Next Article in Journal
AAV Gene Therapy for MPS IVA with Induction of Immune Tolerance via Oral Administration of Epitope Peptides of N-Acetylgalactosamine-6-sulfate Sulfatase
Next Article in Special Issue
Cerebral Ischemia–Reperfusion Injury: Unraveling the Mitophagy–Oxidative Stress Axis for Neuroprotective Strategies
Previous Article in Journal
Alpha and Beta Emitters in Translational Nuclear Medicine: Clinical Advances, Challenges, and Future Direction
Previous Article in Special Issue
Complexity of Damage-Associated Molecular Pattern Molecule Expression Profile in Porcine Brain Affected by Ischemic Stroke
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Molecular Mechanisms and Targeted Intervention Strategies of Calcium Overload in Ischemic Stroke

Department of Neurosurgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan 430060, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(5), 2279; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27052279
Submission received: 5 January 2026 / Revised: 12 February 2026 / Accepted: 18 February 2026 / Published: 28 February 2026
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Diagnosis and Targeted Therapies in Ischemic Stroke)

Abstract

Ischemic stroke is a leading cause of global neurological mortality and disability, characterized by a complex pathogenesis wherein calcium overload constitutes a pivotal mechanism in neuronal and glial cell death. Following ischemia and reperfusion, excitotoxicity triggered by excessive glutamate release activates NMDA receptors and voltage-dependent calcium channels, leading to a large accumulation of intracellular Ca2+. This calcium dyshomeostasis subsequently initiates a cascade of detrimental events, including mitochondrial dysfunction, endoplasmic reticulum stress, reactive oxygen species generation, and the activation of calcium-dependent enzymes (such as calpain and phospholipase A2), ultimately culminating in cellular apoptosis or necrosis. In addition, calcium signaling imbalance is closely related to various forms of programmed cell death, such as ferroptosis and necroptosis. Research on calcium overload extends beyond neurons, with investigations in microglia and astrocytes yielding significant mechanistic insights. Although targeted interventions, encompassing calcium channel blockers, NMDA receptor antagonists, mitochondrial calcium homeostasis regulators, and calmodulin/calmodulin kinase (CaM/CaMK) inhibitors, have demonstrated preclinical progress, their clinical translation remains constrained. Future investigations should prioritize elucidating the nuanced regulatory mechanisms of calcium signaling pathways, developing highly selective and low-toxicity calcium intervention drugs, and combining multi-target treatment strategies such as neuroprotection, anti-inflammation, and tissue repair to provide theoretical basis and new solutions for the precise treatment of ischemic stroke.

1. Introduction

Ischemic stroke (IS), ranking as the second leading cause of death and the third leading cause of disability worldwide, has become a major public health challenge with significant implications for human health and social development [1,2]. Epidemiological data show that IS accounts for approximately 87% of all stroke cases [3]. In 2021, the global burden of IS was substantial, with an estimated 7.8 million patients (95% uncertainty interval [UI]: 6,719,760–8,943,692) and an age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) of 92.39 per 100,000 population (that is, there were 92.39 new cases per 100,000 population) [4]. Furthermore, direct medical costs attributable to IS exceed 80% of total stroke-related expenses [5]. The pathological features of this disease are manifested as interruption of cerebral blood flow caused by thrombosis, atherosclerosis or embolism, leading to ischemic and hypoxic damage to brain tissue. Clinically, this manifests as neurological deficits including hemiplegia, aphasia, and cognitive impairment [6,7]. With the intensification of population aging, the dual burden imposed by IS on healthcare and social welfare systems continues to escalate, underscoring the urgent need to explore its pathological mechanism and identify novel therapeutic targets.
Current therapeutic strategies for IS primarily aim to rapidly restore cerebral blood flow to limit brain tissue damage. Intravenous thrombolysis, notably with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA), represents a treatment method recommended by guidelines to dissolve the thrombus blocking the blood vessel and restore blood flow [8]. Despite its widespread clinical application, t-PA therapy is constrained by a narrow therapeutic time window, an increased bleeding risk upon time-window extension, and limited efficacy in large vessel occlusion [9]. Endovascular thrombectomy, an alternative interventional modality, physically removes clots and is particularly indicated for large vessel occlusion. However, this method also has its limitations such as heightened procedural risks in narrower vessels, insufficient evidence for central vessel occlusions, and no significant mortality reduction in large core infarctions. Although combining thrombectomy with thrombolysis can enhance recanalization rates, clinical benefits remain confined to a subset of patients [10].
Calcium overload has been identified as a central mechanism in cerebral ischemia–reperfusion injury during IS pathogenesis [11]. Under physiological conditions, Ca2+ serves as a fundamental regulatory factor for cellular functions and a crucial second messenger, thereby maintaining systemic homeostasis. As a crucial second messenger within cells, it participates in the neural transmission process, stabilizes the cell membrane potential and regulates the excitability of neurons [12,13]. Furthermore, Ca2+ mediates depolarization signal transduction, thereby influencing cytoskeletal reorganization, cell migration, and even immune escape. Its role is particularly critical in the nervous system, where Ca2+ facilitates neural signal transduction and neurotransmitter release through voltage-gated calcium channels(VGCCs), regulates mitochondrial ATP synthesis to sustain energy metabolism, and affects the expression of genes related to neural plasticity and cell survival through CaM pathways [14]. Another essential function involves intracellular Ca2+ homeostasis, which is precisely maintained by calcium buffering systems and specific ion channels such as Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 4 (TRPV4) [15]. Extracellular Ca2+ can also enter cells through plasma membrane channels and participate in regulatory processes under physiological and pathological conditions [16]. During the pathological process of IS, ischemia-induced Calcium overload disrupts this homeostasis, initiating cytotoxic cascades through protease activation and free radical generation, ultimately resulting in irreversible damage to neurons [17]. Consequently, targeting Calcium overload is beneficial for reversing or alleviating IS-related damage. Clinical evidence indicates that calcium homeostasis imbalance is closely related to the progression of IS, serum ionic calcium levels not only have a significant correlation with the severity of the disease (NIHSS score), but also affect infarction volume [18]. Notably, the relationship between calcium levels and prognosis exhibits a dual nature: while some studies associate higher serum calcium with improved outcomes [19,20], there is also evidence suggesting that calcium overload may worsen the recovery of neurological function by promoting mitochondrial dysfunction and other pathways [21]. This apparent contradiction highlights the necessity for further investigation into the dynamic regulatory networks governing calcium signaling in IS.
Based on the current understanding of IS pathogenesis, from calcium signal transduction at the microscopic level to the expansion of infarction foci at the macroscopic level, calcium homeostasis imbalance runs through all links of the ischemic cascade response. Animal experiments have confirmed that calcium-regulating drugs (such as Gen) can improve neurological function by reducing infarct area by approximately 34% [22]. These findings offer promising translational implications. A systematic elucidation of the spatiotemporal dynamics and underlying molecular mechanism of calcium overload is therefore essential, not only for informing neuroprotective strategies and developing precise prognostic frameworks, but also for overcoming existing therapeutic limitations.

2. Calcium Homeostasis and Calcium Overload

2.1. Maintenance of Normal Calcium Homeostasis

Under normal physiological conditions, neuronal Ca2+ concentrations are maintained in a tightly regulated dynamic balance. A substantial gradient exists between the cytoplasmic Ca2+ level (approximately 100 nM) and the concentrations found in the extracellular area (about 1.2 mM) as well as within intracellular reservoirs such as the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and mitochondria (about 0.5–1 mM). This steady state depends on multiple mechanisms [23,24,25]: Primary regulation is achieved through the integrated activity of calcium channels and pumps. VGCCs, receptor-gated channels (such as NMDARs), ER calcium release channels (IP3R, RyR), and calcium pumps (SERCA, PMCA) collectively govern Ca2+ influx and efflux to maintain the concentration gradient. Furthermore, mitochondria regulate calcium uptake and release through MCU (mitochondrial calcium uniporter) and NCLX (Na+/Ca2+ exchanger), while the ER stores calcium through SERCA pumps, and IP3R and RyR mediate calcium release. In addition, calcium-binding proteins such as CaM further consolidate the homeostatic system by buffering free Ca2+ in the cytoplasm, thereby preventing local excessive concentration [14].

2.2. The Functional Characteristics of Ca2+

In neuronal cells, Ca2+ enters through VGCCs or membrane receptors, thereby triggering neurotransmitter release from synaptic vesicles, a fundamental process underlying neural transmission [13]. Concurrently, Ca2+ influx via VGCCs stabilizes membrane potential and modulates neuronal excitability, thereby influencing nerve impulse propagation [26]. In specific neurons (such as hippocampal neurons), Ca2+ signals regulate synaptic plasticity by activating calcium-dependent proteins including CaM-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII), and participate in the learning and memory processes [27,28]. During development, calcium influx activates downstream pathways, guiding neuronal differentiation [29,30].
Under physiological conditions, Ca2+ signaling in astrocytes is primarily governed by GPCRs (e.g., purinergic receptors), which activate the phospholipase C–IP3R pathway and trigger Ca2+ release from the ER. Additional regulatory mechanisms include store-operated Ca2+ entry (SOCE) mediated by STIM1/Orai1 and the involvement of TRP channels. These finely tuned Ca2+ oscillations are indispensable for cerebral homeostasis; they underpin the release and reuptake of gliotransmitters such as ATP and glutamate, modulate synaptic plasticity and neurotransmission efficacy, and are central to neurovascular coupling—the process that dynamically adjusts local cerebral blood flow to meet neuronal metabolic demand. Moreover, these signals directly support the structural and functional integrity of the blood–brain barrier (BBB), modulate neurotransmission [31], and indirectly regulate neuronal activity [32,33,34].
In microglia, Ca2+ signaling primarily functions as a regulator of their sentinel activity within the CNS. Transduction occurs via P2X7/P2Y purinergic receptors, CRAC channels (predominantly Orai1), and TRP channels. Transient, tightly regulated Ca2+ elevations drive dynamic process extension, directional migration, and chemotactic responses to minute concentrations of damage-associated signals such as ATP. These calcium events constitute the cellular basis for continuous parenchymal surveillance, efficient clearance of microdebris, and maintenance of immune quiescence [35]. In summary, Ca2+ orchestrate neurotransmission, excitability, and pathological responses in neurons, whereas in glial cells they are engaged in neuromodulation and inflammatory control.
As integral components of the BBB, cerebral microvascular endothelial cells rely on Ca2+ signaling to precisely regulate barrier integrity, permeability, and neurovascular coupling. Serving as a versatile second messenger, calcium integrates mechanical stimuli (e.g., shear stress sensed via Piezo1 channels) and circulating humoral factors. Through pathways involving VGCC subunits (e.g., Cavβ3) and GPCRs, intracellular Ca2+ dynamics modulate the phosphorylation status of tight junction proteins (e.g., Claudin-5, Occludin) and actin cytoskeletal remodeling. These events dynamically sustain selective permeability and effectively exclude neurotoxic substances from the brain parenchyma [36,37,38,39]. Elevated endothelial Ca2+ also promotes the release of vasodilatory mediators such as nitric oxide (NO) and prostaglandins, thereby fine-tuning vascular tone and ensuring adequate oxygenation and neurovascular coupling within the cerebral microcirculation [40,41]. Furthermore, Ca2+ signals mediate neurotransmitter-evoked responses in endothelial cells; for instance, GABA receptor activation elicits a biphasic Ca2+ elevation via IP3-dependent ER release and subsequent SOCE, contributing to signal integration and neuromodulatory functions in the endothelium [42]. Pericytes, which constitute another essential component of the microvascular wall, exhibit Ca2+ signals that coordinate their contractile and relaxant states under physiological conditions. This signaling directly governs capillary tone and local cerebral blood flow, thereby exerting a critical influence on neurovascular coupling and microcirculatory stability [43] (Figure 1).

2.3. Calcium Overload Mechanism

Calcium overload refers to a state characterized by disrupted intracellular calcium homeostasis, wherein Ca2+ accumulation surpasses physiological regulatory capacity and subsequently initiates multiple damage networks. This overload originates from both transmembrane Ca2+ influx and abnormal release of intracellular calcium reservoirs under ischemic conditions. The ensuing cytotoxicity is mediated by the activation of various Ca2+-dependent enzymes, including calpain, phospholipase A2 (PLA2), and endonucleases [23].
Meanwhile, mitochondrial function becomes critically impaired through the synergistic effects of calcium overload and ROS. This interaction promotes the opening of mitochondrial permeability transition pores (mPTP), leading to the collapse of mitochondrial membrane potential and cessation of ATP synthesis. The resulting energy crisis is compounded by cytochrome c release, which activates the apoptotic pathway, while dysfunction of the MCU and voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC) further exacerbate mitochondrial calcium accumulation [44].
Furthermore, calcium overload induces ROS bursts via mitochondrial electron leakage and NADPH oxidase (NOX) activation. These ROS, in turn, inhibit antioxidant systems such as glutathione, thereby establishing a self-perpetuating vicious cycle of damage [14,45].
Other mechanisms can significantly amplify this injury. For instance, the excitotoxicity of glutamate and the effect of transient receptor potential (TRP) channels can also amplify the damage. Specifically, the coupling of extrapsynaptic N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (esNMDAR) with TRPM2 can prolong calcium influx [46]. Section 3 provides a specific summary of the most salient mechanisms and pathological consequences of calcium overload in IS (Table 1).

3. The Pathological Role of Calcium Overload in Ischemic Stroke

3.1. Calcium Overload Mediates Neuronal Apoptosis

Calcium overload serves as a direct trigger for neuronal apoptosis by initiating multiple enzymatic cascades. Following IS, the pathologically elevated of intracellular Ca2+ concentration first activates the calcium-dependent protease calpain. This enzyme hydrolyzes cytoskeletal proteins and compromises BBB integrity by disrupting the tight junction protein ZO-1, consequently resulting in the loss of neuronal structural integrity [23,47]. Concurrently, calcium overload can induce the Ca2+/CAM-CAMKII-DRP1 signaling axis: upon binding Ca2+, CaM activates CaMKII, which subsequently promotes the phosphorylation of mitochondrial fission protein DRP1. This cascade leads to excessive mitochondrial fission and disruption of energy metabolism, ultimately driving neuronal apoptosis [48,49]. Furthermore, calcium overload specifically upregulates and promotes polymerization of TLK2 kinase, an event that induces nuclear membrane rupture and abnormal entry of neurons into the mitotic cycle (mitotic disaster), further amplifying the apoptotic effect [50]. These processes are intimately linked to excitotoxic mechanisms. Specifically, coupling between esNMDAR and TRPM2 channels prolongs calcium influx, while downregulation of astrocytic glutamate transporter 1 (GLT-1) impairs synaptic glutamate clearance. The abnormally activated NMDAR-CaMKIIα pathway promotes the pro-apoptotic signal JNK to dominate the downstream death program [46]. Notably, the calcium influx mediated by the NMDA receptor GluN2B subtype exhibits threefold greater intensity than that of GluN2A, substantially exacerbating mitochondrial calcium overload and accelerating apoptosis [51,52,53].

3.2. Calcium Overload Induces Oxidative Stress and Free Radical Burst

Calcium overload and oxidative stress interact through a self-reinforcing vicious cycle that significantly amplifies neuronal injury. Mitochondrial calcium overload directly inhibits the activities of respiratory chain complexes I and III, and cytochrome c oxidase (COX), while simultaneously triggering reactive oxygen species (ROS) burst through electron leakage and NOX activation. The resulting oxidative stress subsequently suppresses antioxidant systems such as glutathione, thereby establishing a positive feedback damage loop that perpetuates cellular damage [14,45,54,55].
This destructive interplay is regulated by multiple signaling pathways: After the activation of the Wnt/Ca2+ pathway, the calcium-dependent protein calpain and phosphorylated CaMKII synergistically promote ROS generation and upregulate the expression of the apoptotic executive protein caspase-3 [22]. Meanwhile, the dysregulation of the PI3K/AKT pathway causes calcium overload to activate PLA2 and inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), consequently promoting the release of ROS/RNS and exacerbating mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative damage [56].

3.3. Calcium Overload Leads to Mitochondrial Collapse and Energy Depletion

Mitochondrial dysfunction represents the central pathological outcome of calcium overload. The initial disruption originates from impaired gating of the MCU complex: under pathological conditions, MICU1 subunit depolymerization and detachment from the MCU pore reduces the calcium influx threshold to 3 μM and accelerates calcium overload. Simultaneously, the NCLX exhibits markedly reduced calcium excretion efficiency due to insufficient phosphorylation of PKA, resulting in the collapse of calcium homeostasis [57]. Furthermore, calcium overload directly induces the opening of mPTP, which precipitates membrane potential collapse, cytochrome c release, and interruption of ATP synthesis, subsequently activating mitochondrial-dependent apoptotic pathways [44,55]. This process triggers a vicious cycle of energy metabolism wherein calcium overload inhibits oxidative phosphorylation and reduces ATP production, while ATP depletion deactivates the calcium pump (PMCA/SERCA), ultimately forming an irreversible damage chain reaction of “calcium overload → ATP depletion → pump deactivation → calcium overload” [57,58,59,60].

3.4. Calcium-Dependent Protease Activation and Cytoskeletal Disintegration

As a principal effector of calcium overload, the abnormal activation of the calpain system directly compromises cellular structural integrity. A sudden increase in calcium concentration induces calpain conversion from its inactive precursor to an active state, which subsequently cleaves cytoskeletal proteins and disrupts neuronal architecture. In vascular endothelial cells, calpain degrades the BBB tight junction protein ZO-1, increasing permeability and exacerbating cerebral edema. In addition, calpain proteolyzes neuroprotective proteins including TRPC6 and TrkB, which inhibits their functions and promotes the excessive activation of NMDA receptors. TRPM2 can also overactivation drives dysfunction of NVUs [61]. These collective mechanisms ultimately converge to induce neuronal death [23,47].

3.5. Calcium Overload Disrupts the Function of Non-Neuronal Cells

3.5.1. Astrocytes

Ischemia–reperfusion injury triggers an energetic crisis, leading to excessive extracellular accumulation of glutamate and overactivation of metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs) and P2Y receptors on astrocytes. This strongly amplifies IP3R-mediated Ca2+ release from the ER. Subsequent ER store depletion robustly activates SOCE via the STIM1/Orai1 pathway, driving sustained extracellular Ca2+ influx and generating pronounced, persistent global Ca2+ signals. Prolonged STIM1 activation also secondarily elevates intracellular Na+ concentrations, disrupting the Na+ gradient required for GLT-1 function [32].This Calcium overload induces reactive astrogliosis and causes GLT-1 to reverse its mode of operation—shifting from glutamate uptake to massive glutamate release—thereby directly exacerbating neuronal excitotoxicity. Concurrently, it promotes cytotoxic edema, triggers mitochondrial dysfunction, and amplifies neuroinflammation and oxidative stress via release of inflammatory mediators, culminating in blood–brain barrier (BBB) disruption and progressive conversion of the ischemic penumbra into irreversible infarction [32,33,34].

3.5.2. Microglia

In the early phase of ischemia, high local concentrations of damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), such as ATP released from injured cells, potently activate P2X7 receptors on microglia, eliciting robust, oscillatory Ca2+ waves. SOCE mediated by CRAC channels becomes persistently amplified, and Ca2+ homeostasis is profoundly dysregulated. During reperfusion, oxidative stress and pro-inflammatory signals (e.g., via TLR4 signaling) further exacerbate Ca2+ influx, and these Ca2+ dynamics become temporally synchronized with cortical spreading depolarization (CSD) waves, forming a self-reinforcing vicious cycle [35,62]. Sustained, pathological Ca2+ signaling drives microglial polarization toward a pro-inflammatory M1 phenotype, accompanied by massive release of TNF-α, IL-1β, and ROS, thereby aggravating neuroinflammation and oxidative damage. These aberrant Ca2+ waves, in coordination with CSD, propagate injury signals into the penumbra. Moreover, dysregulated Ca2+ signaling leads to excessive phagocytosis of still-viable synapses (synaptic stripping), disrupting neural network connectivity. Collectively, these processes compromise BBB integrity, facilitate infiltration of peripheral immune cells, and accelerate infarct progression.

3.5.3. Vascular Endothelial Cells

During ischemia, ATP depletion and oxidative stress directly activate TRPM2 channels in endothelial cells, triggering Ca2+ influx. Upon reperfusion, restoration of blood flow generates aberrant shear stress, which strongly activates the mechanosensitive Piezo1 channel and induces even more pronounced Ca2+ entry, subsequently engaging the CaMKII/calpain pathway [38]. Calcium overload, via CaMKII/calpain signaling, directly degrades tight junction proteins (e.g., ZO-1, occludin), leading to structural disintegration of the BBB, a sharp increase in permeability, and life-threatening complications such as vasogenic cerebral edema and hemorrhagic transformation. Concurrently, endothelial cells undergo apoptosis and ferroptosis, release inflammatory mediators, and disrupt NVU coupling—substantially aggravating reperfusion injury and worsening clinical outcomes [37,38,39].

3.5.4. Pericytes

Ischemia induces elevated intracellular Ca2+ concentrations in pericytes, lead ing to aberrant activation of the Ca2+-dependent chloride channel TMEM16A (also known as ANO1). This activation elicits membrane depolarization, which in turn opens VGCCs, establishing a positive feedback loop—“Ca2+ influx → Cl efflux → further depolarization → enhanced Ca2+ influx”—resulting in tonic, irreversible pericyte contraction. Such sustained contraction directly compresses and collapses capillary lumens, representing a core mechanism underlying the “no-reflow” phenomenon even after successful recanalization of large vessels. This contractile rigor persists even after pericyte death, chronically impeding restoration of blood flow and tissue oxygenation, thereby rendering the penumbra incapable of effective reperfusion and driving its progression to infarction [43,63].

3.6. Cascade Damage Caused by ER Calcium Overload

The disruption of ER calcium homeostasis represents a critical mechanism of transorganelle injury in IS. Impaired SERCA pump function results in cytoplasmic calcium accumulation and depletion of ER calcium reservoir, thereby activating the unfolded protein response (UPR). While initial UPR activation through the PERK-EIF2α and ATF6 pathways attempts to reestablish cellular equilibrium, persistent calcium overload converts this adaptive response into a pro-apoptotic mode that accelerates neuronal death [64,65,66]. Furthermore, ER calcium overload also increases calcium flow to mitochondria through mitochondrial-associated membranes (MAMs), triggering mitochondrial calcium overload, ROS burst and the release of apoptotic factors, and forming the ER-mitochondrial apoptotic axis [67,68].
Consequently, calcium overload functions as the core hub of ischemic brain injury, driving irreversible neuronal damage through multi-level pathological networks such as enzymatic cascade activation (calpain, TLK2), CaMKII-DRP1 signaling axis, mitochondrial energy breakdown, oxidative stress burst, glial cell dysfunction, and ER-mitochondrial apoptotic pathways. These collective insights position calcium overload as a pivotal target for developing precise therapeutic interventions (Figure 2).

4. The Spatiotemporal Evolution of Calcium Overload

4.1. The Relationship Between Calcium Overload Mechanisms and Ischemic Du Ration Dynamics

In IS, calcium overload is not an instantaneous event but rather a dynamic, progressive cascade tightly coupled to the duration of ischemia. In the early phase (seconds to minutes) of ischemia, abrupt interruption of blood flow leads to rapid ATP depletion, failure of Na+/K+-ATPase, and subsequent membrane depolarization, which activates VGCCs and glutamate receptors—particularly esNMDARs—resulting in massive extracellular Ca2+ influx [69]. This initial Ca2+ surge activates downstream phospholipases and proteases, initiating early injury cascades. As ischemia prolongs (minutes to hours), ER Ca2+ stores become depleted, and sustained amplification of cytosolic Ca2+ occurs via STIM1/Orai1-mediated SOCE. Concurrently, mitochondria take up substantial Ca2+ through the MCU, leading to matrix Calcium overload, collapse of mitochondrial membrane potential, burst of ROS, and eventual opening of the mPTP, which releases pro-apoptotic factors. During the reperfusion phase (minutes to hours after blood flow recovery), restoration of oxygen supply triggers an “oxidative burst,” further exacerbating Ca2+ influx and mitochondrial Calcium overload, thereby establishing a self-amplifying vicious cycle that drives delayed neuronal death [70]. This dynamic continuum illustrates that calcium overload evolves from an initial triggering signal in early ischemia into a central executor that amplifies injury and dictates cell fate during reperfusion. Once ischemic duration exceeds a critical window (typically 6–8 h), the damage driven by calcium overload progresses from reversible penumbral tissue to irreversible infarction in the ischemic core [71].

4.2. Distinct Profiles of Calcium Overload in Ischemic Core Versus Penumbra: Implications for Tissue Fate

The ischemic core and the ischemic penumbra exhibit fundamental differences in cere bral blood flow, cellular metabolic status, and calcium overload characteristics—distinctions that directly determine their respective fates and responsiveness to therapeutic intervention. In the ischemic core, cerebral blood flow is severely reduced (typically <10–20 mL/100 g/min), leading to rapid and irreversible energy failure. Under these conditions, calcium overload occurs precipitously and with high magnitude: abrupt membrane depolarization triggers a torrential Ca2+ influx through VGCCs and NMDARs, while excessive mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake via MCU rapidly induces mPTP opening, massive ROS generation, and cytochrome c release, culminating in predominantly necrotic cell death within minutes [70]. The microenvironment of the core is intensely pro-inflammatory, exemplified by microglial upregulation of LGALS3, which exacerbates inflammation and fuels glycolysis-dependent injury amplification [71]. In contrast, the ischemic penumbra retains residual perfusion (20–50 mL/100 g/min) and partial energy metabolism, rendering cellular injury progression relatively slower and, within a definable time window, reversible. Calcium overload in this region manifests as intermittent, low-amplitude Ca2+ transients or oscillations rather than sustained supraphysiological elevations [72]. Penumbral cells can mount certain endogenous protective responses—such as upregulation of antioxidant enzymes—to counteract oxidative stress and inflammation downstream of calcium overload. Microglia in this zone may assume distinct functional phenotypes, for instance expressing PIK3IP1, which confers enhanced anti-inflammatory and reparative capacity [71].
Nevertheless, if ischemia persists or reperfusion injury is inadequately managed, calcium overload-driven apoptotic signaling within the penumbra (e.g., sustained mitochondrial damage, calpain activation) and inflammatory cascades progressively intensify. This ultimately leads to neuronal death in the penumbra, which gradually becomes incorporated into the expanding infarct core, thereby increasing total infarct volume [70]. Accordingly, the key to salvaging the penumbra lies in achieving timely, effective reperfusion within the therapeutic window, combined with neuroprotective agents that precisely modulate specific nodes of the calcium overload cascade, thereby intercepting its progression toward irreversible injury.

5. Intervention Strategies for Calcium Overload

5.1. Intervention Strategies Targeting Enzymes

(1)
Calpain inhibitors. Pharmacological inhibition of calpain activity, exemplified by agents such as calpeptin, alleviates neuroinflammatory responses while simultaneously promoting vascular regeneration and blood supply in ischemic areas [73]. Such intervention mitigates BBB dysfunction and reduces neuronal damage, including neuronal protection in the hippocampus [74]. Although calpain-targeted intervention holds broad therapeutic potential, no calpain-specific inhibitors have yet received clinical approval.
(2)
Intervention in the CaM/CaMKII/DRP1 pathway. The calcium chelator BAPTA-AM effectively counteracts the elevated intracellular Ca2+ concentration induced by methylmercury (MeHg). By blocking this pathway, BAPTA-AM restores mitochondrial dynamic balance and attenuates apoptotic cell death [49].
(3)
TLK2 kinase inhibition. Targeting TLK2 kinase with small-molecule inhibitors such as promethazine (PMZ) can reduce calcium overload-induced neuronal death by suppressing TLK2 kinase activity. Corresponding therapeutic effects can also be achieved by inhibiting its downstream effectors, notably through myosin IIA inhibitors. For instance, blebbistatin can inhibit myosin IIA function, alleviate TLK2-mediated nuclear membrane rupture, or interfere with the binding of LC8 to TLK2, which can also weaken the formation of TLK2-Myosin IIA complexes, thereby inhibiting cell death [50].
(4)
Modulation of the Wnt/Ca2+ signaling pathway. Genistein (Gen) can block the calcium release pathway and reduce calcium overload by downregulating the expression of Wnt5a, Frizzled-2, p-CaMKII and IP3R. Additionally, Gen can up-regulate the expression of SOD1/SOD2 and lower the levels of ROS and MDA, resulting in reduced oxidative damage [22].
(5)
PI3K/AKT pathway activation. The compound 6′-O-caffeyl arbutin (CA) can activate the PI3K/AKT pathway, upregulate the anti-apoptotic protein Bcl-2, inhibit Bax expression, and reduce the ratio of Bax/Bcl-2. This regulation decreases the activation of CASP3; concurrently, CA can reduce the phosphorylation of p-IκBα and P65, decrease the release of inflammatory factors, and indirectly alleviate the abnormal opening of calcium channels [56].
Although there are various targeting angles and methods for the aforementioned enzymes related to calcium overload, there are still many unsolved problems and areas to be explored. For example, the enzymatic characteristics and physiological functions of mitochondrial calpain, such as calpain-13, remain poorly characterized [75], and significant translational barriers persist. This is exemplified by the current absence of clinically approved calpain-specific inhibitors, compounded by the fact that different calpain subtypes exert distinct effects, thus requiring precise subtype regulation [76]. Meanwhile, most drugs or compounds remain confined to cellular or animal models, with substantial progress still required before their clinical application for mitigating calcium overload in IS can be realized.

5.2. Intervention Strategies Targeting Mitochondria

Several targeted intervention strategies have been developed to counteract mitochondrial calcium overload, aiming to preserve mitochondrial integrity and improve the prognosis of stroke. Targeting calcium influx, the potent MCU channel blocker Ru265 (Kd = 0.2 nM) can effectively reduce mitochondrial Ca2+ internal flow [77,78]. Similarly, 2-APB, an IP3R antagonist, along with GSK3β inhibitors such as SB216763 can inhibit the IP3R-GRP75-VDAC1 complex, thereby blocking the flow of Ca2+ from ER to mitochondria [79,80]. Curcumin, as a natural regulator, can lower the mitochondrial calcium levels and prevent mitochondrial swelling caused by calcium overload [81]. An alternative approach focuses on enhancing calcium excretion. For instance, Bay 60-7550 can inhibit PDE2 → increase cAMP → activate PKA → phosphorylate the NCLX-S258 site, thereby enhancing the excretion efficiency of Ca2+ [82]. To improve targeting efficiency, nanotechnological delivery systems are being explored. These include TAT peptides for membrane penetration and mitochondrial enzyme targeting, and GYR peptides to bind to the transferrin receptors of diseased NVUs, achieving precise enrichment [57].

5.3. Intervention Strategies for ER

Intervention strategies for ER calcium overload mainly include regulating SERCA function and inhibiting ER stress and UPR. On the one hand, enhancing SERCA activity is a core strategy for alleviating calcium overload. For instance, distal ischemic postconditioning (RIPostC) reduces ER stress and calcium overload by upregulating SERCA2 expression, thereby providing neuroprotection. Similarly, SERCA2a gene therapy has also shown effects in reducing cytoplasmic calcium overload and improving pathological phenotypes in animal models [60,83]. On the other hand, pharmacological inhibition of ER stress and UPR is equally crucial. For instance, neuroserpin alleviates ischemic brain injury and prevents calcium imbalance and apoptosis by suppressing ER stress signaling molecules such as PERK-EIF2α [84]. Additionally, vitamin D3 (VitD3) exerts a protective effect by acting at the intersection of ER stress and ferroptosis [85].

5.4. Targeting the Glutamate System

The interventions focusing on the glutamate system encompass three primary approaches. First, inhibiting the excessive activation of NMDA receptors: Telaprevir can reduce the phosphorylation of GluN2B by inhibiting the activity of MALT1 protease, thereby lowering calcium influx and necrosis and apoptosis [86]. Similarly, memantine acts as a selective antagonist of esNMDAR that blocks calcium influx mediated by GluN2B [87]. Second, enhancing glutamic acid clearance: SHPL-49 upregulates the astrocyte glutamte transporter GLT-1 to promote glutamate reuptake [46]. Alternatively, small-sized graphene oxide (s-GO) alleviates excitotoxicity by reducing presynaptic glutamate release [88]. Third, directly modulating calcium balance: Epigallocatechin gallate(EGCG) upregulates the calcium-binding protein hippocalcin to inhibit the Bax/caspase-3 pathway, thereby alleviating glutamate-induced neuronal death [89]. Retinoic acid reduces intracellular calcium concentration by promoting parvalbumin expression [90]. A major limitation in current excitotoxicity research is the high clinical failure rate, attributable to issues of non-specificity, severe side effects [91,92], pathway redundancy caused by mechanisms complexity and drug delivery challenges. Future research should focus on multi-target therapies or the use of nanotechnology to enhance delivery efficiency and other aspects, in order to overcome these deficiencies and improve therapeutic effects.

5.5. Targeting TRP Channels

TRP channels, functioning as non-selective cation channels, participate in the pathological process of IS by mediating Ca2+ influx. This large channel family includes many categories, such as TRPM, TRPC, and TRPV. For key TRP subtypes, targeted regulation can also be carried out: TRPM2 inhibitors (such as ACA, TAT-M2 peptide, and clotrimazole) can alleviate calcium overload by blocking the ADPR binding domain or inhibiting channel activity [37,93]. Kuanxiong Aerosol (KXA) downregulates the expression of TRPV1, thereby improving mitochondrial function [94]. Furthermore, hyperforin extract and resveratrol can exert a dual protective effect by inhibiting TRPC6 degradation or activating the CREB pathway [37,95]. In addition, the TRPV4 inhibitor GsMTx4 and the TRPM4 antagonist glibenpiride can alleviate brain edema [96,97]. Nevertheless, Obstacles in TRP-targeted therapy include a scarcity of subtype-specific drugs [98]. Persistent challenges, particularly off-target side effects (such as abnormal neural excitability or immune dysfunction [99,100]) and insufficient delivery efficiency, necessitate integrated approaches combining structural analysis techniques with nanocarrier optimization strategies.

5.6. Calcium Channel Blockers (CCBs)

Abnormal activation of VGCCs (such as L-type and T-type) is an important source of calcium overload after ischemic injury [14,101]. T-type CCBs such as mibedil and ML218 inhibit TRPV1-mediated calcium influx, which subsequently reduces CaMKII activity and DRP1 phosphorylation, thereby preserving mitochondrial function [48,94,102]. Likewise, the L-type CCB nimodipine alleviates vasoconstriction and improves cerebral blood flow by antagonizing the CaV1.2 channel [103,104]. However, traditional CCBs have limitations such as insufficient target specificity (such as amlodipine), low selectivity for neuronal Ca2+ channels, which may limit therapeutic efficacy [105,106], alongside hemodynamic risks wherein excessive hypotension may aggravate cerebral ischemia, especially in patients with hypoperfusion [104]. In the future, the efficacy and safety can be enhanced by developing multi-target drugs (combined with antioxidants or anti-inflammatory agents) or nanotechnology-based delivery systems [107].

5.7. Other Intervention Targets

Beyond the above-mentioned mechanisms, several emerging strategies confer neuroprotection by regulating calcium homeostasis. For instance, brevetoxin-2 can influence NMDAR-mediated calcium signaling through sodium channel regulation [108]. Tetrapod framework nucleic acid (tFNA) similarly protects astrocytes by suppressing calcium overload and ROS generation during oxygen-glucose deprivation/reoxygenation (OGD/R) [51]. Mitochondrial Na+/Ca2+ exchange blockers (such as 4,1-benzothiazoles) and insulin pretreatment can reduce calcium influx and mitochondrial depolarization [109,110,111]. The chemokine receptor CX3CR1 alleviates neurotoxicity by inhibiting calcium influx [52]. CRAC channel inhibitors (such as CM-EM-137) antagonize microglial activation by blocking SOCE [111,112]. The SOCE mechanism regulated by the STIM1/Orai1 complex is related to autophagy regulation, revealing a novel therapeutic direction [53]. Collectively, these multi-pathway intervention strategies form a calcium overload regulatory network, opening up diverse target options for IS treatment (Table 2).

5.8. The Predicament of Clinical Transformation

To clearly demonstrate the current status of transformation, we have drawn a table to summarize the preclinical effects and clinical outcomes of the main calcium-targeted drugs (Table 3).
Despite the identification of numerous molecular targets in preclinical studies, neuroprotec tive drugs have consistently failed in clinical trials. This does not invalidate the “calcium overload” hypothesis, but rather reflects a systematic neglect of five critical translational dimensions.
  • Timing: Severe Mismatch of the Therapeutic Window
The excitotoxic cascade triggered by calcium overload evolves predominantly within minutes to one hour after ischemia—the golden window for neuroprotective intervention. In clinical reality, however, substantial delays from symptom onset to hospital admission, diagnosis, and drug administration are inevitable. Early landmark trials, such as the INWEST study with nimodipine, administered treatment up to 12 h post-onset, completely missing this critical window of molecular events and thus failing to reverse neuronal death in the ischemic core [113]. Even the aggressively designed FAST-MAG trial, which administered prehospital intravenous magnesium sulfate at a median of 45 min, showed no functional benefit, demonstrating that ultra-early administration alone is insufficient when the drug itself has inherent limitations (e.g., poor BBB penetration) [132].
  • Dose: narrow therapeutic window and dose-limiting toxicity
Neuroprotective doses identified in animal models often cannot be achieved in humans due to severe adverse effects. Many calcium modulators exhibit a U-shaped dose–response curve. For example, high doses of NMDA receptor antagonists (e.g., Selfotel, Aptiganel) provoked unacceptable neuropsychiatric toxicities—hallucinations, agitation, coma—in clinical trials, forcing dose reductions that resulted in brain concentrations insufficient to effectively block pathological Ca2+ influx [133]. Magnesium sulfate trials faced analogous dilemmas: high doses risked systemic hypotension and respiratory depression, whereas low doses lacked efficacy [134].
  • Specificity: disruption of physiological function and complex drug interactions
Early-generation agents lacked cellular or pathway specificity, blocking pathological pro cesses while simultaneously interfering with indispensable physiological Ca2+ signals. Broad-spectrum NMDA receptor antagonists indiscriminately inhibited both synaptic (pro-survival) and extrasynaptic (pro-death) NMDARs, potentially accelerating neuronal death [114]. More recent, ostensibly more specific compounds—such as Nerinetide (NA-1), designed to precisely disrupt the NMDAR–PSD95–nNOS death signaling complex—have encountered new obstacles. The ESCAPE-NA1 trial (2020) revealed that Nerinetide’s efficacy was completely abrogated by concomitant intravenous alteplase, as plasmin generated from tPA metabolism degrades this peptide drug in the bloodstream. This finding underscores the pharmacokinetic vulnerability of highly specific agents within complex clinical therapeutic regimens [118,135].
  • Drug delivery and BBB penetration: failure to reach the target
Even when a drug can be administered early, at sufficient dose, and with acceptable systemic safety, traversing an intact blood–brain barrier to reach ischemic brain parenchyma remains a formidable hurdle. Magnesium sulfate exemplifies this challenge: although intravenous infusion markedly elevates serum magnesium concentrations, the polar Mg2+ ion crosses the intact BBB extremely inefficiently, resulting in slow and modest increases in cerebrospinal fluid and brain parenchyma, far below the neuroprotective threshold during the acute phase [132,134]. Furthermore, post-ischemic microvascular “no-reflow”—partly attributable to sustained pericyte contraction—further impedes the delivery of blood-borne drugs to the critically endangered ischemic penumbra [136,137].
  • Side effects: systemic actions counterbalance local neuroprotection
Systemic side effects elicited by many calcium-modulating agents directly offset their potential neuroprotective benefits and may even exacerbate injury. The most salient example is the L-type CCB nimodipine. Its potent peripheral vasodilatory action induces systemic hypotension. Because vessels in the ischemic penumbra are already maximally dilated and passively dependent on systemic perfusion pressure, nimodipine-induced hypotension provokes a “steal phenomenon”—diverting blood flow from the low-resistance ischemic territory to drug-dilated normal vessels—thereby exacerbating penumbral ischemia. This mechanism was identified as a principal cause of failure in multiple clinical trials [104,138]. Likewise, the psychotomimetic effects of NMDA receptor antagonists complicate clinical management and compromise trial blinding [139,140].
In summary, the repeated failures of past clinical trials do not refute the central pathological role of calcium overload; rather, they expose a systemic translational gap in applying single-target molecular interventions to the complex reality of human disease. Successful future strategies must holistically address multiple factors, including ultra-early therapeutic windows, precise cell- or pathway-specific targeting, optimized drug delivery systems capable of crossing the BBB, and minimization of systemic hemodynamic disturbances (Figure 3).

6. Expectations

Re-examining the molecular mechanism of calcium overload after ischemic stroke within the overall framework of spatiotemporal evolution and the interaction of neurovascular units is the cognitive starting point to break through the current transformation bottleneck. Calcium overload is a well-established pathogenic mechanism in ischemic stroke, and numerous high-quality reviews have provided in-depth molecular insights—including recent discussions on mitochondrial calcium regulation [69], neuronal calcium dyshomeostasis and therapeutic strategies [14], and systematic evaluations of long-term neuroprotective effects in animal models of calcium modulation [141] and so on. These contributions have laid a solid foundation for the field. However, the majority of these reviews remain confined within a “neuron-centric” and linear reductionist paradigm that emphasizes single targets at discrete time points. In contrast, our review offers a more comprehensive and up-to-date synthesis of the current understanding of calcium overload mechanisms in ischemic stroke. To the best of our knowledge, this represents the most exhaustive overview in the field to date, distinguished by several unique contributions and differentiated value: (i) integration of both preclinical and clinical trial status for calcium overload-targeted agents; (ii) comprehensive incorporation of the spatiotemporal dynamics of calcium overload; (iii) balanced coverage of both neuronal and non-neuronal cell types; and (iv) an updated, critical appraisal of calcium overload-directed interventional strategies. To critically situate the molecular machinery of stroke within a spatiotemporal context, future therapeutic strategies must transition from a “one-size-fits-all” approach toward precise temporal stratification and targeting innovation. In the temporal dimension, treatment should be rigorously phase-stratified:
Hyperacute phase (0–3 h): Alongside large-vessel recanalization, adjunctive microcirculatory protective strategies—such as targeting pericyte TMEM16A—are essential to ensure that blood flow effectively reaches the tissue.
Acute/subacute phase (3–24 h): Interventions should focus on anti-inflammatory and blood–brain barrier protective effects, for instance by inhibiting microglial P2X7/NLRP3 or endothelial Piezo1 to interrupt the self-perpetuating injury cycle.
Recovery phase (days to weeks): Strategies must pivot toward harnessing and modulating calcium signals (e.g., optogenetically enhancing astrocytic Ca2+ waves) to promote neuroplasticity and repair.
On the targeting dimension, strategies must evolve from crude “blockade” to refined modulation, guided by several core principles: (i) Development of subcellular organelle-specific agents (e.g., MCU inhibitors): Given the difficulty of globally controlling cytosolic Ca2+, it is more pragmatic to target downstream effectors. Inhibiting the mitochondrial calcium uniporter (MCU), for instance, prevents mitochondrial Ca2+ overload and ROS burst without perturbing physiological cytosolic Ca2+ signaling. (ii) Uncoupling strategies: Drawing inspiration from Nerinetide, pathological Ca2+ influx can be selectively disrupted by interfering with protein–protein interactions (e.g., assembly of the STIM1–Orai1 complex) rather than completely occluding the channel. (iii) Network pharmacology-driven multi-target combination regimens. The integration of this spatiotemporal framework with precision targeting represents a pivotal forward-looking direction for advancing the clinical translation of next-generation neuroprotective agents in stroke.
Furthermore, the field of calcium overload research is burdened by a long-overlooked structural limitation: the vast majority of preclinical studies remain confined to neuronal cultures or focal ischemia models in young, healthy animals. These models fail to recapitulate the remodeling characteristics of calcium signaling under comorbid conditions such as aging, hypertension, or diabetes, nor do they incorporate real-world clinical variables—including hemodynamic fluctuations and barriers to cerebral drug delivery.
Establishing a reverse translational research loop—spanning clinical phenotyping, mechanistic validation, and intervention optimization—is a critical step toward bridging the gap between preclinical and clinical evidence. Specifically, priority should be given to the following initiatives: (i) Reconstruction of calcium signaling networks based on human stroke biospecimens; (ii) Validation and stratification of candidate targets in animal models with comorbidities; (iii) Coordinated development of imaging biomarkers (e.g., calcium-sensitive MRI probes) and liquid biopsy tools (e.g., calmodulin in neuron-derived exosomes) to enable non-invasive, dynamic monitoring of calcium overload burden.

7. Conclusions

In conclusion, calcium overload in ischemic stroke is far more than a simple disruption of ionic equilibrium—it constitutes a highly complex, multicellular, and dynamically evolving systemic pathological network. The repeated translational failures of the past decades have laid bare a fundamental deficit in our understanding of the spatiotemporal dynamics that govern this intricate cascade. A paradigm shift is therefore imperative: we must move beyond the obsolete neuron-centric logic of wholesale calcium channel blockade toward a new framework defined by pan-neurovascular unit (NVU) coverage, whole-course temporal stratification, and multi-level precision modulation. Neurons do not operate in isolation; indeed, emerging evidence suggests that non-neuronal players—such as pericyte TMEM16A, endothelial Piezo1, and glial P2X7 receptors—may contribute even more substantially to the calcium overload cascade than conventional neuronal targets. This recognition mandates a strategic reorientation toward comprehensive NVU protection, with interventions targeting astrocytic STIM1, microglial NLRP3 inflammasomes, and pericyte TMEM16A channels representing particularly promising and translationally tractable directions. Critically, post-ischemic calcium signals are spatiotemporally heterogeneous: in the hyperacute phase, they manifest as physical microcirculatory obstruction; in the acute phase, as biochemical toxicity; and in the recovery phase, as regenerative cues. Therapeutic strategies must therefore be time-sensitive, achieving a dynamic equilibrium between suppression and modulation tailored to the evolving pathological context. Importantly, the failure of clinical candidates does not invalidate the calcium hypothesis—it instead exposes the bankruptcy of reductionist intervention logic built on single targets, disregard for hemodynamic compromise, and neglect of physiological signaling. The translational gap has been further widened by our collective underestimation of hemodynamic influences, cerebral drug delivery barriers (particularly microvascular no-reflow), and the dual roles of non-neuronal cells under comorbid conditions.
Future breakthroughs will hinge on uncoupling strategies that preserve physiological Ca2+ fluxes, nanotechnology-enabled delivery systems capable of bypassing BBB and no-reflow obstacles, and systems biology-guided multi-target combinations that address the network nature of calcium dysregulation. Only when preclinical research critically interrogates the limitations of isolated molecular targets and integrates profound clinical insights into microcirculatory failure, systemic inflammation, and patient heterogeneity can we hope to bridge the chasm between bench and bedside. The development of truly effective neuroprotective and reparative therapies for stroke patients will ultimately depend on our ability to master calcium as a “fire of life”—harnessing its regenerative potential while averting its destructive force, and transforming the treatment of ischemic stroke from a trial-and-error endeavor into a science-informed art of precision modulation.

Author Contributions

Y.J.: Writing—original draft, Conceptualization. G.W.: Writing—review and editing. S.J.: Writing—review and editing. Y.W.: Writing—review and editing. Q.T.: Writing—review and editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition. M.L.: Writing—review and editing, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 82172173 to Mingchang Li), the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province (Grant No. 2025AFB173 to Qi Tian) and the Open Project of Hubei Key Laboratory (Grant No. 2023KFZZ017 to Qi Tian).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

Funding from National Natural Science Foundation of China and Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province is gratefully acknowledged. All figures were created with BioRender (biorender.com).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Abbreviations

AbbreviationFull TermAbbreviationFull Term
2-APB2-Aminoethoxyindophenyl BorateBBBBlood–Brain Barrier
CA6′-O-Caffeyl ArbutincAMPCyclic Adenosine Monophosphate
CaMCalmodulinCaMKIICa2XCalmodulin-Dependent Protein Kinase II
CASP3Caspase-3CCBCalcium Channel Blocker
CM-EM-137CRAC Channel Inhibitor CompoundCOXCytochrome c Oxidase
CRACCalcium Release-Activated Calcium ChannelCREBcAMP Response Element-Binding Protein
CSDCortical Spreading DepolarizationCX3CR1CX3C Chemokine Receptor 1
DAMPsDamage-Associated Molecular PatternsDRP1Dynamin-Related Protein 1
EGCGEpigallocatechin GallateEIF2αEukaryotic Initiation Factor 2 Alpha
EREndoplasmic ReticulumESCAPE-NA1Endovascular Stroke Therapy Followed by Neures
esNMDARExtrasynaptic N-Methyl-D-Aspartate ReceptorFAST-MAGField Administration of Stroke Therapy—Magn
GABAGamma-Aminobutyric AcidGenGenistein
GLT-1Glutamate Transporter-1GluN2AN-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Subunit 2A
GluN2BN-Methyl-D-Aspartate Receptor Subunit 2BGPCRG Protein-Coupled Receptor
GRP75Glucose-Regulated Protein 75GSK3βGlycogen Synthase Kinase 3 Beta
GsMTx4Grammostola spatulata Mechanotoxin 4GYRGlycine-Arginine-Tyrosine Peptide
IL-1βInterleukin 1 BetaiNOSInducible Nitric Oxide Synthase
INWESTIntravenous Nimodipine West European StrokeISIschemic Stroke
JNKc-Jun N-Terminal KinaseKXAKuaxiong Aerosol
MALT1Mucosa-Associated Lymphoid Tissue LymphomMAMsMitochondria-Associated Membranes
MCUMitochondrial Calcium UniportermGluRMetabotropic Glutamate Receptor
MICU1Mitochondrial Calcium Uptake 1mPTPMitochondrial Permeability Transition Pore
NCLXNaXCa2XExchangerNIHSSNational Institutes of Health Stroke Scale
NMDARN-Methyl-D-Aspartate ReceptorNONitric Oxide
NOXNADPH OxidasenNOSNeuronal Nitric Oxide Synthase
NVUNeurovascular UnitOGD/ROxygen-Glucose Deprivation/Reoxygenation
Orai1Calcium Release-Activated Calcium Channel PreP2X7Purineric Receptor P2X7
PDE2Phosphodiesterase 2PERKProtein Kinase R-Like Endoplasmic Reticulum F
Piezo1Piezo-Type Mechanosensitive Ion Channel CompPKAProtein Kinase A
PLA2Phospholipase A2PMCAPlasma Membrane Ca2XATPase
PMZPromethazineRIPostCRemote Ischemic Postconditioning
RODINRandomized Study of Nelonenadaz for IschemicROSReactive Oxygen Species
Ru265Ruthenium-Based MCU InhibitorSAINT IIStroke-Acute Ischemic NXY Treatment II Trial
SERCASarco/Endoplasmic Reticulum Ca2XATPaseSOD1Superoxide Dismutase 1
SOD2Superoxide Dismutase 2SOCEStore-Operated Calcium Entry
STM1Stromal Interaction Molecule 1TATTrans-Activator of Transcription Peptide
t-PATissue Plasminogen ActivatorTLK2Tousled-Like Kinase 2
TLR4Toll-Like Receptor 4TNF-αTumor Necrosis Factor Alpha
TrkBTropomyosin Receptor Kinase BTRPTransient Receptor Potential
TRPC6Transient Receptor Potential Canonical 6TRPM2Transient Receptor Potential Melastatin 2
TRPM4Transient Receptor Potential Melastatin 4TRPV4Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 4
UPRUnfolded Protein ResponseVDACVoltage-Dependent Anion Channel
VENUSVery Early Nimodipine Use in Stroke TrialVGCCVoltage-Gated Calcium Channel
ZO-1Zonula Occludens-1

References

  1. Millenaar, D.; Ragoschke-Schumm, A.; Fehlmann, T.; Raible, M.; Lochner, P.; Böhm, M.; Fassbender, K.; Keller, A.; Mahfoud, F.; Ukena, C. Ischemic Stroke-A Scientometric Analysis. Front. Neurol. 2022, 13, 893121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Golubnitschaja, O.; Polivka, J.; Potuznik, P.; Pesta, M.; Stetkarova, I.; Mazurakova, A.; Lackova, L.; Kubatka, P.; Kropp, M.; Thumann, G.; et al. The paradigm change from reactive medical services to 3PM in ischemic stroke: A holistic approach utilising tear fluid multi-omics, mitochondria as a vital biosensor and AI-based multi-professional data interpretation. EPMA J. 2024, 15, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pacinella, G.; Ciaccio, A.M.; Tuttolomondo, A. Molecular Links and Clinical Effects of Inflammation and Metabolic Background on Ischemic Stroke: An Update Review. J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13, 7515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Brauer, M.; Roth, G.A.; Aravkin, A.Y.; Zheng, P.; Abate, K.H.; Abate, Y.H.; Abbafati, C.; Abbasgholizadeh, R.; Abbasi, M.A.; Abbasian, M.; et al. Global burden and strength of evidence for 88 risk factors in 204 countries and 811 subnational locations, 1990-2021: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. Lancet 2024, 403, 2162–2203, Correction in Lancet 2024, 404, 244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Rajan, S.S.; Yamal, J.-M.; Wang, M.; Saver, J.L.; Jacob, A.P.; Gonzales, N.R.; Ifejika, N.; Parker, S.A.; Ganey, C.; Gonzalez, M.O.; et al. A Prospective Multicenter Analysis of Mobile Stroke Unit Cost-Effectiveness. Ann. Neurol. 2025, 97, 209–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Mizoguchi, T.; Maki, A.; Nakase, Y.; Okita, M.; Minami, Y.; Fukunaga, M.; Itoh, M. Neurological function is restored post-ischemic stroke in zebrafish, with aging exerting a deleterious effect on its pathology. Brain Res. Bull. 2025, 221, 111225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Martin, S.S.; Aday, A.W.; Allen, N.B.; Almarzooq, Z.I.; Anderson, C.A.M.; Arora, P.; Avery, C.L.; Baker-Smith, C.M.; Bansal, N.; Beaton, A.Z.; et al. 2025 Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics: A Report of US and Global Data from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2025, 151, e41–e660, Correction in Circulation 2025, 151, e1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jia, J.; Jiao, W.; Wang, G.; Wu, J.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, Y. Drugs/agents for the treatment of ischemic stroke: Advances and perspectives. Med. Res. Rev. 2024, 44, 975–1012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sharma, R.; Lee, K. Advances in treatments for acute ischemic stroke. bmj 2025, 389, e076161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhao, K.; Wang, P.; Tang, X.; Chang, N.; Shi, H.; Guo, L.; Wang, B.; Yang, P.; Zhu, T.; Zhao, X. The mechanisms of minocycline in alleviating ischemic stroke damage and cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2023, 955, 175903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Li, Y.-W.; Liu, Y.; Luo, S.-Z.; Huang, X.-J.; Shen, Y.; Wang, W.-S.; Lang, Z.-C. The significance of calcium ions in cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury: Mechanisms and intervention strategies. Front. Mol. Biosci. 2025, 12, 1585758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Jha, B.K.; Bhattacharyya, R. A Comprehensive Fuzzy Model for Understanding Neuronal Calcium Distribution in Presence of VGCC, Na+/Ca2+ Exchanger, Buffer, and ER Fluxes. Cell Biochem. Biophys. 2024, 82, 1367–1379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Pikor, D.; Hurła, M.; Słowikowski, B.; Szymanowicz, O.; Poszwa, J.; Banaszek, N.; Drelichowska, A.; Jagodziński, P.P.; Kozubski, W.; Dorszewska, J. Calcium Ions in the Physiology and Pathology of the Central Nervous System. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 13133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Rahi, V.; Kaundal, R.K. Exploring the intricacies of calcium dysregulation in ischemic stroke: Insights into neuronal cell death and therapeutic strategies. Life Sci. 2024, 347, 122651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hu, J.; Zhu, Y.; Pang, Z.; Li, X.; Zhang, H.; Li, X.; Gao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, P.; Zhou, Q. Low hydrostatic pressure promotes functional homeostasis of nucleus pulposus cells through the TRPV4/CRT/FA complex axis. Front. Med. 2025, 12, 1531907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Parajuli, B.; Doi, H.; Shigetomi, E.; Suzuki, H.; Saito, K.; Sawada, K.; Koizumi, S. Development of a label-free Ca2+ image sensor to visualize extracellular Ca2+ dynamics in the biological samples. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2025, 287, 117729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zhang, Y.; Zhang, G.; Chen, X. Elevated Calcium after Acute Ischemic Stroke Predicts Severity and Prognosis. Mol. Neurobiol. 2024, 61, 266–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Vijay Prabhu, S.N.; Tripathi, B.K.; Agarwal, Y.; Kabi, B.C.; Kumar, R. Association of serum calcium levels with clinical severity of ischemic stroke at the time of admission as defined by NIHSS score: A cross-sectional, observational study. J. Fam. Med. Prim. Care 2022, 11, 6427–6432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Meng, K.; Lei, X.; He, D. Association between serum calcium and in-hospital mortality in intensive care unit patients with cerebral infarction: A cohort study. Front. Neurol. 2024, 15, 1428868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Lu, Y.; Ma, X.; Tazmini, K.; Yang, M.; Zhou, X.; Wang, Y. Admission Serum Calcium Level and Short-Term Mortality After Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Secondary Analysis Based on a Norwegian Retrospective Cohort. Front. Neurol. 2022, 13, 889518. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fang, S.; Huang, W.; Qu, X.; Chai, W. The mitochondria as a potential therapeutic target in cerebral I/R injury. Front. Neurosci. 2024, 18, 1500647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Li, L.; Liu, S.; Wang, M.; Li, M.; Liu, Y.; Chen, H.; Chen, J.; Tao, W.; Huang, L.; Zhao, S. Gen inhibiting the Wnt/Ca2+ signaling pathway alleviates cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury. Sci. Rep. 2025, 15, 4661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Tang, J.; Duan, W.; Deng, P.; Li, H.; Liu, C.; Duan, Y.; Feng, M.; Xu, S. Cadmium disrupts mitochondrial distribution and activates excessive mitochondrial fission by elevating cytosolic calcium independent of MCU-mediated mitochondrial calcium uptake in its neurotoxicity. Toxicology 2021, 453, 152726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Peggion, C.; Barazzuol, L.; Poggio, E.; Calì, T.; Brini, M. Ca2+ signalling: A common language for organelles crosstalk in Parkinson’s disease. Cell Calcium 2023, 115, 102783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhu, H.; Zhou, H. Novel Insight into the Role of Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in the Pathogenesis of Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2021, 2021, 5529810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Loh, K.W.Z.; Liu, C.; Soong, T.W.; Hu, Z. β subunits of voltage-gated calcium channels in cardiovascular diseases. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2023, 10, 1119729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Zhu, M.-L.; Zhang, J.; Guo, L.-J.; Yue, R.-Z.; Li, S.-S.; Cui, B.-Y.; Guo, S.; Niu, Q.-Q.; Yu, Y.-N.; Wang, H.-H.; et al. Amorphous selenium inhibits oxidative stress injury of neurons in vascular dementia rats by activating NMDAR pathway. Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2023, 955, 175874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shkryl, V.M. Endoplasmic Reticulum Calcium Signaling in Hippocampal Neurons. Biomolecules 2024, 14, 1617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Díaz-Piña, D.A.; Rivera-Ramírez, N.; García-López, G.; Díaz, N.F.; Molina-Hernández, A. Calcium and Neural Stem Cell Proliferation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 4073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pathiriparambath, M.S.R.; Joseph, M.; Manog, M.; Thomas, V.; Tharayil, H.; Nair, L.V. Glutamic Acid Modified Gold Nanorod Sensor for the Detection of Calcium ions in Neuronal Cells. Chembiochem 2024, 25, e202400009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Shiratori-Hayashi, M.; Tsuda, M. IP3R1-dependent astrocyte calcium signaling in chronic itch. Neurosci. Res. 2023, 187, 40–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Choi, S.; Shin, H.; Hyun, S.Y.; Chung, G.; Kim, S.K. STIM1-Dependent Calcium Signaling in Astrocytes Controls Glutamate Accumulation and Ischemic Brain Injury During Acute Stroke in Mice. GLIA 2026, 74, e70110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liang, X.; Cao, C.; Liu, N.; Chen, D.; Liu, T.; Ma, H.; Liu, J.; Wu, T.; Niu, J. Induced neural stem cells ameliorate blood-brain barrier injury by modulating the calcium signaling pathway of astrocyte in cerebral ischemia-reperfusion rats. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 2025, 13, 1611226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Cho, J.; Lee, S.; Kook, Y.H.; Park, J.; Do Heo, W.; Lee, C.J.; Kim, H.-I. Optogenetic calcium modulation in astrocytes enhances post-stroke recovery in chronic capsular infarct. Sci. Adv. 2025, 11, eadn7577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Granzotto, A.; McQuade, A.; Chadarevian, J.P.; Davtyan, H.; Sensi, S.L.; Parker, I.; Blurton-Jones, M.; Smith, I.F. ER and SOCE Ca2+ signals are not required for directed cell migration in human iPSC-derived microglia. Cell Calcium 2024, 123, 102923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Martus, D.; Williams, S.K.; Pichi, K.; Mannebach-Götz, S.; Kaiser, N.; Wardas, B.; Fecher-Trost, C.; Meyer, M.R.; Schmitz, F.; Beck, A.; et al. Cavβ3 Contributes to the Maintenance of the Blood-Brain Barrier and Alleviates Symptoms of Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2024, 44, 1833–1851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zong, P.; Feng, J.; Li, C.X.; Jellison, E.R.; Yue, Z.; Miller, B.; Yue, L. Activation of endothelial TRPM2 exacerbates blood-brain barrier degradation in ischemic stroke. Cardiovasc. Res. 2024, 120, 188–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Fu, H.; Yu, Y.; Wang, S.; Xu, P.; Sun, Y.; Li, J.; Ge, X.; Pan, S. Piezo1 disrupts blood-brain barrier via CaMKII/Nrf2 in ischemic stroke. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2025, 82, 259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Gao, H.-M.; Chen, H.; Cui, G.-Y.; Hu, J.-X. Damage mechanism and therapy progress of the blood-brain barrier after ischemic stroke. Cell Biosci. 2023, 13, 196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sonobe, T.; Kakinuma, Y. Non-neuronal cell-derived acetylcholine, a key modulator of the vascular endothelial function in health and disease. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2024, 11, 1388528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Segal, S.S. Cell-to-cell communication coordinates blood flow control. Hypertension 1994, 23, 1113–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Negri, S.; Scolari, F.; Vismara, M.; Brunetti, V.; Faris, P.; Terribile, G.; Sancini, G.; Berra-Romani, R.; Moccia, F. GABAA and GABAB Receptors Mediate GABA-Induced Intracellular Ca2+ Signals in Human Brain Microvascular Endothelial Cells. Cells 2022, 11, 3860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Korte, N.; Ilkan, Z.; Pearson, C.L.; Pfeiffer, T.; Singhal, P.; Rock, J.R.; Sethi, H.; Gill, D.; Attwell, D.; Tammaro, P. The Ca2+-gated channel TMEM16A amplifies capillary pericyte contraction and reduces cerebral blood flow after ischemia. J. Clin. Invest. 2022, 132, e154118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Garbincius, J.F.; Elrod, J.W. Mitochondrial calcium exchange in physiology and disease. Physiol. Rev. 2022, 102, 893–992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Zong, P.; Feng, J.; Yue, Z.; Li, Y.; Wu, G.; Sun, B.; He, Y.; Miller, B.; Yu, A.S.; Su, Z.; et al. Functional coupling of TRPM2 and extrasynaptic NMDARs exacerbates excitotoxicity in ischemic brain injury. Neuron 2022, 110, 1944–1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Xie, D.; Zhang, P.; You, S.; Shen, Y.; Xu, W.; Zhan, C.; Zhang, J. Salidroside derivative SHPL-49 attenuates glutamate excitotoxicity in acute ischemic stroke via promoting NR2A-CAMKIIα-Akt/CREB pathway. Phytomedicine 2024, 134, 155583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zhang, X.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, G.; Yang, L.; Gan, J.; Jiang, X. Calpain: The regulatory point of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2024, 179, 117272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sharma, P.; Sharma, B.; Kharkwal, H.; Ghildiyal, S.; Patil, V.M. Selective inhibition of T-type calcium channel preserves ischemic pre-conditioning mediated neuroprotection during cerebral ischemia reperfusion injury in diabetic mice. Metab. Brain Dis. 2024, 40, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Kong, L.; Yang, H.; Yang, J.; Jiang, L.; Xu, B.; Yang, T.; Liu, W. Role of calcium overload-mediated disruption of mitochondrial dynamics in offspring neurotoxicity due to methylmercury exposure during pregnancy and lactation. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2025, 291, 117835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Li, Y.; Huang, H.; Gao, J.; Lu, J.; Kang, G.; Ge, Y.; Jiang, W.; Cai, X.; Zhang, G.; Liu, L. A TLK2-mediated calcium-driven cell death pathway links neuronal degeneration to nuclear envelope disruption. Nat. Commun. 2025, 16, 3419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Zhou, M.; Zhang, T.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, M.; Gao, S.; Zhang, T.; Li, S.; Cai, X.; Li, J.; Lin, Y. Effect of Tetrahedral Framework Nucleic Acids on Neurological Recovery via Ameliorating Apoptosis and Regulating the Activation and Polarization of Astrocytes in Ischemic Stroke. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 37478–37492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Shen, Z.; Xiang, M.; Chen, C.; Ding, F.; Wang, Y.; Shang, C.; Xin, L.; Zhang, Y.; Cui, X. Glutamate excitotoxicity: Potential therapeutic target for ischemic stroke. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2022, 151, 113125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Zhang, H.; Xie, W.; Feng, Y.; Wei, J.; Yang, C.; Luo, P.; Yang, Y.; Zhao, P.; Jiang, X.; Liang, W.; et al. Stromal Interaction Molecule 1-Mediated Store-Operated Calcium Entry Promotes Autophagy Through AKT/Mammalian Target of Rapamycin Pathway in Hippocampal Neurons After Ischemic Stroke. Neuroscience 2023, 514, 67–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Zhou, Y.; Qiu, T.; Wang, T.; Yu, B.; Xia, K.; Guo, J.; Liu, Y.; Ma, X.; Zhang, L.; Zou, J.; et al. Research progress on the role of mitochondria in the process of hepatic ischemia-reperfusion injury. Gastroenterol. Rep. 2024, 12, goae066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Kadier, T.; Zhang, Y.-G.; Jing, Y.-X.; Weng, Z.-Y.; Liao, S.-S.; Luo, J.; Ding, K.; Cao, C.; Chen, R.; Meng, Q.-T. MCU inhibition protects against intestinal ischemia-reperfusion by inhibiting Drp1-dependent mitochondrial fission. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2024, 221, 111–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Shi, Z.-Q.; Wen, X.; Wu, X.-R.; Peng, H.-Z.; Qian, Y.-L.; Zhao, Y.-L.; Luo, X.-D. 6′-O-caffeoylarbutin of Vaccinium dunalianum alleviated ischemic stroke through the PI3K/AKT/NF-κB pathway. Phytomedicine 2025, 139, 156505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Novorolsky, R.J.; Kasheke, G.D.S.; Hakim, A.; Foldvari, M.; Dorighello, G.G.; Sekler, I.; Vuligonda, V.; Sanders, M.E.; Renden, R.B.; Wilson, J.J.; et al. Preserving and enhancing mitochondrial function after stroke to protect and repair the neurovascular unit: Novel opportunities for nanoparticle-based drug delivery. Front. Cell Neurosci. 2023, 17, 1226630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zhang, X.-H.; Li, Y.; Jin, C.-Y.; Zhang, J.-L.; Yan, Y.-P.; Guo, J.-X.; Lu, X.; Pang, H.-Q.; Zhao, Y.-J. Role of mitochondrial metabolism in ischemic stroke and natural products intervention. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2025, 52, 568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Pisani, D.F.; Blondeau, N. Deciphering the brain glucose metabolism: A gateway to innovative stroke therapies. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2025, 45, 1635–1653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Chen, W.; Li, M.; Lei, X.; Cheng, Y.; Wu, X.; Sun, X.; Wu, Y.; Li, Z.; Luo, G.; Wei, M. Remote ischemic postconditioning alleviates cerebral ischemic injury through SERCA2/endoplasmic reticulum stress-mediated apoptosis. Microsc. Res. Tech. 2024, 87, 424–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Zong, P.; Li, C.; Feng, J.; Yue, Z.; Legere, N.; Yu, A.S.; Shah, F.; Perez, A.; Li, Z.; Jellison, E.; et al. TRPM2 overactivation drives hyperlipidemia-induced dysfunction of myeloid cells and neurovascular units. Cell Rep. Med. 2025, 6, 101998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Shui, X.; Chen, J.; Fu, Z.; Zhu, H.; Tao, H.; Li, Z. Microglia in Ischemic Stroke: Pathogenesis Insights and Therapeutic Challenges. J. Inflamm. Res. 2024, 17, 3335–3352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Shrouder, J.J.; Calandra, G.M.; Filser, S.; Varga, D.P.; Besson-Girard, S.; Mamrak, U.; Dorok, M.; Bulut-Impraim, B.; Seker, F.B.; Gesierich, B.; et al. Continued dysfunction of capillary pericytes promotes no-reflow after experimental stroke in vivo. Brain J. Neurol. 2024, 147, 1057–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Wang, J.; Xu, J.; Dong, Y.; Su, Z.; Su, H.; Cheng, Q.; Liu, X. ADP-ribose transferase PARP16 mediated-unfolded protein response contributes to neuronal cell damage in cerebral ischemia/reperfusion. FASEB J. 2023, 37, e22788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Yu, X.; Dang, L.; Dhar, A.; Zhang, R.; Xu, F.; Spasojevic, I.; Sheng, H.; Yang, W. Activation of ATF6 Signaling Confers Long-Term Beneficial Effects in Young and Aged Mice After Permanent Stroke. Transl. Stroke Res. 2025, 16, 1799–1810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lu, D.; Liu, Y.; Huang, H.; Hu, M.; Li, T.; Wang, S.; Shen, S.; Wu, R.; Cai, W.; Lu, T.; et al. Melatonin Offers Dual-Phase Protection to Brain Vessel Endothelial Cells in Prolonged Cerebral Ischemia-Recanalization Through Ameliorating ER Stress and Resolving Refractory Stress Granule. Transl. Stroke Res. 2023, 14, 910–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Peng, Y.; Zhou, L.; Jin, Y.; Wu, D.; Chen, N.; Zhang, C.; Liu, H.; Li, C.; Ning, R.; Yang, X.; et al. Calcium bridges built by mitochondria-associated endoplasmic reticulum membranes: Potential targets for neural repair in neurological diseases. Neural Regen. Res. 2025, 20, 3349–3369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Jia, Z.; Li, H.; Xu, K.; Li, R.; Yang, S.; Chen, L.; Zhang, Q.; Li, S.; Sun, X. MAM-mediated mitophagy and endoplasmic reticulum stress: The hidden regulators of ischemic stroke. Front. Cell Neurosci. 2024, 18, 1470144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Liu, Y.; Jin, W.; Zhou, H.; Wang, X.; Ren, H.; Yang, X.; Luo, K.; Dou, X. Role of mitochondrial Ca2+ in stroke: From molecular mechanism to treatment strategy (Review). Mol. Med. Rep. 2025, 32, 271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Rehman, S.; Nadeem, A.; Akram, U.; Sarwar, A.; Quraishi, A.; Siddiqui, H.; Malik, M.A.J.; Nabi, M.; Ul Haq, I.; Cho, A.; et al. Molecular Mechanisms of Ischemic Stroke: A Review Integrating Clinical Imaging and Therapeutic Perspectives. Biomedicines 2024, 12, 812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Deng, X.; Zhao, M.; Zhang, E.; Wei, L.; Gao, X.; Zhang, D.; Huang, Y. New insights into acute ischemic stroke from the perspective of spatial omics. Theranostics 2025, 15, 7902–7924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  72. Li, Y.; Schappell, L.E.; Polizu, C.; DiPersio, J.; Tsirka, S.E.; Halterman, M.W.; Nadkarni, N.A. Evolving Clinical-Translational Investigations of Cerebroprotection in Ischemic Stroke. J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12, 6715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Tan, Q.; Wang, X.; Xu, W.; Song, K.; Xiong, Y.; Jiang, Z.; Li, J.; Yu, Y.; Ye, W.; Shen, Z.; et al. Calpain inhibition as a novel therapeutic strategy for aortic dissection with acute lower extremity ischemia. Mol. Med. 2025, 31, 144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Madias, M.I.; Stessman, L.N.; Warlof, S.J.; Kudryashev, J.A.; Kwon, E.J. Spatial Measurement and Inhibition of Calpain Activity in Traumatic Brain Injury with an Activity-Based Nanotheranostic Platform. ACS Nano 2024, 18, 25565–25576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Chukai, Y.; Sudo, T.; Fukuda, T.; Tomita, H.; Sugano, E.; Ozaki, T. Proteolysis of mitochondrial calpain-13 in cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2024, 39, 101768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Poudel, P.; Shapovalov, I.; Panday, S.K.; Nouri, K.; Davies, P.L.; Greer, P.A.; Alexov, E. In Silico Screening for Small Molecules to Alter Calpain Proteolysis through Modulating Conformation Changes Induced by Heterodimerization. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2025, 65, 5528–5543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Xu, P.; Swain, S.; Novorolsky, R.J.; Garcia, E.; Huang, Z.; Snutch, T.P.; Wilson, J.J.; Robertson, G.S.; Renden, R.B. The mitochondrial calcium uniporter inhibitor Ru265 increases neuronal excitability and reduces neurotransmission via off-target effects. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2024, 181, 3503–3526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Bigham, N.P.; Novorolsky, R.J.; Davis, K.R.; Zou, H.; MacMillan, S.N.; Stevenson, M.J.; Robertson, G.S.; Wilson, J.J. Supramolecular delivery of dinuclear ruthenium and osmium MCU inhibitors. Inorg. Chem. Front. 2024, 11, 5064–5079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Zhang, X.; Liu, H.; Shi, Y.; Liu, Z.; Wang, Y.; Chen, S.; Yan, X.; Xu, R.; Ma, J.; Chen, Q.; et al. OPTN ameliorates chondrocyte apoptosis in temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis by modulating ER-mitochondria Ca2+ transfer. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2025, 157, 114796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Wen, B.; Xu, K.; Huang, R.; Jiang, T.; Wang, J.; Chen, J.; Chen, J.; He, B. Preserving mitochondrial function by inhibiting GRP75 ameliorates neuron injury under ischemic stroke. Mol. Med. Rep. 2022, 25, 165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Jara, C.; Torres, A.K.; Park-Kang, H.S.; Sandoval, L.; Retamal, C.; Gonzalez, A.; Ricca, M.; Valenzuela, S.; Murphy, M.P.; Inestrosa, N.C.; et al. Curcumin Improves Hippocampal Cell Bioenergetics, Redox and Inflammatory Markers, and Synaptic Proteins, Regulating Mitochondrial Calcium Homeostasis. Neurotox. Res. 2025, 43, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  82. Rozenfeld, M.; Azoulay, I.S.; Ben Kasus Nissim, T.; Stavsky, A.; Melamed, M.; Stutzmann, G.; Hershfinkel, M.; Kofman, O.; Sekler, I. Essential role of the mitochondrial Na+/Ca2+ exchanger NCLX in mediating PDE2-dependent neuronal survival and learning. Cell Rep. 2022, 41, 111772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Kodippili, K.; Hakim, C.H.; Burke, M.J.; Yue, Y.; Teixeira, J.A.; Zhang, K.; Yao, G.; Babu, G.J.; Herzog, R.W.; Duan, D. SERCA2a overexpression improves muscle function in a canine Duchenne muscular dystrophy model. Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev. 2024, 32, 101268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Liao, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Shi, Q.; Liu, P.; Zhong, P.; Guo, L.; Huang, Z.; Peng, Y.; Liu, W.; Zhang, S.; et al. Neuroserpin alleviates cerebral ischemia-reperfusion injury by suppressing ischemia-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress. Neural Regen. Res. 2026, 21, 333–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Song, T.; Li, J.; Xia, Y.; Hou, S.; Zhang, X.; Wang, Y. 1,25-D3 ameliorates ischemic brain injury by alleviating endoplasmic reticulum stress and ferroptosis: Involvement of vitamin D receptor and p53 signaling. Cell Signal 2024, 122, 111331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Zhang, Y.-Y.; Peng, J.-J.; Chen, D.; Liu, H.-Q.; Yao, B.-F.; Peng, J.; Luo, X.-J. Telaprevir Improves Memory and Cognition in Mice Suffering Ischemic Stroke via Targeting MALT1-Mediated Calcium Overload and Necroptosis. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2023, 14, 3113–3124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Yu, S.P.; Jiang, M.Q.; Shim, S.S.; Pourkhodadad, S.; Wei, L. Extrasynaptic NMDA receptors in acute and chronic excitotoxicity: Implications for preventive treatments of ischemic stroke and late-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Mol. Neurodegener. 2023, 18, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Tortella, L.; Santini, I.; Lozano, N.; Kostarelos, K.; Cellot, G.; Ballerini, L. Graphene Oxide Nanosheets Hamper Glutamate Mediated Excitotoxicity and Protect Neuronal Survival in an in vitro Stroke Model. Chemistry 2023, 29, e202301762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Park, D.-J.; Kang, J.-B.; Koh, P.-O. Epigallocatechin gallate improves neuronal damage in animal model of ischemic stroke and glutamate-exposed neurons via modulation of hippocalcin expression. PLoS ONE 2024, 19, e0299042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kang, J.-B.; Park, D.-J.; Koh, P.-O. Retinoic Acid Prevents the Neuronal Damage Through the Regulation of Parvalbumin in an Ischemic Stroke Model. Neurochem. Res. 2023, 48, 487–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Binkle-Ladisch, L.; Pironet, A.; Zaliani, A.; Alcouffe, C.; Mensching, D.; Haferkamp, U.; Willing, A.; Woo, M.S.; Erdmann, A.; Jessen, T.; et al. Identification and development of TRPM4 antagonists to counteract neuronal excitotoxicity. iScience 2024, 27, 111425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Yang, X.-M.; Yu, H.; Li, J.-X.; Li, N.; Li, C.; Xu, D.-H.; Zhang, H.; Fang, T.-H.; Wang, S.-J.; Yan, P.-Y.; et al. Excitotoxic Storms of Ischemic Stroke: A Non-neuronal Perspective. Mol. Neurobiol. 2024, 61, 9562–9581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Zong, P.; Lin, Q.; Feng, J.; Yue, L. A Systemic Review of the Integral Role of TRPM2 in Ischemic Stroke: From Upstream Risk Factors to Ultimate Neuronal Death. Cells 2022, 11, 491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  94. Chen, H.-J.; Chen, Y.-F.; Chen, J.-F.; Qian, K.; Zhu, Y.-Y.; Fang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Yang, T.; Wang, G.-W.; Huang, P.-T. Kuanxiong Aerosol Attenuates Ischemic Stroke Injury via Modulation of the TRPV1 Channel. Chin. J. Integr. Med. 2025, 32, 12–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Shekhar, S.; Liu, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhang, H.; Fang, X.; Zhang, J.; Fan, L.; Zheng, B.; Roman, R.J.; Wang, Z.; et al. Novel Mechanistic Insights and Potential Therapeutic Impact of TRPC6 in Neurovascular Coupling and Ischemic Stroke. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021, 22, 2074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Huang, Q.; Wang, X.; Lin, X.; Zhang, J.; You, X.; Shao, A. The Role of Transient Receptor Potential Channels in Blood-Brain Barrier Dysfunction after Ischemic Stroke. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2020, 131, 110647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Qiu, J.; Wang, Y.-H.; Wang, X.-M.; Chen, H.-S. PI3Kδ inhibition alleviates the brain injury during cerebral ischemia reperfusion via suppressing pericyte contraction in a TNF-α dependent manner. Exp. Neurol. 2024, 375, 114728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Dragoni, S.; Moccia, F.; Bootman, M.D. The Roles of Transient Receptor Potential (TRP) Channels Underlying Aberrant Calcium Signaling in Blood-Retinal Barrier Dysfunction. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2025, 17, a041763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Yu, L.; Liu, L.; Kang, Y.; Chen, Y.; Lv, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Mou, X.; Cai, Y. Mild photothermal activation of TRPV1 pathway for enhanced calcium ion overload therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2024, 282, 137192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Yazğan, B.; Yazğan, Y.; Nazıroğlu, M. Alpha-lipoic acid modulates the diabetes mellitus-mediated neuropathic pain via inhibition of the TRPV1 channel, apoptosis, and oxidative stress in rats. J. Bioenerg. Biomembr. 2023, 55, 179–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Pichardo-Rojas, D.; Pichardo-Rojas, P.S.; Cornejo-Bravo, J.M.; Serrano-Medina, A. Memantine as a neuroprotective agent in ischemic stroke: Preclinical and clinical analysis. Front. Neurosci. 2023, 17, 1096372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Dai, F.; Hu, C.; Li, X.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, H.; Zhou, W.; Wang, J.; Geng, Q.; Dong, Y.; Tang, C. Cav3.2 channel regulates cerebral ischemia/reperfusion injury: A promising target for intervention. Neural Regen. Res. 2024, 19, 2480–2487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Poore, C.P.; Yang, J.; Wei, S.; Fhu, C.K.; Bichler, Z.; Wang, J.; Soong, T.W.; Liao, P. Enhanced isradipine sensitivity in vascular smooth muscle cells due to hypoxia-induced Cav1.2 splicing and RbFox1/Fox2 downregulation. FEBS J. 2024, 291, 4265–4285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  104. Kecskés, S.; Menyhárt, Á.; Bari, F.; Farkas, E. Nimodipine augments cerebrovascular reactivity in aging but runs the risk of local perfusion reduction in acute cerebral ischemia. Front. Aging Neurosci. 2023, 15, 1175281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Bernard, P.J.; Bellili, D.; Ismaili, L. Calcium channel blockers’ contribution to overcoming Current drug discovery challenges in Alzheimer’s disease. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2024, 19, 21–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Tian, S.; Ma, C.; Zhu, Y.; Xu, Q.; Wu, J.; Qiu, Y.; Liang, T.; Ren, G.; Huang, Z.; Sun, X.; et al. A light-addressable potentiometric sensor-based extracellular calcium dynamic monitoring and imaging platform for cellular calcium channel drug evaluation. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2025, 267, 116814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Zhou, R.; Lin, K.; Leng, C.; Zhou, M.; Zhang, J.; Li, Y.; Liu, Y.; Ye, X.; Xu, X.; Sun, B.; et al. Chebulic Acid Prevents Hypoxia Insult via Nrf2/ARE Pathway in Ischemic Stroke. Nutrients 2022, 14, 5390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Sequeira, E.; Pierce, M.L.; Akasheh, D.; Sellers, S.; Gerwick, W.H.; Baden, D.G.; Murray, T.F. Epicortical Brevetoxin Treatment Promotes Neural Repair and Functional Recovery after Ischemic Stroke. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Viejo, L.; Rubio-Alarcón, M.; Arribas, R.L.; Moreno-Castro, M.; Pérez-Marín, R.; Braun-Cornejo, M.; Estrada-Valencia, M.; de Los Ríos, C. Synthesis and Biological Assessment of 4,1-Benzothiazepines with Neuroprotective Activity on the Ca2+ Overload for the Treatment of Neurodegenerative Diseases and Stroke. Molecules 2021, 26, 4473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Pomytkin, I.; Krasil’nikova, I.; Bakaeva, Z.; Surin, A.; Pinelis, V. Excitotoxic glutamate causes neuronal insulin resistance by inhibiting insulin receptor/Akt/mTOR pathway. Mol. Brain 2019, 12, 112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Krasil’nikova, I.; Surin, A.; Sorokina, E.; Fisenko, A.; Boyarkin, D.; Balyasin, M.; Demchenko, A.; Pomytkin, I.; Pinelis, V. Insulin Protects Cortical Neurons Against Glutamate Excitotoxicity. Front. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Kearns, K.N.; Liu, L.; Soldozy, S.; Sharifi, K.A.; Shaffrey, M.E.; Park, M.S.; Tvrdik, P. Microglia Modulate Cortical Spreading Depolarizations After Ischemic Stroke: A Narrative Review. Neurocrit. Care 2022, 37, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Dhir, N.; Medhi, B.; Prakash, A.; Goyal, M.K.; Modi, M.; Mohindra, S. Pre-clinical to Clinical Translational Failures and Current Status of Clinical Trials in Stroke Therapy: A Brief Review. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2020, 18, 596–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Ikonomidou, C.; Turski, L. Why did NMDA receptor antagonists fail clinical trials for stroke and traumatic brain injury? Lancet Neurol. 2002, 1, 383–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Lee, J.S.; Kang, H.G.; Ahn, S.H.; Song, T.-J.; Shin, D.-I.; Bae, H.-J.; Kim, C.H.; Heo, S.H.; Cha, J.-K.; Lee, Y.B.; et al. Nelonemdaz and Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke and Mechanical Reperfusion: The RODIN Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw. Open 2025, 8, e2456535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  116. Saver, J.L.; Starkman, S. Magnesium in Clinical Stroke; University of Adelaide Press: Adelaide, Australia, 2011. [Google Scholar]
  117. Saver, J.L.; Kidwell, C.; Eckstein, M.; Starkman, S. Prehospital Neuroprotective Therapy for Acute Stroke. Stroke 2004, 35, e106–e108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Ospel, J.M.; Goyal, M.; Menon, B.K.; Almekhlafi, M.A.; Zerna, C.; Nogueira, R.G.; McTaggart, R.A.; Demchuk, A.M.; Poppe, A.Y.; Rempel, J.L.; et al. Factors Influencing Nerinetide Effect on Infarct Volume in Patients Without Alteplase in the Randomized ESCAPE-NA1 Trial. Stroke 2024, 56, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  119. Hill, M.D.; Goyal, M.; Menon, B.K.; Nogueira, R.G.; McTaggart, R.A.; Demchuk, A.M.; Poppe, A.Y.; Buck, B.H.; Field, T.S.; Dowlatshahi, D.; et al. Efficacy and safety of nerinetide for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke (ESCAPE-NA1): A multicentre, double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2020, 395, 878–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Shuaib, A.; Lees, K.R.; Lyden, P.; Grotta, J.; Davalos, A.; Davis, S.M.; Diener, H.-C.; Ashwood, T.; Wasiewski, W.W.; Emeribe, U. NXY-059 for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. N. Engl. J. Med. 2007, 357, 562–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Ghozy, S.; Reda, A.; Varney, J.; Elhawary, A.S.; Shah, J.; Murry, K.; Sobeeh, M.G.; Nayak, S.S.; Azzam, A.Y.; Brinjikji, W.; et al. Neuroprotection in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Battle Against the Biology of Nature. Front. Neurol. 2022, 13, 870141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Minnerup, J.; Sutherland, B.A.; Buchan, A.M.; Kleinschnitz, C. Neuroprotection for stroke: Current status and future perspectives. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2012, 13, 11753–11772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Woods, J.J.; Nemani, N.; Shanmughapriya, S.; Kumar, A.; Zhang, M.; Nathan, S.R.; Thomas, M.; Carvalho, E.; Ramachandran, K.; Srikantan, S.; et al. A Selective and Cell-Permeable Mitochondrial Calcium Uniporter (MCU) Inhibitor Preserves Mitochondrial Bioenergetics after Hypoxia/Reoxygenation Injury. ACS Cent. Sci. 2019, 5, 153–166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  124. Novorolsky, R.J.; Nichols, M.; Kim, J.S.; Pavlov, E.V.; Woods, J.J.; Wilson, J.J.; Robertson, G.S. The cell-permeable mitochondrial calcium uniporter inhibitor Ru265 preserves cortical neuron respiration after lethal oxygen glucose deprivation and reduces hypoxic/ischemic brain injury. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2020, 40, 1172–1181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  125. Zhang, X.; Xin, P.; Yoast, R.E.; Emrich, S.M.; Johnson, M.T.; Pathak, T.; Benson, J.C.; Azimi, I.; Gill, D.L.; Monteith, G.R.; et al. Distinct pharmacological profiles of ORAI1, ORAI2, and ORAI3 channels. Cell Calcium 2020, 91, 102281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Kwon, J.; An, H.; Sa, M.; Won, J.; Shin, J.I.; Lee, C.J. Orai1 and Orai3 in Combination with Stim1 Mediate the Majority of Store-operated Calcium Entry in Astrocytes. Exp. Neurobiol. 2017, 26, 42–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Al-Hosni, R.; Kaye, R.; Choi, C.S.; Tammaro, P. The TMEM16A channel as a potential therapeutic target in vascular disease. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 2024, 33, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Xu, F.; Xin, Q.; Ren, M.; Shi, P.; Wang, B. Inhibition of piezo1 prevents chronic cerebral hypoperfusion-induced cognitive impairment and blood brain barrier disruption. Neurochem. Int. 2024, 175, 105702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Cisneros-Mejorado, A.J.; Pérez-Samartín, A.; Domercq, M.; Arellano, R.O.; Gottlieb, M.; Koch-Nolte, F.; Matute, C. P2X7 Receptors as a Therapeutic Target in Cerebrovascular Diseases. Front. Mol. Neurosci. 2020, 13, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Wilmes, M.; Pinto Espinoza, C.; Ludewig, P.; Stabernack, J.; Liesz, A.; Nicke, A.; Gelderblom, M.; Gerloff, C.; Falzoni, S.; Tolosa, E.; et al. Blocking P2X7 by intracerebroventricular injection of P2X7-specific nanobodies reduces stroke lesions. J. Neuroinflamm. 2022, 19, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Eyo, U.B.; Miner, S.A.; Ahlers, K.E.; Wu, L.-J.; Dailey, M.E. P2X7 receptor activation regulates microglial cell death during oxygen-glucose deprivation. Neuropharmacology 2013, 73, 311–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Muir, K.W.; Lees, K.R.; Ford, I.; Davis, S. Magnesium for acute stroke (Intravenous Magnesium Efficacy in Stroke trial): Randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004, 363, 439–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Hatamian, S.; Abdi, A.; Asl, F.S.S.; Tafazolimoghadam, A.; Tavasol, A.; Nejad, S.A.M.; Madadi, R.; Tajabadi, Z.; Dehghani, M.; Ahmadpoor, N.; et al. Examining the therapeutic potential and side effects of calcium channel blockers in mortality and morbidity of patients with stroke: A systematic review of pre-clinical and clinical studies. IBRO Neurosci. Rep. 2025, 18, 222–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Muir, K.W.; Lees, K.R. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot trial of intravenous magnesium sulfate in acute stroke. Stroke 1995, 26, 1183–1188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Rex, N.B.; Ospel, J.M.; McDonough, R.V.; Kashani, N.; Rinkel, L.A.; Buck, B.H.; Rempel, J.; McTaggart, R.A.; Nogueira, R.G.; Poppe, A.Y.; et al. Nerinetide Reduces Early Infarct Growth Among Stroke Patients Undergoing EVT Without Intravenous Alteplase. Stroke Vasc. Interv. Neurol. 2024, 4, e001034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Sun, F.; Zhou, J.; Chen, X.; Yang, T.; Wang, G.; Ge, J.; Zhang, Z.; Mei, Z. No-reflow after recanalization in ischemic stroke: From pathomechanisms to therapeutic strategies. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2024, 44, 857–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Hu, J.; Nan, D.; Lu, Y.; Niu, Z.; Ren, Y.; Qu, X.; Huang, Y.; Jin, H. Microcirculation No-Reflow Phenomenon after Acute Ischemic Stroke. Eur. Neurol. 2023, 86, 85–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Carlson, A.P.; Hänggi, D.; Macdonald, R.L.; Shuttleworth, C.W. Nimodipine Reappraised: An Old Drug with a Future. Curr. Neuropharmacol. 2020, 18, 65–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Khan, S.; Khan, M.M.; Badruddeen; Ahmad, U.; Akhtar, W.; Islam, A. Exploring NMDAR pathways in ischemic stroke: Implications for neurotoxic and neuroprotective mechanisms and therapeutic strategies. Naunyn-Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 2025, 398, 15173–15208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Egunlusi, A.O.; Joubert, J. NMDA Receptor Antagonists: Emerging Insights into Molecular Mechanisms and Clinical Applications in Neurological Disorders. Pharmaceuticals 2024, 17, 639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Sasmita, P.K.; Javier, R.M.; Shenelo, S.A.; Danika, A.; Geson, A.D.; Bramantyo, B.B. The long-term neuroprotective effects of calcium (Ca2+) modulation in ischemic stroke: A systematic review from animal models. Explor. Neuroprot. Ther. 2025, 5, 1004127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The functions of Ca2+. Under physiological conditions, precise Ca2+ homeostasis is maintained by channels, pumps, and buffers. Ca2+ signals regulate critical functions: neurotransmitter release and synaptic plasticity in neurons; neuroregulation and inflammation control in glial cells; and blood–brain barrier (BBB) integrity and vascular tone in endothelial cells.
Figure 1. The functions of Ca2+. Under physiological conditions, precise Ca2+ homeostasis is maintained by channels, pumps, and buffers. Ca2+ signals regulate critical functions: neurotransmitter release and synaptic plasticity in neurons; neuroregulation and inflammation control in glial cells; and blood–brain barrier (BBB) integrity and vascular tone in endothelial cells.
Ijms 27 02279 g001
Figure 2. The mechanisms and pathological role of calcium overload in IS. This diagram delineates the vicious cycle of calcium overload triggered by cerebral ischemia and its pivotal role in driving neuronal injury and death: Ischemia-induced ATP depletion and glutamate excitotoxicity initiate calcium overload. This triggers a destructive network: 1. Enzyme activation (e.g., calpain) damages cellular structures. 2. Mitochondrial dysfunction causes energy collapse and apoptosis. 3. Oxidative stress and 4. Neuroinflammation create vicious cycles that amplify the initial injury, leading to irreversible cell death.
Figure 2. The mechanisms and pathological role of calcium overload in IS. This diagram delineates the vicious cycle of calcium overload triggered by cerebral ischemia and its pivotal role in driving neuronal injury and death: Ischemia-induced ATP depletion and glutamate excitotoxicity initiate calcium overload. This triggers a destructive network: 1. Enzyme activation (e.g., calpain) damages cellular structures. 2. Mitochondrial dysfunction causes energy collapse and apoptosis. 3. Oxidative stress and 4. Neuroinflammation create vicious cycles that amplify the initial injury, leading to irreversible cell death.
Ijms 27 02279 g002
Figure 3. The translational gauntlet illustrating failures in calcium-targeted neuroprotection for IS. The schematic depicts the transition from preclinical promise to clinical failure, highlighting five critical mechanistic barriers. The potential efficacy of calcium modulators is often compromised by temporal delays relative to the hyperacute therapeutic window and dose-limiting toxicities. Furthermore, lack of target specificity, poor delivery across the BBB and microvascular no-reflow, and counterproductive systemic hemodynamic effects (e.g., cerebral steal phenomenon) collectively negate neuroprotective benefits in patient populations.
Figure 3. The translational gauntlet illustrating failures in calcium-targeted neuroprotection for IS. The schematic depicts the transition from preclinical promise to clinical failure, highlighting five critical mechanistic barriers. The potential efficacy of calcium modulators is often compromised by temporal delays relative to the hyperacute therapeutic window and dose-limiting toxicities. Furthermore, lack of target specificity, poor delivery across the BBB and microvascular no-reflow, and counterproductive systemic hemodynamic effects (e.g., cerebral steal phenomenon) collectively negate neuroprotective benefits in patient populations.
Ijms 27 02279 g003
Table 1. Summary of Calcium Overload Mechanisms in Different Cells.
Table 1. Summary of Calcium Overload Mechanisms in Different Cells.
Cell TypeTarget/MechanismPathological EffectIntervention Strategy
NeuronNMDAR (GluN2B subtype): Excessive activation of glutamate → increased calcium influx.Calcium overload → activates Calpain, CaMKII-DRP1, and TLK2 → mitochondrial division, nuclear membrane rupture, and apoptosis.Telaprevir (inhibits GluN2B); Memantine (eNMDAR antagonist) EGCG (up-regulates hippocalcin to reduce calcium toxicity).
TRPM2-esNMDAR coupling: Prolongs calcium influx.Amplify excitotoxicity and exacerbate neuronal death.TRPM2 inhibitors (ACA/TAT-M2).
AstrocyteDownregulation of GLT-1: Disorder of glutamate reuptake.Accumulation of glutamate in the synaptic cleave → prolongs neuronal excitotoxicity.SHPL-49 (up-regulated GLT-1); s-GO reduces glutamic acid release.
Calcium overload and ROS synergy: Oxygen-glucose deprivation/reoxygenation (OGD/R) induces injury.Aggravate the destruction of NVUs.tFNA inhibits calcium overload and ROS.
Microglial cellTLR4/AKT/NF-κB pathway: Calcium influx activates the inflammatory response.Release IL-6 and TNF-α → Disrupt the BBB; Recruit immune cells.Inhibit the TLR4 pathway; The absence of CX3CR1 alleviates calcium influx.
SOCE-mediated calcium overload: driving pathological activation.Aggravate neuroinflammation and neuronal damage.CRAC channel inhibitor
Vascular endothelial cellCavβ3 regulation: Affects tight junctions and BBB permeability.Calcium signal disorder → disruption of the BBB → brain edema.Target Cavβ3 to maintain BBB integrity.
TRPM2 overactivation: Endothelial calcium overload.Intensify the dysfunction of NVUs.TRPM2 inhibitors
Abbreviation: BBB, blood–brain barrier. s-GO, small-sized graphene oxide. tFNA, Tetrapod framework nucleic acid. SOCE, store-operated calcium entry. NVUs, neurovascular units.
Table 2. Summary of Calcium Overload Mechanism and Targets.
Table 2. Summary of Calcium Overload Mechanism and Targets.
Target/MechanismPathological EffectIntervention Strategy
Calpain systemDisrupt the ZO-1 of the BBB and increase permeability; Mediate the excessive activation of NMDA receptors; Cutting neuroprotective proteins such as TRPC6 and TrkB exacerbates neuronal death.Calpeptin (a Calpain inhibitor) alleviates neuroinflammation and promotes vascular regeneration.
Ca2+/CaM-CaMKII-DRP1 pathwayActivating DRP1 phosphorylation induces excessive mitochondrial division, leading to energy metabolism disorders, increased ROS and neuronal apoptosis.BAPTA-AM (calcium chelating agent) blocks the pathway and restores mitochondrial dynamic balance.
TLK2 kinaseTLK2 activation → nuclear membrane rupture and abnormal mitosis of neurons (mitotic disaster), and triggering apoptosis.Promethazine (TLK2 inhibitor) or Blebbistatin (myosin IIA inhibitor) alleviates nuclear membrane rupture.
Wnt/Ca2+ signaling pathwayActivate PLC → IP3 → intracellular calcium release → CaMKII amplification → calpain activation, oxidative stress and apoptosis.Gen down-regulates Wnt5a/Frizzled-2/p-CaMKII/IP3R; Upregulating SOD1/SOD2 alleviates oxidative damage.
PI3K/AKT pathwayCalcium overload inhibits PI3K/AKT, upregulates the ratio of Bax/Bcl-2, and activates apoptosis of CASP3.CA activates PI3K/AKT, inhibits Bax and reduces the release of inflammatory factors.
Mitochondrial MCU gating imbalanceReduction of calcium influx threshold; Insufficient phosphorylation of NCLX → mitochondrial calcium overload → inhibition of the respiratory chain, induction of mitochondrial ROS and mPTP opening.Ru265 (MCU blocker); Bay 60-7550 (Activate PKA → Phosphorylate NCLX); Nanotechnology delivery (such as TAT/GYR peptide targeting mitochondria).
ER SERCA dysfunctionDecrease in SERCA pump activity → ER calcium depletion → cytoplasmic calcium accumulation → activation of UPR to promote apoptosis; Calcium flows to mitochondria → mitochondrial calcium overload.RIPostC up-regulates the expression of SERCA2; SERCA2a gene therapy Neuroserpin inhibits the PERK-EIF2α pathway.
Glutamate-NMDA receptorGlutamate accumulation in the synaptic cleft → excessive activation of the GluN2B subtype → calcium overload → mitochondrial dysfunction and apoptosis.Telaprevir (inhibits phosphorylation of GluN2B); Memantine (eNMDAR antagonist) SHPL-49 (up-regulates GLT-1 in astrocytes and enhances glutamate clearance).
TRP channel (TRPM2/TRPV1)TRPM2 activation → calcium overload in endothelial cells → disruption of the BBB; TRPV1 overactivation →Ca2+ -dependent cytotoxicity.ACA/TAT-M2 peptide (TRPM2 inhibitor); KXA (down-regulating TRPV1). Hyperforin extract and resveratrol (inhibits TRPC6 degradation).
Energy metabolism disorders and membrane pump deactivationCalcium overload → inhibition of oxidative phosphorylation → ATP depletion → inactivation of PMCA/SERCA/Na+/K+-ATPase → a vicious cycle of calcium overload.Insulin pretreatment reduces calcium influx; Target mitochondrial energy metabolism (such as regulating NAD+ levels).
Abbreviation: BBB, blood–brain barrier. UPR, unfolded protein response.
Table 3. Comparison of preclinical and clinical outcomes of calcium-targeted intervention strategies in IS.
Table 3. Comparison of preclinical and clinical outcomes of calcium-targeted intervention strategies in IS.
CategoryTarget/StrategySpecific Drug/ExamplePreclinical FindingsClinical Outcomes and Key Reasons for Failure
Agents That Have Undergone Clinical TestingL-type CCBNimodipineInhibits VGCCs and reduces reperfusion injury in animal models.INWEST, VENUS and other trials showed no benefit or even worsened outcomes [104,113]. Key reasons: 1. Timing—delayed administration (typically >6 h) missed the critical window for early calcium overload. 2. Specificity—non-selective blockade interfered with normal neuronal signaling and cerebral autoregulation. 3. Side effects—systemic hypotension induced “steal phenomenon” in the ischemic penumbra, exacerbating injury.
NMDA receptor antagonistAptiganel,
Selfotel, Nelonemdaz
Blockade of NMDA receptor-mediated Ca2+ influx reduces infarct volume in animal models [114].Aptiganel and Selfotel were terminated due to psychiatric side effects (hallucinations, agitation) and increased mortality. Nelonemdaz failed to improve outcome in the RODIN trial [115]. Key reasons: 1. Timing—clinical administration occurred after the glutamate peak. 2. Specificity—early agents non-selectively blocked both synaptic and esNMDARs, interfering with physiological survival signaling. 3. Side effects—severe neuropsychiatric toxicity.
Magnesium ionMagnesium SulfateActs as a natural calcium antagonist; competitively inhibits NMDA receptors and MCU; neuroprotective in animal models.Large-scale trials (FAST-MAG, IMAGES) did not improve functional outcomes [116,117]. Key reasons: 1. BBB penetration—polar molecule with limited ability to cross an intact BBB and reach therapeutic concentrations in brain parenchyma. 2. Timing—even ultra-early administration (e.g., FAST-MAG) may still miss the critical window of the molecular cascade.
PSD-95 uncoupling agentNerinetide (NA-1)Disrupts the NMDAR–PSD95–nNOS death signaling pathway, reducing infarct size without affecting physiological signaling in animal models.ESCAPE-NA1 trial was neutral overall, but a beneficial effect was observed in the subgroup not treated with alteplase [118,119]. Key reasons:1. Drug interaction—plasmin generated during tPA thrombolysis degraded the peptide drug Nerinetide. 2. Specificity challenge—revealed unpredictable pharmacokinetics in complex clinical settings.
Free radical scavengerNXY-059Attenuates oxidative stress and indirectly influences calcium-related injury in animal models.SAINT II trial failed to meet its primary endpoint [120,121,122]. Key reason: Poor BBB penetration limited access to intracranial targets.
Novel Targets at Preclinical StageMCU inhibitorRu360, Ru265
Specifically blocks mitochondrial Ca2+ uptake, prevents mitochondrial Calcium overload, ROS burst and mPTP opening; protects neurons without affecting cytosolic Ca2+ signals in animal models [77,123,124].Not yet entered clinical trials. Considered a promising next-generation neuroprotective strategy targeting “delayed calcium dysregulation”. Ru265 shows neuroprotective efficacy; pro-convulsant effects at higher doses warrant caution (lower doses appear safer).
Astrocytic SOCE inhibitorSTIM1/Orai1 inhibitor (e.g., GSK-7975A [125])Inhibits aberrant Ca2+ influx following ER store depletion in astrocytes; corrects reversal of glutamate transporters and attenuates excitotoxicity [32,126].Not yet entered clinical trials. Targeting non-neuronal cells for indirect neuroprotection may avoid side effects of direct neuronal blockade. Main drawback: current inhibitors (e.g., GSK-7975A) lack sufficient selectivity, may partially affect Orai3 or other Ca2+ channels, leading to potential off-target effects and safety concerns.
Pericyte TMEM16A inhibitorAni9Inhibits ischemia-induced Ca2+-dependent chloride channel TMEM16A in pericytes; relieves capillary rigor and improves microvascular “no-reflow” without causing systemic hypotension [43,127].Not yet entered clinical trials. Addresses a key clinical problem—post-recanalization microcirculatory failure—with a novel strategy. Main drawbacks: although Ani9 is relatively selective for TMEM16A, its in vivo pharmacokinetics (brain penetration, half-life, long-term safety) remain insufficiently optimized; lacks large-scale multicenter validation and human safety data.
Endothelial Piezo1 inhibitorGenetic interventions or small-molecule inhibitorsBlocks mechanosensitive Piezo1 channel; inhibits CaMKII/calpain pathway activation; preserves tight junctions; attenuates edema and hemorrhagic transformation [38,128].Not yet entered clinical trials. Directly targets a key mechanism of BBB injury during reperfusion. Limitations: limited selectivity (not fully specific for Piezo1, may affect other mechanosensitive channels); insufficient brain penetration and long-term safety data; genetic approaches (e.g., knockout) are difficult to translate clinically; overall translational hurdles remain substantial.
Microglial P2X7 receptor inhibitorVarious small-molecule inhibitorsInhibits ATP–P2X7–NLRP3 inflammasome axis; reduces pro-inflammatory cytokine release and aberrant Ca2+ waves; attenuates neuroinflammation in animal models [129,130,131].Not yet advanced to pivotal stroke trials. Major challenge: suppressing excessive inflammation without compromising microglial physiological surveillance and reparative functions.
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jiang, Y.; Wang, G.; Jiang, S.; Wang, Y.; Tian, Q.; Li, M. Molecular Mechanisms and Targeted Intervention Strategies of Calcium Overload in Ischemic Stroke. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 2279. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27052279

AMA Style

Jiang Y, Wang G, Jiang S, Wang Y, Tian Q, Li M. Molecular Mechanisms and Targeted Intervention Strategies of Calcium Overload in Ischemic Stroke. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2026; 27(5):2279. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27052279

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jiang, Yuwei, Guijun Wang, Shengming Jiang, Youjun Wang, Qi Tian, and Mingchang Li. 2026. "Molecular Mechanisms and Targeted Intervention Strategies of Calcium Overload in Ischemic Stroke" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 27, no. 5: 2279. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27052279

APA Style

Jiang, Y., Wang, G., Jiang, S., Wang, Y., Tian, Q., & Li, M. (2026). Molecular Mechanisms and Targeted Intervention Strategies of Calcium Overload in Ischemic Stroke. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 27(5), 2279. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27052279

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop