Search Results (346)

Introduction: Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs), neck pain (NP), and cervicogenic headache (CGH) frequently co-occur. We aimed to assess TMD prevalence and orofacial clinical features in adults with NP or CGH versus asymptomatic controls. Methods: We searched PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Scopus from inception to 31 July 2025. Eligible designs were analytical cross-sectional studies comparing TMD prevalence, signs, or symptoms between NP/CGH patients and controls. Outcomes included TMD prevalence, jaw mobility, masticatory muscle pressure pain thresholds (PPT), and palpation findings. Risk of bias was appraised with the JBI analytical cross-sectional checklist. Random-effects meta-analyses synthesized odds ratios (ORs) for dichotomous and mean/standardized mean differences (MDs/SMDs) for continuous outcomes; heterogeneity was quantified with I² (and τ² where available). Small-study effects were inspected visually (k < 10). Certainty of evidence was assessed with GRADE. Results: From 4130 records, nine studies met the criteria (eight NP, 400 subjects; one CGH, 44 subjects). NP was associated with higher TMD prevalence versus controls (OR 3.64, 95% CI 1.35–9.84; I² = 13%). Jaw mobility was reduced in either pain-free opening (one study), unassisted opening (one study), or maximum assisted opening (three studies; MD −6.16 mm, 95% CI −10.05; −2.28; I² = 83%). PPTs were lower in symptomatic groups for masseter (SMD −1.11, 95% CI −1.89 to −0.32; three studies; I² = 92.6%) and temporalis (SMD −0.77, 95% CI −1.04 to −0.50; five studies; I² = 69%). Myofascial trigger points and pain on palpation of masticatory muscles or TMJ were more frequent in experimental groups. Discussion: The findings suggest consistent associations between NP/CGH and TMD prevalence with signs of orofacial dysfunctions. Certainty of evidence was very low due to the cross-sectional design, incomplete confounding control, and moderate heterogeneity for several outcomes. Conclusions: Adults with NP/CGH show higher TMD prevalence and reduced jaw mobility with lower masticatory PPTs. The results support integrated assessment, and prospective longitudinal studies are needed. Full article

Background: Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are the most common source of non-dental orofacial pain, with peak prevalence during adolescence and young adulthood—the same age group when orthodontic treatment is typically initiated. Although orthodontics is not a proven cause of TMD, pre-existing dysfunction may be aggravated during treatment, creating clinical and medico-legal risks. Objective: This paper proposes a structured diagnostic questionnaire and scoring framework for pre-orthodontic TMD assessment. The protocol aims to enhance the early recognition of high-risk patients, facilitate interdisciplinary communication, and lay a foundation for systematic validation. Methods: The framework was developed through synthesis of international diagnostic criteria (DC/TMD), a targeted narrative review of the literature, and expert clinical input. Diagnostic categories were selected based on prevalence, impact on orthodontic outcomes, and medico-legal significance. Weighted scoring stratifies patients into three pathways: (1) proceed with orthodontics without concern, (2) proceed with monitoring, or (3) defer orthodontics until TMD is managed. Results: The proposed questionnaire is designed to address inconsistencies in the literature by applying standardized diagnostic items and objective thresholds (e.g., jaw opening < 38 mm) and structured follow-up intervals. Case scenarios illustrate how risk stratification guides decision-making. The questionnaire includes intra-articular and pain-related TMD entities such as disk displacement, degenerative joint disease, myalgia, myofascial pain, arthralgia, headache, and trismus. The framework provides orthodontists with defensible baseline documentation while supporting safe and individualized patient care. Conclusions: Inconsistent diagnostic frameworks, malocclusion classifications, and outcome measures have fragmented the evidence base in orthodontics and TMD. The framework aims to provide orthodontists with structured baseline documentation that may support clinical decision-making and medico-legal risk management. Validation studies are required to establish psychometric reliability and international applicability. Full article

Background and Objectives: Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common cause of chronic pain. In refractory cases, cooled radiofrequency (CRF) of the genicular nerves is indicated. However, recent studies suggest that traditional targets may be insufficient, proposing the inclusion of the recurrent fibular nerve and the infrapatellar branch of the saphenous nerve. This study reports a prospective four-case series evaluating short-term outcomes of CRF at five revised targets in elderly Brazilian patients. Case Report: The study (CAAE No.: 55647722.5.0000.5142) included four patients (three women, one man; mean age 73.8 years) with moderate to severe refractory knee pain underwent diagnostic nerve block followed by ultrasound-guided CRF. After 30 days, three patients reported pain reduction, including two who experienced substantial improvement. One patient maintained severe pain. Improvements in physical performance, knee flexion, and extension were observed in patients who responded clinically, while individuals with coexisting myofascial pain showed limited functional gains. One patient experienced mild transient pruritus. In this prospective case series, CRF applied to five revised targets appeared feasible and well tolerated, with short-term improvement in pain and function in some patients. These preliminary descriptive findings support further investigation in larger controlled studies. Full article

Background: Temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) are increasingly understood within the biopsychosocial framework, which highlights the interplay of biological, psychological, and social factors in their onset and persistence. Within this context, orofacial myofunctional disorders (OMDs) represent a significant biological component, reflecting structural and functional disturbances of the orofacial system that may contribute to temporomandibular dysfunction. Objectives: This pilot study evaluated the effectiveness of orofacial myofunctional therapy (OMT) in improving functional parameters and reducing pain in adults with myogenous TMD accompanied by OMDs. Methods: In this prospective single-arm pilot study, twenty-five adults (aged 25–39 years) with myogenous TMD and coexisting OMDs, diagnosed according to DC/TMD criteria by a dentist trained in DC/TMD assessment and referred for the intervention, completed three biweekly OMT sessions. The therapy comprised myofascial release, oromotor exercises, functional retraining of breathing, chewing, and swallowing, as well as mandibular stabilization and dissociation exercises, complemented by home-based practice. Functional parameters—maximum mouth opening (MAX) and tongue mobility (TRMR-TIP, TRMR-LPS)—were measured before and after each session. Pain intensity (VAS) and quality of life (SF-36) were assessed at baseline and post-intervention. Data were analyzed using the Shapiro–Wilk test, paired t-test, and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Results: Statistically significant improvements (p < 0.001) were observed across all evaluated parameters. Participants demonstrated increased maximum mouth opening and tongue mobility, along with decreased pain intensity and improved quality of life following the intervention. Conclusions: This pilot study provides preliminary evidence that short-term OMT can yield measurable functional improvements and pain reduction in adults with TMD and associated OMDs. These findings underscore the relevance of addressing orofacial myofunctional impairments as part of the biological dimension within the biopsychosocial model and support the integration of OMT into interdisciplinary TMD management. Full article

Background: Foam rolling has become an increasingly popular self-myofascial release (SMR) technique among athletes to prevent injuries, improve recovery, and increase athletic performance. This study investigated how SMR improves mechanical and movement efficiency in recreational road cyclists. Methods: We conducted an exploratory randomized controlled trial (RCT) to investigate the effects of SMR using a foam roller on biomechanical and physiological performance parameters over a six-month period. A total of 32 male participants, aged 26–57 years, with a mean Body Mass Index (BMI) of 24.0 kg/m² (SD = 2.2), were randomly assigned to either an intervention group (n = 16), which incorporated a standardized SMR program into their post-exercise recovery, or a control group (n = 16), which followed the same cycling protocol without SMR. The training program included heart rate-controlled strength endurance intervals. As the primary target, the variables we investigated included torque effectiveness, leg force symmetry, and pedal smoothness. Secondary measurements included submaximal oxygen uptake (VO₂) as well as bioelectrical variables, which we analyzed using classic, repeated-measures ANOVA models and descriptive statistical methods. Results: The analysis revealed significant interaction effects in favor of the intervention group for torque effectiveness (η²_p = 0.434), leg strength symmetry (η²_p = 0.303), and pedal smoothness (η²_p = 0.993). No significant group × time interactions were found for submaximal VO₂ or bioelectrical parameters. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that foam rolling may serve as an effective adjunct to endurance training by enhancing functional neuromuscular performance in cyclists, particularly in torque control and pedal coordination. Its impact on aerobic efficiency and muscle composition appears to be minimal. The results support theoretical models that attribute SMR benefits to proprioceptive, circulatory, and neuromuscular mechanisms rather than structural tissue adaptations. Full article

Myofascial pain (MFP) is one of the most frequent temporomandibular disorders (TMDs), primarily affecting the masseter and temporalis muscles. Various treatment strategies have been developed, including trigger point injections (TrP) and nerve blocks. Among these, the twin block technique has recently emerged as a promising, minimally invasive approach for simultaneously anesthetizing the masseteric and anterior deep temporal nerves through a single extraoral injection. This review presents the anatomical considerations essential for the application of the twin block technique. The course, branching patterns, and relationships of the masseteric and deep temporal nerves with adjacent vascular structures are described based on the current anatomical literature. A comparison is also made of isolated nerve blocks and the twin block, highlighting procedural protocols, clinical advantages, and safety profiles. The anatomical proximity between the masseteric and deep temporal nerves supports the rationale for a single-puncture approach, which can effectively reduce muscle tone, inhibit nociceptive input, and silence multiple trigger points simultaneously. In addition to its therapeutic benefits, the twin block can serve as a diagnostic tool to differentiate muscular from joint or odontogenic pain. In conclusion, the twin block technique offers a precise and efficient method for managing masticatory myofascial pain, provided that detailed anatomical knowledge is applied to ensure procedural accuracy, a low incidence of adverse effects, and patient safety. Full article

The biomechanical characteristics of the erector spinae muscles are crucial for evaluating treatment effectiveness. Although it is widely believed that myofascial release directly impacts muscle biomechanics, there has been limited research directly comparing manual (MMR) and tool-assisted (TMR) applications. This study aimed to fill this gap by investigating the immediate biomechanical effects of MMR and TMR on the erector spinae muscles, using the MyotonPRO device to measure and compare changes in muscle tone, stiffness, and elasticity. Thirty healthy adult physical therapy students (21.19 ± 1.93 years) were recruited and randomly assigned to either the MMR or TMR group. Biomechanical properties (elasticity, tone, and stiffness) were measured before and immediately after three sets of 15 repetitions of the assigned intervention. Post-intervention, the MMR group showed a significant decrease in muscle stiffness and tone (p < 0.0125), while the TMR group showed no significant changes in any of the measured parameters (all p > 0.05). A comparison of the percentage change from baseline also revealed significant differences in elasticity, stiffness, and tone between the two groups (p < 0.0125). This study demonstrates that MMR produces a significant and immediate reduction in erector spinae muscle stiffness and tone, an effect not observed with TMR. Full article

Background: Foam Rolling (FR) involves applying intense pressure to soft tissues, which can cause discomfort or pain due to the mechanical stimulation. This study aims to explore the relationship between individuals’ attitudes toward pain and the changes in the biomechanical properties of myofascial tissues induced by FR, as measured using myotonometry. Understanding this relationship may be valuable for optimizing recovery and performance in both recreational and athletic settings. Methods: Thirty-two healthy men (mean age: 24.3 ± 4.56 years) were randomly assigned to one of two groups: ROL30 (30 s of FR) and ROL120 (120 s of FR). The MyotonPRO device was used to evaluate changes in biomechanical parameters: stiffness, frequency, logarithmic decrement, relaxation time, and creep, before and after FR. Measurements were taken from the gastrocnemius, biceps femoris, erector spinae, and longissimus colli muscles. Data were analyzed for each muscle and as a combined sum across both sides of the body. Psychological factors were assessed using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and the Survey of Pain Attitudes (SOPA), analyzing both total and subscale scores. Correlations between PCS/SOPA scores and changes in myotonometric parameters were calculated using Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Results: In the ROL30 group, 11 significant correlations were found between myotonometric changes and PCS/SOPA scores (r ranging from −0.55 to −0.76 and from 0.54 to 0.77), with the most prominent correlation observed between the sum of decrement and PCS total score (r = −0.55). In the ROL120 group, 3 significant correlations were identified (r ranging from −0.60 to −0.62), including a notable one between the sum of decrement and PCS helplessness (r = −0.60). Conclusions: Attitudes toward pain appear to show associations with certain outcomes of foam rolling. These findings suggest that individual pain perceptions may be related to the applied force during FR and, consequently, the treatment’s effectiveness. Assessing pain-related attitudes beforehand could help personalize FR interventions, particularly in athletes and active individuals, where pain is a routine aspect of training. Identifying negative pain attitudes may also improve pain management and enhance FR effectiveness, though further research is needed. Future studies should include larger sample sizes and validated scales to better understand the role of pain attitudes and their potential causal influence on FR outcomes. Full article

Background: Instrument-assisted soft-tissue mobilization (IASTM) is a popular intervention used for myofascial treatment. Healthcare professionals using IASTM must consider precautions and contraindications prior to administering the intervention. A recent international Delphi survey of IASTM experts recommended a list of 39 conditions to be considered as precautions and contraindications. The clinical relevance of these recommendations among healthcare professionals is of interest. The purpose of the survey was to explore healthcare professionals’ agreement regarding the IASTM Delphi recommendations for precautions and contraindications. Methods: A 16-question electronic survey was emailed to members of the Academy of Orthopedic Physical Therapy, American Academy of Sports Physical Therapy, National Athletic Trainers Association, and members of private physical therapy and athletic training Facebook^® and LinkedIn™ groups. Survey inclusion criteria included being a healthcare professional who has clinical experience using IASTM with patients. The strength of agreement grade scale was used to explore professionals’ opinions and agreement with the expert recommendations. Results: Four hundred and forty-five professionals (men = 52%; women = 46%; other = 2%) (mean age = 49 ± 12.33 years old) completed the survey. Most respondents (mean = 62%) agreed with 12 of 39 recommended conditions across the strength of agreement grade categories. The conditions included five precautions, four contraindications, and three conditions that could be both. Respondents also listed 32 other conditions they felt were relevant. Discussion: These survey results illustrate diversity among professionals’ agreement with expert recommendations. This may be explained by variations in clinical practice patterns and gaps in the research on this topic. The IASTM Delphi study’s recommended list of precautions and contraindications provides valuable information but is not all-inclusive, as other conditions may exist for different patients. When exploring understudied topics, researchers may want to begin with a Delphi study to establish expert recommendations, followed by an assessment of their clinical relevance through related survey studies of healthcare professionals’ agreement on the topic. Conclusions: This exploratory survey introduced a novel method of assessing the clinical relevance of a Delphi study on IASTM precautions and contraindications among healthcare professionals. Full article

Background: Latent myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) are clinically relevant because they lower local pressure pain thresholds (PPTs), can perturb motor control, and may sustain shoulder symptoms even when overt pain is absent. However, even if previous studies assessed stiffness and mechanosensitivity differences between MTrPs and asymptomatic regions, objective patient-level cut-offs and diagnostic-accuracy metrics to distinguish latent MTrPs from adjacent asymptomatic tissue are lacking. Objective: To quantify the diagnostic accuracy of pressure algometry (PPT) and shear-wave elastography (SWE) for distinguishing latent MTrPs from adjacent asymptomatic tissue. Methods: A single-center cross-sectional study was conducted including 76 volunteers with ≥1 latent infraspinatus MTrP (assessed by following the current Delphi consensus criteria). The most sensitive latent MTrP and a control site 2 cm cranial was measured on the dominant side infraspinatus muscle in each participant. PPT and SWE were acquired with a standardized protocol (long-axis imaging, anisotropy control, minimal probe pressure; three captures per site; 1 cm rectangular ROI; operator blinded to site type). ROC analyses estimated areas under the curve (AUCs), Youden-optimal cut-offs, sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios (LR+/−). Results: Latent MTrPs showed lower PPTs than controls (p < 0.001) and higher stiffness (shear modulus: p = 0.009; shear-wave speed: p = 0.022). PPT yielded AUC = 0.704 with an optimal cut-off of 47.5 N (sensitivity 0.75; specificity 0.592; LR+ 1.84; LR− 0.42), outperforming SWE metrics (shear modulus AUC 0.611; cut-off 23.6 kPa; sensitivity 0.632; specificity 0.605; LR+ 1.60; LR− 0.61; shear-wave speed AUC 0.601; cut-off 2.55 m/s; sensitivity 0.592; specificity 0.632; LR+ 1.61; LR− 0.65). Conclusions: In the infraspinatus, PPT provides moderate discrimination between latent MTrPs and adjacent asymptomatic tissue, whereas resting SWE—despite small mean differences—exhibited lower accuracy. These findings support mechanosensitivity as a primary measurable signal and position SWE as an adjunct. External validation across devices and operators, and multivariable models integrating sensory, imaging, and clinical features, are warranted. Full article

Background and Objective: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease affecting synovial joints including the temporomandibular joint (TMJ). This study aimed to assess the prevalence and characteristics of temporomandibular disorders (TMDs) in RA patients and correlate these findings with disease activity markers. Materials and Methods: This cross-sectional study included 40 RA patients meeting the 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria and 40 healthy subjects (HSs). Research diagnostic criteria for TMD were used to assess TMD. RA severity was evaluated using ESR, CRP, rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-CCP antibodies, Disease Activity Score (DAS) 28, and disease duration. Results: TMD prevalence was significantly higher in RA patients (75%) than in HS. Orofacial pain was a predominant TMD reported in 82.5% of RA patients. In RA patients there was a difference in myofascial pain, TMJ pain, and TMJ sounds in comparison to HS. All masticatory muscles were painful on palpation in RA patients and the pain intensity was higher in RA than in HS. The most painful muscles were the medial pterygoid muscles, the anterior belly of digastric muscle, and the tendon of the temporal muscle. Slight crepitations were the most frequent. Maximal active mouth opening was reduced and negatively correlated with CRP levels. The most frequent jaw function limitations were chewing and yawning difficulties and tinnitus. There were no correlations between TMD and DAS, RF, and disease duration. Conclusions: Active inflammation in RA is a crucial factor reducing mouth opening. TMD screening independent of disease duration should be integrated into RA management protocols, particularly for patients with elevated inflammatory markers, to eliminate other pathological factors contributing to faster TMJ functional changes, TMJ involvement, and the severity of TMD during RA course. Full article

Background and Objectives: Research examining the difference between the effects of deep and superficial dry needling on myofascial trigger points (MTrPs) in the upper trapezius muscle is limited. Thus, this systematic review was conducted to compare the effects of these two dry needling techniques on pain and functional disability in adults with neck pain who demonstrated MTrPs. Materials and Methods: Randomised clinical trials (RCTs) were identified through an electronic search in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, Google Scholar, Dimensions and OpenAlex from inception until 22 September 2024. Only English-language studies were considered. Best-evidence synthesis was utilised to interpret the results of the included RCTs. Results: Of the 192 records obtained, 8 RCTs were included (2 with a low risk of bias, 4 with some risk-of-bias concerns and 2 with a high risk of bias). Overall, both deep and superficial dry needling provided short-term alleviation of pain and functional disability. No clinically meaningful differences were found between the two dry needling techniques. Conclusions: Deep and superficial dry needling seem to have similar positive effects on pain and functional disability in patients with neck pain exhibiting MTrPs. Full article

Objectives: To compare the acute effects of upper cervical manipulation (CM) and manual massage (MM) to simulated CM (Sham) and Control conditions (Control) on heart rate variability (HRV) and blood pressure (BP) responses in women with non-elevated BP. Methods: A single-blind, four-arm, parallel-group, randomized, crossover, placebo-controlled trial recruited 15 apparently healthy women with non-elevated BP who visited the lab on four occasions with 48 h intervals to ensure adequate washout between interventions. A Latin square randomization approach was employed to assign participants to one of four experimental conditions: (1) Control: Rest without intervention; (2) CM: Bilateral high-velocity, low-amplitude manipulation of the upper cervical spine (C0–C2); (3) MM: A single 120 s session of MM release applied unilaterally to the anterior and posterior thigh, posterior lower leg, and lumbar musculature; or (4) Sham: Mimicking the positioning used in CM without the application of thrust manipulation. In each experiment, HRV, systolic and diastolic BP were measured at rest (Baseline) and every 15 min for 60 min after each intervention. All procedures were performed in the morning to avoid any confounding circadian rhythm effect on HRV and BP. Results: We found significant increases within conditions for RMSSDms (Control: Post-0 (p = 0.032), Post-15 (p = 0.023); Sham: Post-15 (p = 0.014); CM: Post-15 (p = 0.027)); SDNNms (Control: Post-45 (p = 0.037); CM: Post-45 (p = 0.014) and Post-60 (p = 0.019)); PNN50% (CM: Post-0 (p = 0.044), Post-15 (p = 0.044) and Post-45 (p = 0.019)); LF Power (ms2) (CM: Post-60 (p = 0.001)), and LF/HF ratio (MM: Post-60 (p = 0.022). Conclusions: Although no statistically significant between-condition differences were detected, within-condition changes with moderate-to-large effect sizes suggest potential clinical relevance of CM and MM. These preliminary findings emphasize the importance of effect sizes and may indicate greater translational significance in populations with non-elevated cardiovascular risk. Full article

Background: Primary dysmenorrhea (PD) is a common gynecological condition among women of reproductive age, often leading to pain and functional limitations. Myofascial release (MFR) has been suggested as a potential non-pharmacological intervention. This study aimed to investigate the immediate effects of a single MFR session on pain intensity, menstrual symptoms, and uterine artery hemodynamics in women with PD. Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 34 women with PD were randomly assigned to either the MFR group (n = 18) or the placebo MFR group (n = 16). All participants received 10 min of thermotherapy followed by 30 min of either MFR or placebo MFR. Pain intensity (NRS), pressure pain thresholds (PPT) at myofascial trigger points, menstrual symptoms (MDQ-T), and uterine artery pulsatility index (PI) and resistance index (RI) were assessed at three time points: baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 3 h post-intervention. Results: Both groups demonstrated significant within-group reductions in pain intensity and menstrual symptoms post-intervention (p < 0.01), with no significant group-by-time interaction. However, significant interaction effects were observed for the PI and RI of the right uterine artery, showing greater reductions in the MFR group compared to the placebo group at 3 h post-intervention (p < 0.05). Conclusions: A single MFR session resulted in improvements in uterine hemodynamics, suggesting autonomic modulation as a potential mechanism. Although subjective symptom improvements were observed in both groups, only MFR showed objective vascular benefits. These findings support the physiological plausibility of MFR in PD management and suggest its potential application as a personalized, non-pharmacological intervention. Further studies are warranted to explore its long-term and individualized therapeutic effects. Full article

Background: Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy (ESWT) for targeting myofascial tissues is gaining increasing interest for the treatment of musculoskeletal disorders. This review evaluates the mechanisms, applications, and effectiveness of ESWT in managing myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) while identifying methodological gaps in existing research. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, PEDro, and Cochrane Central Library was conducted up to August 2025, focusing on studies from existing meta-analyses, particularly randomized controlled trials. Eligible studies were selected based on predefined criteria, including the use of ESWT for MPS treatment, methodological rigor, and adherence to standardized protocols. Data were extracted on diagnostic criteria for MPS and myofascial trigger points (MTrPs), shockwave application parameters, adherence to International Society for Medical Shockwave Treatment (ISMST) guidelines, follow-up periods, and treatment efficacy. Results: significant inconsistencies were identified in MPS diagnosis, shockwave application technique, and study follow-up periods. Many studies did not adhere to ISMST guidelines, with variations in energy levels, impulses, and differentiation between radial pressure wave (RPW) and focused ESWT (fESWT). One-third of the studies had follow-up periods of two weeks or less, limiting the assessment of long-term outcomes. Despite these limitations, ESWT demonstrated moderate to good efficacy compared with controls. Conclusions: While ESWT appears effective for MPS, methodological inconsistencies prevent definitive conclusions. Future research should standardize protocols, differentiate RPW from fESWT, and include longer follow-up periods to optimize therapeutic potential and validate ESWT as a treatment for MPS. Full article