Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (282)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = palliative surgery

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
9 pages, 417 KiB  
Article
Minimally Invasive Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass as Palliative Revascularization in High-Risk Patients
by Magdalena Rufa, Adrian Ursulescu, Samir Ahad, Ragi Nagib, Marc Albert, Rafael Ayala, Nora Göbel, Tunjay Shavahatli, Mihnea Ghinescu, Ulrich Franke and Bartosz Rylski
Clin. Pract. 2025, 15(8), 147; https://doi.org/10.3390/clinpract15080147 - 6 Aug 2025
Abstract
Background: In high-risk and frail patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MV CAD), guidelines indicated complete revascularization with or without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) bears a high morbidity and mortality risk. In cases where catheter interventions were deemed unsuitable and conventional [...] Read more.
Background: In high-risk and frail patients with multivessel coronary artery disease (MV CAD), guidelines indicated complete revascularization with or without the use of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) bears a high morbidity and mortality risk. In cases where catheter interventions were deemed unsuitable and conventional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) posed an unacceptable perioperative risk, patients were scheduled for minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) grafting or minimally invasive multivessel coronary artery bypass grafting (MICS-CABG). We called this approach “palliative revascularization.” This study assesses the safety and impact of palliative revascularization on clinical outcomes and overall survival. Methods: A consecutive series of 57 patients undergoing MIDCAB or MICS-CABG as a palliative surgery between 2008 and 2018 was included. The decision for palliative surgery was met in heart team after carefully assessing each case. The patients underwent single or double-vessel revascularization using the left internal thoracic artery and rarely radial artery/saphenous vein segments, both endoscopically harvested. Inpatient data could be completed for all 57 patients. The mean follow-up interval was 4.2 ± 3.7 years, with a follow-up rate of 91.2%. Results: Mean patient age was 79.7 ± 7.4 years. Overall, 46 patients (80.7%) were male, 26 (45.6%) had a history of atrial fibrillation and 25 (43.9%) of chronic kidney disease. In total, 13 patients exhibited a moderate EuroSCORE II, while 27 were classified as high risk, with a EuroSCORE II exceeding 5%. Additionally, 40 patients (70.2%) presented with three-vessel disease, 17 (29.8%) suffered an acute myocardial infarction within three weeks prior to surgery and 50.9% presented an impaired ejection fraction. There were 48 MIDCAB and nine MICS CABG with no conversions either to sternotomy or to CPB. Eight cases were planned as hybrid procedures and only 15 patients (26.3%) were completely revascularized. During the first 30 days, four patients (7%) died. A myocardial infarction occurred in only one case, no patient necessitated immediate reoperation. The one-, three- and five-year survival rates were 83%, 67% and 61%, respectively. Conclusions: MIDCAB and MICS CABG can be successfully conducted as less invasive palliative surgery in high-risk multimorbid patients with MV CAD. The early and mid-term results were better than predicted. A higher rate of hybrid procedures could improve long-term outcome in selected cases. Full article
18 pages, 914 KiB  
Review
Advances in Surgical Management of Malignant Gastric Outlet Obstruction
by Sang-Ho Jeong, Miyeong Park, Kyung Won Seo and Jae-Seok Min
Cancers 2025, 17(15), 2567; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17152567 - 4 Aug 2025
Viewed by 27
Abstract
Malignant gastric outlet obstruction (MGOO) is a serious complication arising from advanced gastric or pancreatic head cancer, significantly impairing patients’ quality of life by disrupting oral intake and inducing severe gastrointestinal symptoms. With benign causes such as peptic ulcer disease on the decline, [...] Read more.
Malignant gastric outlet obstruction (MGOO) is a serious complication arising from advanced gastric or pancreatic head cancer, significantly impairing patients’ quality of life by disrupting oral intake and inducing severe gastrointestinal symptoms. With benign causes such as peptic ulcer disease on the decline, malignancies now account for 50–80% of gastric outlet obstruction (GOO) cases globally. This review outlines the pathophysiology, evolving epidemiology, and treatment modalities for MGOO. Therapeutic approaches include conservative management, endoscopic stenting, surgical gastrojejunostomy (GJ), stomach partitioning gastrojejunostomy (SPGJ), and endoscopic ultrasound-guided gastroenterostomy (EUS-GE). While endoscopic stenting offers rapid symptom relief with minimal invasiveness, it has higher rates of re-obstruction. Surgical options like GJ and SPGJ provide more durable palliation, especially for patients with longer expected survival. SPGJ, a modified surgical technique, demonstrates reduced incidence of delayed gastric emptying and may improve postoperative oral intake and survival compared to conventional GJ. EUS-GE represents a promising, minimally invasive alternative that combines surgical durability with endoscopic efficiency, although long-term data remain limited. Treatment selection should consider patient performance status, tumor characteristics, prognosis, and institutional resources. This comprehensive review underscores the need for individualized, multidisciplinary decision-making to optimize symptom relief, nutritional status, and overall outcomes in patients with MGOO. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Treatment of Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 3179 KiB  
Review
Glioblastoma: A Multidisciplinary Approach to Its Pathophysiology, Treatment, and Innovative Therapeutic Strategies
by Felipe Esparza-Salazar, Renata Murguiondo-Pérez, Gabriela Cano-Herrera, Maria F. Bautista-Gonzalez, Ericka C. Loza-López, Amairani Méndez-Vionet, Ximena A. Van-Tienhoven, Alejandro Chumaceiro-Natera, Emmanuel Simental-Aldaba and Antonio Ibarra
Biomedicines 2025, 13(8), 1882; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13081882 - 2 Aug 2025
Viewed by 190
Abstract
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor, characterized by rapid progression, profound heterogeneity, and resistance to conventional therapies. This review provides an integrated overview of GBM’s pathophysiology, highlighting key mechanisms such as neuroinflammation, genetic alterations (e.g., EGFR, PDGFRA), the tumor microenvironment, [...] Read more.
Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor, characterized by rapid progression, profound heterogeneity, and resistance to conventional therapies. This review provides an integrated overview of GBM’s pathophysiology, highlighting key mechanisms such as neuroinflammation, genetic alterations (e.g., EGFR, PDGFRA), the tumor microenvironment, microbiome interactions, and molecular dysregulations involving gangliosides and sphingolipids. Current diagnostic strategies, including imaging, histopathology, immunohistochemistry, and emerging liquid biopsy techniques, are explored for their role in improving early detection and monitoring. Treatment remains challenging, with standard therapies—surgery, radiotherapy, and temozolomide—offering limited survival benefits. Innovative therapies are increasingly being explored and implemented, including immune checkpoint inhibitors, CAR-T cell therapy, dendritic and peptide vaccines, and oncolytic virotherapy. Advances in nanotechnology and personalized medicine, such as individualized multimodal immunotherapy and NanoTherm therapy, are also discussed as strategies to overcome the blood–brain barrier and tumor heterogeneity. Additionally, stem cell-based approaches show promise in targeted drug delivery and immune modulation. Non-conventional strategies such as ketogenic diets and palliative care are also evaluated for their adjunctive potential. While novel therapies hold promise, GBM’s complexity demands continued interdisciplinary research to improve prognosis, treatment response, and patient quality of life. This review underscores the urgent need for personalized, multimodal strategies in combating this devastating malignancy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 3877 KiB  
Review
The Palliation of Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer: Evolution from Surgery to Minimally Invasive Modalities
by Muaaz Masood, Shayan Irani, Mehran Fotoohi, Lauren Wancata, Rajesh Krishnamoorthi and Richard A. Kozarek
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(14), 4997; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14144997 - 15 Jul 2025
Viewed by 422
Abstract
Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive malignancy, with a current 5-year survival rate in the United States of approximately 13.3%. Although the current standard for resectable pancreatic cancer most commonly includes neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to a curative resection, surgery, in the majority of patients, [...] Read more.
Pancreatic cancer is an aggressive malignancy, with a current 5-year survival rate in the United States of approximately 13.3%. Although the current standard for resectable pancreatic cancer most commonly includes neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to a curative resection, surgery, in the majority of patients, has historically been palliative. The latter interventions include open or laparoscopic bypass of the bile duct or stomach in cases of obstructive jaundice or gastric outlet obstruction, respectively. Non-surgical interventional therapies started with percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD), both as a palliative maneuver in unresectable patients with obstructive jaundice and to improve liver function in patients whose surgery was delayed. Likewise, interventional radiologic techniques included the placement of plastic and ultimately self-expandable metal stents (SEMSs) through PTBD tracts in patients with unresectable cancer as well as percutaneous cholecystostomy in patients who developed cholecystitis in the context of malignant obstructive jaundice. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and stent placement (plastic/SEMS) were subsequently used both preoperatively and palliatively, and this was followed by, or undertaken in conjunction with, endoscopic gastro-duodenal SEMS placement for gastric outlet obstruction. Although endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) was initially used to cytologically diagnose and stage pancreatic cancer, early palliation included celiac block or ablation for intractable pain. However, it took the development of lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMSs) to facilitate a myriad of palliative procedures: cholecystoduodenal, choledochoduodenal, gastrohepatic, and gastroenteric anastomoses for cholecystitis, obstructive jaundice, and gastric outlet obstruction, respectively. In this review, we outline these procedures, which have variably supplanted surgery for the palliation of pancreatic cancer in this rapidly evolving field. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Pancreatic Cancer: Novel Strategies of Diagnosis and Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 2265 KiB  
Review
Lung Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT): Challenging Scenarios and New Frontiers
by Serena Badellino, Francesco Cuccia, Marco Galaverni, Marianna Miele, Matteo Sepulcri, Maria Alessia Zerella, Ruggero Spoto, Emanuele Alì, Emanuela Olmetto, Luca Boldrini, Antonio Pontoriero and Paolo Borghetti
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(14), 4871; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14144871 - 9 Jul 2025
Viewed by 652
Abstract
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a pivotal treatment modality for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), offering highly precise, high-dose radiation delivery. However, several clinical challenges remain, particularly in the treatment of central or ultracentral tumors, which are located near critical [...] Read more.
Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) has emerged as a pivotal treatment modality for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), offering highly precise, high-dose radiation delivery. However, several clinical challenges remain, particularly in the treatment of central or ultracentral tumors, which are located near critical structures such as the heart, bronchi, and great vessels. The introduction of MRI-guided SBRT has significantly improved targeting precision, allowing for better assessment of tumor motion and adjacent organ structures. Additionally, SBRT has demonstrated efficacy in multifocal NSCLC, providing an effective option for patients with multiple primary tumors. Recent advances also highlight the role of SBRT in locally advanced NSCLC, where it is increasingly used as a complementary approach to concurrent chemotherapy or in cases where surgery is not feasible. Moreover, the combination of SBRT with immunotherapy has shown promising potential, enhancing tumor control and immunological responses. Furthermore, SBRTs application in SCLC is gaining momentum as a palliative and potentially curative option for selected patients. This narrative review explores these evolving clinical scenarios, the technical innovations supporting SBRT, and the integration of immunotherapy, providing an in-depth look at the new frontiers of SBRT in lung cancer treatment. Despite the challenges, the ongoing development of personalized approaches and technological advancements continues to push the boundaries of SBRTs clinical utility in lung cancer. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 408 KiB  
Article
Overweight and Obesity in Adults with Congenital Heart Disease and Heart Failure: Real-World Evidence from the PATHFINDER-CHD Registry
by Robert D. Pittrow, Harald Kaemmerer, Annika Freiberger, Stefan Achenbach, Gert Bischoff, Oliver Dewald, Peter Ewert, Anna Engel, Sebastian Freilinger, Jürgen Hörer, Stefan Holdenrieder, Michael Huntgeburth, Ann-Sophie Kaemmerer-Suleiman, Leonard B. Pittrow, Renate Kaulitz, Frank Klawonn, Fritz Mellert, Nicole Nagdyman, Rhoia C. Neidenbach, Wolfgang Schmiedeberg, Benjamin A. Pittrow, Elsa Ury, Fabian von Scheidt, Frank Harig and Mathieu N. Suleimanadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(13), 4561; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14134561 - 27 Jun 2025
Viewed by 512
Abstract
Background: The PATHFINDER-CHD Registry is a prospective, multicenter, non-interventional registry across tertiary care centers in Germany. The aim is to analyze real-world data on adults with congenital heart defects (ACHD) or hereditary connective tissue disorders who have manifest heart failure (HF), a history [...] Read more.
Background: The PATHFINDER-CHD Registry is a prospective, multicenter, non-interventional registry across tertiary care centers in Germany. The aim is to analyze real-world data on adults with congenital heart defects (ACHD) or hereditary connective tissue disorders who have manifest heart failure (HF), a history of HF, or are at significant risk of developing HF. This analysis investigates the prevalence and clinical impact of overweight and obesity in this unique population. Methods: As of 1st February, 2025, a total of 1490 ACHD had been enrolled. The mean age was 39.4 ± 12.4 years, and 47.9% were female. Patients were categorized according to Perloff’s functional class and the Munich Heart Failure Classification for Congenital Heart Disease (MUC-HF-Class). Results: The most common congenital heart disease (CHD) in this cohort was Tetralogy of Fallot, transposition of the great arteries, and congenital aortic valve disease. Marfan syndrome was the most common hereditary connective tissue disease. Of the patients, 46.1% were classified as overweight (32.8%) or obese (13.3%), while 4.8% were underweight. The highest prevalence of overweight (47.1%) was observed among patients who had undergone palliative surgery, whereas untreated patients showed the highest proportion of normal weight (57.2%). Cyanotic patients were predominantly of normal weight. Patients with univentricular circulation exhibited significantly lower rates of overweight and obesity (35%; p = 0.001). Overweight and obesity were statistically significantly associated with arterial hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and sleep apnea (all p < 0.001). High BMI was linked to increased use of HF-specific medications, including SGLT2 inhibitors (p = 0.040), diuretics (p = 0.014), and angiotensin receptor blockers (p = 0.005). Conclusions: The data highlight the clinical relevance of overweight and obesity in ACHD with HF, emphasizing the need for individualized prevention and treatment strategies. The registry serves as a critical foundation for the optimization of long-term care in this population. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cardiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 733 KiB  
Article
Clinical Significance of Prognostic Nutritional Index in Patients Who Underwent Palliative Surgery for Spine Metastasis
by Young-Hoon Kim, Kee-Yong Ha, Hyung-Youl Park, Kihyun Kwon, Yunseong Kim, Hyun W. Bae and Sang-Il Kim
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(12), 4372; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124372 - 19 Jun 2025
Viewed by 366
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Malnutrition is common in patients with metastatic spine tumors (MSTs) and may adversely affect surgical outcomes. The Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) reflects both nutritional and immune status, but its role in palliative MST surgery is not well defined. The aim of [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Malnutrition is common in patients with metastatic spine tumors (MSTs) and may adversely affect surgical outcomes. The Prognostic Nutritional Index (PNI) reflects both nutritional and immune status, but its role in palliative MST surgery is not well defined. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between preoperative the PNI and postoperative outcomes, including functional recovery and survival, in patients undergoing palliative surgery for MSTs. Methods: A brief description of the main methods or treatments applied. This can include any relevant preregistration or specimen information. Results: Patients with a higher PNI (≥42.8) demonstrated significantly better postoperative ambulation and longer overall survival compared to those with a lower PNI (<42.8). The higher PNI group showed earlier ambulation (p = 0.017) and longer median survival (30.7 vs. 7.0 months; p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis confirmed that a PNI ≥ 42.8 was an independent predictor of early ambulation (HR = 1.516; 95% CI: 1.010–2.277; p = 0.045) and prolonged survival (HR = 0.955; 95% CI: 0.927–0.985; p = 0.003). No significant association was found between the PNI and postoperative infections. Conclusions: The PNI is a simple and effective predictor of postoperative functional recovery and survival in patients undergoing palliative surgery for MSTs. Its routine preoperative assessment may help stratify surgical risk, guide nutritional interventions, and optimize clinical outcomes in this vulnerable population. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Spine Tumor Diagnosis and Treatment)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 847 KiB  
Article
Predictive Factors Aiding in the Estimation of Intraoperative Resources in Gastric Cancer Oncologic Surgery
by Alexandru Blidișel, Mihai-Cătălin Roșu, Andreea-Adriana Neamțu, Bogdan Dan Totolici, Răzvan-Ovidiu Pop-Moldovan, Andrei Ardelean, Valentin-Cristian Iovin, Ionuț Flaviu Faur, Cristina Adriana Dehelean, Sorin Adalbert Dema and Carmen Neamțu
Cancers 2025, 17(12), 2038; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17122038 - 18 Jun 2025
Viewed by 349
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Operating rooms represent valuable and pivotal units of any hospital. Therefore, their management affects healthcare service delivery through rescheduling, staff shortage/overtime, cost inefficiency, and patient dissatisfaction, among others. To optimize scheduling, we aim to assess preoperative evaluation criteria that influence the prediction [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: Operating rooms represent valuable and pivotal units of any hospital. Therefore, their management affects healthcare service delivery through rescheduling, staff shortage/overtime, cost inefficiency, and patient dissatisfaction, among others. To optimize scheduling, we aim to assess preoperative evaluation criteria that influence the prediction of surgery duration for gastric cancer (GC) patients. In GC, radical surgery with curative intent is the ideal treatment. Nevertheless, the intervention sometimes must be palliative if the patient’s status and tumor staging prove too advanced. Methods: A 6-year retrospective cohort study was performed in a tertiary care hospital, including all cases diagnosed with GC (ICD-10 code C16), confirmed through histopathology, and undergoing surgical treatment (N = 108). Results: The results of our study confirm male predominance (63.89%) among GC surgery candidates while bringing new perspectives on patient evaluation criteria and choice of surgical intervention (curative—Group 1, palliative—Group 2). Surgery duration, including anesthesiology (175.19 [95% CI (157.60–192.77)] min), shows a direct correlation with the number of lymph nodes dissected (Surgical duration [min] = 10.67 × No. of lymph nodes removed − 32.25). Interestingly, the aggressiveness of the tumor based on histological grade (highly differentiated being generally less aggressive than poorly differentiated) shows differential correlation with surgery duration among curative and palliative surgery candidates. Similarly, TNM staging indicates the need for a longer surgical duration (pTNM stage IIA, IIB, and IIIA) for curative interventions in patients with less advanced stages, as opposed to shorter surgery duration for palliative interventions (pTNM stage IIIC and IV). Conclusions: The study quantitatively presents the resources needed for the optimal surgical treatment of different groups of GC patients, as the disease coding systems in use regard the treatment of each pathology as “standard” in terms of patient management. The results obtained are anchored in the global perspectives of surgical outcomes and aim to improve the management of operating room scheduling, staff, and resources. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue State-of-the-Art Research on Gastric Cancer Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 1584 KiB  
Review
Self-Expanding Metal Stents as an Alternative to Palliative Surgery in Advanced Obstructive Colorectal Cancer—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Vlad Rotaru, Elena Chitoran, Giuseppe Gullo, Daniela Viorica Mosoiu and Laurentiu Simion
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(12), 4339; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14124339 - 18 Jun 2025
Viewed by 488
Abstract
The diagnosis of colorectal cancer in more advanced stages, especially in younger patients where the diagnosis usually occurs because of obstructive complications, has prompted the development of less invasive, more rapid and well tolerated methods of decompression as an alternative to the standard [...] Read more.
The diagnosis of colorectal cancer in more advanced stages, especially in younger patients where the diagnosis usually occurs because of obstructive complications, has prompted the development of less invasive, more rapid and well tolerated methods of decompression as an alternative to the standard surgical approach. As such, self-expanding metal stents (SEMSs) have gained wide acceptance for the palliative alleviation of obstructive symptoms in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. The purpose of this study was to evaluate SEMS placement against various forms of palliative surgical procedures in terms of effectiveness, morbidity, mortality and oncologic results. We conducted a systematic search of PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Medline for articles describing patients with incurable locally advanced obstructive colorectal cancer who underwent surgery or self-expanding metal stent placement as a palliative procedure for the alleviation of symptoms. Eighteen studies (1606 patients) were included in a pooled meta-analysis. In the surgery group the clinical success was slightly higher (98.62% vs. 94.92%; OR = 0.35, 95%CI [0.16–0.73], p = 0.005) and the late complications rate was lower (13.9% vs. 24.0%; OR = 3.01, 95%CI [2.06–4.39], p < 0.00001). The SEMS placement was associated with a lower early complication (11.3% vs. 28.1%; OR = 0.34, 95%CI [0.19–0.58], p = 0.0001) and a shorter length of hospital stay (SMD = −1.94, 95%CI [−2.76, −1.12], p < 0.00001). In terms of the oncologic results, surgery was significantly associated with an increased overall survival regardless of the type of procedure (OR = 1.24, 95%CI [1.08–1.42], p = 0.002). Although having lower early morbidity and mortality rates, SEMS placement was associated with an increased chance of late complications and a worse overall survival, thus making them avoidable when patients have longer life expectancies. Due to the lower early complications rates, SEMSs might still have a place in the management of selected cases with bowel obstruction. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Management of Palliative Medicine)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 4535 KiB  
Article
Pressurized Intra-Peritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) for Peritoneal Malignancies with Palliative and Bidirectional Intent
by Daniele Marrelli, Ludovico Carbone, Daniele Fusario, Roberto Petrioli, Gianmario Edoardo Poto, Giulia Grassi, Riccardo Piagnerelli, Stefania Angela Piccioni, Carmelo Ricci, Maria Teresa Bianco, Maria Antonietta Mazzei, Stefano Lazzi and Franco Roviello
Cancers 2025, 17(12), 1938; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17121938 - 11 Jun 2025
Viewed by 739
Abstract
Background: PIPAC is an innovative treatment that delivers low-dose aerosolized chemotherapy into the abdominal cavity of patients with peritoneal surface malignancies (PSMs). However, its role in the multimodal management of PSMs is unclear. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 64 patients [...] Read more.
Background: PIPAC is an innovative treatment that delivers low-dose aerosolized chemotherapy into the abdominal cavity of patients with peritoneal surface malignancies (PSMs). However, its role in the multimodal management of PSMs is unclear. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data from 64 patients who underwent PIPAC for PSMs of a primary or secondary origin between June 2020 and December 2024 (median age of 64 years). Primary tumor sites included gastric (42.2%), colorectal (23.4%), ovarian cancer (21.9%), and others (12.5%). The median PCI was 15 (IQR 9–25), with ascites present in 60.9% of cases and a positive cytology in 48.4%. Results: A total of 82 PIPAC sessions were performed in 64 patients. The mean operation time was 96 min. Severe adverse events, defined as the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) of a grade ≥ 2, occurred in four patients (6.2%). The median hospital stay was 3 days, and systemic chemotherapy was resumed within 14 days after the procedure in 27 patients. Among the entire cohort, 37.5% received bidirectional therapy and 62.5% received palliative treatment, with a lower peritoneal cancer index (PCI) in the bidirectional group (9.5 vs. 23). The median overall survival (OS) was 32 months from diagnosis. Sixteen patients (25%) underwent two or more PIPAC sessions and showed an advantage in survival compared to patients who underwent only one procedure (3-year OS: 63.2% vs. 38.4%, p 0.030). Conversion surgery was achieved in 34.4%. Patients treated with a bidirectional intent demonstrated a longer OS (3-year: 66.0% vs. 33.9%, p 0.011). Colorectal and ovarian tumors exhibited better long-term outcomes compared to gastric cancer. Conclusions: PIPAC is a promising treatment for PSMs, with a low morbidity rate. Its favorable safety and short interval to systemic therapy resumption support its use as part of a bidirectional strategy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in the Management of Peritoneal Surface Malignancies)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 807 KiB  
Article
Overall Survival and Prognostic Factors in De Novo Metastatic Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (HER)-2-Positive Breast Cancer: A National Cancer Database Analysis
by Meghana Kesireddy, Durva Masih, Valerie K. Shostrom, Amulya Yellala, Samia Asif and Jairam Krishnamurthy
Cancers 2025, 17(11), 1823; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17111823 - 30 May 2025
Viewed by 869
Abstract
Background: About 15–20% of breast cancers are HER2 positive. Approximately 15–24% of individuals with localized HER2-positive cancer develop metastatic disease after curative treatment, while 3–10% present with de novo metastasis. Survival has significantly improved with various anti-HER2 agents, but there is considerable heterogeneity [...] Read more.
Background: About 15–20% of breast cancers are HER2 positive. Approximately 15–24% of individuals with localized HER2-positive cancer develop metastatic disease after curative treatment, while 3–10% present with de novo metastasis. Survival has significantly improved with various anti-HER2 agents, but there is considerable heterogeneity at the individual level. Our study aims to identify factors influencing survival in de novo metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer using a large sample from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Methods: Women with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer diagnosed from 2010 to 2020 in the NCDB were included. Demographic, clinicopathological, treatment data, and overall survival (OS) were collected. Kaplan–Meier curves estimated OS. The log-rank test identified OS differences between groups in univariate analysis. The Cox proportional hazard model with backward elimination identified factors affecting OS in multivariate analysis. The 12-month, 36-month, and 60-month survival estimates, 95% confidence intervals (CIs), and adjusted hazard ratios were reported. Results: Among 5376 women with metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer from 2010 to 2020, the median OS was 55.95 months (95% CI 53.55-NE). Multivariate analysis identified age, Charlson–Deyo comorbidity score, histology, HER2 IHC expression, hormone receptor status, the number of metastatic sites, metastasis location, first-line chemotherapy, anti-HER2 therapy, hormone-blocking therapy, surgery at primary/non-primary sites, and palliative treatment as significant factors affecting OS. Race and radiation receipt were not significant. Conclusions: This is the largest analysis of overall survival estimates in de novo metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer to date in the real-world setting. We identified several independent prognostic factors influencing OS in this population. These findings will help individualize prognostication at diagnosis, optimize treatment strategies, and facilitate patient stratification in future trials. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1672 KiB  
Article
Effect of Preoperative Single-Inhaler Triple Therapy on Pulmonary Function in Lung Cancer Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease and FEV1 < 1.5 L
by Takahiro Homma, Hisashi Saji, Yoshifumi Shimada, Keitaro Tanabe, Koji Kojima, Hideki Marushima, Tomoyuki Miyazawa, Hiroyuki Kimura, Hiroki Sakai, Kanji Otsubo, Takayuki Hatakeyama, Norifumi Kakizaki, Tomoshi Tsuchiya, Kei Morikawa and Masamichi Mineshita
Cancers 2025, 17(11), 1803; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17111803 - 28 May 2025
Viewed by 1251
Abstract
Background/objectives: This study aimed to investigate the impact of single-inhaler triple therapy on selecting treatment for lung cancer and the perioperative period in lung cancer patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and a forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) [...] Read more.
Background/objectives: This study aimed to investigate the impact of single-inhaler triple therapy on selecting treatment for lung cancer and the perioperative period in lung cancer patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and a forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) <1.5 L. Methods: All patients had baseline FEV1 < 1.5 L. The therapeutic drug for COPD, fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol, was initiated 2 weeks preoperatively and continued until 3 months postoperatively. Radical surgery was actively recommended for patients with an FEV1 ≥ 1.5 L after COPD treatment; otherwise, palliative surgery and postoperative complication risks were discussed. Results: Among 675 lung cancer patients, 214 (31.7%) had COPD, 41 of whom with FEV1 < 1.5 L were enrolled. After triple-inhaler therapy, FEV1 improved to ≥1.5 L in 63.4% of patients. Significant differences in the Brinkman index (840 vs. 1120, p = 0.0058) and radical resection (88.5% vs. 40.0%, p = 0.0030) were observed between patients with FEV1 ≥ 1.5 L and <1.5 L post-treatment. Pneumonia and home oxygen therapy occurred in two cases (4.9%) and one case (2.4%), respectively, all of which were patients with FEV1 < 1.5 L post-treatment. Among patients undergoing anatomical lung resection, triple-inhaler therapy significantly improved not only post-inhalation FEV1 (1.26 vs. 1.55 L, p < 0.0001), but also FEV1 at 3 months postoperatively compared to the value before inhalation (1.31 vs. 1.26 L, p = 0.042). Conclusions: Preoperative triple therapy in lung cancer patients with untreated COPD and FEV1 < 1.5 L improved respiratory function and increased the feasibility of performing radical resection surgery. Furthermore, it was considered safe and effective, indicating the potential to maintain preoperative respiratory function without increasing perioperative complications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 3428 KiB  
Article
Safety and Efficacy of Pressurized Intra-Thoracic Aerosol Chemotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Pleural Carcinomatosis: Preliminary Results of a Pilot Study
by Maria Giovanna Mastromarino, Vittorio Aprile, Gianmarco Elia, Diana Bacchin, Alessandra Lenzini, Stylianos Korasidis, Marcello Carlo Ambrogi, Silvia Martina Ferrari, Poupak Fallahi and Marco Lucchi
Methods Protoc. 2025, 8(3), 51; https://doi.org/10.3390/mps8030051 - 14 May 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 706
Abstract
Pleural carcinomatosis (PC) and malignant pleural effusion (MPE) affect up to 20% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and are usually synonymous with poor prognosis. Pressurized Intra-Thoracic Aerosol Chemotherapy (PITAC) is a novel and promising technique to control MPE in PC-NSCLC. [...] Read more.
Pleural carcinomatosis (PC) and malignant pleural effusion (MPE) affect up to 20% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and are usually synonymous with poor prognosis. Pressurized Intra-Thoracic Aerosol Chemotherapy (PITAC) is a novel and promising technique to control MPE in PC-NSCLC. This pilot study aimed to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of PITAC in terms of palliative pleurodesis and evaluate the local antineoplastic control by analyzing patient-derived primary cell cultures. From January to December 2023, seven patients underwent PITAC with tailored doses of cisplatin and doxorubicin. There were four males and three females, with a median age of 65 (IQR:19) years. No operating room contamination by aerosolized chemotherapeutics was observed. No intraoperative complications occurred, and 30-day mortality was nil. One patient developed a postoperative prolonged air leak. The median chest tube stay was 2 (IQR:2) days, and the median hospital stay was 4 (IQR:2) days. No systemic toxicity nor hypersensitivity to chemotherapeutics were observed. All patients developed effective pleurodesis in 30 days. Cell cultures obtained from biopsy of PC-NSCLC sampled before PITAC formed confluent and monolayer sheets of attached tumor cells, while after 30 min from PITAC, cultures exhibited a significant reduction in the cancer cells’ growth. Effective pleurodesis was observed three and six months after surgery in all patients. PITAC is a safe and effective technique to control MPE recurrence and might revolutionize loco-regional therapy for PC-NSCLC. Further research should assess its oncological role. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biomedical Sciences and Physiology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

31 pages, 1101 KiB  
Review
Particle Therapy to Overcome Cancer Radiation Resistance: “ARCHADE” Consortium Updates in Radiation Biology
by Samuel Valable, Mathieu Césaire, Kilian Lecrosnier, Antoine Gilbert, Mihaela Tudor, Guillaume Vares, Dounia Houria Hamdi, Ousseynou Ben Diouf, Thao Nguyen Pham, Julie Coupey, Juliette Thariat, Paul Lesueur, Elodie Anne Pérès, Juliette Aury-Landas, Zacharenia Nikitaki, Siamak Haghdoost, Carine Laurent, Jean-Christophe Poully, Jacques Balosso, Myriam Bernaudin, Diana I. Savu and François Chevalieradd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Cancers 2025, 17(9), 1580; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17091580 - 6 May 2025
Viewed by 978
Abstract
Radiation therapy is a medical treatment that uses high doses of radiation to kill or damage cancer cells. It works by damaging the DNA within the cancer cells, ultimately causing cell death. Radiotherapy can be used as a primary treatment, adjuvant treatment in [...] Read more.
Radiation therapy is a medical treatment that uses high doses of radiation to kill or damage cancer cells. It works by damaging the DNA within the cancer cells, ultimately causing cell death. Radiotherapy can be used as a primary treatment, adjuvant treatment in combination with surgery or chemotherapy or palliative treatment to relieve symptoms in advanced cancer stages. Radiation therapy is constantly improving in order to enhance the effect on cancer cells and reduce the side effects on healthy tissues. Our results clearly demonstrate that proton therapy and, even more, carbon ion therapy appear as promising alternatives to overcome the radioresistance of various tumors thanks to less dependency on oxygen and a better ability to kill cancer stem cells. Interestingly, hadrons also retain the advantages of radiosensitization approaches. These data confirm the great ability of hadrons to spare healthy tissue near the tumor via various mechanisms (reduced lymphopenia, bystander effect, etc.). Technology and machine improvements such as image-guided radiotherapy or particle therapies can improve treatment quality and efficacy (dose deposition and biological effect) in tumors while increasingly sparing healthy tissues. Radiation biology can help to understand how cancer cells resist radiation (hypoxia, DNA repair mechanisms, stem cell status, cell cycle position, etc.), how normal tissues may display sensitivity to radiation and how radiation effects can be increased with either radiosensitizers or accelerated particles. All these research topics are under investigation within the ARCHADE research community in France. By focusing on these areas, radiotherapy can become more effective, targeted and safe, enhancing the overall treatment experience and outcomes for cancer patients. Our goal is to provide biological evidence of the therapeutic advantages of hadrontherapy, according to the tumor characteristics. This article aims to give an updated view of our research in radiation biology within the frame of the French “ARCHADE association” and new perspectives on research and treatment with the C400 multi-ions accelerator prototype. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

20 pages, 2082 KiB  
Review
Malignant Bowel Occlusion: An Update on Current Available Treatments
by Benedetto Neri, Nicolò Citterio, Sara Concetta Schiavone, Dario Biasutto, Roberta Rea, Margareth Martino and Francesco Maria Di Matteo
Cancers 2025, 17(9), 1522; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers17091522 - 30 Apr 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1347
Abstract
Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is a critical complication occurring in patients with advanced malignancy. Current treatments are both surgical and non-surgical, the latter including medical, endoscopic, and percutaneous approaches. Surgery is still the treatment of choice for MBO. However, almost 50% of patients [...] Read more.
Malignant bowel obstruction (MBO) is a critical complication occurring in patients with advanced malignancy. Current treatments are both surgical and non-surgical, the latter including medical, endoscopic, and percutaneous approaches. Surgery is still the treatment of choice for MBO. However, almost 50% of patients are unfit for surgery because of poor performance status. Given the high post-operative mortality rate and the frailty of MBO patients, the least invasive surgical intervention is recommended. Therefore, recent multidisciplinary recommendations have suggested considering less invasive interventions instead of palliative surgery. Medical therapy, aiming to alleviate symptoms, is usually only a part of the therapeutic strategy when managing patients with MBO. Percutaneous techniques, including both interventional radiology and endoscopic procedures, are safe and effective for symptom relief, but often do not allow oral diet resumption. Endoscopic techniques are achieving a more relevant role for MBO treatment, as supported by the widening of the indication to colonic intraluminal stenting in the latest update of the European guidelines. Current data support the use of colonic stenting as both a bridge to surgery and the definitive treatment of malignant colonic obstruction. The development of endoscopic ultrasound-guided anastomotic techniques may offer the possibility of widening its applications to endoscopic treatment of MBO, allowing stenosis to be overcome, and reestablishing the continuity of the gastrointestinal tract in small bowel obstructions as well. The introduction of new interventional endoscopic techniques and their progressive diffusion will add the possibility to adopt minimally invasive solutions to treat a critical condition such as MBO. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Symptom Control and Palliative Care in Cancer)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop