Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (51)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = replisome

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
18 pages, 7164 KiB  
Article
Mechanisms of Viral DNA Replication of Human Papillomavirus: E2 Protein-Dependent Recruitment of E1 DNA Helicase to the Origin of DNA Replication
by Anshul Rana, Gulden Yilmaz, Esther E. Biswas-Fiss and Subhasis Biswas
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(9), 4333; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26094333 - 2 May 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 954
Abstract
Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are small double-stranded DNA viruses that infect epithelial cells and cause cervical, anogenital, and oropharyngeal cancers. HPV genome replication relies on the viral E1 and E2 proteins to initiate DNA replication. The first step is the assembly of the E1-E2 [...] Read more.
Human papillomaviruses (HPVs) are small double-stranded DNA viruses that infect epithelial cells and cause cervical, anogenital, and oropharyngeal cancers. HPV genome replication relies on the viral E1 and E2 proteins to initiate DNA replication. The first step is the assembly of the E1-E2 complex at the origin of replication. We have examined the role of full-length HPV E1 helicase and its interaction with E2 in pre-initiation complex formation. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays (EMSAs) with purified E1 and E2 proteins revealed that the HPV genome does not have a specific E1 binding site, or such a sequence is not required for pre-initiation complex formation. E1 alone did not show any binding to the origin DNA sequences, while E2 facilitated E1 recruitment to the origin, forming the E1-E2-DNA ternary complex. Formation of such a complex required at least two E2 binding sites. These findings led us to propose a novel mechanism in which E2 dimers serve as the primary recruiters of E1 to form the pre-initiation complex. This study provides new insights into the mechanistic role of E2 in the recruitment of E1 at the origin of HPV DNA replication, enhancing our understanding of HPV biology and potentially informing future therapeutic strategies. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

13 pages, 1996 KiB  
Article
Resolving Phenotypic Variability in Mitochondrial Diseases: Preliminary Findings of a Proteomic Approach
by Michela Cicchinelli, Guido Primiano, Serenella Servidei, Michelangelo Ardito, Anna Percio, Andrea Urbani and Federica Iavarone
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(19), 10731; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms251910731 - 5 Oct 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1265
Abstract
The introduction of new sequencing approaches into clinical practice has radically changed the diagnostic approach to mitochondrial diseases, significantly improving the molecular definition rate in this group of neurogenetic disorders. At the same time, there have been no equal successes in the area [...] Read more.
The introduction of new sequencing approaches into clinical practice has radically changed the diagnostic approach to mitochondrial diseases, significantly improving the molecular definition rate in this group of neurogenetic disorders. At the same time, there have been no equal successes in the area of in-depth understanding of disease mechanisms and few innovative therapeutic approaches have been proposed recently. In this regard, the identification of the molecular basis of phenotypic variability in primary mitochondrial disorders represents a key aspect for deciphering disease mechanisms with important therapeutic implications. In this study, we present data from proteomic investigations in two subjects affected by mitochondrial disease characterized by a different clinical severity and associated with the same variant in the TWNK gene, encoding the mitochondrial DNA and RNA helicase with a specific role in the mtDNA replisome. Heterozygous pathogenic variants in this gene are associated with progressive external ophthalmoplegia and ptosis, usually with adult onset. The overall results suggest an imbalance in glucose metabolism and ROS production/regulation, with possible consequences on the phenotypic manifestations of the enrolled subjects. Although the data will need to be validated in a large cohort, proteomic investigations have proven to be a valid approach for a deep understanding of these neurometabolic disorders. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biochemistry)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 2111 KiB  
Review
Assembly, Activation, and Helicase Actions of MCM2-7: Transition from Inactive MCM2-7 Double Hexamers to Active Replication Forks
by Zhiying You and Hisao Masai
Biology 2024, 13(8), 629; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13080629 - 17 Aug 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2991
Abstract
In this review, we summarize the processes of the assembly of multi-protein replisomes at the origins of replication. Replication licensing, the loading of inactive minichromosome maintenance double hexamers (dhMCM2-7) during the G1 phase, is followed by origin firing triggered by two serine–threonine kinases, [...] Read more.
In this review, we summarize the processes of the assembly of multi-protein replisomes at the origins of replication. Replication licensing, the loading of inactive minichromosome maintenance double hexamers (dhMCM2-7) during the G1 phase, is followed by origin firing triggered by two serine–threonine kinases, Cdc7 (DDK) and CDK, leading to the assembly and activation of Cdc45/MCM2-7/GINS (CMG) helicases at the entry into the S phase and the formation of replisomes for bidirectional DNA synthesis. Biochemical and structural analyses of the recruitment of initiation or firing factors to the dhMCM2-7 for the formation of an active helicase and those of origin melting and DNA unwinding support the steric exclusion unwinding model of the CMG helicase. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Replication Licensing System)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1586 KiB  
Review
The Role of the MCM2-7 Helicase Subunit MCM2 in Epigenetic Inheritance
by Jing Jia and Chuanhe Yu
Biology 2024, 13(8), 572; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13080572 - 29 Jul 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2136
Abstract
Recycling histone proteins from parental chromatin, a process known as parental histone transfer, is an important component in chromosome replication and is essential for epigenetic inheritance. We review recent advances in our understanding of the recycling mechanism of parental histone H3-H4 tetramers (parH3:H4tet), [...] Read more.
Recycling histone proteins from parental chromatin, a process known as parental histone transfer, is an important component in chromosome replication and is essential for epigenetic inheritance. We review recent advances in our understanding of the recycling mechanism of parental histone H3-H4 tetramers (parH3:H4tet), emphasizing the pivotal role of the DNA replisome. In particular, we highlight the function of the MCM2-7 helicase subunit Mcm2 as a histone H3-H4 tetramer chaperone. Disruption of this histone chaperone’s functions affects mouse embryonic stem cell differentiation and can lead to embryonic lethality in mice, underscoring the crucial role of the replisome in maintaining epigenomic stability. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Replication Licensing System)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 2158 KiB  
Review
A Decade of Discovery—Eukaryotic Replisome Disassembly at Replication Termination
by Rebecca M. Jones, Alicja Reynolds-Winczura and Agnieszka Gambus
Biology 2024, 13(4), 233; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13040233 - 31 Mar 2024
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3721
Abstract
The eukaryotic replicative helicase (CMG complex) is assembled during DNA replication initiation in a highly regulated manner, which is described in depth by other manuscripts in this Issue. During DNA replication, the replicative helicase moves through the chromatin, unwinding DNA and facilitating nascent [...] Read more.
The eukaryotic replicative helicase (CMG complex) is assembled during DNA replication initiation in a highly regulated manner, which is described in depth by other manuscripts in this Issue. During DNA replication, the replicative helicase moves through the chromatin, unwinding DNA and facilitating nascent DNA synthesis by polymerases. Once the duplication of a replicon is complete, the CMG helicase and the remaining components of the replisome need to be removed from the chromatin. Research carried out over the last ten years has produced a breakthrough in our understanding, revealing that replication termination, and more specifically replisome disassembly, is indeed a highly regulated process. This review brings together our current understanding of these processes and highlights elements of the mechanism that are conserved or have undergone divergence throughout evolution. Finally, we discuss events beyond the classic termination of DNA replication in S-phase and go over the known mechanisms of replicative helicase removal from chromatin in these particular situations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Replication Licensing System)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 9154 KiB  
Article
Developmental Changes in Genome Replication Progression in Pluripotent versus Differentiated Human Cells
by Sunil Kumar Pradhan, Teresa Lozoya, Paulina Prorok, Yue Yuan, Anne Lehmkuhl, Peng Zhang and M. Cristina Cardoso
Genes 2024, 15(3), 305; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15030305 - 27 Feb 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3195
Abstract
DNA replication is a fundamental process ensuring the maintenance of the genome each time cells divide. This is particularly relevant early in development when cells divide profusely, later giving rise to entire organs. Here, we analyze and compare the genome replication progression in [...] Read more.
DNA replication is a fundamental process ensuring the maintenance of the genome each time cells divide. This is particularly relevant early in development when cells divide profusely, later giving rise to entire organs. Here, we analyze and compare the genome replication progression in human embryonic stem cells, induced pluripotent stem cells, and differentiated cells. Using single-cell microscopic approaches, we map the spatio-temporal genome replication as a function of chromatin marks/compaction level. Furthermore, we mapped the replication timing of subchromosomal tandem repeat regions and interspersed repeat sequence elements. Albeit the majority of these genomic repeats did not change their replication timing from pluripotent to differentiated cells, we found developmental changes in the replication timing of rDNA repeats. Comparing single-cell super-resolution microscopic data with data from genome-wide sequencing approaches showed comparable numbers of replicons and large overlap in origins numbers and genomic location among developmental states with a generally higher origin variability in pluripotent cells. Using ratiometric analysis of incorporated nucleotides normalized per replisome in single cells, we uncovered differences in fork speed throughout the S phase in pluripotent cells but not in somatic cells. Altogether, our data define similarities and differences on the replication program and characteristics in human cells at different developmental states. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Mechanisms and Regulation of Human DNA Replication)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2582 KiB  
Review
The Origin Recognition Complex: From Origin Selection to Replication Licensing in Yeast and Humans
by Bik-Kwoon Tye and Yuanliang Zhai
Biology 2024, 13(1), 13; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology13010013 - 25 Dec 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3545
Abstract
Understanding human DNA replication through the study of yeast has been an extremely fruitful journey. The minichromosome maintenance (MCM) 2–7 genes that encode the catalytic core of the eukaryotic replisome were initially identified through forward yeast genetics. The origin recognition complexes (ORC) that [...] Read more.
Understanding human DNA replication through the study of yeast has been an extremely fruitful journey. The minichromosome maintenance (MCM) 2–7 genes that encode the catalytic core of the eukaryotic replisome were initially identified through forward yeast genetics. The origin recognition complexes (ORC) that load the MCM hexamers at replication origins were purified from yeast extracts. We have reached an age where high-resolution cryoEM structures of yeast and human replication complexes can be compared side-by-side. Their similarities and differences are converging as alternative strategies that may deviate in detail but are shared by both species. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Replication Licensing System)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 764 KiB  
Review
The Response of the Replication Apparatus to Leading Template Strand Blocks
by Marina A. Bellani, Althaf Shaik, Ishani Majumdar, Chen Ling and Michael M. Seidman
Cells 2023, 12(22), 2607; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12222607 - 11 Nov 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1903
Abstract
Duplication of the genome requires the replication apparatus to overcome a variety of impediments, including covalent DNA adducts, the most challenging of which is on the leading template strand. Replisomes consist of two functional units, a helicase to unwind DNA and polymerases to [...] Read more.
Duplication of the genome requires the replication apparatus to overcome a variety of impediments, including covalent DNA adducts, the most challenging of which is on the leading template strand. Replisomes consist of two functional units, a helicase to unwind DNA and polymerases to synthesize it. The helicase is a multi-protein complex that encircles the leading template strand and makes the first contact with a leading strand adduct. The size of the channel in the helicase would appear to preclude transit by large adducts such as DNA: protein complexes (DPC). Here we discuss some of the extensively studied pathways that support replication restart after replisome encounters with leading template strand adducts. We also call attention to recent work that highlights the tolerance of the helicase for adducts ostensibly too large to pass through the central channel. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 1830 KiB  
Review
Inhibition of Replication Fork Formation and Progression: Targeting the Replication Initiation and Primosomal Proteins
by Holly M. Radford, Casey J. Toft, Alanna E. Sorenson and Patrick M. Schaeffer
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(10), 8802; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24108802 - 15 May 2023
Viewed by 6347
Abstract
Over 1.2 million deaths are attributed to multi-drug-resistant (MDR) bacteria each year. Persistence of MDR bacteria is primarily due to the molecular mechanisms that permit fast replication and rapid evolution. As many pathogens continue to build resistance genes, current antibiotic treatments are being [...] Read more.
Over 1.2 million deaths are attributed to multi-drug-resistant (MDR) bacteria each year. Persistence of MDR bacteria is primarily due to the molecular mechanisms that permit fast replication and rapid evolution. As many pathogens continue to build resistance genes, current antibiotic treatments are being rendered useless and the pool of reliable treatments for many MDR-associated diseases is thus shrinking at an alarming rate. In the development of novel antibiotics, DNA replication is still a largely underexplored target. This review summarises critical literature and synthesises our current understanding of DNA replication initiation in bacteria with a particular focus on the utility and applicability of essential initiation proteins as emerging drug targets. A critical evaluation of the specific methods available to examine and screen the most promising replication initiation proteins is provided. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 4759 KiB  
Review
Protein–DNA Interactions Regulate Human Papillomavirus DNA Replication, Transcription, and Oncogenesis
by Roxanne Evande, Anshul Rana, Esther E. Biswas-Fiss and Subhasis B. Biswas
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(10), 8493; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24108493 - 9 May 2023
Cited by 26 | Viewed by 7187
Abstract
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a group of alpha papillomaviruses that cause various illnesses, including cancer. There are more than 160 types of HPV, with many being “high-risk” types that have been clinically linked to cervical and other types of cancer. “Low-risk” types of [...] Read more.
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a group of alpha papillomaviruses that cause various illnesses, including cancer. There are more than 160 types of HPV, with many being “high-risk” types that have been clinically linked to cervical and other types of cancer. “Low-risk” types of HPV cause less severe conditions, such as genital warts. Over the past few decades, numerous studies have shed light on how HPV induces carcinogenesis. The HPV genome is a circular double-stranded DNA molecule that is approximately 8 kilobases in size. Replication of this genome is strictly regulated and requires two virus-encoded proteins, E1 and E2. E1 is a DNA helicase that is necessary for replisome assembly and replication of the HPV genome. On the other hand, E2 is responsible for initiating DNA replication and regulating the transcription of HPV-encoded genes, most importantly the E6 and E7 oncogenes. This article explores the genetic characteristics of high-risk HPV types, the roles of HPV-encoded proteins in HPV DNA replication, the regulation of transcription of E6 and E7 oncogenes, and the development of oncogenesis. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 7742 KiB  
Review
Structural and Molecular Basis for Mitochondrial DNA Replication and Transcription in Health and Antiviral Drug Toxicity
by Joon Park, Noe Baruch-Torres and Y. Whitney Yin
Molecules 2023, 28(4), 1796; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28041796 - 14 Feb 2023
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 5493
Abstract
Human mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is a 16.9 kbp double-stranded, circular DNA, encoding subunits of the oxidative phosphorylation electron transfer chain and essential RNAs for mitochondrial protein translation. The minimal human mtDNA replisome is composed of the DNA helicase Twinkle, DNA polymerase γ, and [...] Read more.
Human mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) is a 16.9 kbp double-stranded, circular DNA, encoding subunits of the oxidative phosphorylation electron transfer chain and essential RNAs for mitochondrial protein translation. The minimal human mtDNA replisome is composed of the DNA helicase Twinkle, DNA polymerase γ, and mitochondrial single-stranded DNA-binding protein. While the mitochondrial RNA transcription is carried out by mitochondrial RNA polymerase, mitochondrial transcription factors TFAM and TFB2M, and a transcription elongation factor, TEFM, both RNA transcriptions, and DNA replication machineries are intertwined and control mtDNA copy numbers, cellular energy supplies, and cellular metabolism. In this review, we discuss the mechanisms governing these main pathways and the mtDNA diseases that arise from mutations in transcription and replication machineries from a structural point of view. We also address the adverse effect of antiviral drugs mediated by mitochondrial DNA and RNA polymerases as well as possible structural approaches to develop nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor and ribonucleosides analogs with reduced toxicity. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Small Molecule Inhibitors of Polymerases Involved in Human Diseases)
Show Figures

Figure 1

33 pages, 4072 KiB  
Review
Impact of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on the Field of Single-Molecule Biophysics
by David A. Ball, Binta Jalloh and Tatiana S. Karpova
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2022, 23(24), 15895; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms232415895 - 14 Dec 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2577
Abstract
Cellular functions depend on the dynamic assembly of protein regulator complexes at specific cellular locations. Single Molecule Tracking (SMT) is a method of choice for the biochemical characterization of protein dynamics in vitro and in vivo. SMT follows individual molecules in live cells [...] Read more.
Cellular functions depend on the dynamic assembly of protein regulator complexes at specific cellular locations. Single Molecule Tracking (SMT) is a method of choice for the biochemical characterization of protein dynamics in vitro and in vivo. SMT follows individual molecules in live cells and provides direct information about their behavior. SMT was successfully applied to mammalian models. However, mammalian cells provide a complex environment where protein mobility depends on numerous factors that are difficult to control experimentally. Therefore, yeast cells, which are unicellular and well-studied with a small and completely sequenced genome, provide an attractive alternative for SMT. The simplicity of organization, ease of genetic manipulation, and tolerance to gene fusions all make yeast a great model for quantifying the kinetics of major enzymes, membrane proteins, and nuclear and cellular bodies. However, very few researchers apply SMT techniques to yeast. Our goal is to promote SMT in yeast to a wider research community. Our review serves a dual purpose. We explain how SMT is conducted in yeast cells, and we discuss the latest insights from yeast SMT while putting them in perspective with SMT of higher eukaryotes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Yeast: Molecular and Cell Biology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 4450 KiB  
Article
Dbf4-Cdc7 (DDK) Inhibitor PHA-767491 Displays Potent Anti-Proliferative Effects via Crosstalk with the CDK2-RB-E2F Pathway
by Tekle Pauzaite, James Tollitt, Betul Sopaci, Louise Caprani, Olivia Iwanowytsch, Urvi Thacker, John G. Hardy, Sarah L. Allinson and Nikki A. Copeland
Biomedicines 2022, 10(8), 2012; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines10082012 - 19 Aug 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3289
Abstract
Precise regulation of DNA replication complex assembly requires cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) and Dbf4-dependent kinase (DDK) activities to activate the replicative helicase complex and initiate DNA replication. Chemical probes have been essential in the molecular analysis of DDK-mediated regulation of MCM2-7 activation and the [...] Read more.
Precise regulation of DNA replication complex assembly requires cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) and Dbf4-dependent kinase (DDK) activities to activate the replicative helicase complex and initiate DNA replication. Chemical probes have been essential in the molecular analysis of DDK-mediated regulation of MCM2-7 activation and the initiation phase of DNA replication. Here, the inhibitory activity of two distinct DDK inhibitor chemotypes, PHA-767491 and XL-413, were assessed in cell-free and cell-based proliferation assays. PHA-767491 and XL-413 show distinct effects at the level of cellular proliferation, initiation of DNA replication and replisome activity. XL-413 and PHA-767491 both reduce DDK-specific phosphorylation of MCM2 but show differential potency in prevention of S-phase entry. DNA combing and DNA replication assays show that PHA-767491 is a potent inhibitor of the initiation phase of DNA replication but XL413 has weak activity. Importantly, PHA-767491 decreased E2F-mediated transcription of the G1/S regulators cyclin A2, cyclin E1 and cyclin E2, and this effect was independent of CDK9 inhibition. Significantly, the enhanced inhibitory profile of PHA-767491 is mediated by potent inhibition of both DDK and the CDK2-Rb-E2F transcriptional network, that provides the molecular basis for its increased anti-proliferative effects in RB+ cancer cell lines. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Research of Targeting CDKs in Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 1672 KiB  
Review
DDK: The Outsourced Kinase of Chromosome Maintenance
by Peter J. Gillespie and J. Julian Blow
Biology 2022, 11(6), 877; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11060877 - 7 Jun 2022
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 4443
Abstract
The maintenance of genomic stability during the mitotic cell-cycle not only demands that the DNA is duplicated and repaired with high fidelity, but that following DNA replication the chromatin composition is perpetuated and that the duplicated chromatids remain tethered until their anaphase segregation. [...] Read more.
The maintenance of genomic stability during the mitotic cell-cycle not only demands that the DNA is duplicated and repaired with high fidelity, but that following DNA replication the chromatin composition is perpetuated and that the duplicated chromatids remain tethered until their anaphase segregation. The coordination of these processes during S phase is achieved by both cyclin-dependent kinase, CDK, and Dbf4-dependent kinase, DDK. CDK orchestrates the activation of DDK at the G1-to-S transition, acting as the ‘global’ regulator of S phase and cell-cycle progression, whilst ‘local’ control of the initiation of DNA replication and repair and their coordination with the re-formation of local chromatin environments and the establishment of chromatid cohesion are delegated to DDK. Here, we discuss the regulation and the multiple roles of DDK in ensuring chromosome maintenance. Regulation of replication initiation by DDK has long been known to involve phosphorylation of MCM2-7 subunits, but more recent results have indicated that Treslin:MTBP might also be important substrates. Molecular mechanisms by which DDK regulates replisome stability and replicated chromatid cohesion are less well understood, though important new insights have been reported recently. We discuss how the ‘outsourcing’ of activities required for chromosome maintenance to DDK allows CDK to maintain outright control of S phase progression and the cell-cycle phase transitions whilst permitting ongoing chromatin replication and cohesion establishment to be completed and achieved faithfully. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue MTBP-Cellular Roles Underlying Cancer Formation and Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 942 KiB  
Review
The Role of MTBP as a Replication Origin Firing Factor
by Eman Zaffar, Pedro Ferreira, Luis Sanchez-Pulido and Dominik Boos
Biology 2022, 11(6), 827; https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11060827 - 27 May 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3428
Abstract
The initiation step of replication at replication origins determines when and where in the genome replication machines, replisomes, are generated. Tight control of replication initiation helps facilitate the two main tasks of genome replication, to duplicate the genome accurately and exactly once each [...] Read more.
The initiation step of replication at replication origins determines when and where in the genome replication machines, replisomes, are generated. Tight control of replication initiation helps facilitate the two main tasks of genome replication, to duplicate the genome accurately and exactly once each cell division cycle. The regulation of replication initiation must ensure that initiation occurs during the S phase specifically, that no origin fires more than once per cell cycle, that enough origins fire to avoid non-replicated gaps, and that the right origins fire at the right time but only in favorable circumstances. Despite its importance for genetic homeostasis only the main molecular processes of eukaryotic replication initiation and its cellular regulation are understood. The MTBP protein (Mdm2-binding protein) is so far the last core replication initiation factor identified in metazoan cells. MTBP is the orthologue of yeast Sld7. It is essential for origin firing, the maturation of pre-replicative complexes (pre-RCs) into replisomes, and is emerging as a regulation focus targeted by kinases and by regulated degradation. We present recent insight into the structure and cellular function of the MTBP protein in light of recent structural and biochemical studies revealing critical molecular details of the eukaryotic origin firing reaction. How the roles of MTBP in replication and other cellular processes are mutually connected and are related to MTBP’s contribution to tumorigenesis remains largely unclear. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue MTBP-Cellular Roles Underlying Cancer Formation and Disease)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop