Search Results (308)

The SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, through its receptor binding domain (S1-RBD), binds to the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor on the host cell membrane, leading to viral infection. Several mutations in S1-RBD in SARS-CoV-2 variants are known to enhance infection through an increased affinity for ACE2. While many reports are available describing the SARS-CoV-2 infection mechanism, there is a dearth of studies towards understanding the initial interaction of the S1-RBD with ACE2 on living host cells and the role of endocytosis and cytoskeleton in the process. Here, we reconstituted the interaction between S1-RBD- and ACE2-expressing host cells in a hybrid live cell-supported lipid bilayer (SLB) platform enabling live monitoring of the interaction between S1-RBD on SLBs and the ACE2 receptor on living cells and showed that cells depleted Omicron S1-RBD from SLB corrals, likely through endocytosis. Specifically, interaction of living host cells with S1-RBD-functionalized SLB substrates resulted in the enrichment of S1-RBD and ACE2 at the cell–SLB interface. Interaction of host cells with wild type (WT), Omicron, and Omicron Revertant S1-RBD functionalized on micron-scale SLB corrals, which mimic viral membranes but are flat, also resulted in their enrichment. However, cells interacting with Omicron S1-RBD revealed a depletion of the protein from many corrals, which was generally not observed with the WT S1-RBD and was reduced with the Omicron Revertant, which contains the Q493R mutation reversion, S1-RBD. Further, S1-RBD depletion coincided with the localization of the early endosomal marker EEA1. Importantly, treatment of cells with the clathrin inhibitor, pitstop 2, but not the myosin II inhibitor, blebbistatin, significantly reduced Omicron S1-RBD depletion. Collectively, these observations suggest that the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant has evolved, through mutations in its S1-RBD, to take advantage of the cellular endocytic pathway for enhanced infection, which is not observed with the parental SARS-CoV-2 and appears to be lost in the Omicron Revertant variant. Additionally, these results underscore the significance of the hybrid live cell–SLB platform in studying SARS-CoV-2 S1-RBD-ACE2 interaction and the potential impact of mutations in the S1-RBD on adapting to a specific cellular entry mechanism. Full article

Testing medical countermeasures for SARS-CoV-2 transmission using vertebrates can be hindered by legislation regulating animal experimentation, high costs, and ethical concerns. To overcome these challenges, we propose a new Caenorhabditis elegans strain that constitutively expresses the human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor (ACE2). This resulted in significant impairment of reproduction and a defect in pharyngeal function compared to wild-type (WT) worms. SARS-CoV-2 infection was simulated by treating worms with the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the spike protein, which caused dose-dependent and time-dependent pharyngeal impairment in ACE2 worms but not in WT worms. The toxicity of RBD was prevented by administering an anti-human ACE2 antibody, demonstrating that interactions with the ACE2 receptor are essential. The ACE2-expressing worm strain was further used for pharmacological research with Raloxifene. In vitro, 1–3 μM of Raloxifene reduced the entry of lentiviral particles carrying the Wuhan variant and B.1.1.7 UK and B.1.1.529 Omicron strains into HEK293-ACE2, in addition to particles expressing N501Y-mutated or P681H-mutated spike proteins. Raloxifene (0.1–1 μM) completely counteracted RBD toxicity in ACE2 worms, indicating that this strain offers a cost-effective in vivo screening platform for molecules with effects involving interactions with the ACE2 receptor. Full article

Despite numerous research efforts and several effective vaccines and therapies developed against coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), drug repurposing remains an attractive alternative approach for treatment of SARS-CoV-2 variants and other viral infections that may emerge in the future. Cellular polyamines support viral propagation and tumor growth. Here we tested the antiviral activity of two polyamine metabolism-targeting drugs, an irreversible inhibitor of polyamine biosynthesis, α-difluoromethylornithine (DFMO), and a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), Sulindac, which have been previously evaluated for colon cancer chemoprevention. The drugs were tested as single agents and in combination in the human Calu-3 lung adenocarcinoma and Caco-2 colon adenocarcinoma cell lines and the K18-hACE2 transgenic mouse model of severe COVID-19. In the infected human cell lines, the DFMO/Sulindac combination significantly suppressed SARS-CoV-2 N1 Nucleocapsid mRNA by interacting synergistically when cells were pretreated with drugs and additively when treatment was applied to the infected cells. The Sulindac alone and DFMO/Sulindac combination treatments also suppressed the expression of the viral Spike protein and the host angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2). In K18-hACE2 mice, the antiviral activity of DFMO and Sulindac as single agents and in combination was tested as prophylaxis (drug supplementation started 7 days before infection) or as treatment (drug supplementation started 24 h post-infection) at the doses equivalent to patient chemoprevention trials (835 ppm DFMO and 167 ppm Sulindac). The drugs’ antiviral activity in vivo was evaluated by measuring the clinical (survival rates and clinical scores), viral (viral load and virus infectivity), and biochemical (plasma polyamine, Sulindac, and Sulindac metabolite levels) endpoints. Prophylaxis with DFMO and Sulindac as single agents significantly increased survival rates in the young male mice (p = 0.01 and p = 0.027, respectively), and the combination was effective in the aged male mice (p = 0.042). Young female mice benefited the most from the prophylaxis with Sulindac alone (p = 0.001) and the DFMO/Sulindac combination (p = 0.018), while aged female mice did not benefit significantly from any intervention. Treatment of SARS-CoV-2-infected animals with DFMO or/and Sulindac did not significantly improve their survival rates. Overall, our studies demonstrated that DFMO and Sulindac administration as the prophylaxis regimen provided strong protection against the lethal outcome of SARS-CoV-2 infection and that male mice benefited more from the polyamine-targeted antiviral treatment than female mice. Our findings underscore the importance of evaluation of the antiviral activity of the drugs in the context of sex and age. Full article

Heparan sulfate proteoglycans serve as initial attachment sites for several viruses and bacteria. Recent studies suggest that SARS-CoV-2 similarly exploits these glycosaminoglycans, facilitating conformational changes in the spike protein that promote the interaction between the receptor-binding domain (S1-RBD) and the cellular angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 receptor (ACE2), thereby triggering the virus internalization process. The molecular details that drive this process, particularly the co-receptor role of heparan sulfate (HS), remain incompletely understood. The interaction between an HS hexasaccharide (hexa) and the N343 glycosylated S1-RBD of the wild-type (WT) and Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 was investigated. The conformational properties of hexa with these S1-RBDs in unbound and bound states are explored using multiple independent MD simulations; the protein binding epitope of hexa, as well as the details of its interaction with S1-RBD of the Omicron variant, are characterized by comparing experimental and theoretical ¹H STD NMR signals. This investigation identifies the role played by the glycosyl moiety at N343 in potentially affecting this interaction in both WT and Omicron S1-RBD, explaining the observed low specificity and multi-modal nature of the interaction between HS oligosaccharides and these S1-RBDs. Full article

Understanding the atomistic basis of multi-layer mechanisms employed by broadly reactive neutralizing antibodies of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein without directly blocking receptor engagement remains an important challenge in coronavirus immunology. Class 4 antibodies represent an intriguing case: they target a deeply conserved, cryptic epitope on the receptor-binding domain yet exhibit variable neutralization potency across subgroups F1 (CR3022, EY6A, COVA1-16), F2 (DH1047), and F3 (S2X259). The molecular basis for this variability is not fully understood. Here, we employed a multi-modal computational approach integrating atomistic and coarse-grained molecular dynamics simulations, binding free energy calculations, mutational scanning, and dynamic network analysis to elucidate how these antibodies engage the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and influence its function. Our results reveal that neutralization efficacy arises from the interplay of direct interfacial interactions and allosteric effects. Group F1 antibodies (CR3022, EY6A, COVA1-16) primarily operate via classic allostery, modulating flexibility in RBD loop regions to indirectly interfere with the ACE2 receptor binding through long-range effects. Group F2 antibody DH1047 represents an intermediate mechanism, combining partial steric hindrance—through engagement of ACE2-critical residues T376, R408, V503, and Y508—with significant allosteric influence, facilitated by localized communication pathways linking the epitope to the receptor interface. Group F3 antibody S2X259 achieves potent neutralization through a synergistic mechanism involving direct competition with ACE2 and localized allosteric stabilization, albeit with potentially increased escape vulnerability. Dynamic network analysis identified a conserved “allosteric ring” within the RBD core that serves as a structural scaffold for long-range signal propagation, with antibody-specific extensions modulating communication to the ACE2 interface. These findings support a model where Class 4 neutralization strategies evolve through the refinement of peripheral allosteric connections rather than epitope redesign. This study establishes a robust computational framework for understanding the atomistic basis of neutralization activity and immune escape for Class 4 antibodies, highlighting how the interplay of binding energetics, conformational dynamics, and allosteric modulation governs their effectiveness against SARS-CoV-2. Full article

SARS-CoV-2, the agent responsible for coronavirus disease in 2019 (COVID-19), has caused extensive global health and socioeconomic impact due to its transmissibility and pathology. As a result, it was classified as a Risk Group 3 human pathogen, and handling samples containing live virus requires enhanced biological containment facilities (i.e., CL3) to reduce the potential of laboratory infection to personnel and the spread of the virus into the community. While the use of an authentic live virus remains the gold standard for biological assays, alternative methods have been developed to effectively evaluate neutralization activity in the absence of a replicating viral agent. Here, we describe a cell-based spike–ACE2 binding assay as a surrogate for neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 spike to identify potential neutralizing antibodies. A main advantage of this approach is the exclusion of infectious viral particles, increasing biosafety for laboratory personnel. The interaction of recombinant SARS-CoV-2 trimeric spike protein with ACE2 is monitored and quantified by flow cytometry. Notably, our previous studies have demonstrated the utility of this assay for other viruses, beyond SARS-CoV-2. The methodology presented here has exhibited a strong correlation to other widely accepted methods, such as pseudotyped lentiviral and live virus neutralization assays, in identifying neutralizing antibodies. Full article

CD9 protein belongs to a family of proteins called tetraspanins, so named for their four-transmembrane-spanning architectures. These proteins are located in domains in the plasmatic membrane, called tetraspanin-enriched microdomains (TEMs). Several proteases and cellular receptors for virus entry cluster into TEMs, suggesting that TEMs are preferred virus entry portals. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike (S) protein mediates virus attachment and entry into cells by binding to human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE-2). In addition, the secretory, type-I membrane-bound SARS-CoV-2 S protein is synthesized as a precursor (proS) that undergoes posttranslational cleavages by host cell proteases, such as furin and TMPRSS2. Moreover, it has been shown that neuropilin-1 (NRP1), which is known to bind furin-cleaved substrates, potentiates SARS-CoV-2 infectivity. Our results indicate that CD9 facilitates SARS-CoV-2 infection. In addition, we show how knocking out CD9 leads to a decrease in the expression of NRP1, a protein that improves SARS-CoV-2 infection. Furthermore, we show that CD9 colocalizes with ACE-2, NRP1, furin, and TMPRSS2 at the plasma membrane; that the absence of CD9 decreases the expression of these proteins on the plasma membrane CD9-enriched microdomains, and that CD9 interacts with ACE2. In conclusion, our data suggest that CD9 facilitates SARS-CoV-2 infection and that CD9 brings together different host proteins involved in SARS-CoV-2 attachment and entry into host cells, such as ACE2, NRP1, furin, and TMPRSS2. Importantly, the fact that a blocking antibody targeting CD9 can effectively reduce SARS-CoV-2 titers highlights not only the mechanistic role of CD9 in viral entry but also offers translational potential, suggesting that tetraspanin-targeting antibodies could be developed as therapeutic agents against SARS-CoV-2 and possibly other coronaviruses, with meaningful implications for clinical intervention. Full article

The COVID-19 pandemic has prompted the scientific community to develop new weapons against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. The study of its mutations is important to understand how it interacts with human receptors and how to prevent a future pandemic. In this study, four mutations of the Omega variant, along with those from the SARS-CoV-1 and MERS variants, were analyzed in complex with the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor. In silico studies were carried out to demonstrate that these mutations affect the interaction with the compounds under investigation. The ligands studied are heterocyclic compounds previously considered as potential inhibitors. Our results show that these compounds interact well with the spike protein and provide insights into how mutations, especially in the RBD region, can lead to perturbations in ligand–protein interactions. Full article

COVID affects around 400 million individuals today with a strong economic impact on the global economy. The list of long COVID symptoms is extremely broad because it is derived from neurological, cardiovascular, respiratory, immune, and renal dysfunctions and damages. We review here these pathophysiological manifestations and the predictors of this multi-organ pathology like the persistence of the virus, altered endothelial function, unrepaired tissue damage, immune dysregulation, and gut dysbiosis. We also discuss the similarities between long COVID and vaccine side effects together with possible common immuno-inflammatory pathways. Since the spike protein is present in SARS-CoV-2 (and its variants) but also produced by the COVID vaccines, its toxicity may also apply to all mRNA or adenoviral DNA vaccines as they are based on the production of a very similar spike protein to the virus. After COVID infection or vaccination, the spike protein can last for months in the body and may interact with ACE2 receptors and mannan-binding lectin (MBL)/mannan-binding lectin serine protease 2 (MASP-2), which are present almost everywhere in the organism. As a result, the spike protein may be able to trigger inflammation in a lot of organs and systems similar to COVID infection. We suggest that three immuno-inflammatory pathways are particularly key and responsible for long COVID and COVID vaccine side effects, as it has been shown for COVID, which may explain in large part their strong similarities: the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS), the kininogen–kinin–kallikrein system (KKS), and the lectin complement pathway. We propose that therapeutic studies should focus on these pathways to propose better cures for both long COVID as well as for COVID vaccine side effects. Full article

The SARS-CoV-2 spike (S1) protein facilitates viral entry through binding to angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), but it also contains an Arg–Gly–Asp (RGD) motif that may enable interactions with RGD-binding integrins on ACE2-negative cells. Here, we provide quantitative evidence for this alternative binding pathway using a live-cell, label-free resonant waveguide grating (RWG) biosensor. RWG technology allowed us to monitor real-time adhesion kinetics of live cells to RGD-displaying substrates, as well as cell adhesion to S1-coated surfaces. To characterize the strength of the integrin–S1 interaction, we determined the dissociation constant using two complementary approaches. First, we performed a live-cell competitive binding assay on RGD-displaying surfaces, where varying concentrations of soluble S1 were added to cell suspensions. Second, we recorded the adhesion kinetics of cells on S1-coated surfaces and fitted the data using a kinetic model based on coupled ordinary differential equations. By comparing the results from both methods, we estimate that approximately 33% of the S1 molecules immobilized on the Nb₂O₅ biosensor surface are capable of initiating integrin-mediated adhesion. These findings support the existence of an alternative integrin-dependent entry route for SARS-CoV-2 and highlight the effectiveness of label-free RWG biosensing for quantitatively probing virus–host interactions under physiologically relevant conditions without the need of the isolation of the interaction partners from the cells. Full article

The rapid evolution of SARS-CoV-2 has underscored the need for a detailed understanding of antibody binding mechanisms to combat immune evasion by emerging variants. In this study, we investigated the interactions between Class I neutralizing antibodies—BD55-1205, BD-604, OMI-42, P5S-1H1, and P5S-2B10—and the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein using multiscale modeling, which combined molecular simulations with the ensemble-based mutational scanning of the binding interfaces and binding free energy computations. A central theme emerging from this work is that the unique binding strength and resilience to immune escape of the BD55-1205 antibody are determined by leveraging a broad epitope footprint and distributed hotspot architecture, additionally supported by backbone-mediated specific interactions, which are less sensitive to amino acid substitutions and together enable exceptional tolerance to mutational escape. In contrast, BD-604 and OMI-42 exhibit localized binding modes with strong dependence on side-chain interactions, rendering them particularly vulnerable to escape mutations at K417N, L455M, F456L and A475V. Similarly, P5S-1H1 and P5S-2B10 display intermediate behavior—effective in some contexts but increasingly susceptible to antigenic drift due to narrower epitope coverage and concentrated hotspots. Our computational predictions show strong agreement with experimental deep mutational scanning data, validating the accuracy of the models and reinforcing the value of binding hotspot mapping in predicting antibody vulnerability. This work highlights that neutralization breadth and durability are not solely dictated by epitope location, but also by how binding energy is distributed across the interface. The results provide atomistic insight into mechanisms driving resilience to immune escape for broadly neutralizing antibodies targeting the ACE2 binding interface—which stems from cumulative effects of structural diversity in binding contacts, redundancy in interaction patterns and reduced vulnerability to mutation-prone positions. Full article

Ferritin nanocages with spherical shells carry proteins or antigens that enable their use as highly efficient nanoreactors and nanocarriers. Mimicking the surface Spike (S) receptor-binding domain (RBD) from SARS-CoV-2, ferritin nanocages induce neutralizing antibody production or block viral entry. Herein, by implementing molecular dynamics simulation, we evaluate the efficiency in the interaction pattern (active or alternative sites) of H-ferritin displaying the 24 S RBDs with host-cell-receptor or monoclonal antibodies (mAbs; B38 or VVH-72). Our constructed nanocage targeted the receptor- or antibody-binding interfaces, suggesting that mAbs demonstrate an enhanced binding affinity with the RBD, with key interactions originating from its variable heavy chain. The S RBD interactions with ACE2 and B38 involved the same binding site but led to divergent dynamic responses. In particular, both B38 chains showed that asymmetric fluctuations had a major effect on their engagement with the Spike RBD. Although the receptor increased the binding affinity of VVH-72 for the RBD, the mAb structural orientation on the nanocage remained identical to its conformation when bound to the host receptor. Overall, our findings characterize the essential pharmacophore formed by Spike RBD residues over nanocage molecules, which mediates high-affinity interactions with either binding partner. Importantly, the ferritin-displayed RBD maintained native receptor and antibody binding profiles, positioning it as a promising scaffold for pre-fusion stabilization and protective RBD vaccine design. Full article

Background: The COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 19) pandemic has underscored the urgent need for effective antiviral agents targeting viral entry mechanisms. This study investigated the inhibitory effects of heparan sulfate (HS) and enoxaparin (EX) on the interaction between the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) spike protein and the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor. Methods: A pseudovirus model was employed to evaluate the efficacy of HS and EX under different treatment strategies: pre-treatment of host cells, pre-treatment of the viral particles, and simultaneous co-treatment. Results: Both compounds significantly inhibited viral entry. EX exhibited a dose-dependent effect under all treatment conditions. In cell pre-treatment, EX achieved the highest levels of inhibition, whereas HS demonstrated consistent inhibitory activity that was largely concentration-independent. Viral pre-treatment revealed that both compounds effectively reduced infectivity by interfering directly with viral particles. In the co-treatment experiments, HS demonstrated superior inhibitory activity at lower concentrations compared to EX. Conclusions: The results suggested that HS and EX inhibit SARS-CoV-2 entry via distinct mechanisms. HS likely acts via competitive inhibition at the host cell surface, while EX may bind directly to the spike protein, thereby preventing engagement with the ACE2 receptor. These findings highlight the therapeutic potential of HS and EX as entry inhibitors targeting the early stages of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Further studies are warranted to evaluate their efficacy against emerging variants and in vivo models. Full article

In this study, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of the interactions between the receptor-binding domain (RBD) of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein and four neutralizing antibodies—S309, S304, CYFN1006, and VIR-7229. Using integrative computational modeling that combined all-atom molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, mutational scanning, and MM-GBSA binding free energy calculations, we elucidated the structural, energetic, and dynamic determinants of antibody binding. Our findings reveal distinct dynamic binding mechanisms and evolutionary adaptation driving the broad neutralization effect of these antibodies. We show that S309 targets conserved residues near the ACE2 interface, leveraging synergistic van der Waals and electrostatic interactions, while S304 focuses on fewer but sensitive residues, making it more susceptible to escape mutations. The analysis of CYFN-1006.1 and CYFN-1006.2 antibody binding highlights broad epitope coverage with critical anchors at T345, K440, and T346, enhancing its efficacy against variants carrying the K356T mutation, which caused escape from S309 binding. Our analysis of broadly potent VIR-7229 antibody binding to XBB.1.5 and EG.5 Omicron variants emphasized a large and structurally complex epitope, demonstrating certain adaptability and compensatory effects to F456L and L455S mutations. Mutational profiling identified key residues crucial for antibody binding, including T345, P337, and R346 for S309 as well as T385 and K386 for S304, underscoring their roles as evolutionary “weak spots” that balance viral fitness and immune evasion. The results of the energetic analysis demonstrate a good agreement between the predicted binding hotspots, reveal distinct energetic mechanisms of binding, and highlight the importance of targeting conserved residues and diverse epitopes to counteract viral resistance. Full article

Since its emergence in late 2019, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has continuously evolved, giving rise to multiple variants that have significantly altered the trajectory of the COVID-19 pandemic. These variants have resulted in multiple waves of the pandemic, exhibiting characteristic mutations in the spike (S) protein that may have affected receptor interaction, tissue tropism, and cell entry mechanisms. While the virus was shown to primarily utilize the angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor and host proteases such as transmembrane serine protease 2 (TMPRSS2) for entry into host cells, alterations in the S protein have resulted in changes to receptor binding affinity and use of alternative receptors, potentially expanding the virus’s ability to infect different cell types or tissues, contributing to shifts in clinical presentation. These changes have been linked to variations in disease severity, the emergence of new clinical manifestations, and altered transmission dynamics. In this paper, we overview the evolving receptor utilization strategies of SARS-CoV-2, focusing on how mutations in the S protein may have influenced viral entry mechanisms and clinical outcomes across the ongoing pandemic waves. Full article