Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (20)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = non-invasive PGT

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
23 pages, 996 KB  
Review
The Role of Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Monogenic Disorders (PGT-M) in Hemoglobinopathy Management—Techniques, Accuracy, and the Balancing of Benefits and Drawbacks
by Rasrawee Chantrasiri, Tawiwan Pantasri, Siriporn Chattipakorn, Nipon Chattipakorn, Sirinart Kumfu and Wirawit Piyamongkol
Biomolecules 2025, 15(10), 1472; https://doi.org/10.3390/biom15101472 - 17 Oct 2025
Viewed by 2066
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) is a powerful tool for identifying genetic disorders prior to gestation. For hemoglobinopathies like thalassemias and sickle cell disease, PGT-M offers a preventative strategy to ensure that only embryos deemed genetically healthy are transferred. A comprehensive [...] Read more.
Preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorders (PGT-M) is a powerful tool for identifying genetic disorders prior to gestation. For hemoglobinopathies like thalassemias and sickle cell disease, PGT-M offers a preventative strategy to ensure that only embryos deemed genetically healthy are transferred. A comprehensive review of 22 original articles explores and summarizes the existing evidence on PGT-M techniques in hemoglobinopathies. The review focuses on key aspects such as accuracy, benefits, and drawbacks related to various hemoglobinopathies. Given the limited quantity of DNA obtained from an embryo biopsy, whole genome amplification (WGA) is a critical step for amplifying the sample. One of the available methods of WGA, multiple displacement amplification (MDA) is one of the most widely adopted method with acceptable allele drop-out (ADO) rates for hemoglobinopathies compared with traditional methods. Dealing with ADO constitutes a primary technical obstacle in PGT-M. The failure to amplify one allele in single-cell analysis is a major factor limiting the overall diagnostic accuracy of the procedure. To mitigate this issue, PCR-based and next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based approaches are employed. These methods incorporate linkage analysis with genetic markers such as short tandem repeats (STRs) or single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to reduce the risk of incorrect interpretations from ADO and enhance the proportion of conclusive results. A future direction for PGT-M that involves the development of non-invasive methods (niPGT) will be included and discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Molecular Genetics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 456 KB  
Review
Noninvasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing in Recurrent Pregnancy Loss and Implantation Failure: Breakthrough or Overpromise?
by Grzegorz Mrugacz, Aleksandra Mospinek, Joanna Głowacka, Oskar Sprawski, Lidia Kawałek, Wiktoria Gąsior, Julita Machałowska, Yekaterina Sidorova, Patrycja Borecka, Aleksandra Bojanowska and Weronika Szczepańska
Cells 2025, 14(20), 1591; https://doi.org/10.3390/cells14201591 - 14 Oct 2025
Viewed by 1981
Abstract
Background: Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) and recurrent implantation failure (RIF) are significant challenges in reproductive medicine. For both, embryonic aneuploidy is the leading etiological factor. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) via trophectoderm biopsy is the current standard for embryo selection. However, [...] Read more.
Background: Recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) and recurrent implantation failure (RIF) are significant challenges in reproductive medicine. For both, embryonic aneuploidy is the leading etiological factor. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) via trophectoderm biopsy is the current standard for embryo selection. However, it is limited by its invasiveness, potential for embryo damage, and diagnostic errors due to mosaicism. Rationale/Objectives: This review critically evaluates the emerging role of noninvasive PGT (niPGT). NiPGT analyzes cell-free DNA from spent blastocyst culture media, thus, it is a potential alternative for managing RPL and RIF. Hence, the primary objective is to determine whether current evidence supports niPGT as a reliable replacement for conventional biopsy-based PGT-A in these high-risk populations. Outcomes: The analysis reveals that niPGT offers significant theoretical advantages. These include complete non-invasiveness, enhanced embryo preservation, and high patient acceptability. However, its clinical application is hampered by substantial limitations. Key amongst them is the inconsistent and often suboptimal diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity 70–85%, specificity 88–92%) compared to biopsy. Other significant factors include the high rates of amplification failure (10–50%), vulnerability to maternal DNA contamination, as well as low DNA yield. Crucially, there is a definitive lack of robust, prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) data demonstrating improved live birth rates or reduced miscarriage rates specifically in RPL and RIF cohorts. As such, niPGT is not yet ready to be a standalone clinical adoption in RPL and RIF cases. However, it may serve as a valuable adjunct for rescue scenarios following biopsy failure or for ethical reasons. Wider Implications: The integration of niPGT with artificial intelligence, time-lapse imaging, and multi-omics profiling underlies a promising future. However, its transition from a predominantly research tool to a clinical standard necessitates various critical undertakings. These include rigorous multicenter RCTs, standardizing international protocol, and tailoring validation for the RPL and RIF subgroups. This review highlights the need for cautious optimism, positing that evidence-based integration, rather than premature adoption, is essential to realizing niPGT’s full potential without compromising patient care in these complex fertility scenarios. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Reproductive Biology: Cellular and Molecular Mechanisms)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

23 pages, 627 KB  
Review
Time-Lapse Imaging in IVF: Bridging the Gap Between Promises and Clinical Realities
by Grzegorz Mrugacz, Igor Bołkun, Tomasz Magoń, Izabela Korowaj, Beata Golka, Tomasz Pluta, Olena Fedak, Paulina Cieśla, Joanna Zowczak and Ewelina Skórka
Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2025, 26(19), 9609; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms26199609 - 1 Oct 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2902
Abstract
Time-lapse imaging (TLI) has emerged as a transformative technology in in vitro fertilization (IVF). This is because it offers continuous, non-invasive embryo assessment through morphokinetic profiling. It demonstrates key advantages such as reduced embryologist subjectivity, detection of dynamic anomalies, and improved implantation rates [...] Read more.
Time-lapse imaging (TLI) has emerged as a transformative technology in in vitro fertilization (IVF). This is because it offers continuous, non-invasive embryo assessment through morphokinetic profiling. It demonstrates key advantages such as reduced embryologist subjectivity, detection of dynamic anomalies, and improved implantation rates in niche populations. However, its clinical utility remains debated. Large trials and meta-analyses reveal no universal improvement in live birth rates compared to conventional methods. Key challenges underlying the outcome include algorithm generalizability, lab-specific protocol variability, and high costs. Nevertheless, TLI shows promise in specific contexts. For instance, Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidies (PGT-A) cycles where it reduces unnecessary biopsies by predicting euploidy. However, even in this, its benefits are marginal in unselected populations. This review synthesizes evidence to highlight that TLI’s value is context-dependent, not universal. As such, adoption must be cautious to avoid resource misallocation without significant IVF outcome improvements. In future, personalized protocols, integration with non-invasive biomarkers, and multicenter collaboration are crucial to optimize TLI’s potential in assisted reproduction. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Molecular Research on Reproductive Physiology and Endocrinology)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

9 pages, 469 KB  
Review
Deep Learning Models: Their Relationship with Embryonic Euploidies and Reproductive Outcomes
by Aikaterini Selntigia, Lucia Maresca, Diletta Montanino Oliva, Camilla Coianiz and Daniela Galliano
Genes 2025, 16(8), 981; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16080981 - 20 Aug 2025
Viewed by 1834
Abstract
Background: Embryo selection in in vitro fertilization (IVF) aims to prioritize embryos with the highest reproductive potential. While preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) remains the gold standard for identifying euploid embryos, it is invasive and not universally applicable. Deep learning (DL)-based models, [...] Read more.
Background: Embryo selection in in vitro fertilization (IVF) aims to prioritize embryos with the highest reproductive potential. While preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) remains the gold standard for identifying euploid embryos, it is invasive and not universally applicable. Deep learning (DL)-based models, such as the intelligent data analysis (iDA) score, have emerged as non-invasive alternatives for embryo assessment. This review critically evaluates the relationship between iDAScore (versions 1.0 and 2.0), embryo euploidy, and clinical outcomes, including live birth and miscarriage rates. Methods: A narrative review was performed using PubMed and Google Scholar, covering studies published from January 2020 to May 2025. The search included terms such as “iDAScore,” “deep learning,” “euploidy,” and “live birth.” Only English-language full-text studies assessing the predictive performance of iDAScore relative to chromosomal status or reproductive outcomes were included. Results: Six retrospective studies met the inclusion criteria. All reported a statistically significant association between higher iDAScore values and embryo euploidy. AUC values for euploidy prediction ranged from 0.60 to 0.68. In several studies, iDAScore was also positively associated with live birth rates and negatively with miscarriage rates. However, the predictive accuracy was moderate when restricted to euploid embryo cohorts, indicating that iDAScore may be more effective in broader populations where chromosomal status is unknown. Conclusions: iDAScore represents a promising adjunct to traditional embryo assessment. Although it cannot replace PGT-A, it may aid in embryo prioritization when genetic testing is not feasible. Larger prospective studies are warranted to further validate its clinical utility. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Bioinformatics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

34 pages, 448 KB  
Systematic Review
Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Accuracy of Non-Invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing (niPGT) Compared to Invasive Embryo Biopsy
by Charalampos Voros, Menelaos Darlas, Diamantis Athanasiou, Antonia Athanasiou, Aikaterini Athanasiou, Kyriakos Bananis, Georgios Papadimas, Charalampos Tsimpoukelis, Athanasios Gkirgkinoudis, Ioakeim Sapantzoglou, Ioannis Papapanagiotou, Dimitrios Vaitsis, Aristotelis-Marios Koulakmanidis, Vasileios Topalis, Nikolaos Thomakos, Marianna Theodora, Panagiotis Antsaklis, Fotios Chatzinikolaou, Hans Atli Dahl, Georgios Daskalakis and Dimitrios Loutradisadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
Biomedicines 2025, 13(8), 2010; https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13082010 - 18 Aug 2025
Viewed by 2948
Abstract
Background: Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is a popular approach in assisted reproductive technology that improves embryo selection and implantation rates. Traditional approaches rely on trophectoderm (TE) biopsy, which is an invasive procedure that might jeopardize embryo integrity and create technical constraints [...] Read more.
Background: Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is a popular approach in assisted reproductive technology that improves embryo selection and implantation rates. Traditional approaches rely on trophectoderm (TE) biopsy, which is an invasive procedure that might jeopardize embryo integrity and create technical constraints such as mosaicism-related misclassification. Non-invasive preimplantation genetic testing (niPGT) has emerged as a possible alternative, using embryonic cell-free DNA (cfDNA) extracted from wasted culture media or blastocoel fluid to assess chromosomal status without requiring direct embryo manipulation. Methods: This systematic study investigates the molecular mechanisms behind cfDNA release, its biological properties, and the technological concerns that influence its utilization in niPGT. We look at recent advances in next-generation sequencing (NGS), whole-genome amplification (WGA), and bioinformatic techniques that improve cfDNA-based aneuploidy detection. In addition, we compare the sensitivity, specificity, and concordance rates of niPGT to conventional TE biopsy, highlighting the major aspects impacting its diagnostic performance. Results: The release of cfDNA from embryos is influenced by apoptotic and necrotic processes, active DNA shedding, and extracellular vesicle secretion, which results in fragmented chromosomal material of different qualities and quantities. While niPGT has shown promise as a noninvasive screening approach, significant variability in cfDNA yield, maternal DNA contamination, and sequencing biases all have an impact on test accuracy. Studies show that niPGT and TE biopsies have moderate-to-high concordance, although there are still issues in detecting mosaicism, segmental aneuploidies, and DNA degradation artifacts. Conclusions: NiPGT is a safer and less intrusive alternative to TE biopsy, with potential clinical benefits. However, technical advancements are required to improve cfDNA collecting procedures, reduce contamination, and improve sequencing accuracy. Additional large-scale validation studies are needed to create standardized methodologies and ensure that niPGT achieves the diagnostic reliability requirements required for widespread clinical deployment in IVF programs. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Advances in Human Reproductive Biology)
Show Figures

Scheme 1

21 pages, 1417 KB  
Review
Non-Invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing
by Daniela N. Bakalova, Luis Navarro-Sánchez and Carmen Rubio
Genes 2025, 16(5), 552; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16050552 - 30 Apr 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 6618
Abstract
To minimise the influence of chromosomal abnormalities during IVF treatment, embryos can be screened before transfer using preimplantation genetic testing. This typically involves an invasive trophectoderm biopsy at the blastocyst stage, where 4–8 cells are collected and analysed. However, emerging evidence indicates that, [...] Read more.
To minimise the influence of chromosomal abnormalities during IVF treatment, embryos can be screened before transfer using preimplantation genetic testing. This typically involves an invasive trophectoderm biopsy at the blastocyst stage, where 4–8 cells are collected and analysed. However, emerging evidence indicates that, as embryos develop in vitro in culture media, they release cell-free DNA into the media, providing an alternative source of genetic material that can be accessed non-invasively. Spent blastocyst media samples that contain embryo cell-free DNA demonstrate high informativity rates and ploidy concordance when compared with the corresponding trophectoderm, inner cell mass, or whole blastocyst results. However, optimising this non-invasive approach requires several changes to embryo culture protocols, including additional embryo washes to tackle contamination and extending embryo culture time to maximise the amount of cell-free DNA released into the culture media. In this review, we discuss this novel non-invasive approach for aneuploidy detection and embryo prioritisation, as well as the current data and future prospects for utilising cell-free DNA analysis to identify structural rearrangements and single gene disorders. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 564 KB  
Review
Reproductive Choices in Haemoglobinopathies: The Role of Preimplantation Genetic Testing
by Georgia Kakourou, Christina Vrettou, Thalia Mamas and Joanne Traeger-Synodinos
Genes 2025, 16(4), 360; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes16040360 - 21 Mar 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1883
Abstract
Haemoglobinopathies are among the most prevalent genetic disorders globally. In the context of these conditions, preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) plays a pivotal role in preventing genetic diseases in the offspring of carrier parents, reducing the need for pregnancy termination and enabling the selection [...] Read more.
Haemoglobinopathies are among the most prevalent genetic disorders globally. In the context of these conditions, preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) plays a pivotal role in preventing genetic diseases in the offspring of carrier parents, reducing the need for pregnancy termination and enabling the selection of compatible sibling donors for potential stem cell transplantation in cases of thalassemia or sickle cell disease. This review explores the evolving role of PGT as a reproductive option for haemoglobinopathy carriers, tracing the development of PGT protocols from patient-specific to comprehensive testing enabled by advanced technologies like next-generation sequencing (NGS). We discuss key technical, biological, and practical limitations of PGT, as well as the ethical considerations specific to haemoglobinopathies, such as the complexity of interpreting genotypes. Emerging technologies, such as whole-genome sequencing, non-invasive PGT, and gene editing, hold significant promise for expanding applications but also raise new challenges that must be addressed. It will be interesting to explore how advancements in technology, along with the changing management of haemoglobinopathies, will impact reproductive choices. It is anticipated that continued research will improve genetic counseling for PGT for haemoglobinopathies, while a careful evaluation of ethical and societal implications is also required. Responsible and equitable implementation of PGT is essential for ensuring that all families at risk can make informed reproductive choices. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

22 pages, 530 KB  
Article
Comparison of Non-Invasive and Minimally Invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy Using Samples Derived from the Same Embryo Culture
by Anna Bednarska-Czerwińska, Joanna Smoleń-Dzirba, Anna Strychalska, Wojciech Sierka, Urszula Wróblewska, Patrycja Mermer, Barbara Masarczyk, Natalia Jodłowiec-Lubańska, Anna Kokot, Klaudia Simka-Lampa, Nikola Zmarzły, Emilia Morawiec, Aneta Orczyk and Beniamin Oskar Grabarek
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(1), 33; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14010033 - 25 Dec 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3568
Abstract
Background/Objectives: To assess the ploidy status of embryos via preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), a biopsy of trophectoderm (TE) cells can be performed. However, this approach is considered invasive, and therefore the aim of this study was to identify the optimal [...] Read more.
Background/Objectives: To assess the ploidy status of embryos via preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), a biopsy of trophectoderm (TE) cells can be performed. However, this approach is considered invasive, and therefore the aim of this study was to identify the optimal sample type and sampling day for non-invasive or minimally invasive PGT-A (ni/miPGT-A) in terms of data quality and concordance rates with TE biopsies derived from the same embryos. Methods: This study was performed using 239 embryo cultures. After optimization using 96 embryos, non-invasive spent culture media (SCM) and a minimally invasive combination of blastocoel fluid and SCM (BF+SCM), along with the corresponding TE samples, were collected from 143 embryos cultured for 5 days (n = 70) or 6 days (n = 73), and all were subjected to ni/miPGT-A with whole-genome amplification followed by next-generation sequencing. Results: The amplification failure rate was lower for SCM samples than for BF+SCM (SCM: 0.7%, 1/143 vs. BF+SCM: 7.7%, 11/143; p = 0.005). The rate of ploidy concordance with TE was significantly higher for SCM samples than for BF+SCM samples (SCM: 83.7%, 118/141 vs. BF+SCM: 58%, 76/131; p < 0.001). Among SCM samples, concordance rates were higher for samples derived from embryos cultured for 6 days (87.5%, 63/72) than for 5 days (79.7%, 55/69). In the embryos cultured for 6 days, discordant cases included five (6.9%) SCM samples with falsely negative (euploid) results that were deemed to be mosaic according to TE and four (5.6%) samples falsely found to be aneuploid. Conclusions: SCM samples derived from embryos cultured for 6 days can be applied in niPGT-A with subsequent verification of aneuploid samples using TE biopsy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1584 KB  
Review
Advancements and Challenges in Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidies: In the Pathway to Non-Invasive Techniques
by Ana del Arco de la Paz, Carla Giménez-Rodríguez, Aikaterini Selntigia, Marcos Meseguer and Daniela Galliano
Genes 2024, 15(12), 1613; https://doi.org/10.3390/genes15121613 - 17 Dec 2024
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 5822
Abstract
The evolution of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) techniques has been crucial in assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs), improving embryo selection and increasing success rates in in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatments. Techniques ranging from fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to next-generation sequencing (NGS) [...] Read more.
The evolution of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) techniques has been crucial in assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs), improving embryo selection and increasing success rates in in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatments. Techniques ranging from fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) to next-generation sequencing (NGS) have relied on cellular material extraction through biopsies of blastomeres at the cleavage stage on day three or from trophectoderm (TE) cells of the blastocyst. However, this has raised concerns about its potential impact on embryo development. As a result, there has been growing interest in developing non-invasive techniques for detecting aneuploidies, such as the analysis of blastocoel fluid (BF), spent culture medium (SCM), and artificial intelligence (AI) models. Non-invasive methods represent a promising advancement in PGT-A, offering the ability to detect aneuploidies without compromising embryo viability. This article reviews the evolution and principles of PGT-A, analyzing both traditional techniques and emerging non-invasive approaches, while highlighting the advantages and challenges associated with these methodologies. Furthermore, it explores the transformative potential of these innovations, which could optimize genetic screening and significantly improve clinical outcomes in the field of assisted reproduction. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 934 KB  
Article
Temporal Evaluation of a Minimally Invasive Method of Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy (mi-PGT-A) in Human Embryos
by Katharine R. B. Phillips, Alexander G. Kuzma-Hunt, Michael S. Neal, Connie Lisle, Hariharan Sribalachandran, Ronald F. Carter, Shilpa Amin, Megan F. Karnis and Mehrnoosh Faghih
Reprod. Med. 2024, 5(3), 97-112; https://doi.org/10.3390/reprodmed5030011 - 8 Jul 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 4137
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) has become a useful approach for embryo selection following IVF and ICSI. However, the biopsy process associated with PGT-A is expensive, prone to errors in embryo ploidy determination, and potentially damaging, impacting competence and implantation potential. Therefore, [...] Read more.
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) has become a useful approach for embryo selection following IVF and ICSI. However, the biopsy process associated with PGT-A is expensive, prone to errors in embryo ploidy determination, and potentially damaging, impacting competence and implantation potential. Therefore, a less invasive method of PGT-A would be desirable and more cost-effective. Noninvasive methods for PGT-A (ni-PGT-A) have been well-studied but present limitations in terms of cf-DNA origin and diagnostic accuracy. Minimally invasive pre-implantation genetic testing (mi-PGT-A) for frozen-thawed embryo transfer is a promising, less studied approach that utilizes a combination of spent culture media (SCM) and blastocoelic fluid (BF)-derived cell-free (CF)-DNA for genetic testing. This study aimed to optimize the effectiveness of mi-PGT-A for aneuploidy diagnosis by investigating the optimal temporal sequence for this protocol. SCM+BF was collected at either 48 or 72 h of culture after thawing day 3 preimplantation embryos. cf-DNA in the SCM+BF was amplified, analyzed by next-generation sequencing (NGS) and compared with results from the corresponding whole embryos (WEs) obtained from human embryos donated for research. Fifty-three (42 expanded blastocysts, 9 early blastocysts, and 2 morula) WE and SCM+BF samples were analyzed and compared. The overall concordance rate between SCM+BF and WE was 60%. Gender and ploidy concordance improved with extended culture time from 48 h (73% and 45%) to 72 h (100% and 64%), respectively. These results demonstrate that SCM+BF-derived cf-DNA can be successfully used for mi-PGT-A. Our findings indicate that longer embryo culture time prior to SCM+BF-derived cf-DNA analysis improves DNA detection rate and concordance with WEs and decreases the proportion of false positive results. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 1609 KB  
Review
Evolution of Minimally Invasive and Non-Invasive Preimplantation Genetic Testing: An Overview
by Efthalia Moustakli, Athanasios Zikopoulos, Charikleia Skentou, Ioanna Bouba, Konstantinos Dafopoulos and Ioannis Georgiou
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(8), 2160; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13082160 - 9 Apr 2024
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 5411
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) has become a common supplementary diagnοstic/testing tοol for in vitro fertilization (ΙVF) cycles due to a significant increase in cases of PGT fοr mοnogenic cοnditions (ΡGT-M) and de novο aneuplοidies (ΡGT-A) over the last ten years. This tendency is [...] Read more.
Preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) has become a common supplementary diagnοstic/testing tοol for in vitro fertilization (ΙVF) cycles due to a significant increase in cases of PGT fοr mοnogenic cοnditions (ΡGT-M) and de novο aneuplοidies (ΡGT-A) over the last ten years. This tendency is mostly attributable to the advancement and application of novel cytogenetic and molecular techniques in clinical practice that are capable of providing an efficient evaluation of the embryonic chromosomal complement and leading to better IVF/ICSI results. Although PGT is widely used, it requires invasive biopsy of the blastocyst, which may harm the embryo. Non-invasive approaches, like cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing, have lower risks but have drawbacks in consistency and sensitivity. This review discusses new developments and opportunities in the field of preimplantation genetic testing, enhancing the overall effectiveness and accessibility of preimplantation testing in the framework of developments in genomic sequencing, bioinformatics, and the integration of artificial intelligence in the interpretation of genetic data. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Challenges in Diagnosis and Treatment of Infertility)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 7146 KB  
Article
A Self-Pumping Composite Dressing Improved Hypertrophic Scar Healing with Dual Therapy and Active-Fluid Transport
by Kam-Che Lui, Nuruzzaman Noor, Chi-Wai Kan and Xungai Wang
J. Compos. Sci. 2023, 7(5), 192; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs7050192 - 8 May 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 4046
Abstract
Silicone gel sheeting (SGS) and pressure garment therapy (PGT) are the International Clinical Recommendations on Scar Management’s (ICRSM) two principal non-invasive scar-healing procedures. This study created a new PGT-SGS composite (PGF-Biopor®AB-based) via pre-strained screen printing. The Biopor®AB hydrophobicity and [...] Read more.
Silicone gel sheeting (SGS) and pressure garment therapy (PGT) are the International Clinical Recommendations on Scar Management’s (ICRSM) two principal non-invasive scar-healing procedures. This study created a new PGT-SGS composite (PGF-Biopor®AB-based) via pre-strained screen printing. The Biopor®AB hydrophobicity and nylon-hydrophilicity enabled self-pumping for PGT-SGS dual therapy and pressure-driven “warp insertions” mobility facilitates active-fluid transportation. Integrating both therapies in a single PGT-SGS composite achieved efficacy optimization, and the 3D channel structure allowed trauma-free active-fluid transport. The 3D channel topology enables smooth diffusional transport in active-fluid transport environments—and active “nylon absorbency” improved water uptake and enhanced permeability capabilities with sustainability achieved dynamic hydration. The sole use of PGF-Biopor®AB composite in empirical trials verified dual therapy with trauma-free active-fluid transport with one-month efficacy, providing a new route for dual treatment and active scar management. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Composites Applications)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 856 KB  
Article
Impact of Breast Cancer and Germline BRCA Pathogenic Variants on Fertility Preservation in Young Women
by Elze Prokurotaite, Margherita Condorelli, Julie Dechene, Jason Bouziotis, Matteo Lambertini and Isabelle Demeestere
Life 2023, 13(4), 930; https://doi.org/10.3390/life13040930 - 1 Apr 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2760
Abstract
Background: Several studies have suggested that breast cancer (BC) and germline BRCA pathogenic variants (gBRCA PVs) could have a deleterious impact on ovarian reserve. Nevertheless, data are limited and mixed. Our objective was to evaluate the performance of fertility preservation (FP) in terms [...] Read more.
Background: Several studies have suggested that breast cancer (BC) and germline BRCA pathogenic variants (gBRCA PVs) could have a deleterious impact on ovarian reserve. Nevertheless, data are limited and mixed. Our objective was to evaluate the performance of fertility preservation (FP) in terms of the number of collected mature oocytes after ovarian stimulation (OS) in young women carrying a gBRCA PV, associated or not with BC. Methods: We conducted a retrospective monocentric study at HUB-Hôpital Erasme in Brussels. All women aged between 18 and 41 years diagnosed with invasive non-metastatic BC and/or gBRCA PV carriers who underwent OS for FP or preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disorder (PGT-M) between November 2012 and October 2021 were included. Three groups were compared: BC patients without a gBRCA PV, BC patients with a gBRCA PV, and healthy gBRCA PV carriers. Ovarian reserve was evaluated based on the efficacy of OS and AMH levels. Results: A total of 85 patients underwent 100 cycles. The mean age (32.2 ± 3.9 years; p = 0.61) and median AMH level (1.9 [0.2–13] μg/L; p = 0.22) were similar between groups. Correlations between the number of mature oocytes and AMH level (p < 0.001) and between AMH and age (p < 0.001) were observed. No differences in the number of retrieved mature oocytes were observed between groups (p = 0.41), or for other OS parameters. Conclusion: Neither BC nor a gBRCA PV significantly affects ovarian reserve and FP efficacy in terms of the number of mature oocytes retrieved. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

24 pages, 5228 KB  
Review
PGT-SR: A Comprehensive Overview and a Requiem for the Interchromosomal Effect
by Darren K. Griffin and Cagri Ogur
DNA 2023, 3(1), 41-64; https://doi.org/10.3390/dna3010004 - 6 Mar 2023
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 19089
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) was one of the first applications of PGT, with initial cases being worked up in the Delhanty lab. It is the least well-known of the various forms of PGT but nonetheless provides effective treatment for many [...] Read more.
Preimplantation genetic testing for structural rearrangements (PGT-SR) was one of the first applications of PGT, with initial cases being worked up in the Delhanty lab. It is the least well-known of the various forms of PGT but nonetheless provides effective treatment for many carrier couples. Structural chromosomal rearrangements (SRs) lead to infertility, repeated implantation failure, pregnancy loss, and congenitally affected children, despite the balanced parent carrier having no obvious phenotype. A high risk of generating chromosomally unbalanced gametes and embryos is the rationale for PGT-SR, aiming to select for those that are chromosomally normal, or at least balanced like the carrier parent. PGT-SR largely uses the same technology as PGT-A, i.e., initially FISH, superseded by array CGH, SNP arrays, Karyomapping, and, most recently, next-generation sequencing (NGS). Trophectoderm biopsy is now the most widely used sampling approach of all PGT variants, though there are prospects for non-invasive methods. In PGT-SR, the most significant limiting factor is the availability of normal or balanced embryo(s) for transfer. Factors directly affecting this are rearrangement type, chromosomes involved, and sex of the carrier parent. De novo aneuploidy, especially for older mothers, is a common limiting factor. PGT-SR studies provide a wealth of information, much of which can be useful to genetic counselors and the patients they treat. It is applicable in the fundamental study of basic chromosomal biology, in particular the purported existence of an interchromosomal effect (ICE). An ICE means essentially that the existence of one chromosomal defect (e.g., brought about by malsegregation of translocation chromosomes) can perpetuate the existence of others (e.g., de novo aneuploidy). Recent large cohort studies of PGT-SR patients seem, however, to have laid this notion to rest, at least for human embryonic development. Unless new evidence comes to light, this comprehensive review should serve as a requiem. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue In Memoriam of Joy Dorothy Ann Delhanty)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

18 pages, 2663 KB  
Article
Towards Automation in IVF: Pre-Clinical Validation of a Deep Learning-Based Embryo Grading System during PGT-A Cycles
by Danilo Cimadomo, Viviana Chiappetta, Federica Innocenti, Gaia Saturno, Marilena Taggi, Anabella Marconetto, Valentina Casciani, Laura Albricci, Roberta Maggiulli, Giovanni Coticchio, Aisling Ahlström, Jørgen Berntsen, Mark Larman, Andrea Borini, Alberto Vaiarelli, Filippo Maria Ubaldi and Laura Rienzi
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(5), 1806; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12051806 - 23 Feb 2023
Cited by 36 | Viewed by 7346
Abstract
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) is arguably the most effective embryo selection strategy. Nevertheless, it requires greater workload, costs, and expertise. Therefore, a quest towards user-friendly, non-invasive strategies is ongoing. Although insufficient to replace PGT-A, embryo morphological evaluation is significantly associated with [...] Read more.
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) is arguably the most effective embryo selection strategy. Nevertheless, it requires greater workload, costs, and expertise. Therefore, a quest towards user-friendly, non-invasive strategies is ongoing. Although insufficient to replace PGT-A, embryo morphological evaluation is significantly associated with embryonic competence, but scarcely reproducible. Recently, artificial intelligence-powered analyses have been proposed to objectify and automate image evaluations. iDAScore v1.0 is a deep-learning model based on a 3D convolutional neural network trained on time-lapse videos from implanted and non-implanted blastocysts. It is a decision support system for ranking blastocysts without manual input. This retrospective, pre-clinical, external validation included 3604 blastocysts and 808 euploid transfers from 1232 cycles. All blastocysts were retrospectively assessed through the iDAScore v1.0; therefore, it did not influence embryologists’ decision-making process. iDAScore v1.0 was significantly associated with embryo morphology and competence, although AUCs for euploidy and live-birth prediction were 0.60 and 0.66, respectively, which is rather comparable to embryologists’ performance. Nevertheless, iDAScore v1.0 is objective and reproducible, while embryologists’ evaluations are not. In a retrospective simulation, iDAScore v1.0 would have ranked euploid blastocysts as top quality in 63% of cases with one or more euploid and aneuploid blastocysts, and it would have questioned embryologists’ ranking in 48% of cases with two or more euploid blastocysts and one or more live birth. Therefore, iDAScore v1.0 may objectify embryologists’ evaluations, but randomized controlled trials are required to assess its clinical value. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop