Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (34)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = partial breast irradiation

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
23 pages, 6264 KiB  
Article
Prognostic Significance of Macrophage Phenotypes in Peri-Tumoral Normal Tissue of Early-Stage Breast Cancer
by Marcel Hirschmann, Sören Schnellhardt, Matthias Rübner, Sarah Segelhorst, Oliver Ott, Ramona Erber, Christoph Daniel, Maike Büttner-Herold, Paul Gass, Rainer Fietkau and Luitpold Distel
Cells 2025, 14(11), 828; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14110828 - 3 Jun 2025
Viewed by 649
Abstract
In recent years, tumor-infiltrating inflammatory cells within the tumor microenvironment have been extensively studied. However, much less is known about inflammatory cells in the normal tissue surrounding tumors. In this study, we assess the prognostic significance of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in relation to [...] Read more.
In recent years, tumor-infiltrating inflammatory cells within the tumor microenvironment have been extensively studied. However, much less is known about inflammatory cells in the normal tissue surrounding tumors. In this study, we assess the prognostic significance of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in relation to disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with early-stage breast cancer. Our cohorts included patients from the APBI and BBCC trials, with eligible tumors being small in size and showing no signs of metastasis. We analyzed eight distinct inflammatory cell types in the normal tissue surrounding tumors, with a particular focus on the various macrophage subsets. There were clear differences in the frequencies of the different inflammatory cells, with a higher abundance of cells being found in the intraepithelial compartment compared to the stromal compartment. Notably, we found that M2-type macrophages located in the stromal compartment of tumor distant normal tissue exhibited a positive prognostic impact, in contrast to the M2-type macrophages found within the tumor itself. In the normal tissue surrounding tumors, there are surprisingly clear prognostic predictions for DFS. Normal tissue surrounding breast cancer tumors is clearly influenced by the tumor and could also influence the tumor in terms of growth and metastasis. Tumor-influenced inflammatory cells in the surrounding normal tissue could prevent the immune system from acting against the tumor and promote tumor growth through inflammation. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomarkers in Breast Cancer)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

13 pages, 496 KiB  
Article
Long-Term Results of a Prospective Multicenter Trial of APBI with Photon IORT
by Laura García-Cabrera, Beatriz Pinar-Sedeño, María Auxiliadora Cabezón-Pons, Nieves Rodriguez-Ibarria, Alba Dominguez-Dominguez, Daniel Aguiar-Santana, Paula Martín-Barrientos, Irene Rey-López, Pedro C. Lara and Marta Lloret-Saez-Bravo
Cancers 2025, 17(11), 1762; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17111762 - 23 May 2025
Viewed by 492
Abstract
Purpose: The aim of the present study is to analyze, for the first time, the results of a large prospective academic multicenter trial of partial breast irradiation (PBI) with exclusive photon intraoperative radiation therapy (ph-IORT) in early breast cancer patients, focusing on ipsilateral [...] Read more.
Purpose: The aim of the present study is to analyze, for the first time, the results of a large prospective academic multicenter trial of partial breast irradiation (PBI) with exclusive photon intraoperative radiation therapy (ph-IORT) in early breast cancer patients, focusing on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. The secondary endpoints were (a) incidence of regional/distant recurrence, (b) survival, and (c) toxicity. Methods: From January 2013 to December 2022, patients with low-risk TARGIT-A criteria invasive breast cancer were included in a prospective academic multicenter study of exclusive PBI with ph-IORT during breast-conserving surgery, conducted in three university hospitals in Las Palmas (Hospital Universitario Insular, Hospital Universitario Materno-Infantil, and Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Dr. Negrín). Results: Three hundred and twelve patients were included in the study. The mean age at diagnosis was 62 years (46–88). All tumors were classified as luminal molecular profile. No patient received supplementary external beam radiotherapy. Four patients developed ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) at 19, 29, 43, and 62 months of follow-up. Seventeen patients died of intercurrent diseases, and there were only 2 breast cancer-related deaths at 68 and 95 months, respectively. With a median follow-up of 78 months (7–140), actuarial 5-year freedom from local relapse and cancer survival rates were 98.9% and 100%, respectively. No patient developed early or late grade-3 toxicity. Conclusions: Partial breast irradiation with ph-IORT is a feasible, safe, and useful treatment in early breast cancer patients after BCS. A longer follow-up is needed to confirm the present results. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 330 KiB  
Review
Partial Breast Irradiation for Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions—A Narrative Review
by Ayyaz Qadir, Nabita Singh, Anelyn Chui, Michael Chao, Sergio Uribe and Farshad Foroudi
Tomography 2025, 11(6), 59; https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography11060059 - 22 May 2025
Viewed by 834
Abstract
Advances in breast cancer treatment have shifted the focus from maximizing local control to balancing oncologic efficacy with treatment de-escalation and toxicity reduction. Whole-breast irradiation (WBI) following breast-conserving surgery remains the standard of care, but with up to 90% of recurrences occurring near [...] Read more.
Advances in breast cancer treatment have shifted the focus from maximizing local control to balancing oncologic efficacy with treatment de-escalation and toxicity reduction. Whole-breast irradiation (WBI) following breast-conserving surgery remains the standard of care, but with up to 90% of recurrences occurring near the tumor bed, partial breast irradiation (PBI) has emerged as a viable alternative. Large randomized controlled trials (such as IMPORT LOW, Florence, and GEC-ESTRO) have demonstrated comparable ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) rates between PBI and WBI, reinforcing its oncologic safety in well-selected patients. However, challenges remain in optimizing fractionation schedules, refining patient selection, and minimizing late toxicity. Recent innovations, including MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) and neoadjuvant PBI, offer improved tumor targeting, real-time plan adaptation, and enhanced normal tissue sparing. These advancements hold promise for further reducing radiation-related morbidity and improving cosmetic outcomes. As PBI progresses, integrating novel imaging modalities and hypofractionated regimens will be crucial to refining protocols. This review synthesizes the latest evidence on PBI techniques, clinical outcomes, and emerging technologies to guide future research and clinical decision-making in precision breast radiotherapy. Full article
20 pages, 1041 KiB  
Study Protocol
Partial Breast Reirradiation for Breast Cancer Recurrences After Repeat Breast-Conserving Surgery with Proton Beam Therapy: The Prospective BREAST Trial (NCT06954623)
by Eva Meixner, Semi Harrabi, Katharina Seidensaal, Beata Koczur, Thomas Tessonnier, Adriane Lentz-Hommertgen, Line Hoeltgen, Philipp Hoegen-Saßmannshausen, Fabian Weykamp, Jakob Liermann, Juliane Hörner-Rieber and Jürgen Debus
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(10), 3416; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14103416 - 13 May 2025
Viewed by 830
Abstract
(1) Background: The management of ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence depends on the extent of the tumor, and staging results, and mastectomy is currently the standard of care for previously irradiated patients. Studies are increasingly investigating suitable candidates for the repeated use of [...] Read more.
(1) Background: The management of ipsilateral breast cancer recurrence depends on the extent of the tumor, and staging results, and mastectomy is currently the standard of care for previously irradiated patients. Studies are increasingly investigating suitable candidates for the repeated use of breast-conserving approaches as an alternative to mastectomy. But this includes the crucial necessity for curative reirradiation (Re-RT). The therapeutic challenge in reirradiation involves finding a balance between tumor control and the risk of severe toxicity from cumulative radiation doses in previously irradiated organs. Re-RT options include the use of brachytherapy, intraoperative radiotherapy, or external beam RT with photons or electrons. The application of particle therapy using proton beam therapy represents an innovative radiotherapeutic technique for breast cancer patients that might offer advantageous physical properties, a superior dose reduction to adjacent organs-at-risk, and effective target volume coverage with lower integral doses to the patient’s whole body. In addition, this technique could potentially offer higher radiobiological effects and tumor responses. (2) Methods: The BREAST trial (NCT06954623) will be conducted as a prospective, single-arm, phase II study in 20 patients with histologically proven invasive breast cancer recurrences after repeat breast-conserving surgery and with an indication for local reirradiation. The patients will receive partial-breast re-RT with proton beam therapy in 15 once-daily fractions up to a total dose of 40.05 Gy(RBE), delivered with active raster scanning. The required time interval will be 1 year after previous RT to the ipsilateral breast. (3) Results: The following results will be reported: The primary endpoint is defined as the cumulative overall occurrence of (sub)acute skin toxicity of grade ≥ 3 within 6 months after the start of re-RT. Secondary outcome includes an analysis of the local, regional, and distant control, progression-free and overall survival, quality of life, and cosmesis. The explorative and translational objectives of this study include planning comparisons to other RT techniques and irradiation types, dosimetric evaluations, analyses of radiological imaging features, and translational assessments of cardiac toxicity biomarkers and tumor markers. (4) Conclusions: Overall, the aim of this study is to evaluate the potential of proton beam therapy for partial breast reirradiation and to establish the underlying data for a randomized trial. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Oncology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 3006 KiB  
Article
Au@109Pd Core–Shell Nanoparticles Conjugated to Panitumumab for the Combined β—Auger Electron Therapy of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer
by Nasrin Abbasi Gharibkandi, Agnieszka Majkowska-Pilip, Rafał Walczak, Mateusz Wierzbicki and Aleksander Bilewicz
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2024, 25(24), 13555; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms252413555 - 18 Dec 2024
Viewed by 984
Abstract
Apart from HER2-positive, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the second most highly invasive type of breast cancer. Although TNBC does not overexpress HER2 receptors, it has been observed that EGFR protein expression is present in this specific type of tumor, making it an [...] Read more.
Apart from HER2-positive, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the second most highly invasive type of breast cancer. Although TNBC does not overexpress HER2 receptors, it has been observed that EGFR protein expression is present in this specific type of tumor, making it an attractive target for immune and radiopharmaceutical treatments. In our current study, we used 109Pd (T1/2 = 13.7 h) in the form of a 109Pd/109mAg in vivo generator as a source of β particles and Auger electrons in targeted radionuclide therapy for TNBC. 109Pd, obtained through neutron irradiation of the 108Pd target, was deposited onto 15 nm gold nanoparticles to form Au@109Pd core–shell nanoparticles, which were then conjugated to the panitumumab antibody. Au@109Pd-PEG-panitumumab nanoparticles were bound, internalized, and partially routed to the nucleus in MDA-MB-231 human breast cancer cells overexpressing EGFR receptors. The Au@109Pd-panitumumab radioconjugate significantly reduced the metabolic activity of MDA-MB-231 cells in a dose-dependent manner. In conclusion, we have found that Au@109Pd-PEG-panitumumab nanoparticles show potential as a therapeutic agent for combined β–Auger electron targeted radionuclide therapy of TNBC. The simultaneous emission of β, conversion, and Auger electrons from the 109Pd/109mAg generator, similar to 161Tb conjugates, significantly enhances the therapeutic effect. The partial localization of these nanoparticles into the cell nucleus, provided by the panitumumab vector, ensures effective therapy with Auger electrons. This is particularly important for the treatment of drug-resistant TNBC cells. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advances in Nanomedicine Innovation in Cancer Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 3437 KiB  
Article
Tumor-Associated Neutrophils Are a Negative Prognostic Factor in Early Luminal Breast Cancers Lacking Immunosuppressive Macrophage Recruitment
by Eva Schmidt, Luitpold Distel, Ramona Erber, Maike Büttner-Herold, Marie-Charlotte Rosahl, Oliver J. Ott, Vratislav Strnad, Carolin C. Hack, Arndt Hartmann, Markus Hecht, Rainer Fietkau and Sören Schnellhardt
Cancers 2024, 16(18), 3160; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16183160 - 15 Sep 2024
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 1690
Abstract
Background: Tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) are important modulators of the tumor microenvironment with opposing functions that can promote and inhibit tumor progression. The prognostic role of TANs in early luminal breast cancer is unclear. Methods: A total of 144 patients were treated for early-stage [...] Read more.
Background: Tumor-associated neutrophils (TANs) are important modulators of the tumor microenvironment with opposing functions that can promote and inhibit tumor progression. The prognostic role of TANs in early luminal breast cancer is unclear. Methods: A total of 144 patients were treated for early-stage hormone-receptor-positive breast cancer as part of an Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI) phase II trial. Resection samples from multiple locations were processed into tissue microarrays and sections thereof immunohistochemically stained for CD66b+ neutrophils. CD66b+ neutrophil density was measured separately in the stromal and intraepithelial compartment. Results: High stromal and intraepithelial CD66b+ TAN density was a negative prognostic factor in central tumor samples. In addition, neutrophil density in adjacent normal breast tissue and lymph node samples also correlated with reduced disease-free survival. TAN density correlated with CD163+ M2-like tumor-associated macrophage (TAM) density, which we analyzed in a previous study. TANs were a negative prognostic factor in tumors with an elevated M1/M2 TAM ratio, while this impact on patient outcome was lost in tumors with a low M1/M2 ratio. A combined multivariate analysis of TAM and TAN density revealed that only TAM polarization status was an independent prognostic factor. Conclusions: CD66b+ neutrophils were a negative prognostic factor in early-stage luminal breast cancer in single-marker analysis. Combined analysis with TAMs could be necessary to correctly evaluate their prognostic impact in future studies. TAN recruitment might act as a compensatory mechanism of immunoevasion and disease progression in tumors that are unable to sufficiently attract and polarize TAMs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Research on Early-Stage Breast Cancer: Management and Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1499 KiB  
Review
Escalation and De-Escalation of Adjuvant Radiotherapy in Early Breast Cancer: Strategies for Risk-Adapted Optimization
by Guenther Gruber
Cancers 2024, 16(17), 2946; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16172946 - 23 Aug 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2699
Abstract
Postoperative radiotherapy (RT) is recommended after breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy (with risk factors). Consideration of pros and cons, including potential side effects, demands the optimization of adjuvant RT and a risk-adapted approach. There is clear de-escalation in fractionation—hypofractionation should be considered standard. For [...] Read more.
Postoperative radiotherapy (RT) is recommended after breast-conserving surgery and mastectomy (with risk factors). Consideration of pros and cons, including potential side effects, demands the optimization of adjuvant RT and a risk-adapted approach. There is clear de-escalation in fractionation—hypofractionation should be considered standard. For selected low-risk situations, PBI only or even the omission of RT might be appropriate. In contrast, tendencies toward escalating RT are obvious. Preoperative RT seems attractive for patients in whom breast reconstruction is planned or for defining the tumor location more precisely with the potential of giving ablative doses. Dose escalation by a (simultaneous integrated) boost or the combination with new compounds/systemic treatments may increase antitumor efficacy but also toxicity. Despite low evidence, RT for oligometastatic disease is becoming increasingly popular. The omission of axillary dissection in node-positive disease led to an escalation of regional RT. Studies are ongoing to test if any axillary treatment can be omitted and which oligometastatic patients do really benefit from RT. Besides technical improvements, the incorporation of molecular risk profiles and also the response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy have the potential to optimize the decision-making concerning if and how local and/or regional RT should be administered. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Research and Progress in the Treatment of Breast Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 801 KiB  
Article
Ten-Year Results of Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation with Interstitial Multicatheter Brachytherapy after Breast-Conserving Surgery for Low-Risk Early Breast Cancer
by Nieves G. Rodríguez-Ibarria, Beatriz Pinar, Laura García, Auxiliadora Cabezón, Dolores Rey-Baltar, Juan Ignacio Rodríguez-Melcón, Marta Lloret and Pedro C. Lara
Cancers 2024, 16(6), 1138; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16061138 - 13 Mar 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1584
Abstract
Patients with an early carcinoma of the breast are commonly treated by breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and postoperative radiotherapy. Partial-breast irradiation has gained acceptance in the last few years. Between December 2008 and December 2017, 182 low-risk breast cancer patients treated by BCS in [...] Read more.
Patients with an early carcinoma of the breast are commonly treated by breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and postoperative radiotherapy. Partial-breast irradiation has gained acceptance in the last few years. Between December 2008 and December 2017, 182 low-risk breast cancer patients treated by BCS in the four university hospitals of the province of Las Palmas and treated with APBI using interstitial multicatheter brachytherapy were included in this study. After a mean follow-up for survivors of 10 years, the treatment was shown to be safe, as no severe acute/late toxicity (grade ≥ 3) was observed. The 10-year IBTR was 1.7% (95%CI: 0.7–2.7%), and the cause-specific survival was 94.9% (95%CI: 93.2–96.6%). We suggest that multicatheter brachytherapy after BCS is safe and effective in early breast cancer patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Partial Breast Radiotherapy: Evidence and Challenges)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 3082 KiB  
Article
Introduction of an Ultraviolet C-Irradiated 4T1 Murine Breast Cancer Whole-Cell Vaccine Model
by Gábor J. Szebeni, Róbert Alföldi, Lajos I. Nagy, Patrícia Neuperger, Nikolett Gémes, József Á. Balog, László Tiszlavicz and László G. Puskás
Vaccines 2023, 11(7), 1254; https://doi.org/10.3390/vaccines11071254 - 18 Jul 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3792
Abstract
The advent of immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatments. However, the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors may entail severe side effects, with the risk of therapeutic resistance. The generation of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells or CAR-NK cells requires specialized molecular laboratories, is costly, [...] Read more.
The advent of immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatments. However, the application of immune checkpoint inhibitors may entail severe side effects, with the risk of therapeutic resistance. The generation of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cells or CAR-NK cells requires specialized molecular laboratories, is costly, and is difficult to adapt to the rapidly growing number of cancer patients. To provide a simpler but effective immune therapy, a whole-cell tumor vaccine protocol was established based on ultraviolet C (UCV)-irradiated 4T1 triple-negative breast cancer cells. The apoptosis of tumor cells after UVC irradiation was verified using resazurin and Annexin V/propidium iodide flow cytometric assays. Protective immunity was achieved in immunized BALB/c mice, showing partial remission. Adoptive transfer of splenocytes or plasma from the mice in remission showed a protective effect in the naive BALB/c mice that received a living 4T1 tumor cell injection. 4T1-specific IgG antibodies were recorded in the plasma of the mice following immunization with the whole-cell vaccine. Interleukin-2 (IL-2) and oligonucleotide 2006 (ODN2006) adjuvants were used for the transfer of splenocytes from C57BL/6 mice into cyclophosphamide-treated BALB/c mice, resulting in prolonged survival, reduced tumor growth, and remission in 33% of the cases, without the development of the graft-versus-host disease. Our approach offers a simple, cost-effective whole-cell vaccine protocol that can be administered to immunocompetent healthy organisms. The plasma or the adoptive transfer of HLA-matching immunized donor-derived leukocytes could be used as an immune cell therapy for cancer patients. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 644 KiB  
Article
External-Beam-Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation Reduces Organ-at-Risk Doses Compared to Whole-Breast Irradiation after Breast-Conserving Surgery
by Oliver J. Ott, Wilhelm Stillkrieg, Ulrike Lambrecht, Claudia Schweizer, Allison Lamrani, Tim-Oliver Sauer, Vratislav Strnad, Christoph Bert, Carolin C. Hack, Matthias W. Beckmann and Rainer Fietkau
Cancers 2023, 15(12), 3128; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15123128 - 9 Jun 2023
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2463
Abstract
In order to evaluate organ-at-risk (OAR) doses in external-beam-accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) compared to standard whole-breast irradiation (WBI) after breast-conserving surgery. Between 2011 and 2021, 170 patients with early breast cancer received APBI within a prospective institutional single-arm trial. The prescribed dose to [...] Read more.
In order to evaluate organ-at-risk (OAR) doses in external-beam-accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) compared to standard whole-breast irradiation (WBI) after breast-conserving surgery. Between 2011 and 2021, 170 patients with early breast cancer received APBI within a prospective institutional single-arm trial. The prescribed dose to the planning treatment volume was 38 Gy in 10 fractions on 10 consecutive working days. OAR doses for the contralateral breast, the ipsilateral, contralateral, and whole lung, the whole heart, left ventricle (LV), and the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD), and for the spinal cord and the skin were assessed and compared to a control group with real-world data from 116 patients who underwent WBI. The trial was registered at the German Clinical Trials Registry, DRKS-ID: DRKS00004417. Compared to WBI, APBI led to reduced OAR doses for the contralateral breast (0.4 ± 0.6 vs. 0.8 ± 0.9 Gy, p = 0.000), the ipsilateral (4.3 ± 1.4 vs. 9.2 ± 2.5 Gy, p = 0.000) and whole mean lung dose (2.5 ± 0.8 vs. 4.9 ± 1.5 Gy, p = 0.000), the mean heart dose (1.6 ± 1.6 vs. 1.7 ± 1.4 Gy, p = 0.007), the LV V23 (0.1 ± 0.4 vs. 1.4 ± 2.6%, p < 0.001), the mean LAD dose (2.5 ± 3.4 vs. 4.8 ± 5.5 Gy, p < 0.001), the maximum spinal cord dose (1.5 ± 1.1 vs. 4.5 ± 5.7 Gy, p = 0.016), and the maximum skin dose (39.6 ± 1.8 vs. 49.1 ± 5.8 Gy, p = 0.000). APBI should be recommended to suitable patients to minimize the risk of secondary tumor induction and the incidence of consecutive major cardiac events. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Precision Medicine in Breast Cancer Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1451 KiB  
Article
Single Ultra-High Dose Rate Proton Transmission Beam for Whole Breast FLASH-Irradiation: Quantification of FLASH-Dose and Relation with Beam Parameters
by Patricia van Marlen, Steven van de Water, Max Dahele, Berend J. Slotman and Wilko F. A. R. Verbakel
Cancers 2023, 15(9), 2579; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15092579 - 30 Apr 2023
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2392
Abstract
Healthy tissue-sparing effects of FLASH (≥40 Gy/s, ≥4–8 Gy/fraction) radiotherapy (RT) make it potentially useful for whole breast irradiation (WBI), since there is often a lot of normal tissue within the planning target volume (PTV). We investigated WBI plan quality and determined FLASH-dose [...] Read more.
Healthy tissue-sparing effects of FLASH (≥40 Gy/s, ≥4–8 Gy/fraction) radiotherapy (RT) make it potentially useful for whole breast irradiation (WBI), since there is often a lot of normal tissue within the planning target volume (PTV). We investigated WBI plan quality and determined FLASH-dose for various machine settings using ultra-high dose rate (UHDR) proton transmission beams (TBs). While five-fraction WBI is commonplace, a potential FLASH-effect might facilitate shorter treatments, so hypothetical 2- and 1-fraction schedules were also analyzed. Using one tangential 250 MeV TB delivering 5 × 5.7 Gy, 2 × 9.74 Gy or 1 × 14.32 Gy, we evaluated: (1) spots with equal monitor units (MUs) in a uniform square grid with variable spacing; (2) spot MUs optimized with a minimum MU-threshold; and (3) splitting the optimized TB into two sub-beams: one delivering spots above an MU-threshold, i.e., at UHDRs; the other delivering the remaining spots necessary to improve plan quality. Scenarios 1–3 were planned for a test case, and scenario 3 was also planned for three other patients. Dose rates were calculated using the pencil beam scanning dose rate and the sliding-window dose rate. Various machine parameters were considered: minimum spot irradiation time (minST): 2 ms/1 ms/0.5 ms; maximum nozzle current (maxN): 200 nA/400 nA/800 nA; two gantry-current (GC) techniques: energy-layer and spot-based. For the test case (PTV = 819 cc) we found: (1) a 7 mm grid achieved the best balance between plan quality and FLASH-dose for equal-MU spots; (2) near the target boundary, lower-MU spots are necessary for homogeneity but decrease FLASH-dose; (3) the non-split beam achieved >95% FLASH for favorable (not clinically available) machine parameters (SB GC, low minST, high maxN), but <5% for clinically available settings (EB GC, minST = 2 ms, maxN = 200 nA); and (4) splitting gave better plan quality and higher FLASH-dose (~50%) for available settings. The clinical cases achieved ~50% (PTV = 1047 cc) or >95% (PTV = 477/677 cc) FLASH after splitting. A single UHDR-TB for WBI can achieve acceptable plan quality. Current machine parameters limit FLASH-dose, which can be partially overcome using beam-splitting. WBI FLASH-RT is technically feasible. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Progress in Proton Radiotherapy of Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 298 KiB  
Article
Physicians’ Opinion on Intraoperative Radiotherapy as a Therapeutic De-Escalation Option in Older Women with Early Breast Cancer
by Agnès Tallet, Dominique Rey, Clémence Casanova, Delphine Lecourtois, Marie Bergeaud, Marc-Karim Bendiane and Julien Mancini
Curr. Oncol. 2023, 30(3), 2812-2824; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30030214 - 27 Feb 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2475
Abstract
Background: Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is a therapeutic de-escalation option in older women with low-risk early breast cancer (EBC). A qualitative study was implemented to describe EBC physicians’ points of view on IORT as a de-escalation option. Methods: Recorded face-to-face and telephone semi-structured interviews [...] Read more.
Background: Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is a therapeutic de-escalation option in older women with low-risk early breast cancer (EBC). A qualitative study was implemented to describe EBC physicians’ points of view on IORT as a de-escalation option. Methods: Recorded face-to-face and telephone semi-structured interviews were conducted among diverse physicians from seven French comprehensive cancer centers. Interview transcripts were grouped as corpus to construct a typology. Thematic analysis was performed. Results: Positions toward IORT were contrasted between the 16 participating physicians. Five fully supported IORT as a de-escalation option, four were not in favor, and seven had a more reserved or neutral opinion. Points of divergence concerned treatment efficacy, treatment duration, side effects and sequelae, psychological impact, compliance with adjuvant endocrine therapy, logistical constraints, financial cost, and availability of other techniques of partial breast irradiation. Physicians in favor of IORT emphasized direct benefits for the patient, and those against pointed the lack of specific guidelines, risk of lost opportunity in older women with long life expectancy, and challenges of shared decision making. Conclusions: Despite national policies to preserve cancer patients’ quality of life and increase their participation in medical decision making, therapeutic de-escalation using IORT is not consensual among physicians. Further efforts are needed to promote patient-centered care. Full article
10 pages, 3195 KiB  
Article
Linac-Based Ultrahypofractionated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI) in Low-Risk Breast Cancer: First Results of a Monoinstitutional Observational Analysis
by Roland Merten, Mirko Fischer, Gennadii Kopytsia, Jörn Wichmann, Tim Lange, Anne Caroline Knöchelmann, Jan-Niklas Becker, Rüdiger Klapdor, Jan Hinrichs and Michael Bremer
Cancers 2023, 15(4), 1138; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15041138 - 10 Feb 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2294
Abstract
Purpose: For adjuvant radiotherapy of low-risk breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery, there have been many trials of hypofractionation and partial breast irradiation (PBI) over the years, with proven mild long-term toxicity. The aim of this study was to introduce a short-course dose-adapted concept, [...] Read more.
Purpose: For adjuvant radiotherapy of low-risk breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery, there have been many trials of hypofractionation and partial breast irradiation (PBI) over the years, with proven mild long-term toxicity. The aim of this study was to introduce a short-course dose-adapted concept, proven in whole breast irradiation (WBI) for use in accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), while monitoring dosimetric data and toxicity. Methods: From April 2020 to March 2022, 61 patients with low-risk breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) were treated at a single institution with percutaneous APBI of 26 Gy in five fractions every other day after breast-conserving surgery. Dosimetric data for target volume and organs at risk were determined retrospectively. Acute toxicity was evaluated. Results: The target volume of radiotherapy comprised an average of 19% of the ipsilateral mamma. The burden on the heart and lungs was very low. The mean cardiac dose during irradiation of the left breast was only 0.6 Gy. Two out of three patients remained without any acute side effects. Conclusions: Linac-based APBI is an attractive treatment option for patients with low-risk breast cancer in whom neither WBI nor complete omission of radiotherapy appears to be an adequate alternative. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer: Recent Advances and Challenges)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 484 KiB  
Review
Different Re-Irradiation Techniques after Breast-Conserving Surgery for Recurrent or New Primary Breast Cancer
by Camille Hardy Abeloos, Juhi M. Purswani, Paulina Galavis, Allison McCarthy, Christine Hitchen, J. Isabelle Choi and Naamit K. Gerber
Curr. Oncol. 2023, 30(1), 1151-1163; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol30010088 - 13 Jan 2023
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 7968
Abstract
Breast re-irradiation (reRT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) using external beam radiation is an increasingly used salvage approach for women presenting with recurrent or new primary breast cancer. However, radiation technique, dose and fractionation as well as eligibility criteria differ between studies. There is [...] Read more.
Breast re-irradiation (reRT) after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) using external beam radiation is an increasingly used salvage approach for women presenting with recurrent or new primary breast cancer. However, radiation technique, dose and fractionation as well as eligibility criteria differ between studies. There is also limited data on efficacy and safety of external beam hypofractionation and accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) regimens. This paper reviews existing retrospective and prospective data for breast reRT after BCS, APBI reRT outcomes and delivery at our institution and the need for a randomized controlled trial using shorter courses of radiation to better define patient selection for different reRT fractionation regimens. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 1384 KiB  
Review
Special Techniques of Adjuvant Breast Carcinoma Radiotherapy
by Iveta Kolářová, Bohuslav Melichar, Jaroslav Vaňásek, Igor Sirák, Jiří Petera, Kateřina Horáčková, Denisa Pohanková, Zuzana Šinkorová, Oldřich Hošek and Milan Vošmik
Cancers 2023, 15(1), 298; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15010298 - 31 Dec 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2639
Abstract
Modern radiotherapy techniques are designed to permit reduced irradiation of healthy tissue, resulting in a diminished risk of adverse effects and shortened recovery times. Several randomized studies have demonstrated the benefits of increased dosage to the tumor bed area in combination with whole [...] Read more.
Modern radiotherapy techniques are designed to permit reduced irradiation of healthy tissue, resulting in a diminished risk of adverse effects and shortened recovery times. Several randomized studies have demonstrated the benefits of increased dosage to the tumor bed area in combination with whole breast irradiation (WBI). Conventional WBI treatment following breast-conserving procedures, which required 5–7 weeks of daily treatments, has been reduced to 3–4 weeks when using hyperfractionated regimens. The dosage administration improves local control, albeit with poorer cosmesis. The method of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) shortens the treatment period whilst reducing the irradiated volume. APBI can be delivered using intraoperative radiation, brachytherapy, or external beam radiotherapy. Currently available data support the use of external beam partial breast irradiation in selected patients. Modern radiotherapy techniques make it possible to achieve favorable cosmesis in most patients undergoing immediate breast reconstruction surgery, and studies confirm that current methods of external beam radiation allow an acceptable coverage of target volumes both in the reconstructed breast and in the regional lymphatic nodes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Collection Breast Cancer: From Pathophysiology to Prevention and Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop