Search Results (46)

Background/Objectives: The gold standard of treatment for both melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancers is wide surgical resection to obtain oncological radicality, which occasionally results in functional or aesthetic impairment, potentially affecting quality of life. Despite the increased complexity of the technique, extended duration of hospitalization, and prolonged surgical operative times, microsurgery can facilitate the reconstruction of locally invasive skin cancers following ablative surgery and may yield superior functional and aesthetic outcomes. Consequently, microsurgical reconstruction is more likely to be necessary if a large skin tumor requires excision. However, the impact of this extensive and complex procedure on patients with skin cancer has not yet been fully elucidated. The objective of this research was to critically analyze the utilization of free flap reconstruction subsequent to skin cancer therapy. Through a comprehensive examination of published data, this study aimed to assess the potential benefits and drawbacks associated with this reconstructive approach. Methods: A systematic review of studies that were published from January 2004 to May 2024 was conducted using the MEDLINE online database search. To present an evidence summary and provide a systematic approach and quality assessment, the GRADE^® rating was applied to the results. Results: This review summarizes the oncological and clinical data, including previous interventions, adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies, nodal status, distant metastasis, and follow-up time. Surgical outcome parameters such as healing time, flap survival, revision rate success, and minor and major complications were documented. Along with the findings, a quality assessment of the studies was also provided. Conclusions: This systematic review underscores the extensive use and efficacy of microsurgery for reconstruction after skin cancer excision; however, the literature remains limited by inconsistent reporting of oncological outcomes and the lack of a standardized approach to evaluate the impact of free flap reconstruction on both immediate and long-term cancer-specific results. Full article

Background/Objectives: The aim of this case series is to evaluate the outcomes and safety of video-assisted mastectomy, illustrating the harmonious collaboration of oncologic and plastic surgery. This novel minimally invasive technique allows immediate prosthetic reconstruction and represents a cost-effective alternative to robotic breast surgery. Methods: Video-assisted, single-port nipple-sparing mastectomies were performed in patients with small to medium-sized breasts, followed by immediate direct-to-implant reconstruction with either prepectoral or dual plane implant placement. The patients’ electronic medical records were analyzed, including demographic characteristics, operative times and histopathology reports. Results: A total of 18 patients underwent successful video-assisted mastectomy, without conversion to traditional open procedure. Fifteen of the operations were risk-reducing mastectomies. Twelve patients had complementary procedures performed concurrently on the previously operated contralateral breast (delayed reconstruction/expander-to-implant exchange). Moreover, three patients benefited from additional minimally invasive techniques during the same surgery (prophylactic laparoscopic hysterectomy). Immediate breast reconstruction with polyurethane or microtextured breast implants up to 450 cc was performed, with satisfactory aesthetic outcomes and no cancer recurrences at 6 to 12 months postoperative follow-up. Early complications included transient hypercapnia, areolar congestion and cellulitis. No skin necrosis or implant-related complications were reported. The most frequently encountered late issues were contour irregularities. Conclusions: Video-assisted mastectomy facilitates the safe removal of proven pathologic or healthy breast tissue with minimal damage to the breast’s skin envelope, facilitating single-stage breast reconstruction. Full article

Oncoplastic breast-conserving surgery (OBCS), or oncoplastic surgery, has revolutionized the surgical management of breast cancer by integrating oncologic principles with reconstructive techniques to optimize both cancer control and aesthetic outcomes following breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Since its inception in the 1980s, the field has evolved significantly, incorporating a range of volume displacement and volume replacement strategies to restore breast contour after partial mastectomy. This review explores the current practices and key surgical considerations of OBCS. It highlights the role of preoperative multidisciplinary planning, patient selection, anatomical and vascular knowledge, and intraoperative technique in optimizing results. Barriers to access—including disparities in training, insurance, and geographic availability—are addressed, alongside efforts by professional societies like the American Society of Breast Surgeons (ASBS) to standardize definitions and practices. The review also outlines strategies for minimizing complications and enhancing oncologic, reconstructive, and patient-reported outcomes. By offering a comprehensive framework for clinical decision-making, this paper aims to support broader adoption and refinement of OBCS as a standard component of breast cancer care. Full article

This narrative review examines the efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and aesthetic outcomes of Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS) compared to standard excision for treating non-melanoma skin cancers (NMSCs). A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library, covering studies published from 2000 to 2024. Key terms such as “Mohs Micrographic Surgery,” “non-melanoma skin cancer,” “recurrence rates,” “cost-effectiveness,” and “aesthetic outcomes” were utilized. Inclusion criteria encompassed peer-reviewed articles, clinical trials, and observational studies focusing on MMS and standard excision outcomes. Exclusion criteria included studies with inadequate data or those not published in English. The review highlights the superior oncologic outcomes of MMS, its cost-effectiveness over the long term, and comparable aesthetic results to standard excision principally. Methods: This narrative review was conducted following established guidelines for reporting narrative reviews. A systematic search strategy was employed across selected databases, with the last search conducted in May 2025. The search terms used were “Mohs Micrographic Surgery,” “non-melanoma skin cancer,” “recurrence rates,” “cost-effectiveness,” and “aesthetic outcomes.” Studies included were published between 2000 and 2024, in English, and provided data on the specified outcomes. Results: The majority of studies indicated that MMS offers superior recurrence-free survival rates compared to standard excision. Regarding cost-effectiveness, MMS was found to be more economical over the long term due to reduced recurrence rates and the need for fewer re-excisions. Aesthetic outcomes were comparable between MMS and standard excision, with both methods yielding satisfactory results. Discussion: The findings of this review support the use of MMS as a preferred treatment for high-risk NMSCs, particularly in cosmetically sensitive areas. While MMS may involve higher initial costs, its long-term cost-effectiveness and superior oncologic outcomes justify its use. The aesthetic outcomes associated with MMS are comparable to those of standard excision, making it a viable option for patients concerned with cosmetic results. Limitations: This review acknowledges several limitations, including the heterogeneity of study designs and potential selection biases inherent in the included studies. Additionally, the absence of randomized controlled trials comparing MMS and standard excision directly limits the strength of the conclusions drawn. Conclusions: This narrative review underscores the advantages of MMS in treating high-risk NMSCs, particularly in terms of recurrence rates and long-term cost-effectiveness. While both MMS and standard excision offer comparable aesthetic outcomes, the superior oncologic results of MMS make it a preferable option in certain clinical scenarios. Full article

Background/Objectives: Autologous fat grafting (AFT) has become a widely used technique in breast reconstruction, offering natural aesthetics, tissue integration, and patient satisfaction. However, its clinical outcomes require comparison with implant-based reconstruction (IBR), the most common method in clinical practice. While AFT provides a more natural appearance and avoids foreign body-related complications, issues such as fat resorption, procedural variability, and oncological concerns necessitate further investigation. Additionally, artificial intelligence (AI) has been increasingly integrated into breast imaging and reconstructive planning, improving diagnostic accuracy, procedural optimization, and complication prevention. This study aims to compare AFT and IBR while exploring AI’s role in enhancing breast reconstruction outcomes. Methods: A comprehensive review of clinical studies was conducted to evaluate the advantages, limitations, and oncological implications of AFT versus IBR. AI-driven applications in breast imaging and reconstructive planning were examined for their potential in predicting fat graft retention and optimizing implant selection. Data from systematic reviews and meta-analyses were incorporated to refine reconstruction strategies. Results: AFT offers superior aesthetic outcomes with better tissue integration but presents variability in fat resorption. IBR remains the preferred approach due to its predictability but carries risks of implant-related complications. AI technologies contribute to improved reconstruction planning, enhancing surgical precision and long-term patient outcomes. Conclusions: Optimized patient selection and long-term follow-up are essential for improving breast reconstruction techniques. AI-driven approaches provide valuable tools for enhancing procedural predictability and personalized treatment strategies. Future research should focus on refining AI algorithms and establishing standardized protocols for reconstructive decision-making. Full article

Background: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM), given demonstrated oncologic safety, is widely used for both therapeutic and prophylactic mastectomy. The popularity of NSM has spurred advancements by breast and plastic surgeons, liberalizing the indications for NSM and improving patient and aesthetic reconstructive outcomes. This review explores these developments and establishes up-to-date surgical tenets for successful NSM and reconstruction. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted using the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane Library databases, focusing on peer-reviewed studies published up to 2024. Articles were selected based on relevance, quantity, and documentation of clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction. Results: NSM is utilized frequently for both invasive breast cancers and prophylactic mastectomy, with expanded criteria for candidacy by breast surgeons. Staged procedures such as adjunct reduction, mastopexy, or nipple delay allow patients with larger or ptotic breasts to undergo NSM with comparable outcomes. Long-term outcome studies have identified important risk factors for complications, including smoking history, higher mastectomy weight, certain medical comorbidities, and suboptimal mastectomy flaps. Evolutions in reconstructive decision making in direct-to-implant and staged tissue expander placement have improved aesthetic results while accounting for poor mastectomy flap quality or adjuvant therapy. Long-term outcomes show NSM remains safe and has comparable rates of local recurrence. Patient-reported outcomes demonstrate satisfaction with NSM, especially in sexual and psychological wellbeing metrics. Conclusions: NSM has been demonstrated to be safe in long-term oncologic outcomes. Its widespread popularity over the past ten years has helped identify methods to improve upon surgical and aesthetic outcomes, including decision-making in reconstruction; considerations for challenging patient-related characteristics such as macromastia, ptosis, and NAC asymmetry; and novel advances in areas such as neurotization. Full article

Background/Objectives: Hybrid breast reconstruction (HBR), combining implant-based breast reconstruction (IBR) with autologous fat grafting (FG), has emerged as a promising solution to improve aesthetic outcomes and reduce complications, especially in irradiated patients. This study aims to systematically review current evidence on the outcomes of HBR with a focus on complication rates and aesthetic satisfaction. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed in March 2023 using PubMed and Embase databases. Studies were selected based on predefined PICOS criteria, including adult female patients undergoing IBR with FG. Sixteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Data on patient demographics, surgical techniques, fat grafting timing, complications, and aesthetic outcomes were extracted and analysed. Results: A total of 730 patients were included, with a mean follow-up of 20.23 months. The overall complication rate was 9%, with fat necrosis being the most common (2.7%). Capsular contracture occurred in 4.5% of cases. Immediate fat grafting during implant placement showed the lowest complication rate (8%) compared to delayed or staged procedures. Aesthetic satisfaction was high, with an average score of 4.4 out of 5 in five studies. Fat grafting improved skin quality and contour, especially in irradiated patients, and enabled the use of smaller implants. No oncological recurrences were reported. Conclusions: HBR is associated with high aesthetic satisfaction and a low rate of complications. Immediate fat grafting during IBR appears to be the safest and most effective approach. These findings support the wider adoption of HBR, though further high-quality studies are needed to validate long-term safety and outcomes. Full article

The first web space of the hand plays a fundamental role in daily hand function, facilitating crucial movements, such as pinching, grasping, and opposition. The structural anomalies of acquired defects of this anatomical region, whether secondary to trauma, burns, or post-oncological surgical resections, necessitate meticulous reconstructive strategies to ensure both functional restoration and aesthetic integrity. Given the complexity and variability of first web defects, a broad spectrum of reconstructive techniques has been developed, ranging from skin grafting and local flap reconstructions to advanced microsurgical approaches. This review comprehensively examines the existing literature on first web reconstruction techniques, analyzing their indications, advantages, and limitations. Additionally, it explores innovative techniques and emerging trends in the field, such as tissue engineering, regenerative medicine, and composite tissue allotransplantation, which may revolutionize future reconstructive strategies. The primary objective is to provide clinicians with an evidence-based guide to selecting the most appropriate reconstructive strategy tailored to individual patient needs. Furthermore, we incorporate our institutional experience in managing first web defects, highlighting key surgical principles, patient outcomes, and challenges encountered. Through this analysis, we aim to refine the understanding of first web reconstruction and contribute to the ongoing evolution of hand surgery techniques. Full article

Breast reconstruction after mastectomy improves the quality of life for many patients with breast cancer. There is uncertainty regarding eligibility criteria for reconstruction, timing (immediate or delayed—with or without radiotherapy), outcomes of nipple-sparing compared to skin-sparing mastectomy, selection criteria and surgical factors influencing outcomes of nipple-sparing mastectomy, prepectoral versus subpectoral implants, use of acellular dermal matrix, and use of autologous fat grafting. We conducted a systematic review of these topics to be used as the evidence base for an updated clinical practice guideline on breast reconstruction for Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario). The protocol was registered on PROSPERO, CRD42023409083. Medline, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched until August 2024, and 229 primary studies met the inclusion criteria. Most studies were retrospective non-randomized comparative studies; 5 randomized controlled trials were included. Results suggest nipple-sparing mastectomy is oncologically safe, provided there is no clinical, radiological, or pathological indication of nipple-areolar complex involvement. Surgical factors, including incision location, may affect rates of complications such as necrosis. Both immediate and delayed reconstruction have similar long-term outcomes; however, immediate reconstruction may result in better short to medium-term quality of life. Evidence on whether radiotherapy should modify the timing of initial reconstruction or expander-implant exchange was very limited; studies delayed reconstruction after radiotherapy by at least 3 months and, more commonly, at least 6 months to avoid the period of acute radiation injury. Radiation after immediate reconstruction is a reasonable option. Surgical complications are similar between prepectoral and dual-plane or subpectoral reconstruction; prepectoral placement may give a better quality of life due to lower rates of long-term complications such as pain and animation deformity. Autologous fat grafting was found to be oncologically safe; its use may improve quality of life and aesthetic results. Full article

Background/Objectives: Mandibular reconstruction following trauma or oncologic resection is crucial for restoring function and aesthetics. While autologous bone grafting remains the gold standard, it presents challenges such as donor site morbidity and graft availability. Bone tissue engineering (BTE) offers an innovative alternative, integrating scaffolds, osteogenic cells, and bioactive factors to regenerate functional bone. This systematic review evaluates BTE strategies for mandibular reconstruction, focusing on critical-sized defects in large animal models and their translational potential for clinical applications. Methods: A systematic review was performed following PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies involved large animal models and critical-sized mandibular defects treated with at least two BTE components (scaffold, osteogenic cells, or growth factors). Quality and bias assessments were conducted using ARRIVE guidelines and SYRCLE tools. Results: Of the 6088 studies screened, 27 met the inclusion criteria, focusing on critical-sized mandibular defects in large animal models such as pigs, sheep, and dogs. Common scaffolds included β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA), and polycaprolactone (PCL), frequently combined with bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) and growth factors like recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2). Preclinical outcomes demonstrated effective bone regeneration, vascularization, and biomechanical restoration. Advanced strategies, including in vivo bioreactors and 3D-printed scaffolds, further enhanced regeneration. However, challenges such as incomplete scaffold degradation, hypoxic conditions within constructs, and variability in growth factor efficacy and dose optimization were observed, emphasizing the need for further refinement to ensure consistent outcomes. Conclusions: BTE shows promise in mandibular reconstruction, achieving bone regeneration and functional restoration in preclinical models of critical-sized defects. However, challenges such as scaffold optimization, vascularization enhancement, and protocol standardization require further investigation to facilitate clinical translation. These findings emphasize the need for refinement to achieve consistent, scalable outcomes for clinical use. Full article

Background/Objectives: Cranial reconstruction (cranioplasty) is a surgical procedure performed to restore skull function and aesthetics following trauma, oncological conditions, or congenital defects. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is commonly used for the postoperative monitoring and diagnosis of patients with cranial implants. However, MRI artifacts caused by these implants can compromise imaging accuracy and diagnostic precision. This study aims to evaluate the extent of MRI artifacts caused by titanium and polyether ether ketone (PEEK) cranial implants and to identify optimal imaging sequences to minimize these artifacts. Methods: Phantom skull models with cranial defects of varying sizes (one-quarter, one-third, and one-half of the skull) were used to simulate real-world clinical conditions. The defects were filled with a water-based medium containing simulated brain tissue and tumor models. Custom 3D-printed titanium and PEEK cranial implants were fixed onto the phantom skulls and scanned using 1.5 T and 3 T MRI scanners. Various imaging sequences were tested, with a focus on optimizing parameters to reduce artifact formation. Turbo Spin Echo (TSE) sequences with fat saturation were implemented to assess their effectiveness in artifact reduction. Results: The study found that MRI artifacts varied based on the implant material, defect size, and magnetic field strength. A higher field strength (3 T) resulted in more pronounced artifacts. However, the use of TSE sequences with fat saturation significantly reduced artifacts and improved lesion visualization, enhancing diagnostic accuracy. Conclusions: This research highlights the importance of optimized MRI protocols when imaging patients with cranial implants. Proper selection of imaging sequences, particularly TSE with fat saturation, can mitigate artifacts and improve diagnostic precision, ultimately benefiting patient outcomes in clinical radiology. Full article

Breast cancer treatment has evolved significantly in recent decades, with personalized care models gaining prominence both for the optimization of oncological outcomes and aesthetic results. At the Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS in Rome, Italy, we have developed a multidisciplinary, evidence-based model for the management of breast cancer patients, called ROME (Radiological and Oncoplastic Multidisciplinary Evaluation). This innovative model integrates the expertise of various specialists in a seamless, patient-centered approach to improve treatment planning and outcomes. ROME involves a collaborative framework between radiologists, oncologists, surgeons, pathologists, oncoplastic specialists and psychologists. The process begins with the detailed radiological evaluation of tumors using advanced imaging techniques, which is then complemented by an oncoplastic assessment to evaluate potential surgical approaches that ensure optimal oncological resections while preserving or enhancing breast aesthetics. The combination of these evaluations allows the team to tailor treatment plans according to the patient’s specific clinical profile, including tumor characteristics, genetic factors, and aesthetic considerations. A key feature of the ROME model is the continuous integration of evidence-based guidelines with real-time multidisciplinary input. This enables the personalization of surgical strategies, ensuring that each patient receives a treatment plan that balances the need for effective cancer control with the desire for an optimal aesthetic result. Since its implementation, ROME has demonstrated significant improvements in both oncological and cosmetic outcomes, leading to enhanced patient satisfaction and quality of life. The success of ROME underscores the importance of a holistic and collaborative approach to breast cancer treatment, one that integrates clinical, radiological, and aesthetic perspectives to offer a truly personalized and patient-focused care experience. As evidence continues to accumulate, ROME stands as a model for personalized breast cancer surgery, setting a new standard for care in multidisciplinary oncology settings. Full article

Background: Macromastia is a well-known issue in breast reconstruction. Skin-reducing mastectomy (SRM) was introduced as a skin-sparing mastectomy that utilizes a skin reduction pattern similar to breast reduction or breast lift surgery, specifically to manage hypertrophic and pendulous breasts. Over time, numerous authors have contributed to refining the SRM technique, leading to the development of various technical variants. However, the diversity of approaches inspired by SRM has created confusion, and clear surgical indications are lacking. Methods: We propose a unifying concept called breast reshaping mastectomy (BRM), which encompasses all techniques based on SRM principles. The BRM aims not only to preserve and reduce the breast skin envelope but also to immediately reshape it for a more aesthetic outcome. This approach is applicable to all mastectomies where skin envelope preservation (with or without the nipple-areola complex) is oncologically safe, a modification of breast skin coverage is needed for better aesthetic results, and an implant-based reconstruction is planned. Results: To define the BRM concept, we reviewed the existing literature on SRM and its related techniques. Our analysis focused on four key elements: skin incision pattern, implant coverage strategy, nipple-areola complex (NAC) management, and the choice between two-stage and direct-to-implant reconstruction. Conclusions: By integrating these four components into a single surgical framework, BRM provides a structured approach to breast reconstruction that enhances both oncologic safety and aesthetic outcomes. Standardizing these techniques could help clarify surgical indications and improve reconstructive planning for patients undergoing skin-sparing mastectomy. Full article

Breast cancer remains the most common malignancy in women, and breast-conserving surgery (BCS) with adjuvant radiotherapy is a standard treatment for early-stage disease. This study assessed the impact of positive surgical margins and secondary surgeries on local recurrence rates and patient outcomes. In this retrospective tumor registry-based study, 24,450 women were eligible for analysis. Of them, 18,082 underwent primary BCS only, 4836 underwent re-excision by BCS, and 1532 underwent re-excision by mastectomy following primary BCS. Our findings indicate that even though re-excision procedures were associated with higher local recurrence rates (HR 1.19; 95% CI 1.08–1.33), they did not significantly affect long-term survival (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.87–1.10). This underscores the need for meticulous surgical practices to achieve clean margins initially, and suggests that the choice of surgical intervention should consider individual tumor characteristics and patient preferences to optimize oncological and aesthetic outcomes. Full article

Background/Objectives: Spino-plastic surgery describes a specialized, multidisciplinary approach to addressing various spinal pathologies. The field is the innovative product of a multidisciplinary collaboration between plastic and reconstructive, orthopedic, and neurosurgery. Over the last few decades, this collaboration has borne promising surgical techniques and treatment plans geared toward restoring form, function, and aesthetics in patients with a variety of spinal conditions, including failed fusions, pseudoarthrosis, and the need for oncologic reconstruction. This paper explores the application of spino-plastic surgery in the context of post-sarcoma resection reconstructions, focusing on the efficacy in addressing the unique challenges posed by extensive tissue loss and structural deformities. Methods: Our study reviews a series of cases wherein spino-plastic techniques were utilized in patients with sarcomas of the spine and adjacent structures. We also discuss the technical considerations, including preoperative planning, intraoperative challenges, and overall patient care, that are crucial for the success of spino-plastic procedures. Results: The outcomes demonstrate significant improvements in patient mobility, pain reduction, and overall quality of life. Most notably, spino-plastic surgical techniques help facilitate the restoration of functional anatomy by leveraging vascularized bone grafts and muscle flaps, thereby enhancing long-term stability and reducing the risk of complications such as nonunion or infection. Conclusions: Spino-plastic collaboration represents a pivotal advancement in oncologic treatment, spinal care, and reconstructive surgery, offering new hope for patients undergoing post-sarcoma reconstruction. Further research and refinement of the techniques will only expand their application and improve outcomes for a broader range of patients in the future. Full article