Next Article in Journal
Stress Granules in Infectious Disease: Cellular Principles and Dynamic Roles in Immunity and Organelles
Next Article in Special Issue
Comparative Transcriptomic Analysis and Candidate Gene Identification for Wild Rice (GZW) and Cultivated Rice (R998) Under Low-Temperature Stress
Previous Article in Journal
Integration and Differentiation of Transplanted Human iPSC-Derived Retinal Ganglion Cell Precursors in Murine Retinas
Previous Article in Special Issue
Identifying Calmodulin and Calmodulin-like Protein Members in Canavalia rosea and Exploring Their Potential Roles in Abiotic Stress Tolerance
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide Identification of the GbUBC Gene Family in Sea-Island Cotton (Gossypium barbadense) and the Active Regulation of Drought Resistance in Cotton by GbUBC23

1
Key Laboratory of Ecological Adaptation and Evolution of Extreme Environment in Xinjiang, College of Life Sciences, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
2
College of Agronomy, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(23), 12948; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252312948
Submission received: 11 November 2024 / Revised: 28 November 2024 / Accepted: 28 November 2024 / Published: 2 December 2024

Abstract

:
Cotton is an economically critical crop worldwide, and drought stress strongly affects its growth and development. Ubiquitination modifies protein activity and is crucial in numerous biological processes. Ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes serve as intermediaries in the protein ubiquitination process and play important roles in plant responses to abiotic stress. However, the impact of ubiquitination on the response of cotton to abiotic stress is not fully understood. Bioinformatic methods were employed in this study to analyze the physiochemical characteristics, gene structure, collinearity, expression patterns, and evolutionary relationships of GbUBC gene family members in sea-island cotton. In sea-island cotton, a minimum of 125 GbUBC genes are irregularly distributed across the 26 chromosomes, with multiple instances of gene duplication observed among the members. Phylogenetic analysis categorized the GbUBC gene family into 15 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2) subgroups, one ubiquitin E2 enzyme variant (UEV) subgroup, and one COP10 subgroup. GbUBC gene expression pattern analyses revealed that most GbUBC genes responded differently to cold, heat, NaCl, and polyethylene glycol (PEG) treatments, with certain GbUBC genes exhibiting high expression levels in specific fiber development period and organs. Furthermore, molecular biology methods were employed to elucidate the biological functions of GbUBC23. The GbUBC23 gene was highly expressed in the cotyledons of sea-island cotton and was activated by PEG treatment. GbUBC23 is localized to the nucleus and cytomembrane. The silencing of the GbUBC23 gene under drought conditions led to decreased drought tolerance and survival rates in sea-island cotton. Compared with those in the control plants, the activity of proline and superoxide dismutase and the expression levels of the drought-induced genes GbNCED3, GbRD22, GbRD26 were significantly lower, but the levels of malondialdehyde and hydrogen peroxide were significantly higher. Our findings revealed 125 members of the GbUBC gene family in sea-island cotton, with the GbUBC23 gene critically contributing to the abiotic stress response. These findings indicate that the GbUBC gene family may play a crucial role in the drought stress response in sea-island cotton.

1. Introduction

One of the most common posttranslational modifications to proteins, ubiquitination, is essential for selective protein breakdown in plants [1,2,3]. The ubiquitination process is coordinated by three key enzymes: ubiquitin-activating enzymes (E1s), ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes (E2s), and ubiquitin-ligating enzymes (E3s) [4]. This system labels the target protein with a degradation signal through the ubiquitination process and then degrades this protein in the 26S proteasome. E2s are crucial enzymes in this process, serving as intermediaries for delivering active ubiquitin to E3s or directly to the target protein [5]. The functions of E2s in plants concerning the regulation of responses to biotic and abiotic stressors, hormone signaling, and growth and development have been progressively elucidated [6]. Therefore, an in-depth study of the function and mechanism of E2s is highly important for understanding cell biology and plant physiology.
Members of the E2 family are classified on the basis of their conserved domains and functional properties. E2s typically contain a highly conserved ubiquitin-conjugating (UBC) domain of approximately 150 amino acids containing a catalytic cysteine residue (Cys) that serves asthe active site in ubiquitin transfer. In contrast, ubiquitin E2 enzyme variants (UEVs) lack this Cys and usually act as cofactors of active E2s [1,7,8]. The GbUBC gene family can be classified into UBC and UEV groups on the basis of variations in amino acid sequence and domain structure.
To date, multiple UBC family genes have been identified in Arabidopsis [5], upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) [9], wheat (Triticum aestivum) [10], papaya (Carica papaya) [11], longan (Dimocarpus longan) [12], grape (Vitis vinifera) [13], rice (Oryza sativa) [14], sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) [15], potato (Solanum tuberosum) [16], tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) [17], bananas (Musa acuminata) [18], soybean (Glycine max) [19], maize (Zea mays) [20], and Brassica napus [21]. In addition, some UBC genes have been functionally validated in plants. The UBC genes play crucial roles in Arabidopsis flowering [22], seedling photomorphogenesis [23], root hair development [24,25], and ovule growth [26]. SlUBC32 is a regulatory factor for fruit ripening in tomatoes [27]. GhUBC2L regulates the organ size of upland cotton through histone monoubiquitination [9]. Furthermore, UBC genes are involved in plant responses to various environmental stressors, such as drought, salt, high temperature, and low temperature. UBC13 participates in the response of Arabidopsis to low-temperature stress [28]. UBC15 and its complexes mediate the degradation of the Short Vegetative Phase (SVP) at high temperatures, accelerating Arabidopsis flowering [29]. The mutation of AtUBC32 can increase salt tolerance in Arabidopsis [30]. The silencing of the AtUBC32, AtUBC33, and AtUBC34 genes in Arabidopsis resulted in stomatal closure and increased drought stress tolerance [31]. GmUBC9 overexpression increased drought tolerance in both soybean and Arabidopsis [19]. However, in cotton, there is only one example of the involvement of the UBC gene in abiotic stress. In upland cotton, GhUBC10-2 facilitates the degradation of GhGSTU17 to modulate salt tolerance [32]. Consequently, UBC genes are necessary for the growth and development of plants, as well as their reactions to abiotic stress from the environment.
Cotton is a critical source of fiber for the textile sector. Nevertheless, research on UBC family members and abiotic resistance-related genes in sea-island cotton has been limited. To gain a better understanding of the role that GbUBC genes play in the growth and development of sea-island cotton as well as their reactions to abiotic stress, biological information techniques were employed to identify the GbUBC genes, and the structure and function, physical and chemical properties, chromosome localization, subcellular localization, stress heatmaps, different stages of fiber development and organ heatmaps, and phylogenetic relationships among the family members were systematically analyzed. The function of the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme GbUBC23 was determined. Silencing the GbUBC23 gene in sea-island cotton significantly decreased the drought tolerance phenotype, the survival rate, and the water-loss rate, reduced proline levels and superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity, and elevated malondialdehyde (MDA) and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) levels. This study provides a theoretical framework for examining the molecular processes via which GbUBC genes respond to drought stress in sea-island cotton, identifying a new candidate gene for the development of drought-resistant cultivars of this crop.

2. Results

2.1. Identification of the UBC Gene Family in Sea-Island Cotton

A total of 303 GbUBC protein sequences were examined in this investigation. After manually removing proteins without the UBC domain, deleting short non-full-length fragments, and removing superfluous sequences of identical genes, we obtained 125 matching gene sequences, and these 125 genes were considered the GbUBC genes of sea-island cotton (Table S1). Furthermore, we named the 125 sea-island cotton UBC genes GbUBC1GbUBC125 according to their location in the genome.
The gene name, gene locus, amino acid size, molecular weight (MW), theoretical isoelectric point (PI), aliphatic index, grand average of hydropathicity, and subcellular localization prediction information for all UBC gene families of sea-island cotton are provided in Table S2. The coding region lengths of each of the genes were between 339 bp (GbUBC38) and 3345 bp (GbUBC84), and the MWs of the coding proteins varied from 12.54 kDa (GbUBC38) to 123.4 kDa (GbUBC84). The pIs ranged from 4.21 (GbUBC97) to 9.49 (GbUBC110), and the aliphatic indices ranged from 65.65 (GbUBC71) to 95.1 (GbUBC74). Subcellular localization predictions revealed that 104 GbUBC proteins are located to the nucleus, 8 to the cytoplasm, 1 to the endoplasmic reticulum, 10 to the nucleus and cytoplasm, and 2 to the chloroplasts and nucleus.

