Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (30)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = proton therapy dosimetry

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
17 pages, 2212 KiB  
Article
Advanced External Beam Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Skull Base Reirradiation
by He Wang, Fahed M. Alsanea, Dong Joo Rhee, Xiaodong Zhang, Wei Liu, Jinzhong Yang, Zhifei Wen, Yao Zhao, Tyler D. Williamson, Rachel A. Hunter, Peter A. Balter, Tina M. Briere, Ronald X. Zhu, Anna Lee, Amy C. Moreno, Jay P. Reddy, Adam S. Garden, David I. Rosenthal, Gary B. Gunn and Jack Phan
Cancers 2025, 17(3), 540; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17030540 - 5 Feb 2025
Viewed by 1551
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for skull base reirradiation is particularly challenging, as patients have already received substantial radiation doses to the region, and nearby normal organs may have approached their tolerance limit from prior treatments. In this study, we reviewed the [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for skull base reirradiation is particularly challenging, as patients have already received substantial radiation doses to the region, and nearby normal organs may have approached their tolerance limit from prior treatments. In this study, we reviewed the characteristics and capabilities of four advanced external beam radiation delivery systems and four modern treatment planning systems and evaluated the treatment plan quality of each technique using skull base reirradiation patient cases. Methods: SBRT plans were generated for sixteen skull base reirradiation patients using four modalities: the GK plan for the Elekta Leksell Gamma Knife Perfexion/ICON, the CyberKnife (CK) plan for the Accuray CyberKnife, the intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plan for the Hitachi ProBeat-FR proton therapy machine, and the volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan for the Varian TrueBeam STx. These plans were evaluated and compared using two novel gradient indices in addition to traditional dosimetry metrics for targets and organs at risk (OARs). The steepest border gradient quantified the percent prescription dose fall-off per millimeter at the boundary between the target and adjacent critical structures. This gradient index highlighted the system’s ability to spare nearby critical OARs. The volume gradient assessed the extent of dose spread outside the target toward the patient’s body. Results: All plans achieved comparable target coverage and conformity, while IMPT and VMAT demonstrated significantly better uniformity. The GK plans exhibited the highest border gradient, up to 20.9%/mm, followed by small-spot-size IMPT plans and CK plans. Additionally, IMPT plans showed the benefit of reduced dose spread in low-dose regions and the lowest maximum and mean doses to the brainstem and carotid artery. Conclusions: The advanced external beam radiotherapy modalities evaluated in this study are well-suited for SBRT in skull base reirradiation, which demands precise targeting of tumors with highly conformal doses and steep dose gradients to protect nearby normal structures. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 309 KiB  
Review
Advancements in Locoregional Therapies for Unresectable Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma
by Conor D. J. O’Donnell, Umair Majeed, Michael S. Rutenberg, Kristopher P. Croome, Katherine E. Poruk, Beau Toskich and Zhaohui Jin
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(2), 82; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32020082 - 31 Jan 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2417
Abstract
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is an aggressive malignancy with rising incidence and poor outcomes. This review examines recent advancements in locoregional therapies for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, focusing on external beam radiotherapy, transarterial radioembolization (TARE), hepatic artery infusion pump (HAIP) chemotherapy, and liver transplantation. Stereotactic body [...] Read more.
Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma is an aggressive malignancy with rising incidence and poor outcomes. This review examines recent advancements in locoregional therapies for unresectable intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, focusing on external beam radiotherapy, transarterial radioembolization (TARE), hepatic artery infusion pump (HAIP) chemotherapy, and liver transplantation. Stereotactic body radiation therapy and proton beam therapy have shown promise in achieving local control and improving survival. TARE, with personalized dosimetry, has demonstrated encouraging results in select patient populations. HAIP chemotherapy, primarily studied using floxuridine, has yielded impressive survival outcomes in phase II trials. Liver transplantation, once contraindicated, is now being reconsidered for carefully selected patients with localized disease. While these locoregional approaches show potential, randomized controlled trials comparing them to standard systemic therapy are lacking. Patient selection remains crucial, with factors such as liver function, tumor burden, and molecular profile influencing treatment decisions. Ongoing research aims to optimize treatment sequencing, explore combination strategies with systemic therapies, and refine phenotype identification and patient selection criteria. As the landscape of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma management evolves, a multidisciplinary approach is essential to tailor treatment strategies and improve outcomes for patients with this challenging disease. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biliary Tract Cancer Updates: Advancements and Insights)
20 pages, 5418 KiB  
Article
Challenges for the Implementation of Primary Standard Dosimetry in Proton Minibeam Radiation Therapy
by John Cotterill, Samuel Flynn, Russell Thomas, Anna Subiel, Nigel Lee, Michael Homer, Hugo Palmans, Ludovic De Marzi, Yolanda Prezado, David Shipley and Ana Lourenço
Cancers 2024, 16(23), 4013; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16234013 - 29 Nov 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1108
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Spatial fractionation of proton fields as sub-millimeter beamlets to treat cancer has shown better sparing of healthy tissue whilst maintaining the same tumor control. It is critical to ensure primary standard dosimetry is accurate and ready to support the modality’s clinical [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Spatial fractionation of proton fields as sub-millimeter beamlets to treat cancer has shown better sparing of healthy tissue whilst maintaining the same tumor control. It is critical to ensure primary standard dosimetry is accurate and ready to support the modality’s clinical implementation. Methods: This work provided a proof-of-concept, using the National Physical Laboratory’s Primary Standard Proton Calorimeter (PSPC) to measure average absorbed dose-to-water in a pMBRT field. A 100 MeV mono-energetic field and a 2 cm wide SOBP were produced with a spot-scanned proton beam incident on a collimator comprising 15 slits of 400 µm width, each 5 cm long and separated by a center-to-center distance of 4 mm. Results: The results showed the uncertainty on the absorbed dose-to-water in the mono-energetic beam was dominated by contributions of 1.4% and 1.1% (k = 1) for the NPL PSPC and PTW Roos chambers, respectively, originating from the achievable positioning accuracy of the devices. In comparison, the uncertainty due to positioning in the SOBP for both the NPL PSPC and PTW Roos chambers were 0.4%. Conclusions: These results highlight that it may be more accurate and reliable to perform reference dosimetry measuring the Dose-Area Product or in an SOBP for spatially fractionated fields. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Steps towards the Clinics in Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

45 pages, 1174 KiB  
Review
Proton Radiation Therapy: A Systematic Review of Treatment-Related Side Effects and Toxicities
by Peter P. Salem, Perla Chami, Remy Daou, Joseph Hajj, Haibo Lin, Arpit M. Chhabra, Charles B. Simone, Nancy Y. Lee and Carla Hajj
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(20), 10969; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252010969 - 11 Oct 2024
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 5116
Abstract
Cancer is the second leading cause of death worldwide. Around half of all cancer patients undergo some type of radiation therapy throughout the course of their treatment. Photon radiation remains (RT) the most widely utilized modality of radiotherapy despite recent advancements in proton [...] Read more.
Cancer is the second leading cause of death worldwide. Around half of all cancer patients undergo some type of radiation therapy throughout the course of their treatment. Photon radiation remains (RT) the most widely utilized modality of radiotherapy despite recent advancements in proton radiation therapy (PBT). PBT makes use of the particle’s biological property known as the Bragg peak to better spare healthy tissue from radiation damage, with data to support that this treatment modality is less toxic than photon RT. Hence, proton radiation dosimetry looks better compared to photon dosimetry; however, due to proton-specific uncertainties, unexpected acute, subacute, and long-term toxicities can be encountered. Reported neurotoxicity resulting from proton radiation treatments include radiation necrosis, moyamoya syndrome, neurosensory toxicities, brain edema, neuromuscular toxicities, and neurocognitive toxicities. Pulmonary toxicities include pneumonitis and fibrosis, pleural effusions, and bronchial toxicities. Pericarditis, pericardial effusions, and atrial fibrillations are among the cardiac toxicities related to proton therapy. Gastrointestinal and hematological toxicities are also found in the literature. Genitourinary toxicities include urinary and reproductive-related toxicities. Osteological, oral, endocrine, and skin toxicities have also been reported. The side effects will be comparable to the ones following photon RT, nonetheless at an expected lower incidence. The toxicities collected mainly from case reports and clinical trials are described based on the organs affected and functions altered. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights into Radiation Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 15129 KiB  
Case Report
Rectal Spacer Placement for Anorectal Reirradiation of De Novo Rectal or Anal Cancer Following Prostate Radiation Therapy
by Alexandra D. Dreyfuss, John P. Navilio, Neal Kim, Andy Shim, Paul B. Romesser, Marsha Reyngold, Michael J. Zelefsky, Christopher H. Crane and Carla Hajj
Radiation 2024, 4(3), 242-252; https://doi.org/10.3390/radiation4030019 - 6 Sep 2024
Viewed by 1690
Abstract
Background: Pelvic reirradiation of de novo rectal or anal cancer after prior prostate cancer RT poses a significant risk of urinary and rectal fistula. In this report we describe the use of a rectal spacer to improve dosimetry and reduce this risk. Methods: [...] Read more.
Background: Pelvic reirradiation of de novo rectal or anal cancer after prior prostate cancer RT poses a significant risk of urinary and rectal fistula. In this report we describe the use of a rectal spacer to improve dosimetry and reduce this risk. Methods: Patients undergoing anorectal radiotherapy (RT) after prior prostate RT who had a rectal spacer placed prior to RT were identified in a prospective database. Patient, disease, and treatment characteristics were collected for these patients. Survival data were calculated from the end of RT. Radiation was delivered with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or proton beam therapy (PBT) following rectal spacer placement. Results: Rectal spacer placement with hydrogel injected transperineally under transrectal ultrasound guidance was successful in all five patients. MR/CT simulation 1–2 weeks post-spacer placement and IMRT or PBT delivered to a dose of 36–50 Gy in 24–30 fractions once or twice daily were tolerated well by all patients. The V100% of the PTV ranged from 62–100% and mean rectal and bladder dose ranged from 39–46 Gy and 16–40 Gy, respectively. At the last follow-up, three patients were alive and without evidence of disease up to 48 months out from treatment. There were no acute or late grade 3 or higher toxicities observed, but acute grade 2 proctitis was observed in all patients. Conclusions: The use of a rectal spacer placement to improve dosimetry of IMRT and PBT after prior prostate RT is safe and feasible in appropriately selected anorectal cancer patients. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 6840 KiB  
Article
Does the Maximum Initial Beam Energy for Proton Therapy Have to Be 230 MeV?
by Chris J. Beltran, Alvaro Perales and Keith M. Furutani
Quantum Beam Sci. 2024, 8(3), 23; https://doi.org/10.3390/qubs8030023 - 3 Sep 2024
Viewed by 2334
Abstract
Proton therapy is increasingly widespread and requires an accelerator to provide the high energy protons. Most often, the accelerators used for proton therapy are cyclotrons and the maximum initial beam energy (MIBE) is about 230 MeV or more to be able to achieve [...] Read more.
Proton therapy is increasingly widespread and requires an accelerator to provide the high energy protons. Most often, the accelerators used for proton therapy are cyclotrons and the maximum initial beam energy (MIBE) is about 230 MeV or more to be able to achieve a range of approximately 30 cm in water. We ask whether such a high energy is necessary for adequate dosimetry for pathologies to be treated with proton beams. Eight patients of different clinical sites (brain, prostate, and head and neck cancers) were selected to conduct this study. We analyzed the tumor dose coverage and homogeneity, as well as healthy tissue protection for MIBE values of 120, 160, 180, 200 and 230 MeV. For each patient, a proton plan was developed using the particular MIBE and then using multifield optimization (MFO). In this way, 34 plans in total were generated to fulfill the unique clinical goals. This study found that MIBE of 120 MeV for brain tumors; 160 MeV for head and neck cancer; and remarkably, for prostate cancer, only 160 MeV for one patient case and 180 MeV for the remainder satisfied the clinical goals (words: 187 < approx. 200 words or less) Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Quantum Beam Science: Feature Papers 2024)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1746 KiB  
Article
In Silico Comparison of Three Different Beam Arrangements for Intensity-Modulated Proton Therapy for Postoperative Whole Pelvic Irradiation of Prostate Cancer
by Emile Gogineni, Hao Chen, Ian K. Cruickshank, Andrew Koempel, Aarush Gogineni, Heng Li and Curtiland Deville
Cancers 2024, 16(15), 2702; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16152702 - 30 Jul 2024
Viewed by 1637
Abstract
Background and purpose: Proton therapy has been shown to provide dosimetric benefits in comparison with IMRT when treating prostate cancer with whole pelvis radiation; however, the optimal proton beam arrangement has yet to be established. The aim of this study was to evaluate [...] Read more.
Background and purpose: Proton therapy has been shown to provide dosimetric benefits in comparison with IMRT when treating prostate cancer with whole pelvis radiation; however, the optimal proton beam arrangement has yet to be established. The aim of this study was to evaluate three different intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) beam arrangements when treating the prostate bed and pelvis in the postoperative setting. Materials and Methods: Twenty-three post-prostatectomy patients were planned using three different beam arrangements: two-field (IMPT2B) (opposed laterals), three-field (IMPT3B) (opposed laterals inferiorly matched to a posterior–anterior beam superiorly), and four-field (IMPT4B) (opposed laterals inferiorly matched to two posterior oblique beams superiorly) arrangements. The prescription was 50 Gy radiobiological equivalent (GyE) to the pelvis and 70 GyE to the prostate bed. Comparisons were made using paired two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Results: CTV coverages were met for all IMPT plans, with 99% of CTVs receiving ≥ 100% of prescription doses. All organ at risk (OAR) objectives were met with IMPT3B and IMPT4B plans, while several rectum objectives were exceeded by IMPT2B plans. IMPT4B provided the lowest doses to OARs for the majority of analyzed outcomes, with significantly lower doses than IMPT2B +/− IMPT3B for bladder V30–V50 and mean dose; bowel V15–V45 and mean dose; sigmoid maximum dose; rectum V40–V72.1, maximum dose, and mean dose; femoral head V37–40 and maximum dose; bone V40 and mean dose; penile bulb mean dose; and skin maximum dose. Conclusion: This study is the first to compare proton beam arrangements when treating the prostate bed and pelvis. four-field plans provided better sparing of the bladder, bowel, and rectum than 2- and three-field plans. The data presented herein may help inform the future delivery of whole pelvis IMPT for prostate cancer. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Particle Therapy: State-of-the-Art and Future Prospects)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 2655 KiB  
Article
Multi-Point Sensing via Organic Optical Fibres for FLASH Proton Therapy
by Crystal Penner, Samuel Usherovich, Sophia Andru, Camille Bélanger-Champagne, Janina Hohnholz, Boris Stoeber, Cheryl Duzenli and Cornelia Hoehr
Electronics 2024, 13(11), 2211; https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13112211 - 6 Jun 2024
Viewed by 1407
Abstract
Optical fibres are gaining popularity for relative dosimetry in proton therapy due to their spatial resolution and ability for near real-time acquisition. For FLASH proton therapy, these fibres need to handle higher dose rates and larger doses than for conventional proton dose rates. [...] Read more.
Optical fibres are gaining popularity for relative dosimetry in proton therapy due to their spatial resolution and ability for near real-time acquisition. For FLASH proton therapy, these fibres need to handle higher dose rates and larger doses than for conventional proton dose rates. We developed a multi-point fibre sensor embedded in a 3D-printed phantom which can measure the profile of a FLASH proton beam. Seven PMMA fibres of 1 mm diameter were embedded in a custom 3D-printed plastic phantom of the same density as the fibres. The phantom was placed in a proton beam with FLASH dose rates at the TRIUMF Proton Therapy Research Centre (PTRC). The sensor was exposed to different proton energies, 13.5 MeV, 19 MeV and 40.4 MeV, achieved by adding PMMA bolus in front of the phantom and three different beam currents, varying the dose rates from 7.5 to 101 Gy/s. The array was able to record beam profiles in both transverse and axial directions in relative agreement with measurements from EBT-XD radiochromic films (transverse) and Monte Carlo simulations (axial). A decrease in light output over time was observed, which might be caused by radiation damage in the matrix of the fibre and characterised by an exponential decay function. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Applications of Optical Fiber Sensors)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1791 KiB  
Article
Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Bragg Peak Conformal FLASH in Prostate Cancer Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy
by Tyler Kaulfers, Grant Lattery, Chingyun Cheng, Xingyi Zhao, Balaji Selvaraj, Hui Wu, Arpit M. Chhabra, Jehee Isabelle Choi, Haibo Lin, Charles B. Simone, Shaakir Hasan, Minglei Kang and Jenghwa Chang
Cancers 2024, 16(4), 798; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16040798 - 15 Feb 2024
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2605
Abstract
Bragg peak FLASH radiotherapy (RT) uses a distal tracking method to eliminate exit doses and can achieve superior OAR sparing. This study explores the application of this novel method in stereotactic body radiotherapy prostate FLASH-RT. An in-house platform was developed to enable intensity-modulated [...] Read more.
Bragg peak FLASH radiotherapy (RT) uses a distal tracking method to eliminate exit doses and can achieve superior OAR sparing. This study explores the application of this novel method in stereotactic body radiotherapy prostate FLASH-RT. An in-house platform was developed to enable intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) planning using a single-energy Bragg peak distal tracking method. The patients involved in the study were previously treated with proton stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) using the pencil beam scanning (PBS) technique to 40 Gy in five fractions. FLASH plans were optimized using a four-beam arrangement to generate a dose distribution similar to the conventional opposing beams. All of the beams had a small angle of two degrees from the lateral direction to increase the dosimetry quality. Dose metrics were compared between the conventional PBS and the Bragg peak FLASH plans. The dose rate histogram (DRVH) and FLASH metrics of 40 Gy/s coverage (V40Gy/s) were investigated for the Bragg peak plans. There was no significant difference between the clinical and Bragg peak plans in rectum, bladder, femur heads, large bowel, and penile bulb dose metrics, except for Dmax. For the CTV, the FLASH plans resulted in a higher Dmax than the clinical plans (116.9% vs. 103.3%). For the rectum, the V40Gy/s reached 94% and 93% for 1 Gy dose thresholds in composite and single-field evaluations, respectively. Additionally, the FLASH ratio reached close to 100% after the application of the 5 Gy threshold in composite dose rate assessment. In conclusion, the Bragg peak distal tracking method can yield comparable plan quality in most OARs while preserving sufficient FLASH dose rate coverage, demonstrating that the ultra-high dose technique can be applied in prostate FLASH SBRT. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Particle Therapy for Cancer Treatment and Research)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 2675 KiB  
Article
The Role of Proton Therapy for Prostate Cancer in the Setting of Hip Prosthesis
by Maryam Moteabbed, Mislav Bobić, Harald Paganetti and Jason A. Efstathiou
Cancers 2024, 16(2), 330; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16020330 - 11 Jan 2024
Viewed by 2481
Abstract
Purpose: Given that the current standard of proton therapy (PT) for prostate cancer is through bilateral beams, this modality is typically avoided when it comes to treatment of patients with hip prosthesis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether novel PT [...] Read more.
Purpose: Given that the current standard of proton therapy (PT) for prostate cancer is through bilateral beams, this modality is typically avoided when it comes to treatment of patients with hip prosthesis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether novel PT methods, i.e., anterior proton beams and proton arc therapy (PArc), could be feasible options to treat this patient subpopulation. We evaluate PT methods in the context of dosimetry and robustness and compare with standard of practice volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to explore any potential benefits. Methods: Two PT and one VMAT treatment plans were retrospectively created for 10 patients who participated in a clinical trial with a weekly repeat CT (rCT) imaging component. All plans were robustly optimized and featured: (1) combination anterior oblique and lateral proton beams (AoL), (2) PArc, and (3) VMAT. All patients had hydrogel spacers in place, which enabled safe application of anterior proton beams. The planned dose was 70 Gy (RBE) to the entire prostate gland and 50 Gy (RBE) to the proximal seminal vesicles in 28 fractions. Along with plan dose–volume metrics, robustness to setup and interfractional variations were evaluated using the weekly rCT images. The linear energy transfer (LET)-weighted dose was evaluated for PArc plans to ensure urethra sparing given the typical high-LET region at the end of range. Results: Both PT methods were dosimetrically feasible and provided reduction of some key OAR metrics compared to VMAT except for penile bulb, while providing equally good target coverage. Significant differences in median rectum V35 (22–25%), penile bulb Dmean (5 Gy), rectum V61 (2%), right femoral head Dmean (5 Gy), and bladder V39 (4%) were found between PT and VMAT. All plans were equally robust to variations. LET-weighted dose in urethra was equivalent to the physical dose for PArc plans and hence no added urethral toxicity was expected. Conclusions: PT for treatment of prostate cancer patients with hip prosthesis is feasible and equivalent or potentially superior to VMAT in quality in some cases. The choice of radiotherapy regimen can be personalized based on patient characteristics to achieve the best treatment outcome. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Proton Therapy for Cancer in the Era of Precision Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2349 KiB  
Article
Successful Implementation of Image-Guided Pencil-Beam Scanning Proton Therapy in Medulloblastomas
by Anindita Das, Utpal Gaikwad, Ganapathy Krishnan, Adhithyan Rajendran, Sushama Patil, Preethi Subramaniam, Uday Krishna, Manoj G. Wakde, Srinivas Chilukuri and Rakesh Jalali
Diagnostics 2023, 13(21), 3378; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13213378 - 3 Nov 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1930
Abstract
Medulloblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumour in children, while much rarer in adults. Although the prognosis and outcomes have greatly improved in the era of modern multidisciplinary management, long-term treatment-induced toxicities are common. Craniospinal irradiation followed by a boost to the [...] Read more.
Medulloblastoma is the most common malignant brain tumour in children, while much rarer in adults. Although the prognosis and outcomes have greatly improved in the era of modern multidisciplinary management, long-term treatment-induced toxicities are common. Craniospinal irradiation followed by a boost to the primary and metastatic tumour sites forms the backbone of treatment. Proton therapy has been endorsed over conventional photon-based radiotherapy due to its superior dosimetric advantages and subsequently lower incidence and severity of toxicities. We report here our experience from South-East Asia’s first proton therapy centre of treating 40 patients with medulloblastoma (38 children and adolescents, 2 adults) who received image-guided, intensity-modulated proton therapy with pencil-beam scanning between 2019 and 2023, with a focus on dosimetry, acute toxicities, and early survival outcomes. All patients could complete the planned course of proton therapy, with mostly mild acute toxicities that were manageable on an outpatient basis. Haematological toxicity was not dose-limiting and did not prolong the overall treatment time. Preliminary data on early outcomes including overall survival and disease-free survival are encouraging, although a longer follow-up and data on long-term toxicities are needed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Medulloblastoma—Existing and Evolving Landscape)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1749 KiB  
Article
Proton Bragg Peak FLASH Enables Organ Sparing and Ultra-High Dose-Rate Delivery: Proof of Principle in Recurrent Head and Neck Cancer
by Michael Pennock, Shouyi Wei, Chingyun Cheng, Haibo Lin, Shaakir Hasan, Arpit M. Chhabra, J. Isabelle Choi, Richard L. Bakst, Rafi Kabarriti, Charles B. Simone II, Nancy Y. Lee, Minglei Kang and Robert H. Press
Cancers 2023, 15(15), 3828; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15153828 - 28 Jul 2023
Cited by 21 | Viewed by 3359
Abstract
Proton pencil-beam scanning (PBS) Bragg peak FLASH combines ultra-high dose rate delivery and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing. This proof-of-principle study compared dosimetry and dose rate coverage between PBS Bragg peak FLASH and PBS transmission FLASH in head and neck reirradiation. PBS Bragg peak FLASH [...] Read more.
Proton pencil-beam scanning (PBS) Bragg peak FLASH combines ultra-high dose rate delivery and organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing. This proof-of-principle study compared dosimetry and dose rate coverage between PBS Bragg peak FLASH and PBS transmission FLASH in head and neck reirradiation. PBS Bragg peak FLASH plans were created via the highest beam single energy, range shifter, and range compensator, and were compared to PBS transmission FLASH plans for 6 GyE/fraction and 10 GyE/fraction in eight recurrent head and neck patients originally treated with quad shot reirradiation (14.8/3.7 CGE). The 6 GyE/fraction and 10 GyE/fraction plans were also created using conventional-rate intensity-modulated proton therapy techniques. PBS Bragg peak FLASH, PBS transmission FLASH, and conventional plans were compared for OAR sparing, FLASH dose rate coverage, and target coverage. All FLASH OAR V40 Gy/s dose rate coverage was 90–100% at 6 GyE and 10 GyE for both FLASH modalities. PBS Bragg peak FLASH generated dose volume histograms (DVHs) like those of conventional therapy and demonstrated improved OAR dose sparing over PBS transmission FLASH. All the modalities had similar CTV coverage. PBS Bragg peak FLASH can deliver conformal, ultra-high dose rate FLASH with a two-millisecond delivery of the minimum MU per spot. PBS Bragg peak FLASH demonstrated similar dose rate coverage to PBS transmission FLASH with improved OAR dose-sparing, which was more pronounced in the 10 GyE/fraction than in the 6 GyE/fraction. This feasibility study generates hypotheses for the benefits of FLASH in head and neck reirradiation and developing biological models. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Progress in Proton Radiotherapy of Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 3048 KiB  
Article
Epitaxial SiC Dosimeters and Flux Monitoring Detectors for Proton Therapy Beams
by Mara Bruzzi and Enrico Verroi
Materials 2023, 16(10), 3643; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16103643 - 10 May 2023
Viewed by 1827
Abstract
The exceptional optoelectronic properties and high radiation resistance of epitaxial silicon carbide make this material attractive for high-energy beam dosimetry and radiation monitoring, especially when strict requirements such as high signal-to-noise ratios, high time and spatial resolutions and low detectivity levels are required. [...] Read more.
The exceptional optoelectronic properties and high radiation resistance of epitaxial silicon carbide make this material attractive for high-energy beam dosimetry and radiation monitoring, especially when strict requirements such as high signal-to-noise ratios, high time and spatial resolutions and low detectivity levels are required. A 4H-SiC Schottky diode has been characterized as a proton-flux-monitoring detector and dosimeter under proton beams for proton therapy. The diode was composed of an epitaxial film grown on 4H-SiC n+-type substrate equipped with a gold Schottky contact. The diode was embedded in a tissue-equivalent epoxy resin and then characterized in terms of capacitance vs. voltage (C-V) and current vs. voltage (I-V) characteristics in the dark in the range of 0–40 V. The dark currents at room temperature are in the order of 1 pA, while the doping and active thicknesses extracted from the C-V are 2.5 × 1015 cm−3 and 2–4 μm, respectively. Proton beam tests have been carried out at the Proton Therapy Center of the Trento Institute for Fundamental Physics and Applications (TIFPA-INFN). They have been carried out with energies and extraction currents of 83–220 MeV and 1–10 nA, respectively, as typical for proton therapy applications, corresponding to dose rates in the range of 5 mGy/s to 2.7 Gy/s. The I-V characteristics measured under proton beam irradiation at the lowest dose rate showed a typical diode photocurrent response and a signal-to-noise ratio well above 10. Investigations with null bias evidenced a very good performance in terms of the diode’s sensitivity, fast rise and decay times and response stability. The diode’s sensitivity was in agreement with the expected theoretical values, and its response was linear throughout the whole investigated dose rate range. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Nuclear Physics: Effects of Radiation on Materials)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 6747 KiB  
Article
In Vivo Radiobiological Investigations with the TOP-IMPLART Proton Beam on a Medulloblastoma Mouse Model
by Daniela Giovannini, Cinzia De Angelis, Maria Denise Astorino, Emiliano Fratini, Evaristo Cisbani, Giulia Bazzano, Alessandro Ampollini, Massimo Piccinini, Enrico Nichelatti, Emiliano Trinca, Paolo Nenzi, Mariateresa Mancuso, Luigi Picardi, Carmela Marino, Concetta Ronsivalle and Simonetta Pazzaglia
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2023, 24(9), 8281; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24098281 - 5 May 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2168
Abstract
Protons are now increasingly used to treat pediatric medulloblastoma (MB) patients. We designed and characterized a setup to deliver proton beams for in vivo radiobiology experiments at a TOP-IMPLART facility, a prototype of a proton-therapy linear accelerator developed at the ENEA Frascati Research [...] Read more.
Protons are now increasingly used to treat pediatric medulloblastoma (MB) patients. We designed and characterized a setup to deliver proton beams for in vivo radiobiology experiments at a TOP-IMPLART facility, a prototype of a proton-therapy linear accelerator developed at the ENEA Frascati Research Center, with the goal of assessing the feasibility of TOP-IMPLART for small animal proton therapy research. Mice bearing Sonic-Hedgehog (Shh)-dependent MB in the flank were irradiated with protons to test whether irradiation could be restricted to a specific depth in the tumor tissue and to compare apoptosis induced by the same dose of protons or photons. In addition, the brains of neonatal mice at postnatal day 5 (P5), representing a very small target, were irradiated with 6 Gy of protons with two different collimated Spread-Out Bragg Peaks (SOBPs). Apoptosis was visualized by immunohistochemistry for the apoptotic marker caspase-3-activated, and quantified by Western blot. Our findings proved that protons could be delivered to the upper part while sparing the deepest part of MB. In addition, a comparison of the effectiveness of protons and photons revealed a very similar increase in the expression of cleaved caspase-3. Finally, by using a very small target, the brain of P5-neonatal mice, we demonstrated that the proton irradiation field reached the desired depth in brain tissue. Using the TOP-IMPLART accelerator we established setup and procedures for proton irradiation, suitable for translational preclinical studies. This is the first example of in vivo experiments performed with a “full-linac” proton-therapy accelerator. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Challenges of Radiation Biology for Cancer Management 2.0)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 4288 KiB  
Article
Optically Stimulated Luminescent Response of the LiMgPO4 Silicone Foils to Protons and Its Dependence on Proton Energy
by Michał Sądel, Leszek Grzanka, Jan Swakoń, Jakub Baran, Jan Gajewski and Paweł Bilski
Materials 2023, 16(5), 1978; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16051978 - 28 Feb 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1967
Abstract
Modern radiotherapy (RT) techniques, such as proton therapy, require more and more sophisticated dosimetry methods and materials. One of the newly developed technologies is based on flexible sheets made of a polymer, with the embedded optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) material in the form [...] Read more.
Modern radiotherapy (RT) techniques, such as proton therapy, require more and more sophisticated dosimetry methods and materials. One of the newly developed technologies is based on flexible sheets made of a polymer, with the embedded optically stimulated luminescence (OSL) material in the form of powder (LiMgPO4, LMP) and a self-developed optical imaging setup. The detector properties were evaluated to study its potential application in the proton treatment plan verification for eyeball cancer. The data showed a well-known effect of lower luminescent efficiency of the LMP material response to proton energy. The efficiency parameter depends on a given material and radiation quality parameters. Therefore, the detailed knowledge of material efficiency is crucial in establishing a calibration method for detectors exposed to mixed radiation fields. Thus, in the present study, the prototype of the LMP-based silicone foil material was tested with monoenergetic uniform proton beams of various initial kinetic energies constituting the so-called spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP). The irradiation geometry was also modelled using the Monte Carlo particle transport codes. Several beam quality parameters, including dose and the kinetic energy spectrum, were scored. Finally, the obtained results were used to correct the relative luminescence efficiency response of the LMP foils for monoenergetic and spread-out proton beams. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop