Search Results (11)

The growing reliance on AI-powered EdTech solutions has prompted educators at all levels to rethink teaching and learning methodologies. This shift has fostered a renewed partnership among teachers, students, and society, repositioning AI from a passive support tool into a proactive agent in the classroom. This transformation calls for teachers to exercise leadership and judgement in guiding students’ use of AI, emphasising both responsible practices and ethical considerations within their broader socio-cultural contexts. To harness this potential, we leveraged AI-based solutions within the AECT academic association to reinterpret UNESCO’s four foundational pillars of learning, thereby impacting the broader educational community. This initiative underscores literacy in educational communities emerging from intra-national and international inequity. Hence, it is imperative to examine the exigency of fundamental rights in relation to ethics and norms to uphold the innovative opportunities of AI in education globally. In this regard, this study connects the Pedagogical AI-Tact concept to bridge the gap between theory and practice, fostering both interest and ethical engagement across diverse educational communities. This study valuably upholds Margaret Mead’s proposal that every child deserves universal educational rights, a principle in harmony with justice and freedom. Full article

The rapid uptake of generative AI (e.g., ChatGPT, DALL·E and MS Copilot) is disrupting conventional notions of authenticity in assessment across higher education. The dominant response, surveillance and AI detection, misdiagnoses the problem. In an AI-mediated world, authenticity cannot be policed into existence; it must be redesigned. Situating AI within contemporary knowledge work shaped by digitisation, collaboration and evolving ethical expectations, we reconceptualise authenticity as something constructed in contexts where AI is expected, declared and scrutinised. The emphasis shifts from what students know to how they apply knowledge, make judgement, and justify choices with AI in the loop. We offer practical design for learning moves, i.e., discipline-agnostic learning design patterns that position AI as a collaborator rather than a cheating application: tasks that require students to critique, adapt and verify AI outputs, provide explicit process transparency (prompts, iterations, rationale) and exercise assessable demonstrations of digital discernment and ethical judgement. Examples include asking business students to interrogate a chatbot-generated market analysis and inviting pre-service teachers to evaluate AI-produced lesson plans for inclusivity and pedagogical soundness. Reflective artefacts such as metacognitive commentary, process logs, and oral defences make students’ thinking visible, substantiate attribute, and reduce reliance on punitive “gotcha” approaches. Our contribution is twofold: i. a conceptual account of authenticity fit for an AI-mediated world, and ii. a set of actionable, discipline-agnostic patterns that can be tailored to local contexts. The result is an integrity stance anchored in design rather than detection, enabling assessment that remains meaningful, ethical and intellectually demanding in the presence of AI, while advancing a broader shift toward assessment paradigms that reflect real-world professionalism. Full article

Higher education (HE) has become a central site where the relations between democracy, pedagogy and technology are being reshaped through algorithmic infrastructures. In this context, a specific tension becomes visible: as educational processes become intertwined with systems of classification, prediction and optimization, recognition risks becoming conditional on data legibility, while pedagogical judgement is redirected toward procedural efficiency. Against this background, this article investigates how subjectivity, recognition and pedagogical responsibility can be conceptually framed when formative encounters are mediated through pedagogical practice as well as through algorithmic operations. To address this question, it develops the DEA model (Democratic Education under Algorithmic Conditions) as a reflexive, education–theoretical heuristic grounded in educational theory, subjectivation research, democratic thought and critical data studies. The model positions education, democracy and digitalisation as interdependent fields and specifies three analytical dimensions: formative, normative and inferential. These are elaborated through relational vectors and framing structures that include societal discourses, institutional configurations, cultural imaginaries and biographical conditions. The reconstruction shows how pedagogical responsibility becomes vulnerable to displacement by optimization routines, how recognition is reorganised by regimes of data legibility and how didactic relations are reconfigured through automated feedback and recommendation systems. Rather than prescribing technical solutions, the DEA model offers a conceptual orientation for tracing how algorithmic mediation redistributes recognition, responsibility and legitimacy in HE, and for sustaining Bildung and democratic subject formation under digital conditions. Full article

Music education offers well-documented benefits for student learning; however, generalist teachers often report low confidence in integrating music into their lessons. This study applies Universal Design for Learning (UDL) principles to develop teaching resources that address teacher barriers to music integration. Using framework analysis, data collected from semi-structured interviews with ten trainee primary teachers in United Arab Emirates (UAE) British curriculum schools were mapped against UDL’s three core principles: engagement, representation, and action and expression. Despite recognising music’s holistic educational value in cognitive enhancement, memory retention, and student expression, participants reported significant barriers to integrating the subject into their lessons. These barriers included performance anxiety, a perceived lack of subject knowledge, and fear of student judgement. The barriers were most pronounced when faced with the prospect of teaching upper-primary students. Framework analysis revealed how these challenges align with the UDL’s core principles. These findings led to the development of five-step music resources, categorised into beginner and intermediate levels. Each step of the resources is designed to systematically address these identified barriers through UDL’s proactive and intentional design criteria. This demonstrates how teacher education can move beyond identifying barriers to creating structured solutions that support inclusive music integration while maintaining pedagogical authenticity. Full article

Higher Degree by Research (HDR) students in language and education disciplines, particularly those enrolled in thesis-only programmes, are increasingly expected to interpret complex statistical data. However, many lack the analytical skills required for independent statistical analysis, posing challenges to their research competence. This study investigated the pedagogical potential of ChatGPT-4o feedback and peer feedback in supporting students’ evaluative judgement during a 14-week doctoral-level statistical analysis course at a research-intensive university. Thirty-two doctoral students were assigned to receive either ChatGPT feedback or peer feedback on a mid-term assignment. They were then required to complete written reflections. Follow-up interviews with six selected participants revealed that each feedback modality influenced their evaluative judgement differently across three dimensions: hard (accuracy-based), soft (value-based), and dynamic (process-based). While ChatGPT provided timely and detailed guidance, it offered limited support for students’ confidence in verifying accuracy. Peer feedback promoted critical reflection and collaboration but varied in quality. We therefore argue that strategically combining ChatGPT feedback and peer feedback may better support novice researchers in developing statistical competence in hybrid human–AI learning environments. Full article

This study responds to the debate on understanding and evaluating teacher learning in professional development programmes, with particular reference to the development of equitable mathematics classrooms. Conducted in the context of a year-long PD mathematics programme for primary teachers in Norway, designed to disrupt teachers’ assumptions about mathematics pedagogy and how it relates to students’ mathematical thinking, this study takes teachers’ entry goals as its point of departure. Sixteen teachers participated in interviews at the end of the course. Recognising the situated nature of the development of pedagogic judgement in our analysis of teachers’ reflections on their learning, we report on the shift in their “problems of practice” towards actionable concerns about student inclusion. We argue that this shift underpins a fundamental change in their assumptions about teaching and learning and a critical stance towards their own professional practice, suggesting an important indicator of what constitutes sustainable professional development for critical mathematics education. Full article

Comenius is considered by many scholars to be the father of modern education, a title that he has thoroughly earned. His ideas about universal education for all children foreshadowed modern pedagogical developments, and he dedicated more than forty years of his life to reforming education and society. The question guiding this research was: Why was Comenius so dedicated to reform efforts, and why were his ideas about education so peculiar for his time? Through a review of existing scholarship and Comenius’ own writing, namely the Labyrinth, Didactic, and the Orbis Pictus, it became clear that Comenius was inspired by the millenarian ideology prevalent during the fifteenth through the seventeenth centuries in Europe as well as the effects that the turbulence of the seventeenth century had on his own life. These factors also led Comenius to believe that educational reform was the key to unlocking Pansophy, which would incite the Millennium, the golden age of peace and prosperity that would precede the second coming of Christ and the final judgement of God. Full article

Vaccination is an explicit topic of the United Nations’ 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The present article explores a new way of involving student teachers into the vaccination debate. To this aim, 273 students at a Swiss university for teacher education were invited to read a debate between a vaccination proponent and a vaccination opponent that had been published in a free local newspaper. Then, they were asked to judge five of the main arguments of each discussant and to take a (hypothetical) general decision in favor or against vaccination. This decision, the judgements, and students’ comments were investigated with a mixed method approach in order to better understand the students’ needs and to refine the new approach. It was found that the students eagerly took part in the intervention, but that they were very ambivalent concerning the arguments. They could be classified into three groups. Two groups, called the acceptors and the rejectors, supported the proponent and the opponent, respectively, and decided accordingly in favor or against vaccination. However, there remained a considerably large group that was called the hesitators. They were particularly ambivalent towards both types of argumentation, but, as structural equation modelling revealed, they eventually were more influenced by the arguments in favor than by those against vaccination. In their comments, these students wanted to know more about the prevented diseases, and they often referred to their personal experience but not to the experts’ arguments. It was concluded that this group would benefit most from the new type of intervention. A shared-decision approach, as is today prominently discussed in medicine, could improve its impact, and ways should be found to more seriously and consistently include empathetic understanding in pedagogical settings—for example, by adapting the three-step model from medicine or the reflective equilibrium approach from applied ethics. Full article

Comparison is an everyday process of thinking, which is also frequently used in geography lessons. However, in geography pedagogy, the term ‘comparison’ remains vague and insufficiently defined. In this paper, we will propose a clear definition of what comparison is and introduce it as a systematic method for secondary school geography education. This definition and method is the result of our theoretical–conceptual approach, according to which we have analyzed the current academic discussion about scientific comparison and converted it into a method for teaching. We argue that applying comparison as a pedagogical tool may improve students’ skills to argue, reflect, solve problems, and promote good judgement. Full article

This paper examines the context of evidence-informed practice (EIP) by inquiring into how educational practice is defined and organised, and how predominant understandings of educational practice are concomitant with preferences for particular forms of evidence. This leads to discussion of how certain educational research traditions speak (or are unable to speak) to these evidence requirements, and how this shapes the nature of EIP. While the rise of EIP can be understood as part of the increasing attention paid by governments to systemic ‘improvement’ in education systems, it can be argued that the lack of a coherent body of educational knowledge in many national traditions enables governments to exercise control not only of definitions of ‘what works’ in education but also over conceptualisations of educational practice. For some policy makers and practitioners, the much-remarked dislocation between ‘evidence’ and teaching practice in many national contexts can only be solved by a narrowing of what counts as knowledge alongside a more prescriptive control over what counts as acceptable educational judgement. However, such an alignment serves to exclude wider educational purposes and arguably instrumentalises pedagogical relations. Meanwhile, some continental European countries maintain traditions that may serve to mitigate such developments, although these traditions are not without challenge. Full article

A group of 22 Muslim educators participating in a residential Islamic Education summer school were invited to explore their individual preferences for thinking and feeling (the two functions of the Jungian judging process). They were then invited to work in three groups (seven clear thinking types, eight clear feeling types, and seven individuals less clear of their preference) to discuss Psalm 1. Clear differences emerged between the ways in which thinking types and feeling types handled the judgement metred out to the wicked in the Psalm. The feeling types were disturbed by the portrayal of God in Psalm 1 and sought ways to mitigate the stark message. The thinking types confronted the dangers to which this image of God could lead and sought pedagogic strategies for dealing with these dangers. Full article