Next Article in Journal
Modification of Serine 1040 of SIBRI1 Increases Fruit Yield by Enhancing Tolerance to Heat Stress in Tomato
Next Article in Special Issue
The Reprimo-Like Gene Is an Epigenetic-Mediated Tumor Suppressor and a Candidate Biomarker for the Non-Invasive Detection of Gastric Cancer
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Inflammation and Myeloperoxidase-Related Oxidative Stress in the Pathogenesis of Genetically Triggered Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms
Previous Article in Special Issue
Correct Identification of Cell of Origin May Explain Many Aspects of Cancer: The Role of Neuroendocrine Cells as Exemplified from the Stomach
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
IJMS
Volume 21
Issue 20
10.3390/ijms21207680
ijms-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Prostaglandin E2 Pathway Is Dysregulated in Gastric Adenocarcinoma in a Caucasian Population

by
Catarina Lopes
1,†,
Carina Pereira
1,2,*,†,
Mónica Farinha
3,
Rui Medeiros
1,4 and
Mário Dinis-Ribeiro
2,5
1
Molecular Oncology and Viral Pathology Group, IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto), 4200-072 Porto, Portugal
2
CINTESIS–Center for Health Technology and Services Research, University of Porto, 4200-450 Porto, Portugal
3
Pathology Department, Portuguese Institute of Oncology, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal
4
Research Department of the Portuguese League Against Cancer-North (LPCC-NRNorte), Estrada da Circunvalação 6657, 4200-177 Porto, Portugal
5
Gastroenterology Department, Portuguese Institute of Oncology, 4200-072 Porto, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21(20), 7680; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207680
Submission received: 29 September 2020 / Revised: 12 October 2020 / Accepted: 14 October 2020 / Published: 16 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Gastric Cancers: Molecular Pathways and Candidate Biomarkers 3.0)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Gastric cancer (GC) represents the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The levels of prostaglandin E2, a key player in the hallmarks of cancer, are mainly regulated by prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2) and ATP-binding cassette subfamily C member 4 (ABCC4), involved in its synthesis and exportation, respectively, and 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (15-PGDH) and solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2A1 (SLCO2A1), responsible for its inactivation. Even though there are distinct molecular signatures across ethnic populations, most published studies focus on Asian populations. Our main aim was to explore the genetic expression of the aforementioned molecules in a Caucasian population. 94 “Normal” and 89 tumoral formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples from GC patients were used to assess the mRNA expression of PTGS2, ABCC4, hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase 15-(NAD) (HPGD), SLCO2A1 by Real-Time PCR. We found an upregulation for the PTGS2 gene mean factor of 2.51 and a downregulation for the HPGD and SLCO2A1 genes (mean factor of 0.10 and 0.37, respectively) in tumorous mucosa in a gender-independent manner. In females, we observed an ABCC4 downregulation and a PTGS2 mRNA upregulation compared to males in tumoral mucosa (mean factor of 0.61 and 1.64, respectively). We reported dysregulation of the inflammation triggered PGE2 pathway in a Caucasian population with an intermediate risk for GC, which might highlight the applicability of aspirin in the treatment of GC patients.

1. Introduction

Despite its declining incidence rates, gastric cancer (GC) is still the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide [1]. Most gastric cancers are adenocarcinomas, which are histologically divided into diffuse and intestinal. The latter is the most common histotype and its geographical distribution overlaps that of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), a causative agent of GC [2]. H. pylori is classified as a class I carcinogen by the World Health Organization (WHO) and is involved in the chronic inflammation that likely initiates the multistep progression of intestinal-type GC [3]. This bacterium is also involved in the increase of prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2, also known as cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2)) expression within premalignant and malignant gastric lesions [3].
PTGS2 is a key enzyme in prostaglandin (PG) synthesis, namely in PGE2 production, and is inhibited by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), such as aspirin [4]. PGE2 is known to be involved in tumor progression and its effects appear to affect virtually all hallmarks of cancer, namely proliferation, angiogenesis, and migration [4]. PGE2 levels depend on synthesis and degradation rates, regulated by PTGS2 and 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase (15-PGDH), respectively [5]. Moreover, the solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2A1 (SLCO2A1, also known as prostaglandin transporter (PGT)) and ATP-binding cassette subfamily C member 4 (ABCC4, also known as multidrug resistance-associated protein 4 (MRP4)) mediate the PGE2 transport in and out of the cell, respectively [5].
PTGS2 is the most extensively studied protein of the PGE2 pathway, both in GC [6], although most studies focus on Asian populations, and other malignancies, such as liver, esophageal, colorectal [7], and pancreatic cancers, where it is overexpressed compared to normal tissue [4]. 15-PGDH is downregulated in several types of cancer and acts as a tumor suppressor [8,9]. Regarding PGE2 transporters, there is a lack of information, but SLCO2A1 downregulation and/or ABCC4 overexpression have been found in some cancers [10]. However, some results are controversial, especially the ones related to SLCO2A1 [11,12].
Even though a study by Kochel et al. [13] reports both PTGS2 and ABCC4 upregulation and 15-PGDH and SLCO2A1 downregulation in breast cancer, no studies address the expression of these four proteins in GC. Since most studies focus on PTGS2 and were reported in Asian populations, the main objective of this study was to explore the genetic expression of PTGS2, ABCC4, Hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase 15-(NAD) (HPGD), and SLCO2A1, the genes encoding the proteins mentioned above, in a European country.

2. Results

RNA was successfully extracted from a total of 94 “normal”-appearing mucosa samples and 89 tumorous mucosa samples. Overall, the PTGS2 gene was found to be overexpressed in tumor samples compared to normal mucosa (−1.95 ± 0.15 vs. −0.63 ± 0.16; p < 0.0001), leading to a 2.51- fold increase in mRNA expression, as can be observed in Figure 1. We found no statistically significant difference in ABCC4 mRNA expression (1.59 ± 0.79 in normal vs. 1.52 ± 0.12 in tumoral samples; p = 0.822). On the other hand, the HPGD and SLCO2A1 genes were found to be downregulated in GC mucosa by a mean factor of 0.10 and 0.37, respectively (4.27 ± 0.12 and 1.40 ± 0.08 in normal samples vs. 0.97 ± 0.19 and −0.02 ± 0.17, respectively; p < 0.0001 for both genes).
Similarly, the expression of these four genes did not differ across early (I and II) and advanced (III and IV) stages of the disease (Figure S1).
We then evaluated the expression profile of the PGE2 pathway across different regions of the stomach. In cardia and gastroesophageal junction, we found a downregulation of the HPGD and SLCO2A1 genes in tumorous mucosa (1.70 ± 0.42 vs. 4.42 ± 0.37 in normal mucosa, p = 0.0005 for HPGD gene; −0.35 ± 0.40 vs. 1.61 ± 0.18 in normal mucosa, p = 0.0007 for SLCO2A1 gene), as displayed in Figure 2. The fundus and corpus and the antrum and transition corpus-antrum demonstrated similar patterns. We found a 2.68-fold increased PTGS2 mRNA in tumoral mucosa in the fundus and corpus, and a 2.40-fold increase in the antrum and transition (−0.47 ± 0.31 vs. −1.90 ± 0.19 in normal samples of the fundus and corpus, p = 0.0024; −0.55 ± 0.21 vs. −1.82 ± 0.18 in normal samples of the antrum and corpus-antrum transition, p < 0.0001). Consistent with the overall analysis, a downregulation of HPGD and SLCO2A1 was observed in GC located at the fundus and corpus and antrum and the corpus-antrum transition (0.62 ± 0.58 vs. 4.78 ± 0.31 in normal samples in the fundus and corpus, p < 0.0001; 0.93 ± 0.23 vs. 4.25 ± 0.14 in the antrum and transition corpus-antrum, p < 0.0001, for the HPGD gene and 0.19 ± 0.38 vs. 1.64 ± 0.16 in normal-appearing mucosa of the fundus and corpus, p = 0.0021; −0.12 ± 0.22 vs. 1.36 ± 0.08 in the antrum and transition corpus-antrum, p < 0.0001 for the SLCO2A1 gene). Concerning incisura angularis, we only had mRNA expression data from three samples in each histological type and no statistically significant differences were found (data not shown).
A similar expression pattern was observed among males and females (Figure 3), although more noticeably in the latter group. Interestingly, the females presented a statistically significant decrease in ABCC4 mRNA expression in tumor samples (1.13 ± 0.17 vs. 1.63 ± 0.12 in normal mucosa, p = 0.025) by a mean factor of 0.71, which was not observed in males. When we compared the mRNA expression of these genes between genders in tumorous mucosa, we found an ABCC4 downregulation in females by a mean factor of 0.61 (1.13 ± 0.17 vs. 1.85 ± 1.17 in males, p = 0.038) and a PTGS2 upregulation by a mean factor of 1.64 (−0.28 ± 0.22 vs. −0.99 ± 0.23 in males, p = 0.028).
Pearson’s correlation coefficient test was computed to assess the relationship between the mRNA expression of the different PGE2 pathway genes (Figure 4). Overall, there was a negative correlation between PTGS2 mRNA expression and the mRNA expression of HPGD and SLCO2A1 (r = −0.384, n = 122, p ≤ 0.0001; r = −0.206, n = 118, p = 0.026, respectively). On the other hand, there was a positive correlation between the mRNA expression of the ABCC4 gene and both the HPGD and SLCO2A1 genes (r = 0.252, n = 189, p ≤ 0.0001; r = 0.447, n = 185, p ≤ 0.0001, respectively). The strongest correlation was found between HPGD and SLCO2A1 mRNA expression (r = 0.561, n = 179, p ≤ 0.0001).

3. Discussion

Despite the continuous decrease in incidence worldwide, approximately 75% of GC patients die of the disease, representing the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths [14].
The pleiotropic activities of the PGE2/PTGS2 pathway and their effect on cancer progression have been reviewed and explored throughout the years, particularly in colorectal cancer [15,16,17,18]. This pathway involves PGE2 synthesis via PTGS2 within the cell and its transport to the extracellular milieu by ABCC4, where it is able to interact with PG receptors (EP1-4) and exert its effects [17,19]. Inversely, SLCO2A1 is responsible for the transport of this PG back into the cell so it can be catabolized and inactivated by 15-PGDH [18]. Dysregulation of this pathway due to PTGS2/ABCC4 overexpression and SLCO2A1/15-PGDH downregulation has been shown to lead to the accumulation of PGE2 in the extracellular microenvironment and, therefore, to contribute to its nefarious effects [18,20]. Inhibitors of the COX enzymes, such as aspirin, are potential agents for chemoprevention of GC, but the association of this NSAID with excess bleeding or gastrointestinal damage remains a concern [21].
Considering that the genetic and molecular signatures differ across ethnic populations [22] and the scarcity of published data, here we report, for the first time and to the best of our knowledge, the dysregulation of several PGE2 pathway-related genes in Caucasian patients diagnosed with GC.
Our results show an increase in PTGS2 mRNA expression in tumoral samples compared to the normal mucosa and, on the other hand, a downregulation of the HPGD and SLCO2A1 genes, in a gender-independent manner. The same pattern was observed across the different regions of the stomach under study, with the exception of the cardia and gastroesophageal junction, where we did not find a statistically significant difference in the PTGS2 mRNA expression between cancerous and normal mucosa. ABCC4’s role as a drug transporter, which may also contribute to cancer progression, has been explored in a variety of diseases. In opposition to what was previously reported in other cancer models [10,23,24], no differences were found in the mRNA levels of the ABCC4 gene. Interestingly, when we compared the mRNA values in the tumoral mucosa between males and females, we found a decrease in ABCC4 mRNA expression in females in our population. Previous findings revealed an overexpression of ABCC4 mRNA levels in female mice kidneys and liver [25]. In the former organ of those rodents, ABCC4 appeared to be repressed by the male hormone 5α-dihydroxytestosterone and by male-pattern growth-hormone secretion [26]. Further studies are necessary to understand if there are other factors contributing to the difference in ABCC4 mRNA expression we observed between males and females.
PTGS2 is undoubtedly the most studied protein of this pathway, explored in a variety of cancers and found upregulated through a variety of methods (northern blot, immunoblotting, and RT-PCR) [27]. In GC, the majority of studies characterizing this protein expression are reported in Asian populations [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36], with few studies involving North American [37], African [38], and European patients [39,40,41,42]. Overall, in those studies, a similar expression pattern is found between distinct ethnic populations, with a higher PTGS2 expression in tumoral samples compared to normal tissue and an increased expression with the progression of mucosal damage.
The role of 15-PGDH in GC is still somewhat controversial. While some studies report a decreased expression of this protein in gastric malignancies compared to normal gastric tissues, others show no such difference [8,43,44,45,46,47]. It is noteworthy that all these studies were performed in either Chinese or Korean populations. Moreover, 15-PGDH has been regarded as a tumor suppressor by some reports and has been associated with the development of gastric carcinoma by inducing apoptosis and cell cycle arrest [8,44,45,46]. The correlation between 15-PGDH expression and some pathological findings has also been controversial. Some authors defend no correlation between the expression of this enzyme and the tumor-node-metastasis stage, vascular invasion, and tumor histologic type [45,48], whereas a study by Seo et al. [47] reports a significant correlation between 15-PGDH expression and the T and N stage, pathologic type, metastasis, vascular, lymphatic, and perineural invasion, and palliative gastrectomy. In addition, that study associates the expression of 15-PGDH with five-year gastric-cancer-specific survival, but it does not classify it as an independent prognostic factor [47]. On the other hand, Tatsuwaki et al. [49] performed a multivariate analysis and concluded that reduction of 15-PGDH expression could, in fact, be an independent predictor of poor survival and it was correlated with differentiation, disease stage, which was not observed in our study, and prognosis. Furthermore, H. pylori infection appears to promote gastric carcinogenesis by modulating both HPGD and PTGS2 mRNA expression and protein synthesis [31,50].
As mentioned previously, not much is known about the PGE2 transporters in GC. Reduced SLCO2A1 expression has been associated with increasing PGE2 levels in the tumor microenvironment and, consequently, with tumor angiogenesis in GC [51]. Moreover, colocalization of this transporter and the PGE2 receptor EP4 has been detected in the mucosa of both normal stomach and gastric carcinoma, suggesting a role of SLCO2A1 in the PGE2-mediated cellular effects [52]. In the same study, by Bujok et al. [52], a higher expression of the protein was found in GC tissue compared to normal tissue, but with no statistical significance. Takeda et al. [53] were the first to identify SLCO2A1 expression as an independent predictor of poor prognosis in patients with GC. In this study, reduction of the transporter expression correlated with increased tumor angiogenesis and its suppression by specific small interfering RNA (siRNA) promoted the production of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), a mediator of angiogenesis, induced by PGE2 [53]. Furthermore, the immunohistochemical staining showed a diffuse SLCO2A1 expression in normal gland epithelial cells of the stomach, similar to other expression patterns reported previously in normal intestinal cells and suggesting a strict regulation of PGE2 concentration to maintain cellular homeostasis [53]. The authors presume that this homeostasis is impaired in gastric tumors due to the negative regulation of SLCO2A1 and, consequently, the negative regulation of PGE2 degradation, resulting in the enhancement of PGE2 signaling and gastric tumorigenesis [53]. Contrary to those reports, a study by Nakanishi et al. [54] suggests an association between higher SLCO2A1 expression in colorectal cancer and poor prognosis. The authors indicate a likely promotion of tumorigenesis by PGE2 uptake into the endothelial cells via this transporter [54]. In ovarian cancer, both increased and reduced levels of SLCO2A1 have been reported [55,56]. In sum, in this study, we found a dysregulation in the PGE2 pathway in Caucasian GC patients. PTGS2 mRNA expression was found to be negatively correlated with HPGD and SLCO2A1 expression, whereas ABCC4, HPGD, and SLCO2A1 expressions were positively correlated. Despite a similar pattern reported for PTGS2, HPGD, and SLCO2A1 genes, the heterogeneous expression of ABCC4 in GC across ethnicities might contribute to explain the differences observed in GC incidence worldwide.
There have been reports on distinct biological and transcriptomic signatures between cancer, normal adjacent mucosa, and healthy tissues [57,58]. Even though we performed macrodissection of normal tissue distant from the tumoral cells whenever feasible, it is possible that the use of these samples as controls could lead to suboptimal results.
Currently, in countries with moderate to low incidences, such as Portugal, mass screening such as the one observed in Japan and Korea is unwarranted [59]. Nevertheless, the stratification of the population by GC risk might allow a personalized screening/surveillance, namely by targeted screening, optimization of surveillance intervals, and even selection for chemoprevention. The identification of mRNA transcripts associated with cancer development is a step towards personalized medicine. Furthermore, we reported an increased PTGS2 mRNA expression in tumoral samples, hence, it is plausible that if one could identify individuals with a higher probability of overexpressing PTGS2, these might be targeted towards NSAIDs-base GC chemopreventive strategies.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Patient Samples

This study was approved by the Ethics Committee at the Instituto Português de Oncologia do Porto (IPO-Porto) on 15 December 2016 (CES.314/016). Furthermore, the study protocol conforms to the Declaration of Helsinki ethical guidelines as reflected in a priori approval by the Research Centre at IPO-Porto (CI-IPOP 48-2016). After revision of the histopathological database from the Pathology department at IPO-Porto, 121 patients with histological confirmation of intestinal-type GC, diagnosed between May 2012 and December 2015, were randomly selected from a consecutive series of cases based on the availability of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples. Written informed consent was previously given by each patient authorizing the inclusion of surplus tissues in the Institute’s tumors’ biobank for future use in biomedical research. The description of the population is summarized in Table 1. Overall, the median age of the participants was 70 years with males representing 50% of cases. Most tumors were located in the antrum and corpus-antrum transition (60%) and presented moderately differentiated cells (56%). Concerning tumor staging, nearly half the GC patients were diagnosed in early stages of the disease (49% for stages I and II vs. 51% for stages III and IV). No differences in the demographic and tumor characteristics variables were observed between the participants in this study and the overall population of GC patients.
Medical records were reviewed to extract the clinicopathological variables, such as localization, stage, and tumor grade. All tumors were restaged according to the eighth edition of the AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer) Cancer Staging Manual [60].

4.2. Nucleic Acid Isolation and Quantification

RNA was extracted from FFPE samples using the AllPrep DNA/RNA FFPE Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. A 3 µm section stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) was histopathologically characterized at the Pathology Department at IPO-Porto and the number of 10 µm sections used for nucleic acid extraction varied from two to six, depending on the size of the limited area (up to 6 cm2) enriched in “normal”, distant from the tumor whenever possible, or tumoral cells. Using a sterile single-use scalpel, the area was macrodissected into a 1.5 mL microcentrifuge tube containing 1 mL of deparaffination reagent D-limonene (Santa Cruz, Dallas, TX, USA) by scratching. The kit instructions were followed throughout the remaining procedure.
The resulting RNA was quantified using the NanoDropTM Lite Spectrophotometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), its quality was assessed by measuring the optical density (OD) 260/280 ratio, and it was kept at −20 °C until further processing.

4.3. Reverse Transcription Reaction

Approximately one hundred samples of “normal”-appearing mucosa and one hundred samples of tumoral mucosa were included in the study. Complementary DNA (cDNA) was synthesized from up to 2 µg of RNA using the High Capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription (RT) kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, in a 20 µL reaction mix, 2.0 µL of 10X RT Buffer, 0.8 µL of 25X dNTP Mix (100 mM), 2.0 µL of 10X RT Random Primers, 1.0 µL of MultiScribe Reverse Transcriptase, 4.2 µL of nuclease-free water, and 10.0 µL of RNA were used. The RT conditions were as follows: Annealing at 25 °C for 10 min, DNA polymerization at 37 °C for 120 min, and enzyme deactivation at 85 °C for 5 min.
All RT reactions included one no-template negative control. Moreover, 1 µL containing 1 µg of the QPCR Human Reference Total RNA, part of the Absolutely RNA FFPE Kit (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA), was used as a positive control to monitor the quality of the RT.

4.4. Real-Time PCR

cDNA amplification by Real-Time PCR was performed using a StepOne Plus Real-Time PCR system (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). In a 10 µL reaction mix, 5.0 µL of TaqMan® Gene Expression Master Mix (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), 0.5 µL of TaqMan® Gene Expression Assay (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), and 20 ng of cDNA template were used.
The gene expression assays used to measure the mRNA expression of the PTGS2, HPGD, ABCC4, and SLCO2A1 genes were Hs00153133_m1, Hs00168359_m1, Hs00988717_m1, and Hs01114926_m1 (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), respectively. All assays underwent the following thermal cycling conditions: 50 °C for 2 min, 95 °C for 10 min, and 40 cycles of 95 °C for 15 s and 60 °C for 1 min. They were validated to determine the efficiency of the amplification reaction and their limit of detection using a 1:2 dilution series with 7 dilution steps. As a result, efficiencies between 90–105% and sensitivity above 6.25 ng were reported for all gene expression assays used.
A panel of six reference genes (B2M, HPRT1, RPL29, PPIA, IPO8, and GUSB) was selected, after reviewing the literature on gastrointestinal cancers, to determine the most adequate for this experiment using the NormFinder and geNorm softwares (25, 26). The gene expression was assessed using the Hs00187842_m1, Hs02800695_m1, Hs00988959_gH, Hs99999904_m1, Hs00914057_m1, and Hs99999908_m1 TaqMan® gene expression assays (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA), respectively. HPRT1 and IPO8 were selected as the most stable combination of genes to normalize our results, with a stability value of 0.094 (determined by NormFinder). The stability values of all the genes are displayed in Table S1.
Triplicates were used for mRNA quantification using real-time PCR and replicates with a standard deviation (SD) superior to 30% of 1 cycle threshold (CT) were excluded. For each sample, all target and reference genes were amplified in the same plate. Additionally, one positive control from the RT reaction and three no template negative controls were included. The endpoint of the real-time PCR was the CT determined as the average value from three independent reactions.

4.5. Statistical Analysis

The relative mRNA expression was expressed as the difference between CTS of the amplification curves of the target genes (PTGS2, ABCC4, HPGD, and SLCO2A1) and the reference genes (−∆CT). The expression fold-change was calculated following the Livak method (2−∆∆Ct) [61].
Statistical analysis was performed using the computer software IBM® SPSS® Statistics (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA) version 26.0 for Windows. Additionally, GraphPad Prism version 8.00 for Windows was used to obtain graphical designs. Student’s t-test was performed to compare mean values between values (normal vs. tumor, female vs. male) and the correspondent nonparametric tests were applied when appropriate. Values were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.
All authors had access to the study data and have reviewed and approved the final manuscript.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/21/20/7680/s1, Figure S1. mRNA expression across GC stages. Table S1. Stability expression values for normalization of GC and GN samples from NormFinder and GeNorm softwares.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.P., R.M. and M.D.-R.; Data curation, C.P.; Formal analysis, C.L. and C.P.; Funding acquisition, C.P. and M.D.-R.; Investigation, C.L.; Methodology, C.P; Project administration, C.P.; Resources, M.F. and R.M.; Supervision, C.P.; Visualization, C.L.; Writing—original draft, C.L.; Writing—review & editing, C.P., R.M. and M.D.-R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was funded by a research grant from the Sociedade Portuguesa de Gastrenterologia (Nº1/2016). Furthermore, Carina Pereira is a research fellowship holder (SFRH/BPD/114803/2016) supported by Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT), co-financed by European Social Funds (ESF) and national funds of MCTES under the Human Strategic Reference Framework (POCH).

Acknowledgments

We kindly acknowledge the laboratory work related to FFPE slides preparation performed by the technician Fernanda Silva and Jorge Ferreira at the Pathology department at IPO-Porto.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

15-PGDH15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase
ABCC4ATP-binding cassette subfamily C member 4
AJCCAmerican Joint Committee on Cancer
B2MBeta-2-microglobulin
cDNAComplementary deoxyribonucleic acid
COX-2Cyclooxygenase-2
CTCycle threshold
EPProstaglandin E2 receptor
FFPEFormalin-fixed paraffin-embedded
GCGastric cancer
GUSBGlucuronidase beta
H&EHematoxylin & eosin
H. pyloriHelicobacter pylori
HPGDHydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase 15-(NAD)
HPRT1Hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase 1
IPO8Importin 8
mRNAMessenger ribonucleic acid
MRP4Multidrug resistance protein 4
NSAIDsNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
ODOptical density
PCRPolymerase chain reaction
PGE2Prostaglandin E2
PGTProstaglandin transporter
PPIAPeptidylprolyl isomerase A
PTGS2Prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2
RPL29Ribosomal protein L29
RTReverse transcription
SDStandard deviation
siRNASmall interfering ribonucleic acid
SLCO2A1Solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2A1
SPSSStatistical package for the social sciences
VEGFVascular endothelial growth factor
WHOWorld Health Organization

References

  1. Bray, F.; Ferlay, J.; Soerjomataram, I.; Siegel, R.L.; Torre, L.A.; Jemal, A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA A Cancer J. Clin. 2018, 68, 394–424. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Rugge, M.; Fassan, M.; Graham, D.Y. Epidemiology of Gastric Cancer. In Gastric Cancer: Principles and Practice; Strong, V.E., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2015; pp. 23–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Israel, D.A.; Peek, R.M. Chapter 63—Mechanisms of Helicobacter Pylori-Induced Gastric Inflammation. In Physiology of the Gastrointestinal Tract, 6th ed.; Said, H.M., Ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 2018; pp. 1517–1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Nagaraju, G.P.; El-Rayes, B.F. Cyclooxygenase-2 in gastrointestinal malignancies. Cancer 2019, 125, 1221–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Tong, D.; Liu, Q.; Wang, L.-A.; Xie, Q.; Pang, J.; Huang, Y.; Wang, L.; Liu, G.; Zhang, D.; Lan, W.; et al. The roles of the COX2/PGE2/EP axis in therapeutic resistance. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2018, 37, 355–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Song, J.; Su, H.; Zhou, Y.-Y.; Guo, L.-L. Cyclooxygenase-2 Expression Is Associated with Poor Overall Survival of Patients with Gastric Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Dig. Dis. Sci. 2014, 59, 436–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kasper, H.U.; Konze, E.; Dienes, H.P.; Stippel, D.L.; Schirmacher, P.; Kern, M. COX-2 expression and effects of COX-2 inhibition in colorectal carcinomas and their liver metastases. Anticancer Res. 2010, 30, 2017–2023. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  8. Song, H.J.; Myung, S.J.; Kim, I.W.; Jeong, J.Y.; Park, Y.S.; Lee, S.M.; Nam, W.H.; Ryu, Y.M.; Fink, S.P.; Yang, D.H.; et al. 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase is downregulated and exhibits tumor suppressor activity in gastric cancer. Cancer Investig. 2011, 29, 257–265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wolf, I.; O’Kelly, J.; Rubinek, T.; Tong, M.; Nguyen, A.; Lin, B.T.; Tai, H.-H.; Karlan, B.Y.; Koeffler, H.P. 15-Hydroxyprostaglandin Dehydrogenase Is a Tumor Suppressor of Human Breast Cancer. Cancer Res. 2006, 66, 7818–7823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  10. Ho, L.L.; Kench, J.G.; Handelsman, D.J.; Scheffer, G.L.; Stricker, P.D.; Grygiel, J.G.; Sutherland, R.L.; Henshall, S.M.; Allen, J.D.; Horvath, L.G. Androgen regulation of multidrug resistance-associated protein 4 (MRP4/ABCC4) in prostate cancer. Prostate 2008, 68, 1421–1429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Wlcek, K.; Svoboda, M.; Sellner, F.; Krupitza, G.; Jaeger, W.; Thalhammer, T. Altered expression of organic anion transporter polypeptide (OATP) genes in human breast carcinoma. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2008, 7, 1450–1455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Hays, A.; Apte, U.; Hagenbuch, B. Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptides Expressed in Pancreatic Cancer May Serve As Potential Diagnostic Markers and Therapeutic Targets for Early Stage Adenocarcinomas. Pharm. Res. 2013, 30, 2260–2269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Kochel, T.J.; Goloubeva, O.G.; Fulton, A.M. Upregulation of Cyclooxygenase-2/Prostaglandin E2 (COX-2/PGE2) Pathway Member Multiple Drug Resistance-Associated Protein 4 (MRP4) and Downregulation of Prostaglandin Transporter (PGT) and 15-Prostaglandin Dehydrogenase (15-PGDH) in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Breast Cancer Basic Clin. Res. 2016, 10, 61–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Park, S.R. Management of gastric cancer: East vs West. Curr. Probl. Cancer 2015, 39, 315–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zmigrodzka, M.; Rzepecka, A.; Krzyzowska, M.; Witkowska-Pilaszewicz, O.; Cywinska, A.; Winnicka, A. The cyclooxygenase-2/prostaglandin E2 pathway and its role in the pathogenesis of human and dog hematological malignancies. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2018, 69, 653–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Goradel, N.H.; Najafi, M.; Salehi, E.; Farhood, B.; Mortezaee, K. Cyclooxygenase-2 in cancer: A review. J. Cell. Phisiol. 2019, 234, 5683–5699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Kobayashi, K.; Omori, K.; Murata, T. Role of prostaglandins in tumor microenvironment. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2018, 37, 347–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Greenhough, A.; Smartt, H.J.M.; Moore, A.E.; Roberts, H.R.; Williams, A.C.; Paraskeva, C.; Kaidi, A. The COX-2/PGE2 pathway: Key roles in the hallmarks of cancer and adaptation to the tumour microenvironment. Carcinogenesis 2009, 30, 377–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Karpisheh, V.; Nikkhoo, A.; Hojjat-Farsangi, M.; Namdar, A.; Azizi, G.; Ghalamfarsa, G.; Sabz, G.; Yousefi, M.; Yousefi, B.; Jadidi-Niaragh, F. Prostaglandin E2 as a potent therapeutic target for treatment of colon cancer. Prostaglandins Other Lipid Mediat. 2019, 144, 106338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Nakanishi, M.; Rosenberg, D.W. Multifaceted roles of PGE2 in inflammation and cancer. Semin. Immunopathol. 2013, 35, 123–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Thorat, M.A.; Cuzick, J. Role of Aspirin in Cancer Prevention. Curr. Oncol. Rep. 2013, 15, 533–540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lin, S.J.; Gagnon-Bartsch, J.A.; Tan, I.B.; Earle, S.; Ruff, L.; Pettinger, K.; Ylstra, B.; van Grieken, N.; Rha, S.Y.; Chung, H.C.; et al. Signatures of tumour immunity distinguish Asian and non-Asian gastric adenocarcinomas. Gut 2015, 64, 1721–1731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Zhao, X.; Guo, Y.; Yue, W.; Zhang, L.; Gu, M.; Wang, Y. ABCC4 is required for cell proliferation and tumorigenesis in non-small cell lung cancer. OncoTargets Ther. 2014, 7, 343–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Borel, F.; Han, R.; Visser, A.; Petry, H.; van Deventer, S.J.H.; Jansen, P.L.M.; Konstantinova, P.; Collaboration of the Réseau Centre de Ressources Biologiques Foie. Adenosine triphosphate-binding cassette transporter genes up-regulation in untreated hepatocellular carcinoma is mediated by cellular microRNAs. Hepatology 2012, 55, 821–832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Maher, J.M.; Slitt, A.L.; Cherrington, N.J.; Cheng, X.; Klaassen, C.D. Tissue Distribution and Hepatic and Renal Ontogeny of the Multidrug Resistance-Associated Protein (MRP) Family in Mice. Drug Metab. Dispos. 2005, 33, 947–955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Maher, J.M.; Cheng, X.; Tanaka, Y.; Scheffer, G.L.; Klaassen, C.D. Hormonal regulation of renal multidrug resistance-associated proteins 3 and 4 (Mrp3 and Mrp4) in mice. Biochem. Pharmacol. 2006, 71, 1470–1478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Fujimura, T.; Ohta, T.; Oyama, K.; Miyashita, T.; Miwa, K. Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) in carcinogenesis and selective COX-2 inhibitors for chemoprevention in gastrointestinal cancers. J. Gastrointest. Cancer 2007, 38, 78–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Da, M.-X.; Wu, X.-T.; Wang, J.; Guo, T.-K.; Zhao, Z.-G.; Luo, T.; Zhang, M.-M.; Qian, K. Expression of cyclooxygenase-2 and vascular endothelial growth factor-C correlates with lymphangiogenesis and lymphatic invasion in human gastric cancer. Arch. Med Res. 2008, 39, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, Y.; Pan, K.-F.; Zhang, L.; Ma, J.-L.; Zhou, T.; Li, J.-Y.; Shen, L.; You, W.-C. Helicobacter pylori, cyclooxygenase-2 and evolution of gastric lesions: Results from an intervention trial in China. Carcinogenesis 2015, 36, 1572–1579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Gou, H.-F.; Chen, X.-C.; Zhu, J.; Jiang, M.; Yang, Y.; Cao, D.; Hou, M. Expressions of COX-2 and VEGF-C in gastric cancer: Correlations with lymphangiogenesis and prognostic implications. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 2011, 30, 14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Zhao, J.; Wen, S.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Z. Helicobacter pylori modulates cyclooxygenase-2 and 15-hydroxy prostaglandin dehydrogenase in gastric cancer. Oncol. Lett. 2017, 14, 5519–5525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Song, L.; Guo, Y.; Xu, B. Expressions of ras homolog gene family, member A (RhoA) and cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) proteins in early gastric cancer and their role in the development of gastric cancer. Med. Sci. Monit. Int. Med. J. Exp. Clin. Res. 2017, 23, 2979–2984. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  33. Wang, Y.; Wang, M. Prognostic significance of expression of cysteine-rich 61 and cyclooxygenase-2 in gastric cancer. BMC Gastroenterol. 2016, 16, 74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Jang, T.J. Expression of proteins related to prostaglandin E2 biosynthesis is increased in human gastric cancer and during gastric carcinogenesis. Virchows Arch. 2004, 445, 564–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Lim, H.Y.; Joo, H.J.; Choi, J.H.; Yi, J.W.; Yang, M.S.; Cho, D.Y.; Kim, H.S.; Nam, D.K.; Lee, K.B.; Kim, H.C. Increased expression of cyclooxygenase-2 protein in human gastric carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2000, 6, 519–525. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  36. Sung, J.J.Y.; Leung, W.K.; Go, M.Y.Y.; To, K.F.; Cheng, A.S.L.; Ng, E.K.W.; Chan, F.K.L. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in Helicobacter pylori-associated premalignant and malignant gastric lesions. Am. J. Pathol. 2000, 157, 729–735. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. McCarthy, C.J.; Crofford, L.J.; Greenson, J.; Scheiman, J.M. Cyclooxygenase-2 expression in gastric antral mucosa before and after eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 1999, 94, 1218–1223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ben Ayed-Guerfali, D.; Charfi, S.; Khabir, A.; Sellami-Boudawara, T.; Gargouri, A.; Mokdad-Gargouri, R. Clinical and prognosis relevance of COX-2 expression in Tunisian patients with primary gastric adenocarcinoma. Cancer Biomark. 2016, 17, 67–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Bhandari, P.; Bateman, A.C.; Mehta, R.L.; Patel, P. Mucosal expression of cyclooxygenase isoforms 1 and 2 is increased with worsening damage to the gastric mucosa. Histopathology 2005, 46, 280–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Mrena, J.; Wiksten, J.-P.; Kokkola, A.; Nordling, S.; Ristimäki, A.; Haglund, C. COX-2 is associated with proliferation and apoptosis markers and serves as an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer. Tumor Biol. 2010, 31, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Saukkonen, K.; Nieminen, O.; van Rees, B.; Vilkki, S.; Härkönen, M.; Juhola, M.; Mecklin, J.-P.; Sipponen, P.; Ristimäki, A. Expression of Cyclooxygenase-2 in Dysplasia of the Stomach and in Intestinal-type Gastric Adenocarcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res. 2001, 7, 1923–1931. [Google Scholar]
  42. Nardone, G.; Rocco, A.; Vaira, D.; Staibano, S.; Budillon, A.; Tatangelo, F.; Sciulli, M.G.; Perna, F.; Salvatore, G.; Di Benedetto, M.; et al. Expression of COX-2, mPGE-synthase1, MDR-1 (P-gp), and Bcl-xL: A molecular pathway of H. pylori-related gastric carcinogenesis. J. Pathol. 2004, 202, 305–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Hu, M.; Li, K.; Maskey, N.; Xu, Z.; Peng, C.; Tian, S.; Li, Y.; Yang, G. 15-PGDH expression as a predictive factor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2015, 8, 6910–6918. [Google Scholar]
  44. Liu, Z.; Wang, X.; Lu, Y.; Du, R.; Luo, G.; Wang, J.; Zhai, H.; Zhang, F.; Wen, Q.; Wu, K.; et al. 15-Hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase is a tumor suppressor of human gastric cancer. Cancer Biol. Ther. 2010, 10, 780–787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Jang, T.J.; Ji, Y.S.; Jung, K.H. Decreased expression of 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase in gastric carcinomas. Yonsei Med. J. 2008, 49, 917–922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Lou, L.-H.; Jing, D.-D.; Lai, Y.-X.; Lu, Y.-Y.; Li, J.-K.; Wu, K. 15-PGDH is reduced and induces apoptosis and cell cycle arrest in gastric carcinoma. World J. Gastroenterol. 2012, 18, 1028–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Seo, S.H.; Kang, M.S.; Kim, K.H.; An, M.S.; Ha, T.K.; Bae, K.B.; Oh, M.K.; Choi, C.S.; Oh, S.H.; Choi, Y.K. Correlation of 15-prostagladin dehydrogenase expression with clinicopathological factors and survival rate in gastric adenocarcinoma. Int. J. Surg. 2015, 13, 96–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  48. Thiel, A.; Ganesan, A.; Mrena, J.; Junnila, S.; Nykänen, A.; Hemmes, A.; Tai, H.-H.; Monni, O.; Kokkola, A.; Haglund, C.; et al. 15-Hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase is down-regulated in gastric cancer. Clin. Cancer Res. 2009, 15, 4572–4580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Tatsuwaki, H.; Tanigawa, T.; Watanabe, T.; Machida, H.; Okazaki, H.; Yamagami, H.; Shiba, M.; Watanabe, K.; Tominaga, K.; Fujiwara, Y.; et al. Reduction of 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase expression is an independent predictor of poor survival associated with enhanced cell proliferation in gastric adenocarcinoma. Cancer Sci. 2010, 101, 550–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Ryu, Y.-M.; Myung, S.-J.; Park, Y.S.; Yang, D.-H.; Song, H.J.; Jeong, J.-Y.; Lee, S.M.; Song, M.; Kim, D.H.; Lee, H.-J.; et al. Inhibition of 15-hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase by Helicobacter pylori in human gastric carcinogenesis. Cancer Prev. Res. 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  51. Nakanishi, T.; Tamai, I. Roles of Organic Anion Transporting Polypeptide 2A1 (OATP2A1/SLCO2A1) in Regulating the Pathophysiological Actions of Prostaglandins. AAPS J. 2018, 20, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Bujok, K.; Glaeser, H.; Schuh, W.; Rau, T.T.; Schmidt, I.; Fromm, M.F.; Mandery, K. Interplay between the prostaglandin transporter OATP2A1 and prostaglandin E2-mediated cellular effects. Cell. Signal. 2015, 27, 663–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Takeda, S.; Tanigawa, T.; Watanabe, T.; Tatsuwaki, H.; Nadatani, Y.; Otani, K.; Nagami, Y.; Tanaka, F.; Kamata, N.; Yamagami, H.; et al. Reduction of prostaglandin transporter predicts poor prognosis associated with angiogenesis in gastric adenocarcinoma. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. 2016, 31, 376–383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Nakanishi, T.; Ohno, Y.; Aotani, R.; Maruyama, S.; Shimada, H.; Kamo, S.; Oshima, H.; Oshima, M.; Schuetz, J.D.; Tamai, I. A novel role for OATP2A1/SLCO2A1 in a murine model of colon cancer. Sci. Rep. 2017, 7, 16567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Buxhofer-Ausch, V.; Secky, L.; Wlcek, K.; Svoboda, M.; Kounnis, V.; Briasoulis, E.; Tzakos, A.G.; Jaeger, W.; Thalhammer, T. Tumor-specific expression of organic anion-transporting polypeptides: Transporters as novel targets for cancer therapy. J. Drug Deliv. 2013, 2013, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Thakkar, N.; Lockhart, A.C.; Lee, W. Role of organic anion-transporting polypeptides (oatps) in cancer therapy. AAPS J. 2015, 17, 535–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  57. Aran, D.; Camarda, R.; Odegaard, J.; Paik, H.; Oskotsky, B.; Krings, G.; Goga, A.; Sirota, M.; Butte, A.J. Comprehensive analysis of normal adjacent to tumor transcriptomes. Nat. Commun. 2017, 8, 1077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Russi, S.; Calice, G.; Ruggieri, V.; Laurino, S.; La Rocca, F.; Amendola, E.; Lapadula, C.; Compare, D.; Nardone, G.; Musto, P.; et al. Gastric normal adjacent mucosa versus healthy and cancer tissues: Distinctive transcriptomic profiles and biological features. Cancers 2019, 11, 1248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  59. Areia, M.; Spaander, M.C.; Kuipers, E.J.; Dinis-Ribeiro, M. Endoscopic screening for gastric cancer: A cost-utility analysis for countries with an intermediate gastric cancer risk. United Eur. Gastroenterol. J. 2018, 6, 192–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Amin, M.B.; Edge, S.B.; Greene, F.L.; Byrd, D.R.; Brookland, R.K.; Washington, M.K.; Gershenwald, J.E.; Compton, C.C.; Hess, K.R.; Sullivan, D.C.; et al. AJCC Cancer Staging Manual; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; p. 1032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Livak, K.; Schmittgen, T. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2 (-Delta Delta (T)) Method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Ijms 21 07680 g001 550
Figure 1. mRNA expression of the prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) pathway in gastric cancer (GC). prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2) is upregulated in tumor samples compared to normal samples by a mean factor of 2.51, whereas hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase 15-(NAD) (HPGD) and solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2A1 (SLCO2A1) are downregulated in tumorous mucosa by a mean factor of 0.10 and 0.37, respectively. Lines represent median values of expression. **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 1. mRNA expression of the prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) pathway in gastric cancer (GC). prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2) is upregulated in tumor samples compared to normal samples by a mean factor of 2.51, whereas hydroxyprostaglandin dehydrogenase 15-(NAD) (HPGD) and solute carrier organic anion transporter family member 2A1 (SLCO2A1) are downregulated in tumorous mucosa by a mean factor of 0.10 and 0.37, respectively. Lines represent median values of expression. **** p < 0.0001.
Ijms 21 07680 g001
Ijms 21 07680 g002 550
Figure 2. mRNA expression according to localization. PTGS2 is upregulated in tumor samples by a mean factor of 2.68 and 2.40 in F + C and A, respectively. HPGD and SLCO2A1 genes are downregulated in tumor samples compared to “normal”-appearing mucosa samples by a mean factor of 0.15 and 0.28, 0.14, and 0.36, 0.10, and 0.36 in C + J, F + C, and A, respectively. Lines represent median values of expression. ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001. C + J: Cardia and gastroesophageal junction; F + C: Fundus and corpus; A: Antrum.
Figure 2. mRNA expression according to localization. PTGS2 is upregulated in tumor samples by a mean factor of 2.68 and 2.40 in F + C and A, respectively. HPGD and SLCO2A1 genes are downregulated in tumor samples compared to “normal”-appearing mucosa samples by a mean factor of 0.15 and 0.28, 0.14, and 0.36, 0.10, and 0.36 in C + J, F + C, and A, respectively. Lines represent median values of expression. ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001; **** p < 0.0001. C + J: Cardia and gastroesophageal junction; F + C: Fundus and corpus; A: Antrum.
Ijms 21 07680 g002
Ijms 21 07680 g003 550
Figure 3. mRNA expression according to gender. PTGS2 is upregulated in tumor samples by a mean factor of 2.64 in females and 2.05 in males, whereas HPGD and SLCO2A1 genes are downregulated compared to “normal”-appearing mucosa samples by a mean factor of 0.08 and 0.34 (females) and 0.12 and 0.41 (males), respectively. The ABCC4 gene is also downregulated by a mean factor of 0.71 in tumoral samples in females. Lines represent median values of expression. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; **** p < 0.0001.
Figure 3. mRNA expression according to gender. PTGS2 is upregulated in tumor samples by a mean factor of 2.64 in females and 2.05 in males, whereas HPGD and SLCO2A1 genes are downregulated compared to “normal”-appearing mucosa samples by a mean factor of 0.08 and 0.34 (females) and 0.12 and 0.41 (males), respectively. The ABCC4 gene is also downregulated by a mean factor of 0.71 in tumoral samples in females. Lines represent median values of expression. * p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; **** p < 0.0001.
Ijms 21 07680 g003
Ijms 21 07680 g004 550
Figure 4. Pearson’s correlation coefficient test. PTGS2 mRNA expression is negatively correlated with HPGD and SLCO2A1. On the other hand, there is a positive correlation between the expression of ABCC4, HPGD, and SLCO2A1. No significant correlation was found between PTGS2 expression and ABCC4. Values were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.
Figure 4. Pearson’s correlation coefficient test. PTGS2 mRNA expression is negatively correlated with HPGD and SLCO2A1. On the other hand, there is a positive correlation between the expression of ABCC4, HPGD, and SLCO2A1. No significant correlation was found between PTGS2 expression and ABCC4. Values were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.
Ijms 21 07680 g004
Table
Table 1. Description of the participants.
Table 1. Description of the participants.
Cases
Demographics (n = 121)
Age (years)
Mean ± sd69.49 ± 0.91
Median (min-max)70 (50–89)
Sex, n (%)
Male60 (50)
Female61 (50)
Tumor characteristics (n = 89)
Tumor location, n (%)
Cardia and GEJ7 (8)
Fundus and corpus18 (20)
Antrum and corpus-antrum transition53 (60)
Angularis incisura3 (3)
Others *8 (9)
Grade, n (%)
Well-differentiated 11 (13)
Moderately differentiated 56 (63)
Poorly differentiated19 (21)
Cannot be assessed3 (3)
Stage, n (%)
I-II44 (49)
III-IV45 (51)
Synchronous tumors, n (%)
Yes7 (8)
No82 (92)
* Including tumors that occupy more than one location and tumors of the gastric stump. For synchronous tumors, the most advanced lesion was considered in the characterization.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lopes, C.; Pereira, C.; Farinha, M.; Medeiros, R.; Dinis-Ribeiro, M. Prostaglandin E2 Pathway Is Dysregulated in Gastric Adenocarcinoma in a Caucasian Population. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 7680. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207680

AMA Style

Lopes C, Pereira C, Farinha M, Medeiros R, Dinis-Ribeiro M. Prostaglandin E2 Pathway Is Dysregulated in Gastric Adenocarcinoma in a Caucasian Population. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2020; 21(20):7680. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207680

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lopes, Catarina, Carina Pereira, Mónica Farinha, Rui Medeiros, and Mário Dinis-Ribeiro. 2020. "Prostaglandin E2 Pathway Is Dysregulated in Gastric Adenocarcinoma in a Caucasian Population" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 21, no. 20: 7680. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms21207680

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop