Search Results (50)

Background: Radiation dose escalation for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) using stereotactic magnetic resonance (MR)-guided online adaptive radiation therapy (SMART) or computed tomography (CT)-guided moderately hypofractionated ablative radiation therapy (HART) can achieve favorable outcomes although have not previously been compared. Methods: We performed a multi-center retrospective analysis of SMART (50 Gy/5 fractions) vs. HART (75 Gy/25 fractions or 67.5 Gy/15 fractions with concurrent capecitabine) for LAPC. Gray’s test and Cox proportional regression analyses were performed to identify factors associated with local failure (LF) and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 211 patients (SMART, n = 91; HART, n = 120) were evaluated, and none had surgery. Median follow-up after SMART and HART was 27.0 and 40.0 months, respectively (p < 0.0002). SMART achieved higher gross tumor volume (GTV) coverage and greater hotspots. Two-year LF after SMART and HART was 6.5% and 32.9% (p < 0.001), while two-year OS was 31.0% vs. 35.3% (p = 0.056), respectively. LF was associated with SMART vs. HART (HR 5.389, 95% CI: 1.298–21.975; p = 0.021) and induction mFOLFIRINOX vs. non-mFOLFIRINOX (HR 2.067, 95% CI 1.038–4.052; p = 0.047), while OS was associated with CA19-9 decrease > 40% (HR 0.725, 95% CI 0.515–0.996; p = 0.046) and GTV V120% (HR 1.022, 95% CI 1.006–1.037; p = 0.015). Acute grade > 3 toxicity was similar (3.3% vs. 5.8%; p = 0.390), while late grade > 3 toxicity was less common after SMART (2.2% vs. 9.2%; p = 0.037). Conclusions: Ablative SMART and HART both achieve favorable oncologic outcomes for LAPC with minimal toxicity. We did not observe an OS difference, although technical advantages of SMART might improve target coverage and reduce LF. Full article

Background/Objectives: Treatment of borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced (LAPC) pancreatic cancer involves neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by complex surgery, posing significant risks of toxicity, complications, and changes in quality of life (QoL). This study aims to investigate the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by resection on overall survival (OS) and QoL. Methods: Consecutive patients with BRPC and LAPC included in a population-based study (NORPACT-2) from January 2018 to December 2020 were reviewed. Results: A total of 54 patients (BRPC; n = 43, LAPC; n = 11) underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by pancreatectomy. The majority (66.7%) received (m)FOLFIRINOX. Forty-six (85.2%) patients underwent pancreatoduodenectomy. Vascular resection was performed in 32 (59.3%) patients. Fourteen (25.9%) patients experienced major complications. The majority of the resected specimens demonstrated T2 (63%), N+ (79.6%), and R1 (85.2%) status. Median OS was 31 (CI 24.7–37.3) months. In multivariate analysis, only CAP 3 (p = 0.035) predicted worse survival. Forty (74.1%) patients experienced recurrence. Global QoL (p = 0.031), social and role functioning (p = 0.024, p = 0.031), improved three months after surgery. Pain (p = 0.042), dyspnea (p = 0.004), appetite loss (p = 0.028), and diarrhea (p = 0.007) improved post-resection. Conclusions: Patients with BRPC and LAPC undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection have survival comparable to primary resectable pancreatic cancer. Postoperative morbidity was acceptable, and QoL recovered post-surgery. CAP grade was the only independent negative prognostic factor. Full article

Purpose: To investigate if radiomics signatures generated from longitudinal CT scans could predict IRE treatment effectiveness and outcomes in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Methods: A cohort of 50 (60% male, mean [SD] age 60.7 [8.7] years) LAPC patients treated with IRE were retrospectively selected. Preoperative and 12-week follow-up CT scans were reviewed by two radiologists for tumor segmentation. A total of 2078 features were extracted: shape (n = 16), texture (n = 68), filter (n = 1892), intensity (n = 18), and local texture (n = 84). Principal component analysis (PCA) was applied to develop composite radiomics features. Composite signatures and clinically relevant radiomics features were correlated with time to recurrence (TTR), time to local recurrence (TTLR), time to distant recurrence (TTDR), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Risk stratification performance was evaluated using hazard ratios (HRs), and significance was evaluated using the log-rank test. Results: Statistically significant separation between high and low patient TTR risk groups was observed in the following: gray-level co-occurrence matrix (HR = 2.65, p < 0.01, median survival difference = 6.6 mo); composite radiomics features derived from the following feature groups: all radiomics features (HR = 2.27, p = 0.01, median survival difference = 6.4 mo), intensity features (HR = 3.13, p < 0.01, median survival difference = 14.0 mo), and filter features (HR = 2.27, p = 0.01, median survival difference = 6.4 mo). Conclusions: Pre-treatment radiomics signatures were significantly associated with LAPC patient outcomes. The observed correlations used pre-treatment CT scans, implying that the features predict the individual risk of disease recurrence. Full article

Background/Objectives: Non-ablative stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is commonly employed for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) using computed tomography-guided radiotherapy (CTgRT) without online adaptive radiation therapy (oART). The safe delivery of ablative SBRT has been demonstrated using stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided online adaptive radiation therapy (SMART). We performed an in silico comparison of non-adapted CTgRT versus SMART to better understand the potential benefit of oART for ablative pancreatic SBRT. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated original and daily adapted SMART plans that were previously delivered for 20 consecutive LAPC cases (120 total plans across all patients) treated on a 0.35 T MR-linac prescribed to 50 Gy (gross disease) and 33 Gy (elective sites) simultaneously in five fractions. Six comparative CTgRT plans for each patient (one original, five daily treatment) were retrospectively generated with the same prescribed dose and planning parameters as the SMART plans assuming no oART availability. The impact of daily anatomic changes on CTgRT and SMART plans without oART was evaluated across each treatment day MRI scan acquired for SMART. Results: Ninety percent of cases involved the pancreatic head. No statistically significant differences were seen between CTgRT and SMART with respect to target coverage. Nearly all (96%) fractions planned on either CT or MRI platforms exceeded at least one GI organ at risk (OAR) constraint without oART. Significant differences favoring SMART over non-adaptive CTgRT were observed for the duodenum V35 Gy ≤ 0.5 cc (34.2 vs. 41.9 Gy, p = 0.0035) and duodenum V40 Gy ≤ 0.03 cc (37 vs. 52.5 Gy, p = 0.0006) constraints. Stomach V40 Gy trended towards significance favoring SMART (37 vs. 40.3 Gy, p = 0.057) while no significant differences were seen. Conclusions: This is the first study that quantifies the frequency and extent of GI OAR constraint violations that would occur during ablative five-fraction SBRT using SMART vs. CTgRT. GI OAR constraint violations are expected for most fractions without oART whereas all constraints can be achieved with oART. As such, these data suggest that oART should be required for ablative five-fraction pancreatic SBRT. Full article

Background/Objectives: Pancreatic cancer remains one of the most aggressive and lethal malignancies, with limited effective treatment options for advanced stages. Microwave Ablation (MWA) has emerged as a minimally invasive therapeutic modality, offering potential benefits in tumor control. This review aims to critically assess the safety and efficacy of MWA in the treatment of pancreatic cancer, focusing on its application in various pancreatic lesions. Methods: We systematically reviewed studies published between 2010 and 2023 that evaluated the use of MWA in pancreatic tumors, including locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs), and pancreatic metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Due to limited data on survival rates and long-term outcomes, our analysis concentrated primarily on the technical aspects and immediate procedural outcomes of MWA. Results: MWA was technically feasible in all cases. The overall complication rate was approximately 16.7% (nine patients), with higher incidences in tumors located in the pancreatic head. Reported complications included pancreatitis and pseudocyst formation. Procedural parameters varied, with applied energy ranging from 20 to 80 watts and ablation times between 2 to 15 min, depending on the microwave generator type and approach (percutaneous, intraoperative or endoscopic). All cases demonstrated effective necrosis of the target tissue, and several studies reported notable tumor size reductions, averaging up to 70%. Conclusions: MWA shows promise as a therapeutic option for pancreatic cancer, achieving high technical success rates and significant tumor reductions. However, the procedure is associated with a moderate complication rate, particularly in tumors located in the pancreatic head. Full article

Background/Objectives: Pancreatic cancer is a very aggressive disease with a poor prognosis, even when diagnosed at an early stage. This study aimed to validate and refine a radiomic-based [¹⁸F]FDG-PET model to predict distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) in patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Methods: A Cox regression model incorporating two radiomic features (RFs) and cancer stage (III vs. IV) was temporally validated using a larger cohort (215 patients treated between 2005–2022). Patients received concurrent chemoradiotherapy with capecitabine and hypo-fractionated Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT). Data were split into training (145 patients, 2005–2017) and validation (70 patients, 2017–2022) groups. Seventy-eight RFs were extracted, harmonized, and analyzed using machine learning to develop refined models. Results: The model incorporating Statistical-Percentile10, Morphological-ComShift, and stage demonstrated moderate predictive accuracy (training: C-index = 0.632; validation: C-index = 0.590). When simplified to include only Statistical-Percentile10, performance improved slightly in the validation group (C-index = 0.601). Adding GLSZM3D-grayLevelVariance to Statistical-Percentile10, while excluding Morphological-ComShift, further enhanced accuracy (training: C-index = 0.654; validation: C-index = 0.623). Despite these refinements, all versions showed similar moderate ability to stratify patients into risk classes. Conclusions: [¹⁸F]FDG-PET radiomic features are robust predictors of DRFS after chemoradiotherapy in LAPC. Despite moderate performance, these models hold promise for patient risk stratification. Further validation with external cohorts is ongoing. Full article

Objective: We demonstrated for the first time the safety and feasibility of escalating up to 55 Gy/11 Gy/fr/5fr in borderline (BRPC)/unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), using the standard LINAC platform. The aim of the present study is to assess for the first time the impact of this high-dose neoadjuvant stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABRT) protocol on tumor resectability and pathological responses. Materials/Methods: From June 2017 to December 2022, patients with BRPC/LAPC were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ChT) and SABRT-escalated doses of SIB at 45 Gy, 50 Gy, and up to 55 Gy (BED ≥ 100). Radiological evaluation was conducted with a CT scan 6-8 weeks post-treatment to determine resectability status based on established criteria (SAR/APA2014). Surgical decisions were made by the multidisciplinary tumor board of the participating institutions. Pathological assessments post-surgery used criteria from the College of American Pathologists (CAP), categorizing resection status as R0 (negative margins), R1 (microscopic tumor margins), and R2 (macroscopic tumor margins). Tumor response was evaluated with the Tumor Response Scoring (TRS) system, as G0 (no viable cancer cells), G1 (single cells or rare small groups), G2 (residual cancer with evident regression), and G3 (extensive residual cancer). Results: Thirty-three patients (p) were included: 39.4% (13p) BRPC/60.6% (20p) LAPC. After ChT-SABRT, 45.5% (15p) were considered resectable, with 11/13 (84.6%) BRPC and 4/20 (20%) LAPC (p < 0.0001). One patient refused surgery and other patient died of COVID sepsis. Two more patients had disseminated disease at surgery. Among the 11 patients who underwent full surgery, all patients achieved either clean margins R0: 72.7% (8p) or microscopic affected margins R1: 27.3% (3p). TRS scores were G1: 27.3% (3p), G2: 54.5% (6p), and G3: 18.2% (2p). The present follow-up (FUP) was closed on 1 November 2024 (23.55 months, range: 6–71 months). The mean freedom from local progression as the first cause of disease failure was 43.30 ± 3.09 (37.23–49.38), and the median was not reached. The actuarial 1- and 2-year rates for freedom from local relapse as a first cause of disease failure were 92.3% (87.7–93.3%) and 79.7% (79.7–87.7%), respectively. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant ChT-SABRT in LAPC improves resectability rates and induces relevant tumor regression. These promising findings should be validated by larger sample sizes and extended follow-up. Full article

Background/Objectives: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the deadliest cancers. Surgical resection is the most reliable chance for cure, but high rates of positive margins and local failure persist. Neoadjuvant therapies (NAT), including chemotherapy and radiation therapy (RT), are being explored to improve surgical outcomes, particularly in borderline resectable (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). This review aims to summarize the current landscape and future directions for neoadjuvant RT (NART) in PDAC. Methods: The review includes a detailed analysis of past and ongoing clinical trials investigating various NART approaches in PDAC, with an emphasis on different RT techniques, fractionation schemes, and their integration into multimodal treatment strategies. Results: Early evidence suggests that NART can improve resection margins and local control. However, recent trials, including the Alliance A021501 and LAP-07 trials, have failed to demonstrate significant survival benefits with the addition of RT to NAT. Nevertheless, nuances in trial design and execution continue to keep the question of NART open. Newer approaches, such as stereotactic magnetic resonance-guided adaptive radiation therapy (SMART), show promise in improving local control and survival, but further phase 3 trials are needed. Conclusions: While NART has shown potential in improving local control in PDAC, its impact on overall survival remains unclear. Ongoing trials, particularly those utilizing advanced techniques like SMART, are critical in defining the role of RT in the neoadjuvant setting for PDAC. Collaboration across multidisciplinary teams is essential to optimize treatment strategies and trial outcomes. Full article

Background: Poor intra-tumoural vascularity contributes to a lack of response to chemotherapy in pancreatic cancers. Preliminary data suggest that the addition of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided intra-tumoural injection of phosphorus-32 (³²P) microparticles to standard chemotherapy is potentially beneficial in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). We aimed to assess changes in pancreatic tumour vascularity following ³²P implantation, using contrast-enhanced EUS (CE-EUS). Methods: This was a prospective single-centre trial from January 2022 to 2024 of patients with unresectable, non-metastatic LAPC undergoing standard FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy and ³²P implantation. We performed CE-EUS pre-implantation after two chemotherapy cycles and 4 and 12 weeks after implantation. Time–intensity curves were analysed for 90 s after IV contrast bolus to ascertain peak intensity and intensity gain. Results: A total of 20 patients underwent ³²P implantation, with 15 completing 12-week follow-up. The technical success of ³²P implantation was 100%. The median primary tumour size reduced from 32 mm (IQR 27.5–38.75) pre-implantation to 24 mm (IQR 16–26) 12 weeks post-implantation (p < 0.001). Five patients (25%) had tumour downstaging, and four underwent resections. The baseline (pre-implantation, post-chemotherapy) median intensity gain of contrast enhancement within the tumour was 32.15 (IQR 18.08–54.35). This increased to 46.85 (IQR 35.05–76.6; p = 0.007) and 66.3 (IQR 54.7–76.3; p = 0.001) at 4 weeks and 12 weeks post-implantation, respectively. Over a median follow-up of 11.2 months (IQR 7.8–12.8), 15/20 (75%) of patients remained alive, with 3/20 (15%) demonstrating local disease progression. Overall survival was not significantly different between patients with or without an increased intensity of 10 a.u. or more at 12 weeks post-implantation. Conclusion: This is the first clinical study to demonstrate treatment-induced increased vascularity within pancreatic primary tumours, which followed ³²P implantation and FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy. Larger comparative trials are warranted. Full article

Background: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-recommended treatment for patients with borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) involves a combination of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy and the curative surgical resection of the tumor. This study seeks to identify the clinical, radiological, laboratory, and pathologic predictors that can anticipate the oncological outcomes of patients. Methods: In this study, we conducted a retrospective analysis of patients who had undergone curative surgical resection for BRPC, LAPC, or resectable disease with high-risk features after receiving neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX at two institutions. We evaluated by means of multivariate analysis whether clinical and laboratory response, tumor markers, radiological response, and pathologic tumor response grade correlated with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: The study enrolled a total of 70 patients with BRPC, LAPC, and resectable disease with high-risk features who underwent resection after neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX. Age above 65 years and fewer than nine cycles of chemotherapy (OR 4.2; 95% CI 1.4–12.0; p-value 0.007); locally advanced tumors after neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) (OR 7.0; 95% CI 1.9–25.7; p-value 0.003); and lymph node disease and histological tumor regression grade 2 and 3 (OR 4.3; 95% CI 0.9–19.2; p-value 0.05) were risk factors linked to adverse OS and DFS. The median OS and DFS were 33 (22–43.9) months and 16.5 (11.3–21.6) months, respectively. Conclusions: Classification as a LA tumor after NAT was the only preoperative radiological factor that predicted adverse survival in patients undergoing curative surgery after NAT. Other clinical, biochemical, and radiological measures of response were not found to predict OS. Patient age, the cumulative administration of more than eight cycles of chemotherapy, and a significant pathological response were associated with better OS. The results of this study are important for treatment decision-making and prognostication in patients with BRPC and LAPC. Full article

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) poses a significant challenge in oncology due to its advanced stage upon diagnosis and limited treatment options. Surgical resection, the primary curative approach, often results in poor long-term survival rates, leading to the exploration of alternative strategies like neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) and total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT). While NAT aims to enhance resectability and overall survival, there appears to be potential for improvement, prompting consideration of alternative neoadjuvant strategies integrating full-dose chemotherapy (CT) and radiotherapy (RT) in TNT approaches. TNT integrates chemotherapy and radiotherapy prior to surgery, potentially improving margin-negative resection rates and enabling curative resection for locally advanced cases. The lingering question: is more always better? This article categorizes TNT strategies into six main groups based on radiotherapy (RT) techniques: (1) conventional chemoradiotherapy (CRT), (2) the Dutch PREOPANC approach, (3) hypofractionated ablative intensity-modulated radiotherapy (HFA-IMRT), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) techniques, which further divide into (4) non-ablative SBRT, (5) nearly ablative SBRT, and (6) adaptive ablative SBRT. A comprehensive analysis of the literature on TNT is provided for both borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC), with detailed sections for each. Full article

Introduction: Locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAPC) has a dismal prognosis, with intratumoral therapies showing limited benefits. We assume that the dense stroma within these tumors hampers drug dispersion. Aim: This study explores the efficacy of multisite intratumoral injections in improving a drug’s distribution while minimizing its side effects. Methods and Results: In mice with orthotopic LAPC tumors, weekly intratumoral injections of oxaliplatin at four separate sites reduced the tumor growth by 46% compared with saline (p < 0.003). Oxaliplatin exhibited the greatest impact on the tumor microenvironment relative to gemcitabine, Abraxane, or their combination, with increased necrosis, apoptosis, fibroblasts, inflammation, and infiltrating lymphocytes (p < 0.008). When combined with intravenous FOLFIRINOX (FFX), multisite intratumoral oxaliplatin reduced the tumor weight by 35% compared with single-site injection (p = 0.007). No additional visible toxicity was observed even at a 10-fold occurrence of intratumoral treatment. This co-modality treatment significantly improved survival compared with other groups (p = 0.007). Conclusions: Multisite intratumoral therapy in tandem with systemic treatment holds promise for reducing the tumor size and enhancing the overall survival in LAPC. Full article

Pancreatic cancer is a lethal disease, with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) having a dismal prognosis. For patients with LAPC, gemcitabine-based regimens, with or without radiation, have long been the standard of care. Irreversible electroporation (IRE), a non-thermal ablative technique, may potentially prolong the survival of patients with LAPC. In this article, the authors present a case of LAPC of the uncinate process (biopsy proven pancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma) with duodenal invasion. The patient had a combination of chemotherapy and radiation therapy but was found to have stable disease. He then underwent intra-operative IRE with cholecystectomy, Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy and hepaticojejunostomy. He subsequently underwent percutaneous IRE 13 months post open IRE. The patient also completed peptide receptor radionuclide therapy and has been started on Lanreotide. Following combination therapy, the pancreatic tumor showed significant reduction in size, with patient survival at 53 months post-diagnosis at the time of writing. Full article

Aim: The gold standard of care for pancreatic adenocarcinoma is the integrated treatment of surgery and chemotherapy (ChT), but about 50% of patients present with unresectable disease. Our study evaluated the efficacy in terms of local control, survival and safety of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) in locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). Methods: A retrospective study (STEP study) analyzed patients with LAPC treated with a dose of 45 Gy in 6 fractions. Local control (LC), distant progression free survival (DPFS), overall survival (OS) and toxicity were analyzed according to the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 142 patients were evaluated. Seventy-six patients (53.5%) received induction ChT before SBRT. The median follow-up was 11 months. One-, 2- and 3-year LC rate was 81.9%, 69.1% and 58.5%. Median DPFS was 6.03 months; 1- and 2-year DPFS rate was 19.9% and 4.5%. Median OS was 11.6 months and 1-, 2- and 3-year OS rates were 45.4%, 16.1%, and 9.8%. At univariate analysis, performed by the log-rank test, age < 70 years (p = 0.037), pre-SBRT ChT (p = 0.004) and post-SBRT ChT (p = 0.019) were associated with better OS. No patients experienced G3 toxicity. Conclusion: SBRT represents an effective and safe therapeutic option in the multimodal treatment of patients with LAPC in terms of increased LC. When SBRT was sequentially integrated with ChT, the treatment proved to be promising in terms of OS as well. Full article

Different options for locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) are available based on international guidelines: chemotherapy (CHT), chemoradiation (CRT), and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). However, the role of radiotherapy is debated in LAPC. We retrospectively compared CHT, CRT, and SBRT ± CHT in a real-world setting in terms of overall survival (OS), local control (LC), and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS). LAPC patients from a multicentric retrospective database were included (2005–2018). Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Multivariable Cox analysis was performed to identify predictors of LC, OS, and DMFS. Of the 419 patients included, 71.1% were treated with CRT, 15.5% with CHT, and 13.4% with SBRT. Multivariable analysis showed higher LC rates for CRT (HR: 0.56, _95%CI 0.34–0.92, p = 0.022) or SBRT (HR: 0.27, _95%CI 0.13–0.54, p < 0.001), compared to CHT. CRT (HR: 0.44, _95%CI 0.28–0.70, p < 0.001) and SBRT (HR: 0.40, _95%CI 0.22–0.74, p = 0.003) were predictors of prolonged OS with respect to CHT. No significant differences were recorded in terms of DMFS. In selected patients, the addition of radiotherapy to CHT is still an option to be considered. In patients referred for radiotherapy, CRT can be replaced by SBRT considering its duration, higher LC rate, and OS rate, which are at least comparable to that of CRT. Full article