Next Article in Journal
Role of Cannabinoids in Obesity
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Sugarcane Catalase Gene ScCAT2 in the Defense Response to Pathogen Challenge and Adversity Stress
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Comparison between Brassica napus Genic Male Sterile Line and Restorer Line

1
National Key Laboratory of Crop Genetic Improvement, College of Plant Science and Technology, National Sub-Center of Rapeseed Improvement in Wuhan, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
2
Division of Biological Sciences, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO 65211, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19(9), 2689; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19092689
Submission received: 3 July 2018 / Revised: 30 August 2018 / Accepted: 4 September 2018 / Published: 10 September 2018
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Plant Sciences)

Abstract

:
DNA methylation is an essential epigenetic modification that dynamically regulates gene expression during plant development. However, few studies have determined the DNA methylation profiles of male-sterile rapeseed. Here, we conducted a global comparison of DNA methylation patterns between the rapeseed genic male sterile line 7365A and its near-isogenic fertile line 7365B by whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS). Profiling of the genome-wide DNA methylation showed that the methylation level in floral buds was lower than that in leaves and roots. Besides, a total of 410 differentially methylated region-associated genes (DMGs) were identified in 7365A relative to 7365B. Traditional bisulfite sequencing polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed to validate the WGBS data. Eleven DMGs were found to be involved in anther and pollen development, which were analyzed by quantitative PCR. In particular, Bnams4 was hypo-methylated in 7365A, and its expression was up-regulated, which might affect other DMGs and thus control the male sterility. This study provided genome-wide DNA methylation profiles of floral buds and important clues for revealing the molecular mechanism of genic male sterility in rapeseed.

1. Introduction

Oil rapeseed (Brassica napus L.; AnAnCnCn) is one of the most important sources of edible vegetable oils in the world. B. napus was derived from spontaneous allopolyploidization between the ancestors of Brassica oleracea (CoCo) and Brassica rapa (ArAr) about 7500 years ago [1]. In spite of the common ancestor, B. oleracea and B. rapa respectively contain 38.80% and 21.47% transposable elements (TEs) in the assembled genomes [2]. The above facts lead to the asymmetric distribution of TEs in the An and Cn subgenomes of assembled B. napus genome, which may lead to different methylation patterns between the two subgenomes [1].
Male sterility (MS) is important in crop breeding because it greatly facilitates the production of hybrid seeds and utilization of heterosis on a large scale [3]. MS exists widely in flowering plants since male reproductive development can be disturbed in various processes, including stamen specification, anther cell division or differentiation, microsporocyte meiosis, tetrad microspore release, microspore mitosis, pollen wall development, and anther dehiscence [4]. Numerous genes constitute a complex regulatory network of anther and pollen development [5]. Developmental reprogramming of DNA methylation can affect gene expression during plant sexual reproduction, and the RNA-directed DNA methylation (RdDM) pathway potentially regulates the development of many cell types and tissues [6]. Therefore, many studies have focused on DNA methylation in male reproductive development [7,8].
DNA methylation, an important epigenetic modification process in which methyl groups are transferred to the cytosines of DNA, can regulate gene expression without altering the DNA sequences. Plant DNA methylation occurs in all different sequence contexts including CG, CHG, and CHH (H represents either A, T, or G) [9]. DNA methylation is essential for normal plant development and is associated with several key processes including regulating gene expression, silencing/activating transposon, remodeling chromatin, and maintaining genome stability [10,11]. Generally, DNA methylation is inversely correlated with gene expression. However, the function of DNA methylation varies with the genomic targets [12]. The DNA methylation of regulatory elements such as promoters and enhancers potentially down-regulates gene expression by altering the chromatin structure and blocking transcription initiation. The DNA methylation of repeat sequences is also linked to silencing effects. Gene body methylation is not necessarily associated with the repression of gene expression, and instead exhibits extensive positive correlations with transcription activation. Besides, it may also play an important role in silencing repetitive elements and alternative splicing [12,13]. DNA methylation is subject to dynamic regulation in the response to developmental and environmental cues.
In plants, the methylation levels and patterns vary across species, tissues or organs, developmental status and the biotic and abiotic environment [14]. Whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) has emerged as a powerful approach for studying DNA methylation by providing genome-wide methylation profiles at single-base resolution [15]. Recently, WGBS has been widely applied to profiling the DNA methylation in many plants, such as Arabidopsis [16], rice [17], soybean [18], tomato [19], cotton [20] and cabbage [21]. It was also used to investigate the roles of DNA methylation in plant MS, especially since Ding et al. found that Psi–LDMAR reduced the expression of PMS3 through RdDM to regulate photoperiod-sensitive male sterility in rice [22]. Li et al. identified eight key differentially methylated genes that are possibly associated with cytoplasmic male-sterility (CMS) in soybean [23]. By comparing the DNA methylome of cabbage genic male sterile (GMS) 01-20S and its fertile line, Han et al. identified nine genes related to pollen development, among which Bol039180 might be involved in pectin degradation and pollen separation [21].
The rapeseed GMS line 9012A is a spontaneous mutant found in 1992 [24]. The genes governing male sterility in 7365A were revealed to be allelic to those in 9012A [25]. The 7365ABC three-line pollination control system provides an effective breeding strategy for the commercial rapeseed hybrids. In addition to the advantages such as stable sterility, wide distribution of restorer lines and almost no negative cytoplasmic effects, this system can produce a completely male sterile line by cross pollination between male sterile and temporary maintainer lines [26,27].
The male fertility of rapeseed 7365ABC is controlled by two independent loci: Bnams4a/Bnams4b/Bnams4c, a multiallelic locus on chromosome A07; and BnaMs3/Bnams3, which is located on chromosome C09. BnaMs3 has been characterized as a gain-of-function gene, and is required for tapetal development and function in lipid accumulation in tapetal plastids [28,29]. Bnams4b is a chimeric gene that is deleterious to tapetal plastids and leads to anther abortion. Bnams4a, a suppressor of Bnams4b, was speculated to block the transcription of Bnams4b by DNA methylation [30]. Several studies have been implemented to reveal the mechanism of this pollination control system [31,32]. Cytological, transcriptional and proteomic comparisons have revealed that 7365A mutant is defective in callose degradation, pollen-wall formation and the transition of the tapetum to the secretory type [31,32,33]. However, the roles of DNA methylation in the regulatory mechanism of rapeseed male sterility remain to be elucidated.
To investigate the profile of DNA methylation and possible function of cytosine methylation in rapeseed male sterility, we performed whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) of the floral buds in the male sterile line 7365A and its corresponding fertile line 7365B. The genome-wide DNA methylation in the floral buds of rapeseed was analyzed. Significantly lower methylation was observed for the An subgenome than for the Cn subgenome. Besides, a number of differentially methylated regions (DMRs) and genes related to pollen development were identified. In particular, Bnams4 was found to be hypo-methylated in the gene body, and its expression was up-regulated in the male sterile line. Our results provide significant insights into the genome-wide DNA methylation profiles of floral buds and important information for further studying the molecular mechanism of genic male sterility in rapeseed.

