Search Results (2,582)

Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (HL) affects approximately 8500 individuals annually in the United States. The 5-year relative survival rate has improved to 88.5%, driven by transformative advances in immunotherapy and precision oncology. The integration of Brentuximab vedotin (BV) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has redefined treatment paradigms. The phase III SWOG S1826 trial established nivolumab plus doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (N + AVD) as an emerging new standard for advanced-stage HL, achieving a 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) of 92% compared to 83% for BV plus AVD (HR 0.48, 95% CI: 0.33–0.70), with superior safety, particularly in patients over 60. In relapsed/refractory HL, pembrolizumab outperforms BV, with a median PFS of 13.2 versus 8.3 months (HR 0.65, 95% CI: 0.48–0.88), as demonstrated in the KEYNOTE-204 trial. Emerging strategies, including novel ICI combinations, minimal residual disease (MRD) monitoring via circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), and artificial intelligence (AI)-driven diagnostics, promise to further personalize therapy. This review synthesizes HL’s epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnostic innovations, and therapeutic advances, highlighting the role of precision medicine in addressing unmet needs and disparities in HL care. Full article

In today’s oncology, immunotherapy arises as a potent complement for conventional cancer treatment, allowing for obtaining better patient outcomes. B7-H3 (CD276) is a member of the B7 protein family, which emerged as an attractive target for the treatment of various tumors. The molecule modulates anti-cancer immune responses, acting through diverse signaling pathways and cell populations. It has been implicated in the pathogenesis of numerous malignancies, including melanoma, gliomas, lung cancer, gynecological cancers, renal cancer, gastrointestinal tumors, and others, fostering the immunosuppressive environment and marking worse prognosis for the patients. B7-H3 targeting therapies, such as monoclonal antibodies, antibody–drug conjugates, and CAR T-cells, present promising results in preclinical studies and are the subject of ongoing clinical trials. CAR-T therapies against B7-H3 have demonstrated utility in malignancies such as melanoma, glioblastoma, prostate cancer, and RCC. Moreover, ADCs targeting B7-H3 exerted cytotoxic effects on glioblastoma, neuroblastoma cells, prostate cancer, and craniopharyngioma models. B7-H3-targeting also delivers promising results in combined therapies, enhancing the response to other immune checkpoint inhibitors and giving hope for the development of approaches with minimized adverse effects. However, the strategies of B7-H3 blocking deliver substantial challenges, such as poorly understood molecular mechanisms behind B7-H3 protumor properties or therapy toxicity. In this review, we discuss B7-H3’s role in modulating immune responses, its significance for various malignancies, and clinical trials evaluating anti-B7-H3 immunotherapeutic strategies, focusing on the clinical potential of the molecule. Full article

Background: Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a common malignancy with a rising global incidence. While cytoreductive nephrectomy (CRN) was historically a cornerstone in the management of metastatic RCC (mRCC), its role has been questioned following pivotal trials such as CARMENA and SURTIME. With the advent of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and targeted therapies, the contemporary relevance of CRN coupled with first-line immunotherapy and targeted therapy combination regimens warrants re-evaluation. Methods: This retrospective cohort study utilized the TriNetX research network to identify patients aged 18–90 years diagnosed with mRCC between 2005 and 2024 who received first-line systemic therapies. Patients were stratified into two cohorts based on receipt of CRN status within one year of diagnosis. Propensity score matching (1:1) was done to adjust baseline characteristics. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling were used to compare five-year overall survival between the groups. Results: Among 5960 eligible patients, 1776 (888 CRN matched to 888 who did not) formed the cohort of analysis. The CRN group demonstrated significantly higher five-year survival (57.7% vs. 45.0%, p < 0.0001) with a hazard ratio of 1.56 (95% CI: 1.33–1.83). Subgroup analyses showed consistent survival benefits across all four NCCN-recommended first-line regimens—Axitinib + Pembrolizumab: 64.0% (CRN) vs. 53.3% (no CRN), p = 0.01; Cabozantinib + Nivolumab: 50.1% vs. 40.4%, p = 0.004; Lenvatinib + Pembrolizumab: 37.4% vs. 22.8%, p = 0.012; Nivolumab + Ipilimumab: 56.4% vs. 46.1%, p = 0.005. Conclusions: In the era of modern immunotherapy and targeted agents, CRN remains associated with improved survival in patients with mRCC receiving NCCN-recommended first-line regimens. These findings support the continued evaluation of CRN as a component of multimodal therapy, particularly in patients with favorable risk profiles. Full article

The management of resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (R-PDAC) and borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR-PDAC) remains a topic of active debate. Although neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) has shown clinical benefits in BR-PDAC, especially in increasing resectability and achieving higher rates of margin-negative (R0) resections, its role in R-PDAC is less clearly defined. Additionally, the role of immunotherapy in PDAC is still being explored, with ongoing trials investigating new combinations to overcome the tumor’s immune-resistant microenvironment. This article provides a comprehensive narrative review of the current evidence comparing NAT with upfront surgery in pancreatic cancer management, focusing on randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses that assess outcomes in R-PDAC and BR-PDAC. The review aims to determine whether NAT offers a significant survival advantage over traditional post-operative strategies and to clarify which clinical scenarios may benefit most from NAT. The literature was identified through a systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases up to March 2025. Article selection adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. Our review of existing evidence supports NAT as the standard of care for BR-PDAC. Meanwhile, management of R-PDAC should be tailored individually, guided by risk stratification that considers both clinical parameters and molecular features. Immunotherapy and targeted therapies are still in early research phases, and their further integration as NAT remains controversial. Full article

Background: RiBi is integral to cell proliferation, and its dysregulation is increasingly recognized as a hallmark of aggressive cancers. We sought to develop and validate a composite “PanRibo-515 score” reflecting RiBi activity across multiple tumor types, assess its prognostic significance, and explore its relationship with immune checkpoint therapy outcomes. Methods: We curated 515 RiBi–associated genes (PanRibo-515) and used a LASSO regression-based strategy on a training dataset (GSE202203) to select the prognostically most relevant subset of 68 genes (OncoRibo-68). Directionality (positive or negative impact on survival) was assigned based on the sign of the LASSO coefficients. We integrated a forward selection approach to identify a refined subset of genes for computing the OncoRibo-68 score. For validation, patients in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were stratified into high or low OncoRibo-68 score groups for survival analyses. Additional validation for immunotherapy response was conducted using bioinformatic platforms used for immunotherapy response analysis. Results: A higher OncoRibo-68 score consistently correlated with poorer overall and progression-free survival across multiple cancers. Elevated OncoRibo-68 score was linked to an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment, but interestingly to increased response to checkpoint inhibitors. Conclusions: Our findings highlight RiBi as an important determinant of tumor aggressiveness and identify the OncoRibo-68 score as a promising biomarker for risk stratification and therapy selection. Future research may evaluate whether targeting RiBi pathways could enhance treatment efficacy, particularly in combination with immunotherapy. Full article

Although PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors have transformed cancer immunotherapy, a substantial proportion of patients derive no clinical benefit due to resistance driven by the tumour microenvironment (TME). Transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) is a key immunosuppressive cytokine implicated in this resistance. Several bifunctional antibodies that co-target PD-1 and TGF-β signalling have entered clinical trials and shown encouraging efficacy, but the mechanistic basis of their synergy is not fully understood. Here, we engineered 015s, a bifunctional fusion antibody that simultaneously targets murine PD-1 and TGF-β and evaluated its antitumour efficacy and mechanistic impact in pre-clinical models. Antibody 015s exhibited high affinity, dual target binding, and the effective inhibition of PD-1 and TGF-β signalling. In vivo, 015s significantly suppressed tumour growth compared with anti-mPD-1 or TGF-β receptor II (TGF-βRII) monotherapy. When combined with the CD24-targeted ADC, 015s produced even greater antitumour activity and achieved complete tumour regression. Mechanistic studies demonstrated that 015s significantly reduced tumour cell migration and invasion, reversed epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT), decreased microvascular density, and attenuated collagen deposition within the TME. Antibody 015s also decreased bioactive TGF-β1 and increased intratumoural IFN-γ, creating a more immunostimulatory milieu. These findings support further development of PD-1/TGF-β bifunctional antibodies for cancers with high TGF-β activity or limited response to immune checkpoint blockade. Full article

Immunotherapy has revolutionized cancer treatment. Despite its success across various malignancies, a significant proportion of patients either fail to respond (primary resistance) or relapse after an initial response (acquired resistance). This review explores the different mechanisms underlying resistance to immunotherapy, including tumor-intrinsic factors such as loss of antigen presentation, genetic, and epigenetic mutations. It also examines tumor-extrinsic contributors, such as immunosuppressive cells in the tumor microenvironment, checkpoint molecule upregulation, and microbiome influences. A comprehensive understanding of resistance mechanisms is essential for improving patient selection, developing combination therapies, and ultimately enhancing the efficacy and durability of immunotherapeutic interventions. Full article

Glioblastoma (GBM) remains one of the most aggressive and treatment-resistant brain tumors, largely due to its profound intratumoral heterogeneity and immunosuppressive microenvironment. Various classifications of GBM subtypes were created based on transcriptional and methylation profiles. This effort, followed by the development of new technology such as single-nuclei sequencing (snRNAseq) and spatial transcriptomics, led to a better understanding of the glioma cells’ plasticity and their ability to transition between diverse cellular states. GBM cells can mimic neurodevelopmental programs to resemble oligodendrocyte or neural progenitor behavior and hitchhike the local neuronal network to support their growth. The tumor microenvironment, especially under hypoxic conditions, drives the tumor cell clonal selection, which then reshapes the immune cells’ functions. These adaptations contribute to immune evasion by progressively disabling T cell and myeloid cell functions, ultimately establishing a highly immunosuppressive tumor milieu. This complex and metabolically constrained environment poses a major barrier to effective antitumor immunity and limits the success of conventional therapies. Understanding the dynamic interactions between glioma cells and their microenvironment is essential for the development of more effective immunotherapies and rational combination strategies aimed at overcoming resistance and improving patient outcomes. Full article

Head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs) represent a heterogeneous group of tumors with a complex molecular profile. Despite therapeutic advances, patient prognosis remains poor, emphasizing the need for more effective treatment strategies. Traditional chemotherapy, with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), remains the gold standard but is limited by toxicity and tumor resistance. Immunotherapy, particularly immune checkpoint inhibitors targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1), has improved overall survival, especially in patients with high PD-L1 expression. In parallel, targeted therapies such as poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1) inhibitors—which impair DNA repair and increase replication stress—have shown promising activity in HNSCC. Cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) inhibitors are also under investigation due to their potential to correct dysregulated cell cycle control, a hallmark of HNSCC. This review aims to summarize current and emerging pharmacotherapies for HNSCC, focusing on chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and PARP and CDK inhibitors. It also discusses the evolving role of targeted therapies in improving clinical outcomes. Future research directions include combination therapies, nanotechnology-based delivery systems to enhance treatment specificity, and the development of diagnostic tools such as PARP1-targeted imaging to better guide personalized treatment approaches. Full article

Background: Angiosarcomas (ASs) represent a heterogeneous and highly aggressive subset of tumors that respond poorly to systemic treatments and are associated with short progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The aim of this study was to develop and validate an immune-related prognostic model—termed the AS score—using data from two independent sarcoma cohorts. Methods: A prognostic model was developed using a previously characterized cohort of 25 angiosarcoma samples. Candidate genes were identified via the Maxstat algorithm (Maxstat v0.7-25 for R), combined with log-rank testing. The AS score was then computed by weighing normalized gene expression levels according to Cox regression coefficients. For external validation, transcriptomic data from TCGA Sarcoma cohort (n = 253) were analyzed. The Immunoscore—which reflects the tumor immune microenvironment—was inferred using the ESTIMATE package (v1.0.13) in R. All statistical analyses were performed in RStudio (v 4.0.3). Results: Four genes—IGF1R, MAP2K1, SERPINE1, and TCF12—were ultimately selected to construct the prognostic model. The resulting AS score enabled the classification of angiosarcoma cases into two prognostically distinct groups (p = 0.00012). Cases with high AS score values, which included both cutaneous and non-cutaneous forms, exhibited significantly poorer outcomes, whereas cases with low AS scores were predominantly cutaneous. A significant association was observed between the AS score and the Immunoscore (p = 0.025), with higher Immunoscore values found in high-AS score tumors. Validation using TCGA sarcoma cohort confirmed the prognostic value of both the AS score (p = 0.0066) and the Immunoscore (p = 0.0029), with a strong correlation between their continuous values (p = 2.9 × 10⁻⁸). Further survival analysis, integrating categorized scores into four groups, demonstrated robust prognostic significance (p = 0.00021). Notably, in tumors with a low Immunoscore, AS score stratification was not prognostic. In contrast, among cases with a high Immunoscore, the AS score effectively distinguished outcomes (p < 0.0001), identifying a subgroup with poor prognosis but potential sensitivity to immunotherapy. Conclusions: This combined classification using the AS score and Immunoscore has prognostic relevance in sarcoma, suggesting that angiosarcomas with an immunologically active microenvironment (high Immunoscore) and poor prognosis (high AS score) may be prime candidates for immunotherapy and this approach warrants prospective validation. Full article

Prostate cancer continues to be the most common cause of cancer-related disease and mortality among men worldwide, especially in the advanced stages, notably metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), which poses significant treatment challenges. Docetaxel, a widely used chemotherapeutic agent, has long served as the standard treatment, offering survival benefits and mitigation. However, its clinical impact is frequently undermined by the development of chemoresistance, which is a formidable challenge that leads to treatment failure and disease progression. The mechanisms driving docetaxel resistance are diverse and complex, encompassing modifications in androgen receptor signaling, drug efflux transporters, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), microtubule alterations, apoptotic pathway deregulation, and tumor microenvironmental influences. Recent evidence suggests that extracellular RNAs influence drug responses, further complicating the resistance landscape. This review offers a broad discussion on the mechanisms of resistance and explores novel therapeutic approaches to address them. These include next-generation taxanes, targeted molecular inhibitors, immunotherapies, and combination regimens that can be designed to counteract specific resistance pathways. By broadening our understanding of docetaxel resistance, this review highlights potential strategies to improve therapeutic efficacy and the potential to enhance outcomes in patients with advanced treatment-resistant prostate cancer. Full article

Background: Lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Advances in screening, diagnosis, and management have transformed clinical practice, particularly with the integration of immunotherapy and target therapies. Methods: A systematic literature search was carried out for the period between October 2016 to September 2024. Phase II and III randomized trials evaluating ICI monotherapy, ICI–chemotherapy combinations, and dual ICI regimens in patients with advanced NSCLC were included. Outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment-related adverse events (AEs). Results: PD-1-targeted therapies demonstrated superior OS compared to PD-L1-based regimens, with cemiplimab monotherapyranking highest for OS benefit (posterior probability: 90%), followed by sintilimab plus platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC) and pemetrexed—PBC. PFS atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and PBC, and camrelizumab plus PBC were the most effective regimens. ICI–chemotherapy combinations achieved higher ORRs but were associated with greater toxicity. The most favorable safety profiles were observed with cemiplimab, nivolumab, and avelumab monotherapy, while atezolizumab plus PBC and sugemalimab plus PBC carried the highest toxicity burdens. Conclusions: In PD-L1-unselected advanced NSCLC, PD-1 blockade—particularly cemiplimab monotherapy—and rationally designed ICI–chemotherapy combinations represent the most efficacious treatment strategies. Balancing efficacy with safety remains critical, especially in the absence of predictive biomarkers. These findings support a patient-tailored approach to immunotherapy and highlight the need for further biomarker-driven and real-world investigations to optimize treatment selection. Full article

Gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies are diverse and particularly challenging in terms of current immunotherapy but hold great opportunity for impact given that they constitute the highest cancer incidence and mortality rates worldwide. Traditional treatment options for solid GI malignancies include surgical intervention, chemotherapy, radiation, or a combination of these treatments. Emerging modalities within immunotherapy are anticipated to extend the results with conventional therapy by stimulating the patient’s own intrinsic potential for tumor-specific immunologic rejection. Combination regimens of chemotherapy and tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) therapy in advanced colorectal cancer and pancreatic cancer, autologous monocyte therapy in advanced gastric cancer, and CAR-T therapy trained against GI-selective tumor antigens such as carcinoembryonic antigen are currently being studied. Clinical trials are underway to study the combination of various chemotherapeutic agents along with immunotherapy in the management of cholangiocarcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and esophageal cancer. Alternative therapies are needed based on the tumor immune microenvironment, which can lead to a personalized approach to treatment. In this review, we discuss the current status of various modalities of immunotherapy in common GI malignancies, along with their mechanisms of immune activation and cancer suppression. We will also discuss the use of immunotherapy in less common solid GI malignancies and touch on recent advancements and clinical trials. Full article

The convergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and nanomedicine has transformed cancer vaccine development, particularly in optimizing RNA-loaded lipid nanoparticles (LNPs). Stability and targeted delivery are major obstacles to the clinical translation of promising RNA-LNP vaccines for cancer immunotherapy. This systematic review analyzes the AI’s impact on LNP engineering through machine learning-driven predictive models, generative adversarial networks (GANs) for novel lipid design, and neural network-enhanced biodistribution prediction. AI reduces the therapeutic development timeline through accelerated virtual screening of millions of lipid combinations, compared to conventional high-throughput screening. Furthermore, AI-optimized LNPs demonstrate improved tumor targeting. GAN-generated lipids show structural novelty while maintaining higher encapsulation efficiency; graph neural networks predict RNA-LNP binding affinity with high accuracy vs. experimental data; digital twins reduce lyophilization optimization from years to months; and federated learning models enable multi-institutional data sharing. We propose a framework to address key technical challenges: training data quality (min. 15,000 lipid structures), model interpretability (SHAP > 0.65), and regulatory compliance (21CFR Part 11). AI integration reduces manufacturing costs and makes personalized cancer vaccine affordable. Future directions need to prioritize quantum machine learning for stability prediction and edge computing for real-time formulation modifications. Full article

Theranostic materials, which combine therapeutic and diagnostic capabilities, represent a promising advancement in cancer treatment by improving both the precision and personalization of therapies. Recently, metal peroxides (MePOs) have attracted significant interest from researchers for their potential use in both cancer diagnosis and therapy. This review provides an overview of recent developments in the application of MePOs for innovative cancer treatment strategies. The unique properties of MePOs, such as oxygen generation, are highlighted for their potential to improve therapeutic outcomes, especially in hypoxic tumor microenvironments. Initially, methods for MePO synthesis are briefly discussed, including hydrolyzation–precipitation, reversed-phase microemulsion, and sonochemical techniques, emphasizing the role of surfactants in regulating the particle size and enhancing bioactivity. Next, we discuss the main therapeutic approaches where MePOs have shown promise. These applications include chemotherapy, photodynamic therapy (PDT), immunotherapy, and radiation therapy. Overall, we focus on integrating MePOs into theranostic platforms to enhance cancer treatment and enable diagnostic imaging for improved clinical outcomes. Finally, we discuss potential future research directions that could lead to clinical translation and the development of advanced medicines. Full article