Next Article in Journal
The Synthesis of Polycarboxylate Dispersants Containing Benzenesulfonic Acid Groups and Their Performance in Promoting Coal Particle Dispersion
Previous Article in Journal
Amide-Based Anti-Wear/Extreme-Pressure Additives for Silica-Thickened Greases: Structure and Wear Resistance
Previous Article in Special Issue
Design, Synthesis and Antiplasmodial Activities of a Library of Fluorine-Based 3-Benzylmenadiones
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

A Concise Asymmetric Synthesis of Sex Pheromone of Euproctis pseudoconspersa (Strand) and Its Enantiomer

Department of Applied Chemistry, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Molecules 2025, 30(12), 2494; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30122494
Submission received: 8 May 2025 / Revised: 31 May 2025 / Accepted: 4 June 2025 / Published: 6 June 2025
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Synthesis of Bioactive Compounds, 3rd Edition)

Abstract

:
The tea tussock moth, Euproctis pseudoconspersa (Strand), is a serious pest, and its sex pheromone is (R)-10,14-dimethylpentadecyl isobutyrate. A new and concise asymmetric synthesis of the sex pheromone and its enantiomer was accomplished. The chiral methyl of the pheromone was introduced by Evans’s template, while the extension of the carbon chain was achieved through Li2CuCl4-catalyzed coupling of chiral tosylate with Grignard reagent.

1. Introduction

The tea tussock moth, Euproctis pseudoconspersa (Strand) (Lepidoptera: Lymantridae), is a serious pest found in the tea plant, Camellia sinensis; the Japanese camellia, Camellia japonica; and the tea-oil plant, Camellia oleifera [1,2]. This pest is distributed throughout China, Korea, and Japan [3,4]. The larva feed on tea leaves and have caused significant damage to tea plantations [5]. Moreover, the venomous hair on the larvae, pupae, and adults could cause irritation and inflammation of human skin [6,7]. The conventional chemical insecticides have disadvantages of toxicity to mammals, negative environmental impacts, and inducing pest resistance; it would be meaningful to search for a more environment-friendly and effective alternative to control the tea tussock moth [8,9].
Pheromone-based pest control is an alternative strategy with the advantages of being environment benign, effective, and rarely inducing pest resistance [10,11]. In 1994, Wakamura identified the sex pheromone of E. pseudoconspersa as 10,14-dimethylpentadecyl isobutyrate [12]. Later, Wakamura synthesized (R)- and (S)-10,14-dimethylpentadecyl isobutyrate from (S)- and (R)-citronellol, and also found that the R enantiomer was as active as the natural pheromone [13]. The sex pheromone could attract the male tea tussock moth [14,15]. Therefore, it could be used for mass trapping and significantly reduce mating rates [16]; this motivated the synthesis of the sex pheromone. In 1998, Millar and Zhao developed a concise synthesis of the sex pheromone from the chiral source of (R)-(−)-citronellyl bromide [14]. In 2017, Du and Zheng completed the asymmetric synthesis of the pheromone by Evans’s template and Julia–Kocienski coupling [17]. In 2018, they developed another synthesis from the recycling of wastewater from the steroid industry [18]. Recently, they developed a novel synthesis of the sex pheromone based on Evans’s template [19] (Scheme 1).
To research further biological activities of the two enantiomers, herein a new and concise synthesis of the sex pheromone of the tea tussock moth and its enantiomer (Figure 1) has been achieved.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Retrosynthetic Analysis

The retrosynthetic analysis of the sex pheromone of E. pseudoconspersa, (R)-10,14-dimethylpentadecyl isobutyrate ((R)-1) is illustrated in Scheme 2. The target pheromone (R)-1 could be prepared through an esterification of (R)-10,14-dimethylpentadecan-1-ol ((R)-10) and isobutyric anhydride (11). Chiral alcohol (R)-10 could be prepared by Li2CuCl4 catalyzed coupling of chiral tosylate (R)-7 with a Grignard reagent. Evans’s chiral auxiliaries have been used in the synthesis of many natural products, which could induce chirality with high enantiomerical purity [20,21]. Therefore, we envisaged that this strategy could construct the stereocenter of chiral alcohol (R)-6, and the starting materials could be unsaturated acid 2 and (R)-4-phenyl-2-oxazolidinone ((R)-3). Following the similar procedure for sex pheromone (R)-1, its enantiomer (S)-10,14-dimethylpentadecyl isobutyrate ((S)-1) could be prepared.

2.2. Synthesis of Chiral Alcohols (R)- and (S)-6

According to the retrosynthetic analysis of the sex pheromone (R)-1, our synthesis began with the preparation of chiral alcohols (R)- and (S)-6 (Scheme 3). The reaction of undec-10-enoic acid (2) with pivaloyl chloride provided the corresponding mixed anhydride, followed by the acylation with (R)-4-phenyloxazolinone ((R)-3) to afford imide (R)-4 [22,23]. The chiral methyl of imide (R,R)-5 was introduced by the diastereoselective methylation with CH3I [24], and the absolute configuration of the new stereocenter was assigned as (R) according to Evans’s auxiliary precedent [25]. The dr was more than 98:2, determined by 13C NMR spectra of imide (R,R)-5. The final treatment with NaBH4 resulted in the formation of (R)-2-methylpentadec-14-en-1-ol ((R)-6) (86% yield, >98:2 er, based on the signal/noise ratio of the 19F NMR spectra of its Mosher ester) [26]. Its specific rotations were consistent with the literature value [27], which supported (R)-configuration of chiral alcohol (R)-6. Similarly, (S)-2-methylundec-10-en-1-ol ((S)-6) (>98:2 er, based on the signal/noise ratio of the 19F NMR spectra of its Mosher ester) was prepared via the acylation of unsaturated acid 2 with (S)-4-phenyl-2-oxazolidinone ((S)-3), diastereoselective methylation of imide (S)-4, and the reductive cleavage of the chiral auxiliary from imide (S,S)-5 with NaBH4.

2.3. Synthesis of Chiral Alcohols (R)- and (S)-10

Having completed the synthesis of the chiral alcohols (R)- and (S)-6, we next prepared chiral alcohols (R)- and (S)-10 (Scheme 4). Chiral alcohol (R)-6 was treated with TsCl to afford (R)-2-methylpentadec-14-en-1-yl 4-methylbenzenesulfonate ((R)-7) in 88% yield [28], which was converted to (R)-10,14-dimethylpentadec-1-ene ((R)-9) smoothly through the reaction with isopentyl magnesium bromide (8) in the presence of Li2CuCl4 [29]. The subsequent hydroboration-oxidation of (R)-10,14-dimethylpentadec-1-ene ((R)-9) provided (R)-10,14-dimethylpentadecan-1-ol ((R)-10) [30]. Following the similar procedure for chiral alcohol (R)-10, (S)-10,14-dimethylpentadecan-1-ol ((S)-10) was synthesized by the tosylation of chiral alcohol (S)-6, Li2CuCl4-catalyzed coupling of chiral tosylate (S)-7 with Grignard reagent and hydroboration-oxidation of terminal olefin (S)-9.

2.4. Synthesis of Sex Pheromone of E. pseudoconspersa and Its Enantiomer

With the key chiral alcohols (R)- and (S)-10 in hand, the sex pheromone of E. pseudoconspersa and its enantiomer were synthesized (Scheme 5). In the presence of 4-(dimethylamino)pyridine, the reaction of isobutyric anhydride (11) with chiral alcohol (R)-10 generated the target pheromone (R)-1 in 93% yield [31]. Its enantiomer (S)-10,14-dimethylpentadecyl isobutyrate ((S)-1) was also prepared by the esterification of chiral alcohol (S)-10 with isobutyric anhydride (11). Their NMR spectra, HRMS, and the specific rotation were consistent with the references [18,19].

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. General Information

Unless otherwise stated, all reactions were conducted in oven-dried glassware with a Schlenk line under an argon atmosphere, and all reaction mixtures were magnetically stirred. Tetrahydrofuran, triethylamine, and diethyl ether were distilled from CaH2 before use, and all starting materials and reagents were purchased from commercial sources. Optical rotations were determined by a Rudolph AUTOPOL-IV polarimeter (Rudolph Research Analytical, Hackettstown, NJ, USA), with a 0.25 dm cell length. 1H and 13C NMR spectra were recorded on a Bruker AscendTM 500 MHz spectrometer (Bruker, Billerica, MA, USA) and using deuterated solvent. Chemical shifts were reported in parts per million (ppm) with an internal standard of tetramethylsilane (0.00 ppm) for 1H NMR and the residual protium CDCl3 (77.16 ppm) for 13C NMR spectra. High-resolution mass spectra (HRMS) analyses were performed on Waters LCT Premier™ with an ESI mass spectrometer (Waters, Milford, MA, USA).

3.2. Synthesis of (R)-4-Phenyl-3-(undec-10-enoyl)oxazolidin-2-one ((R)-4) (New Compound)

  • To a 500 mL three-neck flask were added undec-10-enoic acid (2) (5.00 g, 27.13 mmol) Et3N (5.77 g, 56.97 mmol) and THF (150 mL) at room temperature. The solution was cooled to −78 °C, then pivaloyl chloride (3.93 g, 32.55 mmol) was added and stirred for 0.5 h. The reaction solution was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred for 1 h. (R)-4-Phenyl-2-oxazolidinone ((R)-3) (4.87 g, 29.84 mmol) in THF (40 mL) and LiCl (3.45 g, 81.39 mmol) were then added. The reaction mixture was cooled to −78 °C again and stirred for 1 h. After the reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred for additional 10 h, it was quenched with saturated NH4Cl aqueous solution (60 mL). Two phases were separated, and the aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc (60 × 3 mL). The combined organic phases were washed with brine (120 mL), and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated by a rotary evaporator. The residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel with an eluent of petroleum ether/EtOAc 10:1 to afford (R)-4-phenyl-3-(pentadec-14-enoyl)oxazolidin-2-one ((R)-4) (7.15 g, 80% yield) as a white solid. [α ] D 22 = −39.042 (c = 3.76, CHCl3). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.39–7.28 (m, 5H), 5.80 (ddt, J = 16.9, 10.3, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 5.42 (dd, J = 8.8, 3.7 Hz, 1H), 4.98 (dd, J = 17.1, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 4.93–4.91 (m, 1H), 4.68 (t, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 4.27 (dd, J = 8.9, 3.7 Hz, 1H), 2.97–2.86 (m, 2H), 2.04–2.00 (m, 2H), 1.61–1.58 (m, 2H), 1.36–1.23 (m, 10H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 173.00, 153.87, 139.34, 139.31, 129.29, 128.80, 126.03, 114.24, 70.06, 57.68, 35.66, 33.89, 29.38, 29.15, 29.10, 29.00, 24.25. HRMS (ESI): calculated for C20H28O3N [M + H]+: 330.20637, found: 330.20667.

3.3. Synthesis of (R)-3-((R)-2-Methylundec-10-enoyl)-4-phenyloxazolidin-2-one ((R,R))-5) (New Compound)

  • To a 250 mL three-neck flask were added (R)-4-phenyl-3-(pentadec-14-enoyl)oxazolidin-2-one ((R)-4) (2.96 g, 8.98 mmol) and THF (10 mL) at room temperature. The solution was cooled to −78 °C, then NaHMDS (6.75 mL, 2.0 M in THF, 13.50 mmol) was added dropwise and stirred for 1 h. Iodomethane (6.37 g, 44.88 mmol) in THF (50 mL) was added dropwise over 2 h. After the reaction mixture was stirred for 4 h at −78 °C, it was quenched with saturated NH4Cl aqueous solution (40 mL). The two phases were separated, and the aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc (50 × 3 mL). The combined organic phases were washed with brine (200 mL) and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated by a rotary evaporator. The residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel with an eluent of petroleum ether/EtOAc 10:1 to afford (R)-3-((R)-2-methylundec-10-enoyl)-4-phenyloxazolidin-2-one ((R,R)-5) (2.69 g, 87% yield, dr > 98:2, determined by its 13C NMR spectra) as a white solid. m.p. 38–40 °C. [α ] D 22 = −88.197 (c = 3.11, CHCl3). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.38–7.27 (m, 5H), 5.79 (dt, J = 16.7, 8.5 Hz, 1H), 5.43 (dd, J = 8.7, 3.7 Hz, 1H), 4.99 (d, J = 17.1 Hz, 1H), 4.92 (d, J = 10.2 Hz, 1H), 4.67 (t, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 4.23 (dd, J = 8.8, 3.7 Hz, 1H), 3.73 (h, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 2.05–2.00 (m, 2H), 1.72–1.66 (m, 1H), 1.38–1.27 (m,11H), 1.10 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 176.72, 153.46, 139.43, 139.27, 129.26, 128.70, 125.79, 114.22, 69.82, 57.81, 37.88, 33.86, 33.12, 29.67, 29.41, 29.13, 28.98, 27.35, 17.42. HRMS (ESI): calculated for C21H30O3N [M + H]+: 344.22202, found: 344.22284.

3.4. Synthesis of (R)-2-Methylundec-10-en-1-ol ((R)-6) (CAS 1156505-01-9)

  • To a 200 mL Schlenk flask were added (R)-3-((R)-2-methylundec-10-enoyl)-4-phenyloxazolidin-2-one ((R,R)-5) (1.17 g, 3.40 mmol) and THF (25 mL) at room temperature. The solution was cooled to 0 °C, then NaBH4 (0.52 g, 13.74 mmol) in water (2.5 mL) was added dropwise carefully. The reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature, and stirred for 8 h. After being cooled to 0 °C, HCl aqueous solution (1 M) was added dropwise carefully to destroy the excess NaBH4. The two phases were separated, and the aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc (20 × 3 mL). The combined organic phases were washed with brine (80 mL), and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated by a rotary evaporator. The residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel with an eluent of petroleum ether/EtOAc 5:1 to afford (R)-2-methylpentadec-14-en-1-ol ((R)-6) (0.54 g, 86% yield, > 98:2 er, based on the signal/noise ratio of the 19F NMR spectra of its Mosher ester, see the details in Supplementary Materials) as a colorless oil. [α ] D 22 = +8.162 (c = 1.81, CHCl3). Lit. [27] [α ] D 25 = + 8.40 (c = 4.60, CHCl3). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.81 (ddt, J = 16.9, 10.2, 6.7 Hz, 1H), 4.99 (dq, J = 17.1, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 4.96–4.92 (m, 1H), 3.50 (dd, J = 10.5, 5.8 Hz, 1H), 3.41 (dd, J = 10.5, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 2.06–2.02 (m, 2H), 1.61–1.57 (m, 1H), 1.43–1.25 (m, 12H), 1.11 (dd, J = 12.1, 9.0 Hz, 1H), 0.91 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 139.35, 114.25, 68.53, 35.89, 33.93, 33.27, 30.01, 29.60, 29.25, 29.06, 27.09, 16.72. HRMS (ESI) m/z calcd. for C12H23O [M − H]+: 183.17434, found183.17367.

3.5. Synthesis of (S)-4-Phenyl-3-(undec-10-enoyl)oxazolidin-2-one((S)-4) (New Compound)

  • According to the similar procedure for oxazolidinone imide (R)-4, the acylation of undec-10-enoic acid (2) (6.00 g, 32.56 mmol) with (S)-4-phenyl-2-oxazolidinone ((S)-3) (4.71 g, 28.86 mmol) afforded (S)-4-phenyl-3-(undec-10-enoyl)oxazolidin-2-one ((S)-4) (9.00 g, 84% yield) as a white solid. [α ] D 22 = +44.468 (c = 3.76, CHCl3). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.39–7.28 (m, 5H), 5.80 (ddt, J = 17.0, 10.1, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 5.42 (dd, J = 8.7, 3.7 Hz, 1H), 4.98 (dd, J = 17.1, 2.0 Hz, 1H), 4.92 (dd, J = 10.2, 2.2 Hz, 1H), 4.68 (t, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 4.27 (dd, J = 8.9, 3.7 Hz, 1H), 2.97–2.86 (m, 2H), 2.04–2.00 (m, 2H), 1.62–1.56 (m, 2H), 1.36–1.24 (m, 10H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 172.97, 153.85, 139.33, 139.31, 129.28, 128.79, 126.02, 114.24, 70.05, 57.67, 35.65, 33.89, 29.37, 29.14, 29.09, 28.99, 24.23. HRMS (ESI): calculated for C20H27O3NNa [M + Na]+: 352.18831, found: 352.18842.

3.6. Synthesis of (S)-3-((S)-2-Methylundec-10-enoyl)-4-phenyloxazolidin-2-one ((S,S)-5) (New Compound)

  • According to the similar procedure for oxazolidinone imide (R,R)-5, the alkylation of (S)-4-phenyl-3-(undec-10-enoyl)oxazolidin-2-one ((S)-4) (4.00 g, 12.14 mmol) with iodomethane (8.62 g, 60.73 mmol) afforded (S)-3-((S)-2-methylundec-10-enoyl)-4-phenyloxazolidin-2-one ((S,S)-5) (3.13 g, 75% yield, dr > 98:2, determined by its 13C NMR spectra) as a white solid. m.p. 37–39 °C. [α ] D 22 = +76.918 (c = 4.07, CHCl3). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.39–7.27 (m, 5H), 5.80 (ddt, J = 16.9, 10.1, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 5.43 (dd, J = 8.8, 3.7 Hz, 1H), 4.99 (dd, J = 8.8, 3.7 Hz, 1H), 4.92 (dd, J = 8.8, 3.7 Hz, 1H), 4.67 (t, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 4.24 (ddd, J = 8.9, 3.8, 1.0 Hz, 1H), 3.73 (h, J = 6.8 Hz, 1H), 2.06–2.00 (m, 2H), 1.73–1.66 (m, 1H), 1.38–1.27 (m, 11H), 1.10 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 176.77, 153.49, 139.45, 139.31, 129.30, 128.74, 125.82, 114.24, 69.85, 57.85, 37.92, 33.89, 33.16, 29.70, 29.44, 29.17, 29.01, 27.38, 17.44. HRMS (ESI): calculated for C21H29O3NNa [M + Na]+: 366.20396, found: 366.20413.

3.7. Synthesis of (S)-2-Methylundec-10-en-1-ol ((S)-6) (CAS 2091161-95-2)

  • According to the similar procedure for alcohol (R)-6, the reductive cleavage of (S)-3-((S)-2-methylundec-10-enoyl)-4-phenyloxazolidin-2-one ((S,S)-5) (2.01 g, 5.85 mmol) with NaBH4 (0.89 g, 23.40 mmol) afforded (S)-2-methylundec-10-en-1-ol ((S)-6) (0.88 g, 82% yield, >98:2 er, based on the signal/noise ratio of the 19F NMR spectra of its Mosher ester, see the details in Supplementary Materials) as a colorless oil. [α ] D 22 = −7.156 (c = 2.18, CHCl3). Lit. [32] [α ] D 25 = −5.1 (c = 0.85, CHCl3, 82% ee). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.81 (ddt, J = 16.9, 10.2, 6.7 Hz, 1H), 4.99 (dq, J = 17.2, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 4.93 (ddt, J = 10.2, 2.4, 1.2 Hz, 1H), 3.50 (dd, J = 10.5, 6.2 Hz, 1H), 3.41 (dd, J = 10.5, 6.2 Hz, 1H), 2.06–2.02 (m, 2H), 1.63–1.59 (m, 1H), 1.39–1.24 (m, 12H), 1.13–1.09 (m, 1H), 0.91 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 139.37, 114.25, 68.55, 35.90, 33.94, 33.27, 30.01, 29.60, 29.26, 29.07, 27.10, 16.72. HRMS (ESI): calculated for C12H23 [M − OH]+: 167.17943, found: 167.18015.

3.8. Synthesis of (R)-2-Methylundec-10-en-1-yl 4-methylbenzenesulfonate ((R)-7) (New Compound)

  • To a 200 mL Schlenk flask were added (R)-2-methylpentadec-14-en-1-ol ((R)-6) (2.00 g, 11.40 mmol) and CH2Cl2 (20 mL) at room temperature. The solution was cooled to 0 °C, then Et3N (3.07 g, 30.34 mmol) and DMAP (1.32 g, 10.80 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (20 mL) were added. Subsequently, TsCl (3.93 g, 20.61 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (30 mL) was added dropwise over 30 min. After the reaction mixture was allowed to warm to room temperature and stirred for 8 h, it was quenched with saturated NH4Cl aqueous solution (50 mL). The two phases were separated, and the aqueous phase was extracted with CH2Cl2 (40 × 3 mL). The combined organic phases were washed with brine (150 mL) and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated by a rotary evaporator. The residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel with an eluent of petroleum ether/EtOAc 10:1 to afford (R)-2-methylpentadec-14-en-1-yl 4-methylbenzenesulfonate ((R)-7) (3.23 g, 88% yield) as a pale yellow oil. [α ] D 22 = −3.178 (c = 3.15, CHCl3). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.80–7.77 (m, 2H), 7.34 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 2H), 5.81 (ddt, J = 16.9, 10.2, 6.6 Hz, 1H), 4.99 (dq, J = 17.1, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 4.93 (ddt, J = 10.2, 2.4, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 3.88 (dd, J = 9.3, 5.7 Hz, 1H), 3.80 (dd, J = 9.3, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 2.45 (s, 3H), 2.05–2.00 (m, 2H), 1.79–1.73 (m, 1H), 1.37–1.07 (m, 12H), 0.87 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 144.71, 139.27, 133.36, 129.90, 128.02, 114.29, 75.26, 33.89, 32.93, 32.78, 29.74, 29.47, 29.18, 29.02, 26.67, 21.75, 16.57. HRMS (ESI): calculated for C19H30O3NaS [M + Na]+: 361.18079, found: 361.18073.

3.9. Synthesis of (R)-10,14-Dimethylpentadec-1-ene ((R)-9) (New Compound)

  • To a 250 mL three-neck flask was added (R)-2-methylpentadec-14-en-1-yl 4-methylbenzenesulfonate ((R)-7) (2.95 g, 8.71 mmol) in anhydrous THF (10 mL) at room temperature. After being to 0 °C, isopentyl magnesium bromide (8) (26.80 mL, 1.3 M in THF, 34.84 mmol) was then added dropwise. Subsequently, a solution of Li2CuCl4 (26.10 mL, 0.1 M in THF, 2.61 mmol) was added dropwise at 0 °C. The reaction mixture was cooled to −78 °C and stirred for 1 h, then warmed to −10 °C and stirred for 2 h. After the reaction mixture was allowed to warm to 25 °C and stirred for 8 h, it was quenched with a saturated NH4Cl aqueous solution (80 mL) at 0 °C. The two phases were separated, and the aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc (100 × 3 mL). The combined organic phases were washed with brine (300 mL) and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated by a rotary evaporator. The residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel with an eluent of n-hexane to afford (R)-10,14-dimethylpentadec-1-ene ((R)-9) (1.99 g, 96% yield) as a colorless oil. [α ] D 22 = +0.932 (c = 2.15, CHCl3). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.82 (ddt, J = 16.9, 10.2, 6.7 Hz, 1H), 4.99 (dq, J = 17.1, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 4.93 (ddt, J = 10.1, 2.3, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 2.06–2.02 (m, 2H), 1.56–1.48 (m, 1H), 1.39–1.22 (m, 19H), 0.86 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 6H), 0.83 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 139.44, 114.22, 39.53, 37.48, 37.25, 33.98, 32.92, 30.11, 29.70, 29.32, 29.12, 28.14, 27.22, 27.20, 24.95, 22.87, 22.78, 19.87. HRMS (ESI): calculated for C17H36O [M + H2O]+: 256.27607, found: 256.27584.

3.10. Synthesis of (R)-10,14-Dimethylpentadecan-1-ol ((R)-10) (CAS 164260-11-1)

  • To a 50 mL Schlenk tube were added (R)-10,14-dimethylpentadec-1-ene ((R)-9) (1.30 g, 5.45 mmol) and anhydrous THF (10 mL) at room temperature. The resulting solution was cooled to 0 °C, then borane (1.82 mL, 1.0 M in THF, 1.82 mmol) was added dropwise over 20 min. The reaction mixture was warmed to room temperature and stirred for 1 h, and the solution of tris((S)-10,14-dimethylpentadecyl)borane was obtained. Then the solution was cooled to 0 °C, and sodium hydroxide (0.61 mL, 3 N, 1.82 mmol) was added. The resulting solution was cooled to −20 °C, and hydrogen peroxide (0.65 mL, 30%, 6.32 mmol) was added dropwise. After the reaction was warmed to 35 °C and stirred for 1 h, it was quenched with water (10 mL). The two phases were separated, and the aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc (15 × 3 mL). The combined organic phases were washed with brine (20 mL) and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4, filtered, and concentrated by a rotary evaporator. The residue was purified by column chromatography on silica gel with an eluent of petroleum ether/EtOAc 5:1 to afford (R)-10,14-dimethylpentadecan-1-ol ((R)-10) (0.77 g, 55% yield) as a pale yellow oil. [α ] D 22 = + 0.556 (c = 1.44, CHCl3). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.64 (t, J = 6.6 Hz, 2H), 1.59–1.49 (m, 3H), 1.35–1.32 (m, 1H), 1.29–1.20 (m, 17H), 1.15–1.11 (m, 2H), 1.09–1.03 (m, 2H), 0.87 (d, J = 6.7 Hz, 6H), 0.84 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 63.25, 39.52, 37.47, 37.25, 32.97, 32.91, 30.15, 29.79, 29.78, 29.59, 28.13, 27.23, 25.89, 24.95, 22.87, 22.77, 19.86. HRMS (ESI): calculated for C17H37O [M + H]+: 257.28389, found: 257.28122.

3.11. Synthesis of (S)-2-Methylundec-10-en-1-yl 4-methylbenzenesulfonate ((S)-7) (New Compound)

  • According to the similar procedure for tosylate (R)-7, the tosylation of (S)-2-methylpentadec-14-en-1-ol ((S)-6) (1.50 g, 8.14 mmol) with TsCl (2.81 g, 14.72 mmol) afforded (S)-2-methylundec-10-en-1-yl 4-methylbenzenesulfonate ((S)-7) (2.42 g, 88% yield) as a pale yellow oil. [α ] D 22 = +3.734 (c = 1.61, CHCl3). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 7.79 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 2H), 7.34 (d, J = 8.0 Hz, 2H), 5.81 (ddt, J = 16.9, 10.2, 6.7 Hz, 1H), 4.99 (dq, J = 17.1, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 4.93 (ddt, J = 10.2, 2.3, 1.3 Hz, 1H), 3.88 (dd, J = 9.3, 5.7 Hz, 1H), 3.80 (dd, J = 9.4, 6.5 Hz, 1H), 2.45 (s, 3H), 2.05–2.00 (m, 2H), 1.78–1.74 (m, 1H), 1.37–1.10 (m, 12H), 0.87 (d, J = 6.8 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 144.71, 139.28, 133.36, 129.90, 128.02, 114.29, 75.26, 33.90, 32.94, 32.78, 29.74, 29.48, 29.18, 29.02, 26.67, 21.76, 16.57. HRMS (ESI): calculated for C19H32O4S [M + H2O]+: 356.20158, found: 356.20156.

3.12. Synthesis of (S)-10,14-Dimethylpentadec-1-ene ((S)-9) (New Compound)

  • According to the similar procedure for alkene (R)-9, the coupling of (S)-2-methylpentadec-14-en-1-yl 4-methylbenzenesulfonate ((S)-7) (2.02 g, 5.97 mmol) with isopentyl magnesium bromide (8) (18.38 mL, 1.3 M in THF, 23.88 mmol) catalyzed by Li2CuCl4 (18.0 mL, 0.1 M in THF, 1.79 mmol) afforded (S)-10,14-dimethylpentadec-1-ene ((S)-9) (1.28 g, 90% yield) as a colorless oil. [α ] D 22 = −0.631 (c = 1.27, CHCl3). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 5.81 (ddt, J = 16.9, 10.2, 6.7 Hz, 1H), 4.99 (dq, J = 17.1, 1.7 Hz, 1H), 4.94–4.91 (m, 1H), 2.06–2.02 (m, 2H), 1.55–1.50 (m, 1H), 1.39–1.15 (m, 19H), 0.87 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 6H), 0.83 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 139.41, 114.24, 39.55, 37.50, 37.27, 34.00, 32.94, 30.13, 29.72, 29.34, 29.14, 28.15, 27.24, 24.98, 22.88, 22.79, 19.88. HRMS (ESI): calculated for C17H36O [M + H2O]+: 256.27607, found: 256.27575.

3.13. Synthesis of (S)-10,14-Dimethylpentadecan-1-ol ((S)-10) (CAS 164260-12-2)

  • According to the similar procedure for alcohol (R)-10, the hydroboration-oxidation of (S)-10,14-dimethylpentadec-1-ene ((S)-9) (1.26 g, 5.28 mmol) with borane (1.76 mL, 1.0 M in THF, 1.76 mmol) and hydrogen peroxide (0.63 mL, 30%, 6.12 mmol) afforded (S)-10,14-dimethylpentadecan-1-ol ((S)-10) (0.73 g, 54% yield) as a colorless oil. [α ] D 22 = −0.214 (c = 3.74, CHCl3). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 3.63 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H), 1.59–1.54 (m, 2H), 1.52–1.48 (m, 1H), 1.45 (br s, 1H), 1.36–1.20 (m, 17H), 1.15–1.11 (m, 2H), 1.09–1.03 (m, 2H), 0.87 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 6H), 0.84 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 63.20, 39.51, 37.46, 37.25, 32.96, 32.91, 30.15, 29.79, 29.77, 29.59, 28.12, 27.22, 25.89, 24.94, 22.85, 22.76, 19.85. HRMS (ESI): calculated for C17H35 [M − OH]+: 239.27333, found: 239.27253.

3.14. Synthesis of (R)-10,14-Dimethylpentadecyl Isobutyrate ((R)-1) (164260-03-1)

  • To a 20 mL Schlenk tube were added (R)-10,14-dimethylpentadecan-1-ol ((R)-10) (0.40 g, 1.56 mmol) and DMAP (0.19 g, 1.56 mmol) in CH2Cl2 (5 mL) at room temperature. Isobutyric anhydride (11) (0.37 g, 2.34 mmol) was then added dropwise. After the reaction solution was stirred for 9 h at the same temperature, it was diluted with CH2Cl2 (5 mL). The organic solution was washed with HCl aqueous solution (1 N, 20 mL), NaOH aqueous solution (1 N, 20 mL), NaHCO3 solution (20 mL) and brine (20 mL) sequentially. Finaly, the organic solution was dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and concentrated by a rotary evaporator to afford (R)-10,14-dimethylpentadecyl isobutyrate ((R)-1) (0.47 g, 93% yield) as a pale yellow oil. [α ] D 22 = +1.148 (c = 2.79, CHCl3). Lit. [19] [α ] D 23 = + 0.581 (c = 2.3, CHCl3). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.06 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H), 2.53 (h, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 1.65–1.59 (m, 2H), 1.56–1.48 (m, 1H), 1.36–1.22 (m, 18H), 1.16 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H), 1.14–1.11 (m, 1H), 1.10–1.03 (m, 2H), 0.87 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 6H), 0.84 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 177.42, 64.56, 39.52, 37.47, 37.25, 34.20, 32.91, 30.13, 29.75, 29.68, 29.40, 28.80, 28.13, 27.22, 26.05, 24.95, 22.86, 22.77, 19.86, 19.17. HRMS (ESI): calculated for C21H42O2KNa [M + K + Na]+: 388.27141, found: 388.27005.

3.15. Synthesis of (S)-10,14-Dimethylpentadecyl Isobutyrate ((S)-1) (CAS164260-04-2)

  • According to the similar procedure for the sex pheromone (R)-1, the esterification of (S)-10,14-dimethylpentadecan-1-ol ((S)-10) (0.30 g, 1.17 mmol) with isobutyric anhydride (11) (0.28 g, 1.77 mmol) afforded (S)-10,14-dimethylpentadecyl isobutyrate ((S)-1) (0.34 g, 90% yield) as a pale yellow oil. [α ] D 22 = −0.563 (c = 1.42, CHCl3). Lit. [18] [α ] D 25 = −0.28 (c = 2.40, CHCl3). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3) δ 4.06 (t, J = 6.7 Hz, 2H), 2.53 (h, J = 7.0 Hz, 1H), 1.65–1.59 (m, 2H), 1.56–1.48 (m, 1H), 1.37–1.21 (m, 18H), 1.16 (d, J = 7.0 Hz, 6H), 1.14–1.11 (m, 1H), 1.09–1.05 (m, 2H), 0.86 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 6H), 0.84 (d, J = 6.6 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3) δ 177.38, 64.54, 39.51, 37.46, 37.24, 34.19, 32.91, 30.12, 29.75, 29.67, 29.40, 28.80, 28.12, 27.21, 26.05, 24.94, 22.85, 22.76, 19.85, 19.15. HRMS (ESI): calculated for C21H41O2 [M − H]+: 325.31011, found: 325.30765.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we have developed a new and concise asymmetric synthesis of the sex pheromone of E. pseudoconspersa, (R)-10,14-dimethylpentadecyl isobutyrate ((R)-1), and its enantiomer. The key reactions of our strategy involved Evans’s chiral auxiliaries, the coupling of chiral tosylate with Grignard reagent, and the esterification of chiral alcohol. Moreover, the synthetic pheromone would be useful to control the tea tussock moth.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/molecules30122494/s1. Research on the Optical Purity of the Chiral Alcohols (R)- and (S)-6, 1H and 13C NMR Spectra of the Products. Refs. [33,34] are cited in the Supplementary Materials.

Author Contributions

Methodology, B.A., S.L. and J.W.; Writing—review & editing, D.L. and Q.B.; Supervision, J.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key Technology Research and Development Program of China (No. 2023YFD1800900).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this article are available in the Supplementary Materials.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Hu, J.; Song, H.; Cao, Z.; Chen, Y.; Wang, J.; Zhu, W.; Yao, D.; Han, B. Species and control techniques of main diseases and insect pests of Camellia oleifera in Anhui province. Plant Dis. Pests 2023, 14, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  2. Wakamura, S.; Yasuda, T.; Mochizuki, F. Mating behavior of the tea tussock moth, Euproctis pseudoconspersa (Strand) (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Appl. Entomol. Zoolog. 1996, 31, 619–621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, X.Z.; Li, S.S.; Luo, Z.X.; Cai, X.M.; Bian, L.; Xiu, C.L.; Fu, N.X.; Liu, N.Y.; Zhang, Z.Q.; Li, Z.Q. Transcriptome profiling of Euproctis pseudoconspersa reveals candidate olfactory genes for type III sex pheromone detection. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26, 1405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Tsai, R.-S.; Yang, E.-C.; Wu, C.-Y.; Tseng, H.-K.; Chow, Y.-S. A potent sex attractant of the male tea tussock moth, Euproctis pseudoconspersa (Strand) (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) in Taiwan: Field and eag responses. Zool. Stud. 1999, 38, 301–306. [Google Scholar]
  5. Li, Z.-q.; Yuan, T.-t.; Cui, S.-w.; Zhao, Y.-j.; Shao, Y.-h.; Shang, J.-n.; Luo, Z.-x.; Cai, X.-m.; Bian, L.; Chen, Z.-m. Development of a high-efficiency sex pheromone formula to control Euproctis pseudoconspersa. J. Integr. Agric. 2023, 22, 195–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, X.Q.; Gu, Q.Y.; Zhang, W.; Jiang, H.Y.; Chen, S.C.; Smagghe, G.; Niu, J.Z.; Wang, J.J. Prevalence of a novel bunyavirus in tea tussock moth Euproctis pseudoconspersa (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). J. Insect Sci. 2021, 21, 5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhao, C.H.; Millar, G.J.; Wen, Z.Z.; Wang, S.K.; Wang, X.Y.; Zhu, Y.F. Isolation, identification and synthesis of the female sex pheromone of the tea tussock moth, Euproctis pseudoconspersa (Strand) (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae). Entomol. Sin. 1996, 3, 58–69. [Google Scholar]
  8. Huang, D.; Sun, M.; Han, M.; Zhang, Z.; Miao, Y.; Zhang, J.; Yao, Y. Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) regulate the spatial distribution of Lepidoptera insects in an orchard ecosystem. Biol. Control 2020, 149, 104311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Roy, S.; Muraleedharan, N. Microbial management of arthropod pests of tea: Current state and prospects. Appl. Microbiol. Biot. 2014, 98, 5375–5386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rizvi, S.A.H.; George, J.; Reddy, G.V.P.; Zeng, X.; Guerrero, A. Latest developments in insect sex pheromone research and its application in agricultural pest management. Insects 2021, 12, 484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Souza, J.P.A.; Bandeira, P.T.; Bergmann, J.; Zarbin, P.H.G. Recent advances in the synthesis of insect pheromones: An overview from 2013 to 2022. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2023, 40, 866–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Wakamura, S.; Yasuda, T.; Ichikawa, A.; Fukumoto, T.; Mochizuki, F. Sex attractant pheromone of the tea tussock moth, Euproctis pseudoconspersa (Strand) (Lepidoptera, Lymantriidae)—Identification and field attraction. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 1994, 29, 403–411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ichikawa, A.; Yasuda, T.; Wakamura, S. Absolute configuration of sex pheromone for tea tussock moth, Euproctis pseudoconspersa (Strand) via synthesis of (R)- and (S)-10,14-dimethyl-1-pentadecyl isobutyrates. J. Chem. Ecol. 1995, 21, 627–634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Zhao, C.-H.; Millar, J.G.; Pan, K.-H.; Xu, C.-S. Responses of tea tussock moth, Euproctis pseudoconspersa, to its pheromone, (R)-10,14-dimethylpentadecyl isobutyrate, and to the S-enantiomer of its pheromone. J. Chem. Ecol. 1998, 24, 1347–1353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wakamura, S.; Ichikawa, A.; Yasuda, T.; Arakaki, N.; Fukumoto, T. EAG and field responses of the male tea tussock moth, Euproctis pseudoconspersa (Strand) (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) to (R)- and (S)-enantiomers and racemic mixture of 10,14-dimethylpentadecyl isobutyrate. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 1996, 31, 623–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, Y.M.; Ge, F.; Liu, X.H.; Feng, F.; Wang, L.J. Evaluation of mass-trapping for control of tea tussock moth Euproctis pseudoconspersa (Strand) (Lepidoptera: Lymantriidae) with synthetic sex pheromone in south China. Int. J. Pest Manag. 2005, 51, 289–295. [Google Scholar]
  17. Sun, Z.-F.; Zhou, L.-N.; Meng, Y.; Zhang, T.; Du, Z.-T.; Zheng, H. Concise asymmetric synthesis of the sex pheromone of the tea tussock moth. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 2017, 28, 1562–1567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhang, H.-L.; Sun, Z.-F.; Zhou, L.-N.; Liu, L.; Zhang, T.; Du, Z.-T. Synthesis of the sex pheromone of the tea tussock moth based on a resource chemistry strategy. Molecules 2018, 23, 1347. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sun, Z.-F.; Liu, H.; Li, Y.-F.; Duan, Y.-P.; Jin, L.-X.; Ji, X.-H.; Dai, H.-P.; Lu, J.-F. The asymmetric total synthesis of the female-produced sex pheromone of the tea tussock moth. Molecules 2024, 29, 3866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Diaz-Munoz, G.; Miranda, I.L.; Sartori, S.K.; de Rezende, D.C.; Alves Nogueira Diaz, M. Use of chiral auxiliaries in the asymmetric synthesis of biologically active compounds: A review. Chirality 2019, 31, 776–812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lin, C.; Zhu, W.; Wu, S.; Bian, Q.; Zhong, J. Asymmetric synthesis and biological activity of contact pheromone of western flower thrips, Frankliniella occidentalis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25, 11699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Peddie, V.; Butcher, R.J.; Robinson, W.T.; Wilce, M.C.J.; Traore, D.A.K.; Abell, A.D. Synthesis and conformation of fluorinated β-peptidic compounds. Chem. Eur. J. 2012, 18, 6655–6662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Fuwa, H.; Nakajima, M.; Shi, J.; Takeda, Y.; Saito, T.; Sasaki, M. A convergent synthesis of the C1-C16 segment of goniodomin A via palladium-catalyzed organostannane-thioester coupling. Org. Lett. 2011, 13, 1106–1109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wu, J.; Lin, C.; Liu, D.; Bian, Q.; Wang, M.; Zhong, J. Total synthesis of (6R,12R)-6,12-dimethylpentadecan-2-one, the sex pheromone of Diabrotica balteata Leconte. Chirality 2024, 36, e23658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Evans, D.A.; Ennis, M.D.; Mathre, D.J. Asymmetric alkylation reactions of chiral imide enolates. A practical approach to the enantioselective synthesis of α-substituted carboxylic acid derivatives. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1982, 104, 1737–1739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wu, Y.; Shen, X.; Tang, C.-J.; Chen, Z.-L.; Hu, Q.; Shi, W. Synthesis of natural fragrant molecules cis-3-methyl-4-decanolide and aerangis lactone. General enantioselective routes to β,γ-cis-disubstituted γ-lactones and γ,δ-cis-disubstituted δ-lactones. J. Org. Chem. 2002, 67, 3802–3810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Kovalenko, V.N.; Mineeva, I.V. Cyclopropane intermediates in the synthesis of chiral alcohols with methyl-branched carbon skeleton. Application in the synthesis of insect pheromones. Russ. J. Org. Chem. 2014, 50, 934–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Yu, S.H.; Liu, J.W.; An, B.Y.; Bian, Q.H.; Min, W.; Zhong, J.C. Asymmetric synthesis of the contact sex pheromone of Neoclytus acuminatus acuminatus (Fabricius). Chin. J. Org. Chem. 2024, 44, 301–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yang, S.; Che, W.; Wu, H.L.; Zhu, S.F.; Zhou, Q.L. Neutral iridium catalysts with chiral phosphine-carboxy ligands for asymmetric hydrogenation of unsaturated carboxylic acids. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 1977–1980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kono, H.; Hooz, J. Ketones and alcohols from organoboranes: Phenyl heptyl ketone, 1-hexanol, and 1-octanol. Org. Syn. 1973, 53, 77–86. [Google Scholar]
  31. Goncalves, S.M.C.; Silva, G.N.; Pitta, I.d.R.; Rego, M.J.B.d.M.; Gnoato, S.C.B.; Pitta, M.G.d.R. Novel betulin derivatives inhibit IFN-γ and modulates COX-2 expression. Nat. Prod. Res. 2020, 34, 1702–1711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Filippini, G.; Silvi, M.; Melchiorre, P. Enantioselective formal α-methylation and α-benzylation of aldehydes by means of photo-organocatalysis. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 56, 4447–4451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Tsuda, M.; Toriyabe, Y.; Endo, T.; Kobayashi, J. Application of modified Mosher’s method for primary alcohols with a methyl group at C2 position. Chem. Pharm. Bull. 2003, 51, 448–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Dale, J.A.; Mosher, H.S. Nuclear magnetic resonance enantiomer regents. Configurational correlations via nuclear magnetic resonance chemical shifts of diastereomeric mandelate, O-methylmandelate, and α-methoxy-α-trifluoromethylphenylacetate (MTPA) esters. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1973, 95, 512–519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Previous syntheses of sex pheromone of E. pseudoconspersa [13,14,17,18,19].
Scheme 1. Previous syntheses of sex pheromone of E. pseudoconspersa [13,14,17,18,19].
Molecules 30 02494 sch001
Figure 1. Sex pheromone of E. pseudoconspersa and its enantiomer.
Figure 1. Sex pheromone of E. pseudoconspersa and its enantiomer.
Molecules 30 02494 g001
Scheme 2. Retrosynthetic analysis of sex pheromone of E. pseudoconspersa (R)-1.
Scheme 2. Retrosynthetic analysis of sex pheromone of E. pseudoconspersa (R)-1.
Molecules 30 02494 sch002
Scheme 3. Synthesis of chiral alcohols (R)- and (S)-6.
Scheme 3. Synthesis of chiral alcohols (R)- and (S)-6.
Molecules 30 02494 sch003
Scheme 4. Synthesis of chiral alcohols (R)- and (S)-10.
Scheme 4. Synthesis of chiral alcohols (R)- and (S)-10.
Molecules 30 02494 sch004
Scheme 5. Synthesis of sex pheromone of E. pseudoconspersa and its enantiomer.
Scheme 5. Synthesis of sex pheromone of E. pseudoconspersa and its enantiomer.
Molecules 30 02494 sch005
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

An, B.; Liu, S.; Wang, J.; Liu, D.; Bian, Q.; Zhong, J. A Concise Asymmetric Synthesis of Sex Pheromone of Euproctis pseudoconspersa (Strand) and Its Enantiomer. Molecules 2025, 30, 2494. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30122494

AMA Style

An B, Liu S, Wang J, Liu D, Bian Q, Zhong J. A Concise Asymmetric Synthesis of Sex Pheromone of Euproctis pseudoconspersa (Strand) and Its Enantiomer. Molecules. 2025; 30(12):2494. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30122494

Chicago/Turabian Style

An, Biyu, Shengli Liu, Jianan Wang, Dan Liu, Qinghua Bian, and Jiangchun Zhong. 2025. "A Concise Asymmetric Synthesis of Sex Pheromone of Euproctis pseudoconspersa (Strand) and Its Enantiomer" Molecules 30, no. 12: 2494. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30122494

APA Style

An, B., Liu, S., Wang, J., Liu, D., Bian, Q., & Zhong, J. (2025). A Concise Asymmetric Synthesis of Sex Pheromone of Euproctis pseudoconspersa (Strand) and Its Enantiomer. Molecules, 30(12), 2494. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules30122494

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop