricta Murdoch & Suter, 1906.
Records: South Island & Chatham Islands, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Philine powelli Rudman, 1970.
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Philine teres Hedley, 1903.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Philine umbilicata Murdoch & Suter, 1906.
Records: South Island & Chatham Islands, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Genus Praephiline Chaban & Soldatenko, 2009.
Praephiline thurmanni (Ev. Marcus & Er. Marcus, 1969).
Records: Patagonia (Argentina; Forcelli, 2000; Price et al., 2011).
Remarks: This species has been recorded as Philine thurmanni Ev. Marcus & Er. Marcus, 1969, and Laona thurmanni (Ev. Marcus & Er. Marcus, 1969).

Genus Spiraphiline Moles, C. Àvila & Malaquias, 2019.
Spiraphiline bathyalis Moles, C. Àvila & Malaquias, 2019.
Records: Eastern Weddell Sea (Moles et al., 2019).
Remarks: Its specific name indicates the great depth (2004 m) at which the only specimen that served to describe the species was found.

Spiraphiline kerguelensis (Thiele, 1925).
Records: Falkland Is. (Powell, 1960); Kerguelen Is. (Powell, 1951); Kapp Norvegia, Eastern Weddell Sea (SOMBASE, 2024).
Remarks: Until the revision of the Antarctic Philinoidea (Moles et al., 2019), this species was included within the genus Philine.

Family Scaphandridae G. O. Sars, 1878.
Genus Kaitoa Marwick, 1931.
Kaitoa scaphandroides A. W. B. Powell, 1951.
Records: South Georgia Is. (Powell, 1951; Carcelles, 1953; Zelaya, 2005).

Genus Scaphander Montfort, 1810.
Scaphander illecebrosus Iredale, 1925.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Scaphander interruptus Dall, 1889.
Records: Patagonia (Argentina, Forcelli, 2000; Chile, Valdés & McLean, 2015).

Scaphander otagoensis Montfort, 1810.
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Order Runcinida.
Superfamily Runcinoidea H. Adams & A. Adams, 1854.
Family Runcinidae H. Adams & A. Adams, 1854.
Genus Runcina Forbes [in Forbes & Hanley], 1851.
Runcina australis Burn, 1963.
Records: Northern Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Runcina katipoides (M. C. Miller & Rudman, 1968).
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Order Pteropoda Cuvier, 1804.
Suborder Euthecosomata Meisenheimer, 1905.
Superfamily Cavolinioidea J. E. Gray, 1850 (1815).
Family Cavoliniidae J. E. Gray, 1850 (1815).
Genus Cavolinia Abildgaard, 1791.
Cavolinia gibbosa (A. d’Orbigny, 1836).
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Cavolinia inflexa (Lesueur, 1813).
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Cavolinia tridentata (Forsskål, 1775).
Records: South Island, Chatham Islands and Subantarctic islands of New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Cavolinia uncinata (A. d’Orbigny, 1835).
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Genus Diacavolinia van del Spoel, 1987.
Diacavolinia longirostris (Blainville, 18212).
Records: West Antarctica (Powell, 1960).

Genus Diacria J. E. Gray, 1847.
Diacria trispinosa (Blainville, 1821).
Records: South Island, Chatham Islands and Subantarctic islands of New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Family Cliidae Jeffreys, 1869.
Genus Clio Linnaeus, 1767.
Clio recurva Children, 1823.
Records: Antarctic Peninsula, Weddell Sea, East Antarctica (Australian Antarctic Data Centre, 2024, as Clio balantium Rang, 1834).

Clio chapalii Gray, 1950.
Records: Antarctic Peninsula, Weddell Sea, East Antarctica (Australian Antarctic Data Centre, 2024).

Clio cuspidata (Bosc, 1802).
Records: South Island and Chatham Islands, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Clio piatkowskii van der Spoel, Schalk & Bleker, 1992.
Records: Weddell Sea (Van der Spoel et al., 1992); Lazarev Sea (Hunt et al., 2008).

Clio pyramidata Linnaeus, 1767.
Records: Patagonia (Argentina, Forcelli, 2000; Dadon & Chauvin, 1998); Falkland Is. (Dadon & Chauvin, 1998); South Georgia Is. (Powell, 1960, as Clio sulcata (Pfeffer, 1879); Hunt et al., 2008); South Sandwich Is. (Powell, 1951, as Cleodora sulcata Pfeffer, 1879); Prince Edward Is. (Hunt et al., 2008); Lazarev Sea (Hunt et al., 2008); Weddell Sea (Würzberg et al., 2009); Antarctic Peninsula (Hunt et al., 2008); Amundsen Sea (Moreau et al., 2013); Ross Sea (Hunt et al., 2008); East Antarctica (Hunt et al., 2008).
Remarks: In most records, it is recorded as Clio antarctica Dall, 1908.

Family Hyalocylidae A. W. Janssen, 2020.
Genus Hyalocylis Fol, 1875.
Hyalocylis striata (Rang, 1828).
Records: South Island and Chatham Islands, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016); West Antarctica (Powell, 1960).

Family Creseidae Rampal, 1973.
Genus Creseis Rang, 1828.
Creseis acicula (Rang, 1828).
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).
Remarks: Frequently recorded as Creseis clava (Rang, 1828).

Creseis conica Eschscholtz, 1829.
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).
Remarks: Recorded in WoRMS as uncertain/taxon inquirendum.

Genus Styliola Gray, 1850.
Styliola subula (Quoy & Gaimard, 1827).
Records: South Island and Chatham Islands, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Family Cuvierinidae van der Spoel, 1967.
Genus Cuvierina Boas, 1886.
Cuvierina columnella (Rang, 1827).
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Superfamily Limacinoidea Gray, 1840.
Family Limacinidae Gray, 1840.
Genus Limacina Bosc, 1817.
Limacina bulimoides (A. d’Orbigny, 1836).
Records: South Island and Chatham Islands, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Limacina costulata Preston, 1916.
Records: South Shetland Is. (Powell, 1951).
Remarks: This species is recorded in WoRMS as uncertain/taxon inquirendum.

Limacina helicina (Phipps, 1774) (Figure 11C,D).
Records: Patagonia (Dadon & Chauvin, 1998; Linse, 1999); South Georgia Is. (Powell, 1951; Hunt et al., 2008); South Sandwich Is. (Powell, 1951); Prince Edward Is. (Hunt et al., 2008); south New Zealand (Powell, 1960); Lazarev Sea (Hunt et al., 2008; Würzberg et al., 2009); Weddell Sea (Hunt et al., 2008; present work); Antarctic Peninsula (Hunt et al., 2008); Bellingshausen Sea (Hunt et al., 2008); Amundsen Sea (Moreau et al., 2013); Ross Sea (Hunt et al., 2008); East Antarctica (Hunt et al., 2008).
Remarks: In many publications, it is recorded as Spiratella helicina (Phipps, 1774).

Limacina lesueurii (A. d’Orbigny, 1836).
Records: South Island and Chatham Islands, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Limacina rangii (A. d’Orbigny, 1834).
Records: Patagonia (Argentina, Forcelli, 2000;); King George Is. (Schrödl et al., 2016); Ross Sea (Smith, 1902; Brueggeman et al., 1999); South Island, Chatham Islands and Subantarctic islands of New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).
Remarks: In most records, it is recorded as Limacina antarctica S. P. Woodward, 1854.

Limacina retroversa (J. Fleming,1823).
Records: Patagonia (Dadon & Chauvin, 1998; Linse, 1999); South Georgia Is. (Powell, 1951, as L. balea; Hunt et al., 2008); South Sandwich Is. (Powell, 1951, as Limacina balea Moller, 1841); Prince Edward Is. (Hunt et al., 2008); Antarctic Peninsula (Hunt et al., 2008); Ross Sea (Hunt et al., 2008); East Antarctica (Australian Antarctica Data Centre, 2024).

Limacina trochiformis (A. d’Orbigny, 1836).
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Family Heliconoididae Rampal, 2019.
Genus Heliconoides A. d’Orbigny, 1835.
Heliconoides inflatus (A. d’Orbigny, 1835).
Records: Southern New Zealand (Powell, 1960); Ross Sea (Powell, 1960)

Family Thieleidae Rampal, 2019.
Genus Thielea Strebel, 1908.
Thielea helicoides (Jeffreys, 1877).
Records: Patagonia (Powell, 1960; Linse, 1999; both as Thilea procera Strebel, 1908); Chatham Islands and Subantarctic islands of New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016); Antarctic Peninsula, Weddell Sea, East Antarctica (Australian Antarctic Data Centre, 2024, as Limacina helicoides Jeffreys, 1877).

Family Peraclididae.
Genus Peracle Forbes, 1844.
Peracle diversa (Monterosato, 1875).
Records: South Island and Chatham Islands, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Suborder Gymnosomata Blainville, 1824.
Superfamily Clionoidea Rafinesque, 1815.
Family Clionidae Rafinesque, 1815.
Genus Clione Pallas, 1774.
Clione antarctica E. A. Smith, 1902 (Figure 11A).
Records: Patagonia (Argentina, Forcelli, 2000; Linse, 1999); South Georgia Is. (Powell, 1951; Linse, 1999; Hunt et al., 2008); South Sandwich Is (Powell, 1951; Linse, 1999); Bouvet Is. (Linse, 1999); Prince Edward Is. (Hunt et al., 2008); Weddell Sea (present work, one animal, 13 mm in length, collected during the 2003–2004 ANT XXI/2 Polarstern expedition; Hunt et al., 2008; Würzberg et al., 2009); Lazarev Sea (Hunt et al., 2008); Antarctic Peninsula (Hunt et al., 2008); King George Is. (Schrödl et al., 2016); Ross Sea (Smith, 1902; Hedley, 1916; Brueggeman et al., 1999; Linse, 1999; Hunt et al., 2008); Adélie Land (Linse, 1999); Davis Sea, East Antarctica (Minichev, 1972; Hunt et al., 2008).
Remarks: Recorded in some records as Clione limacina antarctica E. A. Smith, 1902. Gilmer and Lalli (1990) carried out a comparative morphological and anatomical study of Clione specimens from the northern hemisphere and Antarctic waters and concluded that there are enough differences for the existence of two species, Clione limacina (Phipps, 1774), distributed in the northern hemisphere, and Clione antarctica, distributed in the southern hemisphere. Molecular studies are needed to confirm this.

Genus Thliptodon Boas, 1886.
Thliptodon diaphanus (Meisenheimer, 1902).
Records: South Island and Subantarctic islands of New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Thliptodon gegenbauri Boas, 1886.
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Family Cliopsidae O. G. Costa, 1873.
Genus Cliopsis Troschel, 1854.
Cliopsis krohniii Troschel, 1854.
Records: South Island, Chatham Islands and Subantarctic islands of New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Family Hydromylidae Pruvot-Fol, 1942 (1862).
Genus Hydromyles Gistel, 1848.
Hydromyles globulosus (Rang, 1825).
Records: South Island, Chatham Islands and Subantarctic islands of New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Family Pneumodermatidae Latreille, 1825.
Genus Pneumodermopsis W. Keferstein, 1862.
Pneumodermopsis macrochira Meisenheimer, 1905.
Records: South Island, Chatham Islands and Subantarctic islands of New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Pneumodermopsis paucidens (Boas, 1886).
Records: Chatham Islands and Subantarctic islands of New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Genus Schizobrachium Meisenheimer, 1903.
Schizobrachium polycotylum Meisenheimer, 1903.
Records: Chatham Islands and Subantarctic islands of New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Genus Spongiobranchia A. d’Orbigny, 1836.
Spongiobranchia australis A. d’Orbigny, 1836 (Figure 11B).
Records: Patagonia (Argentina; Pelseneer, 1887; Linse, 1999; Forcelli, 2000); South Georgia Is. (Powell, 1951; Linse, 1999; Hunt et al., 2008); South Sandwich Is (Powell, 1951; Linse, 1999); Bouvet Island (Powell, 1960); Prince Edward Is. (Hunt et al., 2008); Antarctic Peninsula (Hunt et al., 2008); Weddell Sea (present work, two animals, 15 and 18 mm in length, collected during the 2003–2004 ANT XXI/2 Polarstern expedition; Hunt et al., 2008; Würzberg et al., 2009); Lazarev Sea (Hunt et al., 2008); Ross Sea (Smith, 1902; Hedley, 1916, as Cliodita caducens Quoy & Gaimard, 1825; Linse, 1999); East Antarctica (Hunt et al., 2008); South Island, Chatham Islands and Subantarctic islands of New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).
Remarks: Species in this genus have sometimes been erroneously referred to as Spongiobranchaea.

Spongiobranchia intermedia Pruvot-Fol, 1926.
Records: South Island, Chatham Islands and Subantarctic islands of New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Family Notobranchaeidae Pelseneer, 1886.
Genus Notobranchaea Pelseneer, 1886.
Notobranchaea macdonaldi Pelseneer, 1886.
Records: South Island, Chatham Islands and Subantarctic islands of New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Notobranchaea tetrabranchiata Bonnevie, 1913.
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).
Figure 11. Pteropoda. Clione antarctica, specimen from the Weddell Sea. (A): On the left, ventral view of the animal with the parapodia extended; on the right, the animal curled up. (B): Spongiobranchia australis from the Weddell Sea; Limacina helicina from the Weddell Sea. (C): Animal swimming. (D): Animal retracted inside its shell. Original photos by M. Ballesteros. Scale bars are 10 mm.
Figure 11. Pteropoda. Clione antarctica, specimen from the Weddell Sea. (A): On the left, ventral view of the animal with the parapodia extended; on the right, the animal curled up. (B): Spongiobranchia australis from the Weddell Sea; Limacina helicina from the Weddell Sea. (C): Animal swimming. (D): Animal retracted inside its shell. Original photos by M. Ballesteros. Scale bars are 10 mm.
Diversity 17 00330 g011
Suborder Pseudothecosomata Meisenheimer, 1905.
Superfamily Cymbulioidea Gray, 1840.
Family Peraclidae Tesch, 1913.
Genus Peracle Forbes, 1844.
Peracle diversa (Monterosato, 1875).
Records: South Island and Chatham Islands, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016, as Peracle apicifulva Meisenheimer, 1906).

Family Cymbuliidae Gray, 1840.
Genus Cymbulia Péron & Lesueur, 1810.
Cymbulia parvidentata Pelseneer, 1888.
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Superorder Sacoglossa Ihering, 1876.
Superfamily Plakobranchoidea Gray, 1840.
Family Hermaeidae H. Adams & A. Adams, 1854.
Genus Polybranchia Pease, 1860.
Polybranchia pallens (Burn, 1957).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Genus Aplysiopsis deshayes, 1853.
Aplysiopsis brattstroemi (Er. Marcus, 1959).
Records: Patagonia (Linse, 1999; Chile, Forcelli, 2000).

Family Limapontiidae Gray, 1847.
Genus Ercolania Trinhese, 1872.
Ercolania boodleae (Baba, 1938).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Ercolania evelinae (Er. Marcus, 1959).
Records: Patagonia (Chile, Forcelli, 2000; Linse, 1999).

Ercolania felina (F. W. Hutton, 1882).
Records: South Island, New Zealand (Spencer et al., 2016).

Ercolania margaritae Burn, 1974.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Genus Placida Trinchese, 1876.
Placida aoteana (A. W. B. Powell, 1937).
Records: New Zealand (Powell, 1937 [255]; Willan, 1984 [256]).

Placida dendritica (Alder & Hancock, 1843).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).
Remarks: This species is native to the coast of the United Kingdom and is also present in numerous locations in the Mediterranean Sea. Furthermore, it has been reported in temperate and cold–temperate waters globally, although there is some doubt as to whether it is a species complex, as has been revealed for other sacoglossans, such as Placida cremoniana (Trinchese, 1892), according to Mccarthy et al. (2017) [257].

Genus Sacoproteus Krug, Wong, M. R. Medina, Gosliner & Á. Valdés, 2018.
Sacoproteus browni Krug, Wong, M. R. Medina, Gosliner & Á. Valdés, 2018.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018, as Stiliger smaragdinus Baba, 1949).

Family Plakobranchidae Gray, 1840.
Genus Elysia Risso, 1818.
Elysia cf. hedgpethi Er. Marcus, 1961.
Records: Patagonia (Chile, Forcelli, 2000).

Elysia patagonica Muniain & Ortea, 1997.
Records: Patagonia (Linse, 1999; Chile, Forcelli, 2000).

Superfamily Oxynooidea Stoliczka, 1868 (1847).
Family Juliidae E. A. Smith, 1885.
Genus Berthelinia Crosse, 1875.
Berthelinia australis (Burn, 1960).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Berthelinia babai (Burn, 1965).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Berthelinia typica (Gatliff & Gabriel, 1911).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Family Oxynoiidae Stoliczka, 1868 (1847).
Genus Oxynoe Rafinesque, 1814.
Oxynoe jacksoni Krug, Berriman & Á. Valdés, 2018.
Records: Tasmania, Australia (S. Grove, 2015).

Oxynoe viridis (Pease, 1861).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Genus Roburnella Ev. Marcus, 1982.
Roburnella wilsoni (Tate, 1889).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

Family Volvatellidae Pilsbry, 1895.
Genus Ascobulla Ev. Marcus, 1972.
Ascobulla fischeri (A. Adams & Angas, 1864).
Records: Tasmania, Australia (Grove, 2018).

4. Discussion and Conclusions

Of the nearly 250,000 known species from the marine environment (WoRMS, 2024), a little over 50,000 are extant species of marine mollusks, with many new species described each year (6656 species in the period 2000–2014; Bouchet et al., 2023) [258]. A study similar to the present work was carried out by Primo and Vazquez (2014) [259], who explored the diversity of ascidians occurring south of the subtropical front. That study reported a total diversity of 245 species, with 50–60% of those found to occur at depths <2000 m. Deep-sea biodiversity across most of the global ocean remains poorly studied, and there are likely numerous species yet to be discovered, in both the benthic and pelagic realms. This is certainly the case for benthic mollusks, as demonstrated by Peñas and Rolan (2010, 2016, 2017) [260,261,262], with recent descriptions for several hundred new species of deep-water tropical Pacific pyramidellids. In the case of sea slugs, most species of the Cephalaspidea group live in soft sediments, where they can bury themselves to search for food (Oskars et al., 2015) [263]; it is highly likely that large numbers of unknown species are yet to be found across the vast expanse of unexplored deep-benthic sediments of the Southern Ocean.
Many works have been published regarding the composition and diversity of sea slug fauna, particularly in regard to specific geographic areas, for example, the Caribbean Sea (Valdés et al., 2006) [264], the southern tip of South America (Schrödl, 2003) [63], South Africa (Gosliner, 1987) [265], Australia (Burn, 2015 [266]; Cobb & Willan, 2006 [267]; Coleman, 2001, 2008 [268,269]; Nimbs et al., 2020 [270,271]; Nimbs & Smith, 2017a [147]), the western Indian Ocean (Rudman, 1984, 1986, 1988 [133,134,135]; Yonow, 2000, 2012, 2015 [272,273,274]) and the central and eastern Indian Ocean (Apte, 2009 [275]; Apte et al., 2010 [276]). There are a few works that have explored sea slug diversity across oceans: the broad Indo-Pacific (Coleman, 2001, 2008, 2015 [268,269,277]; Gosliner et al., 2015) [278] and the Pacific coast from Alaska to Central America (Behrens et al., 2022) [279]. Garcia and Bertsch (2009) [280] studied the global sea slug fauna of the Atlantic Ocean. These last authors estimated a diversity of 1066 species of Cephalaspidea, Aplysiida, Sacoglossa and Nudibranchia in the Atlantic Ocean. Diversity in the Indo-Pacific is thought to be much higher, with some 6000 species thought to be present (Gosliner & Draheim, 1996) [281]. Certainly, across most oceans, there is a pattern of increasing species richness from the polar to the tropical regions (Rudman & Willan, 1998 [282]; García & Bertsch, 2009) [280]. The diversity for the Southern Ocean (394 species) presented here may seem low in comparison to the larger oceans but it is important to recognize that in most of the Southern Ocean (>41 ° S) there are few shallow coastal areas and large ice masses around Antarctica, so the vast majority of the area of the Southern Ocean comprises unknown bathyal and abyssal benthoses.
Of the known 81 species of Ringiculimorpha (MolluscaBase, 2025e) [283], only one has been recorded in the Southern Ocean below 41 °S (South Island of New Zealand; Powell, 1979) [152]; species in this group live on sandy and muddy sediments, many of them at great depths. This suggests how little is known about this group in bathyal and abyssal areas of the Southern Ocean. The Umbraculida and Runcinacea are two groups of sea slugs with few known species (11 and 76 species, respectively), and the 4 species reported in this work for the Southern Ocean have been found in the lower latitudes of the study area: Tasmania and the South Island of New Zealand. This indicates that these groups prefer temperate or warm waters. No species have been recorded for the Southern Ocean from two enigmatic and little-known groups of marine Heterobranchia, the Acochlidiimorpha and Rhodopoidea. These groups, with few species, live preferably in the interstitial environment or among algae, are generally very small in size, and some species resemble turbellarians. All these characteristics and the methodological problems associated with the study of interstitial fauna in vivo mean that very little is known about the biodiversity and biology of these groups. Their absence from high latitudes in the southern hemisphere may simply be due to the lack of specific studies.
The colder waters south of the south subtropical convergence appear to be unfavorable for marine heterobranch species in the Ringiculimorpha, Umbraculida, Runcinacea, Aplysiida and Sacoglossa. Species from these groups have only been reported from the Patagonian/Magellanic zone, Tasmania and the South Island of New Zealand. The first three groups have already been discussed above, and species in Aplysiida and Sacoglossa are more common in warm and tropical waters, where the vast majority of species live, with the polar areas being devoid of them (Jensen, 2007; Nimbs et al., 2017) [147,284]; the species in these two groups are herbivorous, and it is possible that these polar environments do not have the suitable types of algae that these sea slugs can feed on. Nudibranchs and cephalaspideans appear to be well adapted to the cold waters of the Southern Ocean, where 209 and 90 species have been recorded, respectively. The biodiversity of nudibranchs is particularly notable on the island of Tasmania, with 93 species cited, possibly due to the subtropical species that reach the island, favored by the warm-water marine currents that flow southwards from the eastern coasts of Australia. Nudibranchs, with 40 species, have been shown to be the most diverse of all groups in the waters of Antarctica, living from a few meters to bathyal depths of more than 1000 m. This adaptation to very cold waters has led to the evolution of very long biological cycles with an extreme duration of embryonic development (for example, Bathydoris hodgsoni and Doris kerguelenensis; Moles et al., 2017b [285] and Ballesteros, 2024 [286]). Indeed, Tergipes antarcticus spends its entire life cycle on ice (Kiko et al., 2008) [287]. An interesting point is the distribution of Doris kerguelenensis, which has been recorded in Antarctic areas, in all Subantarctic areas and in the Patagonian/Magallanes region, both on the Pacific side of Chile and on the Atlantic coast of Argentina. Morphological and molecular studies that are in progress may reveal multiple speciation attributed to this species.
Regarding cephalaspideans, although their found biodiversity is relatively high with 90 cited species, we consider that this figure does not correspond to their possible real biodiversity; most species live on soft bottoms down to great depths, which have not been sufficiently studied at the microfauna level. A very large part of the Southern Ocean is made up of abyssal plains that have not been scientifically explored; it is assumed that future studies of these deep areas will bring to light numerous unknown species of marine heterobranchs, mainly small-shelled cephalaspidean species that inhabit abyssal bottoms, as has occurred with other groups of mollusca, such as the Pyramidelloidea, in the deep tropical Central and South Pacific (Peñas & Rolan, 2010, 2016, 2017) [260,261,262].
With regard to the Pteropoda, it is recognized that many species have a wide distribution due to their pelagic life histories, but the recent work of Burridge et al. (2017) [288] has identified that, in the Atlantic Ocean at least, pteropod abundance and biomass is significantly higher in latitudes >40 °S. The pteropods are a highly important component of pelagic ecosystems, where they can reach very high densities (up to 800 individuals/m3 for Limacina retroversa and up to 2681 individuals/m3 for Limacina helicina) (Hunt et al., 2008) [61]. There are concerns that ocean acidification will generate an undersaturation of dissolved carbonate ions, meaning that the Thecosomata will have reduced capacity to form their aragonite shells and may possibly disappear from the Southern Ocean by the year 2100 (Orr et al., 2005; Hunt et al., 2008) [61,289]. The Thecosomata are thought to be the preferred food of the Gymnosomata, and, in turn, both groups are an important food source for a wide variety of pelagic and demersal fish. Given the potential collapse of thecosome populations due to ocean acidification, Southern Ocean food webs may undergo a trophic cascade, resulting in major changes to both biodiversity and food-chain biomass.
Although some areas may be considered well-worked with regard to sea slug biodiversity (i.e., Tasmania, the Southern Island of New Zealand, the Patagonia/Magellan area, the Ross Sea and the Weddell Sea), many knowledge gaps remain, such as the distributional statuses of some species thought to be broadly distributed but with little dispersive capacity (for example, Doris kerguelenensis). Current knowledge of very remote areas such as Prince Edwards Is., the New Zealand Subantarctic islands (Chatham, Bounty, Antipodes, Campbell, Auckland and The Shares), Bouvet Is., Macquarie Is., the Amundsen Sea, the East Antarctica, and bathyal and abyssal depths may represent a small portion of species diversity from these locations. It is likely that efforts to further sample these locations may yield large numbers of species, many of which may be novel. Information derived from these regional and remote studies may provide important detail on community composition and biogeographic connectivity across the vast Southern Ocean.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.B.; methodology, M.B., A.H. and M.S.; software, A.H., M.S. and M.J.N.; validation, all authors; formal analysis, all authors; investigation, M.B. and A.H.; resources, M.B. and M.J.N.; data curation, M.B., A.H. and M.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.B. and A.H.; writing—review and editing, all authors; visualization, M.B.; supervision, M.B.; project administration, M.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study did not require ethical approval.

Data Availability Statement

The data for this work have been compiled from numerous published articles.

Acknowledgments

We thank Heike Wägele for critically reviewing the first draft of this manuscript. Gary MacDonald has been kind enough to provide us with an abundant bibliography that we were unable to access. Huw Griffiths has supported us with the SOMBASE resources. The first author also greatly thanks the Bentart 2006 campaign researchers Javier Cristobo and Jose Antonio Moya, who were of indispensable help during the scuba dives carried out in Fildes Bay on King George Island. The first author has benefited from the resources of the Benthic Biology and Ecology (BEB) research group of the University of Barcelona, to which he belongs. The last author is grateful to staff from the New South Wales Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development library services for assistance.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Tynan, C.T. Ecological importance of the southern boundary of the Antarctic Circumpolar Current. Nature 1998, 392, 708–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lawver, L.A.; Gahagan, L.M.; Daiziel, I.W.D. Chapter 3.2. Reconstruction of the Southern Ocean and Antarctic regions. In Biogeographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean; De Broyer, C., Koubbi, P., Griffiths, H.J., Raymond, B., d’Udekem d’Acoz, C., Van de Putte, A.P., Danis, B., David, B., Grant, S., Gutt, J., et al., Eds.; Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research: Cambridge, UK, 2014; pp. 36–42. [Google Scholar]
  3. Knox, G.A. Biology of the Southern Ocean; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2006; 640p. [Google Scholar]
  4. Briggs, J.C.; Bowden, B.W. A realignment of the marine biogeographic provinces with particular reference for fish distributions. J. Biogeogr. 2012, 39, 12–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Toonen, R.J.; Bowen, B.W.; Iacchei, M.; Briggs, J.C. Biogeography, Marine. In Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Biology; Kliman, R.M., Ed.; Academic Press: Oxford, UK, 2016; Volume 1, pp. 166–178. [Google Scholar]
  6. Brandt, A.; De Broyer, C.; De Mesel, I.; Ellingsen, K.E.; Gooday, A.J.; Hilbig, B.; Tyler, P.A. The biodiversity of the deep Southern Ocean benthos. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2007, 362, 39–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. De Broyer, C.; Jazdzeska, A. Chapter 5.17. Biogeographic patterns of Southern Ocean benthic Amphipoda. In Biogeographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean; De Broyer, C., Koubbi, P., Griffiths, H.J., Raymond, B., d’Udekem d’Acoz, C., Van de Putte, A.P., Danis, B., David, B., Grant, S., Gutt, J., et al., Eds.; Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research: Cambridge, UK, 2014; pp. 155–165. [Google Scholar]
  8. Griffiths, H.J.; Barnes, D.K.; Linse, K. Towards a generalized biogeography of the Southern Ocean benthos. J. Biogeogr. 2008, 36, 162–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wiencke, C.; Ansler, C.D.; Clayton, M.N. Chapter 5.1. Macroalgae. In Biogeographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean; De Broyer, C., Koubbi, P., Griffiths, H.J., Raymond, B., d’Udekem d’Acoz, C., Van de Putte, A.P., Danis, B., David, B., Grant, S., Gutt, J., et al., Eds.; Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research: Cambridge, UK, 2014; pp. 66–73. [Google Scholar]
  10. Janussen, D.; Downey, R. Chapter 5.5. Porifera. In Biogeographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean; De Broyer, C., Koubbi, P., Griffiths, H.J., Raymond, B., d’Udekem d’Acoz, C., Van de Putte, A.P., Danis, B., David, B., Grant, S., Gutt, J., et al., Eds.; Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research: Cambridge, UK, 2014; pp. 94–102. [Google Scholar]
  11. Peña, A.L. Chapter 5.6. Benthic Hydroids (Cnidaria, Hydrozoa). In Biogeographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean; De Broyer, C., Koubbi, P., Griffiths, H.J., Raymond, B., d’Udekem d’Acoz, C., Van de Putte, A.P., Danis, B., David, B., Grant, S., Gutt, J., et al., Eds.; Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research: Cambridge, UK, 2014; pp. 103–106. [Google Scholar]
  12. Rodriguez, E.; Fautin, D.G. Antarctic Hexacorals (Cnidaria, Anthozoa, Hexacorallia). In Biogeographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean; De Broyer, C., Koubbi, P., Griffiths, H.J., Raymond, B., d’Udekem d’Acoz, C., Van de Putte, A.P., Danis, B., David, B., Grant, S., Gutt, J., et al., Eds.; Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research: Cambridge, UK, 2014; pp. 113–116. [Google Scholar]
  13. Schüller, M.; Ebbe, B. Chapter 5–13. Polychaetes. In Biogeographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean; De Broyer, C., Koubbi, P., Griffiths, H.J., Raymond, B., d’Udekem d’Acoz, C., Van de Putte, A.P., Danis, B., David, B., Grant, S., Gutt, J., et al., Eds.; Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research: Cambridge, UK, 2014; pp. 134–137. [Google Scholar]
  14. Barnes, D.K.A.; Downey, R.V. Chapter 5.23. Bryzoa. In Biogeographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean; De Broyer, C., Koubbi, P., Griffiths, H.J., Raymond, B., d’Udekem d’Acoz, C., Van de Putte, A.P., Danis, B., David, B., Grant, S., Gutt, J., et al., Eds.; Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research: Cambridge, UK, 2014; pp. 195–199. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ingels, J.; Hauquier, F.; Raes, M.; Vanreusel, A. Chapter, 5.3. Antarctic free-living marine nematodes. In Biogeographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean; De Broyer, C., Koubbi, P., Griffiths, H.J., Raymond, B., d’Udekem d’Acoz, C., Van de Putte, A.P., Danis, B., David, B., Grant, S., Gutt, J., et al., Eds.; Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research: Cambridge, UK, 2014; pp. 83–87. [Google Scholar]
  16. Soler-Membrives, A.; Munilla, T.; Arango, P.; Griffiths, H.J. Chapter 5.14. Southern Ocean biogeographic patterns in Pycnogonida. In Biogeographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean; De Broyer, C., Koubbi, P., Griffiths, H.J., Raymond, B., d’Udekem d’Acoz, C., Van de Putte, A.P., Danis, B., David, B., Grant, S., Gutt, J., et al., Eds.; Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research: Cambridge, UK, 2014; pp. 138–141. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kaiser, S. Chapter 5.18. Antarctic and sub-Antarctic Isopod Crustaceans (Peracarida: Malacostraca). In Biogeographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean; De Broyer, C., Koubbi, P., Griffiths, H.J., Raymond, B., d’Udekem d’Acoz, C., Van de Putte, A.P., Danis, B., David, B., Grant, S., Gutt, J., et al., Eds.; Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research: Cambridge, UK, 2014; pp. 166–172. [Google Scholar]
  18. Basher, Z.; Costello, M.J. Chapter 5.22. Shrimps (Crustacea: Decapoda). In Biogeographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean; De Broyer, C., Koubbi, P., Griffiths, H.J., Raymond, B., d’Udekem d’Acoz, C., Van de Putte, A.P., Danis, B., David, B., Grant, S., Gutt, J., et al., Eds.; Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research: Cambridge, UK, 2014; pp. 190–194. [Google Scholar]
  19. Griffiths, H.J.; Whittle, R.J.; Roberts, S.J.; Belchier, M.; Linse, K.; Thatje, S. Chapter 5.21. Decapoda: Crabs and Lobsters. In Biogeographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean; De Broyer, C., Koubbi, P., Griffiths, H.J., Raymond, B., d’Udekem d’Acoz, C., Van de Putte, A.P., Danis, B., David, B., Grant, S., Gutt, J., et al., Eds.; Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research: Cambridge, UK, 2014; pp. 185–189. [Google Scholar]
  20. Danis, B.; Griffiths, H.J.; Jangoux, M. Chapter 5.24. Asteroidea. In Biogeographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean; De Broyer, C., Koubbi, P., Griffiths, H.J., Raymond, B., d’Udekem d’Acoz, C., Van de Putte, A.P., Danis, B., David, B., Grant, S., Gutt, J., et al., Eds.; Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research: Cambridge, UK, 2014; pp. 200–207. [Google Scholar]
  21. Eléaume, M.; Hemery, L.G.; Roux, M.; Améziane, N. Chapter 5.25. Sothern Ocean Crinoids. In Biogeographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean; De Broyer, C., Koubbi, P., Griffiths, H.J., Raymond, B., d’Udekem d’Acoz, C., Van de Putte, A.P., Danis, B., David, B., Grant, S., Gutt, J., et al., Eds.; Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research: Cambridge, UK, 2014; pp. 208–212. [Google Scholar]
  22. Saucède, T.; Pierrat, B.; David, B. Chapter 5.26. Echinoids. In Biogeographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean; De Broyer, C., Koubbi, P., Griffiths, H.J., Raymond, B., d’Udekem d’Acoz, C., Van de Putte, A.P., Danis, B., David, B., Grant, S., Gutt, J., et al., Eds.; Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research: Cambridge, UK, 2014; pp. 213–220. [Google Scholar]
  23. De Broyer, C.; Jazdzeska, A. Biogeographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean; Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research: Cambridge, UK, 2014; 498p. [Google Scholar]
  24. Turner, J.; Bindschadler, R.; Convey, P.; Di Prisco, G.; Fahrbach, E.; Gutt, J.; Summerhayes, C. Antarctic climate change and the environment. Antarct. Sci. 2009, 21, 541–563. [Google Scholar]
  25. Peck, L.S.; Webb, K.E.; Bailey, D.M. Extreme sensitivity of biological function to temperature in Antarctic marine species. Funct. Ecol. 2004, 18, 625630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Carcelles, A. Catálogo de la Malacofauna Antártica Argentina. An. Mus. Nahuel Huapi 1953, 3, 155–250. [Google Scholar]
  27. Dell, R.K. Antarctic Mollusca: With Special Reference to the Fauna of the Ross Sea; Bulletin Royal Society of New Zealand Bulletin: Canberra, Australia, 1990; Volume 27, 311p. [Google Scholar]
  28. Engl, W. Shells of Antarctica; ConchBooks: Hackenheim, Germany, 2012; 402p. [Google Scholar]
  29. Martens, E.V.; Pfeffer, G. Die Mollusken von Süd-Georgien nach der Ausbeute der Deutschen Station 1882–83. Jahrb. Hambg. Wiss. Anst. 1886, 3, 63–135. [Google Scholar]
  30. Thiele, J. The Antarctic snails and mussels. In German South Polar Expedition 1901–1903; Scottish Geographical Magazine: Perth, Scotland, 1912; Volume 13, pp. 183–286. [Google Scholar]
  31. Melville, J.C.; Standen, R. The marine mollusca of the Scotish National Antarctic Expedition, Part II. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 1912, 48, 333–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Powell, A.W. B Antarctic and subantarctic Mollusca: Gastropoda and Pelecypoda. Discov. Repports 1951, 26, 47–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Powell, A.W.B. Antarctic and Subantarctic Mollusca. Rec. Auckl. Inst. Mus. 1960, 5, 117–193. [Google Scholar]
  34. Powell, A.W.B. Mollusca of Kerguelen and Macquarie Islands. Reports British, Australian, and New Zealand Antarctic Research Expedition (1929–1931). Ser. B Zool. Bot. 1957, 6, 107–149. [Google Scholar]
  35. Powell, A.W.B. Mollusca from the Victoria-Ross quadrants of Antarctica. Reports British, Australian, and New Zealand Antarctic Research Expedition (1929–1931). Ser. B Zool. Bot. 1958, 6, 165–215. [Google Scholar]
  36. Rochebrune, A.T.; Mabille, J. Mollusques Mission Scientifique du Cap Horn; Zoologie: Paris, France, 1889; Volume VI, 129p. [Google Scholar]
  37. Strebel, H. BeiträgezurKenntnis der Molluskenfauna der Magalhaen-Provinz III. Zoologische Jahrbucher Abteilung für Systematik, Geographie and Biologie, Jena 22, 575–666. 1905. Available online: https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/page/9987352 (accessed on 10 October 2024).
  38. Forcelli, D.O. Moluscos Magallánicos; Mazzini, V., Ed.; Zagier & Urruty Pubns: Buenos Aires, Argentina, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  39. Aldea, C.; Troncoso, J.S. Moluscos del Mar de Bellinghausen (Antártica); Cristian Aldea: Vigo, Spain, 2010; 250p. [Google Scholar]
  40. Spencer, H.G.; Marshall, B.A.; Willan, R.C. Checklist of New Zealand living Mollusca. In New Zealand Inventory of Biodiversity. Volume One. Kingdom Animalia: Radiata, Lophotrochozoa, Deuterostomia; Gordon, D.P., Ed.; Canterbury University Press: Christchurch, New Zealand, 2009; pp. 196–219. [Google Scholar]
  41. Spencer, H.G.; Willan, R.C.; Marshall, B.; Murray, T.J. Checklist of the Recent Mollusca Recorded from the New Zealand Exclusive Economic Zone. 2016. Available online: http://www.molluscs.otago.ac.nz/index.html (accessed on 10 October 2024).
  42. Grove, S. A Guide to the Seashells and Marine Molluscs of Tasmania. 2015. Available online: http://www.molluscsoftasmania.net/Speciespages/Crimoramultidigitalis.html (accessed on 10 October 2024).
  43. Linse, K.; Griffiths, H.J.; Barnes, D.K.; Clarke, A. Biodiversity and biogeography of Antarctic and sub-Antarctic mollusca. In Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2006; Volume 53, pp. 985–1008. [Google Scholar]
  44. Jörger, K.M.; Schrödl, M.; Schwabe, E.; Würzberg, L. A glimpse into the deep of the Antarctic Polar Front–Diversity and abundance of abyssal molluscs. In Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2014; Volume 108, pp. 93–100. [Google Scholar]
  45. Moreau, C.; Linse, K.; Griffiths, H.J.; Barnes, D.; Kaiser, S.; Glover, A.; Geissler, P. Amundsen Sea Mollusca from the BIOPEARL II expedition. ZooKeys 2013, 294, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Schiaparelli, S.; Ghiglione, C.; Alvaro, M.C.; Griffiths, H.J.; Linse, K. Diversity, abundance and composition in macrofaunal molluscs from the Ross Sea (Antarctica): Results of fine-mesh sampling along a latitudinal gradient. Polar Biol. 2014, 37, 859–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zelaya, D.G. Systematics and biogeography of marine gastropod molluscs from South Georgia. Spixiana 2005, 28, 109. [Google Scholar]
  48. Griffiths, H.J.; Linse, K.; Crame, J.A. SOMBASE–Southern Ocean Mollusc Database: A tool for biogeographic analysis in diversity and ecology. Org. Divers. Evol. 2003, 3, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Wägele, H.; Klusmann-Kolb, A. Opisthobranchia (Mollusca, Gastropoda)—More than just slimy slugs. Shell reduction and its implications on defence and foraging. Front. Zool. 2005, 2, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Bergh, R. Report on the Nudibranchiata. Chall. Rep. Zool. 1884, 10, 1–154. [Google Scholar]
  51. Pelseneer, P. Report on the Pteropoda collected by H.M.S. Challenger during the Years 1873–76. First Part.-Gymnosomata. Zoology 1887, LVIII, 19. [Google Scholar]
  52. Vayssière, A. Mollusques Nudibranches et Marséniadés. In Expédition Antarctique Française Commandée par le Dr. Jean Charcot (1903–1905); Sciences Naturelles: Documents Scientifiques, Mollusques, 1906b; pp. 1–51. [Google Scholar]
  53. Odhner, N.H. Die Opisthobranchien. In Further Zoological Results of the Sweedish Antarctic Expedition 1901–1903; P.A. Norstedt & Söner: Stockholm, Sweden, 1926; Volume 2, pp. 1–100. [Google Scholar]
  54. Marcus, E. Reports of the Lund University Chile Expedition 1948–49. In Lamellariacea und Opisthobranchia; Lunds University: Lund, Sweden, 1959; Volume 55, pp. 1–133. [Google Scholar]
  55. Burn, R. Opisthobranch molluscs from the Australian sub-Antarctic territories of Macquarie and Heard Islands. Proc. R. Soc. Vic. 1973, 86, 39–46. [Google Scholar]
  56. Vicente, N.; Arnaud, P.M. Invertebrés marins des XIIe et XVe Expéditions Antarctiques Francaises en Terre Adélie. 12. Gastéropodes Opisthobranches. Tethys 1974, 5, 531–547. [Google Scholar]
  57. Cattaneo-Vietti, R. Nudibranch Molluscs from the Ross Sea, Antarctica. J. Molluscan Stud. 1991, 57 (Suppl. S4), 223–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Castellanos, Z.A.; Landoni, N.A.; Dadon, J.R. Catálogo Descriptivo de la Malacofauna Marina Magallánica 12: Opisthobranchia Excepto nudibranchida Y Pulmonata; Comisión de Investigaciones Científicas: Buenos Aires, Argentina, 1993; pp. 1–299. [Google Scholar]
  59. Dadon, J.R.; Chauvin, S.F. Distribution and abundance of Gymnosomata (Gastropoda: Opisthobranchia) in the Southwest Atlantic. J. Molluscan Stud. 1998, 64, 345–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Cárdenas, J.; Aldea, C.; Valdovinos, C. Chilean marine mollusca of northern Patagonia collected during the CIMAR-10 Fjords Cruise. Gayana 2008, 72, 202–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Hunt, B.P.V.; Pakhomov, E.A.; Hosie, G.W.; Siegel, V.; Ward, P.; Bernard, K. Pteropods in Southern Ocean ecosystems. Prog. Oceanogr. 2008, 78, 193–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Minichev, Y.S. Opisthobranchiate molluscs of the Davis Sea. Issled. Fauny Morei 1972, 11, 358–382. [Google Scholar]
  63. Schrödl, M. Sea Slugs of Southern South America: Systematics, Biogeography and Biology of Chilean and Magellanic Nudipleura (Mollusca—Opisthobranchia); ConchBooks: Hackenheim, Germany, 2003; 165p. [Google Scholar]
  64. Troncoso, J.S.; García, F.J.; García, J.F. Gastropoda Opisthobranchia colected during the Spanish expeditions to the Scotia Sea. Thalassas 1997, 13, 11–33. [Google Scholar]
  65. Gilmer, R.W.; Lalli, C.M. Bipolar variation in Clione, a gymnosomatous pteropod. Am. Malacol. Bull. 1990, 8, 67–75. [Google Scholar]
  66. Clark, K.B. Nudibranch life cycles in the Northwest Atlantic and their relationship to the ecology of fouling communities. Helgoländer Wiss. Meeresunters. 1975, 27, 28–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Todd, C.D. The ecology of nudibranch molluscs. In Oceanography and Marine Biology: An Annual Review; Barnes, H.B., Ed.; Aberdeen University Press: London, UK, 1981; Volume 19, pp. 141–234. [Google Scholar]
  68. Cimino, G.; Ghiselin, M.T. Chemical Defense and Evolution of Opisthobranch Gastropods; California Academy of Sciences: San Francisco, CA, USA, 2009; 247p. [Google Scholar]
  69. Johnson, P.M.; Willows, A. Defense in sea hares (Gastropoda, Opisthobranchia, Anaspidea) multiple layers of protection from egg to adult. Mar. Freshw. Behav. Physiol. 1999, 32, 147–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Wägele, H.; Ballesteros, M.; Avila, C. Defensive glandular structures in opisthobranch molluscs: From histology to ecology. Oceanogr. Mar. Ecol. 2006, 44, 197–276. [Google Scholar]
  71. Edmunds, M. Protective mechanisms in the Eolidacea (Mollusca, Nudibranchia). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 1966, 46, 27–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. de Vries, J.; Christa, G.; Gould, S.B. Plastid survival in the cytosol of animal cells. Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 19, 347–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Wahidullah, S.; Guo, Y.W.; Fakhr, I.M.I.; Mollo, E. Chemical diversity in opisthobranch molluscs from scarcely investigated Indo-Pacific areas. In Progress in Molecular and Subcellular Biology. Molluscs; Cimino, G., Gavagnin, M., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2006; pp. 175–198. [Google Scholar]
  74. Nimbs, M.J.; Smith, S.D.A. Revision of the southern distribution limit for the tropical marine herbivore Syphonota geographica (A. Adams & Reeve, 1850) (Heterobranchia: Aplysiidae) in a global climate change hot-spot. Aust. Zool. 2017, 38, 582–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Nimbs, M.J.; Willan, R.C.; Smith, S.D.A. An historical summary of the distribution and diet of the Australian sea hares (Gastropoda: Heterobranchia: Aplysiidae). Zool. Stud. 2017, 56, e35. [Google Scholar]
  76. Zhuo, J.; Gill, J.P.; Jansen, E.D.; Jenkins, M.W.; Chiel, H.J. Use of an invertebrate animal mode (Aplysia californica) to develop novel neural interfaces for neuromodulation. Front. Neurosci. 2022, 16, 1080027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Australian Antarctic Data Centre. Occurrence Data Set. 2024. Available online: https://data.aad.gov.au/aadc/biodiversity/ (accessed on 4 September 2024).
  78. Carcelles, A.R.; Williamson, S.I. Catálogo de los moluscos marinos de la provincia magallánica. Rev. Del Inst. Nac. De Investig. De Cienc. Nat. Cienc. Zool. 1951, 2, 225–383. [Google Scholar]
  79. Castellanos, Z.A.; Bartolotta, S.; Rolán, E. Aportes a la malacofauna del talud superior del Atlántico Sur. Thalassas 1987, 5, 57–70. [Google Scholar]
  80. Castellanos, Z.A.; Rolán, E.; Bartolotta, S. Nuevos micromoluscos de la plataforma inferior Argentina y talud superior (Moll. Gastropoda). Rev. Mus. Plata Zool. 1987, 14, 93–107. [Google Scholar]
  81. Linse, K. Mollusca of the Magellan region. A checklist of the species and their distribution. Sci. Mar. 1999, 63 (Suppl. SI), 399–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Muniain, C.; Ortea, J.A. First records of the genus Berghia Trinchese, 1877 (Opisthobranchia: Aeolidiidae) from Argentina, with description of a new species. Avicennia 1999, 10, 143–150. [Google Scholar]
  83. Valdés, Á.; Munian, C. Revision and taxonomic reassessment of magellanic species assigned to Anisodoris Bergh, 1898 (Nudibranchia: Doridoidea). J. Molluscan Stud. 2002, 68, 345–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Price, R.M.; Gosliner, T.M.; Valdés, A. Systematics and phylogeny of Philine (Gastropoda: Opisthobranchia), with emphasis on the Philine aperta species complex. The Veliger 2011, 51, 1–58. [Google Scholar]
  85. Rosenfeld, S.; Aldea, C. An unknown opisthobranch (Mollusca: Gastropoda) in the Magellan region. Toledonia parelata Dell, 1990: New records and similar species. An. Inst. Patagon. 2011, 39, 133–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zelaya, D.G.; Schejter, L.; Ituarte, C. Neacteonina argentina, new species, and family placement of the genus Neacteonina Thiele, 1912 (Mollusca: Gastropoda). Malacologia 2011, 53, 251–263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Valdés, A.; McLean, J. On two abyssal species of Scaphandridae G.O. Sars, 1878 (Gastropoda: Cephalaspidea) from the eastern Pacific. Naut. 2015, 129, 118–125. [Google Scholar]
  88. Salvador, R.B.; Cunha, C. Lanayrella, a new Acteonidae genus (Gastropoda, Heterobranchia) from Tierra del Fuego. J. Nat. Hist. 2020, 54, 1009–1018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Schrödl, M. The genus Berthella Blainville, 1825 (Notaspidea: Pleurobranchidae) from Magellanic waters. J. Molluscan Stud. 1999a, 65, 399409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Schrödl, M. Zoogeographic relationships of Magellan Nudibranchia (Mollusca: Opisthobranchia) with particular reference to species from adjacent regions. Sci. Mar. 1999b, 63, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Schrödl, M.; Alarcón, M.A.; Bedriñana, L.R.; Bravo, F.J.; Bustamante, C.M.; Carvalho, R.; Forsterra, G.; Gallardo, C.; Haussermann, V.; Salmen, A. Nudipleura from the southern Chilean Comau Fjord with redescription of Polycera priva Er. Marcus, 1959. Vita Malacol. 2005, 3, 23–33. [Google Scholar]
  92. Schrödl, M.; Grau, J. Nudibranchia from the remote southern Chilean Guamblin and Ipún Islands (Chonos Archipelago, 44°–45° S), with re-description of Rostanga pulchra MacFarland, 1905. Rev. Chil. Hist. Nat. 2006, 79, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Eliot, C.N.E. Nudibranchs from New Zealand and the Falkland Islands. Proc. Malacol. Soc. Lond. 1907b, 7, 327–361. [Google Scholar]
  94. Strebel, H. Die Gastropoden. Wissenschaftliche Ergebnisse der Schwedischen Südpolar Expedition: 1901–1903; Lithographisches institute des Generalstabs: Stockholm, Sweden, 1908; Volume 6, pp. 1–112. [Google Scholar]
  95. Seager, J.R. A Redescription of the Antarctic opisthobranch Piline gibba Strebel, 1908 from the type locality, South Georgia, South Atlantic. J. Molluscan Stud. 1978, 44, 171–179. [Google Scholar]
  96. García, F.J.; Troncoso, J.S.; García-Gómez, J.C.; Cervera, J.L. Anatomical and taxonomical studies of the Antarctic nudibranchs Austrodoris kerguelenensis (Bergh, 1884) and A. georgiensis n. sp. from the Scotia Sea. Polar Biol. 1993, 13, 417–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Schrödl, M. Revision of the nudibranch genus Cadlina (Gastropoda: Opisthobranchia) from the Southern Ocean. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. UK 2000a, 80, 299–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Schächinger, P.M.; Schrödl, M.; Wilson, N.G.; Moles, J. Crossing the Polar Front-Antarctic species discovery in the nudibranch genus Tritoniella (Gastropoda). Org. Divers. Evol. 2022, 22, 431–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Eliot, C.N.E. The Nudibranchiata of the Scottish National Antarctic Expedition. Trans. R. Soc. Edinb. 1905, 41, 519–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wägele, H.; Barnes, D.K.; Bullough, L.W. Redescription of Charcotia granulosa Vayssiere, 1906 (Nudibranchia: Arminoidea: Charcotiidae) from Signy Island, Antarctica. J. Molluscan Stud. 1995, 61, 197–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Willan, R.C.; Bertsch, H. Description of a new Pleurobranch (Opisthobranchia, Notaspidea) from Antarctic waters, with a review of Notaspideans from Southern Polar Seas. Veliger 1987, 29, 292–302. [Google Scholar]
  102. Schrödl, M.; Engl, W.; Aldea, C.; Kohlberg, G.; Schories, D. Gastropods, Gastropoda. In Marine wildlife, King George Island, Antarctica; Schories, D., Kohlberg, G., Eds.; Dirk Schories Publications: Cologne, Germany, 2016; pp. 128–153. [Google Scholar]
  103. Peralta-Serrano, M.; Schrödl, M.; Wilson, N.G.; Moles, J. Revealing hidden diversity and cryptic speciation in Antarctic marine gastropods (Heterobranchia: Cephalaspidea). Antarct. Sci. 2025, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Watson, R.B. Mollusca of H.M.S. “Challenger” Expedition. Part XVIII. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. Zool. 1883, 17, 284–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Vicente, N. Nudibranches des Îles Kerguelen. Tethys 1973, 5, 629–634. [Google Scholar]
  106. Wägele, H. On the Anatomy and Zoogeography of Tritoniella belli Eliot, 1907 (Opisthobranchia, Nudibranchia) and athe synonymy of T. sinuata Eliot, 1907. Polar Biol. 1989, 9, 235–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Troncoso, N.; Van Goethem, J.; Troncoso, J.S. Contribution to the marine molluscan fauna of Kerguelen Islands, South Indian Ocean. Iberus 2001, 19, 83–114. [Google Scholar]
  108. Ballesteros, M.; Avila, C. A new tritoniid species (Mollusca: Opisthobranchia) from Bouvet Island. Polar Biol. 2006, 29, 128–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Linse, K. New records of shelled marine molluscs at Bouvet Island and preliminary assessment of their biogeographic affinities. Polar Biol. 2006, 29, 120127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Moles, J.; Wägele, H.; Ballesteros, M.; Pujals, A.; Uhl, G.; Àvila, C. The end of the cold loneliness: 3D comparison between Doto antarctica and a new sympatric species of Doto (Heterobranchia: Nudibranchia). PLoS ONE 2016a, 11, e0157941. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Moles, J.; Wägele, H.; Uhl, G.; Avila, C. Bipolarity in sea slugs: A new species of Doridunculus (Mollusca: Nudibranchia: Onchidoridoidea) from Antarctica. Org. Divers. Evol. 2016b, 17, 101–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Branch, M.L.; Arnaud, P.M.; Cantera, J.; Gianakouras, D. The Benthic Mollusca and Brachiopoda of Subantarctic Marion and Prince Edward Islands: 1) Illustrated Keys to the Species 2) Records of the 1982–1989 University of Cape Town Surveys. South Afr. J. Antarct. Res. 1991, 21, 45–64. [Google Scholar]
  113. Powell, A.W.B. Mollusca of the southern islands of New Zealand, Cape Expedition, 1941–1945. Dep. Sci. Ind. Res. Cape Exped. Ser. Bull. 1955, 15, 1–151. [Google Scholar]
  114. Merilees, W.; Burn, R. Archidoris kerguelenensis Bergh, the first record of a nudibranch from Macquarie Island. Victorian Nat. 1969, 86, 137–138. [Google Scholar]
  115. Phillips, J.A. Marine macroalgal biodiversity hotspots: Why is there high species richness and endemism in southern Australian marine benthic flora? Biodivers. Conserv. 2001, 10, 1555–1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Butler, A.J.; Rees, T.; Beesley, P.; Bax, N.J. Marine Biodiversity in the Australian Region. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, e11831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  117. Tenison Woods, J.E. Census; with brief descriptions of the marine shells of Tasmania and the adjacent islands. Pap. Proc. Rep. R. Soc. Tasman. 1877, 26–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Tate, R.; May, W.L. A revised census of the marine Mollusca of Tasmania. Proc. Linn. Soc. N. S. Wales 1901, 26, 344–471. [Google Scholar]
  119. May, W.L. A Check-List of the Mollusca of Tasmania; John Vail, Governements Printer: Hobart, Australia, 1921; 114p. [Google Scholar]
  120. Kershaw, R.C. A systematic list of the Mollusca of Tasmania, Australia. Pap. Proc. R. Soc. Tasman. 1955, 89, 289–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Grove, S.J.; Kershaw, R.C.; Smith, B.J.; Turner, E. A Systematic List of the Marine Molluscs of Tasmania; Queen Victoria Museum and Art Gallery: Launceston, Australia, 2006; Volume 8, 122p. [Google Scholar]
  122. Grove, S. An Annotated Checklist of Tasmanian Marine Molluscs; Tasmanian Museum and Art Gallery: Hobart, Tasmania, Australia, 2018; 82p. [Google Scholar]
  123. Richmond, M.H. Tasmanian Sea Shells; Richmond Printers: Devonport, Tasmania, Australia, 1992; Volume 2, 111p. [Google Scholar]
  124. Beesley, P.; Ross, G.; Wells, A. Mollusca: The Southern Synthesis; Australian Biological Resources, CSIRO Publishing: Melbourne, Australia, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  125. Bergh, R. Chapter 6. Malacologische Untersuchungen. In Reisen im Archipel der Philippinen von Dr. Carl Gottfried Semper; Zweiter Theil. Wissenschaftliche Resultate; Forgotten Books: London, UK, 1904; Volume 9, pp. 1–56. [Google Scholar]
  126. Bergh, R. Die Opisthobranchiata der Siboga-Expedition; Siboga-Expeditie; Wentworth Press: London, UK, 1905; Volume 50, pp. 1–248. [Google Scholar]
  127. Burn, R. A checklist and bibliography of the Opisthobranchia (Mollusca: Gastropoda) of Victoria and the Bass Strait area, south-eastern Australia. Mus. Vic. Sci. Rep. 2006, 10, 1–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Dayrat, B. A monographic revision of basal discodorid sea slugs (Gastropoda, Opisthobranchia, Nudibranchia, Doridina). Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 2010, 61 (Suppl. SI), 1–403. [Google Scholar]
  129. MolluscaBase eds. MolluscaBase. Paradoris dubia (Bergh, 1904). 2025a. World Register of Marine Species. Available online: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=533981 (accessed on 5 April 2025).
  130. Johnson, R.F.; Gosliner, T.M. Traditional taxonomic groupings mask evolutionary history: A molecular phylogeny and new classification of the chromodorid nudibranchs. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e33479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. MolluscaBase. (Ed.) MolluscaBase. Aphelodoris luctuosa Bergh, 1905. 2025b. World Register of Marine Species. Available online: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1732011 (accessed on 5 April 2025).
  132. Rudman, W.B. Aeolid opisthobranch molluscs (Glaucidae) from the Indian Ocean and the south-west Pacific. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 1980, 68, 139–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Rudman, W.B. The Chromodorididae (Opisthobranchia: Mollusca) of the Indo-West Pacific: A review of the genera. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 1984, 81, 115–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Rudman, W.B. The Chromodorididae (Opisthobranchia: Mollusca) of the Indo-West Pacific: The genus Glossodoris Ehrenbergh (= Casella, H. & A. Adams). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 1986, 86, 101–184. [Google Scholar]
  135. Rudman, W.B. The Chromodorididae (Opisthobranchia: Mollusca) of the Indo-West Pacific: The genus Ceratosoma JE Gray. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 1988, 93, 133–185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. MolluscaBase eds. MolluscaBase. Verconia aureopunctata (Rudman, 1987). 2025f. World Register of Marine Species. Available online: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=866650 (accessed on 8 April 2025).
  137. MolluscaBase eds. MolluscaBase. Verconia closeorum (Rudman, 1986). 2025g. World Register of Marine Species. Available online: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=866652 (accessed on 4 April 2025).
  138. Bowen, M.M.; Wilkin, J.L.; Emery, W.J. Variability and forcing of the East Australian Current. J. Geophys. Res. Ocean. 2005, 110, C03019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Ridgway, K.; Hill, K. The East Australian Current. In A Marine Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Report Card for Australia; Poloczanska, E.S., Hobday, A.J., Richardson, A.J., Eds.; NCCARF Publication: Gold Coast, Australia, 2009. [Google Scholar]
  140. Suthers, I.M.; Young, J.W.; Baird, M.E.; Roughan, M.; Everett, J.D.; Brassington, G.B.; Byrne, M.; Condie, S.A.; Hartog, J.R.; Hassler, C.S. The strengthening East Australian Current, its eddies and biological effects—An introduction and overview. In Deep Sea Research Part II: Topical Studies in Oceanography; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2011; Volume 58, pp. 538–546. [Google Scholar]
  141. Cresswell, G.R.; Peterson, J.L.; Pender, L.F. The East Australian Current, upwellings and downwellings off eastern-most Australia in summer. Mar. Freshw. Res. 2016, 68, 1208–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Pitt, N.R.; Poloczanska, E.S.; Hobday, A.J. Climate-driven range changes in Tasmanian intertidal fauna. Mar. Freshw. Res. 2010, 61, 963–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Ramos, J.E.; Pecl, G.T.; Semmens, J.M.; Strugnell, J.M.; León, R.I.; Moltschaniwskyj, N.A. Reproductive capacity of a marine species (Octopus tetricus) within a recent range extension area. Mar. Freshw. Res. 2015, 66, 999–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Nimbs, M.J.; Larkin, M.; Davis, T.R.; Harasti, D.; Willan, R.C.; Smith, S.D.A. Southern range extensions for twelve heterobranch sea slugs (Gastropoda: Heterobranchia) on the eastern coast of Australia. Mar. Biodivers. Rec. 2016, 9, 27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Nimbs, M.J.; Willan, R.C.; Smith, S.D.A. Range extensions for heterobranch sea slugs (formerly opisthobranch) belonging to the families Diaphanidae, Plakobranchidae and Facelinidae on the eastern coast of Australia. Mar. Biodivers. Rec. 2015, 8, e76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Nimbs, M.J.; Smith, S.D.A. Welcome strangers: Southern range extensions for seven heterobranch sea slugs (Mollusca: Gastropoda) on the subtropical east Australian coast, a climate change hot spot. Reg. Stud. Mar. Sci. 2016, 8, 27–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Nimbs, M.J.; Smith, S.D.A. An illustrated inventory of the sea slugs of New South Wales, Australia (Gastropoda: Heterobranchia). Proc. R. Soc. Vic. 2017, 128, 44–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Nimbs, M.J.; Smith, S. Beyond Capricornia: Tropical Sea Slugs (Gastropoda, Heterobranchia) Extend Their Distributions into the Tasman Sea. Diversity 2018, 10, 99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Smith, S.D.A.; Nimbs, M.J. Citizen Scientists Record Significant Range Extensions for Tropical Sea Slug Species in Subtropical Eastern Australia. Diversity 2022, 14, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Grove, S. The Seashells of Tasmania: A Comprehensive Guide; Taroona Publications: Hobart, Australia, 2011; 82p. [Google Scholar]
  151. Suter, H. Manual of the New Zealand Mollusca with an Atlas of Quarto Plates; John Mackay, Government Printer: Wellington, New Zealand, 1913; 1120p. [Google Scholar]
  152. Powell, A.W.B. New Zealand Mollusca. Marine, Land and Freshwater Shells; William Collins Publishers: Auckland, New Zealand, 1979; 500p. [Google Scholar]
  153. Spencer, H.J.; Willan, R.C. The Marine Fauna of New Zealand: Index to the Fauna 3. Mollusca. N. Z. Oceanogr. Inst. Mem. 1996, 105, 126. [Google Scholar]
  154. Cheeseman, T. On a new genus of Opisthobranchiate Mollusca. In Transactions and Proceedings of the Royal Society of New Zealand; The Society: Burlington, ON, Canada, 1881; Volume 13, p. 224. [Google Scholar]
  155. Rang, S. Histoire naturelle des Aplysiens, première famille de l’ordre des Tectibranches. In Histoire Naturelle, Generale et Particuliere des Mollusques; Arthur Bertrand Libraire: Paris, France, 1828; Volume 1. [Google Scholar]
  156. Abraham, P.S. Notes on some genera of nudibranchiate Mollusca, with notices of a new genus and some hitherto undescribed species, in the collection of the British Museum. Ann. Mag. Nat. Hist. 1876, 18, 132–146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Hutton, F.W. Manual of the New Zealand Mollusca: A Systematic and Descriptive Catalogue of the Marine and Land Shells, and of the Soft Mollusks and Polyzoa of New Zealand and the Adjacent Islands; Dominium Museum: Wellington, New Zealand, 1880. [Google Scholar]
  158. Eliot, C.N.E. Notes on some new or little-known members of the family Dorididae. J. Molluscan Stud. 1903, 5, 331–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Suter, H. Description of new species and subspecies of New Zealand Mollusca, with notes on a few species. Proc. Malacol. Soc. Lond. 1909, 8, 253–265. [Google Scholar]
  160. Challis, D.A. New species of Pseudovermis (Opisthobranchia: Aeolidacea) from New Zealand and the Solomon Islands. Trans. R. Soc. New Zealand 1969, 11, 153–165. [Google Scholar]
  161. Miller, M.C. Aeolid nudibranchs (Gastropoda: Opisthobranchia) of the family Tergipedidae from New Zealand waters. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 1977, 60, 197–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Willan, R.C.; Morton, J. Marine Molluscs, Part 2; Opisthobranchia; University of Auckland, Leigh Marine Laboratory: Auckland, New Zealand, 1984; 106p. [Google Scholar]
  163. Willan, R.C.; Davey, N. Super Sea Slugs, a Guide to the Sea Slugs of New Zealand, Version 1, 52. 2020. Available online: http://www.niwa.co.nz/coasts-and-oceans/marine-identification-guides-and-fact-sheets (accessed on 13 September 2024).
  164. Vayssière, A. Diagnoses of new generic gastropod molluscs reported by Dr. Charcot Antarctic Expedition. Nat. Hist. Mus. Paris 1906a, 1, 47–149. [Google Scholar]
  165. Vayssière, A. Recherches Zoologiques et Anatomiques sur les Mollusques Amphineures et Gastéropodes (Opisthobranches et Prosobranches). Deuxieme Expédition Antarctique Française (1908–1910) Commandee par le Dr. Jean Charcot, Documents Scientifiques, Paris, France. 1917, pp. 1–44. Available online: https://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/6956 (accessed on 26 April 2025).
  166. Eliot, C.N.E. Mollusca IV—Nudibranchiata. National Antarctic Expedition 1901–1904; British Museum (Natural History): London, UK, 1907a; Volume 2, pp. 1–28. [Google Scholar]
  167. Eliot, C.N.E. The Nudibranchiata of the Scottish National Antarctic Expedition. In Report of the Scientific Results of the Voyage of S. Y. “Scotia” During the Years 1902, 1903, and 1904, Under the Leadership of William S. Bruce; Scottish Oceanographical Laboratory: Edinburgh, Scotland, 1909; Volume V, pp. 11–24. [Google Scholar]
  168. Hedley, C. Australasian Antarctic Expedition 1911–1914. Sci. Rep. Ser. C. Zool. Bot. 1916, IV, 1–80. [Google Scholar]
  169. Odhner, N.H. The Nudibranchata, British Antarctic ‘Terra Nova’ expedition, 1910. Br. Mus. Nat. Hist. Rep. Zool. 1934, 7, 229–310. [Google Scholar]
  170. Brueggeman, P.; Wu, N.; Bosch, I.; Bowser, S. Underwater Field Guide to Ross Island & McMurdo Sound, Antarctica; Scripps Institution of Oceanography Library: San Diego, CA, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  171. Valdés, Á.; Moran, A.L.; Woods, H.A. A new species of Armodoris (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Nudibranchia, Akiodorididae) from McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. Polar Biol. 2011, 34, 459–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Valdés, Á.; Moran, A.L.; Woods, H.A. Revision of several poorly known Antarctic aeolid nudibranch species (Mollusca: Gastropoda), with the description of a new species. J. Mar. Biol. Assoc. 2012, 92, 1161–1174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Hain, S. Die beschalten benthischen Mollusken (Gastropoda und Bivalvia) des Weddellmeeres, Antarktis. Berichte Zur Polarforsch. 1990, 70, 1–181. [Google Scholar]
  174. Wägele, H. Revision of the Antarctic genus Notaeolidia (Gastropoda, Nudibranchia), with a description of a new species. Zool. Scr. 1990a, 19, 309–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Wägele, H. Revision of the genus Austrodoris Odhner, 1926 (Gastropoda, Opisthobranchia). J. Molluscan Stud. 1990b, 56, 163–180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Troncoso, J.S.; García, F.J.; Backeljau, T.; Urgorri, V. Faunistic and anatomical data on the Antarctic Opisthobranchia (Mollusca, Gastropoda) in the collections of the Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences. Bull. Inst. R. Sci. Nat. Belg. Biol. 1996, 66, 29–40. [Google Scholar]
  177. Troncoso, J.S.; García García, F.J.; García Gómez, J.C.; Ballesteros, M. Moluscos Opistobranquios capturados durante las Expediciones Españolas BENTART 94 y 95, ampliando la distribución y rango batimétrico de Bathydoris hodgsoni. Nova Acta Compostel 1999, 9, 321–323. [Google Scholar]
  178. Millen, S.; Martynov, A.V. Redescriptions of the nudibranch genera Akiodoris Bergh, 1879 and Armodoris Minichev, 1972 (Suborder Doridacea) with a new species of Akiodoris and a new family Akiodorididae. Proc. Calif. Acad. Sci. 2005, 56, 1–22. [Google Scholar]
  179. Aldea, C.; Olabarria, C.; Troncoso, J.S. Bathymetric zonation and diversity gradient of gastropods and bivalves in West Antarctica from the South Shetland Islands to the Bellingshausen Sea. In Deep-Sea Research Part I: Oceanographic Research Papers; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2008; Volume 55, pp. 350–368. [Google Scholar]
  180. Aldea, C.; Troncoso, J.S. Systematic and distribution of shelled mollusks (Gastropoda, Bivalvia and Scaphopoda) from the South Shetland Island to the Bellingshausen Sea, West Antarctica. Iberus 2008, 26, 43–117. [Google Scholar]
  181. Martynov, A.V. Archaic Tergipedidae of the Arctic and Antarctic: Murmania antiqua gen. et sp. nov. from the Barents Sea and a revision of the genus Guyvalvoria Vayssière with descriptions of two new species. Ruthenica 2006, 16, 73–88. [Google Scholar]
  182. Rauschert, M.; Arntz, W. Antarctic Macrobenthos: A field Guide of the Invertebrates Living at the Antarctic Seafloor; Druckerei Girzig+ Gottschalk GmbH: Bremen, Germany, 2015; 143p. [Google Scholar]
  183. Smith, E.A. Report on the Collections of Natural History made in the Antarctic regions during the Voyage of the Southern Cross. VII Mollusca; British Museum: London, UK, 1902; Volume 24–25, pp. 201–2013. [Google Scholar]
  184. Van der Spoel, S.; Schalk, P.H.; Bleeker, J. Clio piatkowskii, a mesopelagic pteropod new to science (Gastropoda, Opisthobranchia). Beaufortia 1992, 43, 1–6. [Google Scholar]
  185. Würzberg, L.; Peters, J.; Schwabe, E.; Rodkina, S.; Brandt, A. Pteropods (Gastropoda: Opisthobranchia) in the Southern Ocean: First results from fatty acid and stable isotope analyses on the SYSTCO material. ICES CM/A:16 2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Troncoso, J.S.; Aldea, C. Macrobenthic mollusc assemblages and diversity in the West Antarctica from the South Shetland Islands to the Bellingshausen Sea. Polar Biol. 2008, 31, 1253–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  187. Aldea, C.; Olabarria, C.; Troncoso, J.S. Spatial patterns of benthic diversity in molluscs from West Antarctica. Antarct. Sci. 2009, 21, 341–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  188. Marcus, E. A toxonomic survey of the genus. Toledonia (Opisthobranchia, Diaphanidae). Zool. Scr. 1976, 5, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Romani, L.; Rolán, E.; Simone, L.R.L.; Crocetta, F. Emarginula poppeorum and Acteon fasuloi: Replacement names for the preoccupied taxa Emarginula gigantea Poppe, 2008 and Acteon elongatus Castellanos, Rolán & Bartolotta, 1987 (Mollusca: Gastropoda). Zootaxa 2017, 4300, 149–150. [Google Scholar]
  190. Dall, W.H. Illustrations and descriptions of new, unfigured, or imperfectly known shells, chiefly American in the US National Museum. Proc. United States Natl. Mus. 1902, 24, 499–566. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Wägele, H.; Willan, E.C. The morphology and anatomy of the Antarctic gastropod Bathyberthella antarctica (Opisthobranchia, Notaspidea, Pleurobranchidae). Zool. Scr. 1994, 23, 313–324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Garcia, F.J.; García-Gómez, J.C.; Troncoso, J.S.; Cervera, J.L. A descriptive study of some antarctic notaspidean opisthobanchs (Gastropoda) with a description of a new genus and species. Polar Biol. 1994, 14, 261–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Ghiglione, C.; Alvaro, M.C.; Piazza, P.; Bowden, D.; Griffiths, H.J.; Carota, C.; Nava, C.R.; Schiaparelli, S. Mollusc species richness from shelf to abyssal depths in the Ross Sea (Antarctica): Results from the New Zealand IPY-CAML expedition and implications for future sampling. Polar Biol. 2017, 40, 1989–2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  194. García, F.J.; Troncoso, J.S.; Cervera, J.L.; García-Gómez, J.C. Description of the Antarctic notaspidean Polictenidia tomasi n. g. and n. sp. (Gastropoda, Opisthobranchia) from the Scotia Sea, proposing also a new notaspidean tribe. Polar Biol. 1996, 16, 79–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Menacho, A. Redescripción y Distribución Geográfica de Especies de Gasterópodos Antárticos de los Géneros Marseniopsis Bergh, 1886 y Bathyberthella Willan, 1983. Master’s Thesis, Universidad de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain, 2011; 37p. [Google Scholar]
  196. Wägele, H.; Hain, S. Description of a new notaspidean genus and species (Opisthobranchia: Notaspidea) from the Antarctic Ocean. J. Molluscan Stud. 1991, 57 (Suppl. S4), 229–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  197. Muniain, C.; Ardila, N.E.; Cervera, J.L. Pleurobranchaea inconspicua Bergh, 1897 (Opisthobranchia: Pleurobranchidae): Redescription and distribution from Argentina and Colombia. Bonn. Zool. Beiträge 2007, 55, 291–300. [Google Scholar]
  198. Marcus, E.; Gosliner, T.M. Review of the family Pleurobranchaeidae (Mollusca, Opisthobranchia). Ann. S. Afr. Mus. 1984, 93, 1–41. [Google Scholar]
  199. Battini, N.; Giachetti, C.B.; Castro, K.L.; Bartolus, A.; Schwindt, E. New invasive predator reduces the abundance of native prey in a cold-temperate marine fouling community. Aquat. Conserv. Mar. Freshw. Ecosyst. 2021, 31, 2842–2854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Farias, N.E.; Obenat, S.; Goya, A.B. Outbreak of a neurotoxic side-gilled sea slug (Pleurobranchaea sp.) in Argentinian coasts. New Zealand J. Zool. 2015, 42, 51–56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Wägele, H. The distribution of some Antarctic nudibranchs (Opisthobranchia). J. Molluscan Stud. 1987, 53, 179–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Ghiglione, C.; Alvaro, M.C.; Griffiths, H.J.; Linse, K.; Schiaparelli, S. Ross Sea Mollusca from the latitudinal gradient program: R/V Italica 2004 Rauschert dredge samples. ZooKey 2013, 341, 37–48. [Google Scholar]
  203. Aldea, C.; Césped, T.; Rosenfeld, S. Sea slugs from Bernardo O’Higgings National Park (S. Chile). Thalassas 2021, 27, 37–48. [Google Scholar]
  204. Cattaneo-Vietti, R.; Chiantore, M.; Schiaparelli, S.; Albertelli, G. Shallow- and deep-water mollusc distribution at Terra Nova Bay (Ross Sea, Antarctica). Polar Biol. 2000, 23, 173–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. Schiaparelli, S.; Linse, K. Chapter 5.10. Gastropoda. In Biogeographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean; De Broyer, C., Koubbi, P., Griffiths, H.J., Raymond, B., d’Udekem d’Acoz, C., Van de Putte, A.P., Danis, B., David, B., Grant, S., Gutt, J., et al., Eds.; Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research: Cambridge, UK, 2014; pp. 122–125. [Google Scholar]
  206. Paz-Sedano, S.; Moles, J.; Smirnoff, D.; Gosliner, T.M.; Pola, M. A combined phylogenetic strategy illuminates the evolution of Goniodorididae nudibranchs (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Heterobranchia). Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2024, 192, 107990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  207. Paz-Sedano, S.; Smirnoff, D.; Gosliner, T.M.; Pola, M. When a genus must become two: Resurrection of Pelagella Gray, 1850 with the description of six new species. J. Molluscan Stud. 2023, 89, eyad008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  208. Pontes, M. “Polycera Hedgpethi” in OPK-Opistobranquis. 2023. Available online: http://opistobranquis.info/en/?p=14413 (accessed on 5 May 2024).
  209. Bergh, R. Die Opisthobranchier der Sammlung Plate. Zool. Jahrbücher Suppl. 1898, 4, 481–582. [Google Scholar]
  210. Barnes, D.K.; Bullough, L.W. Some observations on the diet and distribution of nudibranchs at Signy Island, Antarctica. J. Molluscan Stud. 1996, 62, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Arnaud, P.M.; Troncoso, J.S.; Ramos, A. Species diversity and assemblage of macrobenthic Mollusca from the South Shetland Islands and Bransfield Strait (Antarctica). Polar Biol. 2001, 24, 105–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  212. Dayton, P.K.; Robilliard, G.A.; Paine, R.T.; Dayton, L.B. Biological accommodation in the benthic community at McMurdo Sound, Antarctica. Ecol. Monogr. 1974, 44, 105–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  213. Schiaparelli, S.; Lorz, A.N.; Cattaneo-Vietti, R. Diversity and distribution of mollusk assemblages on the Victoria Land coast and the Balleny Islands, Ross Sea, Antarctica. Antarct. Sci. 2006, 18, 615–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  214. Wilson, N.G.; Schrödl, M.; Halanych, K.M. Ocean barriers and glaciation: Evidence for explosive radiation of mitochondrial lineages in the Antarctic sea slug Doris kerguelenensis (Mollusca, Nudibranchia). Mol. Ecol. 2009, 18, 965–984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  215. Maroni, P.J.; Wilson, N.G. Multiple Doris “kerguelenensis” (Nudibranchia) species span the Antarctic Polar Front. Ecol. Evol. 2022, 12, e9333. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  216. Maroni, P.J.; Baker, B.J.; Moran, A.L.; Woods, H.A.; Avila, C.; Johnstone, G.J.; Stark, J.S.; Kocot, K.M.; Lockhart, S.; Saucède, T.; et al. One Antarctic slug to confuse them all: The underestimated diversity of Doris kerguelenensis. Invertebr. Syst. 2022, 36, 419–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Gould, A. Mollusca and Shells. In United States Exploring Expeditions, 1838, 1839, 1840, 1841, 1842 Under the Command of Charles Wilkes, USN; Sherman & Son: Philadelphia, PA, USA, 1852; Volume 12, 510p. [Google Scholar]
  218. Innabi, J.; Stout, C.C.; Valdés, Á. Seven new “cryptic species of Discodorididae (Mollusca, Gastropoda, Nudibranchia) from New Caledonia. Zookeys 2023, 1152, 45–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  219. Schrödl, M. Revision of Dorid Nudibranchia Collected during the French Cape Horn Expedition in 1882–1883, with Discussion of the Genus Geitodoris Bergh, 1891. Veliger 2000b, 43, 197–209. [Google Scholar]
  220. Osorio, C.; Reid, D.G. Moluscos marinos intermareales y submareales entre la Boca del Guafo y el estero Elefantes, sur de Chile. Investig. Mar. Valpso. 2004, 32, 71–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  221. Maynard, D. Range extension or was it always there and we weren’t looking? Tasman. Nat. 2014, 136, 101–107. [Google Scholar]
  222. Avila, C.; Iken, K.; Fontana, A.; Cimino, G. Chemical ecology of the Antarctic nudibranch Bathydoris hodgsoni Eliot, 1907: Defensive role and origin of its natural products. J. Exp. Mar. Biol. Ecol. 2000, 252, 27–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  223. Kaiser, P. Die Gattung Bathydoris Bergh 1884 in patagonischen Gewässern (Opisthobranchia, Nudibranchia). Spixiana 1980, 3, 43–51. [Google Scholar]
  224. Rudman, W.B. Pseudotritonia quadrangularis Thiele, 1912. In Sea Slug Forum; Australian Museum: Sydney, Australian, 2007; Available online: http://www.seaslugforum.net/factsheet/pseuquad (accessed on 3 November 2024).
  225. Pola, M.; Camacho-Garcia, Y.E.; Gosliner, T.M. Molecular data illuminate cryptic nudibranch species: The evolution of the Scyllaeidae (Nudibranchia: Dendronotina) with a revision of Notobryon. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2012, 165, 311–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  226. Arntz, W.E.; Thatje, S.; Linse, K.; Avila, C.; Ballesteros, M.; Barnes, D.K.; Teixido, N. Missing link in the Southern Ocean: Sampling the marine benthic fauna of remote Bouvet Island. Polar Biol. 2006, 29, 83–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  227. Reid, D.G.; Osorio, C. The shallow-water marine Mollusca of the Estero Eleantes and Laguna San Rafael, southern Chile. Bull. Nat. Histtory Mus. Lond. 2000, 66, 109–146. [Google Scholar]
  228. Wägele, H. The morphology and taxonomy of the Antarctic species of Tritonia Cuvier, 1797 (Nudibranchia: Dendronotoidea). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 1995, 113, 21–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  229. De Vasconcelos Silva, F.; Pola, M.; Cervera, J.L. A stomach plate to divide them all: A phylogenetic reassessment of the family Tritoniidae (Nudibranchia: Cladobranchia). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2023, 199, 445–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  230. Kienberger, K.; Carmona, L.; Pola, M.; Padula, V.; Gosliner, T.M.; Cervera, J.L. Aeolidia papillosa (Linnaeus, 1761) (Mollusca: Heterobranchia: Nudibranchia), single species or a cryptic species complex? A morphologial and molecular study. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2016, 177, 481–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  231. Carmona, L.; Lei, B.R.; Pola, M.; Gosliner, T.M.; Valdés, A.; Cervera, J.L. Untangling the Spurilla neapolitana (Delle Chiaje, 1841) species complex: A review of the genus Spurilla Bergh, 1864 (Mollusca: Nudibranchia: Aeolidiidae). Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2014, 170, 132–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  232. Churchill, C.K.; Valdés, A.; Foighil, D.Ó. Molecular and morphological systematics of neustonic nudibranchs (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Glaucidae: Glaucus), with descriptions of three new cryptic species. Invertebr. Syst. 2014, 28, 174–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  233. SOMBASE British Antarctic Survey—Southern Ocean mollusc database: A Tool for Biogeographic Analysis in Diversity and Evolution. Available online: https://www.gbif.org/dataset/2952a69a-c159-4e83-849f-738428d5cea6 (accessed on 4 September 2024).
  234. Pelseneer, P. Zoologie: Mollusques (Amphineures, Gastropodes et Lamellibranches); Expédition antarctique Belge: Résultats du voyage du S.Y. Belgica en 1897–1898–1899 sous le commandement de A. de Gerlache de Gomery: Rapports scientifiques (1901–1913); J.-E. Buschmann: Antwerp, Belgium, 1903; 85p. [Google Scholar]
  235. Arias, A.; Crocetta, F. Umbraculum umbraculum (Gastropoda: Heterobranchia) spreading northwards: Additional evidence to the “tropicalization” of the Bay of Biscay. Cah. Biol. Mar. 2016, 57, 285–286. [Google Scholar]
  236. Nimbs, M.J. Designation of a Neotype for the Dwarf Sea Hare Aplysia concava GB Sowerby I, 1833, and a Review of the Status of Aplysia norfolkensis GB Sowerby II, 1869 (Mollusca: Heterobranchia). Rec. Aust. Mus. 2021, 73, 147–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  237. Willan, R.C. Order Notaspidea. In Mollusca: The Southern Synthesis. Fauna of Australia; Beesley, P.L., Ross, G.J.B., Wells, A., Eds.; CSIRO Publishing: Clayton, Victoria, 1998; Volume 5B, pp. 977–980. [Google Scholar]
  238. Orrell, T. Informatics and Data Science Center—Digital Stewardship. NMNH Extant Specimen Records (USNM, US), Version 1.86; National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution. 2024. Available online: https://www.gbif.org/dataset/821cc27a-e3bb-4bc5-ac34-89ada245069d (accessed on 4 September 2024).
  239. Bastida, R.; Roux, A.; Martinez, D.E. Benthic communities of the Argentine continental shelf. Oceanol. Acta 1992, 15, 687–698. [Google Scholar]
  240. Bakker, H.; Gill, A.; Creuwels, J. Naturalis Biodiversity Center (NL)—Mollusca. Naturalis Biodiversity Center. Occurrence Dataset. 2024. Available online: https://www.gbif.org/dataset/d962a7dc-2183-4824-bb88-5e0ba14ec62d (accessed on 4 September 2024).
  241. Gutt, Sirenko, Arntz, Smirnov; De Broyer Weddell Sea Macrozoobenthos. 2000. Available online: https://www.gbif.org/dataset/7b52e794-f762-11e1-a439-00145eb45e9a (accessed on 4 September 2024).
  242. MolluscaBase eds. MolluscaBase. Toledonia brevior Eales, 1923. 2025c. World Register of Marine Species. Available online: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=509720 (accessed on 8 April 2025).
  243. Gould, A.A. Descriptions of new shells, collected by the United States Exploring Expedition. Proc. Boston Soc. Nat. History. 1847, 2, 170–173. [Google Scholar]
  244. MolluscaBase eds. MolluscaBase. Toledonia circumrosa (Thiele, 1904). 2025d. World Register of Marine Species. Available online: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=509710 (accessed on 4 April 2025).
  245. Bouchet, P. Toledonia lymnaeaeformis (E. A. Smith, 1879). MolluscaBase (2017). 2010. Available online: http://marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=197475 (accessed on 7 February 2018).
  246. Linse, K.; Schiotte, T. A new species of Diaphana from bathyal depths in the Weddell Sea, Antarctica and first record of Diaphana inflata (Strebel, 1908) in the high Antarctic (Gastropoda: Opisthobranchia). J. Molluscan Stud. 2002, 68, 147–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  247. Linse, K.; Schrödl, M.; McCIain, C.R.; Allcock, L. Mollusca in the Antarctic deep sea-preliminary notes on their taxonomy, biogeography and diversity. Berichte Zur Polar Und Meeresforsch. 2002, 470, 95–101. [Google Scholar]
  248. Burn, R. Notes on some opisthobranchs mainly from South Australia. Rec. South Aust. Mus. 1966, 15, 329–352. [Google Scholar]
  249. Moles, J.; Avila, C.; Malaquias, M.A.E. Systematic revision of the Antarctic gastropod family Newnesiidae (Heterobranchia: Cephalaspidea) with the description of a new genus and a new abyssal species. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 2017a, XX, 763–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  250. Moles, J.; Wägele, H.; Schrödl, M.; Avila, C. A new Antartic heterobranch clade is sister to all other Cephalaspidea (Mollusca: Gastropoda). Zool. Scr. 2017c, 46, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  251. Chaban, E.M.; Ekimova, I.A.; Chernyshev, A.V. Philinopsis gigliolii (Gastropoda: Heterobranchia: Aglajidae) from the Sea of Japan: Validity, synonymy and biogeography. Invertebr. Zoolology 2024, 21, 157–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  252. Chaban, E.M. New genus of opisthobranch molluscs Antarctophiline gen. nov. (Cephalaspidea: Philinoidea) from the Cooperation Sea, Antarctica. Ruthenica Russ. Malacol. J. 2016, 26, 49–56. [Google Scholar]
  253. Moles, J.; Avila, C.; Malaquias, M.A.E. Unmasking Antarctic mollusc lineages: Novel evidence from philinoid snails (Gastropoda: Cephalaspidea). Cladistic 2019, 35, 487–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  254. Doello-Jurado, M. Dos nuevas especies de moluscos marinos. Physis 1918, 4, 259–273. [Google Scholar]
  255. Powell, A.W.B. New species of nudibranchiate Mollusca from Auckland waters. Rec. Auckl. Inst. Mus. 1937, 2, 119–124. [Google Scholar]
  256. Willan, R.C. Marine Molluscs: Opisthobranchia, Part 2; Leigh Marine Laboratory, University of Auckland: Auckland, New Zealand, 1984; 106p. [Google Scholar]
  257. Mccarthy, J.; Krug, P.J.; Valdés, A. Integrative systematics of Placida cremoniana (Trinchese, 1892) (Gastropoda, Heterobranchia, Sacoglossa) reveals multiple pseudocryptic species. Mar. Biodivers. 2017, 49, 357–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  258. Bouchet, P.; Decock, W.; Lonneville, B.; Vanhoorne, B.; Vandepitte, L. Marine biodiversity discovery: The metrics of new species descriptions. Front. Mar. Sci. 2023, 10, 929989. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  259. Primo, C.; Vázquez, E. Chapter 5.27. Ascidian fauna south of the Sub-Tropical Front. In Biogographic Atlas of the Southern Ocean; De Broyer, C., Koubbi, P., Griffiths, H.J., Raymond, B., d’Udekem d’Acoz, C., Van de Putte, A.P., Danis, B., David, B., Grant, S., Gutt, J., et al., Eds.; Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research: Cambridge, UK, 2014; pp. 221–228. [Google Scholar]
  260. Peñas, A.; Rolán, E. Deep Water Pyramidelloidea of the Tropical South Pacific: Turbonilla and Related Genera. Tropical Deep Sea Benthos; MNHN: Paris, France, 2010; Volume 26, 436p. [Google Scholar]
  261. Peñas, A.; Rolán, E. Deep Water Pyramidelloidea from the Central and South Pacific: 3. The Tribes Eulimellini and Syrnolini; Universidade de Santiago de Compostela: Galicia, Spain, 2016; 304p. [Google Scholar]
  262. Peñas, A.; Rolán, E. Deep Water Pyramidelloidea from the Central and South Pacific, Part. 4: The Tribe Chrysallidini; Universidade de Vigo: Vigo, Spain, 2017; 412p. [Google Scholar]
  263. Oskars, T.R.; Bouchet, P.; Malaquias, M.A.E. A new phylogeny of the Cephalaspidea (Gastropoda: Heterobranchia) based on expanded taxon sampling and gene markers. Mol. Phylogenetics Evol. 2015, 89, 130–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  264. Valdés, A.; Hammon, J.; Behrens, D.; Dupont, A. Caribbean Sea Slugs; Sea Challengers: Montgomery, IL, USA, 2006; 289p. [Google Scholar]
  265. Gosliner, T.M. Nudibranchs of Southern Africa: A Guide ot Opisthobranch Molluscs of Southern Africa; Sea Challerngers: Montgomery, IL, USA, 1987; 136p. [Google Scholar]
  266. Burn, R. Nudibranchs and Related Molluscs; Museum Victoria Field Guides: Melbourne, Australia, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  267. Cobb, G.; Willan, R.C. Undersea Jewels: A colour Guide to Nudibranchs; Australian Biological Resources Study: Canberra, Australia, 2006; 312p. [Google Scholar]
  268. Coleman, N. 1001 Nudibranchs: Catalogue of Indo-Pacific Sea Slugs; Neville Coleman’s Underwater Geographic Pty Ltd.: Springwood, Australia, 2001. [Google Scholar]
  269. Coleman, N. Nudibranchs Encyclopedia (New); Neville Coleman’s Underwater Geographic: Springwood, Australia, 2008. [Google Scholar]
  270. Nimbs, M.J.; Hutton, I.; Davis, T.R.; Larkin, M.F.; Smith, S.D.A. The heterobranch sea slugs of Lord Howe Island, NSW, Australia (Mollusca: Gastropoda). Proc. R. Soc. Vic. 2020, 132, 12–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  271. Nimbs, M.J.; Wilson, N.G. Saved by the Shell: Molecular Analysis Detects the Cryptic Sea Hare, Aplysia concava G. B. Sowerby I, 1833 (Mollusca: Heterobranchia: Aplysiidae), from Oceania, with a Redescription. Taxonomy 2021, 1, 48–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  272. Yonow, N. Red Sea Opisthobranchia 4: The orders Cephalaspidea, Anaspidea, Notaspidea and Nudibranchia: Dendronotacea and Aeolidacea. Fauna Arab. 2000, 18, 87–132. [Google Scholar]
  273. Yonow, N. Opisthobranchs from the western Indian Ocean, with descriptions of two new species and ten new records (Mollusca, Gastropoda). ZooKeys 2012, 197, 1–130. Available online: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/pmc3376724/ (accessed on 4 June 2024). [CrossRef]
  274. Yonow, N. Sea slugs: Unespected biodiversity and distribution. In The Red Sea; Rasul, N.-M.-A., Stewart, I.C.F., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; pp. 531–550. [Google Scholar]
  275. Apte, D. Opisthobranch fauna of Lakshadweep Islands, India, with 52 new records to Lakshadweep and 40 new records to India: Part 1. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 2009, 106, 162–175. [Google Scholar]
  276. Apte, D.; Bhave, V.; Parasharya, D. An annotated and illustrated checklist of the opisthobranch fauna of Gulf of Kutch, Gujarat, India, with 21 new records for Gujarata and 13 new records from India: Part 1. J. Bombay Nat. Hist. Soc. 2010, 107, 14–23. [Google Scholar]
  277. Coleman, N. Nudibranchs encyclopedia—Catalogue of Asia/Indo Pacific Sea Slugs, 2nd ed.; Neville Coleman’s Underwater Geographic: Springwood, Australia, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  278. Gosliner, T.M.; Valdés, Á.; Behrens, D.W. Nudibranch and Sea Slug Identification: Indo-Pacific; New World Publications: Jacksonville, FL, USA, 2015; 408p. [Google Scholar]
  279. Behrens, D.W.; Hermosillo, A.; Fletcher, K.; Jensen, G.C. Eastern Pacific Nudibranchs; Sea Challengers: Montgomery, IL, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  280. García, F.J.; Bertsch, H. Diversity and distribution of the Gastropoda Opisthobranchia from the Atlantic Ocean: A global biogeogaphic approach. Sci. Mar. 2009, 73, 153–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  281. Gosliner, T.M.; Draheim, R. Indo-Pacific opisthobranch gastropod biogeography: How do we know what we don’t know? Am. Malacol. Bull. 1996, 12, 37–43. [Google Scholar]
  282. Rudman, W.B.; Willan, R.C. Opisthobranchia. In The Southern Synthesis. Fauna of Australia; CSIRO: Melbourne, Australia, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  283. MolluscaBase. (Ed.) MolluscaBase. Ringiculimorpha. 2025e. World Register of Marine Species. Available online: https://www.marinespecies.org/aphia.php?p=taxdetails&id=1059023 (accessed on 4 April 2025).
  284. Jensen, K.R. Biogeography of the Sacoglossa (Mollusca, Opisthobrancia). Bonn. Zool. Beiträgem 2007, 55, 255–281. [Google Scholar]
  285. Moles, J.; Wägele, H.; Cutignano, A.; Fontana, A.; Ballesteros, M.; Avila, C. Giant embryos and hatchlings of Antarctic nudibranchs (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Heterobranchia). Mar. Biol. 2017b, 164, 114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  286. Ballesteros, M. Biological Cycle of Two Outstanding Nudibranchs from Antarctica. OPK-Opistobranquis. 2024. Available online: http://opistobranquis.info/en/?p=45501 (accessed on 8 December 2024).
  287. Kiko, R.; Kramer, M.; Spindler, M.; Wägele, H. Tergipes antarcticus (Gastropoda, Nudibranchia): Distribution, life cycle, morphology, anatomy and adaptation of the first mollusk known to live in Antarctic sea ice. Polar Biol. 2008, 31, 1383–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  288. Burridge, A.K.; Goetze, E.; Wall-Palmer, D.; Le Double, S.L.; Huisman, J.; Peijnenburg, K.T.C.A. Diversity and abundance of pteropods and heteropods along a latitudinal gradient across the Atlantic Ocean. Prog. Oceanogr. 2017, 158, 213–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  289. Orr, J.C.; Fabry, V.J.; Aumont, O.; Bopp, L.; Doney, S.C.; Feely, R.A.; Gnanadesikan, A.; Gruber, N.; Ishida, A.; Joos, F.; et al. Anthropogenic ocean acidification over the twenty-first century and its impact on calcifying organisms. Nature 2005, 437, 681–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 2. Numbers of species recorded in each of the areas and zones of the Southern Ocean.
Figure 2. Numbers of species recorded in each of the areas and zones of the Southern Ocean.
Diversity 17 00330 g002
Table 1. Numbers of species grouped by taxonomic order from each zone.
Table 1. Numbers of species grouped by taxonomic order from each zone.
ZoneActeonimorphaRingiculimorphaNudibranchiaPleurobranchidaUmbraculidaPteropodaCephalaspideaRuncinaceaAplysiidaSacoglossaTotal Species
Patagonia/Magellan40393081300471
Falkland (Malvinas) Is.1015103900029
South Georgia Is.30151071000036
South Sandwich Is.102105300012
South Orkney Is.109301300017
Bouvet Is.00300210006
Prince Edward/Crozet Is.002006200010
Kerguelen Is.205000800015
Macquarie Is.00300000003
Tasmania3093422321512154
South Island, New Zealand4147403223153120
Weddell Sea10194081600048
West Antarctica30191013900045
Ross Sea20261061600051
East Antarctica2022108900042
Total Antarctica404040142700089
Total by groups14120913240902617394
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ballesteros, M.; Hopkins, A.; Salicrú, M.; Nimbs, M.J. Heterobranch Sea Slugs s.l. (Mollusca, Gastropoda) from the Southern Ocean: Biodiversity and Taxonomy. Diversity 2025, 17, 330. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17050330

AMA Style

Ballesteros M, Hopkins A, Salicrú M, Nimbs MJ. Heterobranch Sea Slugs s.l. (Mollusca, Gastropoda) from the Southern Ocean: Biodiversity and Taxonomy. Diversity. 2025; 17(5):330. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17050330

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ballesteros, Manuel, Alex Hopkins, Miquel Salicrú, and Matt J. Nimbs. 2025. "Heterobranch Sea Slugs s.l. (Mollusca, Gastropoda) from the Southern Ocean: Biodiversity and Taxonomy" Diversity 17, no. 5: 330. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17050330

APA Style

Ballesteros, M., Hopkins, A., Salicrú, M., & Nimbs, M. J. (2025). Heterobranch Sea Slugs s.l. (Mollusca, Gastropoda) from the Southern Ocean: Biodiversity and Taxonomy. Diversity, 17(5), 330. https://doi.org/10.3390/d17050330

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop