Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (94)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = prostate ablation

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
13 pages, 3444 KB  
Article
First-in-Human Phase II Clinical Trial of Multiplex IntraTumoral Immunotherapy (MITI) in Patients with Metastatic Solid Cancer (Abscopal 5001 Trial)
by David G. Bostwick, Melanie M. Wilk, Brian R. Bostwick, Norman Miller, Eugene C. Rajaratnam, Junqi Qian, Peter M. Rydesky and Peter J. Littrup
Cancers 2025, 17(18), 2990; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17182990 - 12 Sep 2025
Viewed by 582
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Little is known about the synergy between intratumoral immunotherapy and cancer ablation. We conducted a Phase II Trial (Abscopal 5001 trial; NCT04713371) in patients with metastatic solid cancer to assess the safety and efficacy of cryoablation with concurrent injection of RPT-01-5001 (combination [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Little is known about the synergy between intratumoral immunotherapy and cancer ablation. We conducted a Phase II Trial (Abscopal 5001 trial; NCT04713371) in patients with metastatic solid cancer to assess the safety and efficacy of cryoablation with concurrent injection of RPT-01-5001 (combination of low-dose checkpoint inhibitors and cyclophosphamide), a treatment process referred to as Multiplex Intratumoral Immunotherapy (MITITM). Methods: Twelve patients with metastatic cancer who had failed standard therapy and one with sacral chordoma received at least one intratumoral treatment of MITI preceded by 3–5 days of oral low-dose cyclophosphamide. MITI consisted of CT-guided cryoablation followed by intratumoral injection of RPT-01-5001. GM-CSF was subcutaneously administered daily for four weeks. Treatment was repeated every four weeks if the tumor burden remained stable or reduced, as noted by the iRECIST criteria. These criteria were modified when follow-up biopsies revealed pathology with minimal or no cancer, despite persistent suspicious masses on imaging. Results: Cancers included prostate (four patients), sarcoma (two), and one each of breast, colon, bladder, uterine cervix, tongue, kidney, and sacral chordoma. Eight patients received three cycles of treatment, two received two, and three received one. All patients tolerated the procedure well and were discharged within 2 h. The adverse event rate was 69%, all of which were grade 1 or 2, except for two grade 3 cases with delayed cryosurgical complications (15%). At completion of up to three cycles of treatment, a complete response (iCR) was observed in one patient (7.7%), partial response (iPR) in four patients (30.8%), and stable disease (iSD) in five (38.5%), with a disease control rate (iDCR) of 77%. Disparity between post-treatment imaging and pathologic findings was observed in four patients (positive vs. negative, respectively), requiring modification of the iRECIST criteria in favor of pathology. The best response ranged from 0 to 91%, with a mean for responding patients of 38%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were 5.4 months (1.8 to 23.1 months); and median overall survival (OS) was 20.9 months (9.1 to 22.8 months). The injection site cancer response was observed in nine (69%) patients, and the distal abscopal effect was seen in four (31%), including one sarcoma patient with a complete abscopal response of lung metastases and one bladder cancer patient with biopsy-confirmed complete resolution of lung and liver metastases. Conclusions: MITI with RPT-01-5001 is safe and highly feasible, providing 77% disease control and 31% of the abscopal effect in patients with metastatic cancer who have failed standard therapies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Metastasis)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 2048 KB  
Systematic Review
Oncological Efficacy and Safety of Minimally Invasive Focal and Whole-Gland Interventions in the Treatment of Low- and Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Benjamin Skribek, Anett Szabó, Júlia Ács, Bianca Golzio Navarro Cavalcante, Boglárka Dorina Sipos, Péter Hegyi, Péter Mátrai, Péter Nyirády, Nándor Ács, Attila Majoros and Pál Ákos Deák
Cancers 2025, 17(17), 2863; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17172863 - 30 Aug 2025
Viewed by 1466
Abstract
Background and objective: Minimally invasive interventions, including irreversible electroporation (IRE), cryoablation, and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), offer promising alternatives for the treatment of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. We aimed to evaluate the oncological efficacy and safety of these treatments. Methods: A systematic [...] Read more.
Background and objective: Minimally invasive interventions, including irreversible electroporation (IRE), cryoablation, and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU), offer promising alternatives for the treatment of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer. We aimed to evaluate the oncological efficacy and safety of these treatments. Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Central, and EMBASE was conducted up to 5 January 2025, according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Recurrence, complication, survival, biochemical, and retreatment rates were evaluated, with risk of bias assessed using the Risk of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) and Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tools. Results: 85 studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 42 prospective cohort studies, 36 retrospective cohort studies, six registries, and one randomized controlled trial. Whole-gland HIFU showed significantly lower recurrence (15%) and postoperative mean PSA levels (0.68 ng/mL) than focal HIFU (24%, 2.81 ng/mL). Recurrence rates were similar for focal vs. extended IRE (30% vs. 26%) and focal vs. whole-gland cryoablation (18% vs. 13%). In-field and out-of-field recurrence rates were similar across treatment modalities (5–15%). Retreatment rates were low, with 6–7% of patients receiving a second ablation and 2–8% progressing to radical or hormonal therapy. Major complications were consistently rare. One-year biochemical recurrence-free survival (BRFS) exceeded 95%, and five-year BRFS approached 80% for HIFU and cryoablation. Conclusions: Minimally invasive focal and whole-gland therapies are safe and effective for treating low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer, with high survival and low major complication rates. Notably, whole-gland HIFU achieves superior biochemical control and lower recurrence than focal HIFU, emphasizing the clinical importance of treatment extent. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Systematic Review or Meta-Analysis in Cancer Research)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

10 pages, 248 KB  
Article
Comparative Economic Evaluation of Radical Prostatectomy, Radiation, and Ablative Techniques in the Management of Localized Prostate Cancer
by Mahdi Mottaghi, Alireza Ghoreifi, Sriram Deivasigamani, Eric S. Adams, Sudharshanan Balaji, Michael C. Ivey, Cary N. Robertson, Judd W. Moul, Ryan E. Fecteau and Thomas J. Polascik
Cancers 2025, 17(17), 2814; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17172814 - 28 Aug 2025
Viewed by 658
Abstract
Background: To compare the costs of open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), low-dose brachytherapy (LDBT), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), cryotherapy (Cryo), and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for low/intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa), from the healthcare system perspective. [...] Read more.
Background: To compare the costs of open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), low-dose brachytherapy (LDBT), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), cryotherapy (Cryo), and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for low/intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa), from the healthcare system perspective. Methods: This retrospective, IRB-approved study compared the costs and charges of primary treatment options for localized PCa at Duke University Hospital between January 2018 and December 2019. We identified cases by querying the relevant disease, procedural, and charge codes from Duke Finance. Consecutive cases with NCCN high-risk disease, prior treatment, or missing institutional financial information were excluded. Costs were calculated from the point at which the treatment option was selected until the last treatment session (SBRT and IMRT) or hospital discharge (other modalities). All modalities except RRP were considered technology-intensive. Results: A total of 552 patients with a mean age of 65.0 years met the inclusion criteria. NCCN risk categories included 85 (13%) low, 218 (41%) favorable-intermediate, and 249 (46%) unfavorable-intermediate risk cases. RALP, RRP, Cryo, and HIFU were single-session treatments, whereas IMRT, SBRT, and LDBT were delivered over multiple sessions. IMRT and SBRT were the most expensive modalities, followed by RALP, HIFU, LDBT, Cryo, and RRP. The number of sessions (ρ = 0.55, p < 0.001) and being technology-intensive (ρ = 0.58, p < 0.001) were significantly correlated with treatment costs. Conclusions: In this cohort of PCa patients, treatment costs were highest for IMRT and SBRT, followed by RALP, HIFU, LDBT, Cryo, and RRP. The number of treatment sessions was a significant predictor of higher costs. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

11 pages, 1071 KB  
Article
Real-World Clinical Outcomes of Transperineal Laser Ablation in BPH: A 12-Month Retrospective Analysis
by Yusuf Özlülerden, Kürşat Küçüker, Sinan Çelen, Mesut Berkan Duran, Aykut Başer, Ahmet Baki Yagci and Ömer Levent Tuncay
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(17), 6079; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14176079 - 28 Aug 2025
Viewed by 769
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a prevalent condition in aging men and a major cause of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs). While traditional treatments such as transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) are effective, they are associated with notable morbidity. Ultrasound-guided [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a prevalent condition in aging men and a major cause of lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs). While traditional treatments such as transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) are effective, they are associated with notable morbidity. Ultrasound-guided transperineal laser ablation (TPLA) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative. This study aimed to assess the 12-month efficacy, safety, and functional outcomes of TPLA in patients with LUTS secondary to BPH. Methods: This was a single-center, retrospective observational cohort study including 53 patients with moderate-to-severe LUTS due to BPH who underwent TPLA between November 2021 and May 2024. Baseline and follow-up assessments were conducted at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months, including IPSS, Qmax, PVR, prostate volume (MRI), QoL, IIEF-5, and MSHQ-ED/Bother scores. The procedure was performed under local anesthesia using the EchoLaser™ system, and ablation was guided via real-time transrectal ultrasonography. Results: Statistically significant improvements were observed in IPSS (median decrease from 30 to 13), Qmax (5.5 to 13.0 mL/s), and PVR (200 to 85 mL). Prostate and adenoma volumes decreased by 41.2% and 58.3%, respectively. Quality of life scores improved, and erectile function remained stable. Ejaculatory function improved significantly based on MSHQ-ED and MSHQ-Bother scores. No major complications or conversions to surgery occurred. Conclusions: TPLA appears to be a safe, effective, and minimally invasive treatment modality for LUTS caused by BPH. It offers sustained symptomatic relief, prostate volume reduction, and preservation of sexual function, making it a promising alternative for patients unfit or unwilling to undergo invasive surgery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Trends and Prospects in Urology Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 2043 KB  
Article
Synergistic Efficacy of WST11-VTP and P-Selectin-Targeted Nanotherapy in a Preclinical Prostate Cancer Model
by Lucas Nogueira, Ricardo Alvim, Hanan Baker, Karan Nagar, Jasmine Thomas, Laura Alvim, Kwanghee Kim, Daniel A. Heller, Augusto Reis, Avigdor Scherz and Jonathan Coleman
Cancers 2025, 17(14), 2361; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17142361 - 16 Jul 2025
Viewed by 864
Abstract
Objective: Radical therapies are associated with significant morbidity in patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa). While advances in nuclear magnetic resonance techniques have enabled the development of focal ablation procedures that can selectively destroy tumors, preserve the gland and surrounding structures, and minimize [...] Read more.
Objective: Radical therapies are associated with significant morbidity in patients with localized prostate cancer (PCa). While advances in nuclear magnetic resonance techniques have enabled the development of focal ablation procedures that can selectively destroy tumors, preserve the gland and surrounding structures, and minimize side effects, existing vascular-targeted photodynamic therapy (VTP) and nanodrug therapies often face limitations, such as recurrence and insufficient drug concentration at the tumor site. This study investigated a novel approach that combines VTP with systemic treatment using drug-loaded nanoparticles in a murine model, demonstrating substantial advancements beyond current monotherapies. Methods: SCID (severe combined immunodeficiency) mice were engrafted with androgen-sensitive prostate tumor cells (LNCaP-AR) and treated with a combination of VTP and two different drugs linked to fucoidan nanoparticles (Enzalutamide and Paclitaxel). Experiments were performed using different cohorts: the evaluation of oncological effect, the administration time and concentration of systemic therapy, a comparison of efficacy between VTP and radiotherapy, and the induction of the abscopal effect in untreated synchronous tumors. Results: The groups that received combination therapy showed better tumor control. After eight weeks, the recurrence-free survival rates were 87.5%, 62.5%, and 50% in the VTP + N-PAC, VTP + N-ENZ, and VTP monotherapy groups, respectively (p < 0.05). There was a significant difference in the intra-tumoral concentration of nanodrugs between the groups with combined treatment and monotherapy. After two weeks, the monotherapy groups showed almost total elimination of the drugs, whereas in the combined therapy groups, this concentration remained high, starting to decrease after three weeks (p < 0.05). Treatment with nanodrugs associated with VTP showed superior oncological benefits compared to radiotherapy alone or in combination with other therapies. The abscopal effect on synchronous tumors was not demonstrated with VTP alone or in combination with nanodrugs. Conclusions: Combining vascular photodynamic therapy with nanodrugs was highly effective in treating a prostate tumor model, leading to increased survival and a reduced risk of tumor recurrence. This approach significantly advances beyond existing VTP and nanodrug therapies by improving tumor control, ensuring sustained intra-tumoral drug concentration, and yielding superior oncological outcomes. Our results suggest that this therapy is a potential treatment option for prostate tumors treated with VTP in future clinical trials. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advancements in Molecular Research of Prostate Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 293 KB  
Article
Oncological and Functional Outcomes of Hemi-Ablation Versus Focal Ablation for Localized Prostate Cancer Using Irreversible Electroporation
by Michel Suberville, Kai Zhang, Jean Baptiste Woillard, Isabelle Herafa, Dorothée Ducoux, Rachid Nachef, Jeremy Teoh, Gang Zhu, Chi-Fai Ng, Pilar Laguna and Jean de la Rosette
Cancers 2025, 17(13), 2084; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17132084 - 22 Jun 2025
Viewed by 901
Abstract
Background: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a novel ablative treatment modality for localized prostate cancer and aims at achieving oncological control while minimizing the related side effects. We present the functional and oncological outcomes of focal IRE ablation versus hemi-ablation from a single-center [...] Read more.
Background: Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a novel ablative treatment modality for localized prostate cancer and aims at achieving oncological control while minimizing the related side effects. We present the functional and oncological outcomes of focal IRE ablation versus hemi-ablation from a single-center patient series. Methods: Men with histologically confirmed low–intermediate risk prostate cancer received focal IRE ablation or hemi-ablation. All the patients were recommended an MRI-targeted fusion biopsy plus systematic biopsy at 1 year post-IRE ablation. The functional outcomes were measured by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaires. Results: In total, 106 patients were recruited in this study. The median follow-up time was 24 months (IQR 15–36). Overall, 94 patients underwent repeat prostate biopsy at 12 months after IRE. Persistent tumor was detected in 72.2% in the focal ablation group and in 31% in the hemi-ablation group (p < 0.001). Clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason ≥ 3 + 4) was detected in 25% in the focal ablation group and in 8.6% in the hemi-ablation group (p = 0.003). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of IPSS and IIEF at each follow-up time point. Conclusion: For men with localized low–intermediate risk prostate cancer, hemi-IRE ablation treatment displayed better oncological control than focal ablation without compromising on functional or sexual outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Methods and Technologies Development)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 635 KB  
Review
SIU-ICUD: Principles and Outcomes of Focal Therapy in Localized Prostate Cancer
by Alessandro Marquis, Jonathan Olivier, Tavya G. R. Benjamin, Eric Barret, Giancarlo Marra, Claire Deleuze, Lucas Bento, Kae J. Tay, Hashim U. Ahmed, Mark Emberton, Arnauld Villers, Thomas J. Polascik and Ardeshir R. Rastinehad
Soc. Int. Urol. J. 2025, 6(3), 42; https://doi.org/10.3390/siuj6030042 - 10 Jun 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1599
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Focal therapy (FT) for prostate cancer (PCa) is an alternative to radical treatments that aims to balance cancer control and quality of life preservation in well-selected patients. Understanding its general principles and outcomes is key for its widespread adoption and proper implementation. [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Focal therapy (FT) for prostate cancer (PCa) is an alternative to radical treatments that aims to balance cancer control and quality of life preservation in well-selected patients. Understanding its general principles and outcomes is key for its widespread adoption and proper implementation. Methods: The International Consultation on Urological Diseases nominated a committee to review the literature on FT for PCa. A comprehensive PubMed search was conducted to identify articles focused on the different aspects of FT, including patient selection, imaging techniques, treatment modalities, cancer control and safety outcomes, integration with other approaches and future perspectives. Results: FT for PCa was introduced in the 1990s with cryotherapy and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) as pioneering modalities. Though initially guided by transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) and large biopsy templates, FT implementation expanded significantly with the advent of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the validation of the index lesion concept. Appropriate patient selection is key for FT and relies on prostate-specific antigen (PSA) metrics, MRI findings and targeted biopsy information. Multiple energy sources are now available, each with specific technical characteristics. Cancer control rates vary by energy modality, tumor characteristics, and institutional experience, demonstrating comparable outcomes to radical treatments in well-selected patients. The safety profile is excellent, with high rates of urinary continence and sexual function preservation. Post-treatment surveillance integrates PSA measurements, imaging, and histological assessment. Future directions for further FT adoption include the availability of long-term data, protocol standardization and technological improvements to enhance patient selection and treatment planning and delivery. Conclusions: FT is a valuable therapeutic option for selected patients with localized PCa, demonstrating promising oncological outcomes and better functional preservation compared to radical treatments. Understanding its principles and technical aspects is essential for offering comprehensive PCa care. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 603 KB  
Review
SIU-ICUD: Focal Therapy for PCa — The Technique
by Lara Rodriguez-Sanchez, Thomas J. Polascik, Kara Watts, Peter Ka-Fung Chiu, Mark Emberton, Behfar Ehdaie, Hashim U. Ahmed, Andre Abreu, Ardeshir R. Rastinehad and Rafael Sanchez-Salas
Soc. Int. Urol. J. 2025, 6(3), 38; https://doi.org/10.3390/siuj6030038 - 7 Jun 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1693
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Focal therapy (FT) and technology are closely connected. Advanced imaging allows for precise identification of the index lesion, enabling the targeted use of various thermal and non-thermal energy sources through different approaches, with specific techniques tailored to lesion location and operator expertise. [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Focal therapy (FT) and technology are closely connected. Advanced imaging allows for precise identification of the index lesion, enabling the targeted use of various thermal and non-thermal energy sources through different approaches, with specific techniques tailored to lesion location and operator expertise. This personalized approach enhances both safety and effectiveness, facilitating customized treatment planning. Methods: The International Consultation on Urological Diseases formed a committee to review the current literature on FT for prostate cancer (PCa), focusing specifically on the technique. Following in-depth discussions, the committee chose a “by lesion” approach rather than the traditional “by energy” approach to structure the review. A comprehensive PubMed search was conducted to gather relevant articles on the various energy modalities and procedural approaches used in FT for PCa. Results: Lesions in the apex, anterior, and posterior regions of the prostate can be accessed through several FT approaches, each associated with specific energy modalities and techniques. The transrectal approach utilizes high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) and focal laser ablation (FLA), while the transperineal approach is compatible with energy sources such as cryotherapy, irreversible electroporation (IRE), brachytherapy, and FLA. The transurethral approach supports methods such as transurethral ultrasound ablation (TULSA). Each approach offers distinct advantages based on lesion location, treatment area, and energy modality. The choice of technique evaluated the safety and efficacy of each energy source and approach based on specific treatment areas within the prostate, highlighting the need for robust research across lesion locations and modalities, rather than focusing solely on each modality for a specific region. Conclusions: FT is rapidly advancing with new energy sources, technological improvements, and increasing operator expertise. To further optimize FT, research should prioritize evaluating the safety and effectiveness of different energy sources for various lesion locations, focusing on the treatment area rather than the energy modality itself. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2465 KB  
Review
Post-Treatment Imaging in Focal Therapy: Understanding TARGET and PI-FAB Scoring Systems
by Haidy Megahed, Samuel Tremblay, Jason Koehler, Simon Han, Ahmed Hamimi, Aytekin Oto and Abhinav Sidana
Diagnostics 2025, 15(11), 1328; https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15111328 - 26 May 2025
Viewed by 1208
Abstract
As the adoption of focal therapy (FT) for prostate cancer (PCa) grows, the demand for accurate post-treatment imaging to monitor outcomes and detect residual or recurrent cancer increases. Traditional diagnostic systems like the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) are ill-suited for [...] Read more.
As the adoption of focal therapy (FT) for prostate cancer (PCa) grows, the demand for accurate post-treatment imaging to monitor outcomes and detect residual or recurrent cancer increases. Traditional diagnostic systems like the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) are ill-suited for post-FT evaluations due to treatment-induced tissue changes. MRI-based scoring systems specific for evaluation after FT have been developed to address these challenges and improve post-FT imaging accuracy by distinguishing benign alterations from recurrence. The currently developed scoring systems are Transatlantic Recommendations for Prostate Gland Evaluation with MRI after Focal Therapy (TARGET) and Prostate Imaging after Focal Ablation (PI-FAB). In this review, we describe and compare these two systems. These scoring systems standardize imaging assessments, enhance follow-up care, and support clinical decision-making. While promising, TARGET and PI-FAB require further large-scale validation to confirm their utility. Nevertheless, they represent critical advances in optimizing PCa management, particularly for patients undergoing FT, by improving diagnostic accuracy and guiding treatment decisions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Prostate Cancer Imaging and Biopsy Techniques)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1085 KB  
Article
Echolaser Focal Treatment for Prostate Cancer Guided by Fiducial Marker Placement
by Timoleon Granitsas, Ioannis Anastassakis, Stamatios Brempos and Kyriakos Brempos
Cancers 2025, 17(10), 1707; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17101707 - 20 May 2025
Viewed by 1040
Abstract
Background: Focal therapy has emerged as a viable alternative to radical prostate cancer treatment, offering oncologic control while minimizing morbidity. EchoLaser focal laser ablation (FLA) is a minimally invasive technique that utilizes high-precision laser energy for tumor destruction. This study evaluated the [...] Read more.
Background: Focal therapy has emerged as a viable alternative to radical prostate cancer treatment, offering oncologic control while minimizing morbidity. EchoLaser focal laser ablation (FLA) is a minimally invasive technique that utilizes high-precision laser energy for tumor destruction. This study evaluated the oncologic outcomes, procedural efficiency, and safety of EchoLaser focal therapy, comparing fiducial-assisted (FM+) and non-fiducial (FM−) approaches. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Athens Medical Center, Greece, including 50 patients with localized prostate cancer treated with EchoLaser therapy. Patients were categorized into FM+ (n = 31) and FM− (n = 19) groups. Oncologic control (MRI and PSA levels at six months), procedural efficiency (operative time), and safety (adverse events) were assessed. Results: At six months, 80% of patients (n = 40) had no residual disease on MRI, while 20% (n = 10) showed persistent or recurrent tumor activity. PSA levels declined from 10.26 ± 14.99 ng/mL to 2.70 ± 2.67 ng/mL, reflecting a 74% median reduction. Procedure time was shorter in FM+ patients (33.48 ± 2.41 min vs. 45.79 ± 2.92 min, p < 0.01). Adverse events occurred only in the FM− group, including one case of urinary retention. Conclusions: FLA with EchoLaser using fiducial marker enhances procedural efficiency and could have a positive impact on oncologic control. These findings suggest that fiducial markers should be integrated into focal therapy protocols. Longer follow-up studies are needed to confirm the long-term outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Minimally Invasive Therapies in Urologic Cancers)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1347 KB  
Article
The Impact of MISTs on Australian BPO Surgical Trends
by David Armany, Lequang Vo, Kathleen Lockhart, Tania Hossack, David Ende, Simon Bariol, Sriskanthan Baskaranathan and Henry Woo
Soc. Int. Urol. J. 2025, 6(2), 32; https://doi.org/10.3390/siuj6020032 - 17 Apr 2025
Viewed by 712
Abstract
Background/Objectives: To evaluate the impact of Minimally Invasive Surgical Therapies (MISTs) on Australian trends for surgeries treating lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs) caused by benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). The recent adoption of the prostatic urethral lift (PUL) and water vapour thermal therapy [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: To evaluate the impact of Minimally Invasive Surgical Therapies (MISTs) on Australian trends for surgeries treating lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTSs) caused by benign prostatic obstruction (BPO). The recent adoption of the prostatic urethral lift (PUL) and water vapour thermal therapy (such as Rezum) into the Medicare Benefits Scheme (MBS) item schedule on the 1 March 2024 has likely had an impact on Australian surgical trends and we aim to describe their impact on the use of other commonly offered BPO-related surgeries. Methods: This study analyses population-adjusted rates of BPO-related surgeries in Australia from January 2004 to September 2024 using publicly available online Medicare Statistics and Census Data. Independent t-tests and significance levels were calculated to compare procedure rates before and after the introduction of PUL and Rezum in March 2024. Results: In total, 301,648 BPO surgical procedures were claimed under MBS in Australia from January 2004 to September 2024, with transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) being the most common (78%). Procedure rates increased overall with significant shifts in treatment preference: TURP rates have steadily declined in Australia after peaking in 2009 (123.4 per 100,000 adult men), whilst photo-selective vaporisation of the prostate (PVP) and enucleation have risen. Following the introduction of PUL and Rezum on 1 March 2024, enucleation and simple prostatectomy rates increased, while Transurethral needle ablation (TUNA) and urethral and prostatic prosthesis (UPP) decreased. TURP rates were unaffected. Conclusions: Throughout the past two decades, BPO surgical trends in Australia have shifted, with TURP declining as PVP and enucleation have risen. The 2024 MBS listing for PUL and Rezum has boosted their uptake whilst reducing both TUNA and UPP claims. Simple prostatectomy rates remained stable. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 232 KB  
Review
Surveillance After Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Comprehensive Review
by Jason Koehler, Simon Han, Samuel Tremblay, Wei-Wen Hsu, Bora Kalaycioglu, Aytekin Oto and Abhinav Sidana
Cancers 2025, 17(8), 1337; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17081337 - 16 Apr 2025
Viewed by 1434
Abstract
Focal Therapy (FT) is an emerging treatment modality for prostate cancer (PCa). Due to its novelty, the research exploring how patients should be followed-up after treatment is limited. There is currently no established role for non-prostate-specific-antigen (PSA) biomarkers and PSMA PET. However, a [...] Read more.
Focal Therapy (FT) is an emerging treatment modality for prostate cancer (PCa). Due to its novelty, the research exploring how patients should be followed-up after treatment is limited. There is currently no established role for non-prostate-specific-antigen (PSA) biomarkers and PSMA PET. However, a combination of PSA testing, multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), and systematic and targeted biopsies should routinely be used for surveillance after FT. PSA values that rise 1.0 ng/mL over the nadir after twelve months or rise 1.5 ng/mL over nadir after twenty-four to thirty-six months should raise suspicion for recurrence. The standard imaging technique is mpMRI, but it can often be difficult to interpret after FT, so using a scoring system such as prostate imaging after focal ablation (PI-FAB) or the transatlantic recommendations for prostate gland evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging after focal therapy (TARGET) allows for greater consistency between readers. This review seeks to summarize the current literature regarding surveillance after FT as it relates to biomarkers, imaging, biopsies, and consensus statements. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Focus on Focal Therapy for Prostate Cancer)
28 pages, 4033 KB  
Article
Advancing Prostate Cancer Diagnostics: A ConvNeXt Approach to Multi-Class Classification in Underrepresented Populations
by Declan Ikechukwu Emegano, Mubarak Taiwo Mustapha, Ilker Ozsahin, Dilber Uzun Ozsahin and Berna Uzun
Bioengineering 2025, 12(4), 369; https://doi.org/10.3390/bioengineering12040369 - 1 Apr 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 979
Abstract
Prostate cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide, with diagnostic challenges magnified in underrepresented regions like sub-Saharan Africa. This study introduces a novel application of ConvNeXt, an advanced convolutional neural network architecture, for multi-class classification of prostate histopathological images [...] Read more.
Prostate cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality worldwide, with diagnostic challenges magnified in underrepresented regions like sub-Saharan Africa. This study introduces a novel application of ConvNeXt, an advanced convolutional neural network architecture, for multi-class classification of prostate histopathological images into normal, benign, and malignant categories. The dataset, sourced from a tertiary healthcare institution in Nigeria, represents a typically underserved African population, addressing critical disparities in global diagnostic research. We also used the ProstateX dataset (2017) from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) to validate our result. A comprehensive pipeline was developed, leveraging advanced data augmentation, Grad-CAM for interpretability, and an ablation study to enhance model optimization and robustness. The ConvNeXt model achieved an accuracy of 98%, surpassing the performance of traditional CNNs (ResNet50, 93%; EfficientNet, 94%; DenseNet, 92%) and transformer-based models (ViT, 88%; CaiT, 86%; Swin Transformer, 95%; RegNet, 94%). Also, using the ProstateX dataset, the ConvNeXt model recorded 87.2%, 85.7%, 86.4%, and 0.92 as accuracy, recall, F1 score, and AUC, respectively, as validation results. Its hybrid architecture combines the strengths of CNNs and transformers, enabling superior feature extraction. Grad-CAM visualizations further enhance explainability, bridging the gap between computational predictions and clinical trust. Ablation studies demonstrated the contributions of data augmentation, optimizer selection, and learning rate tuning to model performance, highlighting its robustness and adaptability for deployment in low-resource settings. This study advances equitable health care by addressing the lack of regional representation in diagnostic datasets and employing a clinically aligned three-class classification approach. Combining high performance, interpretability, and scalability, this work establishes a foundation for future research on diverse and underrepresented populations, fostering global inclusivity in cancer diagnostics. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 3123 KB  
Article
Loss of ING3 in the Prostate Leads to Activation of DNA Damage Repair Markers
by Viktor Lang, Lisa Barones, ShiTing Misaki Hu, Fatemeh Hashemi, Karen Blote, Karl Riabowol and Dieter Fink
Cancers 2025, 17(6), 1037; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17061037 - 20 Mar 2025
Viewed by 2856
Abstract
Background/Objectives: The inhibitor of growth family member 3 (ING3) acts as an epigenetic reader through physical interactions with histone-modifying enzymes and subsequent chromatin remodelling processes. It is involved in various cellular functions, such as cell cycle control, cell growth, and apoptosis. Although ING3 [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: The inhibitor of growth family member 3 (ING3) acts as an epigenetic reader through physical interactions with histone-modifying enzymes and subsequent chromatin remodelling processes. It is involved in various cellular functions, such as cell cycle control, cell growth, and apoptosis. Although ING3 was assigned tumour suppressor candidate status in some types of cancers, including prostate cancer, some studies suggest it acts to promote growth. To address these contradictory reports regarding its role in the initiation and progression of prostate cancer, we specifically addressed the question of whether ablation of ING3 in the mouse prostate is sufficient to initiate malignant transformation of the prostate and support its (candidate) tumour suppressor status. Methods: To generate the prostate-specific Ing3 knockout mouse, paternal inheritance of the PB-Cre4 transgene was used, while for the generation of a global knockout control, a female mouse harbouring the PB-Cre4 transgene was utilized. To determine the recombination efficiency of the Cre-LoxP system in the prostate at the Ing3 locus, a duplex probe-based digital PCR assay capable of counting undisrupted Ing3 copies was designed. The impact of DNA recombination on the protein level was investigated by immunohistochemical staining of prostate tissue samples. Results: In the prostate-specific knockout, digital PCR analysis revealed mosaic gene deletion. We found recombination efficiencies in the anterior, dorsolateral, and ventral prostate lobes ranging from approximately 15 to 30%. ING3 staining in the prostate was faint with no detectable differences in signal intensity between the knockout specimen and wild-type controls. This low ING3 expression in the prostate is consistent with observations of X-gal staining of an Ing3-LacZ reporter allele. Immunohistochemistry showed increased expression of DNA-damage-associated markers γH2AX and 53BP1. However, no gross anatomical abnormalities or prostate intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN) lesions in the prostate of tissue-specific knockout animals compared to wild-type controls were observed. Conclusions: Altogether, our data provide evidence that disruption of ING3 expression in prostate cells does not lead to malignant transformation and challenges the idea that ING3 acts primarily in a tumour-suppressive manner. Furthermore, this work supports the crucial role of ING3 in maintaining genomic stability, and we confirmed the embryonic lethal phenotype of homozygous Ing3 null mice that is rescued by ectopic expression of ING3. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 4235 KB  
Article
The Use of PI-FAB Score in Evaluating mpMRI After Focal Ablation of Prostate Cancer: Is It Reliable? Inter-Reader Agreement in a Tertiary Care Referral University Hospital
by Elena Bertelli, Michele Vizzi, Martina Legato, Rossella Nicoletti, Sebastiano Paolucci, Ron Ruzga, Simona Giovannelli, Francesco Sessa, Sergio Serni, Lorenzo Masieri, Riccardo Campi, Emanuele Neri, Simone Agostini and Vittorio Miele
Cancers 2025, 17(6), 1031; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17061031 - 20 Mar 2025
Viewed by 1039
Abstract
Background/Purpose: to assess the inter-reader agreement of the PIFAB (Prostate Imaging after Focal Ablation) score, a new MRI-based standardized system for evaluating post-focal therapy prostate mpMRI, among radiologists in a single large cohort of patients treated with focal therapy (HIFU) in a tertiary [...] Read more.
Background/Purpose: to assess the inter-reader agreement of the PIFAB (Prostate Imaging after Focal Ablation) score, a new MRI-based standardized system for evaluating post-focal therapy prostate mpMRI, among radiologists in a single large cohort of patients treated with focal therapy (HIFU) in a tertiary care referral University Hospital. Methods: In total, 68 consecutive patients who underwent HIFU were included in this single-center retrospective observational study. A total of 109 post-HIFU follow-up mpMRIs were evaluated by three radiologists with varying levels of experience (12, 8, and 3 years, respectively). All patients underwent their first follow-up mpMRI at 6 months post-treatment, with 30 patients receiving additional evaluations at 18 months and 11 at 30 months. Results: The patients had a mean age of 70.6 ± 8.31 years, a mean pre-treatment PSA (prostate-specific antigen) of 7.85 ± 1.21 ng/mL, and a mean post-treatment PSA of 4.64 ± 4.2 ng/mL. The inter-reader agreement for PI-FAB among the three radiologists showed a Gwet’s AC2 value of 0.941 (95% confidence interval: 0.904–0.978, p < 0.0001). For the most experienced radiologist, at the 6-month follow-up 64 (94.14%) patients were scored as PI-FAB 1, 1 (1.47%) as PI-FAB 2, and 3 (4.41%) as PI-FAB 3. At the 18-month and 30-month follow-ups all patients were scored as PI-FAB 1 (no suspicion of recurrence). Conclusions: Our study demonstrates excellent inter-reader agreement among radiologists with varying levels of experience, confirming that the PI-FAB score is highly reproducible when evaluating post-treatment mpMRI scans. The low rate of PI-FAB 2 and PI-FAB 3 lesions observed at the first follow-up, coupled with the absence of significant recurrence in subsequent evaluations, suggests that HIFU is a reliable technique for prostate cancer treatment in selected patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Imaging in Oncology: Recent Advances)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop