Search Results (92)

Background/Objectives: Cochlear “injury” is thought to be a significant cause of tinnitus in patients with hearing loss. Interestingly, individuals with normal hearing may also experience tinnitus. This study evaluates otoacoustic distortion product emissions (DPOAEs) in individuals with normal hearing who experience tinnitus perception. Methods: In this prospective study, the tinnitus group (TG) consisted of 34 subjects with tinnitus (four unilaterally) and normal hearing (threshold ≤ 25 dBHL at 0.25–8 kHz). The control group (CG) comprised 10 healthy volunteers (20 ears) without tinnitus and normal hearing. Medical history was recorded, and all participants underwent a complete otolaryngological examination, pure tone audiometry, and DPOAE recording (DP-gram, L1 = 55 dB, L2 = 65 dB, for F2: 619–10,000 Hz). Moreover, participants in the TG completed a detailed tinnitus history (with self-rated loudness scoring) and the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (Greek-version THI-G) and underwent tinnitus analysis. Results: The recorded mean DPOAE values during the DP-gram of the CG were significantly larger in amplitude at low (t-test, Bonferroni-corrected p < 0.09) and high frequencies (t-test, Bonferroni-corrected p < 0.02) compared with the TG. Tinnitus assessment showed tinnitus pitch matching at the frequency area in the DP-gram, where the acceptance recording criteria were not met. There were no statistically significant differences in tinnitus onset, self-rated loudness scores of >70, and severe disability (THI-G > 58) for TG subjects in whom DPOAEs were not recorded at frequencies of ≤1000 Hz. Participants with abnormal DPOAEs at around 4000 Hz had tinnitus of sudden onset and severe disability (THI-G > 58). Finally, those with pathological recordings of DPOAEs at ≥6000 Hz had gradual onset tinnitus (Pearson Chi-square test, p < 0.05). Conclusions: DPOAEs in normal hearing individuals with tinnitus show lower amplitudes in low and high frequencies compared with normal hearing individuals without tinnitus. The tinnitus matched-frequency coincided with the frequency area where DPOAEs were abnormal. Full article

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the effects of vestibular stimulation (semicircular canals/utricles) compared to cochlear stimulation on phantom pain and depersonalization/derealization symptoms after ≥3 months since traumatic amputation of hand-finger(s). Methods: A total of 125 adults (38.2 ± 8.1 years old) with phantom pain after amputation of one to four fingers agreed to participate. None of them wore prosthetic devices or had history of otology/audiology/vestibular/neurology/rheumatology/orthopedic/psychiatry disorders or psychopharmacological treatment. After a preliminary assessment, in a random order, they were exposed to caloric stimulation (right/left 44 °C/30 °C), centrifuge (right/left), and transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TOAEs, right/left) with a follow-up of three days in between. Immediately before and after each stimulus, they reported on their pain characteristics and depersonalization/derealization symptoms. Results: After vestibular stimulation, a decrease in pain intensity was reported by at least one-third of the participants, which persisted for at least one day in the majority of them. Less than one-sixth of the participants reported pain decrease after cochlear stimulation. No influence was observed based on the side of the stimulation or the temperature, but the stimuli sequence had an effect. The centrifuge and TOAE effects were related to anxiety/depression symptoms and mainly observed when they were the first stimulus used. After caloric stimulation, pain decrease was independent from the sequence of the stimuli, and it was related to reports of feeling estrangement from the body. Conclusions: Mild caloric vestibular stimulation, whether applied to the right or left side and using warm or cold temperature, can modulate phantom pain after amputation of hand-finger(s) in patients with altered bodily sensations. However, individual cofactors may influence one’s susceptibility to experiencing this effect. Full article

Background/Objectives: Obesity is a risk factor for several diseases; however, less has been researched about how diet-induced obesity may affect the auditory system. In this sense, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of diet-induced obesity on the functionality and integrity of the outer hair cells, a key component of the organ of Corti, inside the cochlea. Furthermore, we hypothesized that adipose tissue (AT) status is associated with impaired outer hair cell auditory amplification in young C57BL/6 mice, contributing to increased vulnerability to hearing damage. Methods: Weaning male C57BL/6J mice (7 weeks old) weighing 22–23 g were divided into two diet groups: (i) a control diet or (ii) a high-fat diet (HFD) for 12 or 16 weeks. Metabolic parameters (body and AT weight, glucose tolerance test), AT dysfunction markers (AT remodeling, adipocyte size, crown-like structures), and outer hair cell function (distortion products otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) threshold and amplitudes) and integrity (hair cells cell count) were evaluated. Results: We observed that mice fed an HFD for 16 weeks showed a higher DPOAE threshold against stimuli at 16 KHz and a lower count of outer hair cells in the medial section of the cochlea. These results demonstrate a correlation between body and AT weight specifically at 16 weeks of treatment, the time point at which we observed a marked AT dysfunction. Conclusions: Taken together, our results suggest that obese mice with AT dysfunction have an altered auditory efferent system, characterized by a higher DPOAE threshold and a lower outer hair cell count in the medial section, which may impact signal transduction. Full article

Background/Objectives: Cochlear implantation is a crucial intervention for individuals with severe hearing loss, aiming to restore auditory function and improve quality of life. The decision to recommend cochlear implantation critically depends on accurate audiological evaluations. However, challenges arise when subjective assessments of hearing loss do not align with objective audiological measurements, leading to potential misdiagnoses. Comparisons are to be made between subjective and objective results, with an investigation into the characteristics, warning signs, and risk factors of functional hearing loss (FHL). Methods: A retrospective study of hearing loss presentations at an otorhinolaryngological university clinic between 2020 and 2024 was performed, whereby we collected FHL cases. The evaluation process included measurements of subjectively perceived hearing loss through pure-tone audiometry, speech understanding, and communication testing. The objective assessments comprised impedance measurement, otoacoustic emission measurement, auditory brainstem responses, auditory steady-state responses, and medical imaging. Results: During the studied period, 11 patients, with an average age of 35.2 years (13 to 64 years), who were originally referred for cochlear implantation evaluation and subsequently diagnosed with FHL, were identified. The majority (10 patients) were female. No organic cause was identified in four cases, while seven cases exhibited some organic ear abnormalities insufficient to justify the reported hearing loss. The degree of FHL ranged from 30 dB to 90 dB, with an average of 60 dB. Conclusions: Diagnosing FHL is challenging and requires comprehensive assessment and interdisciplinary collaboration. Failure to recognize it may lead to inappropriate treatment, including unnecessary cochlear implantation. This study advocates for the mandatory integration of ABR and ASSR in the clinical evaluation of all cochlear implant candidates to ensure accurate diagnosis and optimal treatment. Full article

Background: Occupational hearing loss (OHL) is a primary concern in industrial settings. In hospitals, the healthcare workers are also exposed to noise and chemical agents, the reported hearing loss in this occupation is underestimated. Hearing examination is routinely evaluated in the range of conventional frequencies, which may not detect hearing problems early. Therefore, this study aimed to reveal the hearing thresholds among medical personnel exposed to loud noise and/or chemical environments, estimating the prevalence of hearing loss using four different audiological methods. Methods: One hundred and thirty-one medical personnel were recruited from different units at the same hospital and grouped into noise, chemical, and mixed exposure categories. The hearing thresholds were assessed using four audiological methods, conventional audiometry (CA), extended high-frequency audiometry (EHFA), standard frequency distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE), and ultra-high-frequency DPOAE. Statistical analyses were performed using R. Results: Ultra-high-frequency DPOAE and EHFA showed a higher prevalence of hearing loss than CA and DPOAE. Even CA usually demonstrated hearing threshold within normal limits, this study found a notch audiogram pattern indicating a decline in hearing loss over time at frequencies of 2, 3, and 4 kHz in each age group and a sign at a frequency of 6 kHz. Conclusions: Evidence of hearing loss can be identified with ultra-high-frequency DPOAE and EHFA, despite conventional audiometry indicating normal hearing thresholds. Full article

Pesticide exposure poses a significant health risk, with emerging evidence suggesting its impact on auditory function. This study investigated the effects of pesticide exposure on hearing in young rural residents living near agricultural areas in Chile’s O’Higgins Region. We evaluated 51 participants (31 exposed, 20 unexposed) aged 18–35 years, using comprehensive audiological assessments including high-frequency audiometry, distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs), and auditory brainstem responses (ABR). Participants were classified based on residential proximity to agricultural areas, with exposed individuals living around 400 m or less from monoculture fields. Results revealed significant differences in high-frequency hearing thresholds (14 and 16 kHz) in exposed individuals. The exposed group showed a higher number of absent DPOAEs and reduced ABR wave V amplitude in the right ear compared to the unexposed group. Additionally, the wave V/I ratio was significantly lower in exposed individuals. These findings suggest that pesticide exposure, even without direct occupational contact, may induce measurable changes in auditory function, particularly affecting high-frequency hearing and neural responses. These results emphasize the need for enhanced monitoring and protective measures for populations residing near agricultural areas where pesticides are extensively used. Full article

Background/Objectives: The objective of this study is to determine whether the strong acoustic stimuli used in vestibular evoked myogenic potential (VEMP) testing contribute to distortion product otoacoustic emission (DPOAE) level reduction due to noise-induced hearing loss. Methods: The DPOAE levels were measured routinely to evaluate vestibular balance disorders with sensorineural hearing loss and to monitor changes in cochlear function before and after VEMP. The changes in DPOAE levels after VEMP testing in 174 patients (80 males and 94 females; median age, 53 years [interquartile range, 39–67 years; range, 15–85 years]) who were examined in the vertigo outpatient clinic between June 2021 and December 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Results: The DPOAE levels decreased significantly after VEMP testing at 1.4 kHz, 2 kHz, 2.8 kHz, sum all 1/2 octave, and average 1/2 octave (1–6 kHz). The decrease in DPOAE levels at 6 kHz exhibited a significant negative linear correlation with age (the coefficient of determination: 0.0189, p = 0.01), but not sex or side. Conclusions: The strong sound stimulation used in VEMP testing can decrease DPOAE levels. The frequencies at which DPOAE levels decreased significantly were overtones of the stimulus frequency, suggesting a possible effect of acoustic stimulation. VEMP testing can be an invasive test method and should be performed with detailed consideration of the risks and benefits. The age factor can influence the decrease in DPOAE levels in VEMP testing. Full article

Flight line personnel are constantly exposed to noise and jet fuel while working on flight lines. Studies suggest that jet fuel in combination with noise affects hearing loss more than noise exposure alone. This study examined the combined effects of jet fuel and noise exposure on the hearing of flight line personnel stationed at Japan Air Self-Defense Force Air Bases (Hamamatsu, Matsushima, Hyakuri, Yokota, and Iruma) and US Air Force Air Bases (Kadena and Misawa) in Japan. Samples were collected from all participants, 97 flightline-exposed and 71 control volunteers, to measure their individual noise levels with a personal sound level meter and volatile organic chemicals (VOCs) with a chemical sampling pump during a single shift. Blood samples were collected post shift. Urine samples (entire void) were collected prior to the shift (morning first void) and post shift. VOCs were measured in air, blood, and urine. An audiometric test battery, consisting of immittance measurements, audiograms, distortion product otoacoustic emissions, and the auditory brain response, was conducted after the shift to examine the hearing of participants. Total VOCs in personal air samples were in the ppb range for each group. Tinnitus and temporary hearing loss were reported in audiological histories but were also present in some controls. Noise levels on the flight line were greater than the action level for requiring hearing protection and exceeded exposure limits, but all exposed subjects reported wearing hearing protection. Audiometric tests identified significant differences and trends between flight line and control personnel, indicating the potential for hearing disorders. In spite of very low levels of VOC exposure and wearing hearing protection for noise, there is still the potential for hearing issues in flight line personnel. Full article

Background: The reported data on African universal neonatal hearing screening (UNHS) practices tend to be quite scarce, despite the developments in hearing screening the last two decades. The objective of this systematic review was (a) to identify the most recent (in a 20-year span) literature information about NHS/UNHS programs in Africa and (b) to provide data on the procedures used to assess the population, the intervention policies, and on the estimated prevalence of congenital hearing loss with an emphasis on bilateral hearing loss cases. Methods: Queries were conducted via the PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases for the time window of 2004–2024. The mesh terms used were “OAE”, “universal neonatal hearing screening”, “congenital hearing loss”, “well babies”, and “Africa”. Only research articles and review papers were considered as good candidates. The standard English language filter was not used, to identify information from non-English-speaking scientific communities and groups. Results: Data from 15 papers were considered, reflecting the neonatal hearing practices of nine African states. No country-wide NHS programs were reported. The various screening realities are implemented within big urban centers, leaving the residents of rural areas unassisted. For the latter, proposals based on tele-medicine protocols have been suggested. The data on HL prevalence are also incomplete, but the available data refer to rates from 3 to 360 subjects per 1000. These data cannot be taken at face value but within the small sample size context in which they were acquired. Regarding the causes of HL, very few data have been reported; consanguinity is the most attributed factor, at least in the Sub-Saharan African states. For the majority of the programs, no data were reported on hearing loss prevalence/incidence or on any strategies to restore hearing. Conclusions: The information on the African neonatal hearing screening are quite scarce, and it is an urgent need to convince audiologists from the African localized programs to publish their hearing screening data. Full article

Introduction: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), a new member of the coronavirus family. While respiratory transmission is the main route, concerns have arisen regarding possible vertical transmission, which refers to the transmission of the virus from mother to fetus through the dissemination of viral particles in the amniotic fluid. Fetal viral infection via the placenta can affect the formation of the auditory system and lead to congenital hearing disorders. The aim of this research was to investigate the effects of vertical exposure to COVID-19 on the auditory system of newborns. Methodology: The study included a study group (SG) and a control group (CG). Selected during neonatal hearing screening, the SG consisted of 23 infants up to 1 year old whose mothers had been infected with SARS-CoV-2. The CG consisted of 15 infants whose mothers became pregnant after the end of the pandemic, had tested negative for COVID-19, and had no respiratory symptoms during pregnancy. The assessments for both groups were brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs), tympanometry, transient evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs), and distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs). The research was divided into two studies, one cross-sectional and the other longitudinal. Results: All participants exhibited absolute latencies within the normal range for waves I, III, and V, although in the SG, there was a statistically significant increase in the latency of wave I in the left ear. In terms of OAEs, in the SG, there appeared to be a tendency for TEOAEs to be absent at high frequencies. Over several months, there was a general decrease in the amplitude of high-frequency responses in both TEOAEs and DPOAEs. Conclusion: No evidence was found that vertical exposure to COVID-19 causes hearing loss, although there were signs of possible deterioration in hair cell functioning. Full article

Neonatal hearing screening (NHS) is a critical public health measure for early identification of hearing loss, ensuring timely access to interventions that can dramatically improve a child’s language development, cognitive abilities, and social inclusion. Beyond clinical benefits, NHS provides long-term advantages in education and quality of life. Given that congenital hearing loss affects approximately 1–2 in every 1000 newborns worldwide, the case for universal screening is clear. Countries like the United States and Australia have successfully implemented NHS, leading to earlier diagnoses, improved language development, and better educational outcomes. In Europe, while many nations have adopted NHS, consistency remains a challenge. Countries such as Norway and the United Kingdom stand out for their well-established systems, whereas others, like Greece, have made notable progress but have yet to mandate NHS nationwide. This highlights the need for cohesive national policies across Europe to ensure universal coverage. Screening methods such as Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (TEOAE) and Automated Auditory Brainstem Response (AABR) are established tools for detecting hearing impairments in neonates. Despite their demonstrated efficacy, NHS remains inconsistent globally, particularly in low- and middle-income regions that lack mandatory policies or access to reliable screening technologies. This perspective advocates for the urgent need to make NHS mandatory in all countries, emphasizing its societal benefits and cost-effectiveness. Early diagnosis supports prompt intervention, like hearing aids or cochlear implants, which are most effective when implemented before six months. It also empowers families to make informed decisions, fosters educational inclusion, and mitigates the social and emotional challenges of undiagnosed hearing loss. Policymakers, healthcare providers, and international organizations must prioritize universal NHS to ensure no child is left behind due to unaddressed hearing loss. Full article

COVID-19 is an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus. During and after COVID-19, audiovestibular symptoms and impairments have been reported. Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the impacts of COVID-19 on the peripheral and central auditory systems of children and adolescents following the acute COVID-19 phase based on behavioral, electroacoustic, and electrophysiological audiological assessments. Methods: This is a primary, prospective, observational, and cross-sectional study of 23 children aged 8 to 15 years who acquired confirmed COVID-19 and who, before infection, had not had any auditory complaints or school complications. The results were compared with pre-pandemic data collected from a similar group of 23 children who had normal peripheral and central hearing and good school performance. Each participant answered a questionnaire about child development, school, and health history and underwent tests including pure-tone audiometry and high-frequency audiometry, imitanciometry, transient evoked otoacoustic emissions, and distortion product otoacoustic emissions. They also received tests of Brainstem Auditory Evoked Potentials, Long Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials, Dichotic Digits Test, Sentence Identification Test, Dichotic Consonant–Vowel Test, Frequency Pattern Test, and Gaps-In-Noise Test. Results: Significant differences were observed between the groups, with the study group showing worse thresholds compared to the control group at both standard audiometric frequencies and at higher frequencies, although both groups were still within normal limits (p ≤ 0.05). In addition, the study group had a higher prevalence of absent responses, as identified by otoacoustic emissions and acoustic reflexes. In terms of central auditory performance, the study group showed ABRs with significantly longer latencies of waves I, III, and V compared to the control group. The study group also performed less well on the Dichotic Digits and Pediatric Speech Identification tests. Conclusions: COVID-19 appears to alter the auditory system, both peripherally at the level of the outer hair cells and more centrally. Full article

Background/Objectives: The respiratory system is prone to infectious diseases, especially in children below five years of age. Upper respiratory tract infections in children are often associated with Eustachian tube dysfunction and complicated by otitis media with effusion (OME), an inflammatory process within the middle ear, which can lead to hearing loss. Treatment for these infections involves a combination of medication and symptom relief, depending on the severity and cause of the infection. In recent years, natural therapeutic drugs derived from herbal medicines have been gaining popularity in treating various pathologies. Bromelain, one of the most studied natural compounds, has been investigated extensively due to its numerous pharmacological properties, offering a potential new avenue for treatment. Based on these promising findings, our study was designed to examine the efficacy of supplementation with bromelain in countering symptoms associated with OME. Methods: This study was conducted on data acquired from medical records from the Section of Audiology of the University of Palermo, focusing on the period of January 2022 to June 2023 and selecting 224 children (age range 1–8 years), namely 174 males and 50 females, who were evaluated for presumed OME at the audiology pediatric ambulatory. All patients selected before initiating pharmacological treatment underwent thorough screening regarding the functionality of the tympanic cavities, otoacoustic emissions, the auditory threshold, and the ear canal’s integrity. Results: The preliminary findings of this study are significant, demonstrating that supplementation with bromelain led to notable improvements in the symptoms accompanying OME after 15 days and 60 days of therapy. Notably, patients who received the bromelain supplement reported reduced mucus secretions and improved auditory function. Conclusions: These results underscore the potential of naturally occurring compounds as adjuvants to standard therapeutic strategies in treating OME. Full article

Auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) is often missed by standard hearing tests, accounting for up to 10% of hearing impairments (HI) and commonly linked to variants in 23 genes. We assessed 122 children with HI, including 102 with sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and 20 with ANSD. SNHL patients were genotyped for common GJB2 variants using qPCR, while ANSD patients underwent whole exome sequencing, with variants analyzed across 249 genes. Homozygous GJB2 variants were found in 54.9% of SNHL patients. In 60% of ANSD patients, variants were detected in OTOF (25%), CDH23, TMC1, COL11A1, PRPS1, TWNK, and HOMER2 genes, including eight novel variants. Transient evoked otoacoustic emissions testing revealed differences at 4000 Hz (p = 0.0084) between the ANSD and SNHL groups. The auditory steady-state response (ASSR) test showed significant differences at 500 Hz (p = 2.69 × 10⁻⁴) and 1000 Hz (p = 0.0255) compared to pure-tone audiometry (PTA) in ANSD patients. Our questionnaire shows that the parents of children with SNHL often report an improved quality of life with hearing aids or cochlear implants, while parents of children with ANSD frequently experience uncertainty about outcomes (p = 0.0026), leading to lower satisfaction. Full article

Background: The objective was to analyze wideband acoustic absorbance and transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAEs) from newborns without risk indicators of hearing loss and test the effectiveness of measuring TEOAEs under pressurized ear canal conditions. Methods: Evaluation of 102 newborns from a maternity hospital, who stayed in the well-baby nursery and did not have risk indicators for hearing loss. The procedures involved wideband tympanometry and TEOAEs performed at ambient pressure (AP) and at a pressure corresponding to maximum compliance (PP). Newborns were then divided into three groups according to their AP and PP results: G1 (PASS/PASS), G2 (FAIL/PASS), and G3 (FAIL/FAIL). Results: Comparing the three groups, pressurization improved the pass rate for G2 only. For wideband absorbance, differences were statistically significant for frequencies of 2, 3, and 6 kHz, with lower values under the AP condition. For TEOAEs, the differences were statistically significant in all bands, with lower values under the AP condition. Conclusions: Pressurization was effective in detecting more TEOAEs in G2, thus reducing the number of failures in neonatal hearing screening and reducing the need to return for retesting. Full article