Next Article in Journal
Distinct Metabolic Profiles of Ocular Hypertensives in Response to Hypoxia
Next Article in Special Issue
Exploring Embryo-Ototoxic Effects: Insights into Deodorant-Induced Hair Cell Damage in Zebrafish
Previous Article in Journal
Principal Component Analysis (PCA) of Molecular Descriptors for Improving Permeation through the Blood–Brain Barrier of Quercetin Analogues
Previous Article in Special Issue
Synthesis and Degradation of Poly(ADP-ribose) in Zebrafish Brain Exposed to Aluminum
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 25
Issue 1
10.3390/ijms25010194
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Zebrafish (Danio rerio) as a Model for the Study of Developmental and Cardiovascular Toxicity of Electronic Cigarettes

by
Eman Hussen
1,
Nada Aakel
2,
Abdullah A. Shaito
3,
Maha Al-Asmakh
2,
Haissam Abou-Saleh
2,3 and
Zain Z. Zakaria
4,*
1
Biological Science Program, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, College of Arts and Sciences, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar
2
Biomedical Sciences Department, College of Health Sciences, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar
3
Biomedical Research Center, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar
4
Medical and Health Sciences Office, QU Health, Qatar University, Doha P.O. Box 2713, Qatar
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(1), 194; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25010194
Submission received: 2 October 2023 / Revised: 3 November 2023 / Accepted: 8 November 2023 / Published: 22 December 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Zebrafish Models in Toxicology and Disease Studies)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The increasing popularity of electronic cigarettes (e-cigarettes) as an alternative to conventional tobacco products has raised concerns regarding their potential adverse effects. The cardiovascular system undergoes intricate processes forming the heart and blood vessels during fetal development. However, the precise impact of e-cigarette smoke and aerosols on these delicate developmental processes remains elusive. Previous studies have revealed changes in gene expression patterns, disruptions in cellular signaling pathways, and increased oxidative stress resulting from e-cigarette exposure. These findings indicate the potential for e-cigarettes to cause developmental and cardiovascular harm. This comprehensive review article discusses various aspects of electronic cigarette use, emphasizing the relevance of cardiovascular studies in Zebrafish for understanding the risks to human health. It also highlights novel experimental approaches and technologies while addressing their inherent challenges and limitations.

1. Introduction

Smoking involves the combustion of tobacco products and the inhalation or expulsion of resulting smoke. This practice dates back to around 5000–3000 BC in South America and Mesoamerica [1]. Cigarettes gained popularity due to their convenience and affordability; however, studies have increasingly linked cigarette smoking to various health problems [2]. Short-term smoking effects, such as coughing, wheezing, and antioxidant depletion, can become evident immediately or shortly after smoking [3,4]. The long-term health effects, including cardiovascular disease, chronic lung disease, diabetes, and cancer, are significant causes of death among smokers [5]. Smoking contributes to the development of cardiovascular diseases such as ischemic heart disease and stroke, the primary causes of mortality worldwide [5,6]. Smoking’s risks during pregnancy are well-established, raising the risks of neurodevelopmental issues, depression, intrauterine growth problems, hyperactivity, and cognitive impairments [7].
Historically, cigarettes were linked to the lung cancer epidemic in the 1940s and 1950s, with evidence from epidemiology, animal studies, cellular pathology, and chemical analysis [8]. Over time, cancer-causing chemicals in cigarette smoke, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and benzpyrene, were discovered [8,9]. It is widely accepted that traditional cigarette smoke adversely affects health, contributing to lung cancer and respiratory problems like chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Despite declining consumption rates, smoking-related lung cancer deaths are projected to increase by 2020–2030 [8,10].
In response to the adverse health effects of traditional cigarettes, people have turned to alternative tobacco products, especially in high-risk situations such as pregnancy. The e-cigarette, designed as a safer alternative to regular tobacco cigarettes, administers nicotine without tobacco combustion [11]. Encouraged by campaigns endorsing their safety, the sales of e-cigarettes have grown exponentially [12]. However, evidence about the safety and impact of electronic cigarettes on human health is limited, and their long-term effects are not fully understood. A study has reported that heating processes in e-cigarettes may generate new compounds with potential toxicity to human health [13]. Despite claims that e-cigarettes contain fewer toxic compounds than regular cigarettes, there is limited scientific evidence regarding the adverse outcomes of e-cigarette smoking, even at low levels, especially during pregnancy [11]. Recent studies show that exposure to e-cigarettes has adverse effects on various age groups, including fetuses and newborns [14].
The concept of electronic cigarettes was developed by pharmacist Hon Lik in 2004 [15], with the aim of obtaining nicotine with fewer toxins. Marketing has labeled e-cigarettes as a “healthier alternative” to traditional cigarettes [16]. Following the introduction of electronic cigarettes to the market, heated tobacco products (HTPs) were introduced, including Glo manufactured by British American Tobacco (BAT) and the Tobacco Heating System (THS) or IQOS by Philip Morris International (PMI). However, there is still a debate about the safety of these devices, and their overall impact on public health is still unclear. Some research suggests that electronic cigarettes might be effective in reducing cigarette consumption. However, electronic cigarettes’ long-term carcinogenic and lung function effects remain undetermined [17].
The primary objective of this review article is to provide a comprehensive overview of electronic cigarette (e-cigarette) use and the current state of research on e-cigarettes. It also delves into the use of Zebrafish as a model for studying the developmental toxicity of e-cigarettes. With the increasing popularity of e-cigarettes and their potential impact on public health, this review aims to achieve several key objectives: synthesizing the existing literature, exploring aspects of e-cigarette consumption, including their chemical composition and implications, and emphasizing the significance of Zebrafish cardiovascular and developmental studies in understanding potential human health consequences. The article further investigates emerging experimental methodologies and technologies within this field, addressing related challenges and limitations. Ultimately, this review endeavors to equip readers with valuable insights into the intricate landscape of e-cigarette research and its far-reaching implications for public health and policy decisions.

2. E-Cigarettes in Smoking Cessation and Harm Reduction

Electronic cigarettes, commonly known as vapes, have gained popularity as battery-operated devices that deliver nicotine and other substances to users through an aerosol [18]. These devices heat a liquid solution containing nicotine, flavors, and additives, generating an inhalable aerosol that simulates smoking without combustion [19,20,21]. Initially marketed as a harm-reduction tool for smokers aiming to quit or reduce tobacco use, e-cigarettes were perceived as a less harmful alternative due to the absence of tobacco combustion [22]. Consequently, they were seen as both a smoking cessation aid and a means to mitigate the health risks associated with tobacco smoking [23,24]. Nevertheless, their widespread availability and marketing have led to their adoption by non-smokers, sparking concerns about their potential as a gateway to tobacco use among young individuals [22,25].
The typical e-cigarette device comprises three primary components: a plastic tube, an electronic heating element, and a liquid nicotine cartridge, all powered by a lithium battery, as illustrated in Figure 1. Users activate the device by pressing a button, which releases a puff of vaporized nicotine [15]. Fueled by the lithium battery, the heating element vaporizes the liquid within the cartridge, which is then inhaled by the user, and commonly referred to as a ‘vaper’.
E-cigarette liquids encompass approximately 60 to 70 compounds, including nicotine, propylene glycol, glycerol, various flavors, and impurities like cotinine and nornicotine [26,27,28]. In Table 1, shows the key compounds of E-cigarettes and their adverse effects to humans. Nicotine, a highly addictive stimulant, can adversely affect brain development and cardiovascular systems [29]. Extensive research highlights the detrimental impact of nicotine exposure on various body systems, particularly during critical developmental phases, resulting in disruptions to brain maturation and cardiovascular abnormalities [30,31,32]. Propylene glycol, categorized as safe for ingestion, can lead to respiratory issues and asthma when inhaled, posing risks to individuals with impaired kidney or liver function [26]. E-liquids often contain toxic carbonyl compounds like acetaldehydes and formaldehyde, which are associated with carcinogenic effects and other health problems [26]. Over 7000 e-liquid flavors lack comprehensive research on their heated inhalation effects, and compounds like diacetyl and acetyl propionyl are linked to risks such as ‘Popcorn lung’ disease, while certain flavoring compounds induce oxidative stress and cytotoxic effects [33,34]. Although recognized as safe for ingestion by the FDA, the safety of inhaling heated compounds remains unclear [35]. Additionally, e-cigarettes carry a high risk of toxic impurities, including heavy metals and tobacco-specific nitrosamines [36]. Carbonyl compounds in e-cigarette vapor can cause mouth and throat irritation, while exposure to formaldehyde, acetaldehyde, and acrolein in rats demonstrates severe toxic and irritating effects [37].
Factors such as perceived harm reduction, appealing flavors, and easy access through social media and online marketing have contributed to the popularity of e-cigarettes [38]. While some consider them a valuable tool for smoking cessation, particularly with claims of reduced harmful chemicals, their effectiveness remains debatable [23,39].
When studying the components of e-liquid, a wide variety of flavors are utilized, serving as a significant factor in promoting initiation and higher usage frequency among young users [40]. Various flavors are available in marketing, including tobacco, menthol/mint, fruit, sweet/dessert, and drink flavors [41]. An international survey of adult former smokers indicated that flavor diversity played a ‘significant’ role in their attempts to quit smoking, reduce enjoyment, and ease the transition from smoking to using e-cigarettes [40]. Certain flavors, like butter-flavoring diacetyl, can trigger inflammation and bronchiole scarring [42], while others, such as cinnamaldehyde and vanillin, promote oxidative stress and cytokine release, hindering innate immune responses [42,43].
Several studies have indicated that e-cigarettes contain significantly lower concentrations of carcinogens and toxins than regular cigarette smoke, potentially making them practical for smoking cessation [37,44]. However, uncertainty prevails regarding whether the low levels of toxins in e-cigarettes fall below the threshold for human health risk [45,46].
A study by Barbeau et al. reported that e-cigarettes help some tobacco smokers transition to a less harmful replacement tool, thereby maintaining cigarette abstinence [47]. In a randomized controlled trial conducted in New Zealand with 657 smokers, the efficacy of e-cigarettes was compared to nicotine patches or placebo e-cigarettes (non-nicotine). Verified abstinence rates after 6 months were 7.3% for nicotine e-cigarettes, 5.8% for patches, and 4.1% for placebo e-cigarettes. E-cigarettes exhibited moderate effectiveness similar to nicotine patches, but their precise role in tobacco control remains uncertain, necessitating further research to clarify benefits and risks [47,48]. In contrast, a German study explored the use of e-cigarettes as an alternative approach in a smoking cessation study. It found that while 12.6% of participants used e-cigarettes during or after the intervention, those who initially smoked more and were more addicted to cigarettes found it less successful in achieving tobacco abstinence than nicotine replacement therapy or no additional cessation aids. Integrating e-cigarettes into abstinence-oriented smoking cessation groups might be counterproductive due to a lack of clear usage guidelines and potential distractions from quitting motivation [49].
Table 1. Key compounds of E-cigarettes and their adverse effects.
Table 1. Key compounds of E-cigarettes and their adverse effects.
CompoundAdverse Effects and References
NicotineBrain maturation disruptions and cardiovascular abnormalities [30,31,32]
Propylene glycolRespiratory issues and asthma [26]
Carbonyl compounds (acetaldehydes and formaldehyde)Carcinogenic effects, mouth irritation and throat irritation [26,37]
Diacetyl and acetyl propionyl‘Popcorn lung’ disease [33,34]
Butter-flavoring diacetylInflammation and bronchiole scarring [42]
cinnamaldehyde and vanillin-flavoringPromote oxidative stress and cytokine release [42,43]

3. Zebrafish as a Versatile Model for Health Research

As the use of e-cigarettes continues to rise, exploring associated health risks, especially among vulnerable populations, becomes increasingly critical. Traditional mammalian toxicity studies, aside from being costly and ethically challenging [50,51], are now finding alternatives in Zebrafish, primarily due to their genetic and physiological similarities to humans [52,53]. Zebrafish offer distinct advantages, including their external embryonic development, which enables efficient monitoring, quicker experiments, and real-time visualization. Their high reproductive rates ensure statistically significant studies, and the transparency of zebrafish embryos facilitates cost-effective drug testing and safety assessments, expediting drug development while minimizing risks [54,55]. Furthermore, their genetic manipulability aids in gaining mechanistic insights, and their transparency allows for internal organ visualization during toxicological research, reducing the reliance on mammalian models and addressing ethical concerns [53,56].
Zebrafish have proven valuable for evaluating the harm associated with tobacco, demonstrating sensitivity to both smoke and nicotine [57,58]. They reveal developmental abnormalities, reduced survival rates, and adverse behavioral effects [59,60], providing insights into nicotine-related diseases, craniofacial defects, and behavioral impacts. This underscores their potential in studying the health risks associated with e-cigarette usage [61,62].

4. Zebrafish as an Insightful Model for Cardiovascular Research

Zebrafish (Danio rerio) have emerged as a significant model organism for investigating cardiovascular development, primarily due to the striking resemblance between their cardiovascular systems and humans, as shown in Figure 2 [63]. Zebrafish cardiovascular development encompasses several key stages, each holding immense relevance for advancing cardiovascular research; please refer to Table 2. Leveraging Zebrafish as a model organism has yielded invaluable insights into heart development, cardiovascular diseases, and potential therapeutic strategies [64,65,66]. Zebrafish also provide critical insights into cardiovascular diseases and regenerative medicine concerning heart repair [67,68,69].
The cardiovascular development of zebrafish is pivotal in advancing our understanding of various critical aspects of human health. The shared conservation of essential genes and signaling pathways between zebrafish and humans provides valuable insights into the intricate processes of heart development and the mechanisms behind cardiovascular diseases; please refer to Table 2 [70]. Zebrafish are invaluable models for replicating human cardiovascular conditions, allowing an in-depth exploration of disease mechanisms and processes [71]. Additionally, the zebrafish’s remarkable ability to regenerate heart tissue, a feature absent in humans, offers significant insights into potential regenerative strategies for repairing cardiac tissue [72,73,74,75]. Researchers can uncover the functional consequences of disease-associated genes through genetic manipulation of the zebrafish, contributing to our understanding of human cardiac disorders [69,75].
Moreover, zebrafish models open doors to personalized medicine, enabling the testing of patient-specific genetic variants and customizing treatment approaches [76,77,78]. In Table 3, we highlight the importance of zebrafish cardiovascular development as a powerful tool with extensive implications for enhancing human heart health, advancing diagnostics, developing therapies, and fostering innovation in drug development.
Table 2. Key stages of Zebrafish (Danio rerio) cardiovascular development and their relevance to cardiovascular research.
Table 2. Key stages of Zebrafish (Danio rerio) cardiovascular development and their relevance to cardiovascular research.
StageDescriptionSignificance and References
Early cardiac morphogenesisBilateral cardiac progenitor cells fuse to form a linear heart tube within 24 h post-fertilization (hpf).Crucial initial step in heart development. Similarities to human aid study [79].
Chamber formation and loopingRemodelling from 24 to 48 hpf forms distinct chambers, and looping results in a single-looped heart.Key stage for atrium and ventricle differentiation [80].
Valve developmentAtrioventricular and bulboventricular valves develop and mature around 48 hpf.Critical for regulating blood flow and potential insights into valve defects [81].
Onset of blood circulationBlood circulation starts at 48 hpf as the heart beats, delivering oxygen and nutrients.Foundation of nutrient transport, tissue development [82,83].
Later development and heart maturationFurther maturation occurs between 72 to 96 hpf, resulting in a fully developed atrium and ventricle with functional valves.Increasing heart rate, organized blood flow [84].
Adult heart structureAdult zebrafish heart has two chambers; atrium and ventricle. Atrium serves as a common chamber.Unique structure compared to humans; fundamental processes conserved [85,86].
Transparency and genetic manipulationTransparent embryos allow live imaging and genetic manipulation for studying gene roles and signaling pathways.Powerful tool for cardiovascular research. Insights into gene functions [87,88,89].
Relevance to human cardiovascular researchSimilarities aid understanding congenital heart defects, potential therapies, regenerative strategies.Translational implications for human cardiovascular diseases and repair [63,86,90].

5. Exploring E-Cigarette Effects on Zebrafish: Innovative Exposure Methods for Cardiovascular and Developmental Assessments

Research investigating the impact of e-cigarette aerosols and their constituents on zebrafish involves carefully designed exposure experiments that aim to replicate real-world scenarios (Figure 3). These investigations aim to uncover potential consequences for zebrafish cardiovascular development and overall well-being. Multiple methodologies are employed to expose zebrafish to e-cigarette aerosols or their components, including:
  • Whole-body exposure: Researchers utilize a custom-built exposure chamber to expose adult zebrafish to e-cigarette aerosols in a whole-body setup. This study assesses cardiovascular parameters and examines gene expression effects [91].
  • Waterborne exposure: Zebrafish embryos are exposed to diluted e-cigarette e-liquids in their surrounding water. This approach explores the impact on embryonic development and behavior [92,93,94].
These exposure techniques allow researchers to monitor Zebrafish health and development aspects. Key parameters such as heart rate, cardiac morphology, blood vessel development, and relevant physiological indicators are commonly evaluated. The insights gained from these exposure methods contribute to our understanding of potential cardiovascular risks associated with e-cigarette use. Furthermore, these studies provide valuable insights into the broader implications of e-cigarettes on both human health and the environment.
Ijms 25 00194 g003
Figure 3. Methods used to expose zebrafish to e-cigarette aerosols or constituents. (A) The utilization of an e-cigarette exposure paradigm for both qualitative and quantitative study. The embryos are subjected to electronic cigarette (e-cig) exposure starting from the 2-cell stage at 1.5 h post-fertilization (hpf) and continuing until 72 hpf. (B) The experimental setup for embryonic specimens; The embryos are arranged in 6-well culture dishes, with a dilution ratio of 1:100 of e-cig. The analysis is conducted utilizing developmental phases as the basis for investigation in zebrafish.
Figure 3. Methods used to expose zebrafish to e-cigarette aerosols or constituents. (A) The utilization of an e-cigarette exposure paradigm for both qualitative and quantitative study. The embryos are subjected to electronic cigarette (e-cig) exposure starting from the 2-cell stage at 1.5 h post-fertilization (hpf) and continuing until 72 hpf. (B) The experimental setup for embryonic specimens; The embryos are arranged in 6-well culture dishes, with a dilution ratio of 1:100 of e-cig. The analysis is conducted utilizing developmental phases as the basis for investigation in zebrafish.
Ijms 25 00194 g003

6. Effects of E-Cigarette Exposure during Pregnancy and on Newborns

Using e-cigarettes during pregnancy raises concerns about potential fetal and maternal health risks. It is important to note that the safety of e-cigarette use during pregnancy is not well-established due to limited scientific evidence [95,96]. Some pregnant women turn to e-cigarettes as a harm-reduction strategy, believing they are less harmful than traditional cigarettes, but this perception lacks substantial support [97].

6.1. Fetal Growth and Structural Abnormalities

Research suggests that exposure to e-cigarettes during pregnancy may negatively affect placental function and result in fetal structural abnormalities. Several studies have indicated that both e-cigarette and traditional cigarette use are associated with a higher risk of having newborns classified as “small for gestational age” (SGA), meaning their size is smaller than expected for their gestational age [98]. Furthermore, the effects of maternal e-cigarette use may extend beyond one generation, potentially impacting the offspring of daughters [99].

6.2. Respiratory and Cardiovascular Effects

E-cigarette use can adversely affect newborns’ and fetuses’ respiratory and cardiovascular systems. Nicotine, a common component of e-cigarettes, can cross the placental barrier, leading to high concentrations of nicotine in fetal serum and amniotic fluid, increasing the risk of mortality and morbidity for the fetus and newborn [100]. Even nicotine-free e-cigarettes have been shown to affect placental function, potentially leading to reduced angiogenesis and trophoblast impairment [95].

6.3. Neurobehavioral and Developmental Impacts

Prenatal e-cigarette exposure has been linked to various neurobehavioral disorders in offspring. Studies indicate that such exposure may increase the sensitivity to neonatal hypoxic-ischemic (H.I.) brain injury, a condition that can lead to cognitive deficits and other neurological issues [101]. Additionally, it has been associated with impaired motor coordination, altered stress-coping strategies, and reduced cognitive function in offspring [102].

6.4. Renal System Concerns

While the adverse effects of e-cigarettes on the urinary system remain less documented, some studies suggest potential harm. E-cigarette aerosols may introduce reactive aldehydes, like acrolein, to the renal system through blood circulation, potentially causing kidney injury [103]. Research conducted on pregnant mice exposed to e-cigarettes during pregnancy revealed an impact on kidney development in their offspring, including a reduction in parameters, glomeruli numbers, and increased oxidative stress [104].
Overall, the health hazards of e-cigarette use during pregnancy and on newborns are primarily associated with the cardiovascular and respiratory systems. While there is limited scientific evidence regarding the urinary system, potential fetal and maternal health risks cannot be disregarded. It is crucial for expectant mothers to consult with healthcare professionals and make informed decisions regarding e-cigarette use during pregnancy, considering the potential risks to both themselves and their unborn child.

7. Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms of E-Cigarette Toxicity in Zebrafish

While the complete understanding of e-cigarette toxicity in zebrafish is an ongoing process, recent studies have illuminated some of the intricate cellular and molecular mechanisms involved. These investigations have highlighted several key pathways, with oxidative stress and inflammation taking center stage. Exposure to e-cigarette aerosols, which contain reactive oxygen species (ROS) and harmful compounds, triggers oxidative stress within zebrafish tissues. This results in elevated oxidative stress markers and the activation of inflammatory pathways [105,106,107]. Additionally, e-cigarette exposure in zebrafish embryos has been associated with DNA damage and programmed cell death, known as apoptosis. Activating these apoptotic pathways may contribute to tissue damage and hinder the normal development of organs [57,108,109,110]. Moreover, disruptions in critical developmental signaling pathways, such as Wnt and Notch, have been observed due to e-cigarette exposure, leading to abnormal tissue and organ development [111,112,113,114,115,116].
Furthermore, changes in gene expression have been identified in zebrafish exposed to e-cigarette aerosols. These alterations in gene regulation may result in the dysregulation of genes essential for various cellular processes, thereby contributing to the observed toxic effects [57,114,117,118,119,120]. Lastly, e-cigarette exposure has been found to impair cellular functions and disrupt cell differentiation in Zebrafish embryos, potentially initiating cascading effects on organogenesis and tissue maturation [109,121]. For a summary of critical cellular and molecular mechanisms identified in zebrafish studies, please refer to Table 4.
It is essential to recognize that the specific pathways leading to cardiovascular damage in zebrafish due to e-cigarette exposure may vary depending on the specific e-cigarette formulations used and the duration and intensity of exposure. Furthermore, the translation of findings from zebrafish to human health requires further investigation, as there may be species-specific differences in how e-cigarette aerosols affect cardiovascular pathways. Integrating findings from zebrafish studies with human clinical research will provide a more comprehensive understanding of the potential risks associated with e-cigarette use on cardiovascular health.
Table 4. Critical cellular and molecular mechanisms identified in zebrafish studies.
Table 4. Critical cellular and molecular mechanisms identified in zebrafish studies.
MechanismDescription
Oxidative stress and inflammationE-cigarette aerosols induce oxidative stress and activate inflammatory pathways in zebrafish tissues [105,106,107].
DNA damage and apoptosisE-cigarette exposure leads to DNA damage and programmed cell death (apoptosis) in zebrafish embryos [108,109,110].
Disrupted developmental signaling pathwaysE-cigarette exposure disrupts critical developmental signaling pathways like Wnt and Notch, affecting organ development [111,112,113,114,115,116].
Gene expression changesE-cigarette exposure alters gene expression profiles (bcl2, casp8, hsp70, Cbsa) in zebrafish, affecting various cellular processes [57,114,117,118,119,120].
Impaired cell function and differentiationE-cigarette exposure impairs cellular functions (cardiovascular system, bone, vascular, and cartilage development) and differentiation, impacting tissue maturation and organogenesis [94,109,121].

8. Comparison of E-Cigarette Impacts: Zebrafish vs. Human Studies

The comparison between zebrafish studies and human research findings regarding the impact of e-cigarette exposure is constrained, as both fields of study are still evolving. Nevertheless, we can draw some key observations based on the available data:

8.1. Cardiovascular Effects

Both zebrafish and human studies have reported cardiovascular effects following e-cigarette exposure. Zebrafish studies have revealed alterations in heart rate, heart morphology, and impaired vascular development [114,115,122]. Similarly, human studies have indicated changes in heart function, vascular health, and endothelial function among e-cigarette users [123,124]. For instance, Palpant et al. (2015) used zebrafish to examine cardiac effects from exposure to nicotine, conventional cigarette smoke, or e-cigarette vapor during early development [114]. Animals exposed to tobacco and e-cigarette smoke exhibited significantly more severe heart defects than those exposed to nicotine alone. However, the impact of e-cigarette flavorings, individually or in combination, on zebrafish development remains unexplored [114]. The lack of precise knowledge regarding e-cigarette cartridge constituents and concentrations presents a challenge.

8.2. Respiratory Effects

Zebrafish studies have demonstrated respiratory impairments following e-cigarette exposure, including changes in gill morphology and reduced oxygen uptake [116,125,126]. In humans, e-cigarette use has been associated with lung damage and an increased risk of respiratory symptoms [127,128,129,130,131].

8.3. Neurobehavioral Effects

Both Zebrafish and human studies have reported neurobehavioral effects following e-cigarette exposure. Zebrafish exposed to e-cigarette aerosols altered locomotor activity and anxiety-like behaviors [59,126,132,133,134,135], similar to human behavioral changes [136,137].

8.4. Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms

Zebrafish studies have identified increased oxidative stress markers and evidence of cellular damage [138,139]. Similarly, human studies have indicated oxidative stress and inflammatory responses in e-cigarette users [140,141,142,143].
While zebrafish studies offer valuable insights into the potential toxicity and developmental effects of e-cigarettes, it is essential to acknowledge that Zebrafish are not perfect proxies for human biology. Variations in metabolism, organ structure, and overall physiology between species may lead to different responses to e-cigarette exposure. Furthermore, human e-cigarette usage is more complex, involving various devices, e-liquid formulations, and user behaviors, making direct comparisons between zebrafish and human findings challenging.
Despite these limitations, zebrafish studies serve as valuable preliminary models for understanding the potential effects of e-cigarette exposure. However, human studies remain essential for providing comprehensive and directly applicable data to assess the health impacts of e-cigarettes on human populations. As e-cigarette research progresses, further integrated studies involving Zebrafish, other model organisms, and human clinical research will contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the potential risks associated with e-cigarette use.

9. Pushing the Boundaries of E-Cigarette Research with Zebrafish Models

As the use of zebrafish models in e-cigarette research continues to evolve, there is a growing need for innovative experimental approaches to deepen our understanding of the health implications of e-cigarette exposure. Here are several proposed methodologies from zebrafish studies that can be applied to advance e-cigarette research:

9.1. Organ-on-a-Chip Technology

Recent insights into dynamic cellular environments and intercellular communication have emphasized the importance of authentic organ function representation. Organ-on-a-chip technology, which provides predictive human tissue models and advanced tissue assembly techniques, holds promise for bridging gaps in drug screening [64]. Targeted toxicological assessments relevant to e-cigarettes can be conducted by integrating zebrafish embryos with organ-on-a-chip technology. This approach mimics human organs, offering insights into the cellular-level effects of e-cigarette exposure. This technology has been successfully employed to evaluate the respiratory hazards associated with fine particulate matter (PM2.5) by replicating the intricate anatomical structure of the lung [144]. Similar approaches can be used to investigate the effects of electronic cigarettes on Zebrafish by cultivating zebrafish cells on microfluidic chips and exposing them to e-cigarette aerosols or vapor, replicating real-life inhalation circumstances.

9.2. Single-Cell RNA Sequencing

The cutting-edge technique of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has emerged as a powerful method for deciphering the diversity and complexity of RNA transcripts within individual cells. Leveraging this technique on Zebrafish exposed to e-cigarettes can reveal gene expression changes at the cellular level, shedding light on molecular responses to e-cigarette aerosols [66,145]. For example, recent investigations have used scRNA-seq to explore the influence of nicotine on human embryonic cardiogenesis, uncovering notable downregulation of specific cell types and key genes pivotal for cardiac development in response to nicotine exposure [146].

9.3. Gene Editing Technologies (CRISPR-Cas9)

Genome editing technologies like CRISPR-Cas9 enable the precise manipulation of genes in zebrafish, aiding in understanding e-cigarette toxicity mechanisms [147,148,149]. CRISPR-Cas9 is known for its swiftness, cost-effectiveness, precision, and efficiency compared to other genome editing techniques, making it a valuable tool for researchers.

9.4. Real-Time Imaging Techniques

Investigating cellular functions, developmental mechanisms, and in vivo processes often requires complex bio-imaging. Real-time imaging techniques like confocal or light-sheet microscopy capture dynamic processes in zebrafish embryos exposed to e-cigarette aerosols, providing visual insights into developmental changes [150]. This technology has been widely used in studies focused on electronic cigarette effects on physiological processes and organogenesis [107].

9.5. High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry

Mass spectrometry imaging is employed to construct molecular atlases for zebrafish larvae, facilitating the examination of specific molecules in different tissues. This technology can identify e-cigarette aerosol constituents and toxicants within zebrafish, aiding in the analysis of potential chemical exposures [151,152]. Integrating this technology with complementary assays offers a powerful approach to examining complex compounds in electronic cigarettes and understanding their health effects [153].

9.6. Longitudinal Studies

Longitudinal studies tracking zebrafish development over time after e-cigarette exposure provide valuable information about potential long-term health effects. This approach is crucial for comprehensively assessing the impacts of e-cigarette exposure and refining regulatory decisions and public health protocols. Given the limited number of longitudinal studies on the long-term effects of e-cigarette usage on human health and fetal development, such scientific endeavors hold paramount importance [154].

9.7. Multi-Omics Approaches and Behavioral Profiling

Integrating data from various biological layers, such as the genome, proteome, transcriptome, metabolome, lipidome, and microbiome/metagenome, enhances the power of zebrafish models to provide a complete understanding of e-cigarette effects [155,156]. Multi-omics approaches and comprehensive behavioral profiling reveal the intricate molecular dynamics underlying health and disease. These methodologies have been successfully employed in studies focused on understanding the molecular consequences of exposure to heated tobacco products [157].
By incorporating these innovative approaches into e-cigarette research using zebrafish models, researchers can uncover complex mechanisms and health implications associated with e-cigarette exposure. Integrating zebrafish findings with other model systems and human data is crucial for a comprehensive evaluation of e-cigarette toxicity. This integration strengthens the scientific basis for policy-making and public health protection by corroborating toxicological mechanisms through epidemiological data, biomarker studies, and risk assessments.

10. Challenges and Limitations in Utilizing Zebrafish as a Model for E-Cigarette Toxicity Research

While zebrafish offer several advantages as a model organism for studying the toxicity of e-cigarettes, they also present notable challenges and limitations that must be considered. These limitations encompass various aspects, ranging from anatomical and physiological differences to experimental methodologies.

10.1. Variability in Anatomy, Physiology, and Metabolism

Zebrafish and humans differ significantly in terms of anatomy, physiology, and metabolism. These inherent disparities raise concerns about the direct translation of findings from zebrafish studies to human health. Zebrafish possess a simpler circulatory system, with two-chambered hearts, in contrast to the four-chambered hearts of humans. Their respiratory system also differs, as zebrafish primarily rely on gill respiration, unlike humans, who respire through the lungs. Additionally, zebrafish metabolize substances differently due to variations in enzymatic pathways. These distinctions may result in differing responses to toxic substances, limiting the generalizability of zebrafish findings to human populations.

10.2. Waterborne Exposure vs. Inhalation

A significant challenge in zebrafish studies is the mode of exposure to e-cigarette aerosols or constituents. Zebrafish are typically exposed to these substances through waterborne exposure, which does not accurately replicate the inhalation route of exposure in humans. Human smoking involves inhaling aerosols directly into the respiratory system, a process that significantly differs from zebrafish immersion in contaminated water. This discrepancy in exposure routes may lead to variations in the absorption, distribution, and metabolism of e-cigarette constituents, making it challenging to draw direct parallels between zebrafish outcomes and human health effects.

10.3. Dose Discrepancies

The doses administered in zebrafish experiments may not encompass the full spectrum of human exposures to e-cigarettes. Human e-cigarette users exhibit substantial variability in device types, e-liquid formulations, and consumption patterns. These diverse factors contribute to a wide range of exposure levels, which may not be accurately replicated in zebrafish experiments. Consequently, zebrafish findings may not fully capture the potential health risks associated with the breadth of human e-cigarette usage patterns.

10.4. Developmental Timing and Short Lifespan

Zebrafish are renowned for their rapid development and relatively short life cycle. While this characteristic allows for quick observations and experimental turnover, it raises concerns regarding the applicability of findings to the long-term effects of chronic e-cigarette use in humans. Many zebrafish studies focus on early developmental stages, potentially missing the protracted and cumulative health impacts that manifest over extended periods in humans. The short lifespan of Zebrafish further limits the assessment of chronic and age-related effects observed in human e-cigarette users.

10.5. Behavioral Assessments and Cognitive Functions

Behavioral assessments in zebrafish studies provide valuable insights into the effects of e-cigarette exposure; however, these assessments may not comprehensively reflect human behaviors and cognitive functions. Zebrafish behaviors are inherently simpler than those of mammals, making it challenging to extrapolate zebrafish behaviors directly to complex human behaviors. This discrepancy complicates the translation of zebrafish findings into comprehensive insights on e-cigarette toxicity in humans, particularly regarding intricate interactions among various e-cigarette constituents.
While zebrafish studies play a crucial role in the initial toxicological screening and mechanistic exploration of e-cigarette toxicity, they are not without limitations. These constraints underscore the importance of complementing zebrafish research with diverse model organisms and human clinical studies. A comprehensive approach combining insights from multiple sources will provide a more thorough understanding of the potential health risks associated with e-cigarette use, ultimately aiding in formulating informed public health policies and interventions.

11. Conclusions

In conclusion, zebrafish research has been indispensable in understanding cellular and developmental responses associated with e-cigarette exposure. Findings consistently demonstrate that, despite some differences between zebrafish and humans or mammals, this model offers a unique opportunity to anticipate health risks associated with e-cigarette consumption in vulnerable populations, such as pregnant women and fetuses. Thus, prompt and legal interventions can be developed to safeguard the well-being of those most susceptible to the potential risks posed by e-cigarettes. As we continue to navigate the complex landscape of e-cigarette use, the contributions of zebrafish research remain invaluable in safeguarding the health and well-being of individuals and communities worldwide, proving its relevance to human health.

Author Contributions

E.H. and N.A., Writing—original draft and Investigation. Z.Z.Z., Funding acquisition, Methodology, Writing—review and editing, and Supervision. A.A.S. and M.A.-A., Conceptualization, Supervision, and Writing—review and editing. H.A.-S., Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing—original draft, and Supervision. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work received support from grants provided by Qatar University, notably the QU collaborative grant QUCG-BRC-23/24-125, and the Qatar National Research Fund (QNRF) through the Undergraduate Research Experience Program, with grant number UREP29-152-3-048. Qatar University funded the publication of this article.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

No data were used for the research described in the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

References

  1. West, R.; Shiffman, S. Fast Facts: Smoking Cessation; Karger Medical and Scientific Publishers: Basel, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  2. US Department of Health and Human Services. Reducing Tobacco Use: A Report of the Surgeon General; Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2020.
  3. Hayano, J.; Yamada, M.; Sakakibara, Y.; Fujinami, T.; Yokoyama, K.; Watanabe, Y.; Takata, K. Short- and long-term effects of cigarette smoking on heart rate variability. Am. J. Cardiol. 1990, 65, 84–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bonnie, R.J.; Stratton, K.; Kwan, L.Y. The Effects of Tobacco Use on Health, in Public Health Implications of Raising the Minimum Age of Legal Access to Tobacco Products; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  5. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease. The Health Consequences of Smoking—50 Years of Progress: A Report of the Surgeon General; Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease: Atlanta, GA, USA, 2014.
  6. Gallucci, G.; Tartarone, A.; Lerose, R.; Lalinga, A.V.; Capobianco, A.M. Cardiovascular risk of smoking and benefits of smoking cessation. J. Thorac. Dis. 2020, 12, 3866–3876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shea, A.K.; Steiner, M. Cigarette smoking during pregnancy. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2008, 10, 267–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Proctor, R.N. The history of the discovery of the cigarette-lung cancer link: Evidentiary traditions, corporate denial, global toll. Tob. Control 2012, 21, 87–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Rubin, H. Synergistic mechanisms in carcinogenesis by polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and by tobacco smoke: A bio-historical perspective with updates. Carcinogenesis 2001, 22, 1903–1930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Behr, J.; Nowak, D. Tobacco smoke and respiratory disease. World 2002, 58, 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  11. Marques, P.; Piqueras, L.; Sanz, M.-J. An updated overview of e-cigarette impact on human health. Respir. Res. 2021, 22, 151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Baeza-Loya, S.; Viswanath, H.; Carter, A.; Molfese, D.L.; Velasquez, K.M.; Baldwin, P.R.; Thompson-Lake, D.G.Y.; Sharp, C.; Fowler, J.C.; De La Garza, R.; et al. Perceptions about e-cigarette safety may lead to e-smoking during pregnancy. Bull. Menn. Clin. 2014, 78, 243–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hughes, A.; Hendrickson, R.G. An epidemiologic and clinical description of e-cigarette toxicity. Clin. Toxicol. 2019, 57, 287–293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Merecz-Sadowska, A.; Sitarek, P.; Zielinska-Blizniewska, H.; Malinowska, K.; Zajdel, K.; Zakonnik, L.; Zajdel, R. A summary of in vitro and in vivo studies evaluating the impact of e-cigarette exposure on living organisms and the environment. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Yamin, C.K.; Bitton, A.; Bates, D.W. E-Cigarettes: A rapidly growing internet phenomenon. Ann. Intern. Med. 2010, 153, 607–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Williams, R.J.; Knight, R. Insights in public health: Electronic cigarettes: Marketing to Hawai’i’s adolescents. Hawaii J. Med. Public Health 2015, 74, 66–70. [Google Scholar]
  17. Drummond, M.B.; Upson, D. Electronic cigarettes. Potential harms and benefits. Ann. Am. Thorac. Soc. 2014, 11, 236–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. National Institutes of Health. Vaping Devices (Electronic Cigarettes) Drug Facts; National Institutes of Health: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2021.
  19. Uguna, C.N.; Snape, C.E. Should IQOS Emissions be considered as smoke and harmful to health? A review of the chemical evidence. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 22111–22124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Traboulsi, H.; Cherian, M.; Rjeili, M.A.; Preteroti, M.; Bourbeau, J.; Smith, B.M.; Eidelman, D.H.; Baglole, C.J. Inhalation toxicology of vaping products and implications for pulmonary health. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kaisar, M.A.; Prasad, S.; Liles, T.; Cucullo, L. A decade of e-cigarettes: Limited research & unresolved safety concerns. Toxicology 2016, 365, 67–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Murthy, V.H. E-cigarette use among youth and young adults: A major public health concern. JAMA Pediatr. 2017, 171, 209–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhang, Y.-Y.; Bu, F.-L.; Dong, F.; Wang, J.-H.; Zhu, S.-J.; Zhang, X.-W.; Robinson, N.; Liu, J.-P. The effect of e-cigarettes on smoking cessation and cigarette smoking initiation: An evidence-based rapid review and meta-analysis. Tob. Induc. Dis. 2021, 19, 04. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kalkhoran, S.; Chang, Y.; Rigotti, N.A. E-cigarettes and Smoking Cessation in Smokers With Chronic Conditions. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2019, 57, 786–791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Brown, R.; Bauld, L.; de Lacy, E.; Hallingberg, B.; Maynard, O.; McKell, J.; Moore, L.; Moore, G. A qualitative study of e-cigarette emergence and the potential for renormalisation of smoking in UK youth. Int. J. Drug Policy 2020, 75, 102598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Public Health Consequences of E-Cigarettes; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, USA, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  27. Cheng, T. Chemical evaluation of electronic cigarettes. Tob. Control 2014, 23 (Suppl. S2), ii11–ii17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Strongin, R.M. E-cigarette chemistry and analytical detection. Annu. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2019, 12, 23–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Varlet, V. Drug vaping: From the dangers of misuse to new therapeutic devices. Toxics 2016, 4, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Ernst, M.; Moolchan, E.T.; Robinson, M.L. Behavioral and neural consequences of prenatal exposure to nicotine. J. Am. Acad. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry 2001, 40, 630–641. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Goriounova, N.A.; Mansvelder, H.D. Short- and long-term consequences of nicotine exposure during adolescence for prefrontal cortex neuronal network function. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Med. 2012, 2, a012120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ren, M.; Lotfipour, S.; Leslie, F. Unique effects of nicotine across the lifespan. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 2022, 214, 173343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Klager, S.; Vallarino, J.; MacNaughton, P.; Christiani, D.C.; Lu, Q.; Allen, J.G. Flavoring chemicals and aldehydes in e-cigarette emissions. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2017, 51, 10806–10813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Taylor, A.; Dunn, K.; Turfus, S. A review of nicotine-containing electronic cigarettes—Trends in use, effects, contents, labelling accuracy and detection methods. Drug Test. Anal. 2021, 13, 242–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hahn, J.; Monakhova, Y.B.; Hengen, J.; Kohl-Himmelseher, M.; Schüssler, J.; Hahn, H.; Kuballa, T.; Lachenmeier, D.W. Electronic cigarettes: Overview of chemical composition and exposure estimation. Tob. Induc. Dis. 2014, 12, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zucchet, A.; Schmaltz, G. Electronic cigarettes—A review of the physiological health effects. Facets 2017, 2, 575–609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Goniewicz, M.L.; Knysak, J.; Gawron, M.; Kosmider, L.; Sobczak, A.; Kurek, J.; Prokopowicz, A.; Jablonska-Czapla, M.; Rosik-Dulewska, C.; Havel, C.; et al. Levels of selected carcinogens and toxicants in vapour from electronic cigarettes. Tob. Control 2014, 23, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Smith, M.J.; MacKintosh, A.M.; Ford, A.; Hilton, S. Youth’s engagement and perceptions of disposable e-cigarettes: A UK focus group study. BMJ Open 2023, 13, e068466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Katz, S.J.; Erkinnen, M.; Lindgren, B.; Hatsukami, D. Beliefs about E-cigarettes: A Focus Group Study with College Students. Am. J. Health Behav. 2019, 43, 76–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Dyer, M.L.; Khouja, J.N.; Jackson, A.R.; A Havill, M.; Dockrell, M.J.; Munafo, M.R.; Attwood, A.S. Effects of electronic cigarette e-liquid flavouring on cigarette craving. Tob. Control 2023, 32, e3–e9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Crespi, E.; Hardesty, J.J.; Nian, Q.; Sinamo, J.; Welding, K.; Cohen, J.E.; Kennedy, R.D. Device and liquid characteristics used with sweet, menthol/mint, and tobacco ENDS liquid flavors: The population-based VAPER study. Addict. Behav. 2023, 144, 107727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Allen, J.G.; Flanigan, S.S.; LeBlanc, M.; Vallarino, J.; MacNaughton, P.; Stewart, J.H.; Christiani, D.C. Flavoring chemicals in e-cigarettes: Diacetyl, 2,3-pentanedione, and acetoin in a sample of 51 products, including fruit-, candy-, and cocktail-flavored e-cigarettes. Environ. Health Perspect. 2016, 124, 733–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Morris, A.M.; Leonard, S.S.; Fowles, J.R.; Boots, T.E.; Mnatsakanova, A.; Attfield, K.R. Effects of e-cigarette flavoring chemicals on human macrophages and bronchial epithelial cells. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 11107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Brown, J.; Beard, E.; Kotz, D.; Michie, S.; West, R. Real-world effectiveness of e-cigarettes when used to aid smoking cessation: A cross-sectional population study. Addiction 2014, 109, 1531–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ghosh, S.; Drummond, M.B. Electronic cigarettes as smoking cessation tool: Are we there? Current opinion in pulmonary. Medicine 2017, 23, 111. [Google Scholar]
  46. Polosa, R.; Caponnetto, P.; Morjaria, J.B.; Papale, G.; Campagna, D.; Russo, C. Effect of an electronic nicotine delivery device (e-Cigarette) on smoking reduction and cessation: A prospective 6-month pilot study. BMC Public Health 2011, 11, 786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Barbeau, A.M.; Burda, J.; Siegel, M. Perceived efficacy of e-cigarettes versus nicotine replacement therapy among successful e-cigarette users: A qualitative approach. Addict. Sci. Clin. Pr. 2013, 8, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Bullen, C.; Howe, C.; Laugesen, M.; McRobbie, H.; Parag, V.; Williman, J.; Walker, N. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2013, 382, 1629–1637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  49. Kröger, C.B.; Ofner, S.; Piontek, D. Use of E-cigarettes as an additional tool in a smoking cessation group intervention: Results after 12 months. Bundesgesundheitsblatt-Gesundheitsforschung-Gesundheitsschutz 2018, 61, 32–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Van Norman, G.A. Limitations of Animal Studies for Predicting Toxicity in Clinical Trials: Is it Time to Rethink Our Current Approach? JACC Basic Transl. Sci. 2019, 4, 845–854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hayes, A.W.; Muriana, A.; Alzualde, A.; Fernandez, D.B.; Iskandar, A.; Peitsch, M.C.; Kuczaj, A.; Hoeng, J. Alternatives to Animal Use in Risk Assessment of Mixtures. Int. J. Toxicol. 2020, 39, 165–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Zakaria, Z.Z.; Benslimane, F.M.; Nasrallah, G.K.; Shurbaji, S.; Younes, N.N.; Mraiche, F.; Da’as, S.I.; Yalcin, H.C. Using Zebrafish for Investigating the Molecular Mechanisms of Drug-Induced Cardiotoxicity. BioMed. Res. Int. 2018, 2018, 1642684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Bailone, R.L.; Fukushima, H.C.S.; Ventura Fernandes, B.H.; De Aguiar, L.K.; Corrêa, T.; Janke, H.; Grejo Setti, P.; Roça, R.D.O.; Borra, R.C. Zebrafish as an alternative animal model in human and animal vaccination research. Lab. Anim. Res. 2020, 36, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sarvaiya, V.N.; Sadariya, K.A.; Rana, M.P.; Thaker, A.M. Zebrafish as model organism for drug discovery and toxicity testing: A review. Vet. Clin. Sci. 2014, 2, 31–38. [Google Scholar]
  55. Zhao, Y.; Zhang, K.; Sips, P.; MacRae, C.A. Screening drugs for myocardial disease in vivo with Zebrafish: An expert update. Expert Opin. Drug Discov. 2019, 14, 343–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Chahardehi, A.; Arsad, H.; Lim, V. Zebrafish as a Successful Animal Model for Screening Toxicity of Medicinal Plants. Plants 2020, 9, 1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Ellis, L.D.; Soo, E.C.; Achenbach, J.C.; Morash, M.G.; Soanes, K.H. Use of the zebrafish larvae as a model to study cigarette smoke condensate toxicity. PLoS ONE 2014, 9, e115305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Klee, E.W.; Ebbert, J.O.; Schneider, H.; Hurt, R.D.; Ekker, S.C. Zebrafish for the study of the biological effects of nicotine. Nicotine Tob. Res. 2011, 13, 301–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Borrego-Soto, G.; Eberhart, J.K. Embryonic nicotine exposure disrupts adult social behavior and craniofacial development in Zebrafish. Toxics 2022, 10, 612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Bailey, J.; Oliveri, A.; Levin, E.D. Zebrafish model systems for developmental neurobehavioral toxicology. Birth Defects Res. Part C Embryo Today Rev. 2013, 99, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  61. Karmach, O.; Madrid, J.V.; Dasgupta, S.; Volz, D.C.; Nieden, N.I.Z. Embryonic Exposure to Cigarette Smoke Extract Impedes Skeletal Development and Evokes Craniofacial Defects in Zebrafish. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 9904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  62. Müller, T.E.; Fontana, B.D.; Bertoncello, K.T.; Franscescon, F.; Mezzomo, N.J.; Canzian, J.; Stefanello, F.V.; Parker, M.O.; Gerlai, R.; Rosemberg, D.B. Understanding the neurobiological effects of drug abuse: Lessons from zebrafish models. Prog. Neuro-Psychopharmacol. Biol. Psychiatry 2020, 100, 109873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Giardoglou, P.; Beis, D. On Zebrafish Disease Models and Matters of the Heart. Biomedicines 2019, 7, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zhang, B.; Radisic, M. Organ-on-a-chip devices advance to market. Lab Chip 2017, 17, 2395–2420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Jovic, D.; Liang, X.; Zeng, H.; Lin, L.; Xu, F.; Luo, Y. Single-cell RNA sequencing technologies and applications: A brief overview. Clin. Transl. Med. 2022, 12, e694. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Yu, J.; Cheng, W.; Jia, M.; Chen, L.; Gu, C.; Ren, H.-Q.; Wu, B. Toxicity of perfluorooctanoic acid on zebrafish early embryonic development determined by single-cell RNA sequencing. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 427, 127888. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Patton, E.E.; Zon, L.I.; Langenau, D.M. Zebrafish disease models in drug discovery: From preclinical modelling to clinical trials. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2021, 20, 611–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. MacRae, C.A.; Peterson, R.T. Zebrafish as tools for drug discovery. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2015, 14, 721–731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Gut, P.; Reischauer, S.; Stainier, D.Y.R.; Arnaout, R. Little fish, big data: Zebrafish as a model for cardiovascular and metabolic disease. Physiol. Rev. 2017, 97, 889–938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Gauvrit, S.; Bossaer, J.; Lee, J.; Collins, M.M. Modeling human cardiac arrhythmias: Insights from zebrafish. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2022, 9, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. González-Rosa, J.M. Zebrafish models of cardiac disease: From fortuitous mutants to precision medicine. Circ. Res. 2022, 130, 1803–1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Stewart, K.M.R.; Walker, S.L.; Baker, A.H.; Riley, P.R.; Brittan, M. Hooked on heart regeneration: The zebrafish guide to recovery. Cardiovasc. Res. 2022, 118, 1667–1679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Sayers, J.R.; Riley, P.R. Heart regeneration: Beyond new muscle and vessels. Cardiovasc. Res. 2021, 117, 727–742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Gemberling, M.; Bailey, T.J.; Hyde, D.R.; Poss, K.D. The zebrafish as a model for complex tissue regeneration. Trends Genet. 2013, 29, 611–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Galdos, F.X.; Guo, Y.; Paige, S.L.; VanDusen, N.J.; Wu, S.M.; Pu, W.T. Cardiac regeneration: Lessons from development. Circ. Res. 2017, 120, 941–959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Brown, D.R.; Samsa, L.A.; Qian, L.; Liu, J. Advances in the study of heart development and disease using zebrafish. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2016, 3, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Motta, B.M.; Pramstaller, P.P.; Hicks, A.A.; Rossini, A. The impact of CRISPR/Cas9 technology on cardiac research: From disease modelling to therapeutic approaches. Stem Cells Int. 2017, 2017, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Brock, A.; Goh, H.-T.; Yang, B.; Lu, Y.; Li, H.; Loh, Y.-H. Cellular reprogramming: A new technology frontier in pharmaceutical research. Pharm. Res. 2012, 29, 35–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  79. Stainier, D.Y.R.; Lee, R.K.; Fishman, M.C. Cardiovascular development in the Zebrafish I. Myocardial fate map and heart tube formation. Development 1993, 119, 31–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  80. Fishman, M.C.; Olson, E.N. Parsing the heart: Genetic modules for organ assembly. Cell 1997, 91, 153–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Thomas, B.; Kuo-Kuang, W.; Melissa, M.; Jihui, R.; Jonathan, A. Early myocardial function affects endocardial cushion development in Zebrafish. PLoS Biol. 2004, 2, e129. [Google Scholar]
  82. Trinh, L.A.; Stainier, D.Y. Fibronectin regulates epithelial organization during myocardial migration in zebrafish. Dev. Cell 2004, 6, 371–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Quinlivan, V.H.; Farber, S.A. Lipid Uptake, Metabolism, and Transport in the Larval Zebrafish. Front. Endocrinol. 2017, 8, 319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Stainier, D.Y.R. Zebrafish genetics and vertebrate heart formation. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2001, 2, 39–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Nguyen, C.T.; Lu, Q.; Wang, Y.; Chen, J.-N. Zebrafish as a model for cardiovascular development and disease. Drug Discov. Today Dis. Model. 2008, 5, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Bowley, G.; Kugler, E.; Wilkinson, R.; Lawrie, A.; van Eeden, F.; Chico, T.J.A.; Evans, P.C.; Noël, E.S.; Serbanovic-Canic, J. Zebrafish as a tractable model of human cardiovascular disease. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2021, 179, 900–917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Lambrechts, D.; Carmeliet, P. Genetics in Zebrafish, mice, and humans to dissect congenital heart disease: Insights in the role of VEGF. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2004, 62, 189–224. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  88. Bournele, D.; Beis, D. Zebrafish models of cardiovascular disease. Hear. Fail. Rev. 2016, 21, 803–813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. Bakkers, J. Zebrafish as a model to study cardiac development and human cardiac disease. Cardiovasc. Res. 2011, 91, 279–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  90. Asnani, A.; Peterson, R.T. The ZZebrafish as a tool to identify novel therapies for human cardiovascular disease. Dis. Models Mech. 2014, 7, 763–767. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Mills, A.; Dakhlallah, D.; Robinson, M.; Kirk, A.; Llavina, S.; Boyd, J.W.; Chantler, P.D.; Olfert, I.M. Short-term effects of electronic cigarettes on cerebrovascular function: A time course study. Exp. Physiol. 2022, 107, 994–1006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Xing, X.; Kang, J.; Qiu, J.; Zhong, X.; Shi, X.; Zhou, B.; Wei, Y. Waterborne exposure to low concentrations of BDE-47 impedes early vascular development in zebrafish embryos/larvae. Aquat. Toxicol. 2018, 203, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  93. Massarsky, A.; Abdel, A.; Glazer, L.; Levin, E.D.; Di Giulio, R.T. Exposure to 1, 2-propanediol impacts early development of Zebrafish (Danio rerio) and induces hyperactivity. Zebrafish 2017, 14, 216–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Bhattacharya, B.; Narain, V.; Bondesson, M. E-cigarette vaping liquids and the flavoring chemical cinnamaldehyde perturb bone, cartilage and vascular development in zebrafish embryos. Aquat. Toxicol. 2021, 240, 105995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  95. Mescolo, F.; Ferrante, G.; La Grutta, S. Effects of E-Cigarette Exposure on Prenatal Life and Childhood Respiratory Health: A Review of Current Evidence. Front. Pediatr. 2021, 9, 711573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Tehrani, H.; Rajabi, A.; Ghojogh, M.G.; Nejatian, M.; Jafari, A. The prevalence of electronic cigarettes vaping globally: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch. Public Health 2022, 80, 240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Fallin, A.; Miller, A.; Assef, S.; Ashford, K. Perceptions of electronic cigarettes among medicaid-eligible pregnant and postpartum women. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs. 2016, 45, 320–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  98. Wang, X.; Lee, N.L.; Burstyn, I. Smoking and use of electronic cigarettes (vaping) in relation to preterm birth and small-for-gestational-age in a 2016 US national sample. Prev. Med. 2020, 134, 106041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Niesłony, F.; Niesłony, D.; Mado, H. Electronic Cigarettes and Pregnancy-What Do We Currently Know? Electron. J. Gen. Med. 2022, 19, em341. [Google Scholar]
  100. Luck, W.; Nau, H.; Hansen, R.; Steldinger, R. Extent of nicotine and cotinine transfer to the human fetus, placenta and amniotic fluid of smoking mothers. Dev. Pharmacol. Ther. 1985, 8, 384–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Sifat, A.E.; Nozohouri, S.; Villalba, H.; Al Shoyaib, A.; Vaidya, B.; Karamyan, V.T.; Abbruscato, T. Prenatal electronic cigarette exposure decreases brain glucose utilization and worsens outcome in offspring hypoxic–ischemic brain injury. J. Neurochem. 2020, 153, 63–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Church, J.S.; Chace-Donahue, F.; Blum, J.L.; Ratner, J.R.; Zelikoff, J.T.; Schwartzer, J.J. Neuroinflammatory and behavioral outcomes measured in adult offspring of mice exposed prenatally to e-cigarette aerosols. Environ. Health Perspect. 2020, 128, 47006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Raja, A.; Zelikoff, J.T.; Jaimes, E.A. A contemporary review of nephrotoxicity and e-cigarette use. Curr. Opin. Toxicol. 2022, 31, 100361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Li, G.; Chan, Y.L.; Nguyen, L.T.; Mak, C.; Zaky, A.; Anwer, A.G.; Shi, Y.; Nguyen, T.; Pollock, C.A.; Oliver, B.G.; et al. Impact of maternal e-cigarette vapor exposure on renal health in the offspring. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2019, 1452, 65–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Noël, A.; Hossain, E.; Perveen, Z.; Zaman, H.; Penn, A.L. Sub-ohm vaping increases the levels of carbonyls, is cytotoxic, and alters gene expression in human bronchial epithelial cells exposed at the air–liquid interface. Respir. Res. 2020, 21, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Wang, L.; Wang, Y.; Chen, J.; Liu, P.; Li, M. A review of toxicity mechanism studies of electronic cigarettes on respiratory system. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23, 5030. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Onyenwoke, R.U.; Leung, T.; Huang, X.; Parker, D.; Shipman, J.G.; Alhadyan, S.K.; Sivaraman, V. An assessment of vaping-induced inflammation and toxicity: A feasibility study using a 2-stage zebrafish and mouse platform. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2022, 163, 112923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  108. Bhattacharya, B. Are E-Cigarettes Safe? A Study of the Effects of E-Cigarette Vaping Liquids on Zebrafish. Ph.D. Thesis, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN, USA, 2022. [Google Scholar]
  109. Ribeiro, T.X.S. The Impact of E-Cigarette Aerosols in Lung Development. Master’s Thesis, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  110. Rowell, T.R.; Tarran, R. Will chronic e-cigarette use cause lung disease? Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2015, 309, L1398–L1409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Cerrizuela, S.; Vega-Lopez, G.A.; Aybar, M.J. The role of teratogens in neural crest development. Birth Defects Res. 2020, 112, 584–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  112. Garland, M.A.; Reynolds, K.; Zhou, C.J. Environmental mechanisms of orofacial clefts. Birth Defects Res. 2020, 112, 1660–1698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Zhang, H.; Yao, Y.; Chen, Y.; Yue, C.; Chen, J.; Tong, J.; Jiang, Y.; Chen, T. Crosstalk between AhR and wnt/β-catenin signal pathways in the cardiac developmental toxicity of PM2.5 in zebrafish embryos. Toxicology 2016, 355–356, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Palpant, N.J.; Hofsteen, P.; Pabon, L.; Reinecke, H.; Murry, C.E. Cardiac development in ZZebrafish and human embryonic stem cells is inhibited by exposure to tobacco cigarettes and e-cigarettes. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0126259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Sarmah, S.; Marrs, J.A. Zebrafish as a vertebrate model system to evaluate effects of environmental toxicants on cardiac development and function. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2016, 17, 2123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Hammer, B.; Wagner, C.; Rankov, A.D.; Reuter, S.; Bartel, S.; Hylkema, M.N.; Krüger, A.; Svanes, C.; Krauss-Etschmann, S. In utero exposure to cigarette smoke and effects across generations: A conference of animals on asthma. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2018, 48, 1378–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Martin, E.M.; Clapp, P.W.; Rebuli, M.E.; Pawlak, E.A.; Glista-Baker, E.; Benowitz, N.L.; Fry, R.C.; Jaspers, I. E-cigarette use results in suppression of immune and inflammatory-response genes in nasal epithelial cells similar to cigarette smoke. Am. J. Physiol. Lung Cell. Mol. Physiol. 2016, 311, L135–L144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Espinoza-Derout, J.; Hasan, K.M.; Shao, X.M.; Jordan, M.C.; Sims, C.; Lee, D.L.; Sinha, S.; Simmons, Z.; Mtume, N.; Liu, Y.; et al. Chronic intermittent electronic cigarette exposure induces cardiac dysfunction and atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein-E knockout mice. Am. J. Physiol. Circ. Physiol. 2019, 317, H445–H459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Orzabal, M.R.; Naik, V.D.; Lee, J.; Hillhouse, A.E.; Brashear, W.A.; Threadgill, D.W.; Ramadoss, J. Impact of E-cig aerosol vaping on fetal and neonatal respiratory development and function. Transl. Res. 2022, 246, 102–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Yoon, S.-H.; Song, M.-K.; Kim, D.I.; Lee, J.-K.; Jung, J.-W.; Lee, J.W.; Lee, K. Comparative study of lung toxicity of E-cigarette ingredients to investigate E-cigarette or vaping product associated lung injury. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 445, 130454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  121. Metzger, H. Differential Effects of E-Cigarette Fluid Flavors on Development and the Impact of Using Zebrafish in the Classroom. Ph.D. Thesis, California State University, Chico, CA, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  122. Ali, N.; Xavier, J.; Engur, M.; Pv, M.; de la Serna, J.B. The impact of e-cigarette exposure on different organ systems: A review of recent evidence and future perspectives. J. Hazard. Mater. 2023, 457, 131828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  123. Daiber, A.; Kuntic, M.; Oelze, M.; Hahad, O.; Münzel, T. E-cigarette effects on vascular function in animals and humans. Pflug. Arch. 2023, 475, 783–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Espinoza-Derout, J.; Shao, X.M.; Lao, C.J.; Hasan, K.M.; Rivera, J.C.; Jordan, M.C.; Echeverria, V.; Roos, K.P.; Sinha-Hikim, A.P.; Friedman, T.C. Electronic Cigarette Use and the Risk of Cardiovascular Diseases. Front. Cardiovasc. Med. 2022, 9, 879726. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Chang, Y.S.; Park, S.M.; Rah, Y.C.; Han, E.J.; Koun, S.I.; Chang, J.; Choi, J. In vivo assessment of the toxicity of electronic cigarettes to zebrafish (Danio rerio) embryos, following gestational exposure, in terms of mortality, developmental toxicity, and hair cell damage: Toxicity of E-cigs to zebrafish embryos. Hum. Exp. Toxicol. 2021, 40, 148–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Lee, S.; Shang, S.; Tsou, S.Y.; Halabi, R.; Ciechanski, P.; Lobb, D.; Logan, C. E-Cigarette Exposure in Zebrafish Leads to Defects in Neurogenesis Similar to Those Found Following Exposure to Traditional Tobacco Cigarettes. J. Undergrad. Res. Alta. 2018–2019, 7, 1–61. [Google Scholar]
  127. Casey, A.M.; Muise, E.D.; Alexander, L.E.C. Vaping and e-cigarette use. Mysterious lung manifestations and an epidemic. Curr. Opin. Immunol. 2020, 66, 143–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Bhatta, D.N.; Glantz, S.A. Association of e-cigarette use with respiratory disease among adults: A longitudinal analysis. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2020, 58, 182–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Osei, A.D.; Mirbolouk, M.; Orimoloye, O.A.; Dzaye, O.; Uddin, S.I.; Benjamin, E.J.; Hall, M.E.; DeFilippis, A.P.; Bhatnagar, A.; Biswal, S.S.; et al. Association between e-cigarette use and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease by smoking status: Behavioral risk factor surveillance system 2016 and 2017. Am. J. Prev. Med. 2020, 58, 336–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Kalininskiy, A.; Bach, C.T.; E Nacca, N.; Ginsberg, G.; Marraffa, J.; A Navarette, K.; McGraw, M.D.; Croft, D.P. E-cigarette, or vaping, product use associated lung injury (EVALI): Case series and diagnostic approach. Lancet Respir. Med. 2019, 7, 1017–1026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  131. Wills, T.A.; Soneji, S.S.; Choi, K.; Jaspers, I.; Tam, E.K. E-cigarette use and respiratory disorders: An integrative review of converging evidence from epidemiological and laboratory studies. Eur. Respir. J. 2020, 57, 1901815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  132. Ruszkiewicz, J.A.; Zhang, Z.; Gonçalves, F.M.; Tizabi, Y.; Zelikoff, J.T.; Aschner, M. Neurotoxicity of e-cigarettes. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2020, 138, 111245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Jarema, K.A.; Hunter, D.L.; Hill, B.N.; Olin, J.K.; Britton, K.N.; Waalkes, M.R.; Padilla, S. Developmental Neurotoxicity and Behavioral Screening in Larval Zebrafish with a Comparison to Other Published Results. Toxics 2022, 10, 256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Massarsky, A.; Abdel, A.; Glazer, L.; Levin, E.D.; Di Giulio, R.T. Neurobehavioral effects of 1, 2-propanediol in ZZebrafish (Danio rerio). Neurotoxicology 2018, 65, 111–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Gauthier, P.T.; Holloway, A.C.; Vijayan, M.M. Vape flavourants dull sensory perception and cause hyperactivity in developing zebrafish embryos. Biol. Lett. 2020, 16, 20200361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Alasmari, F.; Alotibi, F.M.; Alqahtani, F.; Alshammari, T.K.; Kadi, A.A.; Alghamdi, A.M.; Allahem, B.S.; Alasmari, A.F.; Alsharari, S.D.; Al-Rejaie, S.S.; et al. Effects of Chronic Inhalation of Electronic Cigarette Vapor Containing Nicotine on Neurobehaviors and Pre/Postsynaptic Neuron Markers. Toxics 2022, 10, 338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Froggatt, S.; Reissland, N.; Covey, J. The effects of prenatal cigarette and e-cigarette exposure on infant neurobehaviour: A comparison to a control group. EClinicalMedicine 2020, 28, 100602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Platel, A.; Dusautoir, R.; Kervoaze, G.; Dourdin, G.; Gateau, E.; Talahari, S.; Huot, L.; Simar, S.; Ollivier, A.; Laine, W.; et al. Comparison of the in vivo genotoxicity of electronic and conventional cigarettes aerosols after subacute, subchronic and chronic exposures. J. Hazard. Mater. 2022, 423, 127246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Cao, Y.; Wu, D.; Ma, Y.; Ma, X.; Wang, S.; Li, F.; Li, M.; Zhang, T. Toxicity of electronic cigarettes: A general review of the origins, health hazards, and toxicity mechanisms. Sci. Total. Environ. 2021, 772, 145475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Khachatoorian, C.; Luo, W.; McWhirter, K.J.; Pankow, J.F.; Talbot, P. E-cigarette fluids and aerosol residues cause oxidative stress and an inflammatory response in human keratinocytes and 3D skin models. Toxicol. Vitr. 2021, 77, 105234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  141. Gerloff, J.; Sundar, I.K.; Freter, R.; Sekera, E.R.; Friedman, A.E.; Robinson, R.; Pagano, T.; Rahman, I. Inflammatory response and barrier dysfunction by different e-cigarette flavoring chemicals identified by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry in e-liquids and e-vapors on human lung epithelial cells and fibroblasts. Appl. Vitr. Toxicol. 2017, 3, 28–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Lerner, C.A.; Sundar, I.K.; Yao, H.; Gerloff, J.; Ossip, D.J.; McIntosh, S.; Robinson, R.; Rahman, I. Vapors produced by electronic cigarettes and e-juices with flavorings induce toxicity, oxidative stress, and inflammatory response in lung epithelial cells and in mouse lung. PLoS ONE 2015, 10, e0116732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. Muthumalage, T.; Prinz, M.; Ansah, K.O.; Gerloff, J.; Sundar, I.K.; Rahman, I. Inflammatory and oxidative responses induced by exposure to commonly used e-cigarette flavoring chemicals and flavored e-liquids without nicotine. Front. Physiol. 2018, 8, 1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Xu, C.; Zhang, M.; Chen, W.; Jiang, L.; Chen, C.; Qin, J. Assessment of air pollutant PM2. 5 pulmonary exposure using a 3d lung-on-chip model. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2020, 6, 3081–3090. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Qian, F.; Wei, G.; Gao, Y.; Wang, X.; Gong, J.; Guo, C.; Wang, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, J.; Wang, C.; et al. Single-cell RNA-sequencing of zebrafish hair cells reveals novel genes potentially involved in hearing loss. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2022, 79, 385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. He, B.; Chen, J.; Tian, M.; Chen, J.; Zhou, C.; Ou, Y.; Wang, S.; Li, X.; Zhuang, J. Adverse effects of nicotine on cardiogenic differentiation from human embryonic stem cells detected by single-cell RNA sequencing. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020, 526, 848–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Albadri, S.; Del Bene, F.; Revenu, C. Genome editing using CRISPR/Cas9-based knock-in approaches in Zebrafish. Methods 2017, 121–122, 77–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Sharma, P.; Sharma, B.S.; Verma, R.J. CRISPR-based genome editing of Zebrafish. Prog. Mol. Biol. Transl. Sci. 2021, 180, 69–84. [Google Scholar]
  149. Chandy, M.; Obal, D.; Wu, J.C. Elucidating effects of environmental exposure using human-induced pluripotent stem cell disease modeling. EMBO Mol. Med. 2022, 14, e13260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Wang, Z.; Zhu, L.; Zhang, H.; Li, G.; Yi, C.; Li, Y.; Yang, Y.; Ding, Y.; Zhen, M.; Gao, S.; et al. Real-time volumetric reconstruction of biological dynamics with light-field microscopy and deep learning. Nat. Methods 2021, 18, 551–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Yang, J.; Rendino, L.; Cassar, S.; Buck, W.; Sawicki, J.; Talaty, N.; Wagner, D. Optimization of Zebrafish Larvae Sectioning for Mass Spectrometry Imaging. Pharmaceuticals 2022, 15, 1230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  152. Li, Y.; Burns, A.E.; Burke, G.J.P.; Poindexter, M.E.; Madl, A.K.; Pinkerton, K.E.; Nguyen, T.B. Application of High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry and a Theoretical Model to the Quantification of Multifunctional Carbonyls and Organic Acids in e-Cigarette Aerosol. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 5640–5650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  153. Wilson, E.W.; Castro, V.; Chaves, R.; Espinosa, M.; Rodil, R.; Quintana, J.B.; Vieira, M.N.; Santos, M.M. Using zebrafish embryo bioassays combined with high-resolution mass spectrometry screening to assess ecotoxicological water bodies quality status: A case study in Panama rivers. Chemosphere 2021, 272, 129823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Caruana, E.J.; Roman, M.; Hernández-Sánchez, J.; Solli, P. Longitudinal studies. J. Thorac. Dis. 2015, 7, E537–E540. [Google Scholar]
  155. Lee, H.; Sung, E.J.; Seo, S.; Min, E.K.; Lee, J.-Y.; Shim, I.; Kim, P.; Kim, T.-Y.; Lee, S.; Kim, K.-T. Integrated multi-omics analysis reveals the underlying molecular mechanism for developmental neurotoxicity of perfluorooctanesulfonic acid in zebrafish. Environ. Int. 2021, 157, 106802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Li, Y.; Zhang, L.; Mao, M.; He, L.; Wang, T.; Pan, Y.; Zhao, X.; Li, Z.; Mu, X.; Qian, Y.; et al. Multi-omics analysis of a drug-induced model of bipolar disorder in Zebrafish. iScience 2023, 26, 106744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Titz, B.; Szostak, J.; Sewer, A.; Phillips, B.; Nury, C.; Schneider, T.; Dijon, S.; Lavrynenko, O.; Elamin, A.; Guedj, E.; et al. Multi-omics systems toxicology study of mouse lung assessing the effects of aerosols from two heat-not-burn tobacco products and cigarette smoke. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 2020, 18, 1056–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 25 00194 g001
Figure 1. Electronic cigarette device.
Figure 1. Electronic cigarette device.
Ijms 25 00194 g001
Ijms 25 00194 g002
Figure 2. Comparison of cardiovascular development in humans and zebrafish: Exploring signaling pathways governing cardiomyocyte induction. (A) Human heart development. (B) Zebrafish heart development [52].
Figure 2. Comparison of cardiovascular development in humans and zebrafish: Exploring signaling pathways governing cardiomyocyte induction. (A) Human heart development. (B) Zebrafish heart development [52].
Ijms 25 00194 g002
Table 3. Main aspects of the relevance of zebrafish cardiovascular development to human health.
Table 3. Main aspects of the relevance of zebrafish cardiovascular development to human health.
AspectRelevance to Human Health
Conservation of genes and pathwaysShared genes and pathways with humans provide insights into heart development and diseases [70].
Modeling cardiovascular diseasesZebrafish models mimic human heart conditions, aiding disease mechanism exploration [71].
Drug discovery and toxicity testingTransparent embryos enable drug testing and safety assessment, expediting drug development [54,55].
Heart regenerationStudying zebrafish heart regeneration informs human cardiac tissue repair research [72,73,74,75].
Functional analysis of disease-associated genesGenetic manipulation studies reveal the effects of disease genes, aiding understanding of human disorders [69,75].
Personalized medicine and therapiesZebrafish models allow testing patient-specific genetic variants, guiding personalized treatments [76,77,78].
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hussen, E.; Aakel, N.; Shaito, A.A.; Al-Asmakh, M.; Abou-Saleh, H.; Zakaria, Z.Z. Zebrafish (Danio rerio) as a Model for the Study of Developmental and Cardiovascular Toxicity of Electronic Cigarettes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 194. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25010194

AMA Style

Hussen E, Aakel N, Shaito AA, Al-Asmakh M, Abou-Saleh H, Zakaria ZZ. Zebrafish (Danio rerio) as a Model for the Study of Developmental and Cardiovascular Toxicity of Electronic Cigarettes. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2024; 25(1):194. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25010194

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hussen, Eman, Nada Aakel, Abdullah A. Shaito, Maha Al-Asmakh, Haissam Abou-Saleh, and Zain Z. Zakaria. 2024. "Zebrafish (Danio rerio) as a Model for the Study of Developmental and Cardiovascular Toxicity of Electronic Cigarettes" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 25, no. 1: 194. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms25010194

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop