Next Article in Journal
Correlation Between Dysbiosis and Atrial Fibrillation: What’s New?
Next Article in Special Issue
TLR9 Inhibition Shortly After Mating Increases Fetal Resorption and Alters B- and T-Cell Costimulatory Phenotypes in an Abortion-Prone Mouse Model
Previous Article in Journal
Mutagenicity and Repair of Acrolein Adduct to Cytosine
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Immune Cells in Preeclampsia

1
Department of Pharmacology & Toxicology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA
2
Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, MS 39216, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27(1), 74; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27010074
Submission received: 9 October 2025 / Revised: 16 December 2025 / Accepted: 19 December 2025 / Published: 21 December 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Immune Regulation During Pregnancy)

Abstract

Preeclampsia (PE), new-onset hypertension during pregnancy, is associated with chronic inflammation both in the placenta and systemically. PE is characterized by placental ischemia, which then results in the production and release of anti-angiogenic factors and inflammatory mediators. Inflammation in PE leads to placental, renal, and vascular damage, which contribute to the phenotype of hypertension and organ dysfunction during pregnancy. T cells, B cells, Natural Killer cells, and macrophages have all been shown to play a role in the inflammation present in the disease. T helper cells contribute to the chronic inflammation in PE. They also activate B cells, which produce agonistic autoantibodies against the angiotensin II type 1 receptor. Natural Killer cells are activated in PE and shift away from decidual Natural killer cells, which produce angiogenic factors, and toward cytotoxic Natural Killer cells, which contribute to tissue damage. Macrophages are polarized towards proinflammatory subtypes and contribute to tissue damage and inflammatory signaling in PE patients. As the immune system plays a role in the pathophysiology of the disease, it may be a potential target for therapeutic intervention to improve maternal and fetal outcomes during and following a PE pregnancy.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Preeclampsia (PE) is defined as new-onset hypertension after the 20th week of gestation alongside some form of organ dysfunction [1,2]. This organ dysfunction can manifest as proteinuria and kidney damage, cerebral effects and eclamptic seizures, liver dysfunction, abnormal blood clotting, and systemic endothelial dysfunction [1,2]. PE affects 5–7% of pregnancies in the United States every year and it is the leading cause of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality during pregnancy [2]. The cause of PE is unknown but preexisting conditions such as hypertension, kidney disease, diabetes, or obesity can increase the risk for developing PE [3]. There is also a familial connection involved PE, as daughters born after a PE pregnancy are more likely to develop PE themselves [4]. Treatments for PE include antihypertensives to manage blood pressure and magnesium sulfate to prevent seizures but there is no cure for the disease beyond the delivery of the fetal–placental unit. PE is also recognized as a state of chronic inflammation and increased oxidative stress, both of which contribute to the pathophysiology of the disease [5,6,7]. It has been proposed that maternal infection may be an initiating factor that causes the initial inflammation leading to inflammatory activation. A systematic review revealed a two-fold increased risk for PE associated with bacterial and viral infections, though the exact mechanism is unclear [8]. Normal pregnancies cause adaptations in the thymus leading to changes in T cell development and resulting populations to improve immune tolerance throughout pregnancy [9]. Many different types of immune cells have been implicated in the inflammation during preeclampsia, including T cells, B cells, natural killer (NK) cells, macrophages, and others [5,10,11,12]. T helper cells are activated in PE patients and are shifted toward the proinflammatory Th1 and Th17 cell types [13,14]. Macrophages also shift towards the proinflammatory M1 cell type and away from the regulatory M2 cell type during PE [15]. B cells in PE patients produce an agonistic autoantibody against the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1-AA), which binds to and activates the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) [16,17,18]. The aim of this review is to discuss the differences in immune cell populations between normal pregnancies and preeclampsia.

2. Th1/Th2 Cells

CD4+ T helper (Th) cells are an important component of the immune system, and are responsible for directing adaptive immune responses, with T helper type 1 cells (Th1) and T helper type 2 cells (Th2) representing two key functional subsets [19]. Importantly, Th1 cells induce a cell-mediated immune response by differentiating in response to interleukin-12, resulting in a pro-inflammatory environment from the production of cytokines such as interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α), and interleukin-2 (IL-2), which activate type 1 macrophages and support cytotoxic T lymphocyte responses [20,21]. In contrast, Th2 cells mediate humoral immune responses by differentiating in response to interleukin-4 (IL-4), resulting in the secretion of cytokines such as IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, and IL-13 to promote B cell maturation, IgE antibody production, and eosinophil activation [20,21]. These type 2 responses assist in the coordination of both humoral and eosinophil-mediated defenses against extracellular parasites from the activation of type 2 macrophages and the recruitment of eosinophils, basophils, and mast cells to an infection site [19]. However, during pregnancy, maintaining the functional balance between Th1 and Th2 cells is critical for immune regulation in order to protect both the mother and the developing fetus. Therefore, the balance between Th1 and Th2 immune responses is critical for sustaining maternal–fetal tolerance. Moreover, the relationship between these subsets is complementary because their cytokines can mutually inhibit each other’s differentiation, which assists in maintaining immune homeostasis.

2.1. Th1/Th2 Cells in Normal Pregnancy

During a healthy pregnancy, the maternal immune system undergoes dynamic changes to tolerate the semi-allogeneic fetus. Th1 cells are commonly upregulated in early pregnancy to support trophoblast invasion into the uterine spiral arteries, and Th1 cytokines become dominant during the peri-implantation period to assist in the trophoblast invasion rather than doing harm [22,23]. After placentation, there is a dynamic shift from Th1 to Th2 immunity occurring in the second and third trimesters, particularly at the maternal–fetal interface, to suppress Th1-mediated cytotoxic responses that could threaten fetal survival [22,23]. During this shift, Th2 cytokines facilitate the stimulation of other cells, such as cytotoxic T cells that have a vital role in promoting anti-inflammatory conditions, modulating immune cell function to support tissue remodeling, and protecting the fetus from harmful inflammation during pregnancy [23,24]. This new Th2-dominant environment facilitates trophoblast invasion, supports placental development, and helps establish an immune state that is essential for fetal growth, especially during the second trimester [23,24]. By maintaining this balance, Th2 cell-mediated responses aid in the prevention of pregnancy complications such as preeclampsia, miscarriage, and preterm labor that are associated with a shift back towards Th1 dominance and activation of NK cells and macrophages [24].

2.2. Th1/Th2 in Preeclampsia

Emerging evidence has demonstrated that a shift toward a Th1-dominant immune response contributes to systemic inflammation and placental dysfunction seen in preeclampsia. During normal pregnancy, a Th2 response supports immune tolerance; however, in PE, a shift toward Th1 polarization disrupts this balance, resulting in impaired placental function. Multiple studies have shown that a shift towards a Th1 dominance during pregnancy is responsible for the compromised placental function evident in preeclamptic women. In human studies, PE patients were shown to have a Th1 polarized shift and a reduction in Th2 cells in their peripheral blood profiles [25,26]. The increase in Th1 has also been linked with elevated concentrations of TNF-α and IFN-γ and lower expressions of transforming growth factor (TGF)-β1 and IL-10, which have also been associated with impaired trophoblast invasion, shallow placentation, and endothelial dysfunction compared with pregnant normotensive women [27,28]. Moreover, increased levels of Th1 pro-inflammatory cytokines have also been associated with other pregnancy complications such as intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and preterm birth [29,30]. Understanding the Th1/Th2 imbalance in preeclampsia not only elucidates its immunological underpinnings but may also offer potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets for early detection and intervention.

3. Regulatory T Cells

Regulatory T cells (Tregs) are a specialized subset of CD4+ T lymphocytes that arise primarily in the thymus (thymic Tregs, tTregs) during T cell development, although conventional CD4+ T cells can also differentiate into peripheral or induced Tregs (pTregs) in response to cytokines such as TGF-β in the periphery [31,32]. Tregs are defined by high expression of the CD25 and the transcription factor forkhead box P3 (FoxP3), which serves as a master regulator of their development and suppressive function [31,33,34]. Functionally, Tregs are central to maintaining immune homeostasis and self-tolerance, preventing autoimmunity and excessive inflammatory responses [32,33,35]. They suppress effector T cells and antigen-presenting cells through multiple mechanisms, including the secretion of inhibitory cytokines (IL-10, TGF-β, IL-35), metabolic disruption via IL-2 consumption, expression of CTLA-4 to downregulate costimulatory molecules on dendritic cells, and cytolysis of activated immune cells [36,37,38]. Beyond their role in immune suppression, Tregs are increasingly recognized for their tissue-specific specialization, adapting their phenotype to distinct microenvironments such as skin, gut, or reproductive tissues [39,40].

3.1. Regulatory T Cells in Normal Pregnancy

During pregnancy, Tregs are crucial for establishing maternal–fetal tolerance, allowing the semi-allogeneic fetus to develop despite continuous exposure to the maternal immune system [41,42]. The amount of Tregs increases rapidly at the maternal–fetal interface during early gestation, peaking in mid-pregnancy to support implantation and placental development [41,43]. Pregnancy-associated hormones, including progesterone, estrogen, and human chorionic gonadotropin, have been shown to promote Treg expansion and functional stability [44]. Within the decidua, Tregs interact with dendritic cells and trophoblasts to limit maternal effector T cell activation and promote an anti-inflammatory environment [45]. In addition to immunoregulation, Tregs contribute to early placental development by promoting trophoblast invasion and spiral artery remodeling [23,43,46,47]. Mechanistically, Tregs mediate tolerance by producing IL-10 and TGF-β, which suppress cytotoxic T cell responses, while also modulating NK cells’ activity and promoting angiogenesis [45,48,49]. The balance between Tregs and pro-inflammatory Th17 cells is especially important; an elevated Treg/Th17 ratio favors immune tolerance and successful pregnancy outcomes [50,51]. Experimental depletion of Tregs in mouse models leads to implantation failure and fetal resorption, further emphasizing their indispensable role [47,52]. In humans, reduced circulating or decidual Tregs have been linked to recurrent spontaneous abortion and other pregnancy complications [45,53,54].

3.2. Regulatory T Cells in Preeclampsia

Aberrations in Treg number and function are strongly implicated in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia [55,56]. Women with PE exhibit decreased proportions of FoxP3+ Tregs in both peripheral blood and decidual tissue, accompanied by reduced suppressive capacity [57]. This Treg deficiency is paralleled by an expansion of Th17 cells and other pro-inflammatory subsets, creating an imbalance that drives heightened immune activation [50,51,56,58]. Mechanistically, impaired Treg function contributes to defective trophoblast invasion, inadequate spiral artery remodeling, and endothelial injury through reduced IL-10/TGF-β production and increased pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-6 and TNF-α [59,60]. In vivo, the RUPP model has demonstrated that adoptive transfer of Tregs from normal pregnant rats improves hypertension and corrects the immune imbalance observed in PE [61]. Preclinical work suggests that therapeutic strategies aimed at boosting Treg activity, such as low-dose IL-2 administration, adoptive Treg transfer, may represent promising approaches to mitigate PE [56,61]. In addition, emerging strategies such as progesterone-mediated Treg induction and targeted stabilization of FoxP3 may offer further therapeutic benefit, although these approaches remain in early experimental stages [62,63,64].

4. Th17 Cells

IL-6 and TGF–β promote the differentiation of Th17 from naïve T cells [65]. T-helper 17 (Th17) cells, first identified in 2005, are a proinflammatory subset of CD4+ T cells that play important roles in autoimmune disorders, inflammation, and hypertension [66,67,68]. Since their discovery, Th17 cells have been linked to numerous inflammatory diseases, including rheumatic diseases, non-rheumatic autoimmune diseases, pulmonary diseases, atopic dermatitis, inflammatory bowel disease, and periodontal disease [66]. Recent studies have revealed that the transfer of Th17 cells to male mice results in characteristics of depression and learned helplessness, thus linking Th17 cells to the development of depression during pregnancy [69]. Th17 cells respond rapidly at inflammation sites, which serves as a link between the innate and adaptive immune cells [70]. They amplify neutrophilic responses, activate barrier epithelial cells, and stimulate antimicrobial peptide production [71]. Furthermore, Th17 cells primarily secrete IL-17 and IL-22. IL-17 notably enhances IL-6 production by the immune system [66,67,68]. While Th17 cells are critical for host defenses, their dysregulation has been linked to pregnancy-related morbidities such as preeclampsia, recurrent spontaneous abortion, and cholestasis of pregnancy. NK cells dampen inflammatory Th17 cells by secreting IFN-y to promote immune tolerance and successful pregnancy [72]. In vivo studies have shown that uncontrolled Th17 expansion can lead to fetal loss [72].

4.1. Th17 Cells in Normal Pregnancy

Pregnancy requires dynamic immune shifts, with pro-inflammatory responses in early pregnancy for implantation, anti-inflammatory states in mid-pregnancy for fetal growth, and pro-inflammatory again in late pregnancy for labor [73]. Tregs generally dominate over Th17 cells to prevent fetal rejection, though studies show inconsistent findings about whether circulating Th17 levels decrease, increase, or remain unchanged [51,74,75]. In normal pregnancy, Th17 cells secrete IL-17, which plays a vital role in angiogenesis and immune regulation. However, this role is not observed in the mouse placenta, suggesting that mouse models may not be reliable for investigating this function [76]. A balance between Th17 cells and regulatory T cells must be maintained because an excess in Th17 cell activity threatens the success of pregnancy [46]. Therefore, while dNK cells promote immune tolerance and vascular adaptation, Th17 cells provide immunity in a controlled way that complements the tolerogenic environment [13]. These factors collaborate to ensure pregnancy can proceed in a state of balance between resisting external pathogens and being permissive to the fetus [13,46,66].

4.2. Th17 Cells in Preeclampsia

Preeclampsia is strongly associated with abnormal trophoblast invasion and spiral artery remodeling [77]. Trophoblast invasion and vascular remodeling play a very important role during placentation; thus, inadequate remodeling results in decreased placental perfusion [78]. In addition, PE is associated with chronic inflammation and an imbalance among T-helper (Th) cell subtypes (Figure 1), particularly an increase in Th17 cells [61]. In vivo studies have shown that excess Th17 cells have been causing fetal loss [72]. Th17 cells are elevated in women with preeclampsia, and studies demonstrate that they synergize to impair placental function [67,79,80]. In studies done by Shields et al., the circulating Th17 population in normal pregnant rats was 1.16  ±  0.3%, which increased to 4.24  ±  0.8% after adoptive transfer of placental ischemia-stimulated Th17 cells [67]. This adoptive transfer significantly raised blood pressure from 96  ±  5 mmHg in NP rats to 118  ±  2 mmHg in NP+RUPP Th17 rats, while treatment with tempol, an antioxidant, lowered it to 102  ±  3 mmHg [67]. Furthermore, adoptive transfer of RUPP Th17 cells into NP rats significantly reduced pup weight (1.92 ± 0.09 g, p < 0.05) and placental weight (0.53 ± 0.01 g, p < 0.05), which is consistent with the IUGR observed in the RUPP control model of preeclampsia. Altogether, RUPP-induced Th17 cells play a direct role in mediating hypertension, inflammation, oxidative stress, and fetal growth restriction in preeclampsia [61,81].

5. B Cells

B cells are a population of lymphoid cells that express immunoglobulin (Ig) receptors and are critical for normal humoral immune function [82]. B cells are the antibody-producing cells of the immune system, and they contribute to immunological memory [83]. There are two distinct B cell populations, including innate-like B1 cells and classical B2 cells [82]. B1 cells arise from fetal progenitor cells and produce IgM antibodies that are polyreactive and bind to microbial antigens and self-antigens [84,85]. B1 cells produce these natural antibodies in the absence of antigen exposure and T cell help [86]. B2 cells are conventional B cells that undergo class switching and produce long-lasting, high-affinity IgG antibodies following T cell stimulation [87,88]. Mature B2 cells recognize their antigen through the B cell receptor (BCR) and internalize the antigen to present it via the MHC-II to a T cell receptor (TCR) on the surface of a T helper cell [89]. Upon T cell stimulation, B cells will transition into plasma cells, which are short-lived and produce large amounts of antibodies, or memory B cells, which are long-lived and provide long-term immune surveillance.

5.1. B Cells in Normal Pregnancy

Pregnancy poses a significant challenge to the maternal immune system. Throughout pregnancy, maternal immune cells must create an environment of immune tolerance to support the semi-allogenic fetus. Although B cells only make up 1–2% of immune cells in the decidual, they are important in supporting the pregnancy [90]. During healthy pregnancies, B cells produce protective antibodies that inhibit the cytotoxic effects of other maternal lymphocytes [91,92]. There is some evidence that these protective antibodies come from the B2 cell population [93], though this is not fully clear. These protective antibodies are asymmetric with an oligosaccharide residue that prevents antibody complexes from forming or activation of natural killer cells [94,95]. B cell deficiencies, particularly in the memory and regulatory B cell populations, can increase the risk for preterm birth, recurrent pregnancy loss, and PE [96,97,98]. Additionally, B cells support healthy pregnancy through immune regulation from B regulatory cells that produce IL-10, inhibiting inflammation at the maternal–fetal interface (Figure 2) [99]. IL-10 can suppress T helper 1 and 17 cell differentiation and reduce the production of proinflammatory cytokines TNF-α and IFN-γ [100,101]. Some B cells also produce IL-35 during normal pregnancies, which also contributes to the regulation of T cell activation [102].

5.2. B Cells in Preeclampsia

Both B1 and B2 cells have been implicated in the pathophysiology of PE through the production of AT1-AA (Figure 2) [16,17,103]. A study by Jensen et al. in 2012 first implicated B1 cells in AT1-AA production in patients with PE [18]. They showed that B1a cell numbers and AT1-AA activity were correlated, and they found that B1 cells cultured with serum from PE patients produced AT1-AA in culture. Recent work from our group has also implicated B cells in the pathophysiology of PE, specifically the B2 cell population. We first showed that Anti-CD20 treatment improved PE symptoms in the RUPP rat model of PE [104]. We also showed that the communication between T cells and B cells via the CD40-CD40 ligand is critical for the development of a PE phenotype in rats [105]. Additionally, the adoptive transfer of B cells, specifically B2 cells from RUPP rats into NP rats, recaptures PE pathophysiology [106]. B cell Activating Factor (BAFF) is required for B2 cell stimulation, development, and maturation [107], and we have found that blockade of BAFF improves blood pressure and immune activation in RUPP rats [108]. Most recently, we have shown that human CD19+ B cells can cause a PE phenotype in pregnant rats associated with AT1-AA production and complement activation [109]. Other groups have recently shown that PD-1, an immune inhibitory signal, is reduced on immune cells, and specifically on B regulatory cells in PE patients [110,111]. The PD-1/PD-1L pathway is believed to be important for normal maternal immune tolerance during healthy pregnancies [112], and disruption of a key B cell subtype in PE may contribute to the overall chronic inflammation seen in the disease.
Recently, we demonstrated that offspring of RUPP rats continue to produce AT1-AA as adults, indicating a memory mechanism for its production [113,114]. This is supported by data showing that postpartum PE women can produce AT1-AA for up to 7 years following the PE pregnancy [115,116]. Interestingly, we found that depleting maternal CD20+ B cells with Rituximab, which improves maternal symptoms, also inhibited long-term production of AT1-AA in the offspring, thus further supporting the role of memory immune response in long-term consequences of PE for mother and child [114].

6. Macrophages

Monocytes migrate from the circulation into tissues, where they differentiate into macrophages [117]. Macrophages are key cells of the innate immune system and serve as an important part of the first line of immune defense [5,118]. Like all immune cells, macrophages originate from pluripotent hematopoietic stem cells in the bone marrow and are derived specifically via a myeloid progenitor [118,119,120]. In response to infection, inflammation, or tissue injury, they respond to chemotactic signals and migrate to the affected site [118,121]. At these sites, macrophages ingest pathogens and cellular debris through phagocytosis, digesting them in phagolysosomes formed by the fusion of phagosomes with lysosomes [118,121]. Importantly, the degraded products can be presented on major histocompatibility complex II (MHC II) molecules to activate antigen-specific immune responses involving T and B lymphocytes [118,119,120]. Beyond their role in phagocytosis and antigen presentation, macrophages can undergo polarization in response to microenvironmental stimuli [121,122,123,124]. Polarization generates distinct functional phenotypes, most notably classically activated (M1) macrophages and alternatively activated (M2) macrophages [122,125,126]. M1 macrophages are induced by IFN-γ and or LPS and characterized by the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6. They typically express surface markers including CD80, CD86, TLR2, and iNOS [122,127,128]. In contrast, M2 macrophages are induced by IL-4, IL-13, or IL-10 and are associated with tissue repair and remodeling. M2 macrophages secrete anti-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-10 and TGF-β. Common surface markers that categorize macrophages as M2 are CD163, CD206, Fizz1, and Ym1/2. M2 macrophages are further divided into M2a, M2b, M2c, and M2d subcategories [122].

6.1. Macrophages in Normal Pregnancy

During pregnancy, decidual macrophages, which are maternal macrophages that reside in the decidua, contribute to spiral artery remodeling by producing angiogenic factors such as Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) and Placental Growth Factor (PlGF) [5,129]. They make up approximately 20–30% of decidual leukocytes in a healthy pregnancy [5,122]. In addition to decidual macrophages, Hofbauer cells, the fetal placental macrophages located within the chorionic villi, also play important roles in placental development and immune regulation [130,131,132,133].
Beyond their roles in placental development and immune regulation, macrophage polarization shifts dynamically across gestation. M1 macrophages predominate in the first trimester (<12 weeks), supporting embryo implantation, placental formation, and early development [5,15,134]. As placental formation and trophoblast invasion progress, both M1 and M2 macrophages are present [5,134]. After the placenta is fully developed in the second trimester, M2 macrophages predominate until labor, when a shift back toward M1 macrophages occurs. Maintaining this appropriate balance between M1 and M2 polarization has been shown to be essential for preserving immune tolerance and sustaining a healthy pregnancy after implantation [5,122].

6.2. Macrophages in Preeclampsia

Disruptions in this carefully regulated balance of macrophage polarization have been implicated in pregnancy complications, such as preeclampsia, where altered macrophage function has been shown to play a role in the impairment of placentation and heightened inflammation (Figure 3) [5,122,127,128,135]. As mentioned earlier, in a healthy pregnancy, macrophages undergo a shift from M1 dominance in early gestation toward an M2 phenotype that supports trophoblast invasion and vascular remodeling [135]. In preeclampsia, this transition is impaired, with an increase of M1 macrophages and a reduction of M2 macrophages [15,136]. This imbalance constrains extravillous trophoblast invasion and spiral artery remodeling, partly through excessive secretion of inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α and IL-1β and reduced production of the anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-10 [137,138]. Preclinical studies suggest that re-polarizing macrophages toward an M2 phenotype, through interventions such as mesenchymal stromal cell factors, statins, or cytokine modulation, may improve placental function and maternal outcomes [139,140,141,142].

7. Natural Killer Cells

NK cells are a type of white blood cell that play a significant role in the body’s line of defense. Unlike T and B cells, they do not require prior sensitization to recognize their targets [77]. Once activated, they release cytotoxic granules that contain perforin and granzymes, which induce apoptosis. They also secrete cytokines such as interferon-gamma and interferon-alpha to activate macrophages and dendritic cells to enhance the adaptive immune responses. Natural killer cells are found in various places, including the bone marrow, liver, uterus, spleen, and lungs. In humans, they are classified as CD3- CD56+ lymphocytes and can be distributed into two subtypes according to CD56 and CD16 expression. Uterine and decidual NK cells have higher CD56 density and less CD16 expression [143]. Additionally, they have larger granules compared to peripheral NK cells. Natural killer cells with larger granules are better cytokine producers, so this explains why the uNK cells are weakly cytolytic [144,145]. Uterine NK cells make up 50–70% of decidual lymphocytes in early pregnancy. They are essential for decidualization, a process that prepares the endometrium for embryo implantation by fostering placental development and modulating maternal immunity to prevent fetal rejection [146]. Decidual NK (dNK) cells are a subset of uterine natural killer (uNK) cells that differentiate in the decidua during early pregnancy. These two terms are often used interchangeably; however, uNK is a broader term that includes uterine NK cells across species, and dNK specifically refers to human decidual NK cells. They support placental development and spiral artery remodeling while maintaining reduced cytotoxicity to ensure maternal–fetal tolerance [147].

7.1. Natural Killer Cells in Normal Pregnancy

In normal pregnancy, the maternal–fetal interface is composed of various immune cells, including dNK cells, macrophages, T cells, dendritic cells, B cells, and NKT cells [148]. It is where the mother’s uterine tissue (decidua) and the fetus’s placenta come into direct contact. This enables nutrient exchange, waste removal, and protection against infection. In early pregnancy, dNK cells have the highest expression level in the decidua [143]. These cells are distinct from peripheral NK cells in that they display low cytotoxicity and, conversely, rely on cytokine and growth factor secretion to achieve their functions [149]. Decidual NK cells are notable in their ability to interact with trophoblasts through inhibitory receptors such as KIRs and NKG2A to prevent immune reactions that may be harmful to the fetus [150]. In addition to this critical role, dNK cells secrete angiogenic factors including VEGF, PlGF, Ang I, and Ang II, which help remodel the spiral arteries in order to ensure adequate blood flow to the placenta (Figure 4) [149]. They also produce cytokines such as IFN-γ, IL-8, and IP-10, that carefully regulate trophoblast invasion as well as local inflammation in a way that supports the development of the placenta [149]. In studies done by Wang et al., uNK and dNK cells significantly promoted trophoblast proliferation through the production of IL-22, which has been shown to promote survival of human trophoblasts [151]. Moreover, coculture of uNK cells with the HTR8 cell line significantly promoted trophoblast invasion through the secretion of IL-8 and HGF [152]. Decidual NK cells directly contribute to fetal growth by releasing factors that promote the development of the embryo, underscoring the shift of NK cells from killer cells in the surrounding areas to regulators within the uterus [149].

7.2. Natural Killer Cells in Preeclampsia

The role of uNK and dNK cells in preeclampsia is complex. While some studies report that dNK cell numbers are significantly increased in preeclampsia, others find them decreased [153,154,155,156,157]. Thus, absolute cell counts may be less informative than examining the abnormal activation and functional changes of NK cells. In PE, peripheral and decidual NK cells undergo a type 1 shift, which reduces their ability to regulate spiral artery remodeling. This leads to abnormal placental vascularization and ischemia [150]. This polarization occurs independently of oxidative stress because treatment with tempol did not attenuate cNK activation in the placenta of NP rats receiving RUPP Th17 cells. Additionally, depletion of NK cells in RUPP rats significantly reduced the hypertensive response to placental ischemia. Therefore, RUPP-stimulated cNK cells directly increased blood pressure [150]. Al Omar et al. demonstrated that in vitro stimulation with IL-17 induced proliferation and increased perforin expression in human NK cells [158]. These findings suggest that there is an interplay between Th17 and NK cells; both the innate and the adaptive immune systems are involved in the development of the maternal systemic inflammation seen in women with preeclampsia [79]. Moreover, studies by Pazmany et al. revealed that patients with severe preeclampsia had reduced expression of Human Leukocyte Antigen-G (HLA-G) molecules [159]. These molecules, along with HLA-C and HLA-E, are expressed by extravillous trophoblasts and bound by NK cell receptors. Specifically, HLA-G protects trophoblasts from dNK cell lysis and is bound by NK cell receptor KIR2DL4 [160]. With HLA-G reduced, the semi-allogeneic fetus is left with limited protection against maternal immune responses, leading to impaired trophoblast invasion [161].

8. Sub-Characterizations of Preeclampsia

PE can be characterized as mild or severe based on the degree of the symptoms. Severe PE is diagnosed when blood pressure reaches >160/110 mmHg with signs of end-organ damage. PE is further divided into classifications of early onset or late onset based on diagnosis before or after 34 weeks of gestation [1,162]. Early onset PE carries a higher risk for maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Early onset PE can be considered a different disease as it is associated with a distinct genetic profile and changes in immune regulation [163]. Toll-Like Receptor 4 mutations have been identified in early-onset PE patients, and these patients also typically have higher levels of inflammatory biomarkers such as IL-6 and C-Reactive Protein [164]. This suggests that pro-inflammatory cells and signaling may contribute to the development of early onset PE as well as the increased severity in this form of the disease.

9. Clinical Context

Currently, the only “cure” for PE is the delivery of the fetal–placental unit. Treatment for PE focuses on managing symptoms with antihypertensives, such as labetalol, used to control blood pressure, and magnesium sulfate is used to prevent seizures [1]. Aspirin has also been investigated as a way to prevent PE in pregnancies that are considered higher risk for PE [165]. Targeting immune cells or mediators may be a viable strategy to improve symptoms and/or reduce the risks of PE. In animal models, immune targeting therapeutics such as etanercept, a TNF-α inhibitor; Rituximab, an anti-CD20 chemotherapeutic; ‘n7AAc’, an AT1-AA inhibiting peptide; and progesterone-induced blocking factor, a lymphocyte suppressor, all improve PE outcomes [81,114,166,167].

10. Conclusions

Immune cells play a critical role in normal pregnancy through promoting successful implantation and tolerance at the maternal–fetal interface. However, dysregulation of the immune system leading to chronic inflammatory activation is implicated in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. T cells, B cells, Natural killer cells, macrophages, and other immune cells present in the maternal circulation and at the maternal decidua can all contribute to preeclampsia pathophysiology through the production of autoantibodies and cytokines, as well as causing tissue damage in the vasculature, kidney, and placenta.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization: N.C. and B.L.; writing—original draft preparation: N.C., M.R., H.N. and E.D.; writing—review and editing: N.C., D.C. and B.L.; visualization: N.C.; supervision: D.C. and B.L.; funding acquisition: N.C., D.C. and B.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This review was supported by NIH Grants R01HL170622, P20GM121334, U54HL170290, F32HD118681, and PhRMA Foundation PFTR1329197.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study. Data sharing is not applicable to this article.

Acknowledgments

Graphical Abstract and figures were made with BioRender.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Brown, M.A.; Magee, L.A.; Kenny, L.C.; Karumanchi, S.A.; McCarthy, F.P.; Saito, S.; Hall, D.R.; Warren, C.E.; Adoyi, G.; Ishaku, S.; et al. Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy: ISSHP classification, diagnosis, and management recommendations for international practice. Hypertension 2018, 72, 24–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  2. Gestational hypertension and preeclampsia: ACOG practice bulletin, number 222. Obstet. Gynecol. 2020, 135, e237–e260. [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  3. Shiozaki, A.; Saito, S. Risk factors for preeclampsia. In Preeclampsia: Basic, Genomic, and Clinical; Springer: Singapore, 2018; pp. 3–25. [Google Scholar]
  4. Dekker, G.A. Risk factors for preeclampsia. Clin. Obstet. Gynecol. 1999, 42, 422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  5. Deer, E.; Herrock, O.; Campbell, N.; Cornelius, D.; Fitzgerald, S.; Amaral, L.M.; LaMarca, B. The role of immune cells and mediators in preeclampsia. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2023, 19, 257–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  6. Redman, C.W.; Sacks, G.P.; Sargent, I.L. Preeclampsia: An excessive maternal inflammatory response to pregnancy. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1999, 180, 499–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  7. Chiarello, D.I.; Abad, C.; Rojas, D.; Toledo, F.; Vázquez, C.M.; Mate, A.; Sobrevia, L.; Marín, R. Oxidative stress: Normal pregnancy versus preeclampsia. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2020, 1866, 165354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  8. Rustveld, L.O.; Kelsey, S.F.; Sharma, R. Association between maternal infections and preeclampsia: A systematic review of epidemiologic studies. Matern. Child Health J. 2008, 12, 223–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  9. Yang, L.; Wang, X.; Zhang, L. Maternal Thymus Adaptations and Hormone Regulation During Pregnancy. Cells 2025, 14, 1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  10. Saito, S.; Shiozaki, A.; Nakashima, A.; Sakai, M.; Sasaki, Y. The role of the immune system in preeclampsia. Mol. Asp. Med. 2007, 28, 192–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  11. Fukui, A.; Yokota, M.; Funamizu, A.; Nakamua, R.; Fukuhara, R.; Yamada, K.; Kimura, H.; Fukuyama, A.; Kamoi, M.; Tanaka, K.; et al. Changes of NK cells in preeclampsia. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2012, 67, 278–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  12. Campbell, N.; Deer, E.; Herrock, O.; LaMarca, B. The Role of Different Lymphoid Cell Populations in Preeclampsia Pathophysiology. Kidney360 2022, 3, 1785–1794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  13. Saito, S.; Nakashima, A.; Shima, T.; Ito, M. Th1/Th2/Th17 and regulatory T-cell paradigm in pregnancy. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2010, 63, 601–610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  14. Saito, S.; Tsuda, S.; Nakashima, A. T cell immunity and the etiology and pathogenesis of preeclampsia. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2023, 159, 104125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  15. Schonkeren, D.; van der Hoorn, M.-L.; Khedoe, P.; Swings, G.; van Beelen, E.; Claas, F.; van Kooten, C.; de Heer, E.; Scherjon, S. Differential Distribution and Phenotype of Decidual Macrophages in Preeclamptic versus Control Pregnancies. Am. J. Pathol. 2011, 178, 709–717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  16. Wallukat, G.; Homuth, V.; Fischer, T.; Lindschau, C.; Horstkamp, B.; Jüpner, A.; Baur, E.; Nissen, E.; Vetter, K.; Neichel, D. Patients with preeclampsia develop agonistic autoantibodies against the angiotensin AT 1 receptor. J. Clin. Investig. 1999, 103, 945–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  17. Campbell, N.; LaMarca, B.; Cunningham, M.W., Jr. The role of agonistic autoantibodies to the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1-AA) in pathophysiology of preeclampsia. Curr. Pharm. Biotechnol. 2018, 19, 781–785. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  18. Jensen, F.; Wallukat, G.; Costa, S.-D.; Dechend, R.; Zenclussen, A. Peripheral CD19+ CD5+ B-1a B cells are increased in patients with preeclampsia and secrete AT1-AA antibodies. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2012, 1, 110–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  19. Zhu, X.; Zhu, J. CD4 T helper cell subsets and related human immunological disorders. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 8011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  20. Piccinni, M.-P.; Raghupathy, R.; Saito, S.; Szekeres-Bartho, J. Cytokines, hormones and cellular regulatory mechanisms favoring successful reproduction. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 717808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  21. Crants, S.; Yin, S.; Andrusier, M.A.; Reddy, R.; Ginsburg, E.S. The Role of Cytokines in Early Pregnancy: Fertilization, Implantation, and Maintenance. Curr. Obstet. Gynecol. Rep. 2024, 13, 59–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  22. dos Santos Fagundes, I.; Brendler, E.P.; Nunes Erthal, I.; Eder Ribeiro, R.J.; Caron-Lienert, R.S.; Machado, D.C.; Pinheiro da Costa, B.E.; Poli-de-Figueiredo, C.E. Total Th1/Th2 cytokines profile from peripheral blood lymphocytes in normal pregnancy and preeclampsia syndrome. Hypertens. Pregnancy 2022, 41, 15–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  23. Rao, V.A.; Kurian, N.K.; Rao, K.A. Cytokines, NK cells and regulatory T cell functions in normal pregnancy and reproductive failures. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2023, 89, e13667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  24. Esparvarinha, M.; Madadi, S.; Aslanian-Kalkhoran, L.; Nickho, H.; Dolati, S.; Pia, H.; Danaii, S.; Taghavi, S.; Yousefi, M. Dominant immune cells in pregnancy and pregnancy complications: T helper cells (TH1/TH2, TH17/Treg cells), NK cells, MDSCs, and the immune checkpoints. Cell Biol. Int. 2023, 47, 507–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  25. Wang, J.; Wen, Z.Q.; Cheng, X.-Y.; Mei, T.Y.; Chen, Z.-F.; Su, L.-X. siRNA-mediated knockdown of T-bet and RORγt contributes to decreased inflammation in pre-eclampsia. Mol. Med. Rep. 2017, 16, 6368–6375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  26. Shen, C.; Song, Y.; Fan, W.; Guo, X.; Li, J.; Zhao, R. Changes in expression levels of immune cells and inflammatory cytokines in pre-eclampsia patients before and after delivery. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2023, 156, 103812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  27. Ribeiro, V.R.; Romao-Veiga, M.; Nunes, P.R.; Matias, M.L.; Peracoli, J.C.; Peracoli, M.T.S. Vitamin D modulates the transcription factors of T cell subsets to anti-inflammatory and regulatory profiles in preeclampsia. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2021, 101, 108366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  28. Liu, A.; Wang, H.; Gao, X. A correlation analysis of Th1/Th2 cells in preeclampsia patients. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Med. 2019, 12, 12868–12873. [Google Scholar]
  29. Mor, G.; Abrahams, V.M. Potential role of macrophages as immunoregulators of pregnancy. Reprod. Biol. Endocrinol. 2003, 1, 119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  30. Geldenhuys, J.; Rossouw, T.M.; Lombaard, H.A.; Ehlers, M.M.; Kock, M.M. Disruption in the regulation of immune responses in the placental subtype of preeclampsia. Front. Immunol. 2018, 9, 1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  31. Workman, C.J.; Szymczak-Workman, A.L.; Collison, L.W.; Pillai, M.R.; Vignali, D.A. The development and function of regulatory T cells. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2009, 66, 2603–2622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  32. Corthay, A. How do regulatory T cells work? Scand. J. Immunol. 2009, 70, 326–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  33. Sakaguchi, S.; Yamaguchi, T.; Nomura, T.; Ono, M. Regulatory T Cells and Immune Tolerance. Cell 2008, 133, 775–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  34. Josefowicz, S.Z.; Lu, L.-F.; Rudensky, A.Y. Regulatory T Cells: Mechanisms of Differentiation and Function. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2012, 30, 531–564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  35. Wang, K.; Fu, W. Transcriptional regulation of Treg homeostasis and functional specification. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2020, 77, 4269–4287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  36. Goswami, T.K.; Singh, M.; Dhawan, M.; Mitra, S.; Emran, T.B.; Rabaan, A.A.; Mutair, A.A.; Alawi, Z.A.; Alhumaid, S.; Dhama, K. Regulatory T cells (Tregs) and their therapeutic potential against autoimmune disorders—Advances and challenges. Hum. Vaccin. Immunother. 2022, 18, 2035117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  37. Arellano, B.; Graber, D.J.; Sentman, C.L. Regulatory T cell-based therapies for autoimmunity. Discov. Med. 2016, 22, 73–80. [Google Scholar]
  38. Bettini, M.; Vignali, D.A. Regulatory T cells and inhibitory cytokines in autoimmunity. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2009, 21, 612–618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  39. Astarita, J.L.; Dominguez, C.X.; Tan, C.; Guillen, J.; Pauli, M.L.; Labastida, R.; Valle, J.; Kleinschek, M.; Lyons, J.; Zarrin, A.A. Treg specialization and functions beyond immune suppression. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2023, 211, 176–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  40. Jugder, B.-E.; Park, E.; Du, L.; Jawale, C.; Popov, N.; Guo, Z.; Bednar, K.J.; Ort, T. Tissue-specific roles of regulatory T cells: Mechanisms of suppression and beyond along with emerging therapeutic insights in autoimmune indications. Front. Immunol. 2025, 16, 1650451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  41. Huang, N.; Chi, H.; Qiao, J. Role of Regulatory T Cells in Regulating Fetal-Maternal Immune Tolerance in Healthy Pregnancies and Reproductive Diseases. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  42. Rackaityte, E.; Halkias, J. Mechanisms of Fetal T Cell Tolerance and Immune Regulation. Front. Immunol. 2020, 11, 1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  43. Wang, W.; Zhao, Y.; Zhou, X.; Sung, N.; Chen, L.; Zhang, X.; Ma, D.; Zhu, P.; Kwak-Kim, J. Dynamic changes in regulatory T cells during normal pregnancy, recurrent pregnancy loss, and gestational diabetes. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2022, 150, 103492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  44. Alanazi, H.; Zhang, Y.; Fatunbi, J.; Luu, T.; Kwak-Kim, J. The impact of reproductive hormones on T cell immunity; normal and assisted reproductive cycles. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2024, 165, 104295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  45. Li, Q.H.; Zhao, Q.Y.; Yang, W.J.; Jiang, A.F.; Ren, C.E.; Meng, Y.H. Beyond Immune Balance: The Pivotal Role of Decidual Regulatory T Cells in Unexplained Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion. J. Inflamm. Res. 2024, 17, 2697–2710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  46. Zenclussen, A.C. Regulatory T cells in pregnancy. Springer Semin. Immunopathol. 2006, 28, 31–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  47. Jørgensen, N.; Persson, G.; Hviid, T.V.F. The Tolerogenic Function of Regulatory T Cells in Pregnancy and Cancer. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 911. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  48. Pan, Y.; Zhou, H.; Sun, Z.; Zhu, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Han, J.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Q. Regulatory T cells in solid tumor immunotherapy: Effect, mechanism and clinical application. Cell Death Dis. 2025, 16, 277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  49. Schmidt, A.; Oberle, N.; Krammer, P.H. Molecular mechanisms of treg-mediated T cell suppression. Front. Immunol. 2012, 3, 51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  50. Wang, S.; Li, M.; Sun, F.; Chen, C.; Ye, J.; Li, D.; Qian, J.; Du, M. Th17/Treg-cell balance in the peripheral blood of pregnant females with a history of recurrent spontaneous abortion receiving progesterone or cyclosporine A. Exp. Ther. Med. 2021, 21, 37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  51. Figueiredo, A.S.; Schumacher, A. The T helper type 17/regulatory T cell paradigm in pregnancy. Immunology 2016, 148, 13–21, Erratum in Immunology 2019, 156, 213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  52. Li, Z.; Si, P.; Meng, T.; Zhao, X.; Zhu, C.; Zhang, D.; Meng, S.; Li, N.; Liu, R.; Ni, T.; et al. CCR8+ decidual regulatory T cells maintain maternal-fetal immune tolerance during early pregnancy. Sci. Immunol. 2025, 10, eado2463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  53. Koucky, M.; Lastuvka, Z.; Koprivova, H.; Cindrova-Davies, T.; Hrdy, J.; Cerna, K.; Calda, P. Reduced number of regulatory T cells in maternal circulation precede idiopathic spontaneous preterm labor in a subset of patients. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2025, 232, 222.e1–222.e11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  54. Guan, D.; Sun, W.; Gao, M.; Chen, Z.; Ma, X. Immunologic insights in recurrent spontaneous abortion: Molecular mechanisms and therapeutic interventions. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2024, 177, 117082. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  55. Miller, D.; Motomura, K.; Galaz, J.; Gershater, M.; Lee, E.D.; Romero, R.; Gomez-Lopez, N. Cellular immune responses in the pathophysiology of preeclampsia. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2022, 111, 237–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  56. Robertson, S.A.; Green, E.S.; Care, A.S.; Moldenhauer, L.M.; Prins, J.R.; Hull, M.L.; Barry, S.C.; Dekker, G. Therapeutic Potential of Regulatory T Cells in Preeclampsia-Opportunities and Challenges. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  57. Toldi, G.; Svec, P.; Vásárhelyi, B.; Mészáros, G.; Rigó, J.; Tulassay, T.; Treszl, A. Decreased number of FoxP3+ regulatory T cells in preeclampsia. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 2008, 87, 1229–1233. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  58. Eghbal-Fard, S.; Yousefi, M.; Heydarlou, H.; Ahmadi, M.; Taghavi, S.; Movasaghpour, A.; Jadidi-Niaragh, F.; Yousefi, B.; Dolati, S.; Hojjat-Farsangi, M.; et al. The imbalance of Th17/Treg axis involved in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019, 234, 5106–5116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  59. Hosking, S.L.; Moldenhauer, L.M.; Tran, H.M.; Chan, H.Y.; Groome, H.M.; Lovell, E.A.K.; Green, E.S.; O’Hara, S.E.; Roberts, C.T.; Foyle, K.L.; et al. Treg cells promote decidual vascular remodeling and modulate uterine NK cells in pregnant mice. JCI Insight 2025, 10, e169836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  60. Christensen, A.P.; Bert, S.; Nadkarni, S. Immune Mechanisms of Vascular Disease in Preeclampsia. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 2025, 45, 1715–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  61. Cornelius, D.C.; Amaral, L.M.; Harmon, A.; Wallace, K.; Thomas, A.J.; Campbell, N.; Scott, J.; Herse, F.; Haase, N.; Moseley, J.; et al. An increased population of regulatory T cells improves the pathophysiology of placental ischemia in a rat model of preeclampsia. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2015, 309, R884-891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  62. Motomura, K.; Miller, D.; Galaz, J.; Liu, T.N.; Romero, R.; Gomez-Lopez, N. The effects of progesterone on immune cellular function at the maternal-fetal interface and in maternal circulation. J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol. 2023, 229, 106254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  63. Ohkura, N.; Hamaguchi, M.; Morikawa, H.; Sugimura, K.; Tanaka, A.; Ito, Y.; Osaki, M.; Tanaka, Y.; Yamashita, R.; Nakano, N.; et al. T cell receptor stimulation-induced epigenetic changes and Foxp3 expression are independent and complementary events required for Treg cell development. Immunity 2012, 37, 785–799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  64. Riaz, F.; Huang, Z.; Pan, F. Targeting post-translational modifications of Foxp3: A new paradigm for regulatory T cell-specific therapy. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1280741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  65. Li, J.; Wang, F.P.; She, W.M.; Yang, C.Q.; Li, L.; Tu, C.T.; Wang, J.Y.; Jiang, W. Enhanced high-mobility group box 1 (HMGB1) modulates regulatory T cells (Treg)/T helper 17 (Th17) balance via toll-like receptor (TLR)-4-interleukin (IL)-6 pathway in patients with chronic hepatitis B. J. Viral Hepat. 2014, 21, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  66. Tesmer, L.A.; Lundy, S.K.; Sarkar, S.; Fox, D.A. Th17 cells in human disease. Immunol. Rev. 2008, 223, 87–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  67. Shields, C.A.; McCalmon, M.; Ibrahim, T.; White, D.L.; Williams, J.M.; LaMarca, B.; Cornelius, D.C. Placental ischemia-stimulated T-helper 17 cells induce preeclampsia-associated cytolytic natural killer cells during pregnancy. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2018, 315, R336–R343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  68. Osborne, L.M.; Brar, A.; Klein, S.L. The role of Th17 cells in the pathophysiology of pregnancy and perinatal mood and anxiety disorders. Brain Behav. Immun. 2019, 76, 7–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  69. Beurel, E.; Harrington, L.E.; Jope, R.S. Inflammatory T helper 17 cells promote depression-like behavior in mice. Biol. Psychiatry 2013, 73, 622–630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  70. Fu, B.; Tian, Z.; Wei, H. TH17 cells in human recurrent pregnancy loss and pre-eclampsia. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2014, 11, 564–570. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  71. Murphy, T.M.; O’Donovan, A.; Mullins, N.; O’Farrelly, C.; McCann, A.; Malone, K. Anxiety is associated with higher levels of global DNA methylation and altered expression of epigenetic and interleukin-6 genes. Psychiatr. Genet. 2015, 25, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  72. Fu, B.; Li, X.; Sun, R.; Tong, X.; Ling, B.; Tian, Z.; Wei, H. Natural killer cells promote immune tolerance by regulating inflammatory TH17 cells at the human maternal-fetal interface. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, E231-240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  73. Mor, G.; Cardenas, I.; Abrahams, V.; Guller, S. Inflammation and pregnancy: The role of the immune system at the implantation site. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2011, 1221, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  74. Wu, H.X.; Jin, L.P.; Xu, B.; Liang, S.S.; Li, D.J. Decidual stromal cells recruit Th17 cells into decidua to promote proliferation and invasion of human trophoblast cells by secreting IL-17. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2014, 11, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  75. Nakashima, A.; Ito, M.; Yoneda, S.; Shiozaki, A.; Hidaka, T.; Saito, S. Circulating and decidual Th17 cell levels in healthy pregnancy. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2010, 63, 104–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  76. Pongcharoen, S.; Somran, J.; Sritippayawan, S.; Niumsup, P.; Chanchan, P.; Butkhamchot, P.; Tatiwat, P.; Kunngurn, S.; Searle, R.F. Interleukin-17 expression in the human placenta. Placenta 2007, 28, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  77. Morcillo-Martín-Romo, P.; Valverde-Pozo, J.; Ortiz-Bueno, M.; Arnone, M.; Espinar-Barranco, L.; Espinar-Barranco, C.; García-Rubiño, M.E. The Role of NK Cells in Cancer Immunotherapy: Mechanisms, Evasion Strategies, and Therapeutic Advances. Biomedicines 2025, 13, 857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  78. Zhang, X.; Wei, H. Role of Decidual Natural Killer Cells in Human Pregnancy and Related Pregnancy Complications. Front. Immunol. 2021, 12, 728291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  79. Toldi, G.; Rigó, J., Jr.; Stenczer, B.; Vásárhelyi, B.; Molvarec, A. Increased prevalence of IL-17-producing peripheral blood lymphocytes in pre-eclampsia. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2011, 66, 223–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  80. Darmochwal-Kolarz, D.; Kludka-Sternik, M.; Tabarkiewicz, J.; Kolarz, B.; Rolinski, J.; Leszczynska-Gorzelak, B.; Oleszczuk, J. The predominance of Th17 lymphocytes and decreased number and function of Treg cells in preeclampsia. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2012, 93, 75–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  81. Cunningham, M.W.; Jayaram, A.; Deer, E.; Amaral, L.M.; Vaka, V.R.; Ibrahim, T.; Cornelius, D.C.; LaMarca, B. Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) blockade improves natural killer cell (NK) activation, hypertension, and mitochondrial oxidative stress in a preclinical rat model of preeclampsia. Hypertens. Pregnancy 2020, 39, 399–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  82. LeBien, T.W.; Tedder, T.F. B lymphocytes: How they develop and function. Blood J. Am. Soc. Hematol. 2008, 112, 1570–1580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  83. Cyster, J.G.; Allen, C.D. B cell responses: Cell interaction dynamics and decisions. Cell 2019, 177, 524–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  84. Hoffman, W.; Lakkis, F.G.; Chalasani, G. B cells, antibodies, and more. Clin. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2016, 11, 137–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  85. Griffin, D.O.; Holodick, N.E.; Rothstein, T.L. Human B1 cells in umbilical cord and adult peripheral blood express the novel phenotype CD20+ CD27+ CD43+ CD70. J. Exp. Med. 2011, 208, 67–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  86. Muzzio, D.; Zenclussen, A.C.; Jensen, F. The role of B cells in pregnancy: The good and the bad. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2013, 69, 408–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  87. Martin, F.; Kearney, J.F. Marginal-zone B cells. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2002, 2, 323–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  88. Monroe, J.G.; Dorshkind, K. Fate decisions regulating bone marrow and peripheral B lymphocyte development. Adv. Immunol. 2007, 95, 1–50. [Google Scholar]
  89. Lorek, D.; Kedzierska, A.E.; Slawek, A.; Chelmonska-Soyta, A. Expression of Toll-like receptors and costimulatory molecules in splenic B cells in a normal and abortion-prone murine pregnancy model. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2019, 82, e13148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  90. Wang, L.; Jiang, P.; Zhao, S.; Liu, H.; Liu, L.; Mor, G.; Liu, C.; Liao, A. The dynamic profile and potential function of B-cell subsets during pregnancy. Cell. Mol. Immunol. 2021, 18, 1082–1084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  91. Tongio, M.; Berrebi, A.; Mayer, S. A study of lymphocytotoxic antibodies in multiparous women having had at least four pregnancies. Tissue Antigens 1972, 2, 378–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  92. Vives, J.; Gelabert, A.; Castillo, R. HLA antibodies and period of gestation: Decline in frequency of positive sera during last trimester. Tissue Antigens 1976, 7, 209–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  93. Canellada, A.; Färber, A.; Zenclussen, A.; Gentile, T.; Dokmetjian, J.; Keil, A.; Blois, S.; Miranda, S.; Berod, L.; Gutierrez, G. Interleukin regulation of asymmetric antibody synthesized by isolated placental B cells. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2002, 48, 275–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  94. Zenclussen, A.C.; Gentile, T.; Margni, R.; Kortebani, G.; Mazzolli, A. Asymmetric antibodies and pregnancy. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2001, 45, 289–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  95. Yang, X.; Zhang, C.; Chen, G.; Sun, C.; Li, J. Antibodies: The major participants in maternal–fetal interaction. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res. 2019, 45, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  96. Zeng, B.; Kwak-Kim, J.; Liu, Y.; Liao, A.H. Treg Cells Are Negatively Correlated with Increased Memory B Cells in Pre-eclampsia While Maintaining Suppressive Function on Autologous B-Cell Proliferation. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2013, 70, 454–463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  97. Ota, K.; Dambaeva, S.; Lee, J.; Gilman-Sachs, A.; Beaman, K.; Kwak-Kim, J. Persistent high levels of IgM antiphospholipid antibodies in a patient with recurrent pregnancy losses and rheumatoid arthritis. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2014, 71, 286–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  98. Carbone, J.; Sarmiento, E.; Gallego, A.; Lanio, N.; Navarro, J.; García, S.; Fernandez-Cruz, E. Peripheral blood T-and B-cell immunophenotypic abnormalities in selected women with unexplained recurrent miscarriage. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2016, 113, 50–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  99. Dutta, S.; Sengupta, P.; Haque, N. Reproductive immunomodulatory functions of B cells in pregnancy: B cells are critical players in pregnancy that fine-tune immune tolerance and response, by crosstalks with gestational hormones. Int. Rev. Immunol. 2020, 39, 53–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  100. Wu, H.; Su, Z.; Barnie, P.A. The role of B regulatory (B10) cells in inflammatory disorders and their potential as therapeutic targets. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2020, 78, 106111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  101. Carter, N.A.; Vasconcellos, R.; Rosser, E.C.; Tulone, C.; Muñoz-Suano, A.; Kamanaka, M.; Ehrenstein, M.R.; Flavell, R.A.; Mauri, C. Mice lacking endogenous IL-10–producing regulatory B cells develop exacerbated disease and present with an increased frequency of Th1/Th17 but a decrease in regulatory T cells. J. Immunol. 2011, 186, 5569–5579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  102. Liu, J.; Chen, X.; Hao, S.; Zhao, H.; Pang, L.; Wang, L.; Ren, H.; Wang, C.; Mao, H. Human chorionic gonadotropin and IL-35 contribute to the maintenance of peripheral immune tolerance during pregnancy through mediating the generation of IL-10+ or IL-35+ Breg cells. Exp. Cell Res. 2019, 383, 111513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  103. LaMarca, B.; Wallace, K.; Granger, J. Role of angiotensin II type I receptor agonistic autoantibodies (AT1-AA) in preeclampsia. Curr. Opin. Pharmacol. 2011, 11, 175–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  104. LaMarca, B.; Wallace, K.; Herse, F.; Wallukat, G.; Martin, J.N., Jr.; Weimer, A.; Dechend, R. Hypertension in response to placental ischemia during pregnancy: Role of B lymphocytes. Hypertension 2011, 57, 865–871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  105. Cornelius, D.C.; Castillo, J.; Porter, J.; Amaral, L.M.; Campbell, N.; Paige, A.; Thomas, A.J.; Harmon, A.; Cunningham, M.W., Jr.; Wallace, K. Blockade of CD40 ligand for intercellular communication reduces hypertension, placental oxidative stress, and AT1-AA in response to adoptive transfer of CD4+ T lymphocytes from RUPP rats. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2015, 309, R1243–R1250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  106. Herrock, O.T.; Deer, E.; Amaral, L.M.; Campbell, N.; Lemon, J.; Ingram, N.; Cornelius, D.C.; Turner, T.; Fitzgerald, S.; Ibrahim, T. B2 cells Contribute to the Pathophysiology of Hypertension in Response to Placental Ischemia. Am. J. Physiol.-Ren. Physiol. 2022, 324, F179–F192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  107. Schneider, P. The role of APRIL and BAFF in lymphocyte activation. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2005, 17, 282–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  108. Herrock, O.; Deer, E.; Amaral, L.M.; Campbell, N.; Whitney, D.; Ingram, N.; Cornelius, D.C.; Turner, T.; Hardy-Hardin, J.N.; Booz, G.W. Inhibiting B cell activating factor attenuates preeclamptic symptoms in placental ischemic rats. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2023, 89, e13693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  109. Thomas Herrock, O.; Campbell, N.; Deer, E.; Amaral, L.M.; Whitney, D.; Morris, R.; Wallace, K.; Warren Turner, T.; Cleveland, E.H.; Belk, S. Preeclamptic placental CD19+ B cells are causal to hypertension during pregnancy. Hypertension 2025, 82, 894–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  110. Salby, S.B.; Persson, G.; Pedersen, N.H.; Turan, G.; Kimmerslev, L.; Finne, K.F.; Weisdorf, I.; Lebech, M.; Hviid, T.V.F. Reduced expression of programmed cell death protein 1 on peripheral regulatory B cells in pre-eclampsia–Signs of impaired immune suppression. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2025, 168, 104426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  111. Wang, S.; Liu, Y.; Liang, Y.; Sun, L.; Du, X.; Shi, Y.; Meng, J. Excessive Immune Activation and the Correlation with Decreased Expression of PD-1 at the Maternal–Fetal Interface in Preeclampsia. Reprod. Sci. 2023, 30, 192–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  112. Meggyes, M.; Miko, E.; Szigeti, B.; Farkas, N.; Szereday, L. The importance of the PD-1/PD-L1 pathway at the maternal-fetal interface. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2019, 19, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  113. Solise, D.; Campbell, N.; Ashraf, U.; Herrock, O.; Crudup, B.; Mallette, J.; Willis, A.; Rawls, A.Z.; Turner, T.; Cockrell, K. Inhibition of angiotensin II type 1 receptor agonistic autoantibodies by direct binding does not impact reduced uterine perfusion pressure offspring birthweight and blood pressure at adulthood. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. MFM 2023, 5, 100945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  114. Campbell, N.; Deer, E.; Solise, D.; Cornelius, D.C.; Turner, T.; Amaral, L.M.; Herrock, O.; Jordan, A.; Shukla, S.; Ibrahim, T. AT1-AA Is Produced in Offspring in Response to Placental Ischemia and Is Lowered by B-Cell Depletion Without Compromising Overall Offspring Health. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2024, 13, e031417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  115. Hubel, C.A.; Wallukat, G.; Wolf, M.; Herse, F.; Rajakumar, A.; Roberts, J.M.; Markovic, N.; Thadhani, R.; Luft, F.C.; Dechend, R. Agonistic angiotensin II type 1 receptor autoantibodies in postpartum women with a history of preeclampsia. Hypertension 2007, 49, 612–617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  116. Rieber-Mohn, A.B.; Sugulle, M.; Wallukat, G.; Alnæs-Katjavivi, P.; Størvold, G.L.; Bolstad, N.; Redman, C.W.; Dechend, R.; Staff, A.C. Auto-antibodies against the angiotensin II type I receptor in women with uteroplacental acute atherosis and preeclampsia at delivery and several years postpartum. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2018, 128, 23–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  117. Guilliams, M.; Mildner, A.; Yona, S. Developmental and Functional Heterogeneity of Monocytes. Immunity 2018, 49, 595–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  118. Lendeckel, U.; Venz, S.; Wolke, C. Macrophages: Shapes and functions. ChemTexts 2022, 8, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  119. Davies, L.C.; Jenkins, S.J.; Allen, J.E.; Taylor, P.R. Tissue-resident macrophages. Nat. Immunol. 2013, 14, 986–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  120. Gordon, S.; Plüddemann, A. Tissue macrophages: Heterogeneity and functions. BMC Biol. 2017, 15, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  121. Canton, J. Phagosome maturation in polarized macrophages. J. Leukoc. Biol. 2014, 96, 729–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  122. Yao, Y.; Xu, X.-H.; Jin, L. Macrophage Polarization in Physiological and Pathological Pregnancy. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  123. Sica, A.; Mantovani, A. Macrophage plasticity and polarization: In vivo veritas. J. Clin. Investig. 2012, 122, 787–795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  124. Mantovani, A.; Sica, A.; Sozzani, S.; Allavena, P.; Vecchi, A.; Locati, M. The chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization. Trends Immunol. 2004, 25, 677–686. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  125. Porta, C.; Riboldi, E.; Ippolito, A.; Sica, A. Molecular and epigenetic basis of macrophage polarized activation. Semin. Immunol. 2015, 27, 237–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  126. Weisser, S.B.; McLarren, K.W.; Kuroda, E.; Sly, L.M. Generation and characterization of murine alternatively activated macrophages. In Basic Cell Culture Protocols; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2012; pp. 225–239. [Google Scholar]
  127. True, H.; Blanton, M.; Sureshchandra, S.; Messaoudi, I. Monocytes and macrophages in pregnancy: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Immunol. Rev. 2022, 308, 77–92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  128. Jena, M.K.; Nayak, N.; Chen, K.; Nayak, N.R. Role of macrophages in pregnancy and related complications. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. 2019, 67, 295–309. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  129. Lash, G.E.; Pitman, H.; Morgan, H.L.; Innes, B.A.; Agwu, C.N.; Bulmer, J.N. Decidual macrophages: Key regulators of vascular remodeling in human pregnancy. J. Leucoc. Biol. 2016, 100, 315–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  130. Tang, Z.; Niven-Fairchild, T.; Tadesse, S.; Norwitz, E.R.; Buhimschi, C.S.; Buhimschi, I.A.; Guller, S. Glucocorticoids enhance CD163 expression in placental Hofbauer cells. Endocrinology 2013, 154, 471–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  131. Ingman, K.; Cookson, V.; Jones, C.; Aplin, J. Characterisation of Hofbauer cells in first and second trimester placenta: Incidence, phenotype, survival in vitro and motility. Placenta 2010, 31, 535–544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  132. Loegl, J.; Hiden, U.; Nussbaumer, E.; Schliefsteiner, C.; Cvitic, S.; Lang, I.; Wadsack, C.; Huppertz, B.; Desoye, G. Hofbauer cells of M2a, M2b and M2c polarization may regulate feto-placental angiogenesis. Reproduction 2016, 152, 447–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  133. Takahashi, K.; Naito, M.; Katabuchi, H.; Higashi, K. Development, differentiation, and maturation of macrophages in the chorionic villi of mouse placenta with special reference to the origin of Hofbauer cells. J. Leukoc. Biol. 1991, 50, 57–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  134. Vishnyakova, P.; Elchaninov, A.; Fatkhudinov, T.; Sukhikh, G. Role of the Monocyte–Macrophage System in Normal Pregnancy and Preeclampsia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019, 20, 3695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  135. Faas, M.M.; Spaans, F.; De Vos, P. Monocytes and macrophages in pregnancy and pre-eclampsia. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5, 298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  136. Liu, J.; Geng, X.; Hou, J.; Wu, G. New insights into M1/M2 macrophages: Key modulators in cancer progression. Cancer Cell Int. 2021, 21, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  137. Harmon, A.; Cornelius, D.; Amaral, L.; Paige, A.; Herse, F.; Ibrahim, T.; Wallukat, G.; Faulkner, J.; Moseley, J.; Dechend, R.; et al. IL-10 supplementation increases Tregs and decreases hypertension in the RUPP rat model of preeclampsia. Hypertens. Pregnancy 2015, 34, 291–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  138. Raymond, D.; Peterson, E. A critical review of early-onset and late-onset preeclampsia. Obstet. Gynecol. Surv. 2011, 66, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  139. Amaral, L.M.; Wallace, K.; Owens, M.; LaMarca, B. Pathophysiology and current clinical management of preeclampsia. Curr. Hypertens. Rep. 2017, 19, 61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  140. Lei, J.; Vermillion, M.; Jia, B.; Xie, H.; Xie, L.; McLane, M.; Sheffield, J.; Pekosz, A.; Brown, A.; Klein, S.; et al. IL-1 receptor antagonist therapy mitigates placental dysfunction and perinatal injury following Zika virus infection. JCI Insight 2019, 4, e122678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  141. Nadeau-Vallée, M.; Chin, P.; Belarbi, L.; Brien, M.-E.; Pundir, S.; Berryer, M.; Beaudry-Richard, A.; Madaan, A.; Sharkey, D.; Lupien-Meilleur, A.; et al. Antenatal Suppression of IL-1 Protects against Inflammation-Induced Fetal Injury and Improves Neonatal and Developmental Outcomes in Mice. J. Immunol. 2017, 198, 2047–2062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  142. Phipps, E.A.; Thadhani, R.; Benzing, T.; Karumanchi, S.A. Pre-eclampsia: Pathogenesis, novel diagnostics and therapies. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2019, 15, 275–289, Correction in Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2019, 15, 386–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  143. Jabrane-Ferrat, N. Features of human decidual NK cells in healthy pregnancy and during viral infection. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  144. Saito, S.; Morii, T.; Enomoto, M.; Sakakura, S.; Nishikawa, K.; Narita, N.; Ichijo, M. The Effect of Interleukin 2 and Transforming Growth Factor-β2 (TGF-β2) on the Proliferation and Natural Killer Activity of Decidual CD16 CD56bright Natural Killer Cells. Cell. Immunol. 1993, 152, 605–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  145. Goodridge, J.P.; Jacobs, B.; Saetersmoen, M.L.; Clement, D.; Hammer, Q.; Clancy, T.; Skarpen, E.; Brech, A.; Landskron, J.; Grimm, C.; et al. Remodeling of secretory lysosomes during education tunes functional potential in NK cells. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  146. Chen, X.; Man, G.C.W.; Liu, Y.; Wu, F.; Huang, J.; Li, T.C.; Wang, C.C. Physiological and pathological angiogenesis in endometrium at the time of embryo implantation. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2017, 78, e12693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  147. Manaster, I.; Mandelboim, O. The unique properties of human NK cells in the uterine mucosa. Placenta 2008, 29, S60–S66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  148. Yang, F.; Zheng, Q.; Jin, L. Dynamic Function and Composition Changes of Immune Cells During Normal and Pathological Pregnancy at the Maternal-Fetal Interface. Front. Immunol. 2019, 10, 2317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  149. Wei, X.; Yang, X. The central role of natural killer cells in preeclampsia. Front. Immunol. 2023, 14, 1009867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  150. Cartwright, J.E.; James-Allan, L.; Buckley, R.J.; Wallace, A.E. The role of decidual NK cells in pregnancies with impaired vascular remodelling. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2017, 119, 81–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  151. Wang, Y.; Xu, B.; Li, M.Q.; Li, D.J.; Jin, L.P. IL-22 secreted by decidual stromal cells and NK cells promotes the survival of human trophoblasts. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2013, 6, 1781–1790. [Google Scholar]
  152. Ma, L.; Li, G.; Cao, G.; Zhu, Y.; Du, M.R.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, H.; Liu, Y.; Yang, Y.; Li, Y.X.; et al. dNK cells facilitate the interaction between trophoblastic and endothelial cells via VEGF-C and HGF. Immunol. Cell Biol. 2017, 95, 695–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  153. Du, M.; Wang, W.; Huang, L.; Guan, X.; Lin, W.; Yao, J.; Li, L. Natural killer cells in the pathogenesis of preeclampsia: A double-edged sword. J. Matern. Fetal Neonatal Med. 2022, 35, 1028–1035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  154. Bachmayer, N.; Rafik Hamad, R.; Liszka, L.; Bremme, K.; Sverremark-Ekström, E. Aberrant uterine natural killer (NK)-cell expression and altered placental and serum levels of the NK-cell promoting cytokine interleukin-12 in pre-eclampsia. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol. 2006, 56, 292–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  155. Williams, P.J.; Bulmer, J.N.; Searle, R.F.; Innes, B.A.; Robson, S.C. Altered decidual leucocyte populations in the placental bed in pre-eclampsia and foetal growth restriction: A comparison with late normal pregnancy. Reproduction 2009, 138, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  156. Milosevic-Stevanovic, J.; Krstic, M.; Radovic-Janosevic, D.; Popovic, J.; Tasic, M.; Stojnev, S. Number of decidual natural killer cells & macrophages in pre-eclampsia. Indian J. Med. Res. 2016, 144, 823–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  157. Lockwood, C.J.; Huang, S.J.; Chen, C.P.; Huang, Y.; Xu, J.; Faramarzi, S.; Kayisli, O.; Kayisli, U.; Koopman, L.; Smedts, D.; et al. Decidual cell regulation of natural killer cell-recruiting chemokines: Implications for the pathogenesis and prediction of preeclampsia. Am. J. Pathol. 2013, 183, 841–856, Correction in Am. J. Pathol. 2013, 183, 1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  158. Al Omar, S.; Flanagan, B.F.; Almehmadi, M.; Christmas, S.E. The effects of IL-17 upon human natural killer cells. Cytokine 2013, 62, 123–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  159. Pazmany, L.; Mandelboim, O.; Vales-Gomez, M.; Davis, D.M.; Becker, T.C.; Reyburn, H.T.; Seebach, J.D.; Hill, J.A.; Strominger, J.L. Human leucocyte antigen-G and its recognition by natural killer cells. J. Reprod. Immunol. 1999, 43, 127–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  160. Apps, R.; Murphy, S.P.; Fernando, R.; Gardner, L.; Ahad, T.; Moffett, A. Human leucocyte antigen (HLA) expression of primary trophoblast cells and placental cell lines, determined using single antigen beads to characterize allotype specificities of anti-HLA antibodies. Immunology 2009, 127, 26–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  161. Tilburgs, T.; Crespo, Â.C.; van der Zwan, A.; Rybalov, B.; Raj, T.; Stranger, B.; Gardner, L.; Moffett, A.; Strominger, J.L. Human HLA-G+ extravillous trophoblasts: Immune-activating cells that interact with decidual leukocytes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 7219–7224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  162. Von Dadelszen, P.; Magee, L.A.; Roberts, J.M. Subclassification of preeclampsia. Hypertens. Pregnancy 2003, 22, 143–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  163. Nevalainen, J.; Skarp, S.; Savolainen, E.-R.; Ryynänen, M.; Järvenpää, J. Intrauterine growth restriction and placental gene expression in severe preeclampsia, comparing early-onset and late-onset forms. J. Perinat. Med. 2017, 45, 869–877. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  164. van Rijn, B.B.; Franx, A.; Steegers, E.A.; de Groot, C.J.; Bertina, R.M.; Pasterkamp, G.; Voorbij, H.A.; Bruinse, H.W.; Roest, M. Maternal TLR4 and NOD2 gene variants, pro-inflammatory phenotype and susceptibility to early-onset preeclampsia and HELLP syndrome. PLoS ONE 2008, 3, e1865. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  165. Rolnik, D.L.; Wright, D.; Poon, L.C.; O’Gorman, N.; Syngelaki, A.; de Paco Matallana, C.; Akolekar, R.; Cicero, S.; Janga, D.; Singh, M. Aspirin versus placebo in pregnancies at high risk for preterm preeclampsia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2017, 377, 613–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit]
  166. Cunningham, M.W., Jr.; Castillo, J.; Ibrahim, T.; Cornelius, D.C.; Campbell, N.; Amaral, L.; Vaka, V.R.; Usry, N.; Williams, J.M.; LaMarca, B. AT1-AA (angiotensin II type 1 receptor agonistic autoantibody) blockade prevents preeclamptic symptoms in placental ischemic rats. Hypertension 2018, 71, 886–893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
  167. Cottrell, J.N.; Witcher, A.C.; Comley, K.; Cunningham, M.W., Jr.; Ibrahim, T.; Cornelius, D.C.; LaMarca, B.; Amaral, L.M. Progesterone-induced blocking factor improves blood pressure, inflammation, and pup weight in response to reduced uterine perfusion pressure (RUPP). Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 2021, 320, R719–R727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Scilit] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The imbalance between regulatory T cells (Tregs) and T helper-17 cells (Th17s) contributes to the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. In preeclampsia, Treg cells are reduced, and Th17 cells are increased, resulting in an elevated Th17:Treg ratio. This amplifies neutrophilic responses and shifts the immune environment to a pro-inflammatory state. As a result, there is increased inflammation, reactive oxygen species, fetal growth restriction, and hypertension.
Figure 1. The imbalance between regulatory T cells (Tregs) and T helper-17 cells (Th17s) contributes to the pathogenesis of preeclampsia. In preeclampsia, Treg cells are reduced, and Th17 cells are increased, resulting in an elevated Th17:Treg ratio. This amplifies neutrophilic responses and shifts the immune environment to a pro-inflammatory state. As a result, there is increased inflammation, reactive oxygen species, fetal growth restriction, and hypertension.
Ijms 27 00074 g001
Figure 2. B Cells in normal pregnancy contribute to immune regulation through production of asymmetric antibodies and regulatory cytokines. In Preeclampsia B cells produce AT1-AAs contributing to the disease.
Figure 2. B Cells in normal pregnancy contribute to immune regulation through production of asymmetric antibodies and regulatory cytokines. In Preeclampsia B cells produce AT1-AAs contributing to the disease.
Ijms 27 00074 g002
Figure 3. Macrophages are highly plastic innate immune cells with the ability to polarize their phenotype in response to the local microenvironment. M1 macrophages are classically activated macrophages induced by IFN-γ and LPS. They are characterized by surface markers such as iNOS, TLR2, CD68, and CD80, and they secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6. M2 macrophages, in contrast, are alternatively activated and are induced by IL-4, IL-13, or IL-10. They are defined by surface markers such as CD163, CD206, Fizz1, and Ym1/2, and they secrete anti-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-10 and TGF-β.
Figure 3. Macrophages are highly plastic innate immune cells with the ability to polarize their phenotype in response to the local microenvironment. M1 macrophages are classically activated macrophages induced by IFN-γ and LPS. They are characterized by surface markers such as iNOS, TLR2, CD68, and CD80, and they secrete pro-inflammatory cytokines including TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6. M2 macrophages, in contrast, are alternatively activated and are induced by IL-4, IL-13, or IL-10. They are defined by surface markers such as CD163, CD206, Fizz1, and Ym1/2, and they secrete anti-inflammatory cytokines, including IL-10 and TGF-β.
Ijms 27 00074 g003
Figure 4. Decidual natural killer (dNK) cells secrete cytokines and growth factors such as interleukin (IL)-8, interferon (IFN)-γ, angiotensin I, angiotensin II, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), placental growth factor (PlGF), and IFN-γ–induced protein 10 (IP-10). These factors collectively promote spiral artery remodeling and fetal growth. In addition, dNK cells express receptors such as killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs) and natural killer group 2A (NKG2A) receptors, which interact with trophoblast cells to regulate trophoblast invasion.
Figure 4. Decidual natural killer (dNK) cells secrete cytokines and growth factors such as interleukin (IL)-8, interferon (IFN)-γ, angiotensin I, angiotensin II, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), placental growth factor (PlGF), and IFN-γ–induced protein 10 (IP-10). These factors collectively promote spiral artery remodeling and fetal growth. In addition, dNK cells express receptors such as killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptors (KIRs) and natural killer group 2A (NKG2A) receptors, which interact with trophoblast cells to regulate trophoblast invasion.
Ijms 27 00074 g004
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Campbell, N.; Robbins, M.; Nembaware, H.; Deer, E.; Cornelius, D.; LaMarca, B. Immune Cells in Preeclampsia. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2026, 27, 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27010074

AMA Style

Campbell N, Robbins M, Nembaware H, Deer E, Cornelius D, LaMarca B. Immune Cells in Preeclampsia. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2026; 27(1):74. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27010074

Chicago/Turabian Style

Campbell, Nathan, Marcus Robbins, Hellen Nembaware, Evangeline Deer, Denise Cornelius, and Babbette LaMarca. 2026. "Immune Cells in Preeclampsia" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 27, no. 1: 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27010074

APA Style

Campbell, N., Robbins, M., Nembaware, H., Deer, E., Cornelius, D., & LaMarca, B. (2026). Immune Cells in Preeclampsia. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 27(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27010074

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop