Search Results (170)

We evaluated global radiotherapy practices in the management of early-stage (AJCC/UICC 8th edition stages I-II) glottic cancer (ESGC). A cross-sectional online survey was conducted in March 2025 across centers worldwide. Data was collected on clinical practices, including staging, CT simulation, target volumes delineation, organs-at-risk contouring, radiotherapy techniques, dose and fractionation schedules, treatment delivery techniques, and image guidance practices. A total of 181 responses were received, primarily from Asia (41.4%) and Europe (24.3%). Most respondents were from non-academic public centers (44.2%), with multidisciplinary team involvement reported by 84.5%. Head and neck CT scan was the most used staging modality (80.1%). Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy was the most common planning technique (82.9%). Hypofractionated radiotherapy schedules predominated for T1 (84%) and T2 (72.4%) disease. T1a was typically treated with whole-larynx target volume (72.4%). Use of ipsilateral involved vocal cord irradiation varied by geographical region (p = 0.015), being most common in North America (44.8%) and Europe (38.6%). Accelerated fractionation for T2 also differed significantly (p < 0.001), with the highest use reported in North America (41.4%). Daily Cone-Beam Computed Tomography was acquired by (58.2%). In total, 70% of respondents expressed interest in the results of a future phase III randomized trial comparing stereotactic body radiation therapy to conventional radiotherapy. Significant global variations in radiotherapy practices for ESGC were observed, likely reflecting disparities in access and differences in institutional protocols. The development and implementation of standardized, evidence-based global guidelines are essential to harmonize care, minimize toxicity, and improve outcomes for patients with ESGC. Full article

Background/Objectives: Traditional radiotherapy treatments assume that patient anatomy remains unchanged over the course of treatment. Image guidance is used to reproduce the patient setup as closely as possible, and planning margins are used to account for setup errors. With the development of MR-guided Adaptive Radiotherapy (MRgART), daily plan adaptations are now feasible, allowing clinicians to edit the plan according to daily anatomical fluctuations. However, MRgART is currently restricted to step-and-shoot IMRT delivery, which can have reduced dose conformality compared to VMAT. In this study, we compare the accumulated dose over all fractions in prostate SBRT treatments for non-adaptive and adaptive external beam workflows. Methods: The simulation and daily images of twenty previously treated MRgART prostate SBRT patients were anonymized. On each simulation image, whole prostate VMAT and MRgART SBRT plans were generated. To simulate non-adaptive treatment dose, the daily images were rigidly registered to the planning images, and the doses were recalculated on the daily images. The MRgART plans were adapted to the daily anatomy and reoptimized. All fractional doses were accumulated, using deformable image registration, and compared to their respective planned doses. Results: All MRgART dose accumulations were within clinical tolerance. Four VMAT dose accumulations had a dose constraint that fell outside of clinical tolerance. The VMAT dose accumulations had statistically lower doses to the target compared to their planned doses. Conclusions: While high-quality plans can be delivered in a non-adaptive VMAT workflow despite interfractional motion, this study suggests that MRgART produces cumulative dose distributions that more closely resemble the initial treatment plan. Full article

Radiation therapy is a central component of the definitive and postoperative management for head and neck cancers (HNC), with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) now standard. Within these techniques, two principal boost strategies are used: simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) and sequential boost (SEQ). Although both are guideline-supported, they differ in planning logistics, treatment delivery, potential radiobiologic effects, adaptability to anatomic change, and potential toxicity profiles. In this narrative review, we summarize the key technical, dosimetric, and radiobiologic differences between SIB and SEQ and synthesize the available comparative clinical data, with a focus on their roles in contemporary dose de-escalation strategies. SIB allows for differential dosing within a single plan and potentially shorter overall treatment time but typically delivers higher biologically effective doses (BED) to elective nodal regions. SEQ requires two plans but offers greater flexibility for adaptive replanning, facilitates a lower BED to elective nodal volumes, and may allow for partial normal tissue recovery during the boost phase. Comparative studies, including retrospective series, randomized trials, and a meta-analysis, have not demonstrated consistent differences between SIB and SEQ in survival or local control, with mixed findings regarding toxicity. In the context of de-escalation, multiple prospective studies have successfully used SEQ to reduce elective nodal dose with low rates of elective nodal failure, while recent data suggest that SIB-based elective dose reduction may also be feasible in select settings. Overall, both SIB and SEQ are effective boost strategies in HNC radiotherapy. While practice is often driven by institutional workflow and clinician preference, emerging evidence suggests potential advantages of SEQ for elective nodal dose de-escalation. Further prospective studies are needed to better define the relative impacts of SIB and SEQ on toxicity and tumor control. Full article

With the introduction of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) in locally advanced rectal cancer treatment, multidisciplinary treatment options have become more diverse than before, and many challenges remain unresolved. A randomized clinical study in intermediate-risk locally advanced rectal cancer showed that neoadjuvant full-dose systemic chemotherapy with response-adapted omission of radiation therapy is non-inferior to concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Given that preoperative systemic chemotherapy provides an additional layer of local disease control, the traditional role and extent of neoadjuvant radiation therapy could be strategically re-evaluated within the TNT framework. In this context, a risk-adapted approach featuring selective reduction in elective nodal irradiation volume, particularly of the lateral pelvic lymph nodes, may offer a promising middle ground for treatment personalization. Drawing parallels from surgical practice—where total mesorectal excision is standard but lateral pelvic lymph node dissection is reserved for selected cases—this perspective advocates for similar selectivity in radiation therapy targeting, focusing on mesorectal and presacral regions while judiciously omitting lateral nodes in appropriately selected patients. This approach could maintain oncologic safety by focusing radiation therapy on limited but essential volumes. With modern intensity-modulated radiation therapy, reducing the target volume translates directly to enhanced organs-at-risk sparing, thereby mitigating radiation-induced toxicity. When combined with induction chemotherapy response assessment to refine patient selection, this approach can offer a biologically informed, personalized treatment paradigm that balances disease control with quality of life. Full article

Background and Purpose: This study retrospectively evaluates the outcomes of head and neck adenoid cystic carcinomas (ACCs) treated with particle therapy, including carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) alone or combined with photon therapy, at a single institution. Methods and Materials: Patients with ACC who underwent CIRT alone or a combination of CIRT and photon therapy at the Marburg Ion Therapy Center between February 2017 and December 2023 were included. Radiation therapy was administered postoperatively in surgically resectable patients and as definitive treatment in unresectable patients. Newly diagnosed patients received CIRT as a boost in combination with photon intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), while those with recurrent disease received CIRT alone. Prognostic factors were analyzed using Kaplan–Meier analysis and proportional hazards regression for multiple regression. Late toxicities (grade 3 or higher) were recorded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4. Results: A total of 73 patients were included, with a median age of 57 years (range: 16–86 years) and a median follow-up of 20 months (range: 3–70 months). The cohort included 28 males (38%) and 45 females (62%). The median CIRT dose was 24 Gy (relative biological effectiveness (RBE)) (range: 15–60 Gy) in a median of 8 fractions (range: 5–20), and the median photon dose was 50 Gy (range: 45–54 Gy) in 25 fractions (range: 15–30). Locoregional recurrence-free survival rates at 1 and 3 years were 89.6% and 75.4%, respectively, while distant metastasis-free survival rates were 82.1% and 61.4%, respectively. LC was significantly influenced by T stage, with patients with T4 tumors showing worse outcomes. Treatment was generally well tolerated, with acute side effects including mucositis and skin erythema. Severe chronic toxicities were rare, with only 1% of patients experiencing grade 3 dysphagia and grade 3 xerostomia. Conclusions: CIRT, particularly when combined with photon therapy, demonstrates favorable local control and promising efficacy in head and neck ACC, though distant metastasis remains the primary pattern of failure. Tumor stage is a significant negative prognostic factor for local control and overall survival. Full article

Mediastinal radiotherapy plays a central role in the treatment of several malignancies, particularly Hodgkin lymphoma and breast cancer. However, exposure to thoracic radiation is associated with long-term cardiovascular complications, among which valvular heart disease (VHD) is increasingly recognized. Radiation-induced VHD typically presents after a latency period of 10–20 years and is characterized by progressive valve fibrosis, thickening, and calcification, most commonly affecting the left-sided valves. Management of radiation-induced VHD generally follows standard guidelines but remains challenging due to extensive calcification and coexisting radiation-related cardiac or pulmonary injury. A history of thoracic radiotherapy is associated with increased perioperative risk and may negatively impact surgical outcomes, which often alters the risk–benefit balance and favors less invasive therapeutic approaches. Advances in the transcatheter approach have expanded treatment options for this high-risk population; however, data on long-term outcomes remain limited. Evolving dose-reduction techniques, such as deep-inspiration breath-hold, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and proton therapy, together with predictive dosimetric models, aim to minimize future cardiac toxicity. Given the delayed onset and progressive nature of radiation-associated VHD, structured long-term surveillance is essential to enable early detection and timely intervention in cancer survivors at risk. Full article

Background and Objectives: The axillary lateral vessel thoracic junction (ALTJ) is a key lymphatic drainage pathway for the arm and a potential structure to spare during regional nodal irradiation (RNI) to reduce lymphedema risk in breast cancer patients. This study aims to demonstrate the feasibility of ALTJ-sparing radiation therapy (RT) planning using Tomotherapy. Materials and Methods: Ten breast cancer patients who had undergone axillary lymph node dissection and whose dissected axillary levels were excluded from the RNI target volume were included. A TomoDirect intensity-modulated RT plan was generated at a dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions. The dissected axilla was not designated as an organ at risk (OAR) in the original treatment plan. For this study, the axillary lymph node level I (AXL1) and the ALTJ were delineated retrospectively, with the ALTJ considered an OAR in the newly generated study plan. A total of 20 RT plans (10 per group) were statistically compared using various dose-volume parameters. Results: Compared to the original plans, the study plans with ALTJ as an OAR significantly reduced the incidental dose to both the ALTJ (mean: 41.7 ± 3.4 Gy vs. 27.2 ± 1.3 Gy; p = 0.005) and the AXL1 (mean: 43.9 ± 2.0 Gy vs. 37.7 ± 1.9 Gy; p = 0.005). All other dosimetric parameters (V25Gy, V35Gy, V40Gy, Dmin, Dmax) for the ALTJ were also significantly lower in the study plans. This ALTJ sparing was achieved while maintaining all required dose-volume constraints for target volumes and standard OARs such as the lung and heart. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that simply excluding the dissected axilla from the target volume without designating it as an OAR still results in a substantial incidental dose to this region. Our findings also show the feasibility of using Tomotherapy to selectively spare the axilla, particularly the ALTJ subregion of AXL1, which is critical for lymphedema risk in breast cancer patients. Full article

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive malignancy with a high incidence of brain metastases. Prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) was developed to reduce central nervous system (CNS) relapses and has been shown to improve survival, particularly in limited-stage disease. The pivotal Auperin meta-analysis and subsequent studies confirmed its role in patients achieving a complete response to initial therapy. In extensive-stage SCLC, earlier trials demonstrated reduced brain metastases and modest survival gains, but more recent studies incorporating routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) surveillance failed to show overall survival benefits, supporting MRI monitoring with salvage therapy as an alternative. Neurocognitive toxicity remains the major limitation of PCI, especially in older adults. Common effects include memory impairment, cognitive changes, and a reduced quality of life. Advances such as hippocampal avoidance PCI and neuroprotective strategies like memantine have shown the ability to mitigate long-term decline. Modern radiotherapy techniques, including intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), enable the precise sparing of critical structures while maintaining intracranial control. The integration of immunotherapy has shifted treatment paradigms in SCLC. While checkpoint inhibitors have improved systemic outcomes, their impact on brain relapses and interactions with PCI remain uncertain. This review provides an overview of the evolution of PCI in SCLC, while emphasizing current challenges and future directions. Full article

Radiation therapy (RT) has been one of the standard treatments for prostate cancer; however, its potential impact on nearby neural structures, such as the lumbosacral plexus (LSP), is often overlooked. The lack of contouring in treatment plans has led to unintended consequences. Radiation-induced lumbosacral plexopathy (RILSP) is a rare but serious complication that presents with progressive lower extremity sensory changes and weakness, mimicking radiculopathy. We report the case of a 66-year-old male who developed bilateral lower extremity neurological deficits post-pelvic radiation for prostate cancer. Radiographically, no compressive lesions were found, and the Electromyography (EMG) revealed involvement of nerves inconsistent with radiculopathy. This led to the diagnosis of RILSP. This case highlights the importance of recognition of RILSP in contrast to radiculopathy in patients with unexplained neurological symptoms after pelvic RT. This highlights the importance of incorporating the LSP as an organ at risk while planning for RT and reviewing retrospectively the dosimetry. It also emphasizes the need for improved contouring of LSP in radiation planning to minimize adverse effects. This sentiment is reflected in the literature, along with the consensus that more research is needed to address the true rate of RILSP. Full article

Background: Nutritional status is a recognized determinant of treatment tolerance and clinical outcomes in oncology. This study aimed to assess body composition using computed tomography (CT) and to evaluate its association with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) undergoing curative multimodal therapy. Methods: A total of 216 patients with LARC who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) were retrospectively assessed. Two radiochemotherapy protocols were used: long-course chemoradiotherapy (lcCRT) (radiation therapy administered daily at doses of 1.8 or 2.0 Gy, for a total dose of 50.4–55.8 Gy) with concurrent chemotherapy: either 5-FU with leucovorin or capecitabine and total neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (tnCRT)—short-course radiotherapy (5 × 5 Gy) followed by sequential chemotherapy with CAPOX or FOLFOX. Surgery was performed 6.5 weeks after completing CRT. Radiotherapy was delivered using linear accelerators based on the Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy technique. CT scans were used to assess nutritional status. Survival analyses were performed. Data on food consumption frequency were collected using the Dietary Habits and Nutrition Beliefs Questionnaire (KomPAN^®). Non-Healthy-Diet-Index-14 (nHDI-14) was calculated. Results: Median observation time was 58 months (range 4–118 months). VATI level and OS (HR: 0.4618 95% CI: 0.2194–0.9719, p = 0.0419), as well as SATI and OS (HR: 0.4707 95% CI: 0.2286–0.9693, p = 0.0409) were significantly associated. This association was not significant for PFS (VATI: HR: 0.7084 95% CI: 0.4055–1.2376, p = 0.2259; SATI: HR: 0.6864 95% CI: 0.3932–1.1981, p = 0.1855). SMI and PMI values were not significantly related either PFS (SMI-HR: 0.6728, 95% CI: 0.4031–1.1231, p = 0.1295; PMI-HR: 0.7385, 95% CI: 0.4628–1.1785, p = 0.2036) or OS (SMI-HR: 0.9128, 95% CI: 0.4703–1.7720, p = 0.7876; PMI-HR: 0.6592 95% CI: 0.3684–1.1794, p = 0.1603). No significant association was found between sarcopenia development and PFS (HR: 1.2733 CI: 0.7589–2.1363; p = 0.3602) or OS (HR: 1.1207; CI: 0.5681–2.2107; p = 0.7424). Significant differences between men and women in alcohol intake and nHDI-14 were observed. Conclusions: Low visceral and subcutaneous adipose tissue index were significantly associated with worse OS in patients with LARC undergoing multimodal treatment. The nHDI-14 was negatively correlated with the duration of observation and patients’ age. Full article

Despite intensive worldwide research efforts and multiple available therapeutic schemes for cancer treatment, cancer still remains a challenge, rendering the need for the discovery of new therapeutic approaches imperative. Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a novel, non-invasive anti-cancer treatment that relies on the generation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) that are cytotoxic to cancer cells. ROS are generated by the interaction between a photosensitizer (PS) drug, a light source (primarily a laser), and oxygen. Although PDT offers the advantage of using non-ionizing radiation and bears great therapeutic potential, it has not yet been widely adopted in clinical practice. This review summarizes the new developments in the use of PDT in combination with chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and radiotherapy, giving emphasis to the combination of PDT with a novel type of therapy that also takes into account the tumor microenvironment (TME) to enhance treatment efficacy. TME-targeting therapies include strategies like hypoxia modulation, vascular normalization, and immune cell reprogramming. Interestingly, when combined with PDT, these therapies can improve therapeutic outcomes while reducing side effects, and nanoparticle-based delivery systems have demonstrated the potential to enhance PDT selectivity and efficiency. This review highlights PDT’s enormous potential in treating various cancer types and underscores the need for continued exploration of combination therapies to maximize its clinical impact. Full article

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), the most aggressive primary brain tumor in adults, has a poor prognosis due to rapid recurrence and treatment resistance. This review examines the evolution of radiotherapy (RT) for GBM management, from whole-brain RT to modern techniques like intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), guided by 2023 European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO)-European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) and 2025 American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) recommendations. The standard Stupp protocol (60 Gy/30 fractions with temozolomide [TMZ]) improves overall survival (OS) to 14.6 months, with greater benefits in O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT)-methylated tumors (21.7 months). Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) extend median overall survival (mOS) to 31.6 months in MGMT-methylated patients and 20.9 months overall in supratentorial GBM (EF-14 trial). However, 80–90% of recurrences occur within 2 cm of the irradiated field due to tumor infiltration and radioresistance driven by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification, phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) mutations, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A/B (CDKN2A/B) deletions, tumor hypoxia, and tumor stem cells. Pseudoprogression, distinguished using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria and positron emission tomography (PET), complicates response evaluation. Targeted therapies (e.g., bevacizumab; PARP inhibitors) and immunotherapies (e.g., pembrolizumab; oncolytic viruses), alongside advanced imaging (multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], amino acid PET), support personalized RT. Ongoing trials evaluating reirradiation, hypofractionation, stereotactic radiosurgery, neoadjuvant therapies, proton therapy (PT), boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT), and AI-driven planning aim to enhance efficacy for GBM IDH-wildtype, but phase III trials are needed to improve survival and quality of life. Full article

Background: To compare the costs of open retropubic radical prostatectomy (RRP), robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP), intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), low-dose brachytherapy (LDBT), stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT), cryotherapy (Cryo), and high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for low/intermediate-risk prostate cancer (PCa), from the healthcare system perspective. Methods: This retrospective, IRB-approved study compared the costs and charges of primary treatment options for localized PCa at Duke University Hospital between January 2018 and December 2019. We identified cases by querying the relevant disease, procedural, and charge codes from Duke Finance. Consecutive cases with NCCN high-risk disease, prior treatment, or missing institutional financial information were excluded. Costs were calculated from the point at which the treatment option was selected until the last treatment session (SBRT and IMRT) or hospital discharge (other modalities). All modalities except RRP were considered technology-intensive. Results: A total of 552 patients with a mean age of 65.0 years met the inclusion criteria. NCCN risk categories included 85 (13%) low, 218 (41%) favorable-intermediate, and 249 (46%) unfavorable-intermediate risk cases. RALP, RRP, Cryo, and HIFU were single-session treatments, whereas IMRT, SBRT, and LDBT were delivered over multiple sessions. IMRT and SBRT were the most expensive modalities, followed by RALP, HIFU, LDBT, Cryo, and RRP. The number of sessions (ρ = 0.55, p < 0.001) and being technology-intensive (ρ = 0.58, p < 0.001) were significantly correlated with treatment costs. Conclusions: In this cohort of PCa patients, treatment costs were highest for IMRT and SBRT, followed by RALP, HIFU, LDBT, Cryo, and RRP. The number of treatment sessions was a significant predictor of higher costs. Full article

Background and Objectives: Total body irradiation (TBI) remains a cornerstone of conditioning for allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). Whereas early research debated the need for irradiation, contemporary investigations focus on optimising dose, fractionation and delivery techniques. Material and Methods: We synthesised six decades of evidence, spanning from single-fraction cobalt treatments to modern helical tomotherapy and intensity-modulated total-marrow/lymphoid irradiation (TMI/TMLI). To complement the literature, we reported our institutional experience on 77 paediatric and adult recipients treated with conventional extended-source-to-skin-distance TBI at the University Hospital Policlinico “G. Rodolico–San Marco” between 2015 and 2025. Results: According to literature data, fractionated myeloablative schedules, typically 12 Gy in 6 fractions, provide superior overall survival and lower rates of severe graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) compared with historical single-dose regimens. Conversely, reduced-intensity protocols of 2–4 Gy broaden HSCT eligibility for older or comorbid patients with acceptable toxicity. Conformal planning reliably decreases mean lung dose without compromising engraftment, and early-phase trials are testing selective escalation to 16–20 Gy or omission of TBI in molecularly favourable cases. With regard to our institutional retrospective series, 92% of patients completed a 12-Gy regimen with only transient grade 1–2 nausea, fatigue or hypotension; all transplanted patients engrafted, and no grade ≥ 3 radiation pneumonitis occurred. Conclusions: Collectively, the published evidence and our experience support TBI as an irreplaceable component of HSCT conditioning and suggest that coupling it with advanced imaging, organ-sparing dosimetry and molecular response monitoring can deliver safer, more personalised therapy in the coming decade. Full article