Search Results (63)

The association between COVID-19 vaccination and thromboembolic events has garnered significant research attention, particularly with the advent of vaccines based on adenoviral vectors, including AstraZeneca’s and Johnson & Johnson’s vaccines. This review underscores the uncommon occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE), arterial thromboembolism (ATE), and vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) following COVID-19 vaccination. Although these complications are extremely rare compared to the heightened risk of thrombosis from COVID-19 infection, elements like age, biological sex, type of vaccine and underlying health conditions may contribute to their development. In addition, rare renal complications such as acute kidney injury and thrombotic microangiopathy have been documented, broadening the spectrum of potential vaccine-associated thrombotic manifestations. Current guidelines emphasize early detection, individualized risk assessment, and use of anticoagulation therapy to mitigate risks. Despite these events, the overwhelming majority of evidence supports the continued use of COVID-19 vaccines, given their proven efficacy in reducing severe illness and mortality. In addition, recent comparative data confirm that mRNA-based vaccines are associated with a significantly lower risk of serious thrombotic events compared to adenoviral vector platforms. Ongoing research is essential to further refine preventive and therapeutic strategies, particularly for at-risk populations. Full article

Background: Retinal vascular occlusion (RVO) and retinal artery occlusion (RAO) have been reported as rare adverse events following COVID-19 vaccination, raising concerns about vaccine safety. This review synthesizes cohort and case–control studies assessing the association between COVID-19 vaccines and RVO/RAO, while exploring potential pathophysiological mechanisms. Methods: We analyzed large-scale population-based studies from South Korea, Europe, and the TriNetX database, focusing on odds ratios (OR), hazard ratios (HR), and relative risks (RR) across mRNA and adenoviral vector vaccines. Pathological processes were hypothesized based on molecular and clinical evidence. Results: Studies investigating the association between COVID-19 vaccination and retinal vascular occlusion show conflicting results; some studies report no association (e.g., OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.60–1.45), others suggest reduced risk (e.g., OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.64–0.99), and one indicates increased risk over two years (HR 2.19, 95% CI 2.00–2.39). Adenoviral vector vaccines, particularly ChAdOx1, show higher RAO incidence in specific cohorts. Proposed mechanisms include vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) via anti-PF4 antibodies, spike protein-mediated endothelial dysfunction, and adjuvant-driven inflammation. Conclusions: While causality remains unproven, temporal heterogeneity and vaccine type-specific risks warrant further investigation. Longitudinal studies with robust controls are needed to clarify these associations in the post-pandemic context. Full article

Vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a rare thrombotic disorder first identified in 2021 as a catastrophic syndrome associated with anti-SARS-CoV-2 adenoviral vector (AdV)-vaccine administration. It is characterized by the presence of oligo- or monoclonal anti-PF4 antibodies able to induce in vitro platelet activation in the presence of PF4. In addition to this immune-based pathomechanism, random splicing events of the Adv-vector DNA encoding for SARS-CoV-2 spike protein resulting in the secretion of soluble spike variants have been postulated as a possible pathophysiological mechanism. More recently, some novel clinical-pathological anti-PF4-associated entities also characterized by thrombosis, thrombocytopenia, and VITT-like antibodies but independent from heparin or AdV-vaccine administration have been identified. To date, these VITT-like disorders have been reported following the administration of vaccines different from anti-SARS-CoV-2 AdV-vaccines, like human papillomavirus (HPV) and mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines, following a bacterial or viral respiratory infection, and in patients with a monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. The purpose of this review is to provide an update on the knowledge on VITT pathogenesis, focusing on recent findings on anti-PF4 antibodies, on a possible genetic predisposition to VITT, on VITT-antibody intracellular activated pathways, on lipid metabolism alterations, and on new VITT-like disorders. Full article

Over the past several decades, viral vector-based vaccines have emerged as some of the most versatile and potent platforms in modern vaccinology. Their capacity to deliver genetic material encoding target antigens directly into host cells enables strong cellular and humoral immune responses, often superior to what traditional inactivated or subunit vaccines can achieve. This has accelerated their application to a wide array of pathogens and disease targets, from well-established threats like HIV and malaria to emerging infections such as Ebola, Zika, and SARS-CoV-2. The COVID-19 pandemic further highlighted the agility of viral vector platforms, with several adenovirus-based vaccines quickly authorized and deployed on a global scale. Despite these advances, significant challenges remain. One major hurdle is pre-existing immunity against commonly used vector backbones, which can blunt vaccine immunogenicity. Rare but serious adverse events, including vector-associated inflammatory responses and conditions like vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), have raised important safety considerations. Additionally, scaling up manufacturing, ensuring consistency in large-scale production, meeting rigorous regulatory standards, and maintaining equitable global access to these vaccines present profound logistical and ethical dilemmas. In response to these challenges, the field is evolving rapidly. Sophisticated engineering strategies, such as integrase-defective lentiviral vectors, insect-specific flaviviruses, chimeric capsids to evade neutralizing antibodies, and plug-and-play self-amplifying RNA approaches, seek to bolster safety, enhance immunogenicity, circumvent pre-existing immunity, and streamline production. Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic and prior outbreaks are guiding the development of platform-based approaches designed for rapid deployment during future public health emergencies. This review provides an exhaustive, in-depth examination of the historical evolution, immunobiological principles, current platforms, manufacturing complexities, regulatory frameworks, known safety issues, and future directions for viral vector-based vaccines. Full article

This review systematically revises adenovirus (Ad) biology, vector structure, immune responses, and currently available Ad vector COVID-19 vaccines. It analyzes the challenges associated with the Ad vector-based vaccines, including preexisting vector immunity and other side effects. Moreover, this review explores novel and innovative strategies to overcome these constraints for developing next-generation vaccines for broad protection to cover emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants. The future refinement of Ad vaccine platforms will be pivotal in achieving durable immunity against emerging variants for global preparedness. Full article

Platelets, which have been traditionally associated with hemostasis and thrombosis functions, now receive attention for their role in immune responses that may affect vaccine development and effectiveness. Through their interactions with immune cells and modulation of inflammation alongside their role in antigen presentation, platelets become integral components of both innate and adaptive immune systems. New research shows platelets can improve vaccine effectiveness while reducing adverse side effects. During vaccine administration, platelets release cytokines and chemokines, which attract and stimulate immune cells to the injection site. Platelets work together with dendritic cells and T cells to support antigen processing and presentation, which leads to strong immune activation. Platelets’ pro-inflammatory mediators strengthen local immune responses to boost protective immunity generation. Significant attention has been given to platelet involvement in vaccine-related thrombotic events, including vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT). The rarity and severity of these events demonstrate the need to investigate the complex interplay between vaccine mechanisms and platelet activation. Exploration of the platelet-immune axis can lead to new methods for improving both the effectiveness and safety of vaccines. Researchers are working on creating innovative approaches for treatments that target platelet receptors and thrombosis pathways without interfering with the regular hemostatic functions of platelets. New vaccine development methods and personalized immunization strategies can emerge from targeting platelets with adjuvants and immune modulators. Full article

Background: In 2019, a new coronavirus disease emerged in Wuhan, China, known as SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, and caused an ongoing pandemic. Symptomatology of the syndrome is variable, with complications extending to hematopoiesis and hemostasis. Approximately a year after onset of the virus, four vaccination formulas became available to the public, based on a viral vector or mRNA technology. These vaccine formulas have been hampered with hematological complications, like vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) and vaccine-related ITP (immune thrombocytopenic purpura). ITP is a disease with autoimmune pathogenesis characterized by antibody production against platelets and an increased hemorrhagic risk. A decent number of cases have been referred to as possible adverse effects of COVID-19 vaccinations. Case presentation: in this case report, we present two cases of newly diagnosed ITP after vaccination with ChAdOx1-S (AstraZeneca), with a good response to treatment with thrombopoietin-receptor agonists (TPO-RAs). Discussion: we observed an absence of response after corticosteroids and IVIG therapy and a positive therapeutic outcome on TPO-RA. Conclusions: in the ongoing pandemic, there is an urgent need to create therapeutic guidelines for vaccination-related clinical entities and to clarify indications for the vaccination of patients with pre-existing hematological diseases. Full article

Background: Vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a rare but severe complication following vaccination with adenovirus vector-based COVID-19 vaccines. Antibodies directed against platelet factor 4 (PF4) are thought to be responsible for platelet activation and subsequent thromboembolic events in these patients. Since a single vaccination does not lead to sufficient immunization, subsequent vaccinations against COVID-19 have been recommended. However, concerns exist regarding the possible development of a new thromboembolic episode after subsequent vaccinations in VITT patients. Methods: We prospectively analyzed follow-up data from four VITT patients (three women and one man; median age, 44 years [range, 22 to 62 years]) who subsequently received additional COVID-19 vaccines. Platelet counts, anti-PF4/heparin antibody level measurements, and a functional platelet activation assay were performed at each follow-up visit. Additionally, we conducted a literature review and summarized similar reports on the outcome of subsequent vaccinations in patients with VITT. Results: The patients had developed thrombocytopenia and thrombosis 4 to 17 days after the first vaccination with ChAdOx1 nCoV-19. The optical densities (ODs) of anti-PF4/heparin antibodies decreased with time, and three out of four patients tested negative within 4 months. One patient remained positive even after 10 months post first vaccination. All four patients received an mRNA-based vaccine as a second vaccination against SARS-CoV-2. No significant drop in platelet count or new thromboembolic complications were observed during follow-up. We identified seven publications reporting subsequent COVID-19 vaccination in VITT patients. None of the patients developed thrombocytopenia or thrombosis after the subsequent vaccination. Conclusion: Subsequent vaccination with an mRNA vaccine appears to be safe in VITT patients. Full article

In Canada, vaccine safety studies are often conducted at the provincial/territorial level where the primary data on vaccination reside. Combining health services data from multiple jurisdictions using a pooled data analytic approach would reduce the amount of time needed to detect vaccine safety signals. To determine the difference in the time it would take to identify safety signals using different proportions of the Canadian population, we conducted power and sample size calculations for a hypothetical self-controlled case series-based surveillance analysis. We used scenarios modeled after the real-world examples of myocarditis and vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) following COVID-19 vaccination as our base cases. Our calculations demonstrated that in the case of a myocarditis-type event, a pooled analysis would reduce the time needed to detect a safety signal by over 60% compared to using Ontario data alone. In the case of a VITT-type event, a pooled analysis could detect a safety signal 49 days sooner than using Ontario data alone, potentially averting as many as 30 events. Our analysis demonstrates that there is substantial value in using pan-Canadian health services data to evaluate the safety of vaccines. Efforts should be made to develop a pan-Canadian vaccine data source to allow for an earlier evaluation of suspected adverse events following immunization. Full article

The COVID-19 (coronavirus disease) pandemic had a severe impact on public health worldwide. A rare but serious complication after administration of adenoviral vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 (AstraZeneca–Oxford and Johnson & Johnson) is vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT), which can lead to serious complications such as cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST). CVST itself can cause subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and/or intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), leading to high mortality due to herniation of brain parenchyma. In those patients, an emergent decompressive hemicraniectomy (DC) is regularly performed. Herein, the authors want to focus on the patients who survive DC following VITT-associated CVST and shed light on the neurosurgical considerations in those patients. We herein propose a treatment algorithm regarding the timing and the perioperative management of cranioplasty. We describe an exemplary case highlighting that special circumstances may result in a more urgent need for autologous cranioplasty than usual, based on individual risk assessment. Full article

Ad26.COV2.S vaccination can lead to vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT), a rare but severe adverse effect, characterized by thrombocytopenia and thrombosis. The mechanism of VITT induction is unclear and likely multifactorial, potentially including the activation of platelets and endothelial cells mediated by the vaccine-encoded spike protein (S protein). Here, we investigated the biodistribution of the S protein after Ad26.COV2.S dosing in three animal models and in human serum samples. The S protein was transiently present in draining lymph nodes of rabbits after Ad26.COV2.S dosing. The S protein was detected in the serum in all species from 1 day to 21 days after vaccination with Ad26.COV2.S, but it was not detected in platelets, the endothelium lining the blood vessels, or other organs. The S protein S1 and S2 subunits were detected at different ratios and magnitudes after Ad26.COV2.S or COVID-19 mRNA vaccine immunization. However, the S1/S2 ratio did not depend on the Ad26 platform, but on mutation of the furin cleavage site, suggesting that the S1/S2 ratio is not VITT related. Overall, our data suggest that the S-protein biodistribution and kinetics after Ad26.COV2.S dosing are likely not main contributors to the development of VITT, but other S-protein-specific parameters require further investigation. Full article

Platelets play an important role in hemostasis, and a low platelet count usually increases the risk of bleeding. Conditions in which thrombosis occurs despite low platelet counts are referred to as thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome, including heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia, paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, antiphospholipid syndrome, thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA), and disseminated intravascular coagulation. TMA includes thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli-associated hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), and atypical HUS. Patients with these pathologies present with thrombosis and consumptive thrombocytopenia associated with the activation of platelets and the coagulation system. Treatment varies from disease to disease, and many diseases have direct impacts on mortality and organ prognosis if therapeutic interventions are not promptly implemented. Underlying diseases and the results of physical examinations and general laboratory tests as part of a thorough workup for patients should promptly lead to therapeutic intervention before definitive diagnosis. For some diseases, the diagnosis and initial treatment must proceed in parallel. Utilization of not only laboratory tests but also various scoring systems is important for validating therapeutic interventions based on clinical information. Full article

Vaccine-induced thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT) is a rare but severe complication following COVID-19 vaccination, marked by thrombocytopenia and thrombosis. Analogous to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT), VITT shares similarities in anti-platelet factor 4 (PF4) IgG-mediated platelet activation via the FcγRIIa. To investigate the involvement of platelet-antibodies in VITT, we analyzed the presence of platelet-antibodies directed against glycoproteins (GP)IIb/IIIa, GPV and GPIb/IX in the serum of 232 clinically suspected VITT patients determined based on (suspicion of) occurrence of thrombocytopenia and/or thrombosis in relation to COVID-19 vaccination. We found that 19% of clinically suspected VITT patients tested positive for anti-platelet GPs: 39%, 32% and 86% patients tested positive for GPIIb/IIIa, GPV and GPIb/IX, respectively. No HIT-like VITT patients (with thrombocytopenia and thrombosis) tested positive for platelet-antibodies. Therefore, it seems unlikely that platelet-antibodies play a role in HIT-like anti-PF4-mediated VITT. Platelet-antibodies were predominantly associated with the occurrence of thrombocytopenia. We found no association between the type of vaccination (adenoviral vector vaccine versus mRNA vaccine) or different vaccines (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19, Ad26.COV2.S, mRNA-1273, BTN162b2) and the development of platelet-antibodies. It is essential to conduct more research on the pathophysiology of VITT, to improve diagnostic approaches and identify preventive and therapeutic strategies. Full article

Vaccine- induced immune thrombocytopenia and thrombosis (VITT) is a rare adverse event occurring after immunization with adenoviral vector-based vaccines against SARS-CoV-2. This life-threatening condition is characterized by thrombocytopenia, systemic activation of coagulation, and anti-platelet factor 4 antibodies, often resulting in extensive venous thrombosis. Arterial thrombosis is less common and mainly affects the aorta, peripheral arteries, heart, and brain. Several cases of ischemic stroke have been reported in VITT patients, frequently being associated with large vessel occlusion (LVO). Here, we present a case of aggressive VITT in a 46-year-old woman with a past mild SARS-CoV-2 infection, who was admitted with a left-middle cerebral artery (MCA) territory stroke and thrombocytopenia eight days after her first dose of the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine. The patient developed a diffuse arterial thrombosis with concomitant thrombotic events in the intrahepatic portal branches. The patient’s clinical condition worsened rapidly due to a significant enlargement of the ischemic cerebral lesion in the left hemisphere, cerebral herniation, and incipient hydrocephalus requiring decompressive neurosurgery with an unfavorable outcome. Our observations may be indicative of a stroke variant in VITT and highlight the diverse clinical manifestations of the syndrome. Full article

SARS-CoV-2 virulence is known to increase with lowering of environmental temperature and solar ultraviolet radiation; therefore, we have focused our real-world nationwide study concerning with COVID-19 trend and dynamics on the coldest seasons of the year in Italy, the Western country hardest hit at the onset of the pandemic, comparing the autumn–winter of 2020 (before mass vaccination but when the emergency machinery was fully operative in terms of tracing and swabs) with the autumn–winter of 2021 (after mass vaccination), and analyzing the mortality burden by age groups and life stages in the years 2019 (pre-COVID-19), 2020 (before mass vaccination), and 2021 (after mass vaccination). Methods: During the state of national health emergency, the Civil Defense Department released the aggregate data coming from the Higher Institute of Health, the Ministry of Health, the Italian Regions, and the Independent Provinces, to inform the population about the pandemic situation, daily. Among these data, there were the number of contagions, performed swabs, hospitalizations in Intensive Care Units (ICU), non-ICU patients, and deaths. By means of a team effort, we have collected and elaborated all these data, comparing the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy during the autumn–winter of 2020 with the autumn–winter of 2021. Moreover, we have extracted from the database of the National Institute of Statistics the total number of annual deaths in Italy during the years 2019, 2020, and 2021, comparing them to each other in order to evaluate the mortality burden attributable to COVID-19. Results: From the autumn–winter of 2020 to the autumn–winter of 2021, the contagions increased by ≈285%, against a ≈290% increase in the performed swabs; therefore, the mean positivity rate passed from 8.74% before mass vaccination to 8.59% after mass vaccination. The unprecedent vaccination campaign allowed a ≈251% abatement in COVID-19 deaths, and a reduction of ≈224% and ≈228% in daily ICU and non-ICU hospitalizations due to COVID-19, respectively. Regarding COVID-19 deaths, in 2020, there was a mortality excess of ≈14.3% quantifiable in 105,900 more deaths compared to 2019, the pre-COVID-19 year; 103,183 out of 105,900 deaths occurred in older adults (≥60 years), which is equivalent to ≈97.4%, while in adults over 50, the segment of population just below older adults, in 2020, there were 2807 more deaths than in 2019. Surprisingly, from the analysis of our data, it is emerged that in people under the age of 40 in the years 2019, 2020, and 2021, there were 7103, 6808, and 7165 deaths, respectively. This means that in subjects under 40 during 2020, there were 295 fewer deaths than in 2019, while during 2021, there were 357 more deaths than in 2020, equivalent to ≈5.2% more. Conclusions: COVID-19 is a potential life-threatening disease mainly in older adults, as they are the most vulnerable due to inherent immunosenescence and inflammaging. Extensive vaccination in this segment of population with up-to-date vaccines is the means to reduce deaths, hospitalizations, and ICU pressure in the public interest. In the event of future threats, a new mass vaccination campaign should not be implemented without taking into account the individual age; it should primarily be aimed at people over 60 and at patients of any age with immune deficits, and secondly at people over 50. COVID-19 vaccination shows a favorable benefit–risk ratio in older adults, while the balance steps down under the age of 40; this younger segment of the population should be therefore exempt from any mandatory vaccination. Full article