2.2. Chromosome Localization and Phylogenetic Analysis of the GbUBC Genes

Sea-island cotton has 125 GbUBC genes dispersed unevenly over the 26 chromosomes (Figure 1), with 72 and 53 genes in the chromosomal A and D groups, respectively. Chromosome A11 has the most UBC genes, with 16; chromosomes A13, D03, and D13 each contain one UBC gene; two UBC genes are located on chromosome D08; chromosomes A02, D02, D04, and D07 each contain three UBC genes; chromosomes A03, A04, A07, A08, A10, D09, and D10 all contain four UBC genes; chromosomes A06 and D06 both possess five UBC genes; chromosomes A05, A09, D01, and D05 all contain six UBC genes; chromosomes A01 and D12 both contain seven UBC genes; and chromosomes A12 and D11 each contain eight UBC genes.
We developed a phylogenetic tree to examine the evolutionary relationships of the GbUBC genes via UBC sequences of proteins from sea-island cotton, upland cotton, and Arabidopsis. The phylogenetic tree (Figure 2) divided the GbUBC gene family into 21 different groups, including typical UBC groups I-XVI and atypical UBC groups such as UEV, UFC, ELC, COP10, and XVII. Among them, the VI group was the largest branch among all groups, with a total of 76 members. In addition, we identified 29 GbUBC gene family members in group VI, accounting for 38.2% of the group’s members. In the entire evolutionary tree, group VI also has the most GbUBC gene members; no GbUBC gene members are present in subfamilies XIII, XVII, UFC, and ELC. Additionally, we found that the UBC genes of three species are present in almost every branch. These findings indicate that the evolutionary history of the GbUBC gene members aligns with those of Arabidopsis and upland cotton. These findings suggest that the UBC genes may have rapidly multiplied before sea-island cotton diverged from upland cotton and Arabidopsis.

2.3. Structural Analysis of the GbUBC Genes

An analysis of conserved motifs was performed on 125 GbUBC protein sequences in sea-island cotton via the MEME online program, resulting in the prediction of 10 motifs (Figure 3A). The distribution and quantity of motifs in the GbUBC proteins indicate that each protein contains between two and seven motifs. All 125 proteins share the common motif 1, and most sequences also contain motifs 2 and 3 (Figure 3A). These findings suggest that these motifs are important for the function and conserved position of the UBC proteins. Moreover, we found that within each group, the majority of GbUBC members had similar motif compositions, while there were significant differences in motif compositions between different groups (Figure 3A). The UBC domain corresponding to the motif is also shown in Figure 3B. The results show that the UBC gene family proteins are categorized into distinct subgroups on the basis of different UBC domains, each serving different functions.
During the evolution of gene families, the introns and exons served distinct functions in gene expression and regulation. The quantity and distribution of introns and exons in the GbUBC gene family in sea-island cotton demonstrate its evolutionary relationship with the genome. A significant correlation was observed among the structures of gene family members throughout the evolutionary process, with clustered members exhibiting similar structural characteristics. The number of exons in the GbUBC gene family in sea-island cotton ranged from 1 to 9, whereas the number of introns ranged from 0 to 10 (Figure 3C). Among them, GbUBC103 does not contain any introns, whereas GbUBC28 and GbUBC105 contain 10 introns; GbUBC29, GbUBC45, GbUBC95, and GbUBC106 contain nine exons, which is the greatest number of exons; and GbUBC42 and GbUBC104 contain only one exon, which is the smallest number (Figure 3C). Most members contained five (26.40%) or six (29.60%) exons (Figure 3C). This finding indicates their conservation during evolution and suggests that these genes may have similar functions.

2.4. Analysis of the Cis-Acting Elements of the GbUBC Genes

Cis-acting elements in the promoter region regulate gene transcription and other biological processes. The 2 kb area upstream of the transcription start site of the GbUBC genes included 41 unique cis-acting elements. The PlantCARE functional annotation categorizes the results into five groups: cis-acting elements linked to the abiotic stress response (ARE, MBS, LTR, etc.), cis-acting elements related to hormonal and chemical responses (ABRE, P-box, CGTCA motif, etc.), cis-acting elements pertaining to circadian rhythms (circular), cis-acting elements associated with the light response (Box4, GT1 motif, G-box, etc.), and cis-acting elements connected to growth (CAT box, GCN4 motif, etc.). The most common cis-acting element (1622) is associated with the light response. Second, 575 cis-acting elements are associated with hormones and chemical reactions, 485 are associated with abiotic stress, 94 are associated with growth, and the fewest (27) are associated with the circadian rhythm. Additionally, various cis-acting elements related to the drought stress response were identified, including MBS (drought induction capability), ABRE (cis-active element associated with the abscisic acid response), TCA (cis-active element linked to the salicylic acid response), TGACG (cis-active regulatory element related to MeJA responsiveness), and TGA (auxin-responsive element) (Figure 4).

2.5. Gene Duplication and Collinearity Analysis of the GbUBC Gene Family

We analyzed tandem and large-scale segmental duplication events in the GbUBC gene family during evolution. The results revealed that 79.2% (99/125) of the GbUBC genes were the result of duplication events, including three pairs of tandemly duplicated genes (GbUBC61/GbUBC62, GbUBC62/GbUBC63, and GbUBC116/GbUBC117). These genes are located on chromosomes A11 and D11, whereas the remaining genes are segmental duplicates (Figure 5). These findings suggest that segmental duplication events may have primarily driven the formation and expansion of the GbUBC gene family. To increase our comprehension of the evolutionary selection pressures on GbUBC genes, we computed the Ka/Ks ratios of the duplicated genes. The findings indicated that among 101 duplicated gene pairs, two pairs (GbUBC19/GbUBC86 and GbUBC42/GbUBC104) presented Ka/Ks ratios exceeding 1, indicating positive selection and that evolution had altered the proteins (Table S3). Two pairs of GbUBC genes with Ka/Ks values of NaN were omitted from the analysis. The fact that the Ka/Ks values for the remaining 97 gene pairs were all lower than one (Table S3) indicates that these genes have been subjected to purifying selection. The genes in the GbUBC gene family in sea-island cotton underwent relatively rapid evolution after chromosome segmental duplication; thus, the GbUBC genes are functionally separated and participate in various physiological activities.

2.6. Expression Analysis of the GbUBC Genes

RNA sequencing data from the cotton expression database were used to examine GbUBC gene expression in sea-island cotton. The analysis included different abiotic stresses (cold treatment, heat treatment, drought stress, and salt stress) and various developmental stages. The results indicated that almost all the GbUBC genes were expressed under different abiotic stresses, except for three genes (GbUBC22, GbUBC50, and GbUBC89), whose expression was not affected by abiotic stress (Figure 6). Members of the same group presented similar expression patterns, such as GbUBC9/GbUBC15/GbUBC35/GbUBC40/GbUBC48/GbUBC70/GbUBC103/GbUBC110/GbUBC124 in subgroup VI and GbUBC14/GbUBC17/GbUBC44/GbUBC81/GbUBC106 in subgroup XI, which presented relatively high expression levels during cold treatment (Figure 6). Similarly, the expression levels of GbUBC4/GbUBC10/GbUBC20/GbUBC65/GbUBC87 in group VII and GbUBC61/GbUBC62/GbUBC63/GbUBC77/GbUBC116/GbUBC117 in the UEV group were relatively high under PEG stress (Figure 6).
The expression levels of the GbUBC gene family were investigated in various organs and at various stages of fiber development. The findings revealed that most GbUBC genes were expressed across different organs, whereas only three genes (GbUBC22, GbUBC37, and GbUBC38) presented no expression in any organ (Figure 7). Furthermore, within each organ, the expression levels of genes belonging to the same groups were found to be similar. For example, genes such as GbUBC6/GbUBC54/GbUBC64/GbUBC113/GbUBC118 in group VI presented high expression levels in the petals, filaments, and anthers (Figure 7). Similarly, during the same period of fiber development, the expression levels of genes belonging to the same group were also similar. For example, the expression levels of genes such as GbUBC19/GbUBC32/GbUBC72/GbUBC86/GbUBC98/GbUBC125 in group V and GbUBC7/GbUBC78/GbUBC80/GbUBC13/GbUBC117/GbUBC61/GbUBC116/GbUBC62 in the UEV group were relatively high in cotton fibers at 10 and 25 days post-anthesis (DPA). The expression levels of the GbUBC71/GbUBC123/GbUBC49/GbUBC111 genes in group IV were greater at −3 DPA in the ovule.
The expression analysis revealed that the GbUBC genes in sea-island cotton are highly expressed under various abiotic stresses. Some genes are strongly expressed under numerous abiotic challenges, suggesting that the GbUBC genes of sea-island cotton may respond to various abiotic stressors. The GbUBC genes in several organs of sea-island cotton do not demonstrate notable expression selectivity. Aside from a limited number of genes that exhibit strong expression in certain organs, the majority of genes are expressed throughout several organs. These results suggest that the GbUBC genes in sea-island cotton may be involved in regulating several phases of cotton growth and development, as well as in reactions to diverse abiotic stimuli.

2.7. GbUBC23 Is Involved in Drought Stress and Is Localized to the Nucleus and Cell Membrane

We studied GbUBC23 in sea-island cotton to further elucidate the possible roles of GbUBC gene family members. GbUBC23 was substantially expressed in sea-island cotton cotyledons (Figure 8A) and was also highly expressed 24 h after PEG stress (Figure 8B). The GbUBC23 gene encodes a 161-amino acid UBC protein, and the members of subgroup VIII in Arabidopsis, sea-island cotton, and upland cotton all have high identity and all contain conserved cysteine residues, which are typical of UBC proteins (Figure 8C). These findings suggest that the sea-island cotton GbUBC23 gene arose from the same ancestry of genes.
We utilized Plant-mPLoc (http://www.csbio.sjtu.edu.cn/bioinf/plant-multi/) (accessed on 26 November 2024) to predict the subcellular localization of GbUBC23, aiming to increase our understanding of its molecular mechanism. The Plant-mPLoc results revealed that GbUBC23 was localized to the nucleus. To further confirm these findings, we injected 35S::GbUBC23-GFP into N. benthamiana to evaluate the subcellular localization of GbUBC23, with 35S::GFP used as a control. Two types of markers were utilized: membrane localization signal-tagged and nuclear localization signal-tagged. GFP was uniformly distributed in N. benthamiana leaf mesophyll cells, whereas 35S::GbUBC23-GFP was confined to the nucleus and cell membrane (Figure 8D). To validate the subcellular localization results in N. benthamiana cells, we employed GFP-tagged protein expression vectors to transform onion epidermal cells. The subcellular localization analysis in onion cells revealed that both GFP and GbUBC23-GFP were localized to the nucleus and cell membrane (Figure 8E), providing further support for the subcellular localization results in N. benthamiana.

2.8. GbUBC23 Gene Silencing Decreases the Tolerance of Sea-Island Cotton to Drought

To understand the drought resistance effect of GbUBC23, we silenced the GbUBC23 gene in sea-island cotton. Following the injection of the positive control gene GbCLA1 into sea-island cotton seedlings, the leaves of the seedlings were bleached after seven days (Supplementary Figure S1), and this state persisted for more than one month. This finding indicates potentially successful gene silencing. Afterward, qPCR was used to measure GbUBC23 gene expression in the control and GbUBC23-silenced plants. Compared with that in the control plants, the expression level of the GbUBC23 gene in the silenced plants was much lower, indicating that the GbUBC23 gene was successfully silenced in cotton (Figure 9A).
Before drought stress, no notable phenotypic abnormalities were observed between the control and silenced plants; however, after drought stress, the severity of wilting in the silenced plants was significantly greater than that in the control plants (Figure 9B). The survival rate of the control plants was 83.3%, whereas the survival rate of the silenced plants was 27%, representing a substantial decrease (Figure 9C). Notably, over a timeframe ranging from five to eight hours, the rate of water loss from the detached leaves of the silenced plants was much greater than that of the control plants (Figure 9D). Under abiotic stress, plants accumulate reactive oxygen species (ROS) in their tissues, accompanied by increases in the levels of H2O2 and MDA. Before drought treatment, the H2O2 and MDA levels in the leaves of the silenced plants were the same as those in the control plants. After drought treatment, the H2O2 and MDA levels were considerably greater in the leaves of the silenced plants than in those of the control plants (Figure 9E,G). As an osmotic regulator, proline maintains the stability of plant cells under drought stress. The leaves of the silenced plants had the same levels of proline as the controls before drought treatment. Compared with those in the control plants, the proline concentrations in the leaves of the silenced plants were markedly lower after drought treatment, indicating that the silencing of GbUBC23 impaired proline synthesis under drought conditions (Figure 9F). Additionally, we assessed the activity of the antioxidant enzyme SOD in both the silenced and control plants. During drought stress, the activity of SOD in the silenced plants was markedly lower than that in the control plants; however, prior to drought stress, no significant difference in SOD activity was noted between the two groups (Figure 9H). Taken together, these results demonstrate that GbUBC23 exerts a beneficial regulatory effect on sea-island cotton under drought stress.

2.9. Changes in Drought Stress-Related Gene Expression

Silencing of the GbUBC23 gene resulted in a reduction in the drought resistance of sea-island cotton. As a result, changes in the expression of genes associated with drought stress were observed to elucidate the molecular mechanism of GbUBC23. The expression levels of the genes GbNCED3, GbRD22, and GbRD26, which are associated with drought stress, were analyzed. Under normal circumstances, the expression levels of GbNCED3, GbRD22, and GbRD26 were not significantly different between the silenced and control plants (Figure 10). Under drought stress conditions, the expression levels of three drought stress-related genes in both the silenced and control plants markedly increased compared with the prestress values. Nonetheless, the expression levels in the silenced plants were markedly lower than those recorded in the control plants (Figure 10). These findings suggest that the repression of the GbUBC23 gene significantly influences cotton drought tolerance.

3. Discussion

Protein ubiquitination is a key process in maintaining cellular homeostasis. E2s are key enzymes involved in protein ubiquitination, providing a binding platform for the ubiquitination of E1s and E3s [33]. Therefore, E2s play crucial roles in normal cellular function. Recently, numerous E2s have been identified in plants, including 48 in rice [34], 75 in maize [20], 53 in Arabidopsis [5,8,35], and 169 in upland cotton [9]. This study identified 125 members of the GbUBC gene family, a greater number than the 53 AtUBC genes but fewer than the 169 GhUBC genes. A total of 347 UBC proteins from Arabidopsis, upland cotton, and sea-island cotton were then grouped into 21 subgroups with tight genetic links via phylogenetic tree analysis [9]. Subcellular localization prediction revealed that most GbUBCs reside in the nucleus, whereas a minority reside in other organelles, suggesting that these proteins regulate microenvironments. According to conserved motif analysis, each member contains at least one UBC-conserved domain with high consistency. An analysis of the gene structure revealed that most members contained 5–6 exons, but there were significant differences in length and structure, indicating that the gene structure of the GbUBC genes is relatively complex. A predictive study of GbUBC gene promoters revealed that most genes have growth-, development-, and abiotic stress-responsive cis-acting elements. The findings of this study indicate that genes belonging to the GbUBC family may be involved in the regulation of growth, development, and response to abiotic stress in sea-island cotton. Gene duplication is an important mechanism in the evolution of gene families. Repeated gene duplication occurs in plants, leading to gene combination or amplification, thereby expanding the gene family. According to previous reports, gene duplication has also occurred in members of the UBC family in wheat [10], rice [14], maize [20], and potato [16]. Through collinearity analysis, we found that 79.2% of the GbUBC genes had undergone duplication events and that 98 pairs of duplicated genes had undergone segmental duplication. The majority of the Ka/Ks values were less than 1, suggesting that the GbUBC genes have been conserved during sea-island cotton genome evolution via segmental duplication, thereby contributing to the expansion of the GbUBC gene family in this species.
Our analysis of GbUBC gene family gene expression levels in sea-island cotton indicates that genes within the same subgroup typically exhibit analogous expression patterns across various tissues, developmental stages, and abiotic stress conditions. Almost all the GbUBC family genes were highly expressed under different abiotic stresses, indicating their potential role in the response of sea-island cotton to these stresses. Studying the spatiotemporal expression pattern of the GbUBC gene provides valuable information for understanding its potential function in sea-island cotton. Previous research has indicated that the expression of numerous UBC genes across various plant species is affected by tissue type, developmental stage, and environmental conditions [9,36,37].
Previous studies revealed a high degree of similarity (71%) between ZmUBC55 and GbUBC23, and ZmUBC55 was upregulated under PEG stress [20]; in addition, GbTCP5 activated the expression of GbUBC23 through the TCP cis-acting element in the promoter region of the GbUBC23 gene, regulating drought tolerance in sea-island cotton [38]. Therefore, the GbUBC23 gene is likely involved in drought stress in sea-island cotton. We subsequently identified GbUBC23, and the expression data revealed that GbUBC23 was highly expressed in cotyledons and highly expressed after 24 h of PEG-simulated drought stress, indicating that GbUBC23 is involved in the regulation of plant responses to abiotic stress. GbUBC23 is highly similar to UBC proteins in the same subfamily of Arabidopsis and upland cotton, and both have a conserved cysteine residue, indicating that GbUBC23 also functions through classical ubiquitination [39]. Subcellular localization can reveal which organelle proteins act on, and many plant UBC proteins localize to multiple organelles [39]. Similarly, GbUBC23 is also localized in the nucleus and cell membrane [19,40].
ROS in plants are essential for sensing biotic and abiotic stress, integrating various environmental signals, and activating stress-response networks [41,42]. An increase in H2O2 content in upland cotton and tomato reduces the drought tolerance of these plants [43,44]. Many plants experience an increase in MDA due to drought stress [45,46]. Under drought stress, plants increase their drought tolerance by reducing their ROS content via increased SOD activity [47,48]. TaERF87 and TaAKS1 work together to control the production of proline mediated by TaP5CS1/TaP5CR1 to promote drought resistance in wheat [49]. In addition, overexpression of the GmUBC9 gene in soybean can increase the proline content and reduce the MDA content, thereby increasing soybean drought resistance [19]. The overexpression of AhUBC2 in Arabidopsis can increase the proline content and increase drought tolerance [50]. In our research, we found that silencing the GbUBC23 gene in sea-island cotton before drought did not result in significant differences in phenotype between the silenced GbUBC23 plants and the control plants. Physiological indicators related to drought stress, such as H2O2 content, MDA content, proline content, and SOD activity, also did not significantly differ. Compared with those of the control plants, the detached leaves of the silenced GbUBC23 plants lost water at a substantially faster rate. However, compared with the control plants, the plants in which GbUBC23 was silenced after drought stress were more prone to wilting, presented increased levels of H2O2 and MDA, and presented reduced concentrations of proline and SOD. These results demonstrate that the silencing of GbUBC23 diminishes drought tolerance in sea-island cotton. One of the drought resistance mechanisms of GbUBC23 involves alleviating the accumulation of ROS under drought stress.
Previous studies identified RD22, RD26, and NCED3 as marker genes for the abiotic stress response in Arabidopsis. The RD22 gene is upregulated in response to drought and abscisic acid [49]. RD26 is an NAC transcription factor that is activated by drought and abscisic acid stimulation [51]. By synthesizing abscisic acid, NCED3 increases drought tolerance in Arabidopsis [52]. Our study revealed the expression levels of the GbRD22, GbRD26, and GbNCED3 genes, which are homologous to those in Arabidopsis in sea-island cotton. Before drought stress, the expression levels in the control plants and those in the silenced plants did not differ significantly. Compared with the control plants, the silenced plants presented significantly lower expression levels of GbRD22, GbRD26, and GbNCED3. These findings indicate that GbUBC23 is involved in the activation of stress-responsive gene expression, ultimately reducing the drought tolerance of transgenic sea-island cotton.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Identification of the GbUBC Gene Family in Sea-Island Cotton

The complete genome of sea-island cotton was downloaded from a database (https://yanglab.hzau.edu.cn/CottonMD.1) (accessed on 5 November 2024). Additionally, Pfam (http://pfam.xfam.org) (accessed on 5 November 2024) was employed to obtain the hidden Markov model (HMM) profile for the UBC domain (PF00179) [53], and the whole-genome protein sequence of sea-island cotton was examined via HMMER 3.0 [54]. The NCBI Conserved Domain Database (NCBI-CDD) (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Structure/bwrpsb/bwrpsb.cgi) (accessed on 5 November 2024), InterPro (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/interpro/) (accessed on 5 November 2024), and SMART (https://smart.embl.de/) (accessed on 5 November 2024) were utilized to verify that the GbUBC proteins possessed structural domain characteristics of E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes [55,56,57]. Genes lacking UBC domains and those that were not full-length were manually eliminated. The average hydropathicity, aliphatic index, pI, and MW of each GbUBC amino acid sequence were concurrently predicted via the web tool ExPASy-PROSITE (http://www.expasy.org/) (accessed on 10 November 2024) [58]. Plant-mPLoc (http://www.csbio.sjtu.edu.cn/bioinf/plant-multi/) (accessed on 10 November 2024) was employed for subcellular localization prediction [59].

4.2. Sequence Alignment and Phylogenetic Analysis

The Arabidopsis Information Resource (TAIR) database (http://Arabidopsis.org) (accessed on 10 November 2024) was utilized to obtain the 53 AtUBC protein sequences. The 169 GhUBC protein sequences were downloaded from the cotton database (https://yanglab.hzau.edu.cn/CottonMD.1) (accessed on 10 November 2024) (Table S1). MEGA6 software was subsequently used for multiple sequence alignment via the neighbor-joining (NJ) technique with 1000 iterations, and a phylogenetic tree was generated by integrating the GbUBC protein sequence with the UBC protein sequences from Arabidopsis and upland cotton. The ITOL online application (https://itol.embl.de/) (accessed on 10 November 2024) was utilized to display the phylogenetic tree [60].

4.3. Gene Structure and Protein-Conserved Motifs

The length and distribution statistics of the matching introns and exons were retrieved from the cotton database in accordance with the cDNA sequence of the UBC genes of sea-island cotton, the gene structure of the GbUBC gene family was analyzed via TBtools v2.136 software [61], and the protein-conserved motifs of the UBC family of sea-island cotton were predicted via the MEME website (http://meme-suite.org/index.html) (accessed on 12 November 2024). The data were ultimately visualized via TBtools software.

4.4. Analysis of the Cis-Regulatory Elements in the Promoter

TBtools software was used to obtain 2.0-kb DNA sequences upstream from the initiation codon of the GbUBC gene, and the promoter cis-acting elements of UBC family members of sea-island cotton were predicted via PlantCARE. Ultimately, TBtools software was used for data visualization.

4.5. Chromosomal Location, Gene Duplication, and Collinearity Analysis

Using TBtools, the GbUBC genes were mapped to chromosomes from the cotton database (https://yanglab.hzau.edu.cn/CottonMD.1) (accessed on 12 November 2024). For pairs of duplicate genes, the simple Ka/Ks calculation module calculates synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates. A Ka/Ks value greater than 1 indicates positive selection, a value equal to 1 represents neutral selection, and a value less than 1 indicates purifying selection [62].

4.6. GbUBC Gene Expression Profiles

The cotton expression database (https://yanglab.hzau.edu.cn/CottonMD/expression.1) (accessed on 12 November 2024) provides RNA-seq data from various tissues and organs, as well as from plants exposed to a range of abiotic stress treatments and developmental phases. An internet platform (https://www.bioinformatics.com.cn) (accessed on 13 November 2024) was used to generate heatmaps [63].

4.7. RNA Extraction and qPCR Analysis

Total RNA was extracted via a plant total RNA extraction kit (Tiangen Biochemical Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, China). Following the manufacturer’s instructions (Tiangen Biochemical Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, China), EasyScript One-Step gDNA Removal and cDNA Synthesis SuperMix EasyScript were used to synthesize first-strand cDNA. Reagents such as SYBR and MixTaq (TransGen Biotech (Beijing) Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) were utilized, and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) was carried out via an ABI 7500 apparatus, with a total volume of 20 μL. Cotton GbUBQ7 served as an internal reference gene [38]. The 2−ΔΔct technique was used to determine the relative amount, and the data were processed via Excel 2019 software [64]. The primers used for qPCR are detailed in Table S4.

4.8. Subcellular Localization

We used a vector that encodes GFP and added a stop codon-free GbUBC23 coding sequence near the N-terminal region of GFP to construct 35S::GbUBC23-GFP for subcellular localization of GbUBC23. The engineered vectors were subsequently transformed into Agrobacterium GV3101, which was subsequently introduced into the leaves of 4-week-old Nicotiana benthamiana plants. Next, the inner epidermis of the onion was submerged in the aforementioned Agrobacterium and cultivated in sterile MS media. Observations were made after a period of 3 days via a confocal laser microscope (Zeiss LSM 800, Carl Zeiss, Germany). ZEN Imaging Software Version 3.4 was used to collect the fluorescence signal carefully and produce high-quality photographs. Table S4 presents a summary of the specific sequences of the primers used.

4.9. Virus-Induced Gene Silencing (VIGS) of GbUBC23

We used pTRV2 as the virus-silencing vector. We ligated the 320 bp untranslated region of GbUBC23 to the pTRV2 vector through homologous recombination, resulting in GbUBC23-pTRV2. We subsequently introduced the virus into Agrobacterium GV3101 via the freeze-thaw technique. The cotton injection process was conducted following Zhang’s guidelines [65], utilizing sea-island cotton samples that had been infused with the GbCLA1 gene as a positive control. qPCR was used to assess the silencing effect. All trials were performed at least three times, with the experimental design guaranteeing that each duplicate included a minimum of 30 sea-island cotton plants. The primers used for PCR and qPCR are listed in Table S4.

4.10. Plant Materials and Treatments

XH61 sea-island cotton was used as the receptor for VIGS transient transformation and for qPCR experiments. The plant materials used for subcellular localization were N. benthamiana and onion. The seeds of the sea-island cotton variety XH61 were planted directly in black soil. The ratio of black soil to vermiculite was 2:1. The soil was maintained at a temperature of 28 °C, and the cycle consisted of 16 h of light and 8 h of darkness. The robust three-leaf sea-island cotton was transferred to hydroponic cultivation for treatment. After a two-day recovery period, the cotton roots were submerged in a 20% PEG6000 solution supplemented with Hoagland nutrition solution.

4.11. Determination of Physiological and Biochemical Indices

To determine the survival rate of the silenced plants, the control and silenced plants were grown under the same conditions for 7 days, after which the water was stopped until the plants exhibited an obvious wilting phenotype. The plants with a wilting phenotype were counted. For the determination of water loss in sea-island cotton leaves, the leaves of the control and those of the silenced plants were promptly detached and weighed on weighing paper. The samples were subsequently positioned on filter paper, and the variation in fresh weight over time was documented at 25 °C and 70% relative humidity. The fresh weight loss of the sample was used to determine the water-loss rate of the isolated leaves. The H2O2 content, MDA content, proline content, and SOD content were determined via a Nanjing Jiangcheng kit.

4.12. Statistical Analysis

GraphPad Prism 9.0 was used to chart the data, and analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Student’s t test were used for data analysis.

5. Conclusions

In summary, we analyzed 125 GbUBC genes in sea-island cotton and determined that GbUBC23 can increase the drought resistance of sea-island cotton. Although the mechanism by which GbUBC23 responds to drought is not fully understood, GbUBC23 may be involved in the abscisic acid pathway and the clearance of ROS to increase drought resistance. This study not only elucidates the role of GbUBC23 under drought stress but also provides useful tools for crop molecular breeding and biotechnology development.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijms252312948/s1.

Author Contributions

Z.N., Y.W. and Y.Y. conceived and designed the experiments. Y.Y. and Z.N. collected the plant materials. Z.N., Z.Z., J.C., X.S. and J.W. performed the experiments. Y.Y., Z.N., Z.Z. and Y.W. analyzed the data. Z.N., Y.Y. and Y.W. wrote the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Major Science and Technology Project (2024A02002-3), the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region Natural Science Foundation (2023D01B30), the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region “Tianchi Talents” Introduction Programme, the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2023MD734233), and the Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region “Tianshan Talents” Cultivation Programme (2022TSYCCX0080).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data generated during this study are included within the article or its Supplementary Files.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Pickart, C.M. Mechanisms underlying ubiquitination. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2001, 70, 503–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Collins, G.A.; Goldberg, A.L. The logic of the 26 s proteasome. Cell 2017, 169, 792–806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Vierstra, R.D. The ubiquitin-26S proteasome system at the nexus of plant biology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 10, 385–397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Vierstra, R.D. The ubiquitin/26S proteasome pathway, the complex last chapter in the life of many plant proteins. Trends Plant Sci. 2003, 8, 135–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Ye, Y.; Rape, M. Building ubiquitin chains: E2 enzymes at work. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2009, 10, 755–764. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Liu, W.; Tang, X.; Qi, X.; Fu, X.; Ghimire, S.; Ma, R.; Li, S.; Zhang, N.; Si, H. The ubiquitin conjugating enzyme: An important ubiquitin transfer plat form in ubiquitin-proteasome system. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2894. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Hicke, L.; Schubert, H.L.; Hill, C.P. Ubiquitin-binding domains. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2005, 6, 610–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kraft, E.; Stone, S.L.; Ma, L.; Su, N.; Gao, Y.; Lau, O.-S.; Deng, X.-W.; Callis, J. Genome analysis and functional characterization of the E2 and RING-type E3 ligase ubiquitination enzymes of Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2005, 139, 1597–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, P.; Guo, K.; Su, Q.; Deng, J.; Zhang, X.; Tu, L. Histone ubiquitination controls organ size in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Plant J. 2022, 110, 1005–1020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gao, W.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, P.; Shahinnia, F.; Chen, T.; Yang, D. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the UBC gene family in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2024, 24, 341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Jue, D.; Sang, X.; Shu, B.; Liu, L.; Wang, Y.; Jia, Z.; Zou, Y.; Shi, S. Characterization and expression analysis of genes encoding ubiquitin conjugating domain-containing enzymes in Carica papaya. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0171357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Jue, D.; Sang, X.; Liu, L.; Shu, B.; Wang, Y.; Xie, J.; Liu, C.; Shi, S. The ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme gene family in longan (Dimocarpus longan Lour.): Genome-wide identification and gene expression during flower induction and abiotic stress responses. Molecules 2018, 23, 662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Gao, Y.; Wang, Y.; Xin, H.; Li, S.; Liang, Z. Involvement of ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme (E2 gene family) in ripening process and response to cold and heat stress of Vitis vinifera. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 13290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. E, Z.; Zhang, Y.; Li, T.; Wang, L.; Zhao, H. Characterization of the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme gene family in rice and evaluation of expression profiles under abiotic stresses and hormone treatments. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0122621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Jia, L.; Zhao, Q.; Chen, S. Evolution and expression analysis of the sorghum ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme family. Funct. Plant Biol. 2019, 46, 236–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, W.; Tang, X.; Zhu, X.; Qi, X.; Zhang, N.; Si, H. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of the E2 gene family in potato. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2019, 46, 777–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Sharma, B.; Bhatt, T.K. Genome-wide identification and expression analysis of E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes in tomato. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 8613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dong, C.; Hu, H.; Jue, D.; Zhao, Q.; Chen, H.; Xie, J.; Jia, L. The banana E2 gene family: Genomic identification, characterization, expression profiling analysis. Plant Sci. 2016, 245, 11–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chen, K.; Tang, W.-S.; Zhou, Y.-B.; Xu, Z.-S.; Chen, J.; Ma, Y.-Z.; Chen, M.; Li, H.-Y. Overexpression of GmUBC9 gene enhances plant drought resistance and affects flowering time via histone H2B monoubiquitination. Front. Plant Sci. 2020, 11, 555794. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Jue, D.; Sang, X.; Lu, S.; Dong, C.; Zhao, Q.; Chen, H.; Jia, L. Genome-wide identification, phylogenetic and expression analyses of the ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme gene family in Maize. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0143488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yao, S.; Xie, M.; Hu, M.; Cui, X.; Wu, H.; Li, X.; Hu, P.; Tong, C.; Yu, X. Genome-wide characterization of ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme gene family explores its genetic effects on the oil content and yield of Brassica napus. Front. Plant Sci. 2023, 14, 1118339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Xu, L.; Ménard, R.; Berr, A.; Fuchs, J.; Cognat, V.; Meyer, D.; Shen, W.-H. The E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes, AtUBC1 and AtUBC2, play redundant roles and are involved in activation of FLC expression and repression of flowering in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2009, 57, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Lau, O.S.; Deng, X.W. Effect of Arabidopsis COP10 ubiquitin E2 enhancement activity across E2 families and functional conservation among its canonical homologues. Biochem. J. 2009, 418, 683–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Li, W.; Schmidt, W. A lysine-63-linked ubiquitin chain-forming conjugase, UBC13, promotes the developmental responses to iron deficiency in Arabidopsis roots. Plant J. 2010, 62, 330–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wen, R.; Wang, S.; Xiang, D.; Venglat, P.; Shi, X.; Zang, Y.; Datla, R.; Xiao, W.; Wang, H. UBC13, an E2 enzyme for Lys63-linked ubiquitination, functions in root development by affecting auxin signaling and Aux/IAA protein stability. Plant J. 2014, 80, 424–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, S.; Cao, L.; Wang, H. Arabidopsis ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme UBC22 is required for female gametophyte development and likely involved in Lys11-linked ubiquitination. J. Exp. Bot. 2016, 67, 3277–3288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Wang, Y.; Wang, W.; Cai, J.; Zhang, Y.; Qin, G.; Tian, S. Tomato nuclear proteome reveals the involvement of specific E2 ubiquit in-conjugating enzymes in fruit ripening. Genome Biol. 2014, 15, 548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, L.; Wen, R.; Wang, J.; Xiang, D.; Wang, Q.; Zang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Huang, S.; Li, X.; Datla, R.; et al. Arabidopsis UBC13 differentially regulates two programmed cell death p athways in responses to pathogen and low-temperature stress. New Phytol. 2019, 221, 919–934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jin, S.; Youn, G.; Kim, S.Y.; Kang, T.; Shin, H.-Y.; Jung, J.-Y.; Seo, P.J.; Ahn, J.H. The CUL3A-LFH1-UBC15 ubiquitin ligase complex mediates short vegetative phase degradation to accelerate flowering at high ambient temperature. Plant Commun. 2024, 5, 100814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Cui, F.; Liu, L.; Zhao, Q.; Zhang, Z.; Li, Q.; Lin, B.; Wu, Y.; Tang, S.; Xie, Q. Arabidopsis ubiquitin conjugase UBC32 is an ERAD component that functions in brassinosteroid-mediated salt stress tolerance. Plant Cell 2012, 24, 233–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Ahn, M.Y.; Oh, T.R.; Seo, D.H.; Kim, J.H.; Cho, N.H.; Kim, W.T. Arabidopsis group XIV ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes AtUBC32, AtUBC33, and AtUBC34 play negative roles in drought stress response. J. Plant Physiol. 2018, 230, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Sun, Y.; Tian, Z.; Zuo, D.; Wang, Q.; Song, G. GhUBC10-2 mediates GhGSTU17 degradation to regulate salt tolerance in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Plant Cell Environ. 2024, 47, 1606–1624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Middleton, A.J.; Wright, J.D.; Day, C.L. Regulation of E2s: A role for additional ubiquitin binding sites? J. Mol. Biol. 2017, 429, 3430–3440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Bae, H.; Kim, W.T. Classification and interaction modes of 40 rice E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzymes with 17 rice ARM-U-box E3 ubiquitin ligases. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2014, 444, 575–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Yu, F.; Lou, L.; Tian, M.; Li, Q.; Ding, Y.; Cao, X.; Wu, Y.; Belda-Palazon, B.; Rodriguez, P.L.; Yang, S.; et al. ESCRT-I component VPS23A affects ABA signaling by recognizing ABA receptors for endosomal degradation. Mol. Plant 2016, 9, 1570–1582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Jeon, E.H.; Pak, J.H.; Kim, M.J.; Kim, H.J.; Shin, S.H.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, D.H.; Oh, J.S.; Oh, B.-J.; Jung, H.W.; et al. Ectopic expression of ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme gene from wild rice, OgUBC1, confers resistance against UV-B radiation and Botrytis infection in Arabidopsis thaliana. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2012, 427, 309–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhou, G.-A.; Chang, R.-Z.; Qiu, L.-J. Overexpression of soybean ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme gene GmUBC2 confers enhanced drought and salt tolerance through modulating abiotic stress-responsive gene expression in Arabidopsis. Plant Mol. Biol. 2010, 72, 357–367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Wang, Y.; Yu, Y.; Wan, H.; Ni, Z. Sea-island cotton (Gossypium barbadense L.) GbTCP5 improves plant adaptation to drought and salt stress by directly activating GbERD7, GbUBC19, and GbGOLS2 expression. Ind. Crops Prod. 2023, 203, 117209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Cheng, M.-C.; Kuo, W.-C.; Wang, Y.-M.; Chen, H.-Y.; Lin, T.-P. UBC18 mediates ERF1 degradation under light-dark cycles. New Phytol. 2017, 213, 1156–1167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mao, Z.Z.; Gong, Y.; Shi, G.X.; Li, Y.L.; Yu, D.Y.; Huang, F. Cloning of the soybean E2 ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme GmUBC1 and its expression in Arabidopsis thaliana. Hereditas 2020, 42, 788–798. [Google Scholar]
  41. Mittler, R.; Zandalinas, S.I.; Fichman, Y.; Van Breusegem, F. Reactive oxygen species signalling in plant stress responses. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2022, 23, 663–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Nadarajah, K.K. ROS homeostasis in abiotic stress tolerance in plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 5208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mehari, T.G.; Xu, Y.; Magwanga, R.O.; Umer, M.J.; Shiraku, M.L.; Hou, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wang, K.; Cai, X.; Zhou, Z.; et al. Identification and functional characterization of Gh_D01G0514 (GhNAC072) transcription factor in response to drought stress tolerance in cotton. Plant Physiol. Biochys. 2021, 166, 361–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Thirumalaikumar, V.P.; Devkar, V.; Mehterov, N.; Ali, S.; Ozgur, R.; Turkan, I.; Mueller-Roeber, B.; Balazadeh, S. NAC transcription factor JUNGBRUNNEN1 enhances drought tolerance in tomato. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2018, 16, 354–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Zhang, B.; Chang, L.; Sun, W.; Ullah, A.; Yang, X. Overexpression of an expansin-like gene, GhEXLB2 enhanced drought tole rance in cotton. Plant Physiol. Bioch. 2021, 162, 468–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Xu, C.; Shan, J.; Liu, T.; Wang, Q.; Ji, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Wang, M.; Xia, N.; Zhao, L. Constans-like 1a positively regulates salt and drought tolerance in soybean. Plant Physiol. 2023, 191, 2427–2446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Wang, C.; Ru, J.; Liu, Y.; Li, M.; Zhao, D.; Yang, J.; Fu, J.; Xu, Z. Maize WRKY transcription factor ZmWRKY106 confers drought and heat tolerance in transgenic plants. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 3046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Duan, B.; Xie, X.; Jiang, Y.; Zhu, N.; Zheng, H.; Liu, Y.; Hua, X.; Zhao, Y.; Sun, Y. GhMYB44 enhances stomatal closure to confer drought stress tolerance in cotton and Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. Bioch. 2023, 198, 107692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Du, L.; Huang, X.; Ding, L.; Wang, Z.; Tang, D.; Chen, B.; Ao, L.; Liu, Y.; Kang, Z.; Mao, H. TaERF87 and TaAKS1 synergistically regulate TaP5CS1/TaP5CR1-mediated proline biosynthesis to enhance drought tolerance in wheat. New Phytol. 2023, 237, 232–250. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  50. Wan, X.R.; Mo, A.Q.; Liu, S.; Yang, L.X.; Li, L. Constitutive expression of a peanut ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme gene in Arabidopsis confers improved water-stress tolerance through regulation of stress-responsive gene expression. J. Biosci. 2011, 111, 478–484. [Google Scholar]
  51. Fujita, M.; Fujita, Y.; Maruyama, K.; Seki, M.; Hiratsu, K.; Ohme-Takagi, M.; Tran, L.-S.P.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; Shinozaki, K. A dehydration-induced NAC protein, RD26, is involved in a novel ABA-de pendent stress-signaling pathway. Plant J. 2004, 39, 863–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Sato, H.; Takasaki, H.; Takahashi, F.; Suzuki, T.; Iuchi, S.; Mitsuda, N.; Ohme-Takagi, M.; Ikeda, M.; Seo, M.; Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, K.; et al. Arabidopsis thaliana NGATHA1 transcription factor induces ABA biosynthesis by activating NCED3 gene during dehydration stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2018, 115, 11178–11187. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  53. Finn, R.D.; Mistry, J.; Schuster-Böckler, B.; Griffiths-Jones, S.; Hollich, V.; Lassmann, T.; Moxon, S.; Marshall, M.; Khanna, A.; Durbin, R.; et al. Pfam: Clans, web tools and services. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34, 247–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Eddy, S.R. Accelerated profile HMM searches. PLos Comput. Biol. 2011, 7, e1002195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. El-Gebali, S.; Mistry, J.; Bateman, A.; Eddy, S.R.; Luciani, A.; Potter, S.C.; Qureshi, M.; Richardson, L.J.; Salazar, G.A.; Smart, A.; et al. The Pfam protein families database in 2019. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, 427–432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Marchler-Bauer, A.; Derbyshire, M.K.; Gonzales, N.R.; Lu, S.; Chitsaz, F.; Geer, L.Y.; Geer, R.C.; He, J.; Gwadz, M.; Hurwitz, D.I.; et al. CDD: NCBI’s conserved domain database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43, 22–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Letunic, I.; Khedkar, S.; Bork, P. SMART: Recent updates, new developments and status in 2020. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, 458–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Artimo, P.; Jonnalagedda, M.; Arnold, K.; Baratin, D.; Csardi, G.; de Castro, E.; Duvaud, S.; Flegel, V.; Fortier, A.; Gasteiger, E.; et al. ExPASy: SIB bioinformatics resource portal. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40, 597–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Song, H.; Duan, Z.; Wang, Z.; Li, Y.; Wang, Y.; Li, C.; Mao, W.; Que, Q.; Chen, X.; Li, P. Genome-wide identification, expression pattern and subcellular localization analysis of the JAZ gene family in Toona ciliata. Ind. Crops Prod. 2022, 17, 114582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Letunic, I.; Bork, P. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v5: An online tool for phylogenetic tree display and annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021, 49, 293–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Chen, C.; Wu, Y.; Li, J.; Wang, X.; Zeng, Z.; Xu, J.; Liu, Y.; Feng, J.; Chen, H.; He, Y.; et al. TBtools-II: A “one for all, all for one” bioinformatics platform for b iological big-data mining. Mol. Plant 2023, 16, 1733–1742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Yang, X.; Tuskan, G.A.; Cheng, M.Z. Divergence of the Dof gene families in poplar, Arabidopsis, and rice suggests multiple modes of gene evolution after duplication. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142, 820–830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Tang, D.; Chen, M.; Huang, X.; Zhang, G.; Zeng, L.; Zhang, G.; Wu, S.; Wang, Y. SRplot: A free online platform for data visualization and graphing. PLoS ONE 2023, 18, e0294236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Schmittgen, T.D.; Livak, K.J. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat. Protoc. 2008, 3, 1101–1108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Zhang, X.; Dong, J.; Deng, F.; Wang, W.; Cheng, Y.; Song, L.; Hu, M.; Shen, J.; Xu, Q.; Shen, F. The long non-coding RNA lncRNA973 is involved in cotton response to salt stress. BMC Plant Biol. 2019, 19, 459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Collinearity and chromosome localization analysis of the GbUBCs. The heatmap represents chromosome density. The color scale indicates low density (blue) and high density (red).
Figure 1. Collinearity and chromosome localization analysis of the GbUBCs. The heatmap represents chromosome density. The color scale indicates low density (blue) and high density (red).
Ijms 25 12948 g001
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationships among the UBC proteins. Phylogenetic analysis was performed on Arabidopsis (53), G. hirsutum (169), and Gossypium barbadense (125) via MEGA6.06 software. Different colors represent various subfamilies of the UBC gene family. The UBC gene family comprises 21 subgroups, each designated by its respective name.
Figure 2. Phylogenetic relationships among the UBC proteins. Phylogenetic analysis was performed on Arabidopsis (53), G. hirsutum (169), and Gossypium barbadense (125) via MEGA6.06 software. Different colors represent various subfamilies of the UBC gene family. The UBC gene family comprises 21 subgroups, each designated by its respective name.
Ijms 25 12948 g002
Figure 3. Structural distribution patterns of the 125 GbUBC genes. (A) MEME conserved motif distribution. The colored boxes denote various conserved motifs. (B) Distribution of the conserved domain UBCc. The green square represents the conserved domain of UBCc. (C) GbUBC gene structure, with exons depicted as yellow boxes.
Figure 3. Structural distribution patterns of the 125 GbUBC genes. (A) MEME conserved motif distribution. The colored boxes denote various conserved motifs. (B) Distribution of the conserved domain UBCc. The green square represents the conserved domain of UBCc. (C) GbUBC gene structure, with exons depicted as yellow boxes.
Ijms 25 12948 g003
Figure 4. Cis-acting elements of the GbUBC genes in sea-island cotton. Five groups of cis-acting elements were identified in the promoter regions of the GbUBC genes, each represented by distinct colored boxes. Green boxes denote cis-acting elements associated with the light response, yellow boxes indicate cis-acting elements linked to hormones and chemical reactions, pink boxes signify cis-acting elements related to the abiotic stress response, blue-green boxes represent cis-acting elements related to growth, and red boxes represent cis-acting elements connected to diurnal cycles.
Figure 4. Cis-acting elements of the GbUBC genes in sea-island cotton. Five groups of cis-acting elements were identified in the promoter regions of the GbUBC genes, each represented by distinct colored boxes. Green boxes denote cis-acting elements associated with the light response, yellow boxes indicate cis-acting elements linked to hormones and chemical reactions, pink boxes signify cis-acting elements related to the abiotic stress response, blue-green boxes represent cis-acting elements related to growth, and red boxes represent cis-acting elements connected to diurnal cycles.
Ijms 25 12948 g004
Figure 5. Distribution of chromosomal GbUBC segment duplication gene pairs in sea-island cotton. Duplicated gene pairs are marked by red lines. The yellow blocks signify chromosomes. The chromosome number is indicated on the inner surface of each chromosome.
Figure 5. Distribution of chromosomal GbUBC segment duplication gene pairs in sea-island cotton. Duplicated gene pairs are marked by red lines. The yellow blocks signify chromosomes. The chromosome number is indicated on the inner surface of each chromosome.
Ijms 25 12948 g005
Figure 6. Expression analysis of the GbUBC genes under abiotic stress conditions. The heatmap presents an illustration of the evolutionary grouping of the 125 genes belonging to the GbUBC gene family. Blue represents low expression, whereas red indicates high expression.
Figure 6. Expression analysis of the GbUBC genes under abiotic stress conditions. The heatmap presents an illustration of the evolutionary grouping of the 125 genes belonging to the GbUBC gene family. Blue represents low expression, whereas red indicates high expression.
Ijms 25 12948 g006
Figure 7. Expression analysis of the GbUBC genes in different organs and at different stages of fiber development. The heatmap illustrates the phylogenetic clustering of the 125 GbUBC genes. Blue signifies low expression, whereas red denotes high expression.
Figure 7. Expression analysis of the GbUBC genes in different organs and at different stages of fiber development. The heatmap illustrates the phylogenetic clustering of the 125 GbUBC genes. Blue signifies low expression, whereas red denotes high expression.
Ijms 25 12948 g007
Figure 8. GbUBC23 is involved in drought stress and is localized to the nucleus and cell membrane. (A) Expression profile of GbUBC23 in different cotton organs; (B) expression profile of GbUBC23 24 h after PEG stress; (C) sequence alignment of the GbUBC23 protein and its homologs in sea-island cotton, upland cotton, and Arabidopsis. The red triangle shows the conserved catalytic cysteine residue; (D) subcellular GbUBC23 localization in N. benthamiana. Marker: red fluorescent protein and calcineurin B-like protein, nuclear and membrane marker; GFP: green fluorescence protein; Bright: visible light; Merge: merged bright with Marker and GFP; (E) subcellular GbUBC23 localization in onion cells. GFP: green fluorescence protein; Bright: visible light; Merge: merged bright with Marker and GFP. The vertical bars denote the means ± standard deviations, with significant differences relative to leaves and 0 h indicated by ** p < 0.001 and **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 8. GbUBC23 is involved in drought stress and is localized to the nucleus and cell membrane. (A) Expression profile of GbUBC23 in different cotton organs; (B) expression profile of GbUBC23 24 h after PEG stress; (C) sequence alignment of the GbUBC23 protein and its homologs in sea-island cotton, upland cotton, and Arabidopsis. The red triangle shows the conserved catalytic cysteine residue; (D) subcellular GbUBC23 localization in N. benthamiana. Marker: red fluorescent protein and calcineurin B-like protein, nuclear and membrane marker; GFP: green fluorescence protein; Bright: visible light; Merge: merged bright with Marker and GFP; (E) subcellular GbUBC23 localization in onion cells. GFP: green fluorescence protein; Bright: visible light; Merge: merged bright with Marker and GFP. The vertical bars denote the means ± standard deviations, with significant differences relative to leaves and 0 h indicated by ** p < 0.001 and **** p < 0.0001.
Ijms 25 12948 g008
Figure 9. Silencing of the GbUBC23 gene diminishes the drought tolerance of sea-island cotton. (A) Relative expression levels of GbUBC23 in pTRV2 and GbUBC23-pTRV2 cotton; (B) identification of drought-resistant phenotypes in sea-island cotton; (C) statistics on survival rates under drought conditions; (D) rate of water loss in detached leaves; (E) quantity of H2O2 prior to and after drought stress; (F) MDA contents before and after drought stress; (G) proline content levels prior to and after drought stress; (H) SOD contents before and after drought stress. The vertical bars denote the averages ± standard deviations, with significant differences from control plants shown by * p < 0.01, ** p < 0.001, and *** p < 0.0001.
Figure 9. Silencing of the GbUBC23 gene diminishes the drought tolerance of sea-island cotton. (A) Relative expression levels of GbUBC23 in pTRV2 and GbUBC23-pTRV2 cotton; (B) identification of drought-resistant phenotypes in sea-island cotton; (C) statistics on survival rates under drought conditions; (D) rate of water loss in detached leaves; (E) quantity of H2O2 prior to and after drought stress; (F) MDA contents before and after drought stress; (G) proline content levels prior to and after drought stress; (H) SOD contents before and after drought stress. The vertical bars denote the averages ± standard deviations, with significant differences from control plants shown by * p < 0.01, ** p < 0.001, and *** p < 0.0001.
Ijms 25 12948 g009
Figure 10. Expression levels of drought-responsive genes in GbUBC23-silenced cotton. (A) GbRD22 (Gbar_A05G004580.4) expression; (B) GbRD26 expression (Gbar_A01G005760.1); (C) GbNCED3 (Gbar_A13G016670.1) expression. The vertical bars denote the averages ± standard deviations, with significant changes relative to pTRV2 indicated by *** p < 0.0001 and **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 10. Expression levels of drought-responsive genes in GbUBC23-silenced cotton. (A) GbRD22 (Gbar_A05G004580.4) expression; (B) GbRD26 expression (Gbar_A01G005760.1); (C) GbNCED3 (Gbar_A13G016670.1) expression. The vertical bars denote the averages ± standard deviations, with significant changes relative to pTRV2 indicated by *** p < 0.0001 and **** p < 0.0001.
Ijms 25 12948 g010
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Zong, Z.; Chen, J.; Sun, X.; Wang, J.; Yu, Y.; Ni, Z. Genome-Wide Identification of the GbUBC Gene Family in Sea-Island Cotton (Gossypium barbadense) and the Active Regulation of Drought Resistance in Cotton by GbUBC23. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 12948. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252312948

AMA Style

Wang Y, Zong Z, Chen J, Sun X, Wang J, Yu Y, Ni Z. Genome-Wide Identification of the GbUBC Gene Family in Sea-Island Cotton (Gossypium barbadense) and the Active Regulation of Drought Resistance in Cotton by GbUBC23. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(23):12948. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252312948

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yi, Zheng Zong, Junchen Chen, Xue Sun, Jiahui Wang, Yuehua Yu, and Zhiyong Ni. 2024. "Genome-Wide Identification of the GbUBC Gene Family in Sea-Island Cotton (Gossypium barbadense) and the Active Regulation of Drought Resistance in Cotton by GbUBC23" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 23: 12948. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252312948

APA Style

Wang, Y., Zong, Z., Chen, J., Sun, X., Wang, J., Yu, Y., & Ni, Z. (2024). Genome-Wide Identification of the GbUBC Gene Family in Sea-Island Cotton (Gossypium barbadense) and the Active Regulation of Drought Resistance in Cotton by GbUBC23. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 25(23), 12948. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252312948

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop