Search Results (23)

Multiple myeloma (MM) is predominantly a disease of the elderly. In recent years, a surge of highly effective plasma cell therapies has revolutionized the care of elderly multiple myeloma (MM) patients, for whom frailty and age-related competing causes of mortality determine management. Traditionally, the treatment of newly diagnosed elderly patients has centered on doublet or triplet combinations composed of immunomodulators (IMIDs), proteasome inhibitors (PIs), anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs), and corticosteroids producing median progression-free survival (PFS) rates between 34 and 62 months. However, recently, a series of large phase III clinical trials examining quadruplet regimens of PIs, IMIDs, corticosteroids, and anti-CD38 mAbs have shown exceptional outcomes, with median PFS exceeding 60 months, albeit with higher rates of peripheral neuropathy (≥Grade 2: 27% vs. 10%) when PIs and IMIDs are combined, and infections (≥Grade 3: 40% vs. 29–41%) with the addition of anti-CD38mAbs. The development of T-cell redirecting therapies including T-cell engagers (TCEs) and CAR-T cells has further expanded the therapeutic arsenal. TCEs have shown exceptional activity in relapsed disease and are being explored in the newly diagnosed setting with promising early results. However, concerns remain regarding the logistical challenges of step-up dosing, which often necessitates inpatient admission, the infectious risks, and the financial burden associated with TCEs in elderly patients. CAR-T, the most potent commercially available therapy for MM, offers the potential of a ‘one and done’ approach. However, its application to elderly patients has been tempered by significant concerns of cytokine release syndrome, early and delayed neurological toxicity, and its overall tolerability in frail patients. Robust data in frail patients are still needed. How CAR-T and TCEs will be sequenced among the growing therapeutic armamentarium for elderly MM patients remains to be determined. This review explores the safety, efficacy, cost, and logistical barriers associated with the above treatments in elderly MM patients. Full article

Background: Recently, the addition of anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to standard first-line triplet regimens, including a proteasome inhibitor (PI), an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) and dexamethasone, has led to the introduction of quadruplets in clinical practice. Methods: A systematic search was conducted (end-of-search: 9 November, 2024) for clinical trials investigating first-line anti-CD38 mAb-based quadruplets in combination with a PI and an IMiD. Pooled proportions and effect-estimates along with 95% confidence intervals were calculated with common-effect and random-effects models and further subgroup and meta-regression analyses were performed. Results: The pooled 2-, 3- and 4-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 89%, 77% and 86%, respectively. Furthermore, patients treated with quadruplets demonstrated a 46% reduced risk for disease progression or death (HR = 0.54, 95% CI: 0.46–0.64) compared to those on triplets. Overall survival (OS) rates were consistently high, ranging from 83% to 96% between different regimens. High rates of deep responses that deepened over time were observed, with the pooled proportion of patients achieving at least complete response being 64%. Importantly, the pooled MRD negativity rate was 62%, whereas patients treated with quadruplet first-line therapy had 2.5 times the odds to be MRD negative at any point compared with those on triplets. Moreover, the odds for sustained 12-month MRD negativity were thrice as much with quadruplets compared to triplets. Finally, while no increase in serious adverse events was observed with quadruplet regimens compared to triplets, a 46% statistically significant increased risk for grade 3–4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was observed, along with a 14% increased risk for grade 3–4 infections. Conclusions: The addition of anti-CD38 mAbs to standard triplet regimens has shown particularly favorable outcomes, supporting their integration in the upfront treatment of patients with NDMM. However, close monitoring for hematological toxicity and infections is essential. Full article

Treatment for relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) is complex, with several classes of drugs that can be combined into doublet, triplet, or quadruplet regimens. Real-world studies can help to determine the optimal treatment sequences and dosing through observed usage of drugs outside of clinical trials. Previous clinical trials have demonstrated high rates of durable responses in the treatment of patients with triple-class-exposed RRMM with regimens containing selinexor, a first-in-class, orally available selective exportin 1 inhibitor. This study analyzed real-world treatment patterns and survival outcomes using a nationwide electronic health record-derived, deidentified database of patients with RRMM treated with an eligible selinexor-containing, triplet-based regimen, including combinations with dexamethasone and pomalidomide, bortezomib, carfilzomib, or daratumumab. Patients had a real-world overall survival (rwOS) of 14.7 months (95% CI: 10.6, 20.9) and a derived progression-free survival (dPFS) of 4.7 months (95% CI: 3.4, 6.7). Patients with previous exposure to anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) in the most recent regimen prior to the selinexor treatment had numerically higher survival outcomes (rwOS, 20.9; dPFS, 8.7 months). These data suggest that, in the real-world setting, the use of selinexor triplet regimens is effective in patients with RRMM, especially those with prior exposure to an anti-CD38 mAb in the immediate prior line of therapy. Full article

Multiple myeloma (MM), the second most common hematologic cancer, remains an incurable malignancy, characterized by an initial response to therapy followed by successive relapses. The upfront treatment typically involves induction therapy, autologous stem cell transplantation for eligible patients, and long-term maintenance therapy. It is important to note that the anticipated duration of myeloma response diminishes with each subsequent relapse. Therefore, the first relapse represents a critical juncture in treatment, where refractoriness to key drug classes emerges as a significant challenge. Addressing the optimal management in this setting requires careful consideration of disease biology, prior therapies, and patient-specific factors to optimize outcomes. Cilta-cel, a chimeric antigen receptor T-cell construct, has emerged as the most promising therapeutic option at first relapse, resulting in long-term remissions with a significant treatment-free interval. However, availability and accessibility are not universal and treatment logistics are complex. Triplet regimens based on carfilzomib, pomalidomide or selinexor, remain the cornerstone of treatment at first relapse, whereas the optimal combination is based on refractoriness to prior drugs, especially anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies and lenalidomide, and patient comorbidities. With the rapidly expanding therapeutic landscape, clinicians face increasing complexity in selecting the most appropriate regimens for individual patients. This review aims to guide clinicians through these evolving options by consolidating evidence-based strategies and highlighting emerging therapies, ensuring a personalized approach to managing first-relapse MM. Full article

Background/Objectives: BRAF mutations occur in 5–10% of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) cases, but their implications for prognosis and optimal treatment remain unclear. Methods: This multicenter, prospective observational study analyzed 377 RAS wild-type cases from 511 patients across 32 centers, using PCR-based methods. Results: BRAF mutations were identified in 21% (79/377) of cases, predominantly V600E (89.9%) with a minority of non-V600E (10.1%). Microsatellite instability (MSI) testing revealed MSI-high in 11.3%, exclusively among V600E cases. V600E mutations were linked to right-sided tumors, poor differentiation, and elevated CA19-9 levels. Median survival was significantly lower in V600E cases compared to BRAF wild-type (12.4 vs. 37.5 months, HR 3.25, p < 0.001) and marginally lower non-V600E cases (12.4 vs. 34.7 months, HR 0.61, p = 0.057). Chemotherapy regimens (doublet vs. triplet) and targeted treatments (bevacizumab vs. anti-EGFR) showed no significant survival differences in V600E patients. Similarly, RAS/BRAF wild-type patients had comparable survival with bevacizumab versus anti-EGFR, even for left-sided tumors. Conclusions: These findings highlight distinct clinical and prognostic profiles for BRAF V600E and non-V600E mutations, while treatment choice appears to have limited impact on survival in these subgroups or RAS/BRAF wild-type cases. Full article

Background/Objectives: Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is mainly treated with 5-Fluoro-Uracil (5-FU), Oxaliplatin and Irinotecan chemotherapies and anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) or anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) targeted therapies. Due to chemotherapy-related toxicity, patients receive induction treatment to achieve tumour response followed by maintenance therapy with less cytotoxic molecules or a chemotherapy-free interval to reduce chemotherapy-related toxicity. In this study, the aim was to determine the patient, cancer and treatment factors that influence the duration of maintenance therapy (DMT). Methods: We collected retrospective data on a cohort of 133 patients treated at the Centre Georges François Leclerc (CGFL) cancer centre in Dijon between March 2014 and June 2022. Patients had unresectable or potentially resectable diseases. They received first-line induction treatment with chemotherapy and/or targeted therapy and maintenance treatment, defined as the interruption of at least one chemotherapy agent. Results: In the multivariate analysis, age (HR: 1.02, 95% CI 1.00–1.04, p = 0.031), N2 nodal status (HR: 1.78, 95% CI 1.09–2.89, p = 0.021) and the presence of peritoneal metastases (HR: 2.05, 95% CI 1.25–3.36, p = 0.004), as well as baseline carcino-embryonic antigen (CEA) level (HR: 1.10, 95% CI 1.00–1.20, p = 0.052), were significantly associated to poor DMT. Local treatment of liver metastases also significantly reduced the DMT (HR: 0.49, 95% CI 0.28–0.86, p = 0.013). In our cohort, induction triplet chemotherapy significantly increased the CEA delta (70% vs. 44%, p = 0.047) compared to doublet chemotherapy and led to a higher rate of liver surgery (40% vs. 21%, p = 0.014) and a trend for a higher rate of local treatment of metastases (62% vs. 45%, p = 0.059). Conclusions: Duration of maintenance therapy is determined by the initial patient and colorectal cancer characteristics. However, it is significantly increased by local treatment of liver metastases. By reducing the tumour burden, a triplet induction chemotherapy regimen increases the rate of liver metastase resection. Full article

Background/Objectives: Patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who relapse after exposure to lenalidomide in the context of their first-line therapy are becoming a growing and clinically relevant population. We performed a systematic review of available clinical trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of different therapeutic strategies for the treatment of patients with MM at first relapse after the frontline use of lenalidomide. Methods: Publications of interest were searched on the PubMed database. The following search terms were employed: relapsed multiple myeloma, refractory multiple myeloma, first relapse, second-line therapy, lenalidomide-refractory (Len-R) and lenalidomide-exposed (Len-Exp). Results: Overall, triplet regimens that included anti-CD38 antibodies, carfilzomib and dexamethasone achieved a more favorable PFS regardless of the number of prior therapies. Other trials also demonstrated a non-negligible benefit with combinations containing pomalidomide, particularly in early lines of therapy. However, the variable number of patients with Len-Exp/Len-R disease enrolled in these studies and the limited number of those analyzed after progression following frontline lenalidomide make it difficult to select an “optimal” choice for the treatment of patients with MM at first relapse. Promising results have been more recently obtained by using combo therapies, including belantamab mafodotin and, above all, immunotherapies with CAR-T cells, and ongoing clinical trials are exploring the role of bispecific antibodies and CELMoDs in this population of patients. Conclusions: In the absence of clear-cut data regarding the specific effects of available regimens on patients with MM who are refractory or have relapsed after first-line therapies including lenalidomide, novel approaches based on different types of immune strategies are expected to further improve the clinical outcome of these patients. Full article

Background: Data on the outcome of octogenarian multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts), especially if treated outside clinical studies, are scanty. Aims and Methods: MM pts ≥ 80 years, treated at TASMC with first-line therapy between 2010 and 2023, were reviewed. Characteristics and outcomes were analyzed. Results: A total number of 101 pts, of whom 54 were males with a median age of 84 years (80–98), were included. Among them, 67.4% had a Charlson comorbidity index of ≥5, 37% had ISS-3 (International staging system) and 20% had Revised-ISS-3. In our study, 44.5% received doublets and 50.5% received triplets/quadruplets. A bortezomib-based regimen was applied in 87%, and IMiDs were used in 27.7%. Despite an upfront employment of a low lenalidomide dose, dose reductions were required in 48%. Grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AEs) (mainly infections) were documented in 36.6% of patients, including grade 5 events in 9%, all attributed to infections. The overall response rate was 69%, including 31% ≥ VGPRs (Very good partial response). Sixty-seven percent (67%) received second-line therapy, administered within a median period of 12 months (1–84). Within a median follow-up period of 36 m (1–141), the median overall survival (OS) approached 42 m (range: 1–141); being shorter in pts > 84 years (HR = 1.7, p = 0.03), pts with lung disease (HR = 1.8, p = 0.044) and pts with ISS = 3 and R-ISS = 3 (HR = 1.65, p = 0.0016 and HR = 2.45, p = 0.006, respectively); Conclusions: Octogenarians treated outside clinical studies often have a lower tolerance to treatment. Nevertheless, upfront administration of low doses of anti-MM agents provided a response in the majority of patients, translated into impressive OS. Nevertheless, mortality due to AEs was high, emphasizing the need for new, “octogenarian-oriented” treatment protocols. Full article

Background: Prior preclinical studies showed promising antitumor activity and an acceptable safety profile associated with radiopharmaceuticals for patients with metastatic, persistent, or recurrent uterine cervix cancers. Whether the addition of a radiopharmaceutical to chemotherapy would significantly increase progression-free survival in such patients is untested. Our retrospective study sought to associate the line of treatment and progression-free survival as benchmarks for next-generation radiopharmaceutical development. Methods: We grouped metastatic, persistent, or recurrent uterine cervix cancer patients not amenable to curable surgery or radiotherapy between 2002 and 2023 by the line of doublet, triplet, and quadruplet chemotherapy or another intervention. After the first-line treatment, patients were monitored for radiographic progression every three months for up to three years. The primary endpoints were the first and any second or third progression-free survival intervals. Results: A total of 127 patients contributed demographic, tumor, line of treatment, and outcome data with a median follow-up of 18 months (25–75% interquartile range: 9 to 37 months). After the first-line treatment, 113 patients had local or distant progression or died from any cause, most often death from the disease (67%). Median progression-free survivals were 5.5 months (95% confidence interval: 4.8–6.0 months), 5.3 months (95% confidence interval: 4.5–6.3 months), and 3.0 months (95% confidence interval: 2.1–3.7 months) for the first-, second-, and third-line treatments, respectively. For a first-line cisplatin-containing regimen, the median progression-free survival was 6.5 months (95% confidence interval: 5.5–7.7 months). Conclusions: This study highlights the limited efficacy of current treatments for metastatic, persistent, or recurrent uterine cancer patients. A five-month progression-free survival might serve as a benchmark for the development of novel therapies in clinical efficacy trials, such as radiopharmaceuticals. Full article

The use of 4-drug induction regimens for treatment naïve newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) is associated with improved depth of response and progression-free survival (PFS). However, head-to-head trials of 4-drug combinations are lacking, and instead, these regimens are typically compared to 3-drug backbones; limiting the ability to discern whether any additional benefit (or toxicity) is simply additive or represents a synergy (or interaction). We conducted a meta-analysis of phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials that randomized treatment naïve NDMM patients to either a 4-drug or 3-drug induction regimen. We included 11 trials which represented 6509 unique patients. PFS for all trials in the meta-analysis was 54 months with a 4-drug induction and 8.9 months with a 3-drug induction (HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.45; 0.54), but there was no benefit to using a 4-drug induction that did not include an anti-CD38 antibody (PFS 4-drug 8.1 months, PFS 3-drug 8.0 months; HR 0.95; 95% CI 0.86; 1.06). Adverse events were more frequent with the quadruplet regimens but were predominately mild. High-grade (≥3) adverse events (AEs) that were more common with 4-drug regimens were infections (RR: 1.34; 95% CI 1.17; 1.54) and thrombocytopenia (RR: 1.39; 95% CI 1.12; 1.74). This study suggests that 4-drug induction regimens which include an anti-CD38 antibody improve efficacy although with additional toxicity in NDMM patients. Full article

Emerging evidence has shown remarkable advances in the multimodal treatment of esophageal squamous-cell carcinoma. Despite these advances, the oncological outcomes for advanced esophageal cancer remain controversial due to the frequent observation of local recurrence in the regional or other lymph nodes and distant metastasis after curative treatment. For cases of locoregional recurrence in the cervical lymph nodes alone, salvage surgery with lymph node dissection generally provides a good prognosis. However, if recurrence occurs in multiple regions, the oncological efficacy of surgery may be limited. Radiotherapy/chemoradiotherapy can be employed for unresectable or recurrent cases, as well as for selected cases in neo- or adjuvant settings. Dose escalation and toxicity are potential issues with conventional three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy; however, more precise therapeutic efficacy can be obtained using technical modifications with improved targeting and conformality, or with the use of proton beam therapy. The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors, including pembrolizumab or nivolumab, in addition to chemotherapy, has been shown to improve the overall survival in unresectable, advanced/recurrent cases. For patients with lymph node recurrence in multiple regions, chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil [5-FU] plus cisplatin) and combination therapy with nivolumab and ipilimumab have shown comparable oncological efficacy. Further prospective studies are needed to improve the treatment outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer with locoregional recurrence. Full article

Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) is a novel strategy for rectal cancer that administers both (chemo)radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy before surgery. TNT is expected to improve treatment compliance, tumor regression, organ preservation, and oncologic outcomes. Multiple TNT regimens are currently available with various combinations of the treatments including induction or consolidation chemotherapy, triplet or doublet chemotherapy, and long-course chemoradiotherapy or short-course radiotherapy. Evidence on TNT is rapidly evolving with new data on clinical trials, and no definitive consensus has been established on which regimens to use for improving outcomes. Clinicians need to understand the advantages and limitations of the available regimens for multidisciplinary decision making. This article reviews currently available evidence on TNT for rectal cancer. A decision making flow chart is provided for tailor-made use of TNT regimens based on tumor location and local and systemic risk. Full article

High-dose melphalan (HDM) plus autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) remains a standard-of-care treatment approach for eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) based on demonstrated superiority in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) versus nontransplant approaches. Very high rates of minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative responses are also being seen with novel triplet and quadruplet induction regimens plus HDM-ASCT. However, recent clinical trials have shown no overall survival benefit with transplant versus nontransplant approaches. Furthermore, HDM is associated with several important downsides, including acute and long-term toxicities, transient decreases in quality of life, the need for hospitalization, an increased mutational burden at relapse, and an elevated risk of second primary malignancies. In this context, given the highly heterogeneous nature of MM in the NDMM patient population, as well as the continued emergence of novel agents and treatment approaches, there is an increasing rationale for considering deferred HDM-ASCT approaches in selected patients. Approaches under investigation include MRD-adapted therapy and the use of novel immune-based therapies as alternatives to HDM-ASCT. Ongoing developments in understanding the pathobiology and prognostic factors in NDMM, plus immune profiling and routine MRD evaluation, will result in novel, HDM-sparing treatment paradigms, enabling further improvement in patient outcomes. Full article

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second-leading cause of cancer-related deaths globally. BRAF mutation is present in about 10% of CRC patients and is associated with a poor response to chemotherapy. These patients have a relatively poor prognosis. This review aims to assess the efficacy and safety of BRAF inhibitors in BRAF-mutated CRC patients. A literature search was performed on PubMed and Embase, and clinical trials relevant to BRAF inhibitors in CRC were included. Data were extracted for efficacy and safety variables. Two randomized clinical trials (n = 765) and eight non-randomized trials (n = 281) were included based on inclusion criteria. In RCTs, an overall response was reported in 23% of the patients treated with BRAF inhibitor-based regimens compared to 2.5% with control regimens. The hazard ratio of overall survival was also significantly better with triplet encorafenib therapy at 0.52 (95% CI = 0.39–0.70). In single-arm trials, ORR was 17% and 34% in two-drug and three-drug regimens, respectively. BRAF inhibitor-based regimens were safe and effective in the treatment of BRAF-mutated CRC. Large-scale randomized trials are needed to find a suitable population for each regimen. PROSPERO registration No. CRD42023471627. Full article

The standards of care for the initial treatment of patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who are eligible for high-dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation (HDM-ASCT) include highly active triplet and quadruplet regimens based on proteasome inhibitors, immunomodulatory drugs, and monoclonal antibodies. These regimens are resulting in improved outcomes and increasingly high rates of minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative responses without HDM-ASCT as part of the upfront therapy. Furthermore, recent randomized studies have shown that, while transplant-based approaches as a frontline therapy result in significantly longer progression-free survival compared to non-transplant approaches, this has not translated into an overall survival benefit. Given these developments, and in the context of the treatment burden of undergoing HDM-ASCT, in addition to the acute toxicities and long-term sequelae of HDM, which are associated with the genotoxicity of melphalan, there is an increasing rationale for considering deferring upfront HDM-ASCT in select transplant-eligible patients and saving it as a treatment option for later salvage therapy. Here, we review the latest clinical trial data on upfront or deferred HDM-ASCT and on the activity of quadruplet induction regimens, including rates of MRD-negative responses, and summarize emerging treatment approaches in the upfront setting such as the use of MRD-directed therapy and alternatives to HDM-ASCT. Full article