Search Results (548)

Agricultural AI agents play a crucial role in the evolution of smart agriculture, from single-point automated applications to intelligent systems driven by tasks, collaborative decision-making, and closed-loop execution. However, their practical implementation still faces key challenges, such as heterogeneous agricultural data processing, insufficient cross-scenario generalization ability, complexity of multi-agent collaboration, difficulties in integrating software and hardware, and insufficient security and trust guarantees in real agricultural environments. This paper presents a systematic review of the architecture design, business processes, key technologies, and future challenges of agricultural AI agents. Agricultural AI agents are classified into two types: virtual agricultural AI agents and embodied agricultural AI agents. The paper summarizes a four-layer system architecture consisting of the infrastructure layer, agent management layer, agent collaboration layer, and application layer. The paper also analyzes the model capabilities required by agricultural AI agents from four typical business dimensions: perception and state understanding, knowledge memory and experience management, reasoning decision-making and task planning, and collaborative execution and resource scheduling. This research shows that technologies such as multimodal perception, knowledge graphs, retrieval-enhanced generation, digital twins, reinforcement learning, and multi-agent collaboration can provide important support for agricultural AI agents to enhance their environmental understanding, knowledge reuse, autonomous decision-making, and physical execution capabilities. Future research should focus on robust perception in open environments, long-term memory and knowledge evolution, reliable multi-agent collaboration, edge-cloud collaborative deployment, and secure and trustworthy human–machine collaboration. Integrating agricultural domain knowledge with intelligent agent technology is an important direction for promoting the large-scale, adaptive, and sustainable application of agricultural AI agents. Full article

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become a central driver of transformation in innovation management, reshaping how organizations design strategies, develop offerings, and generate knowledge. This study examines how innovation management has evolved from the pre-ChatGPT era—characterized by analytics, automation, and decision support—to the post-ChatGPT period, marked by the widespread adoption of generative AI (GenAI) and human–AI collaboration. Using a structured literature review of Scopus-indexed studies published between 2020 and 2025, the paper identifies the following six dominant thematic dimensions of AI-enabled innovation management: strategic and business model innovation, product and service innovation, sustainability-oriented innovation, organizational agility and capabilities, human-centric innovation, and knowledge, learning, and research. The findings reveal a conceptual shift from efficiency-driven applications toward more creative, strategic, and collaborative uses of AI, with generative models acting as co-creators rather than mere analytical tools. The study contributes by synthesizing the fragmented literature into an integrative framework that captures this transition and by highlighting emerging research gaps, particularly in sustainability and human-centered innovation. Practical implications for managers and policymakers are discussed. Full article

Across four decades of AI deployment, the same six human challenges (trust calibration, reliance behavior, cognitive engagement, skill retention, accountability, and transparency) recur, yet fragmentation across research communities obscures this continuity and limits knowledge transfer. Functionally similar phenomena are repeatedly relabeled (a jangle fallacy): what aviation researchers call “automation complacency,” decision scientists call “algorithm appreciation,” and LLM researchers describe as “over-reliance.” This systematic review synthesizes 152 papers spanning aviation, healthcare, manufacturing/supply chain, and cross-domain contexts across three AI technology generations: decision support systems, autonomous systems, and large language model (LLM) agents. We introduce the Collaboration Convergence Framework (CCF), a 6 × 3 matrix with solution-maturity indicators that maps each challenge across generations. The framework shows that Gen 3 designers can transfer decades of evidence from automation and decision support research (particularly reliance calibration, cognitive forcing, and skill maintenance) rather than rediscovering them. Cross-generational synthesis also isolates three Gen 3 phenomena without direct precedent in earlier generations: epistemia (attributing genuine knowledge to LLMs based on surface fluency), attribution ambiguity in co-creation, and motivational withdrawal. We distill twelve transferable design principles and propose ten research directions, prioritizing skill-retention interventions and accountability frameworks. These findings carry direct sustainability implications aligned with Industry 5.0: protecting workforce capability under increasing automation (SDG 8), reducing duplicated research effort through cross-generational knowledge reuse (SDG 9), and supporting responsible deployment by treating collaboration risks as predictable rather than novel (SDG 12). The CCF provides conceptual infrastructure for cumulative learning across AI generations and industries. Full article

Artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly permeates organizational work, yet research on AI–human collaboration remains fragmented and lacks a unified structure. This study provides a comprehensive bibliometric mapping of AI–human collaboration by examining its intellectual foundations and emerging research fronts across multiple disciplines. Using document co-citation and bibliographic coupling analysis, the study examines how research on AI–human collaboration has evolved and where it is heading. Data were collected from the Scopus database. A total of 2178 primary documents and 15,078 secondary documents were retrieved and analyzed using VOSviewer (1.6.20) software to visualize the thematic interconnectedness. Results from document co-citation revealed five significant research clusters underlying AI–human collaboration research, including psychological and social foundations of AI; organizational applications of AI in higher education; ethical–cognitive foundations of generative AI; AI literacy and educational transformation; and behavioral foundations of AI adoption. The bibliometric coupling results identified four active research fronts: AI governance, ethics, and humanization; AI–customer relationship management (CRM) adoption, capabilities, and organizational performance; anthropomorphic AI and consumer emotional response; and AI conversational agents and consumer experience dynamics. These findings suggest a thematic shift from technology-centered automation toward collaborative and human-centered integration. The study contributes theoretically by synthesizing insights across organizational behavior, psychology, and information systems to clarify the intellectual structure of this emerging domain. It also outlines implications for leaders designing AI-enabled workplaces that prioritize collaboration, ethical alignment, and adaptive capacity. Full article

The optimisation design of agricultural machinery is shifting from offline, experience-driven engineering towards adaptive, data-driven, and closed-loop intelligent optimisation. Conventional approaches based on computer-aided engineering (CAE), empirical testing, mathematical modelling, and static multi-objective optimisation have provided an important engineering foundation, but they remain limited under unstructured field conditions involving soil heterogeneity, crop variability, climatic disturbance, and nonlinear machinery–environment interactions. This review systematically examines the evolution of intelligent optimisation design for agricultural machinery from conventional simulation-based methods to artificial intelligence (AI)- and digital twin (DT)-enabled paradigms. First, mathematical modelling, response surface methodology, discrete element method (DEM), computational fluid dynamics (CFD), multi-body dynamics (MBD), heuristic algorithms, and early AI-assisted surrogate optimisation are reviewed to clarify their contributions and limitations. Second, frontier enabling technologies are analysed, including agriculture-specific large models, generative AI, lightweight edge intelligence, deep reinforcement learning (DRL), embodied AI, federated learning (FL), and privacy-preserving computing. Third, system-level applications integrating DT and AI are discussed, with emphasis on full-lifecycle machinery optimisation, device–edge–cloud collaborative control, multi-agent fleet coordination, predictive maintenance, and Agriculture 5.0-oriented intelligent equipment systems. Key deployment bottlenecks are further identified, including sim-to-real inconsistency, virtual–physical mismatch in DTs, edge-side trade-offs among accuracy, latency, energy consumption, and cost, insufficient validation standards, and economic adoption barriers. Finally, a 2025–2030 roadmap is proposed, highlighting large-model–DT closed loops, control biomimetics, green low-carbon optimisation, and trustworthy human–machine symbiosis for sustainable Agriculture 5.0. Full article

This systematic review comprehensively explores the integration of Extended Reality (XR) technologies, comprising Virtual Reality (VR), Augmented Reality (AR), and Mixed Reality (MR), into New Zealand’s STEM education framework. In alignment with PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we systematically analyzed 127 peer-reviewed studies from the Web of Science (n = 48), Scopus (n = 57), and Dimensions (n = 22) and incorporated 15 grey literature sources, resulting in 142 studies included in the review. Our meta-analysis found substantial improvements in student conceptual understanding from XR-enhanced STEM modules. Specifically, we observed an average increase of 23.4% when compared to traditional instructional methods (95 percent Confidence Interval: 18.7 to 28.1 percent, p < 0.001). These gains were especially prominent in interactive learning environments where immersive XR applications supported deeper engagement and the visualization of abstract STEM concepts. The qualitative synthesis highlighted several key barriers that limit effective XR integration. These include technological infrastructure gaps reported in 68 percent of reviewed studies, a critical need for educator training cited by 82 percent of studies, and curriculum alignment issues present in 57 percent of cases. Methodological quality was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) 2018, and the qualitative component employed a deductive thematic coding approach with inter-coder reliability verification. Successful institutional implementations were also identified. At Auckland University of Technology, XR-supported courses produced a 67 percent increase in student engagement, while Wellington High School achieved a 41 percent reduction in STEM achievement gaps through targeted XR interventions. Based on the evidence, we propose a four-phase implementation framework that addresses the technological, pedagogical, and policy requirements for sustainable XR adoption. These findings highlight the role of immersive technologies in supporting human-centered digital transformation and future skills development in the transition to Industry 5.0. The review contributes evidence-based insights that support the transition from technology-driven approaches associated with Industry 4.0 to the human-centered, socially oriented priorities of Industry 5.0. It also identifies critical research gaps, particularly in long-term learning outcomes and the integration of Mātauranga Māori within XR-enabled STEM environments. Full article

Traditional talent development models were designed before the AI revolution and do not consider artificial agents as possible sources of development. artificial intelligence is quickly infiltrating education spaces—but our thinking about learning has not caught up with how we can productively pair learners with both human and artificial intelligence. Addressing this gap, we introduce Human–AI Symbiotic Theory (HAIST), a novel theoretical framework designed for AI-facilitated environments, which posits how learners can productively leverage both humans and AI as “development partners” across the entire talent development process. We begin with a comprehensive integration of ideas and theory from the literature on talent development, AI for learning, and human–AI collaboration and use these insights to build HAIST for the specific context of talent development. HAIST comprises three mechanisms—Complementary Intelligence Activation (CIA), Dynamic Adaptive Co-Regulation (DACR), and Agency-Preserving Scaffolding (APS)—that are grounded in prior theory and research on topics like sociocultural theory, self-regulated learning, and distributed cognition. We then demonstrate how HAIST can be applied throughout all phases of talent development while highlighting implications for traditionally underserved learners like adult learners, student veterans, multilingual learners, and first-generation learners. We provide an applied example of how the three mechanisms work in tandem to support talent development and discuss points of tension that must be navigated when applying HAIST (e.g., between adaptation and optimization vs. agency). Lastly, we highlight how considerations of ethics and learner rights (algorithmic bias, learner voice, etc.) should be considered when operationalizing HAIST. Overall, HAIST can serve as a foundational theory to not only understand how talent development should occur between learners and both humans and AI, but also to consider the process of instruction design in AI-mediated learning environments. Full article

Vulnerability management (VM) is becoming increasingly important as organizations face growing cybersecurity threats. This study examines how organizations adapt their vulnerability management routines in response to evolving vulnerability signals through the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and automation. Drawing on data from an international fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG) company, we investigate how human expertise and AI interact across the full VM process, from triage to remediation. Using Organizational Routine Theory (ORT), we show that AI does not simply automate tasks but acts as a co-performer, influencing how decisions are made, work is coordinated, and actions are adapted. We develop a three-phase model capturing (1) the integration of AI-enabled automation into strained routines, (2) the manifestation of tensions between human expertise and automation as well as between usability and system complexity, and (3) the stabilization of hybrid routines through iterative adaptation and feedback loops. We identify two key tensions in this process: technology versus human expertise, and usability versus the complexity of multi-vendor tools. These tensions create frictions in practice but also open opportunities for learning and improvement. Rather than treating AI as a technical tool, our findings highlight its role as an active routine participant. Importantly, we show that routine evolution enables organizations to improve how vulnerability signals are interpreted and acted upon, thereby supporting more coordinated and adaptive cybersecurity practices. This has both theoretical implications for understanding how routines evolve with technology and practical relevance for improving adaptive cybersecurity practices. By linking micro-level routine dynamics to broader organizational outcomes, this study contributes to explaining how organizations sustain stable and adaptive operations under conditions of continuous cyber threat exposure. Full article

Article discusses Digital Twins (DTs) as a solution for artificial intelligence (AI)-based modeling and metrology in Industry 5.0 and Industry 6.0 manufacturing systems. DTs enable the creation of real-time virtual replicas of physical assets, processes, and systems, increasing transparency, prediction, and optimization in manufacturing environments. By integrating AI, machine learning (ML), and advanced sensor data, DT support adaptive, self-learning production models capable of responding to dynamic operating conditions. In metrology, DTs improve measurement accuracy, traceability, and quality assurance by continuously synchronizing data between the physical and virtual domains. This technology improves process simulation, predictive maintenance, and fault detection, reducing downtime and operating costs. Furthermore, DTs facilitate human-centric production by enabling collaborative decision-making between intelligent systems and skilled workers. Their role in sustainable production is significant, supporting energy optimization, waste reduction, and lifecycle performance analysis. In Industry 6.0, DTs go beyond cyber-physical integration to encompass cognitive intelligence, ethical automation, and autonomous optimization. However, challenges remain in data interoperability, cybersecurity, model scalability, and real-time computational performance. DTs represent a revolutionary framework for the development of intelligent, resilient, and precise manufacturing ecosystems in next-generation industrial systems. Full article

Higher education institutions (HEIs) are rapidly developing to meet Industry 5.0 demands, highlighting human–machine collaboration, sustainability, and institutional resilience. Existing literature primarily explores artificial intelligence (AI), learning analytics (LA), and sustainability as discrete components within HEI. Limited studies examine how these disciplines intersect to impact institutional developments, especially from the perspective of strategic decision-making. Hence, this research explores how HEI leaders perceive the integration of artificial intelligence, learning analytics, and sustainability within strategic planning. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 29 leaders from diverse HEIs using the Technology–Organization–Environment (TOE) and the Triple Bottom Line (TBL) theory frameworks. Thematic analysis demonstrated that AI and LA improve efficiency and decision-making but face ethical and cultural obstacles, while sustainability is often fragmented despite its reputational value. The results highlight a lack of holistic integration across domains. This research suggests theoretical and practical insights for aligning innovation and sustainable principles to build agile, ethically grounded, and future-ready universities. Full article

Financial markets are characterized by non-stationarity, regime shifts, and complex cross-asset interactions, which challenge traditional portfolio optimization and motivate reinforcement learning (RL) for adaptive decision-making. However, many RL-based approaches remain predominantly return-centric, with risk, uncertainty, and human oversight only weakly integrated, limiting robustness and practical applicability. This review provides a critical synthesis of risk-aware and uncertainty-sensitive reinforcement learning for portfolio optimization from a human–AI collaboration perspective. We analyze major architectural paradigms—including single-agent, hierarchical, multi-agent, and modular systems—together with risk modeling strategies (e.g., reward shaping, constraint-based optimization, and downside risk measures such as CVaR) and probabilistic approaches to uncertainty estimation (e.g., Bayesian neural networks, Monte Carlo dropout, and ensembles). A structured analysis of 57 fully assessed studies reveals that only 5 (9%) explicitly couple uncertainty estimation with risk constraint mechanisms, while 38 (69%) treat risk and uncertainty as structurally independent components. We identify a central structural limitation: risk objectives are rarely conditioned on epistemic uncertainty, while uncertainty estimates seldom influence constraint mechanisms or capital allocation. This decoupling leads to fragmented frameworks that remain difficult to deploy in real financial environments. By integrating architectural design, risk modeling, uncertainty estimation, and evaluation practices, this review proposes a unified, deployment-oriented perspective for developing governance-aligned portfolio decision-support systems. Full article

This paper advances a theoretical argument that generative AI is accelerating the democratization of computational thinking and, in turn, reshaping education, professional practice, and the nature of computing itself. Traditionally, computational thinking has been closely tied to learning to program, thereby limiting who could effectively employ it. The emergence of large language models (LLMs) challenges this linkage by decoupling many forms of computational problem solving from direct programming. In response to this shift, the paper explores the implications for curriculum design and workforce roles through a theoretical and interpretive lens. Drawing on prior literature, historical context, and illustrative examples from recent scholarship and practice, we develop a conceptual account of AI-augmented computing. We argue that LLMs lower barriers to entry by abstracting away much of manual coding and reallocating effort toward problem framing, prompt engineering, oversight, and validation. We further argue that this transition is redistributing computational skills across disciplines, positioning prompt engineering as an emerging engineering practice, and increasing pressure on universities to redesign curricula around AI literacy, fluency, and mastery. Full article

Intelligent automation is a core component of Industry 4.0, enabling artificial intelligence (AI) systems to support or execute operational and managerial decisions in real time. In high-risk industrial environments such as mining and metallurgy, real-time decision-making improves efficiency but also raises critical challenges related to trust, explainability, human oversight, and institutional accountability. This study proposes PRIME–INSPECT, a two-layer socio-technical framework designed to support trustworthy AI-driven real-time decision-making. The PRIME (predict, regulate, interpret, mitigate, execute) layer formalizes the operational decision flow, embedding control mechanisms, uncertainty quantification, and explainability into the automation pipeline. The INSPECT (integrity, navigability, supervisory control, policy maturity, ethical compliance, collaboration, trust calibration) layer defines the organizational and governance conditions required for safe deployment. The framework is conceptually developed through a structured literature synthesis and supported by exploratory empirical grounding through stakeholder perceptions from IT and top management participants, alongside an illustrative industrial use case intended to demonstrate conceptual applicability rather than engineering performance validation. The findings highlight the importance of aligning operational AI processes with institutional safeguards to support calibrated trust and responsible automation. The empirical component is intended to provide conceptual and organizational grounding of framework dimensions rather than quantitative validation of predictive performance. PRIME–INSPECT provides a structured architecture for designing and governing AI-enabled real-time decision systems in high-risk industrial contexts. Full article

The growing reliance on artificial intelligence (AI)-based recommendation systems is transforming e-commerce into a space where decision-making is increasingly co-constructed between users and intelligent systems. However, it remains insufficiently understood how the transparency of these systems influences users’ trust and purchasing decisions within human–AI collaboration contexts. Addressing this gap, the study develops a conceptual model that explains the role of cognitive mechanisms in the relationship between AI transparency and consumer behavior. Specifically, algorithmic understanding and fairness perception are conceptualized as cognitive processes through which users evaluate AI-generated recommendations, while perceived control is positioned as a key link between these evaluations and trust formation. The model is empirically tested using partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) based on data collected from 312 users of recommender systems. The results highlight the role of cognitive mechanisms and perceived control in explaining the effects of AI transparency on trust and, indirectly, on purchase intention. AI literacy also shapes how users interpret the information provided by the system. The present research provides an integrated perspective on human–AI collaboration in e-commerce, with relevant implications for the design of recommender systems and the optimization of user experience. Full article

This study investigates how varying levels of display transparency in an AI system affect human performance, cognitive workload, and trust in a collaborative human–AI task. (1) Background: As AI-assisted systems become increasingly prevalent, understanding how transparency shapes human cognition and trust is critical for effective ergonomic design. The literature presents conflicting findings regarding whether greater AI transparency reduces or redistributes cognitive demand and whether it consistently enhances trust. (2) Methods: Twenty participants completed a Pictionary-style drawing task under two counterbalanced display transparency conditions—low transparency (Top-1 AI prediction) and high transparency (Top-5 predictions with similarity scores). Objective performance, eye-movement data, NASA-TLX workload ratings, and multi-dimensional trust questionnaires were collected. Condition-level measures were analyzed using a mixed ANOVA framework with non-parametric confirmatory tests where normality assumptions were violated. (3) Results: Increased transparency significantly enhanced visual attention to AI information. However, neither subjective workload nor trust showed statistically significant differences between conditions. Task completion time and error rates were likewise unaffected. Directional trends favored higher transparency for competence-related trust dimensions, though these did not reach significance. (4) Conclusions: Rather than simply reducing cognitive burden, display transparency may redistribute cognitive effort—replacing interpretive uncertainty with integrative processing demands. These findings suggest that display transparency alone is insufficient to produce measurable improvements in workload or trust, and that richer forms of explanatory transparency are needed to meaningfully support human–AI collaboration. Design implications for collaborative AI interfaces are discussed. Full article