2. Results

2.1. Phenotypic Observation of 7365A and 7365B

The lines 7365A and 7365B displayed similar normal vegetative growth as well as female fertility, as indicated by the generation of full seeds under open pollination in the field for both lines. However, compared with 7365B, 7365A had smaller petals in the open flower (Figure 1a,b); unlike wild-type anthers with plenty of pollen, the anthers of 7365A were wizened without visible pollen grains (Figure 1c,d). The pistils of the two lines showed almost the same length, but the stamen length of 7365A was approximately half that of 7365B (Figure 1c,d). Furthermore, acetocarmine staining revealed that the 7365B anthers produced many viable round pollen grains, which were released from the anthers under gentle pressing and dyed in deep red. In contrast, the 7365A anthers contained a few lightly-dyed small pollen grains (Figure 1e,f). In brief, 7365A was completely male sterile.

2.2. Profiles of Genome-Wide DNA Methylation in 7365A and 7365B

To understand the possible function of cytosine methylation in rapeseed male sterility, young floral buds from male-sterile 7365A and male-fertile 7365B were collected for the construction of bisulfite-treated genomic DNA libraries. In total, whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) generated 230 million and 228 million raw reads from the two libraries by paired-end sequencing with Hiseq2500, respectively. Of the 225 million clean reads from the 7365B library, 69.41% (156 million) were uniquely mapped to the rapeseed reference genome of “Darmor-bzh” (http://www.genoscope.cns.fr/brassicanapus/data/), while of the 223 million clean reads from the 7365A library, 67.79% (151 million) were uniquely mapped to the rapeseed genome, exhibiting an average read depth of 41.63 and 40.15, respectively. More than 72% cytosines were covered by at least five reads in the rapeseed genome. The depth and density of the sequencing were sufficient for a high-quality genome-wide methylation analysis. Meanwhile, the bisulfite conversion efficiencies represented by the lambda DNA added into the libraries were over 99%, providing reliable and accurate results for the WGBS (Table 1).
As shown in Figure 2a, 7365B and 7365A showed no significant differences in average methylation levels in the whole genome and under each context. The genome-wide cytosine methylation levels under CG, CHG and CHH contexts were calculated. It is worth noting that among all the sequence contexts, CG had the highest methylation density, followed by CHG and CHH. Although a very low percentage of CHH was methylated, methylated cytosines in the CHH context accounted for a relatively large proportion of the total methylated cytosines (Figure 2b).
To present the global DNA methylation profiles of the two lines, we further analyzed the DNA methylation levels throughout the nineteen chromosomes in rapeseed floral buds under each context. The results showed that DNA methylation was unevenly distributed on the chromosomes (Figure 3a,b).
As the methylation level of the C01 to C09 chromosomes seemed to be obviously higher than that of the A01 to A10 chromosomes in both lines, we separately calculated the mean methylation levels of the An and Cn subgenomes. The Mann–Whitney-U-test showed that the mean methylation level of the An subgenome was significantly lower than that of the Cn subgenome under the CG, CHG and CHH contexts in both lines with p-value < 0.01 (Figure 3 and Figure S2).
To better understand the relationship between DNA methylation and gene expression, the genome was divided into several functional regions, namely promoter (2 kb region upstream of transcription start sites, TSSs), gene body (5′untranslated region, (UTR), exons, introns and 3′UTR), and repeat (transposons and other repetitive elements). We observed that the variation tendency of DNA methylation across different genomic regions was consistent between the two libraries under all methylation contexts (Figure 4 and Figure S6). The methylation level was the highest for the repeat compared with other methylated genomic regions, and that of the promoter greatly increased beyond the TSSs. The lowest methylation level was observed in the gene body, with a slightly higher methylation level for introns than for exons.

2.3. DNA Methylation Patterns of Genes

Although no significant changes were observed in the genome-wide methylation, there were several local differences (Figure S1). The differentially methylated regions (DMRs) between the two lines were profiled. In total, 779 DMRs were detected, including 136 hypermethylated and 643 hypomethylated DMRs in 7365A relative to 7365B (Table S2). We noticed that there were obviously more hypomethylated DMRs, implying that DNA hypomethylation may occur at the initial stage of anther abortion in 7365A.
Genes overlapping with DMRs for at least 1 bp in the functional region were defined as DMR-associated genes (DMGs). In total, we identified 410 DMGs, including 62 hypermethylated genes and 348 hypomethylated genes (Table S1). The number of hypomethylated genes was more than five times that of hypermethylated genes. The DMGs in the promoter were dominant, accounting for over 60% of the total DMGs (Figure 5).

2.4. Gene Ontology Ananlysis

Gene ontology (GO) analysis for the 410 DMGs was performed by using BGI Web Gene Ontology Annotation Plotting (WEGO 2.0, http://wego.genomics.org.cn/) and the results were categorized into three major groups (i.e., biological process, cellular component, and molecular function). The DMGs were annotated to be involved in catalytic activity, binding, cellular process, metabolic process, cell part, organelle, cell and other processes (Figure 6).

2.5. DMR-Associated Genes Related to Pollen Development

Among the 410 DMGs, eleven were identified to have possible functions in flower, anther and/or pollen development. As for the DMGs related to pollen development, three were hypermethylated, including one (BnaA07g24700D) in the promoter and two (BnaA09g28520D and BnaCnng55730D) in the intron; eight were hypomethylated, including four (BnaA06g05450D, BnaA08g08410D, BnaC01g33070D and BnaC04g12330D) in the promoter, one (BnaA03g36790D) in the intron, one (BnaA01g35050D) in the exon, and two (BnaC08g05510D and BnaCnng61870D) in the spanned regions.
As rapeseed has a close evolutionary relationship with the model plant Arabidopsis, all the DMGs were annotated according to their known homologous genes in A. thaliana. As a result, there were five DMGs encoding transcription factors, two of which belonged to CCCH zinc finger family: BnaCnng61870D was predicted to encode the RING/FYVE/PHD zinc finger superfamily protein and may be involved in pollen development. BnaA07g24700D, which is also named as Callose Defective Microspore1 (CDM1), plays a role in regulating callose metabolism around male meiocytes and the integrity of newly formed microspores. BnaC04g12330D, which was annotated as MYB101, is involved in pollen grain development. BnaC08g05510D encodes a pollen-expressed bZIP family transcription factor, and may be involved in regulating male gametophyte development. BnaA08g08410D belongs to the HD-ZIP IV family, and is highly expressed in mature pollen with unknown functions.
In addition, BnaA01g35050D, which encodes a CLAVATA1-related receptor kinase-like protein, is also known as Barely Any Meristem 3 (BAM3) and is involved in vascular strand development, control of leaf shape, size and symmetry, male gametophyte development and ovule specification. BnaA03g36790D is predicted to be a Tesmin/TSO1-like CXC domain-containing protein. BnaA09g28520D, a homolog of TETRAKETIDE a-PYRONE REDUCTASE2 (TKPR2), encodes a NAD(P)-binding Rossmann-fold superfamily protein that participates in the biosynthesis of sporopollenin. BnaC01g33070D encoding a sterol C-24 reductase cell elongation protein was annotated as DWARF1. BnaCnng55730D, which is homologous to GAMMA-TYPE CARBONIC ANHYDRASES 2, and is involved in anther dehiscence. BnaA06g05450D encodes pectinacetylesterase 1 and is considered to be a gene related to tapetum-specific male sterility, but its role in anther development remains unknown. Details for all the DMGs related to pollen development are listed in Table 2.

2.6. Validation of the WGBS Data by Traditional Bisulfite Sequencing

To validate the WGBS data, eight DMGs including five genes related to anther and pollen development were selected to carry out traditional bisulfite sequencing PCR. The bisulfite conversion rates represented by the percentage of unmethylated BnaIND.a-A3 were over 99% in 7365A and 7365B (Table S3). As shown in Figure 7, 7365A had more methylated cytosines in the DMRs of BnaA0724700D and BnaA09g28520D and less methylated cytosines in the DMRs of BnaA07g04210D and BnaA08g12350D (Figure 7, Figures S4-1 and S4-2). BnaC08g05510D, BnaC04g00960D, BnaA08g08410D and BnaC01g33070D were hypomethylated in 7365A (Figures S4-1 and S4-2). These results indicated that the traditional bisulfite sequencing results were in good accordance with WGBS data (Table 2, Figure 7, Figures S4-1 and S4-2).

2.7. Association between DNA Methylation and Gene Expression

Changes in methylation levels in genomic regions tend to be associated with the differential expression of genes. To analyze the expression of the eleven DMGs associated with pollen development, quantitative reverse transcription PCR (qRT-PCR) was carried out with samples from the young floral buds of 7365A and 7365B. As a result, except for BnaCnng55730D, ten other DMGs showed significantly different expression levels between the two lines: among which six (BnaA01g35050D, BnaA03g36790D, BnaA06g05450D, BnaC01g33070D, BnaC04g12330D and BnaCnng61870D) were down-regulated and four (BnaA07g24700D, BnaA08g08410D, BnaA09g28520D, and BnaC08g05510D) were up-regulated in 7365A (Figure 8).

2.8. Analysis of the DNA Methylation and Gene Expression of Bnams4

To evaluate the methylation level of Bnams4, the causal gene of male sterility in 7365A, the WGBS data were mapped to the insertional fragment where Bnams4 was located. As shown in the Integrative Genomics Viewer (Figure S5), Bnams4 was hypo-methylated in 7365A relative to 7365B, especially in the gene body region (Figure S5b). Traditional bisulfite sequencing validated the hypo-methylation in the male sterile line (Figure 7). qRT-PCR results indicated that the expression of Bnams4 was up-regulated in 7365A (Figure 8).

3. Discussion

DNA methylation plays an important regulatory role in plant development and male fertility. Whole genome DNA methylation profiling has been performed in photoperiod/thermo-sensitive male sterile rice [34], CMS soybean [23], and GMS cabbage [21], while no study has described the genome-wide methylation profile in GMS rapeseed. In the present study, global DNA methylation sequencing was for the first time performed on the floral buds of rapeseed GMS line 7365A and its near-isogenic line 7365B.
For all the sequences, the methylation density under the CG context was the highest, followed by that under the CHG and CHH contexts, which is consistent with two other reports on rapeseed [1,35]. The DNA methylation level varies among different tissues and organs. Compared with roots and leaves [1], the average methylation level was lower in young floral buds, especially under the CHH context (Figure S3). Li et al. determined the mean methylation level in cultured microspores under all three contexts [35], which was also lower than that in the roots and leaves. Considering the general role of DNA methylation in silencing genes, the lower methylation level indicated active gene expression in the reproductive organs.
It is worth noting that the mean methylation level of the An subgenome was significantly lower than that of the Cn subgenome under all contexts from both libraries. Chalhoub et al. observed that Cn genes presented 4% to 8% higher methylation than their homologous An genes from the methyl bisulfite sequencing of roots and leaves [1]. A similar result was obtained in cultured microspores by Li et al.: the amount of methylated cytosines distributed on the Cn subgenome was obviously larger than that distributed on the An subgenome [35]. It was hypothesized that the different DNA methylation levels between the An and Cn subgenomes can be attributed to the asymmetrical distribution of TE density in the genome of B. napus.
The tendency to variations in DNA methylation across genomic regions was consistent between the male sterile and fertile lines under all methylation contexts. The repeat showed the highest methylation level among the methylated genomic regions, which is in agreement with the role of DNA methylation in silencing repetitive elements to stabilize the genome. The gene body region showed the lowest methylation level, with slightly higher methylation for the intron than for the exon. The methylation level of the promoter greatly increased beyond the TSSs. No significant differences were observed in the comparison of the whole genome cytosines between 7365A and 7365B, indicating that DNA methylation is a relatively stable modification.
We identified a total of 779 DMRs and 410 DMGs, and found that more DMGs were hypomethylated. Recently, a similar tendency was observed in CMS soybean [23]. These results imply that DNA hypomethylation might occur at the initial stage of anther abortion.
There are complex relationships between DNA methylation and gene expression. Generally, DNA methylation in promoters is negatively associated with gene expression. However, we found that BnaA0724700D and BnaA08g08410D were up-regulated, although they exhibited opposite methylation patterns in their promoters. Except for the up-regulated BnaA08g08410D, three other genes (BnaA06g05450D, BnaC01g33070D and BnaC04g12330D) were down-regulated in 7365A, while all the four genes were hypomethylated in their promoters. It is possible that some other factors are involved in the regulation of these genes. Although BnaCnng55730 showed no differences in expression with hypomethylation in its intron, there could be a positive association between intron methylation and gene expression. BnaA03g36790D exhibited down-regulation when hypomethylated. On the contrary, BnaA09g28520D was up-regulated with hypermethylation in its intron.
Among the 11 DMGs possibly related to flower, anther and pollen development, several were involved in the pathways similar to those reported by previous studies of 7365A. BnaA07g24700D, which was up-regulated in 7365A, plays roles in regulating callose metabolism around male meiocytes and the integrity of newly formed microspores [36]. The synthesis and timely degradation of callose is crucial for the formation of functional microspores. Zhou et al. observed that callose could not be degraded in a timely manner in the Bnams3 mutant, and identified two β-1,3-glucanase genes (BnaA6 and BnaMSR66) that might be responsible for callose degradation [32]. It is possible that BnaA07g24700D plays a role in regulating the two β-1,3-glucanase genes. BnaA09g28520D is homologous to TETRAKETIDE a-PYRONE REDUCTASE2 (TKPR2). Coincidentally, in a proteomic comparison between the mutant 7365A and wild-type 7365B, Qin et al. characterized three down-regulated proteins including BnaTKPR1, which forms heterodimer with TKPR2 to participate in sporopollenin biosynthesis in the tapetum [31,37]. BnaA06g05450D was predicted to encode pectinacetylesterase 1, which is characterized as a tapetum-specific gene related to male sterility, but its role in anther development remains unclear [38]. Zhu et al. also discovered the unsuccessful separation of tapetum cells and pollen mother cells (PMCs) in 7365A because of the significantly decreased expression of the pectin methylesterase gene [33]. Further research is needed to clarify whether BnaA06g05450D also functions in the degradation of specialized cell wall layers surrounding tapetum cells and PMCs. These consistent results indicate the feasibility of applying WGBS to the identification of male sterility-related genes.
In addition, BnaC04g12330D was predicted to be MYB101, which functions together with MYB97 and MYB120 in pollen tube–synergid interaction [39]. BnaC08g05510D is homologous to a pollen-expressed bZIP transcription factor, which is highly expressed in the tapetum and microspores, but with unknown functions [40,41]. BnaA08g08410D was predicted to be the HD-ZIP IV family-homeodomain GLABROUS 4 (HDG4), which is highly expressed in mature pollen without confirmed functions [40]. BnaA01g35050D is annotated as BAM3 in Arabidopsis. BAM1, BAM2 and BAM3 are CLAVATA1-related receptor kinase-like proteins, and the former two are important regulators of early anther development in Arabidopsis [42,43]. BAM3 is possibly involved in male gametophyte development. BnaA03g36790D is homologous to TSO1, which plays a role in the development of both male and female reproductive tissues, and the tso1 mutant produced very little pollen [44]. BnaC01g33070D is annotated as DWARF1, which is involved in the conversion of brassinosteroid precursor 24-methylenecholesterol to campesterol, and the dwarf1 mutant displayed slightly delayed flowering and reduced fertility [45]. BnaCnng61870D was predicted to encode a RING/FYVE/PHD zinc finger superfamily protein, which may participate in pollen development [40]. Further studies are required to investigate the roles of these genes in the male sterility of 7365A.
In the present study, Bnams4, the causal gene of male sterility, was found to be hypo-methylated in its gene body region under all contexts and its expression was up-regulated in 7365A. A previous study has shown the hypo-methylation of the upstream region of Bnams4 under the CHG context, and up-regulated expression in the male sterile line, although the hypo-methylated region is relatively far away (1.4 kb) from the TSS of Bnams4 [30]. Whether the hypo-methylation of Bnams4 affects the status of other genes and thus controls male sterility remains to be elucidated.

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Materials, Phenotypic Observation and Sample Collection

The lines 7365A (male sterile; Bnams3ms3 ms4bms4b) and 7365B (male fertile; Bnams3ms3 ms4ams4b) were homozygous recessive at the Bnams3 locus and separated at the Bnams4 locus [27]. Since they had been cross-pollinated by full sib-mating for more than 10 generations, they were considered as near-isogenic lines (NILs).
The lines 7365A and 7365B were grown in the same research field of Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China. After anthesis, the male sterile and fertile lines could be easily distinguished from each other according to the significant phenotypic differences in the sizes of their flowers and the fertility of the anthers. The blooming flowers were photographed using a Canon EOS 70D camera. The anthers were separated from floral buds ready to bloom and then gently pressed before staining by acetocarmine, and then photographed using a Nikon 80i optical microscope. Young floral buds 1–2 mm in length (pollen mother cell stage to microspore release from the tetrad) were collected from five plants for each line at the same time. The collected buds were immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and then stored at –80 °C before DNA and RNA extraction.

4.2. Library Construction and Bisulfite Sequencing

Samples were crushed in liquid nitrogen. The total genomic DNA was extracted by Hi-DNA secure Plant Kit (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Genomic DNA degradation and contamination were monitored on agarose gels. DNA purity was checked with the NanoPhotometer® spectrophotometer (Implen, Westlake Village, CA, USA). DNA concentration was measured with Qubit® DNA Assay Kit in Qubit® 2.0 Fluorometer (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA).
A total amount of 5.2 μg genomic DNA spiked with 26 ng lambda DNA was fragmented by sonication to 200–300 bp by Covaris S220 (Covaris, Woburn, MA, USA), followed by end repair and adenylation. Cytosine-methylated barcodes were ligated to sonicated DNA according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Then DNA fragments were treated twice using bisulfite with EZ DNA Methylation-GoldTM Kit (Zymo Research, Orange, CA, USA). The resulting single-strand DNA fragments were amplified with KAPA HiFi HotStart Uracil + ReadyMix (2×). Library concentration was quantified by Qubit® 2.0 Fluorometer (Life Technologies, Carlsbad, CA, USA) and quantitative PCR, and the insert size was assayed on Agilent Bioanalyzer 2100 system (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The qualified libraries were sequenced on an Illumina Hiseq2500 platform and 125-bp paired-end reads were generated by Novogene Bioinformatics Institute (Beijing, China).

4.3. Quality Control

Read sequences produced by the Illumina pipeline in FASTQ format were pre-processed through Trimmomatic (version 0.35) as follows: firstly, as a subset of reads might contain adapter oligonucleotide sequences, the reads containing adapter sequences were filtered out; secondly, since some reads had N (ambiguous bases) in their sequences, any reads with more than 10% N were removed; thirdly, reads with more than 50% low quality bases (PHRED score ≤ 20) were exclude. At the same time, Q20, Q30 and GC content of the data were calculated. The remaining reads that passed all the above filtering steps were counted as clean reads and used for subsequent analyses.

4.4. Mapping of the Reads to the Reference Genome

Bismark software (version 0.12.5; Krueger F, 2011) was used for the alignments of bisulfite-treated reads to a reference genome with default parameters. The reference genome was firstly transformed to a bisulfite-converted version (C-to-T and G-to-A conversion) and then indexed by Bowtie2 (version 2.2.5). Sequence reads were also transformed into fully bisulfite-converted versions (C-to-T and G-to-A conversion) before aligning to similarly converted versions of the genome in a directional manner. Sequence reads that produce a unique best alignment from the two alignment processes (original top and bottom strand) were then compared with the normal genomic sequences and the methylation states of all cytosine positions in the read were inferred. Read pairs that shared the same coordinates in the genome were regarded as duplicated, and were removed before methylation state determination to avoid potential calculation bias of the methylation level. The bisulfite non-conversion rate was calculated as the percentage of sequenced cytosines to reference cytosines in the lambda genome.

4.5. Differentially Methylated Region (DMR) Analysis

Differentially methylated regions (DMRs) were identified by the swDMR software (https://sourceforge.net/projects/swdmr/) with read coverage ≥ 5, the difference of methylation level ≥ 0.1 or fold change ≥ 2, and with corrected p-value < 0.01, using a sliding-window approach. The window was set to 1000 bp and the step length was 100 bp. The Fisher test was implemented to detect the DMRs. Genes overlapping with significant DMRs for at least 1 bp in the functional region were defined as DMR-associated genes (DMGs).

4.6. Gene Ontology Analysis of DMR-Associated Genes

Gene ontology (GO) analysis of the DMGs was performed by the GOseq R package, in which gene length bias was corrected. GO terms with corrected p-values lower than 0.05 were considered as significantly enriched by DMGs. All the DMGs were annotated by BGI Web Gene Ontology Annotation Plotting (http://wego.genomics.org.cn/).

4.7. Data Validation by Traditional Bisulfite Sequencing PCR

Traditional bisulfite sequencing PCR was used to validate the WGBS data. One microgram genomic DNA was treated for sodium bisulfite conversion according to the protocol of Qiagen EpiTect Bisulfite kit (Cat. No. 59104). The treated DNA was then purified by the Qiagen PCR purification kit (Cat. No. 28106) before being used as bisulfate sequencing PCR (BS-PCR) templates. Primers were designed on Kismeth (http://katahdin.mssm.edu/kismeth/primer_design.pl). BS-PCR was performed with 2× Taq Master Mix (Vazyme Biotech, Nanjing, China). The amplicons were cloned into pMD18-T (Takara Biotechnology, Dalian, China). Then, 10–14 positive clones for each PCR product were sequenced by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China) Co. Ltd. The sequencing results were trimmed to remove the vector and primer sequences by the Seqman program of DNAstar software before being analyzed on the Kismeth website [46]. The BnaIND.a-A3 [47] was used to confirm bisulfite conversion efficiency.

4.8. First-Strand cDNA Synthesis and Quantitative Real-Time PCR

Total RNA was extracted from the same plants used for WGBS and purified by RNA prep pure Plant Kit (Tiangen Biotech, Beijing, China). One microgram of total RNA was reverse-transcribed according to the protocol of the Revert Aid First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and the cDNA was used as the template for the following amplification. The quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) was conducted on a CFX96 Realtime system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) using the SYBR Green Real-time PCR Master Mix (Toyobo, Osaka, Japan) with gene-specific primers (Table S4). Each reaction was performed with four replicates by using BnaActin3 as internal control. The relative level of gene expression was evaluated by the 2−ΔΔCT method [48]. The gene expression levels in 7365B were used to normalize the relative expression. Student’s t-test was adopted to measure the differences in the relative expression of genes between 7365A and 7365B.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary materials can be found at https://www.mdpi.com/1422-0067/19/9/2689/s1. Figure S1: Circle plot of global DNA methylation level differences between 7365A and 7365B; Figure S2: DNA methylation levels under three contexts in nineteen chromosomes; Figure S3: Different methylation level in roots, leaves and flowers; Figures S4-1 and S4-2: DNA methylation at specific sites of three DMGs by traditional bisulfite sequencing; Figure S5: Integrative Genomics Viewer screen capture of Bnams4 methylation level. Figure S6: Average density of DNA methylation in different genomic functional regions; Table S1: Information of total methylated genomic region (DMR)-associated genes (DMGs); Table S2: Information of total methylated genomic regions (DMRs); Table S3: Bisulfite conversion efficiency represented by BnaIND.a-A3 unmethylated rate; Table S4: Primers used in this study. The raw data have been uploaded to NCBI under the accession number SRR7763971 (7365A) and SRR7763972 (7365B).

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.W. (Zhixin Wang); Formal analysis, Z.W. (Zengxiang Wu) and H.A.; Investigation, Z.W. (Zhixin Wang) and X.W.; Methodology, Z.W. (Zhixin Wang) and X.W.; Resources, J.T.; Supervision, B.Y., J.W., C.M., J.S., T.F. and J.T.; Visualization, Z.W. (Zhixin Wang); Writing—original draft, Z.W. (Zhixin Wang); Writing—review & editing, J.T.

Funding

This research was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0100305] and the National Natural Science Foundation of China [31871657].

Acknowledgments

We thank Grady Gong and the four anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions to improve our paper.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

BAMBarely any meristem
BS-PCRBisulfite sequencing polymerase chain reaction
MSMale sterility
CMSCytoplasmic male sterility
GMSGenic male sterility
CDM 1Callose defective microspore 1
DMGDifferentially methylated region associated gene
DMRDifferentially methylated region
GOGene ontology
HDG4HD-ZIP IV family-homeodomain GLABROUS 4
NILNear-isogenic line
PMCPollen mother cell
RdDMRNA-directed DNA methylation
TETransposable element
TKPR2TETRAKETIDE a-PYRONE REDUCTASE2
TSSTranscription start site
WGBSWhole-genome bisulfite sequencing

References

  1. Chalhoub, B.; Denoeud, F.; Liu, S.; Parkin, I.A.; Tang, H.; Wang, X.; Chiquet, J.; Belcram, H.; Tong, C.; Samans, B.; et al. Early allopolyploid evolution in the post-Neolithic Brassica napus oilseed genome. Science 2014, 345, 950–953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, X.; Wang, H.; Wang, J.; Sun, R.; Wu, J.; Liu, S.; Bai, Y.; Mun, J.H.; Bancroft, I.; Cheng, F.; et al. The genome of the mesopolyploid crop species Brassica rapa. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43, 1035–1039. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Saxena, K.; Hingane, A.J. Male sterility systems in major field crops and their potential role in crop improvement. In Plant Biology and Biotechnology; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2015; pp. 639–656. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ma, H. Molecular genetic analyses of microsporogenesis and microgametogenesis in flowering plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2005, 56, 393–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Gomez, J.F.; Talle, B.; Wilson, Z.A. Anther and pollen development: A conserved developmental pathway. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2015, 57, 876–891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Tamiru, M.; Hardcastle, T.J.; Lewsey, M.G. Regulation of genome-wide DNA methylation by mobile small RNAs. New Phytol. 2018, 217, 540–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Jullien, P.E.; Susaki, D.; Yelagandula, R.; Higashiyama, T.; Berger, F. DNA methylation dynamics during sexual reproduction in Arabidopsis thaliana. Curr. Biol. 2012, 22, 1825–1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Walker, J.; Gao, H.; Zhang, J.; Aldridge, B.; Vickers, M.; Higgins, J.D.; Feng, X. Sexual-lineage-specific DNA methylation regulates meiosis in Arabidopsis. Nat. Genet. 2018, 50, 130–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Chan, S.W.; Henderson, I.R.; Jacobsen, S.E. Gardening the genome: DNA methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2005, 6, 351–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Kim, M.Y.; Zilberman, D. DNA methylation as a system of plant genomic immunity. Trends Plant Sci. 2014, 19, 320–326. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Niederhuth, C.E.; Schmitz, R.J. Putting DNA methylation in context: From genomes to gene expression in plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2017, 1860, 149–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Jones, P.A. Functions of DNA methylation: Islands, start sites, gene bodies and beyond. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2012, 13, 484–492. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Bewick, A.J.; Schmitz, R.J. Gene body DNA methylation in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2017, 36, 103–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Zhang, H.; Lang, Z.; Zhu, J.K. Dynamics and function of DNA methylation in plants. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018, 19, 489–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Plongthongkum, N.; Diep, D.H.; Zhang, K. Advances in the profiling of DNA modifications: Cytosine methylation and beyond. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2014, 15, 647–661. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Cokus, S.J.; Feng, S.; Zhang, X.; Chen, Z.; Merriman, B.; Haudenschild, C.D.; Pradhan, S.; Nelson, S.F.; Pellegrini, M.; Jacobsen, S.E. Shotgun bisulphite sequencing of the Arabidopsis genome reveals DNA methylation patterning. Nature 2008, 452, 215–219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Liu, H.; Wu, Y.; Cao, A.; Mao, B.; Zhao, B.; Wang, J. Genome-Wide Analysis of DNA Methylation During Ovule Development of Female-Sterile Rice fsv1. G3 2017, 7, 3621–3635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Song, Q.X.; Lu, X.; Li, Q.T.; Chen, H.; Hu, X.Y.; Ma, B.; Zhang, W.K.; Chen, S.Y.; Zhang, J.S. Genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation in soybean. Mol. Plant 2013, 6, 1961–1974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Zuo, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhu, B.; Luo, Y.; Wang, Q.; Gao, L. Comparative Analysis of DNA Methylation Reveals Specific Regulations on Ethylene Pathway in Tomato Fruit. Genes 2018, 9, 266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ma, Y.; Min, L.; Wang, M.; Wang, C.; Zhao, Y.; Li, Y.; Fang, Q.; Wu, Y.; Ding, Y.; Su, X. Disrupted Genome Methylation in Response to High Temperature Has Distinct Affects on Microspore Abortion and Anther Indehiscence. Plant Cell 2018, tpc-00074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Han, F.; Zhang, X.; Liu, X.; Su, H.; Kong, C.; Fang, Z.; Yang, L.; Zhuang, M.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, Y.; et al. Comparative Analysis of Genome Wide DNA Methylation Profiles for the Genic Male Sterile Cabbage Line 01-20S and Its Maintainer Line. Genes 2017, 8, 159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Ding, J.; Shen, J.; Mao, H.; Xie, W.; Li, X.; Zhang, Q. RNA-directed DNA methylation is involved in regulating photoperiod-sensitive male sterility in rice. Mol. Plant 2012, 5, 1210–1216. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Li, Y.; Ding, X.; Wang, X.; He, T.; Zhang, H.; Yang, L.; Wang, T.; Chen, L.; Gai, J.; Yang, S. Genome-wide comparative analysis of DNA methylation between soybean cytoplasmic male-sterile line NJCMS5A and its maintainer NJCMS5B. BMC Genom. 2017, 18, 596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Chen, F.X.; Hu, B.C.; Li, Q.S. Discovery and Study of Genic Male Sterility (GMS) Material 9012A in Brassica napus L. Acta Agric. Univ. Pekinensis 1993, 19, 57–61. [Google Scholar]
  25. Xiao, L.; Yi, B.; Chen, Y.F.; Huang, Z.; Chen, W.; Ma, C.Z.; Tu, J.X.; Fu, T.D. Molecular markers linked to Bn;rf: A recessive epistatic inhibitor gene of recessive genic male sterility in Brassica napus L. Euphytica 2008, 164, 377–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Stiewe, G.; Pleines, S.; Coque, M.; Gielen, J. New Hybrid System for Brassica napus. U.S. Patent Application No. 12/600,481, 2 September 2010. [Google Scholar]
  27. Xia, S.; Cheng, L.; Zu, F.; Dun, X.; Zhou, Z.; Yi, B.; Wen, J.; Ma, C.; Shen, J.; Tu, J.; et al. Mapping of BnMs4 and BnRf to a common microsyntenic region of Arabidopsis thaliana chromosome 3 using intron polymorphism markers. Theor. Appl. Genet. 2012, 124, 1193–1200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Dun, X.; Zhou, Z.; Xia, S.; Wen, J.; Yi, B.; Shen, J.; Ma, C.; Tu, J.; Fu, T. BnaC.Tic40, a plastid inner membrane translocon originating from Brassica oleracea, is essential for tapetal function and microspore development in Brassica napus. Plant J. 2011, 68, 532–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Dun, X.; Shen, W.; Hu, K.; Zhou, Z.; Xia, S.; Wen, J.; Yi, B.; Shen, J.; Ma, C.; Tu, J.; et al. Neofunctionalization of duplicated Tic40 genes caused a gain-of-function variation related to male fertility in Brassica oleracea lineages. Plant Physiol. 2014, 166, 1403–1419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Xia, S.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, H.; Hu, K.; Zhang, Z.; Qin, M.; Dun, X.; Yi, B.; Wen, J.; Ma, C.; et al. Altered Transcription and Neofunctionalization of Duplicated Genes Rescue the Harmful Effects of a Chimeric Gene in Brassica napus. Plant Cell 2016, 28, 2060–2078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Qin, M.; Tian, T.; Xia, S.; Wang, Z.; Song, L.; Yi, B.; Wen, J.; Shen, J.; Ma, C.; Fu, T.; et al. Heterodimer Formation of BnPKSA or BnPKSB with BnACOS5 Constitutes a Multienzyme Complex in Tapetal Cells and is Involved in Male Reproductive Development in Brassica napus. Plant Cell Physiol. 2016, 57, 1643–1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Zhou, Z.; Dun, X.; Xia, S.; Shi, D.; Qin, M.; Yi, B.; Wen, J.; Shen, J.; Ma, C.; Tu, J.; et al. BnMs3 is required for tapetal differentiation and degradation, microspore separation, and pollen-wall biosynthesis in Brassica napus. J. Exp. Bot. 2012, 63, 2041–2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Zhu, Y.; Dun, X.; Zhou, Z.; Xia, S.; Yi, B.; Wen, J.; Shen, J.; Ma, C.; Tu, J.; Fu, T. A separation defect of tapetum cells and microspore mother cells results in male sterility in Brassica napus: The role of abscisic acid in early anther development. Plant Mol. Biol. 2010, 72, 111–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Hu, J.H.; Chen, X.J.; Zhang, H.Y.; Ding, Y. Genome-wide analysis of DNA methylation in photoperiod- and thermo-sensitive male sterile rice Peiai 64S. BMC Genom. 2015, 16, 102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Li, J.; Huang, Q.; Sun, M.; Zhang, T.; Li, H.; Chen, B.; Xu, K.; Gao, G.; Li, F.; Yan, G.; et al. Global DNA methylation variations after short-term heat shock treatment in cultured microspores of Brassica napus cv. Topas. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 38401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Lu, P.; Chai, M.; Yang, J.; Ning, G.; Wang, G.; Ma, H. The Arabidopsis CALLOSE DEFECTIVE MICROSPORE1 gene is required for male fertility through regulating callose metabolism during microsporogenesis. Plant Physiol. 2014, 164, 1893–1904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Grienenberger, E.; Kim, S.S.; Lallemand, B.; Geoffroy, P.; Heintz, D.; Souza Cde, A.; Heitz, T.; Douglas, C.J.; Legrand, M. Analysis of TETRAKETIDE alpha-PYRONE REDUCTASE function in Arabidopsis thaliana reveals a previously unknown, but conserved, biochemical pathway in sporopollenin monomer biosynthesis. Plant Cell 2010, 22, 4067–4083. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ma, Y.; Kang, J.; Wu, J.; Zhu, Y.; Wang, X. Identification of tapetum-specific genes by comparing global gene expression of four different male sterile lines in Brassica oleracea. Plant Mol. Biol. 2015, 87, 541–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Liang, Y.; Tan, Z.M.; Zhu, L.; Niu, Q.K.; Zhou, J.J.; Li, M.; Chen, L.Q.; Zhang, X.Q.; Ye, D. MYB97, MYB101 and MYB120 function as male factors that control pollen tube-synergid interaction in Arabidopsis thaliana fertilization. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9, e1003933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Renak, D.; Dupl’akova, N.; Honys, D. Wide-scale screening of T-DNA lines for transcription factor genes affecting male gametophyte development in Arabidopsis. Sex. Plant Reprod. 2012, 25, 39–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Alves-Ferreira, M.; Wellmer, F.; Banhara, A.; Kumar, V.; Riechmann, J.L.; Meyerowitz, E.M. Global expression profiling applied to the analysis of Arabidopsis stamen development. Plant Physiol. 2007, 145, 747–762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Hord, C.L.; Chen, C.; Deyoung, B.J.; Clark, S.E.; Ma, H. The BAM1/BAM2 receptor-like kinases are important regulators of Arabidopsis early anther development. Plant Cell 2006, 18, 1667–1680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. DeYoung, B.J.; Bickle, K.L.; Schrage, K.J.; Muskett, P.; Patel, K.; Clark, S.E. The CLAVATA1-related BAM1, BAM2 and BAM3 receptor kinase-like proteins are required for meristem function in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2006, 45, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Andersen, S.U.; Algreen-Petersen, R.G.; Hoedl, M.; Jurkiewicz, A.; Cvitanich, C.; Braunschweig, U.; Schauser, L.; Oh, S.A.; Twell, D.; Jensen, E.O. The conserved cysteine-rich domain of a tesmin/TSO1-like protein binds zinc in vitro and TSO1 is required for both male and female fertility in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58, 3657–3670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Klahre, U.; Noguchi, T.; Fujioka, S.; Takatsuto, S.; Yokota, T.; Nomura, T.; Yoshida, S.; Chua, N.H. The Arabidopsis DIMINUTO/DWARF1 gene encodes a protein involved in steroid synthesis. Plant Cell 1998, 10, 1677–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Gruntman, E.; Qi, Y.; Slotkin, R.K.; Roeder, T.; Martienssen, R.A.; Sachidanandam, R. Kismeth: Analyzer of plant methylation states through bisulfite sequencing. BMC Bioinform. 2008, 9, 371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Wang, J.; Wang, C.; Long, Y.; Hopkins, C.; Kurup, S.; Liu, K.; King, G.J.; Meng, J. Universal endogenous gene controls for bisulphite conversion in analysis of plant DNA methylation. Plant Methods 2011, 7, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Livak, K.J.; Schmittgen, T.D. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods 2001, 25, 402–408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Phenotypic characterization of fertile and sterile lines. (a,b) Vertical-view of open flowers; (c,d) Side-view of flowers without calyxes and petals; (e,f) Acetocarmine-stained anthers; a, c and e are 7365B; b, d and f are 7365A. The scale bars are 5 mm for a, b, c and d, and 100 μm for e and f.
Figure 1. Phenotypic characterization of fertile and sterile lines. (a,b) Vertical-view of open flowers; (c,d) Side-view of flowers without calyxes and petals; (e,f) Acetocarmine-stained anthers; a, c and e are 7365B; b, d and f are 7365A. The scale bars are 5 mm for a, b, c and d, and 100 μm for e and f.
Ijms 19 02689 g001
Figure 2. Genome-wide DNA methylation patterns of 7365A and 7365B. (a) Average methylation levels of CG, CHG and CHH in the whole genome; (b) Percentages of methylated cytosines under each context.
Figure 2. Genome-wide DNA methylation patterns of 7365A and 7365B. (a) Average methylation levels of CG, CHG and CHH in the whole genome; (b) Percentages of methylated cytosines under each context.
Ijms 19 02689 g002
Figure 3. Chromosomal distribution of the global DNA methylation patterns of 7365A and 7365B. (a) DNA methylation levels in nineteen chromosomes. (b) Mean DNA methylation levels of the An and Cn subgenomes.
Figure 3. Chromosomal distribution of the global DNA methylation patterns of 7365A and 7365B. (a) DNA methylation levels in nineteen chromosomes. (b) Mean DNA methylation levels of the An and Cn subgenomes.
Ijms 19 02689 g003
Figure 4. Average density of DNA methylation in different genomic functional regions in 7365A and 7365B. Each functional region was equally divided into 20 bins, and the mean density of the methylated cytosines was defined as the methylation density in each bin.
Figure 4. Average density of DNA methylation in different genomic functional regions in 7365A and 7365B. Each functional region was equally divided into 20 bins, and the mean density of the methylated cytosines was defined as the methylation density in each bin.
Ijms 19 02689 g004
Figure 5. Number of hypomethylated and hypermethylated DMGs in gene functional regions. Hypo: hypomethylated; hyper: hypermethylated.
Figure 5. Number of hypomethylated and hypermethylated DMGs in gene functional regions. Hypo: hypomethylated; hyper: hypermethylated.
Ijms 19 02689 g005
Figure 6. GO analysis of all DMGs. Hypo: hypomethylated; hyper: hypermethylated.
Figure 6. GO analysis of all DMGs. Hypo: hypomethylated; hyper: hypermethylated.
Ijms 19 02689 g006
Figure 7. DNA methylation at specific sites of two DMGs and Bnams4 by traditional bisulfite sequencing. (a) Bisulfite PCR results in 7165A; (b) Bisulfite PCR results in 7365B. The vertical axis represents the percentage of methylated sites; the horizontal axis represents the position of cytosine in the DMRs; hypo and hyper represents hypo-methylated and hyper-methylated DMR in 7365A. (c) WGBS results of the corresponding DMR.
Figure 7. DNA methylation at specific sites of two DMGs and Bnams4 by traditional bisulfite sequencing. (a) Bisulfite PCR results in 7165A; (b) Bisulfite PCR results in 7365B. The vertical axis represents the percentage of methylated sites; the horizontal axis represents the position of cytosine in the DMRs; hypo and hyper represents hypo-methylated and hyper-methylated DMR in 7365A. (c) WGBS results of the corresponding DMR.
Ijms 19 02689 g007
Figure 8. Expression analysis of pollen development-related DMGs and Bnams4. The asterisk indicates a significant difference between 7365A and 7365B (*: p-value < 0.05, **: p-value < 0.01). The Gene ID highlighted in yellow and blue on the vertical axis represents hyper-methylated and hypo-methylated DMRs.
Figure 8. Expression analysis of pollen development-related DMGs and Bnams4. The asterisk indicates a significant difference between 7365A and 7365B (*: p-value < 0.05, **: p-value < 0.01). The Gene ID highlighted in yellow and blue on the vertical axis represents hyper-methylated and hypo-methylated DMRs.
Ijms 19 02689 g008
Table 1. Summary of genome-wide methylation sequencing data.
Table 1. Summary of genome-wide methylation sequencing data.
SampleRaw ReadsClean ReadsUniquely Mapped ReadsUniquely Mapped Rate (%)Mean CoverageCoverage of 5× Depths (%)Conversion Rate (%)
7365A228 million223 million151 million67.7940.1572.2599.901
7365B230 million225 million156 million69.4141.6373.0999.897
Table 2. Information of eleven DMR-associated genes involved in pollen development.
Table 2. Information of eleven DMR-associated genes involved in pollen development.
Differentially Methylated GeneGene RegionHyper/HypoExpressionp-ValueHomolog in ArabidopsisE-ValuePredicted Functional Description
BnaA01g35050DexonHypoDown1.21 × 10−49AT4G202700Leucine-rich receptor-like protein kinase family protein (BAM3)
BnaA03g36790DintronHypoDown0.007581AT3G227800Tesmin/TSO1-like CXC domain-containing protein
BnaA06g05450DpromoterHypoDown3.77 × 10−52AT1G095502.00 × 10−143Pectinacetylesterase family protein
BnaA07g24700DpromoterHyperUp0.032969AT1G682001.00 × 10−49Zinc finger C-x8-C-x5-C-x3-H type family protein (CDM1)
BnaA08g08410DpromoterHypoUp3.14 × 10−21AT4G177100homeodomain GLABROUS 4 (HDG4)
BnaA09g28520DintronHyperUp0.000011AT1G685401.00 × 10−113NAD(P)-binding Rossmann-fold superfamily protein (TKPR2)
BnaC01g33070DpromoterHypoDown9.94 × 10−6AT3G198200cell elongation protein/DWARF1/DIMINUTO
BnaC04g12330DpromoterHypoDown1.93 × 10−7AT2G324600MYB domain protein 101 (MYB101)
BnaC08g05510Dexon, intron, utr3HypoUp6.34 × 10−23AT1G354906.34 × 10−23bZIP family transcription factor
BnaCnng55730DintronHypoUnchanged3.58 × 10−68AT1G472600Gamma carbonic anhydrase 2
BnaCnng61870Dexon, intron, utr5, promoterHypoDown4.22 × 10−25AT2G379501.00 × 10−163RING/FYVE/PHD zinc finger superfamily protein
Hyper: hypermethylation; hypo: hypomethylation. down: down-regulated expression in 7365A. up: up-regulated expression.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Z.; Wu, X.; Wu, Z.; An, H.; Yi, B.; Wen, J.; Ma, C.; Shen, J.; Fu, T.; Tu, J. Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Comparison between Brassica napus Genic Male Sterile Line and Restorer Line. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19, 2689. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19092689

AMA Style

Wang Z, Wu X, Wu Z, An H, Yi B, Wen J, Ma C, Shen J, Fu T, Tu J. Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Comparison between Brassica napus Genic Male Sterile Line and Restorer Line. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. 2018; 19(9):2689. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19092689

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Zhixin, Xiangping Wu, Zengxiang Wu, Hong An, Bin Yi, Jing Wen, Chaozhi Ma, Jinxiong Shen, Tingdong Fu, and Jinxing Tu. 2018. "Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Comparison between Brassica napus Genic Male Sterile Line and Restorer Line" International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19, no. 9: 2689. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19092689

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop