Search Results (1,818)

Background/Objectives: Seasonal influenza imposes a significant burden on pediatric public health. Despite official recommendations and full insurance coverage, vaccination rates among children in Slovakia remain critically low. This study aims to analyze the attitudes, beliefs, and determinants of parental hesitancy regarding childhood influenza vaccination in the post-pandemic context. Methods: A single-center cross-sectional survey was conducted between February and March 2025 using convenience sampling among parents of children attending a pediatric immunoallergology center. An anonymous questionnaire collected data on demographics, risk perception, and attitudes. Data from 301 parents were analyzed using descriptive statistics, chi-squared tests, and odds ratios (OR) to identify key predictors of hesitancy. Results: Only 27.6% of parents expressed willingness to vaccinate their children, while 42.5% were opposed and 29.9% hesitant. Statistical analysis revealed no significant association between parental university education and vaccination intent (p > 0.05), indicating that vaccine hesitancy in this specific setting was present across all educational backgrounds. However, the source of information proved to be a critical determinant: consulting a pediatrician significantly increased the odds of acceptance (OR = 6.32; 95% CI: 3.54–11.28), whereas reliance on the internet and social media was a significant predictor of refusal (OR = 0.29; 95% CI: 0.17–0.50). The primary reported barrier was fear of adverse effects (70.4%), which significantly outweighed doubts about efficacy (30.2%). Conclusions: Parental hesitancy in Slovakia is a widespread phenomenon pervasive across all educational backgrounds, driven primarily by safety concerns and digital misinformation. The contrast between the protective influence of pediatricians and the negative impact of digital media underscores that clinical encounters are currently the most effective firewall against hesitancy. Public health strategies must therefore pivot from general education to empowering pediatricians with active, presumptive communication strategies. Full article

Background/Objectives: Given the critical role of vaccinations and venipunctures in disease prevention and health monitoring, it is concerning that over half of children ages 4 to 8 experience some level of needle fear. Higher levels of fear result in longer procedure times, ineffective pain management, distressing memories of needles, and ultimately, healthcare avoidance. Exposure-based therapy with a therapist is recommended for high levels of fear. However, access is limited due to cost, wait times, clinician shortages, system barriers, and social stigma. Thus, there is a need for an evidence-informed, caregiver-directed educational resource for management of moderate to high needle fear in young children. Methods: To address this gap, such a resource was drafted which included a caregiver guide and an illustrated children’s book. The current objective was to gather key user feedback on this initial version of the resource. Participants reported their perceptions of the content, coping strategies, design, organization, and accessibility of the resource through semi-structured interviews and limited quantitative ratings. Participants were children with moderate to high levels of needle fear (N = 6), their caregivers (N = 6), and healthcare professionals (N = 6; including needle providers, child life specialists, and mental health clinicians). Interviews were coded with inductive content analysis; descriptive statistics were calculated for quantitative ratings. Results: Participants reported satisfaction with the e-resource and highlighted strengths (e.g., CARD^TM system, children’s book) and improvement areas (e.g., length, language). Conclusion: Feedback informed revisions to the e-resource in preparation for further evaluation in a follow-up study. Full article

Background: Men who have sex with men (MSM) using HIV pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) experience a high burden of human papillomavirus (HPV) infection and related diseases, yet data on HPV vaccination among this group in Brazil remain limited. Aims: The aims of this study were to estimate the prevalence of complete HPV vaccination and to identify factors associated with vaccination completion among MSM using PrEP in Brazil. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey between May and September 2025 among MSM aged ≥18 years, residing in Brazil and currently using oral PrEP. Participants were recruited through virtual snowball sampling and targeted advertisements on social media and a gay geosocial networking application. Data were collected using a structured, self-administered questionnaire hosted on REDCap^®. Complete HPV vaccination was defined as self-reported receipt of all doses recommended according to the participant’s age and clinical condition. Sociodemographic characteristics, relationship patterns, sexual behaviors, lubricant use during sexual activity, and history of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) were assessed. Adjusted prevalence ratios (aPRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were estimated using Poisson regression with robust (sandwich) variance. Results: A total of 872 MSM using PrEP were included, of whom 59.4% reported complete HPV vaccination. In adjusted analyses, complete vaccination was more frequent among participants reporting both steady and casual partners (aPR = 1.90; 95% CI: 1.36–2.65) or only casual partners (aPR = 1.72; 95% CI: 1.24–2.39), those reporting lubricant use during sexual activity (aPR = 1.41; 95% CI: 1.23–1.61), and those with a diagnosis of chlamydia and/or gonorrhea in the previous 12 months (aPR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.08–1.36). Conclusions: Although HPV vaccination coverage among MSM using PrEP in Brazil is higher than that reported for MSM in general, it remains incomplete in a population with regular contact with specialized health services. Integrating systematic assessment and delivery of HPV vaccination into PrEP care may help increase vaccination completion and reduce missed opportunities for prevention. Full article

Recognizing cervical cancer as a major public health concern, Romania was among the first EU countries to introduce human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination in 2008. Despite multiple strategies implemented over the past 17 years, HPV vaccine coverage remains one of the lowest in the EU, while cervical cancer mortality rates are among the highest. To explore the underlying factors, we conducted a cross-sectional study involving 209 family physicians at the national level. The study assessed their attitudes, practice, knowledge, and training needs related to HPV vaccination. The majority of physicians (90%) reported that they provide HPV vaccination services, and 88.5% considered themselves to have good and very good knowledge about HPV, which they routinely share during consultations with patients. However, respondents noted that both physician and public attitudes toward HPV vaccination are only moderately positive, which limits vaccine uptake and the success of prevention efforts. Parental hesitation was the main barrier, mentioned by 81.8% of respondents. The majority (71.3%) of doctors indicated that they were able to adequately respond to patients’ questions, but 81.4% of respondents expressed the view that additional training is needed for healthcare professionals on HPV infection and vaccination. These findings highlight the need for coordinated efforts to increase demand and trust in HPV vaccination. Recommended strategies include targeted professional training, public information campaigns, and the development of strong cross-sector partnerships to support vaccination efforts. Full article

Background/Objectives: Despite large-scale measles and rubella (MR) vaccination campaigns in West Africa, measles outbreaks persist, raising concerns about campaign effectiveness, coverage, and underlying determinants. This study assesses the impact of MR follow-up campaigns in 12 of 17 West African countries (2024–2025) and examines the factors contributing to post-campaign outbreaks. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of MR campaigns on measles transmission, identify the characteristics of post-campaign outbreaks, and propose strategies to improve campaign effectiveness and accelerate progress toward measles elimination in West Africa. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional and ecological analytical study to examine spatial and temporal variations based on measles surveillance data from 2024 to 2025, post-campaign coverage surveys (PCCS), district-level outbreak reports, and administrative coverage reports. Trends in measles cases before and after the MMR campaigns were assessed, along with demographic characteristics and spatial analyses of confirmed cases. Results: In 2024, 70.5% (12/17) of countries conducted measles vaccination campaigns, but measles outbreaks increased in 2025 (64 districts in 2024 versus 383 in 2025). Children under five remained the most affected (54%), with 85% of cases being either unvaccinated (57%) or of unknown status (28%). Administrative coverage exceeded 95% in most countries, but measles PCCS revealed gaps, with only Senegal (93%) and Guinea-Bissau (94%) achieving high verified coverage. No country achieved 95% national MPCC. Conclusions: Suboptimal campaign quality, gaps in immunity beyond target age groups, and unreliable administrative data contributed to the persistence of outbreaks. Recommendations include extending Measles vaccination campaigns to older children (5–14 years), improving preparedness by drawing on experiences from other programs such as polio, standardizing PCCS data survey and analysis methodologies across all countries, and integrating Measles vaccination campaigns with other services such as nutrition. Full article

Background/Objectives: Healthcare workers (HCW) in primary care settings play a significant role in recommending vaccines to patients. We aimed to describe COVID-19 vaccination knowledge, attitudes, perception, and practices (KAPP) of HCWs in Tunisia and identify associated factors. Methods: We conducted a national cross-sectional survey (29 January to 3 February 2024) among HCWs in primary public healthcare centers using purposive sampling. Factors associated with good knowledge, positive attitude, and good practice, measured through Likert scales using face-to-face questionnaires, were identified using binary logistic regression. Results: We included 906 HCWs (mean age = 41.87 ± 8.89 years). In total, 37.75% (342/906) of HCWs had good knowledge and perception, 4.30% (39/906) had a positive attitude, and 24.9% (226/906) had good practices related to COVID-19 vaccination. Working in urban compared to rural areas was associated with good knowledge (aOR = 1.57, 95%CI = 1.12–2.21) and positive attitude (aOR = 4.94, 95%CI = 1.19–20.44) to COVID-19 vaccination. Physicians had better KAPP scores than other medical professionals. HCWs working in departments with high-risk patients were more likely to have good knowledge (aOR = 1.28, 95%CI = 1.00–1.72). Positive attitude was also associated with being male (aOR = 2.97, 95%CI = 1.75–5.07) and having at least one non-communicable disease (aOR = 1.92, 95%CI = 1.14–3.23). Being male (aOR = 1.97, 95%CI = 1.35–2.88) and having more years of professional experience (aOR = 1.81, 95%CI = 1.29–2.52) were associated with good practice. Conclusions: Just over a third of HCWs in primary healthcare clinics had good knowledge of COVID-19 vaccination, while positive attitudes and good practices were low. Targeted interventions, particularly for HCWs with less professional experience working in rural settings, are needed to increase good practices and improve COVID-19 vaccination coverage in Tunisia. Full article

Leptospirosis remains a significant public health and economic burden in Southeast Asia, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where environmental, occupational, and socioeconomic factors contribute to its endemicity. Transmission is driven by close interactions between humans and infected animal reservoirs, alongside climatic conditions such as heavy rainfall and flooding. The region’s high but variable seroprevalence reflects inconsistencies in diagnostic methodologies and surveillance systems, complicating disease burden estimation. Major gaps persist in diagnostic capabilities, with current tools often unsuitable for resource-limited settings, leading to underdiagnosis and delayed treatment. Environmental modeling and spatial epidemiology are underutilized due to limited interdisciplinary data integration and predictive capacity. Addressing these challenges requires a One Health approach that integrates human, animal, and environmental health sectors. Key policy recommendations include harmonized surveillance, standardized and validated diagnostics, expanded vaccination programs, improved animal husbandry, and targeted public education. Urban infrastructure improvements and early warning systems are also critical, particularly in disaster-prone areas. Strengthened governance, cross-sectoral collaboration, and investment in research and innovation are essential for sustainable leptospirosis control. Implementing these measures will enhance preparedness, reduce disease transmission, and contribute to improved public health outcomes in all sectors across the region. Full article

Background/Objectives: Vaccination programs are highly effective public health interventions, yet parental hesitancy toward combination vaccines has led to growing demand for alternative vaccination schedules, defined in this study as parental requests to split or replace recommended combination vaccines with single-antigen vaccines for non-clinical reasons. While parental attitudes have been widely studied, little empirical evidence exists on the real-world use of single-antigen vaccines and their public health implications in countries with otherwise high coverage. This study examined the prevalence patterns and parental motivations for requesting such alternative vaccination schedules in Israel, where national guidelines recommend specific combination vaccines, including measles-mumps-rubella-varicella (MMRV) and the pentavalent diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis–inactivated polio–Haemophilus influenzae type b (DTaP+IPV+Hib) vaccines, but informal accommodations exist. Methods: A mixed-methods design was employed: a retrospective cohort analysis of vaccination data from 2018 to 2021 (before and during the COVID-19 pandemic) focused on measles (first dose at 12 months) and pertussis (four-dose primary series), followed by semi-structured interviews with Maternal and Child Health clinic providers, policymakers, and parents. Results: Alternative vaccination schedules involving single-antigen measles or pertussis vaccines are occasionally used despite official policy, accounting for less than 1% of vaccinations overall. Outcomes include delayed administration, lower uptake of combination vaccines, and incomplete protection in certain groups. Parents cited safety concerns, fear of immune overload, and mistrust of authorities. These concerns were often amplified by misinformation, while providers described balancing parental preferences with the need for adequate coverage. Conclusions: This study provides new evidence on how vaccine hesitancy translates into service utilization, highlights the tension between individualized parental decision-making and contribution to collective health, and underscores the need for communication, policy strategies and service designs that sustain high coverage while addressing community-specific concerns. Full article

Introduction: This document presents recommendations of the Polish Respiratory Society on discharge instructions following hospitalization for an exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Methods: The Delphi method was applied to achieve consensus among independent experts. Results: Fourteen recommendations were formulated. Experts emphasized that discharge summaries require clear graphical and editorial design to ensure readability for both patients and healthcare professionals. The involvement of a multidisciplinary team was recommended to provide coherent and comprehensive documentation. Discharge instructions should be discussed with the patient during hospitalization and supplemented with standardized educational materials provided separately. These materials should cover inhaler technique, smoking cessation, physical activity, pulmonary rehabilitation, and vaccination. For patients with respiratory failure, home oxygen therapy or non-invasive ventilation must be addressed. Discharge recommendations should highlight modifications in baseline COPD treatment and management of comorbidities. A personalized action plan for future exacerbations is essential, and dietary consultation is advised. Finally, discharge summaries should specify follow-up appointments and include prescriptions for inhaled medications. Conclusions: The Polish Respiratory Society recommends that discharge instructions be provided to all patients hospitalized for a COPD exacerbation. Full article

Cervical cancer remains the fourth most common malignancy among women worldwide. Despite well-developed prevention measures, incidence and mortality continue to rise, especially in low- and middle-income countries due to low screening coverage and unavailability of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination. The cervical cancer screening coverage could be improved by the implementation of a self-sampling modality for HPV testing. Multiple research pieces support the validity and reliability of a self-sampling modality as an alternative approach to clinician-collected samples for primary cervical cancer screening via HPV genotyping. Moreover, growing research evidence on the self-sampling modality reception shows high acceptance of the method among screened populations. Studies on the self-sampling approach economic efficiency also revealed a high cost-effectiveness of HPV testing through a self-sampling modality compared to other screening modalities for cervical cancer. It is specifically important for low-resource settings, which should use the self-sampling cost advantages to improve cervical cancer screening coverage by attracting underscreened populations. Overall, self-sampling modality has a higher participation rate and better patient satisfaction reported; thus, the method is highly recommended by the World Health Organization for cervical cancer screening. Full article

Background/Objectives: Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the most common cause of lower respiratory tract infection in young children, especially during infancy, resulting in substantial morbidity and mortality. Methods: Acknowledging the real-world evidence on RSV immunization, the College of Pediatrics, Academy of Medicine of Malaysia, has appointed an expert panel to develop a position paper on recommendations for infant and/or maternal vaccination against childhood RSV, specifically in the Malaysian context with year-round RSV activity. Results: Recognizing the potential constraints and limitations in the implementation process, the expert panel recommends targeted immunization with long-acting RSV monoclonal antibody (mAb) for high-risk infants as a pragmatic first step, with subsequent scale-up to universal immunization of infants when resources permit. Conclusions: Immunization is the most effective strategy to prevent RSV-related lower respiratory tract infection in childhood. Year-round maternal vaccination between 28 and 36 weeks’ gestation, combined with immunization at six months for all infants, may potentially circumvent the unclear seasonality. Full article

Background: Cervical cancer is associated with Human Papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Besides cervical cancer, oro-pharyngo-laryngeal or uro-genital cancers are also reported. The HPV vaccine has been strongly recommended for school age children. However, the parents’ or guardians’ hesitancy remains. Methods: This is a mixed-method study in which the parents or guardians of school children, aged 10–18 years, were enrolled voluntarily. Their general demographic data, knowledge, attitudes, and awareness of vaccine accessibility, healthcare cost entitlement of the children, types of school affiliation, education administration areas where the schools were located, and the presence of a healthcare professional in family were analyzed by multiple logistic regression analysis adjusted with all studied variables to define the significant associated factors with the parents’ or guardians’ HPV vaccine acceptance (p < 0.05). In-depth interviews were subsequently performed with the selected participants until the qualitative data were saturated. Thematic analysis was applied, and the results of the two study methods were integrated to explore the reasons for vaccine acceptance or hesitancy. Results: A total of 943 questionnaire respondents were enrolled, among whom 75.8% were female and 86.4% were parents. A total of 663 (70.3%) participants accepted the HPV vaccine. Parents’ or guardians’ knowledge and attitudes, awareness of vaccine accessibility, type of school affiliation, the children’s healthcare cost entitlement, and the presence of a healthcare professional in the family were significantly associated with vaccine acceptance in the multivariate analysis (p < 0.05). The qualitative study revealed that misunderstanding of the vaccine’s safety and benefits combined with inadequate reliable information sources were associated factors with HPV vaccine hesitancy among the parents or guardians. Conclusions: Providing clear-cut knowledge about the HPV vaccine benefit vs. risk and clearing financial barriers for the parents or guardians of school children are advocated. Full article

Background: Vaccinations are essential to protect travelers from infectious diseases, especially in high-risk destinations. However, awareness and adherence to vaccination recommendations vary, influenced by communication, personal beliefs, and behavior. Methods: A focus group was conducted in February 2025 at a local health authority in central Italy, specifically within its travel clinic, to explore travelers’ awareness, attitudes, and behaviors regarding vaccination. The discussion was analyzed using the “3Cs” Vaccine Hesitancy model. Participants were purposively selected to ensure diversity and representativeness. Discussions included past travel experiences, knowledge of required vaccines, motivations for immunization, and barriers to access. Results: Four key thematic areas emerged: socio-cultural/environmental factors, psychological/emotional influences, knowledge/information access, and general health perceptions. Communication gaps often weakened belief in vaccine efficacy and necessity. Cultural background, past experiences, and risk perception heavily influenced decisions. Discussion: Although vaccination is widely viewed as a protective measure, vaccine hesitancy persists due to misinformation and limited institutional trust. The COVID-19 pandemic intensified both awareness and skepticism. The 3Cs model clarified hesitancy levels and barriers, emphasizing the need for effective communication and trust-building. Conclusions: Enhancing access to accurate information, strengthening healthcare professionals’ communicative role, and reducing economic obstacles are crucial. Tailored awareness campaigns and integrated health policies are essential to increasing vaccine uptake, safeguarding traveler health, and limiting global disease spread. Patient or Public Contribution: Members of the public contributed to this study by participating in a focus group, where they shared their personal experiences, perceptions, and opinions regarding travel-related vaccinations. Their insights provided valuable qualitative data that helped inform the study’s findings. However, they were not involved in the study design, the analysis of the data, or the preparation of the manuscript. The role of participants was limited to the data collection phase of the study. Full article

Background: Some patients suffer from persistent symptoms following a COVID-19 infection, referred to as long COVID. The aims of the study were to estimate the prevalence of long COVID and study its determinants in Tunisia. Methods: We conducted a nationwide cross-sectional study among a representative sample of COVID-19 survivors residing in Tunisia between June and August 2022. We selected a random sample, stratified by age and region, among residents registered in the national surveillance database with a SARS-CoV-2 positive test taken from September 2020 to September 2021 (n = 479,743). The expected sample size was 384. We defined a patient with long COVID as having at least one self-reported symptom persisting for more than four weeks after the first confirmation of SARS-CoV-2 infection (RT-PCR or Ag-RDT) and not explained by an alternative diagnosis. Trained healthcare workers interviewed consenting respondents by phone using a structured questionnaire. We described continuous variables using median and interquartile range (IQR). We measured the prevalence of long COVID and its 95% confidence interval (95% CI). We estimated the association between explanatory variables (socio-demographic, lifestyle and comorbidities, SARS-CoV-2 history infection, COVID-19 vaccination status) and long COVID using a log-binomial model, reporting adjusted prevalence ratios (a-PR) and its 95% CI. Results: Of 1094 persons contacted, 416 were enrolled (response rate: 38%). Long-COVID prevalence was 64% (267/416); 95% CI [59–69%]. The sex ratio (M:F) was 0.72. Age ranged from 1 to 101 years, with a median of 41 years (IQR:31–55 years). The most common symptoms were fatigue (63%), myalgia/arthralgia (33%), and cognitive symptoms (52%). Median duration of long-COVID symptoms was 11 months (IQR: 3–14 months). In multivariate analysis, experiencing acute COVID-19 (a-PR = 1.5; 95% CI [1.0–2.1]), being a woman of childbearing age (a-PR = 1.2; 95% CI [1.0–1.4]) and residing in the central region (a-PR = 1.5; 95% CI [1.1–2.0]) were significantly associated with a higher prevalence of long COVID. Conclusions: Long COVID is prevalent in Tunisia affecting patients with multiple symptoms initially, those residing in the central region and young women. We recommend to enhance healthcare access and medical follow-up both during and after the infection, focusing on identified risk groups. We also recommend to conduct further research to optimize management of long-COVID patients. Full article

Background: Pre-exposure passive immune prophylaxis (PrEP) might contribute to improve hematologic malignancy (HM) outcomes; however, there are currently no specific guidelines to inform patient selection. Methods: A literature review and a Delphi consensus process were used to identify COVID-19 risk factors, critical COVID-19 outcomes, and efficacy of PrEP against SARS-CoV-2 in HMs. An analytic hierarchy process was used to assign a priority score to candidate outcomes and to determine the PrEP indications. For these decisions, the experts assumed adequate compliance with anti-COVID-19 vaccination and acknowledged the effectiveness of PrEP in reducing SARS-CoV-2-related mortality and hospital admissions. Results: Based on the literature review, the expert panel identified 80 risk categories among patients with HM and prioritized eight clinical outcomes related to SARS-CoV-2 PrEP. The highest mean priority scores were observed for HM-related mortality (7.0), intensive care unit admission (6.7), and delays in anti-HM treatment (6.6). Based on such a framework, the experts deemed that if there was a variant-specific PrEP promptly available, it would be considered mandatory for all candidates receiving allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, CAR-T therapy, or bispecific antibodies, regardless of local viral epidemiology. During epidemiological waves, variant-specific PrEP would also be recommended for patients with HMs at high risk of unfavorable COVID-19 clinical outcomes. Conclusions: This study identified PrEP indications for patients with HM receiving appropriate active immunization against COVID-19. Full article