Testimonials

What Editors, Authors and Reviewers are saying
 

Our article on virus detection with a nanoprobe has been published online in Biosensors, a journal affiliated with MDPI. We were pleased to see that the reviewers from Biosensors [...] Read more.

I have published more than 100 scientific articles, but the speed and quality of the review and action of the editorial team in MDPI are unbelievable. There is a vibrant [...] Read more.

My experience of communicating with the staff at MDPI was positive. The reviews came quickly, were specific, and allowed me to improve the quality of the articles. The editors also [...] Read more.

It was a positive experience to publish a paper in Antioxidants. This was our first time publishing a paper in Antioxidants. The reviewers’ comments and the assistant editor’s [...] Read more.

A professional, fair, open peer-review process was conducted in a reasonable timeframe by three expert reviewers, coordinated by the academic editor. The suggestions received during the process were useful in [...] Read more.

Publishing with Algorithms was a very smooth process, from the first draft to the final published manuscript. My interactions with the staff have all been positive and I have received [...] Read more.

I am very happy with the handling of our paper by Mathematics, the timely feedback of two rounds of constructive and very helpful reviews, and an overall timespan from [...] Read more.

Thank you for helping me through the publication of this manuscript. The review process was helpful and the reviewers are not too harsh or difficult in their comments. The whole [...] Read more.

We appreciate the fast and professional handling of our manuscript submission. The journal does a very good job of putting together relevant Special Issues of topical interest and disseminating timely [...] Read more.

MDPI is a very fair and professional editor. The constructive feedback of the reviewers enabled us to improve the quality and readability of the text. The whole editing process was [...] Read more.

We are so grateful to have been published in a Special Issue of the Algorithms journal and are extremely impressed with the whole submission process. The editorial team was prompt [...] Read more.

The peer-review process gave us good contributions to improve our paper and made us reflect on our results. [...] Read more.

In 2022, we published two articles in Future Internet, and in both cases we were very pleased with both the speed and the quality of the reviews, as well [...] Read more.

We would like to thank you personally and the editorial team for your time and effort in processing our manuscript. Thanks to the clear regulations on the terms of review [...] Read more.

We are very pleased with the review process in Future Internet. All the reviewers provided really useful comments, not just formal replies, that helped us improve the paper. With [...] Read more.

I'd like to share with you my pleasant experience with the Future Internet journal. I have had two journal articles accepted for publication, and both times, reviewers provided me with [...] Read more.

Future Internet provided a smooth review process. We received three reports with insightful comments regarding specific parts of the manuscript. Reviewers were constructive and the review process improved our manuscript. [...] Read more.

We think your service is excellent, including the various article processing processes and peer review. Our article was published in just one month for the entire process, and publication was [...] Read more.

This is our second paper published in Future Internet. As always, the reviews have been extremely fast, yet very useful, and have helped us to improve the quality of [...] Read more.

I think that the peer-review process was satisfactory overall, both in terms of duration and quality. The reviewers' comments and suggestions were very useful and have certainly helped to improve [...] Read more.

Displaying testimonial 121-140 on page 7 of 55.
Back to TopTop