Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (14)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = pradofloxacin

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
15 pages, 304 KB  
Article
Antimicrobial Susceptibility and Fluoroquinolone Resistance Patterns of Pseudomonas aeruginosa Isolated from Canine Otitis Externa in Romania
by Ionela Popa, Ionica Iancu, Vlad Iorgoni, Alexandru Gligor, Kalman Imre, Emil Tîrziu, Timea Bochiș, Călin Pop, Janos Degi, Andrei Ivan, Michael Dahma, Ana-Maria Plotuna, Gabriel Orghici, Viorel Herman and Ileana Nichita
Antibiotics 2026, 15(2), 144; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics15020144 - 2 Feb 2026
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1060
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Canine otitis externa (OE) is frequently complicated by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) infections, which are often associated with treatment failure due to intrinsic and acquired antimicrobial resistance. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of P. aeruginosa [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Canine otitis externa (OE) is frequently complicated by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) infections, which are often associated with treatment failure due to intrinsic and acquired antimicrobial resistance. This study aimed to assess the prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility of P. aeruginosa isolates from dogs with OE in Timiș County, Romania, with a focus on aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones, to provide region-specific, clinically relevant data and address potential public health implications. Methods: Exudate samples were collected from 435 dogs diagnosed with OE across multiple veterinary clinics between 2022 and 2025. P. aeruginosa isolates were identified using standard culture methods, and antimicrobial susceptibility was determined using the VITEK® 2 Compact system according to CLSI VET01, Fifth Edition (2018) guidelines. Tested antibiotics included amikacin, gentamicin, enrofloxacin, marbofloxacin, and pradofloxacin. Resistance profiles were analyzed at both the individual antibiotic and class levels. Results:P. aeruginosa was isolated in 14.0% (61/435) of dogs. All isolates were susceptible to amikacin and gentamicin, whereas resistance to enrofloxacin and marbofloxacin was 27.9%, and pradofloxacin resistance reached 63.9%. A total of 24.6% of isolates were susceptible to all tested antibiotics. The most frequent multidrug-resistant combination among fluoroquinolones was ENR (R) + MAR (R) + PRA (R), observed in 23.0% of isolates. Conclusions: This study provides recent, region-specific data on P. aeruginosa prevalence and antimicrobial susceptibility in canine OE, offering clinically relevant insights into aminoglycoside and fluoroquinolone resistance. The findings highlight the potential public health significance of resistant P. aeruginosa strains at the human–animal interface and underscore the importance of antimicrobial stewardship in veterinary practice. Full article
29 pages, 3984 KB  
Article
Comparative In Vitro Killing of Key Bovine Respiratory Bacterial Pathogens by Pradofloxacin and Eight Other Veterinary Antimicrobial Agents
by Joseph M. Blondeau and Shantelle D. Fitch
Microorganisms 2025, 13(12), 2681; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13122681 - 25 Nov 2025
Viewed by 699
Abstract
Pradofloxacin is a third-generation dual enzyme targeting bactericidal veterinary fluoroquinolone, recently approved for use in cattle for bovine respiratory disease, which is active against Gram-positive/negative, atypical and anaerobic bacteria. We compared in vitro killing by pradofloxacin to that by ceftiofur, danofloxacin, enrofloxacin, florfenicol, [...] Read more.
Pradofloxacin is a third-generation dual enzyme targeting bactericidal veterinary fluoroquinolone, recently approved for use in cattle for bovine respiratory disease, which is active against Gram-positive/negative, atypical and anaerobic bacteria. We compared in vitro killing by pradofloxacin to that by ceftiofur, danofloxacin, enrofloxacin, florfenicol, marbofloxacin, tildipirosin, tilmicosin and tulathromycin against bovine isolates of Mannheimia haemolytica and Pasteurella multocida over a range of bacterial densities (106–109 cfu/mL). Drug concentrations used in the kill assays included the minimum inhibitory and mutant prevention drug concentrations and maximum serum and maximum tissue drug concentrations. Regardless of bacteria density tested and drug concentration used, pradofloxacin consistently killed as many or more (but not fewer) bacterial cells than any other drug tested against M. haemolytica strains. At the 108–109 cfu/mL densities, pradofloxacin killed 99–99.9%, 100% and 100% of bacterial cells at the MPC, maximum serum and maximum tissue drug concentrations, respectively, following 24 h of drug exposure. Indeed, pradofloxacin killed 99.9–99.99% of cells following 30–60 min of exposure to the maximum serum concentration. Similar trends were seen with killing of P. multocida strains by pradofloxacin. Against high-density bacterial populations, pradofloxacin was rapidly bactericidal and consistently killed more cells than the other agents tested. This manuscript represents the most comprehensive comparative in vitro kill study completed to date. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Insights of the Role of Microorganisms in Bovine Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2671 KB  
Article
Bactericidal Activity of Pradofloxacin and Other Antimicrobials Against Swine Respiratory Bacterial Pathogens
by Joseph M. Blondeau and Shantelle D. Fitch
Pathogens 2025, 14(11), 1171; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14111171 - 17 Nov 2025
Viewed by 801
Abstract
Swine respiratory disease (SRD) is a complex interaction whereby viral infection predisposes the host to secondary bacterial pulmonary invasion, which may be fatal. Antimicrobial agents remain an important therapy and serve to reduce morbidity and mortality in treated animals. Pradofloxacin is the newest [...] Read more.
Swine respiratory disease (SRD) is a complex interaction whereby viral infection predisposes the host to secondary bacterial pulmonary invasion, which may be fatal. Antimicrobial agents remain an important therapy and serve to reduce morbidity and mortality in treated animals. Pradofloxacin is the newest of the veterinary antibiotics to be approved to treat SRD. It is a dual-targeting fluoroquinolone with in vitro and clinical activity against Gram-negative and -positive bacteria, along with atypical agents including anaerobes. In this study, we compared the killing of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, Pasteurella multocida, and Streptococcus suis by pradofloxacin and comparator antibiotics in a 3 h kill assay, using four clinically relevant drug concentrations. Pradofloxacin was bactericidal against the three pathogens, with kill rates ranging from 94.4 to 99.9% (A. pleuropneumoniae) following 15–20 min of exposure to the maximum serum and maximum tissue drug concentration. For P. multocida, the kill rates were 68.7–96.9% following 5–30 min of drug exposure at the maximum serum drug concentration, and 91.7% following 5 min of drug exposure at the maximum tissue drug concentration. For S. suis, pradofloxacin killed 92.4–99.4% and 71.6–97.1% of cells following 60–180 min of drug exposure at the maximum serum and maximum tissue drug concentration, respectively. Pradofloxacin appears to be an important addition to the drugs currently available for treating SRD. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 268 KB  
Article
Effects of Comparative Killing by Pradofloxacin and Seven Other Antimicrobials Against Varying Bacterial Densities of Swine Isolates of Pasteurella multocida
by Joseph M. Blondeau and Shantelle D. Fitch
Microorganisms 2025, 13(2), 221; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms13020221 - 21 Jan 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1556
Abstract
Bacterial killing is important for recovering from infection. Pasteurella multocida is a key bacterial pathogen causing swine respiratory disease and is associated with substantial mortality. Antimicrobial therapy remains an important therapeutic intervention for treating infected animals. Pradofloxacin (fluoroquinolone) is the most recently approved [...] Read more.
Bacterial killing is important for recovering from infection. Pasteurella multocida is a key bacterial pathogen causing swine respiratory disease and is associated with substantial mortality. Antimicrobial therapy remains an important therapeutic intervention for treating infected animals. Pradofloxacin (fluoroquinolone) is the most recently approved antimicrobial agent for treating pigs with swine respiratory disease. We compared in vitro killing of swine P. multocida strains by pradofloxacin in comparison to ceftiofur, enrofloxacin, florfenicol, marbofloxacin, tildipirosin, tilmicosin, and tulathromycin over a range of bacterial densities and four clinically relevant drug concentrations. Pradofloxacin killed 92–96.9% of cells across 106–108 cfu/mL densities at the mutant prevention drug concentration following 2–24 h of drug exposure, 96.9–98.9% of cells across 106–109 cfu/mL at the maximum serum drug concentration following 30 min of drug exposure, increasing to 99.9–100% kill following 12–24 h of drug exposure. At the maximum tissue drug concentration and against bacterial densities of 106–109 cfu/mL, pradofloxacin killed 91.3–99.8% of cells following 2 h of drug exposure, which increased to 99.9–100% kill following 12–24 h of drug exposure. Pradofloxacin was rapidly bactericidal across a range of bacterial densities and at clinically relevant drug concentrations. Pradofloxacin will be an important antibiotic for treating pigs with swine respiratory disease and where clinically indicated. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Veterinary Microbiology)
9 pages, 225 KB  
Communication
Pradofloxacin Minimum Inhibitory Concentration Profiling of Streptococcus suis Isolates: Insights into Antimicrobial Susceptibility in Swine
by Jessica Risser, Ronald Tessman, Don Bade, Orhan Sahin, Maria J. Clavijo, Saumya Dhup and Patrick Hoffmann
Pathogens 2025, 14(1), 88; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens14010088 - 17 Jan 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2322
Abstract
This study evaluated the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of pradofloxacin against various swine respiratory pathogens, including Bordetella bronchiseptica, Glaesserella parasuis, Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, Pasteurella multocida, and Streptococcus suis (S. suis), associated with disease in swine. This research was [...] Read more.
This study evaluated the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of pradofloxacin against various swine respiratory pathogens, including Bordetella bronchiseptica, Glaesserella parasuis, Mycoplasma hyopneumoniae, Pasteurella multocida, and Streptococcus suis (S. suis), associated with disease in swine. This research was conducted in two phases: the initial phase examined isolates from the lungs that could be either commensal or pathogenic, while the second phase focused on systemic S. suis strains that spread from the respiratory tract to the brain. The pradofloxacin MIC values of the second phase were within the MIC range of the initial phase, with MIC50 and MIC90 values highlighting its potential as an effective antimicrobial agent. Quality control data validated the reliability of our MIC findings, with all pradofloxacin MIC values for control organisms within approved ranges. These findings suggest that pradofloxacin has broad-spectrum activity against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria and may serve as a reliable therapeutic option for managing S. suis and other swine respiratory infections. This study highlights pradofloxacin as an alternative antimicrobial therapy for swine respiratory diseases, offering a potential solution amidst rising concerns over antibiotic resistance. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Understanding the Pathogenesis of Streptococcus suis)
10 pages, 261 KB  
Article
Comparison of the Minimum Inhibitory and Mutant Prevention Drug Concentrations for Pradofloxacin and 7 Other Antimicrobial Agents Tested Against Swine Isolates of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae and Pasteurella multocida
by Joseph M. Blondeau and Shantelle D. Fitch
Molecules 2024, 29(22), 5448; https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules29225448 - 19 Nov 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2571
Abstract
Pradofloxacin is a dual targeting, bactericidal fluoroquinolone recently approved for treating bacteria causing swine respiratory disease. Currently, an abundance of in vitro data does not exist for pradofloxacin. We determined the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and mutant prevention concentrations (MPC) of pradofloxacin compared [...] Read more.
Pradofloxacin is a dual targeting, bactericidal fluoroquinolone recently approved for treating bacteria causing swine respiratory disease. Currently, an abundance of in vitro data does not exist for pradofloxacin. We determined the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and mutant prevention concentrations (MPC) of pradofloxacin compared to ceftiofur, enrofloxacin, florfenicol, marbofloxacin, tildipirosin, tilmicosin and tulathromycin against swine isolates of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae and Pasteurella multocida. Overall, pradofloxacin had the lowest MIC and MPC values as compared to the other agents tested. For example, pradofloxacin MIC values for 50%, 90% and 100% of A. pleuropneumoniae strains were ≤0.016 µg/mL, ≤0.016 µg/mL and ≤0.016 µg/mL and for P. multocida were ≤0.016 µg/mL, ≤0.016 µg/mL and 0.031 µg/mL, respectively. The MPC values for 50%, 90% and 100% of A. pleuropneumoniae strains were 0.031 µg/mL, 0.063 µg/mL and 0.125 µg/mL and for P. multocida were ≤0.016 µg/mL, 0.031 µg/mL and 0.0.063 µg/mL, respectively. By MPC testing, all strains were at or below the susceptibility breakpoint. Based on MPC testing, pradofloxacin appears to have a low likelihood for resistance selection. This study represents the most comprehensive in vitro comparison of the above noted drugs and the first report for pradofloxacin and tildipirosin. Full article
14 pages, 2655 KB  
Article
Comparative In Vitro Killing by Pradofloxacin in Comparison to Ceftiofur, Enrofloxacin, Florfenicol, Marbofloxacin, Tildipirosin, Tilmicosin and Tulathromycin against Bovine Respiratory Bacterial Pathogens
by Joseph M. Blondeau and Shantelle D. Fitch
Microorganisms 2024, 12(5), 996; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms12050996 - 15 May 2024
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2720
Abstract
Pradofloxacin is the newest of the veterinary fluoroquinolones to be approved for use in animals—initially companion animals and most recently food animals. It has a broad spectrum of in vitro activity, working actively against Gram-positive/negative, atypical and some anaerobic microorganisms. It simultaneously targets [...] Read more.
Pradofloxacin is the newest of the veterinary fluoroquinolones to be approved for use in animals—initially companion animals and most recently food animals. It has a broad spectrum of in vitro activity, working actively against Gram-positive/negative, atypical and some anaerobic microorganisms. It simultaneously targets DNA gyrase (topoisomerase type II) and topoisomerase type IV, suggesting a lower propensity to select for antimicrobial resistance. The purpose of this study was to determine the rate and extent of bacterial killing by pradofloxacin against bovine strains of Mannheimia haemolytica and Pasteurella multocida, in comparison with several other agents (ceftiofur, enrofloxacin, florfenicol, marbofloxacin, tildipirosin, tilmicosin and tulathromycin) using four clinically relevant drug concentrations: minimum inhibitory and mutant prevention drug concentration, maximum serum and maximum tissue drug concentrations. At the maximum serum and tissue drug concentrations, pradofloxacin killed 99.99% of M. haemolytica cells following 5 min of drug exposure (versus growth to 76% kill rate for the other agents) and 94.1–98.6% of P. multocida following 60–120 min of drug exposure (versus growth to 98.6% kill rate for the other agents). Statistically significant differences in kill rates were seen between the various drugs tested depending on drug concentration and time of sampling after drug exposure. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Bacterial Infections and Antibiotic Resistance in Veterinary Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 252 KB  
Article
Comparative Minimum Inhibitory and Mutant Prevention Drug Concentrations for Pradofloxacin and Seven Other Antimicrobial Agents Tested against Bovine Isolates of Mannheimia haemolytica and Pasteurella multocida
by Joseph M. Blondeau and Shantelle D. Fitch
Pathogens 2024, 13(5), 399; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13050399 - 9 May 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2908
Abstract
Pradofloxacin—a dual-targeting fluoroquinolone—is the most recent approved for use in food animals. Minimum inhibitory and mutant prevention concentration values were determined for pradofloxacin, ceftiofur, enrofloxacin, florfenicol, marbofloxacin, tildipirosin, tilmicosin, and tulathromycin. For M. haemolytica strains, MIC50/90/100 values were ≤0.016/≤0.016/≤0.016 and MPC50/90/100 [...] Read more.
Pradofloxacin—a dual-targeting fluoroquinolone—is the most recent approved for use in food animals. Minimum inhibitory and mutant prevention concentration values were determined for pradofloxacin, ceftiofur, enrofloxacin, florfenicol, marbofloxacin, tildipirosin, tilmicosin, and tulathromycin. For M. haemolytica strains, MIC50/90/100 values were ≤0.016/≤0.016/≤0.016 and MPC50/90/100 values were 0.031/0.063/0.063; for P. multocida strains, the MIC50/90/100 values ≤0.016/≤0.016/0.031 and MPC50/90/100 ≤ 0.016/0.031/0.063 for pradofloxacin. The pradofloxacin Cmax/MIC90 and Cmax/MPC90 values for M. haemolytica and P. multocida strains, respectively, were 212.5 and 53.9 and 212.5 and 109.7. Similarly, AUC24/MIC90 and AUC24/MPC90 for M. haemolytica were 825 and 209.5, and for P. multocida, they were 825 and 425.8. Pradofloxacin would exceed the mutant selection window for >12–16 h. Pradofloxacin appears to have a low likelihood for resistance selection against key bovine respiratory disease bacterial pathogens based on low MIC and MPC values. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Bacterial Pathogens)
5 pages, 193 KB  
Communication
Pradofloxacin for Treatment of Bartonella henselae in Experimentally Inoculated Cats
by Michael R. Lappin and Ronan Fitzgerald
Pathogens 2024, 13(4), 336; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens13040336 - 18 Apr 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3564
Abstract
Bartonella henselae is associated with numerous clinical syndromes in people. Cats are the definitive hosts for B. henselae, develop high levels of bacteremia, and are associated with human infections, particularly in the presence of Ctenocephalides felis. Several antibiotic protocols used for [...] Read more.
Bartonella henselae is associated with numerous clinical syndromes in people. Cats are the definitive hosts for B. henselae, develop high levels of bacteremia, and are associated with human infections, particularly in the presence of Ctenocephalides felis. Several antibiotic protocols used for the treatment of B. henselae infection in cats have failed to clear bacteremia. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and efficacy of a high-dose pradofloxacin protocol to eliminate B. henselae bacteremia. Bartonella henselae infection was initiated in 8 cats by intravenous inoculation of infected feline blood and then pradofloxacin was administered at 7.5 mg/kg, PO, twice daily for 28 days, starting 12 weeks after inoculation. Complete blood cell counts were performed prior to pradofloxacin administration and then every 2 weeks for 10 weeks. Bartonella PCR assay was performed prior to pradofloxacin administration and approximately every 2 weeks for 10 weeks and then weekly for 4 weeks. Methylprednisolone acetate (5 mg/kg) was administered by intramuscular injection to all cats on week 10. The cats remained normal and none developed a hematocrit, platelet count, lymphocyte count, or neutrophil count outside of the normal reference ranges. In the one month prior to pradofloxacin administration, all cats were PCR-positive for Bartonella DNA on at least two of four sample dates; after pradofloxacin administration, all cats were negative for B. henselae DNA in blood on all nine sample dates. The protocol appears to be safe and failure to amplify B. henselae DNA from the blood after the administration of pradofloxacin and one dose of methylprednisolone acetate suggests either an antibiotic effect or the organism was cleared spontaneously. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Expanding Clinical Spectrum of Bartonelloses)
8 pages, 682 KB  
Case Report
First Report of Kocuria kristinae in the Skin of a Cuban Boa (Epicrates angulifer)
by Inês Marques, Nuno Alvura, José Júlio Martins, João F. Requicha and Maria J. Saavedra
Life 2023, 13(11), 2133; https://doi.org/10.3390/life13112133 - 29 Oct 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2514
Abstract
During a routine clinical examination of a four-year-old female Cuban boa (Epicrates angulifer) belonging to a zoological park located in northern Portugal, a skin lesion was observed. A skin swab was taken. Bacteriological analysis conducted using the Vitek® 2 Compact [...] Read more.
During a routine clinical examination of a four-year-old female Cuban boa (Epicrates angulifer) belonging to a zoological park located in northern Portugal, a skin lesion was observed. A skin swab was taken. Bacteriological analysis conducted using the Vitek® 2 Compact system identified the presence of the bacteria species Kocuria kristinae, a new bacterial pathogen that may be a potential pathogen in wild animals. This K. kristinae strain was resistant to kanamycin, pradofloxacin, erythromycin, clindamycin, tetracycline, nitrofurantoin, and trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole and was therefore classified as a multidrug-resistant bacterium. To the authors’ knowledge, this is the first time that K. kristinae has been described in the skin of a Cuban boa. This report serves as a cautionary warning about the importance of recognising and investigating the potential pathogenicity of this agent, as well as contributing to the development of strategies to prevent the spread of antibiotic-resistant microorganisms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Animal Science)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1308 KB  
Article
Time-Kill Analysis of Canine Skin Pathogens: A Comparison of Pradofloxacin and Marbofloxacin
by Stefano Azzariti, Andrew Mead, Pierre-Louis Toutain, Ross Bond and Ludovic Pelligand
Antibiotics 2023, 12(10), 1548; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics12101548 - 17 Oct 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3375
Abstract
Time-kill curves (TKCs) are more informative compared with the use of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) as they allow the capture of bacterial growth and the development of drug killing rates over time, which allows to compute key pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters. Our study aimed, [...] Read more.
Time-kill curves (TKCs) are more informative compared with the use of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) as they allow the capture of bacterial growth and the development of drug killing rates over time, which allows to compute key pharmacodynamic (PD) parameters. Our study aimed, using a semi-mechanistic mathematical model, to estimate the best pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) indices (ƒAUC/MIC or %ƒT > MIC) for the prediction of clinical efficacy of veterinary FQs in Staphylococcus pseudintermedius, Staphylococcus aureus, and Escherichia coli collected from canine pyoderma cases with a focus on the comparison between marbofloxacin and pradofloxacin. Eight TCKs for each bacterial species (4 susceptible and 4 resistant) were analysed in duplicate. The best PK/PD index was ƒAUC24h/MIC in both staphylococci and E. coli. For staphylococci, values of 25–40 h were necessary to achieve a bactericidal effect, whereas the calculated values (25–35 h) for E. coli were lower than those predicting a positive clinical outcome (100–120 h) in murine models. Pradofloxacin showed a higher potency (lower EC50) in comparison with marbofloxacin. However, no difference in terms of a maximal possible pharmacological killing rate (Emax) was observed. Taking into account in vivo exposure at the recommended dosage regimen (3 and 2 mg/kg for pradofloxacin and marbofloxacin, respectively), the overall killing rates (Kdrug) computed were also similar in most instances. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 647 KB  
Article
Investigation of In Vitro Susceptibility and Resistance Mechanisms in Skin Pathogens: Perspectives for Fluoroquinolone Therapy in Canine Pyoderma
by Stefano Azzariti, Ross Bond, Anette Loeffler, Flavia Zendri, Dorina Timofte, Yu-Mei Chang and Ludovic Pelligand
Antibiotics 2022, 11(9), 1204; https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics11091204 - 6 Sep 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3579
Abstract
Fluoroquinolones (FQ) are commonly used in dogs with bacterial skin infections. Their use as first choice, along with the increased incidence of FQ-resistance, represents a risk to animal and public health. Our study determined minimum inhibitory (MIC) and bactericidal (MBC) concentrations of five [...] Read more.
Fluoroquinolones (FQ) are commonly used in dogs with bacterial skin infections. Their use as first choice, along with the increased incidence of FQ-resistance, represents a risk to animal and public health. Our study determined minimum inhibitory (MIC) and bactericidal (MBC) concentrations of five FQs in Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus pseudintermedius, and Escherichia coli, together with FQ-resistance mechanisms. MICs, efflux pump (EP) overexpression and MBCs were measured in 249 skin infection isolates following CLSI guidelines (CLSI VET01-A4, CLSI M26-A). Chromosomal and plasmid-mediated resistance genes were investigated after DNA extraction and sequencing. FQ-resistance was detected in 10% of methicillin-susceptible (MS), 90% of methicillin-resistant (MR) staphylococci and in 36% of E. coli. Bactericidal effect was observed except in 50% of MRSA/P for ciprofloxacin and in 20% of MRSPs for enrofloxacin. Highest MICs were associated with double mutation in gyrA (Ser83Leu + Asp87Asn), efflux pumps and three PMQR genes in E. coli, and grlA (Ser80Phe + Glu84Lys) in S. aureus. EP overexpression was high among E. coli (96%), low in S. aureus (1%) and absent in S. pseudintermedius. Pradofloxacin and moxifloxacin showed low MICs with bactericidal effect. Since in vitro FQ resistance was associated with MR, FQ use should be prudently guided by susceptibility testing. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 7608 KB  
Article
In Vitro Killing of Canine Urinary Tract Infection Pathogens by Ampicillin, Cephalexin, Marbofloxacin, Pradofloxacin, and Trimethoprim/Sulfamethoxazole
by Joseph M. Blondeau and Shantelle D. Fitch
Microorganisms 2021, 9(11), 2279; https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9112279 - 2 Nov 2021
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 4151
Abstract
Urinary tract infections are common in dogs, necessitating antimicrobial therapy. We determined the speed and extent of in vitro killing of canine urinary tract infection pathogens by five antimicrobial agents (ampicillin, cephalexin, marbofloxacin, pradofloxacin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) following the first 3 h of drug [...] Read more.
Urinary tract infections are common in dogs, necessitating antimicrobial therapy. We determined the speed and extent of in vitro killing of canine urinary tract infection pathogens by five antimicrobial agents (ampicillin, cephalexin, marbofloxacin, pradofloxacin, and trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole) following the first 3 h of drug exposure. Minimum inhibitory and mutant prevention drug concentrations were determined for each strain. In vitro killing was determined by exposing bacteria to clinically relevant drug concentrations and recording the log10 reduction and percent kill in viable cells at timed intervals. Marbofloxacin and pradofloxacin killed more bacterial cells, and faster than other agents, depending on the time of sampling and drug concentration. Significant differences were seen between drugs for killing Escherichia coli, Proteus mirabilis, Enterococcus faecalis, and Staphylococcus pseudintermedius strains. At the maximum urine drug concentrations, significantly more E. coli cells were killed by marbofloxacin than by ampicillin (p < 0.0001), cephalexin (p < 0.0001), and TMP/SMX (p < 0.0001) and by pradofloxacin than by cephalexin (p < 0.0001) and TMP/SMX (p < 0.0001), following 5 min of drug exposure. Rapid killing of bacteria should inform thinking on drug selection for short course therapy for uncomplicated UTIs, without compromising patient care, and is consistent with appropriate antimicrobial use and stewardship principles. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Antimicrobial Agents and Resistance)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 2064 KB  
Article
Systemic Mycobacterium kansasii Infection in Two Related Cats
by Petra Černá, Jordan L. Mitchell, Joanna Lodzinska, Paola Cazzini, Katarina Varjonen and Danièlle A. Gunn-Moore
Pathogens 2020, 9(11), 959; https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens9110959 - 18 Nov 2020
Cited by 11 | Viewed by 7359
Abstract
Mycobacterial infections are a major concern in veterinary medicine because of the difficulty achieving an etiological diagnosis, the challenges and concerns of treatment, and the potential zoonotic risk. Mycobacterium kansasii, a slow-growing non-tuberculous mycobacteria, causes disease in both humans and animals. While [...] Read more.
Mycobacterial infections are a major concern in veterinary medicine because of the difficulty achieving an etiological diagnosis, the challenges and concerns of treatment, and the potential zoonotic risk. Mycobacterium kansasii, a slow-growing non-tuberculous mycobacteria, causes disease in both humans and animals. While infections have been well described in humans, where it may be misdiagnosed as tuberculosis, there are fewer reports in animals. Only four cases have been reported in the domestic cat. This case report describes systemic M. kansasii infection in two sibling indoor-only cats that presented two and half years apart with cutaneous disease that was found to be associated with osteolytic and pulmonary pathology. Infection with M. kansasii was confirmed in both cats by polymerase chain reaction on fine-needle aspirate of a lumbosacral soft tissue mass in one cat and on a tissue punch biopsy of a skin lesion in the other; interferon-gamma release assay inferred M. avium-complex and M. tuberculosis-complex infection in the two cats, respectively. Both patients made a full recovery following antimicrobial therapy with rifampicin, azithromycin, and pradofloxacin (plus N-acetyl cysteine in cat 2). This report highlights successful treatment of systemic M. kansasii mycobacteriosis in the cat and the challenge of accurately diagnosing this infection. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop