Search Results (84)

Background and objectives: Previous dynamic collimator system (DCS) developments included: (1) hardware construction and commissioning, (2) an accurate dose calculation algorithm, (3) a quality assurance approach, and (4) development of optimization tools for treatment planning. Clinical DCS implementation necessitates efficient treatment plan delivery and fully integrated tools. In this work, a novel algorithm for minimizing treatment time was developed with the goal of reducing the DCS time increase, relative to conventional pencil beam scanning, to one minute or less per beam. In this extensive end-to-end evaluation, treatment plans generated with a modified U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-cleared treatment planning system were delivered on an Ion Beam Applications (IBA) Proteus Plus proton therapy system, with and without a DCS, to evaluate delivery times and dosimetric accuracy for a relatively large patient dataset, providing evidence of the clinical potential of the approach. Methods: Ten previously treated brain patients were replanned, consisting of both deep-seated central and superficial targets, the latter of which required an external 4 cm polyethylene range shifter. DCS treatments were optimized using a maximum conformity planning technique exploiting per-spot collimator capabilities. An optimization algorithm was incorporated to minimize treatment delivery time by determining the optimal sequencing of spot positions and collimator settings. Plan quality was quantified using conformity and dose-volume histogram (DVH)-based metrics while delivery accuracy was validated through measurements using both patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) and log file analysis at the Miami Cancer Institute (MCI). Results: The DCS reduced the dose gradient index on average by 26.4% (17.7–37.1%) and the mean dose to the adjacent healthy tissue (within 10 mm of the target) by 19.3% (16.3–26.2%). The average reduction to the mean and maximum dose to the involved optic nerves was 50% (25.7–80.7%) and 18.7%, respectively, and the mean and D_2cc dose to the involved brainstem was reduced by 63.9% (31.5–96.4%) and 60.4% (10.8–99.8%), respectively. PSQA pass rates among DCS-collimated and baseline uncollimated treatments were 99.7% and 99.2%, respectively. DCS treatment fields were delivered within an average of 49 s (32–61 s) from their uncollimated intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) counterparts. Average spot position errors were −0.05 ± 0.2 mm and 0.04 ± 0.2 mm for the x- and y-position, respectively. The maximum error in magnitude for collimator positioning was 0.2 mm or less. Conclusions: DCS collimated IMPT treatments can provide significant dosimetric improvements over uncollimated treatments. These highly collimated treatments can be delivered with sufficient accuracy for clinical use while incurring an additional time penalty of around one minute or less per field compared to uncollimated treatments. Full article

Background/Objectives: Proton therapy has emerged as an advanced radiotherapy modality due to its unique physical dose distribution and its distinct radiobiological properties. The finite range of protons in tissue enables highly conformal dose delivery with minimal exit dose, significantly reducing irradiation of surrounding normal tissues compared to photon-based radiotherapy. Beyond these physical advantages, proton beams exhibit a spatially varying linear energy transfer that increases toward the distal edge of the spread-out Bragg peak, leading to clustered and complex DNA damage that is more difficult for cancer cells to repair. Methods: This review integrates experimental, computational, and clinical evidence to examine how proton-induced DNA damage, relative biological effectiveness, oxygen effects, and non-targeted responses contribute to tumor control and normal tissue sparing. Results: Comparative analyses with photon intensity-modulated radiotherapy demonstrate consistent reductions in acute and late toxicities across multiple tumor sites, particularly in pediatric patients and in tumors located near critical organs. The review also discusses emerging technologies, including pencil beam scanning, image-guided and adaptive proton therapy, compact accelerator systems, and ultra-high dose rate FLASH proton therapy, which collectively aim to enhance treatment precision, biological effectiveness, and accessibility. Conclusions: Together, these developments support proton therapy as a rapidly evolving modality with significant potential to improve therapeutic outcomes in modern oncology. Full article

Mediastinal radiotherapy plays a central role in the treatment of several malignancies, particularly Hodgkin lymphoma and breast cancer. However, exposure to thoracic radiation is associated with long-term cardiovascular complications, among which valvular heart disease (VHD) is increasingly recognized. Radiation-induced VHD typically presents after a latency period of 10–20 years and is characterized by progressive valve fibrosis, thickening, and calcification, most commonly affecting the left-sided valves. Management of radiation-induced VHD generally follows standard guidelines but remains challenging due to extensive calcification and coexisting radiation-related cardiac or pulmonary injury. A history of thoracic radiotherapy is associated with increased perioperative risk and may negatively impact surgical outcomes, which often alters the risk–benefit balance and favors less invasive therapeutic approaches. Advances in the transcatheter approach have expanded treatment options for this high-risk population; however, data on long-term outcomes remain limited. Evolving dose-reduction techniques, such as deep-inspiration breath-hold, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and proton therapy, together with predictive dosimetric models, aim to minimize future cardiac toxicity. Given the delayed onset and progressive nature of radiation-associated VHD, structured long-term surveillance is essential to enable early detection and timely intervention in cancer survivors at risk. Full article

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), the most aggressive primary brain tumor in adults, has a poor prognosis due to rapid recurrence and treatment resistance. This review examines the evolution of radiotherapy (RT) for GBM management, from whole-brain RT to modern techniques like intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), guided by 2023 European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO)-European Association of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) and 2025 American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) recommendations. The standard Stupp protocol (60 Gy/30 fractions with temozolomide [TMZ]) improves overall survival (OS) to 14.6 months, with greater benefits in O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT)-methylated tumors (21.7 months). Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) extend median overall survival (mOS) to 31.6 months in MGMT-methylated patients and 20.9 months overall in supratentorial GBM (EF-14 trial). However, 80–90% of recurrences occur within 2 cm of the irradiated field due to tumor infiltration and radioresistance driven by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) amplification, phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) mutations, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A/B (CDKN2A/B) deletions, tumor hypoxia, and tumor stem cells. Pseudoprogression, distinguished using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) criteria and positron emission tomography (PET), complicates response evaluation. Targeted therapies (e.g., bevacizumab; PARP inhibitors) and immunotherapies (e.g., pembrolizumab; oncolytic viruses), alongside advanced imaging (multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging [MRI], amino acid PET), support personalized RT. Ongoing trials evaluating reirradiation, hypofractionation, stereotactic radiosurgery, neoadjuvant therapies, proton therapy (PT), boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT), and AI-driven planning aim to enhance efficacy for GBM IDH-wildtype, but phase III trials are needed to improve survival and quality of life. Full article

Proton beam therapy for head and neck cancers traditionally employs a fixed relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of 1.1, which may underestimate actual biological effects in critical structures. This study evaluates how Linear Energy Transfer (LET) optimization could potentially prevent radiation-induced brachial plexopathy (RIBP). (1) Case presentation: A 65-year-old male with stage IVA p16-positive oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma received pencil-beam-scanning intensity-modulated proton therapy with concurrent cisplatin. Due to a right level 4 neck node, the high-risk target volume overlapped with the brachial plexus, resulting in a D0.1cc of 70.3 Gy (RBE = 1.1). Four years post-treatment, the patient developed progressive right upper extremity paresthesia, weakness, and dysesthesia. Electromyography revealed myokymia consistent with brachial plexopathy, while MRI showed hyperintensity of the right brachial plexus corresponding to the radiation field. Conservative treatment with pentoxifylline, gabapentin, and physical therapy improved his symptoms. (2) Methods: The original treatment plan was retrospectively analyzed using Monte Carlo dose algorithms and LET-dependent RBE models from McMahon and McNamara. An LET-optimized plan was created to limit LET_d to 2.0 keV/µm in the brachial plexus. (3) Results: The relative biological equivalent (RBE) dose to 0.1cc of the brachial plexus was 77.8 Gy (CGE RBE), exceeding tolerance. The LET-optimized plan reduced the brachial plexus D0.1cc to 59.4 Gy (RBE = 1.1) and 63.2 Gy (CGE RBE), an 18.8% decrease, while maintaining target coverage. LET_d, within the brachial plexus enhancement, decreased from 5.3 to 2.6 keV/μm. (4) Conclusion: This case highlights the potential clinical importance of LET optimization in proton therapy planning, particularly when organs-at-risk overlap with target volumes. By reducing LET_d from 5.3 to 2.6 keV/μm and biological equivalent dose by 18.8%, LET optimization could potentially prevent late toxicities, like RIBP, while maintaining target coverage. Full article

Purpose: This study aimed to compare long-term patient-reported outcomes in bowel and urinary domains between intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) for localized prostate cancer. Methods and Materials: Patients with clinical T1–T2 prostate cancer receiving IMRT or IMPT at a tertiary cancer center from 2015–2018 were analyzed to determine the changes in the prospectively collected bowel function (BF), urinary irritative/obstructive symptoms (UO), and urinary incontinence (UI) domains of EPIC-26. The mean changes in EPIC-26 scores were evaluated from pretreatment to 24 months post-radiotherapy for each modality. A score change >50% of the baseline standard deviation was considered a clinically meaningful change. Results: A total of 82 patients treated with IMRT (52.2%) and 56 patients treated with IMPT (53.3%) completed the questionnaire at baseline and 24 months post-RT. There were no baseline differences in domain scores between treatment modalities. At 24 months post-radiotherapy, there was a significant and clinically meaningful decline in the BF mean score in the IMRT cohort (−4.52 (range −50, 29.17), p = 0.003), whereas the decline in BF score did not reach clinical relevance or significance (−1.88 (range −37.5, 50), p = 0.046) when accounting for the Bonferroni adjustment in the IMPT cohort. A higher proportion of patients treated with IMRT had a clinically relevant reduction in BF when compared with IMPT (47.37% vs. 25.93%, p = 0.017). The mean changes in the UI and UO scores of the IMRT and IMPT cohorts were neither statically significant nor clinically relevant. Conclusions: IMPT leads to a smaller decrease in BF than IMRT at 24 months post-RT, while there was no differential effect on UO and UI. Full article

Background/Objectives: We aimed to compare the salivary gland volume changes following intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) alone versus IMRT/intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) combination in oropharyngeal cancer (OPC). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 78 OPC patients who underwent definitive RT with ipsilateral neck irradiation. RT techniques were either IMRT alone or IMRT/IMPT combination. Salivary gland volumes over time in relation to dry mouth symptom were evaluated. Results: Patients’ characteristics were well balanced between groups. The mean dose to the ipsilateral parotid gland (PG) was significantly lower in IMRT alone than in IMRT/IMPT combination, while those to the contralateral PG and submandibular glands (SMGs) were significantly higher in IMRT alone. The volume ratio of ipsilateral PG showed an initial sharp decline, reaching 0.74, and stabilized thereafter. The ipsilateral SMG showed a continuous decline until 24 months and reached approximately 0.47 by 48 months. The contralateral PG/SMG showed initial decline and subsequent recovery to the initial volume by 48 months. There were no significant differences in salivary gland volume changes between groups. Within 6 months, 60.3% of patients experienced dry mouth symptom, and the dry mouth incidence decreased to 41.0% in 12 months and remained stable thereafter. There were no significant differences in dry mouth symptom between groups. The volume reduction in the ipsilateral salivary glands was greater in patients with dry mouth symptom. Conclusions: No significant differences in salivary gland volume changes and dry mouth symptom were apparent between groups. The critical factor in salivary gland volume change was the delivered dose to the salivary glands, not the RT techniques. Full article

Background/Objectives: Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for skull base reirradiation is particularly challenging, as patients have already received substantial radiation doses to the region, and nearby normal organs may have approached their tolerance limit from prior treatments. In this study, we reviewed the characteristics and capabilities of four advanced external beam radiation delivery systems and four modern treatment planning systems and evaluated the treatment plan quality of each technique using skull base reirradiation patient cases. Methods: SBRT plans were generated for sixteen skull base reirradiation patients using four modalities: the GK plan for the Elekta Leksell Gamma Knife Perfexion/ICON, the CyberKnife (CK) plan for the Accuray CyberKnife, the intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) plan for the Hitachi ProBeat-FR proton therapy machine, and the volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan for the Varian TrueBeam STx. These plans were evaluated and compared using two novel gradient indices in addition to traditional dosimetry metrics for targets and organs at risk (OARs). The steepest border gradient quantified the percent prescription dose fall-off per millimeter at the boundary between the target and adjacent critical structures. This gradient index highlighted the system’s ability to spare nearby critical OARs. The volume gradient assessed the extent of dose spread outside the target toward the patient’s body. Results: All plans achieved comparable target coverage and conformity, while IMPT and VMAT demonstrated significantly better uniformity. The GK plans exhibited the highest border gradient, up to 20.9%/mm, followed by small-spot-size IMPT plans and CK plans. Additionally, IMPT plans showed the benefit of reduced dose spread in low-dose regions and the lowest maximum and mean doses to the brainstem and carotid artery. Conclusions: The advanced external beam radiotherapy modalities evaluated in this study are well-suited for SBRT in skull base reirradiation, which demands precise targeting of tumors with highly conformal doses and steep dose gradients to protect nearby normal structures. Full article

Background: Radiotherapy for thymoma is delivered post-operatively in selected cases. Given the particular location of the thymic bed and the excellent prognosis, late cardiac toxicities may be an issue. The purpose of this retrospective dosimetric study is to investigate whether intensity-modulated proton beam therapy (IMPT) compared to photon therapy could better spare cardiac substructures, given prespecified dose constraints. Methods: We retrospectively selected patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy for thymoma in our institution. We manually contoured fourteen cardiac substructures (CSs), with the supervision of a team of cardioradiologists. The photon-based plans were re-optimized in adherence to the volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique with specific dose constraints for the new contoured structures. The proton-based plans were optimized in adherence to intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) using the beam spot scanning technique. Results: Twenty-nine patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy with a prescribed dose of 50 Gy in 25 daily fractions for radically resected thymoma were selected. IMPT demonstrated better sparing of most cardiac substructures in terms of Dmax, D_mean and V_5Gy. Finally, IMPT plans more easily achieved the proposed dose constraints. Conclusions: Cardiac substructures can be successfully spared with IMPT. Clinical studies are needed to establish a relationship between dose parameters and the development of cardiac events. Full article

Approximately 36% of patients with cervical cancer present with regional nodal metastasis at diagnosis, which is associated with adverse survival outcomes after definitive treatment. In the modern era of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and image-guided adaptive brachytherapy (IGABT), where excellent local control is achieved for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC), nodal failure remains a major challenge to cure. To optimize treatment outcomes for node-positive LACC and reduce the incidence of nodal failure, various treatment approaches have been explored, including methods of surgical nodal staging or dissection, RT dose escalation strategies, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to involved nodes, and elective treatment of subclinical para-aortic (PAO) disease. Additionally, there is growing interest in emerging precision RT techniques, such as magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) and proton therapy, which may allow for further improvement in the therapeutic ratio. This review outlines the various methods of detection of nodal metastasis, treatment options for node-positive LACC, techniques of nodal radiotherapy and their clinical evidence in efficacy and toxicity profiles. Furthermore, recent advances in systemic therapy and promising novel therapeutic directions that may shape the management of node-positive LACC are discussed. Full article

Unresectable stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a clinical challenge, due to the need for optimal local and systemic control. The management of unresectable Stage III NSCLC has evolved with advancements in radiation therapy (RT), systemic therapies, and immunotherapy. For patients with locally advanced NSCLC who are not surgical candidates, concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) has modest survival outcomes, due to both local progression and distant metastasis. Efforts to enhance outcomes have led to dose-escalation trials, advances in modern RT techniques such as intensity-modulated RT (IMRT) and proton beam therapy (PBT), and the integration of adaptive RT to optimize target coverage while sparing organs at risk. Concurrent and consolidative immunotherapy, particularly with PD-L1 inhibitors, has shown promise, as evidenced by the PACIFIC trial, which demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with durvalumab following CRT. Ongoing trials are now investigating novel immunotherapy combinations and targeted therapies in this setting, including dual checkpoint inhibition, DNA repair inhibitors, and molecularly targeted agents like osimertinib for EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Emerging biomarkers, such as circulating tumor DNA and radiomics, offer potential for personalizing treatment and predicting outcomes. Additionally, PBT and MR-guided adaptive RT have shown the potential to reduce toxicities while maintaining efficacy. Integrating these novel approaches may offer opportunities for optimizing treatment responses and minimizing adverse effects in this challenging patient population. Further investigation into patient stratification, biomarker-driven therapy, and refined therapeutic combinations is essential to improve long-term outcomes in unresectable Stage III NSCLC. This narrative review explores the current management strategies for unresectable Stage III NSCLC, from a radiation oncology perspective. Full article

Radiotherapy (RT) is an integral component in the multidisciplinary management of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Significant advances have been made toward optimizing tumor control and toxicity profiles of RT for HNSCC in the past two decades. The development of intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and concurrent chemotherapy established the standard of care for most patients with locally advanced HNSCC around the turn of the century. More recently, selective dose escalation to the most radioresistant part of tumor and avoidance of the most critical substructures of organs at risk, often guided by functional imaging, allowed even further improvement in the therapeutic ratio of IMRT. Other highly conformal RT modalities, including intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) are being increasingly utilized, although there are gaps in our understanding of the normal tissue complication probabilities and their relative biological effectiveness. There is renewed interest in spatially fractionated radiotherapy (SFRT), such as GRID and LATTICE radiotherapy, in both palliative and definitive settings. The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized the treatment of patients with recurrent and metastatic HNSCC. Novel RT modalities, including IMPT, SBRT, and SFRT, have the potential to reduce lymphopenia and immune suppression, stimulate anti-tumor immunity, and synergize with ICIs. The next frontier in the treatment of HNSCC may lie in the exploration of combined modality treatment with new RT technologies and ICIs. Full article

Background: Proton therapy requires caution when treating patients with targets near neural structures. Intuitive and quantitative guidelines are needed to support decision-making concerning the treatment modality. This study compared dosimetric profiles of intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) using helical tomotherapy (HT) for adaptive re-planning in cT3-4 nasopharyngeal cancer (NPCa) patients, aiming to establish criteria for selecting appropriate treatment modalities. Methods: HT and IMPT plans were generated for 28 cT3-4 NPCa patients undergoing definitive radiotherapy. Dosimetric comparisons were performed for target coverage and high-priority organs at risk (OARs). The correlation between dosimetric parameters and RT modality selection was analyzed with the target OAR distances. Results: Target coverages were similar, while IMPT achieved better dose spillage. HT was more favorable for brainstem D₁, optic chiasm D_max, optic nerves D_max, and p-cord D₁. IMPT showed advantages for oral cavity D_mean. Actually, 14 IMPT and 14 HT plans were selected as adaptive plans, with IMPT allocated to most cT3 patients (92.9% vs. 42.9%, p = 0.013). The shortest distances from the target to neural structures were negatively correlated with OAR doses. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were carried out to discover the optimal cut-off values of the shortest distances between the target and the OARs (temporal lobes and brainstem), which were 0.75 cm (AUC = 0.908, specificity = 1.00) and 0.85 cm (AUC = 0.857, specificity = 0.929), respectively. Conclusions: NPCa patients with cT4 tumor or with the shortest distance between the target and critical neural structures < 0.8 cm were suboptimal candidates for IMPT adaptive re-planning. These criteria may improve resource utilization and clinical outcomes. Full article

Purpose: To evaluate and compare the deliverability of ‘sawtooth’ proton arc therapy (PAT) plans relative to static intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) at a cyclotron-based clinical facility. Methods: The delivery of single and dual arc Sawtooth PAT plans for an abdominal CT phantom and multiple clinical cases of brain, head and neck (H&N) and base of skull (BoS) targets was emulated under the step-and-shoot and continuous PAT delivery regimes and compared to that of a corresponding static IMPT plan. Results: Continuous PAT delivery increased the time associated with beam delivery and gantry movement in single/dual PAT plans by 4.86/7.34 min (brain), 7.51/12.40 min (BoS) and 6.59/10.57 min (H&N) on average relative to static IMPT. Step-and-shoot PAT increased this delivery time further by 4.79 min on average as the delivery was limited by gantry motion. Conclusions: The emulator can approximately model clinical sawtooth PAT delivery but requires experimental validation. No clear benefit was observed regarding beam-on time for sawtooth PAT relative to static IMPT. Full article

Mucosal melanoma of the head and neck (HNMM) is a rare but highly aggressive malignancy, often diagnosed at an advanced stage with poor prognosis. This review discusses current treatment strategies, emphasizing the role of radiotherapy in managing this challenging disease. A comprehensive analysis of 33 studies provides updated information on techniques and outcomes, highlighting the consistent benefit of adjuvant radiation in improving local control. Advances in conformal techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), have significantly reduced toxicity rates. Preliminary data on proton and carbon ion therapies suggest the potential for further enhancement of the therapeutic ratio, despite limited availability. Although recent studies report 3-year local control rates as high as 90%, overall survival within the same time frame remains well below 50–60%, underscoring the need for continued improvement in systemic therapies to address the persistent issue of distant metastases. Full article