Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (12)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
13 pages, 633 KiB  
Article
Robotic Versus Hand-Assisted Distal Pancreatectomy: A Comparative Single Center Retrospective Study
by Nabih Essami, Esther Kazlow, Eitan Dines, Aasem Abu Shtaya, Wisam Assaf, Riad Haddad and Ahmad Mahamid
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(14), 4919; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14144919 - 11 Jul 2025
Viewed by 289
Abstract
Background: While there is an abundance of comparative studies on open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomies (RDPs) available in the literature, direct comparisons between RDP and hand-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (HALDP) are limited. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy [...] Read more.
Background: While there is an abundance of comparative studies on open, laparoscopic, and robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomies (RDPs) available in the literature, direct comparisons between RDP and hand-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (HALDP) are limited. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of RDPs in comparison to HALDPs in the treatment of pancreatic lesions. Methods: This study reviewed 97 patients who underwent distal pancreatectomy at Carmel Medical Center between 2008 and 2024. After excluding 40 patients (24 open and 16 pure laparoscopic resections), the final cohort comprised 57 patients: 20 RDPs and 37 HALDPs. The primary outcomes included peri-operative parameters, while secondary outcomes encompassed 90-day morbidity and mortality. Results: RDPs led to significantly longer operative times (3.9 vs. 2.5 h, p < 0.001) but resulted in shorter hospital stays (4.7 vs. 5.8 days, p = 0.02) and a higher number of harvested lymph nodes (11 vs. 5.4, p = 0.01). While clinically significant pancreatic fistula rates were numerically higher in the RDP group (35% vs. 16.2%, p = 0.18), this difference was not statistically significant. Overall, complication rates were comparable (55% vs. 43.2%, p = 0.39). Severe morbidity (Clavien–Dindo ≥ IIIa) was absent in the RDP group compared to 8% in the HALDP group (p = 0.04). No 90-day mortality was observed in either group. Conclusions: This study indicates that although RDP involves longer operative times, it may provide certain advantages for patients, such as shorter hospital stays, better lymph node retrieval, and a notable decrease in postoperative morbidity when compared to HALDP. Larger prospective studies are needed to validate these results and to determine the most effective surgical approach for distal pancreatectomy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 2465 KiB  
Case Report
Pancreatic Endometriosis Coexisting with a Splenic Mesothelial Cyst: A Rare Case Report and Review of the Literature
by Daniel Paramythiotis, Antonia Syrnioti, Dimitrios Tsavdaris, Aikaterini Smprini, Alexandros Mekras, Athanasios Apostolidis and Angeliki Cheva
Diseases 2025, 13(7), 203; https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases13070203 - 30 Jun 2025
Viewed by 351
Abstract
Endometriosis is a clinical entity affecting up to 10% of women of reproductive age, characterized by ectopic endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity. While extrapelvic endometriosis has been documented, pancreatic endometriosis remains extremely rare and poses significant diagnostic challenges due to its similarity [...] Read more.
Endometriosis is a clinical entity affecting up to 10% of women of reproductive age, characterized by ectopic endometrial tissue outside the uterine cavity. While extrapelvic endometriosis has been documented, pancreatic endometriosis remains extremely rare and poses significant diagnostic challenges due to its similarity to other pancreatic diseases. At the same time, splenic mesothelial cysts are also rare and typically benign. This report presents a unique case of pancreatic endometriosis coexisting with a splenic mesothelial cyst in a 31-year-old woman. The patient presented to the emergency department with complaints of persistent epigastric and low back pain. She noted having similar symptoms approximately a year prior. Her past medical history was otherwise unremarkable, and there was no known family history of pancreatic disease or neoplasms. Initial imaging revealed a 3.8 cm cystic lesion in the pancreatic tail, with features suggestive of mucinous cystadenoma. Following clinical evaluation and confirmation of the cyst’s nature through endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy, the patient subsequently underwent laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy due to worsening symptoms. Gross examination revealed a multilocular pancreatic cyst with a smooth, hemorrhagic wall. Microscopic analysis showed the cyst to be lined by cuboidal to columnar epithelium, consistent with pancreatic endometriosis, confirmed by immunohistochemical staining. The spleen showed cystic formations, diagnosed as a multifaceted mesothelial cyst. In conclusion, this report is the first to document the coexistence of pancreatic endometriosis and splenic mesothelial cysts, highlighting the importance of accurate imaging and pathologic evaluation in the diagnosis of these rare conditions. Early diagnosis and surgical intervention lead to favorable outcomes, reinforcing the importance of comprehensive diagnostic strategies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 474 KiB  
Article
Surgical and Oncological Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Left Pancreatectomy for Pancreatic Cancer: Robotic vs. Laparoscopic Approach
by Matteo De Pastena, Gabriella Lionetto, Salvatore Paiella, Martina Maruccio, Federico Faustini, Elisa Venturini, Antonio Pea, Fabio Casciani, Giuseppe Malleo and Alessandro Esposito
Curr. Oncol. 2025, 32(7), 376; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol32070376 - 28 Jun 2025
Viewed by 383
Abstract
Objective: This study compares the surgical and oncological outcomes of minimally invasive robotic (RLP) and laparoscopic (LLP) left pancreatectomy in pancreatic cancer (PC) patients. Methods: Data from patients who underwent minimally invasive left pancreatectomy between 2013 and 2023 were analyzed. Two groups were [...] Read more.
Objective: This study compares the surgical and oncological outcomes of minimally invasive robotic (RLP) and laparoscopic (LLP) left pancreatectomy in pancreatic cancer (PC) patients. Methods: Data from patients who underwent minimally invasive left pancreatectomy between 2013 and 2023 were analyzed. Two groups were identified: RLP and LLP. Perioperative outcomes were compared, including operative time, blood loss, conversion rate, and postoperative complications. Oncological outcomes included margin status, lymph node retrieval, lymph node status, overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: Fifty-four patients were divided into the LLP (n = 39) and RLP (n = 15) groups. The median operative time was shorter for LLP than RLP [260 min vs. 366 min, p = 0.007]. Blood loss and conversion rates were comparable (p > 0.05). In the LLP group, significantly more lymph nodes were harvested (29 vs. 19, p = 0.05), and a higher percentage of positive lymph nodes was noted (72% vs. 40%, p = 0.033). No significant difference was found in the R0 resection status (82% vs. 73%, p = 0.358). After a median follow-up of 26 months, OS (23 months vs. 34 months, p = 0.812) and DFS (17 months vs. 16 months, p = 0.635) were similar. Conclusion: RLP provides outcomes identical to LLP in treating body–tail pancreatic cancer, with further studies needed to confirm its long-term oncological efficacy. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 943 KiB  
Article
Laparoscopic and Open Distal Pancreatectomy—An Initial Single-Institution Experience with a Propensity Score Matching Analysis
by Irena Plahuta, Žan Šarenac, Medeja Golob, Špela Turk, Bojan Ilijevec, Tomislav Magdalenić, Stojan Potrč and Arpad Ivanecz
Life 2025, 15(1), 97; https://doi.org/10.3390/life15010097 - 14 Jan 2025
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1290
Abstract
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is a minimally invasive approach for the surgical treatment of neoplasms in the distal pancreas. This study aimed to compare this approach to the open procedure. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of 400 pancreatectomies was performed. The [...] Read more.
Laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy is a minimally invasive approach for the surgical treatment of neoplasms in the distal pancreas. This study aimed to compare this approach to the open procedure. A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of 400 pancreatectomies was performed. The laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy group (LDP) was compared to the open distal pancreatectomy group (ODP). A propensity score matching analysis (PSM) was performed. From 2016 to 2023, 108 distal pancreatectomies were carried out, 19 (17.6%) laparoscopically and 89 (82.4%) openly. The conversion rate was 13.6%. The severe morbidity rates were 28.1% in the ODP group, 47.4% in the LDP group, and 15.8% in the ODP-PSM group. The difference between the latter two was statistically significant (p = 0.034) due to the high rate of Clavien–Dindo grade 3a complications (42.1% versus 10.5%, p = 0.042) in the LDP group. The 90-day mortality rates were 3.3% in the ODP group and 5.3% in the other two groups. The LDP group had a shorter duration of intravenous narcotic analgesia (5 versus 7 days, p = 0.041). There was no difference in the R0 resection or postoperative pancreatic fistula rates. Our attention should be drawn to preventing postoperative complications because the oncological outcomes are already comparable with those of the open procedure, and postoperative pain management is promising. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 681 KiB  
Systematic Review
Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: What Is the Best Surgical Option?
by Renato Patrone, Federico Maria Mongardini, Alessandra Conzo, Chiara Cacciatore, Giovanni Cozzolino, Antonio Catauro, Eduardo Lanza, Francesco Izzo, Andrea Belli, Raffaele Palaia, Luigi Flagiello, Ferdinando De Vita, Ludovico Docimo and Giovanni Conzo
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(10), 3015; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13103015 - 20 May 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2633
Abstract
Background: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) represent a rare subset of pancreatic cancer. Functional tumors cause hormonal changes and clinical syndromes, while non-functional ones are often diagnosed late. Surgical management needs multidisciplinary planning, involving enucleation, distal pancreatectomy with or without spleen preservation, central [...] Read more.
Background: Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) represent a rare subset of pancreatic cancer. Functional tumors cause hormonal changes and clinical syndromes, while non-functional ones are often diagnosed late. Surgical management needs multidisciplinary planning, involving enucleation, distal pancreatectomy with or without spleen preservation, central pancreatectomy, pancreaticoduodenectomy or total pancreatectomy. Minimally invasive approaches have increased in the last decade compared to the open technique. The aim of this study was to analyze the current diagnostic and surgical trends for pNETs, to identify better interventions and their outcomes. Methods: The study adhered to the PRISMA guidelines, conducting a systematic review of the literature from May 2008 to March 2022 across multiple databases. Several combinations of keywords were used (“NET”, “pancreatic”, “surgery”, “laparoscopic”, “minimally invasive”, “robotic”, “enucleation”, “parenchyma sparing”) and relevant article references were manually checked. The manuscript quality was evaluated. Results: The study screened 3867 manuscripts and twelve studies were selected, primarily from Italy, the United States, and China. A total of 7767 surgically treated patients were collected from 160 included centers. The mean age was 56.3 y.o. Enucleation (EN) and distal pancreatectomy (DP) were the most commonly performed surgeries and represented 43.4% and 38.6% of the total interventions, respectively. Pancreatic fistulae, postoperative bleeding, re-operation, and follow-up were recorded and analyzed. Conclusions: Enucleation shows better postoperative outcomes and lower mortality rates compared to pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) or distal pancreatectomy (DP), despite the similar risks of postoperative pancreatic fistulae (POPF). DP is preferred over enucleation for the pancreas body–tail, while laparoscopic enucleation is better for head pNETs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 514 KiB  
Article
Short-Term Outcomes of Conventional Laparoscopic versus Robot-Assisted Distal Pancreatectomy for Malignancy: Evidence from US National Inpatient Sample, 2005–2018
by Jyun-Ming Huang, Sheng-Hsien Chen and Te-Hung Chen
Cancers 2024, 16(5), 1003; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers16051003 - 29 Feb 2024
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1328
Abstract
Background: The primary treatment for pancreatic cancer is surgical resection, and laparoscopic resection offers benefits over open surgery. This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of robot-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Methods: Data of adults ≥ 20 years old with pancreatic [...] Read more.
Background: The primary treatment for pancreatic cancer is surgical resection, and laparoscopic resection offers benefits over open surgery. This study aimed to compare the short-term outcomes of robot-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Methods: Data of adults ≥ 20 years old with pancreatic cancer who underwent conventional laparoscopic or robot-assisted laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy were extracted from the United States (US) Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) 2005–2018 database. Comorbidities and complications were identified through the International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes. Short-term outcomes were compared using logistic regression and included length of hospital stay (LOS), perioperative complications, in-hospital mortality, unfavorable discharge, and total hospital costs. Results: A total of 886 patients were included; 27% received robot-assisted, and 73% received conventional laparoscopic surgery. The mean age of all patients was 65.3 years, and 52% were females. Multivariable analysis revealed that robot-assisted surgery was associated with a significantly reduced risk of perioperative complications (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.61, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45–0.83) compared to conventional laparoscopic surgery. Specifically, robot-assisted surgery was associated with a significantly decreased risk of VTE (aOR = 0.35, 95% CI: 0.14–0.83) and postoperative blood transfusion (aOR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.23–0.61). Robot-assisted surgery was associated with a significantly shorter LOS (0.76 days shorter, 95% CI: −1.43–−0.09) but greater total hospital costs (18,284 USD greater, 95% CI: 4369.03–32,200.70) than conventional laparoscopic surgery. Conclusions: Despite the higher costs, robot-assisted distal pancreatectomy is associated with decreased risk of complications and shorter hospital stays than conventional laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Therapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 269 KiB  
Article
Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy Yields Superior Outcomes Compared to Laparoscopic Technique: A Single Surgeon Experience of 123 Consecutive Cases
by Hao Ding, Michal Kawka, Tamara M. H. Gall, Chris Wadsworth, Nagy Habib, David Nicol, David Cunningham and Long R. Jiao
Cancers 2023, 15(22), 5492; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers15225492 - 20 Nov 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2785
Abstract
Technical limitations of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP), in comparison to robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP), may translate to high conversion rates and morbidity. LDP and RDP procedures performed between December 2008 and January 2023 in our tertiary referral hepatobiliary and pancreatic centres were analysed [...] Read more.
Technical limitations of laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP), in comparison to robotic distal pancreatectomy (RDP), may translate to high conversion rates and morbidity. LDP and RDP procedures performed between December 2008 and January 2023 in our tertiary referral hepatobiliary and pancreatic centres were analysed and compared with regard to short-term outcomes. A total of 62 consecutive LDP cases and 61 RDP cases were performed. There was more conversion to open surgeries in the laparoscopic group compared with the robotic group (21.0% vs. 1.6%, p = 0.001). The LDP group also had a higher rate of postoperative complications (43.5% vs. 23.0%, p = 0.005). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of major complication or pancreatic fistular after operations (p = 0.20 and p = 0.71, respectively). For planned spleen-preserving operations, the RDP group had a shorter mean operative time (147 min vs. 194 min, p = 0.015) and a reduced total length of hospital stay compared with the LDP group (4 days vs. 7 days, p = 0.0002). The failure rate for spleen preservation was 0% in RDP and 20% (n = 5/25) in the LDP group (p = 0.009). RDP offered a better method for splenic preservation with Kimura’s technique compared with LDP to avoid the risk of splenic infarction and gastric varices related to ligation and division of splenic pedicles. RDP should be the standard operation for the resection of pancreatic tumours at the body and tail of the pancreas without involving the celiac axis or common hepatic artery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Updates on Surgical Treatment of Pancreaticobiliary Cancers)
10 pages, 537 KiB  
Article
Minimally Invasive Distal Pancreatectomy Techniques: A Contemporary Analysis Exploring Trends, Similarities, and Differences to Open Surgery
by Fernanda Romero-Hernandez, Sarah Mohamedaly, Phoebe Miller, Natalie Rodriguez, Lucia Calthorpe, Patricia C. Conroy, Amir Ashraf Ganjouei, Kenzo Hirose, Ajay V. Maker, Eric Nakakura, Carlos Corvera, Kimberly S. Kirkwood, Adnan Alseidi and Mohamed A. Adam
Cancers 2022, 14(22), 5625; https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14225625 - 16 Nov 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1745
Abstract
Limited contemporary data has compared similarities and differences between total laparoscopic (LDP), hand-assisted (HALDP), and open distal pancreatectomy (ODP). This study aimed to examine similarities and differences in outcomes between these three approaches in a contemporary cohort. Methods: Patients undergoing elective LDP, HALDP, [...] Read more.
Limited contemporary data has compared similarities and differences between total laparoscopic (LDP), hand-assisted (HALDP), and open distal pancreatectomy (ODP). This study aimed to examine similarities and differences in outcomes between these three approaches in a contemporary cohort. Methods: Patients undergoing elective LDP, HALDP, and ODP in the NSQIP dataset (2014–2019) were included. Descriptive statistics and multivariate regression analyses were employed to compare postoperative outcomes. Results: Among 5636 patients, 33.9% underwent LDP, 13.1% HALDP, and 52.9% ODP. Compared with the LDP approach, surgical site infections were more frequent in HALDP and ODP approaches (1.2% vs. 2.6% vs. 2.8%, respectively, p < 0.01). After adjustment, the LDP approach was associated with a significantly lower likelihood of surgical site infection (OR 0.25, p = 0.03) when compared to ODP. There was no difference in the likelihood of surgical site infection when HALDP was compared to ODP (OR 0.59, p = 0.40). Unadjusted operative times were similar between approaches (LDP = 192 min, HALDP = 193 min, ODP = 191 min, p = 0.59). After adjustment, the LDP approach had a longer operative time (+10.3 min, p = 0.04) compared to ODP. There was no difference in the adjusted operative time between HALDP and ODP approaches (+5.4 min, p = 0.80). Conclusions: Compared to ODP, LDP was associated with improved surgical site infection rates and slightly longer operative times. There was no difference in surgical site infection rates between ODP and HALDP. Surgeon comfort and experience should decide the operative approach, but it is important to discuss the differences between these approaches with patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Cancer Informatics and Big Data)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1552 KiB  
Review
Robotic versus Laparoscopic Surgery for Spleen-Preserving Distal Pancreatectomies: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Gianluca Rompianesi, Roberto Montalti, Luisa Ambrosio and Roberto Ivan Troisi
J. Pers. Med. 2021, 11(6), 552; https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm11060552 - 13 Jun 2021
Cited by 24 | Viewed by 3811
Abstract
Background: When oncologically feasible, avoiding unnecessary splenectomies prevents patients who are undergoing distal pancreatectomy (DP) from facing significant thromboembolic and infective risks. Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Web Of Science identified 11 studies reporting outcomes of 323 patients undergoing intended [...] Read more.
Background: When oncologically feasible, avoiding unnecessary splenectomies prevents patients who are undergoing distal pancreatectomy (DP) from facing significant thromboembolic and infective risks. Methods: A systematic search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Web Of Science identified 11 studies reporting outcomes of 323 patients undergoing intended spleen-preserving minimally invasive robotic DP (SP-RADP) and 362 laparoscopic DP (SP-LADP) in order to compare the spleen preservation rates of the two techniques. The risk of bias was evaluated according to the Newcastle–Ottawa Scale. Results: SP-RADP showed superior results over the laparoscopic approach, with an inferior spleen preservation failure risk difference (RD) of 0.24 (95% CI 0.15, 0.33), reduced open conversion rate (RD of −0.05 (95% CI −0.09, −0.01)), reduced blood loss (mean difference of −138 mL (95% CI −205, −71)), and mean difference in hospital length of stay of −1.5 days (95% CI −2.8, −0.2), with similar operative time, clinically relevant postoperative pancreatic fistula (ISGPS grade B/C), and Clavien–Dindo grade ≥3 postoperative complications. Conclusion: Both SP-RADP and SP-LADP proved to be safe and effective procedures, with minimal perioperative mortality and low postoperative morbidity. The robotic approach proved to be superior to the laparoscopic approach in terms of spleen preservation rate, intraoperative blood loss, and hospital length of stay. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Update on Robotic Gastrointestinal Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 244 KiB  
Article
Predictive Factors Associated with Complications after Laparoscopic Distal Pancreatectomy
by Ki Byung Song, Sarang Hong, Hwa Jung Kim, Yejong Park, Jaewoo Kwon, Woohyung Lee, Eunsung Jun, Jae Hoon Lee, Dae Wook Hwang and Song Cheol Kim
J. Clin. Med. 2020, 9(9), 2766; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9092766 - 26 Aug 2020
Cited by 13 | Viewed by 2786
Abstract
Although laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) has become more popular, the postoperative complication rate remains high. We sought to identify the risk factors for post-LDP complications. We examined 1227 patients who underwent LDP between March 2005 and December 2015 at a single large-volume center. [...] Read more.
Although laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) has become more popular, the postoperative complication rate remains high. We sought to identify the risk factors for post-LDP complications. We examined 1227 patients who underwent LDP between March 2005 and December 2015 at a single large-volume center. We used logistic regression for the analysis. The overall (13.2%) and major (3.3%) complication rates were determined. Postoperative pancreatic fistula was the most frequent complication, and 58 patients (4.7%) had clinically significant (grade B) pancreatic fistulas. No 90-day mortality was recorded. Long operative time (≥200 min), large estimated blood loss (≥320 mL), LDP performed by an inexperienced surgeon (<50 cases), and concomitant splenectomy were identified as risk factors for overall complications using a logistic regression model. For major complications, male sex (p = 0.020), long operative time (p = 0.005), and LDP performed by an inexperienced surgeon (p = 0.026) were significant predictive factors. Using logistic regression analysis, surgery-related factors, including long operative time and LDP performed by an inexperienced surgeon, were correlated with overall and major complications of LDP. As LDP is a technically challenging procedure, surgery-related variables emerged as the main risk factors for postoperative complications. Appropriate patient selection and sufficient surgeon experience may be essential to reduce the complications of LDP. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Optimizing Outcomes of Pancreatic Surgery)
9 pages, 3413 KiB  
Case Report
Pancreatic Hydatid Cyst Misdiagnosed as Mucinous Cystadenoma: CT and MRI Findings
by Milica Mitrovic, Boris Tadic, Jelena Kovac, Nikola Grubor, Vladimir Milosavljevic, Aleksandra Jankovic, Igor Khatkov, Dejan Radenkovic and Slavko Matic
Medicina 2020, 56(3), 124; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina56030124 - 13 Mar 2020
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 4498
Abstract
Isolated hydatid cysts of the pancreas are rare lesions, even in endemic regions. In this report, we present the case of a 76-year-old patient who was admitted to our clinic with a diagnosis of a cystic lesion in the tail of the pancreas. [...] Read more.
Isolated hydatid cysts of the pancreas are rare lesions, even in endemic regions. In this report, we present the case of a 76-year-old patient who was admitted to our clinic with a diagnosis of a cystic lesion in the tail of the pancreas. On preoperative computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) examination, the cyst was characterized as a mucinous cystadenoma. A laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy followed. A histopathological examination revealed a large hydatid cyst in the tail of the pancreas. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 838 KiB  
Case Report
Single Incision Pediatric Endoscopic Surgery: From Myth to Reality a Case Series
by Bradley J. Wallace, Raphael N. Vuille-dit-Bille and Ahmed I. Marwan
Medicina 2019, 55(9), 574; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina55090574 - 7 Sep 2019
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2672
Abstract
Laparoscopic surgery has continued to evolve to minimize access sites and scars in both the adult and pediatric populations. In children, single-incision pediatric endoscopic surgery (SIPES) has been shown to be effective, feasible, and safe with comparative results to multiport equivalents. Thus, the [...] Read more.
Laparoscopic surgery has continued to evolve to minimize access sites and scars in both the adult and pediatric populations. In children, single-incision pediatric endoscopic surgery (SIPES) has been shown to be effective, feasible, and safe with comparative results to multiport equivalents. Thus, the use of SIPES continues over increasingly complex cases, however, conceptions of its efficacy continue to vary greatly. In the present case series and discussion, we review the history of SIPES techniques and its current application today. We present this in the setting of five common myths about SIPES techniques: limitations against complex cases, restrictions to specialized training, increased morbidity outcomes, increased operative lengths, and increased operative costs. Regarding the myth of SIPES being limited in application to simple cases, examples were highlighted throughout the literature in addition to the authors’ own experience with three complex cases including resection of a lymphatic malformation, splenectomy with cholecystectomy, and distal pancreatectomy with splenectomy. A review of SIPES learning curves shows equivalent operative outcomes to multiport learning curves and advancements towards practical workshops to increase trainee familiarity can help assuage these aptitudes. In assessing comorbidities, adult literature reveals a slight increase in incisional hernia rates, but this does not correlate with single-incision pediatric data. In experienced hands, operative SIPES times average approximate multiport laparoscopic equivalents. Finally, regarding expenses, SIPES represents an equivalent alternative to laparoscopic techniques. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop