Search Results (29,124)

This article presents a case study from a Social and Health Care School in Denmark, where a rooftop garden was designed to promote student health and support nature-based teaching across subject areas. A novel aspect of the project is the formal integration of the garden into teaching, implying that its long-term impact may extend beyond the students to the end-users they will later encounter in nursing homes and hospitals nationwide. This study applies the Evidence-Based Health Design in Landscape Architecture (EBHDL) process model, encompassing evidence collection, programming, and concept design, with the University of Copenhagen acting in a consultancy role. A co-design process with students and teachers was included as a novel source of case-specific evidence. Methodologically, this is a participatory practice-based case study focusing on the full design and construction processes, combining continuous documentation with reflective analysis of ‘process insights,’ generating lessons learned from the application of the EBHDL process model. This study identifies two categories of lessons learned. First, general insights emerged concerning governance, stakeholder roles, and the critical importance of site selection, procurement, and continuity of design responsibility. Second, specific insights were gained regarding the application of the EBHDL model, including its alignment with Danish and international standardised construction phases. These insights are particularly relevant for project managers in nature-based initiatives. The results also show how the EBHDL model aligns with Danish and international standardised construction phases, offering a bridge between health design methods and established building practice. The case focuses on the EBHDL process rather than verified outcomes and demonstrates how evidence-based and participatory approaches can help structure complex design processes, facilitate stakeholder engagement, and support decision-making in institutional projects. Full article

As population aging accelerates, the mounting burden on informal family caregivers in areas lacking formal care systems threatens the sustainability of elder care. This study aims at evaluating how the rural living environment and external connectivity jointly alleviate caregiver burden and exploring whether regional accessibility serves as a substitute for local infrastructure deficits. Guided by Ecological Systems Theory, we analyzed a cross-sectional dataset of 327 matched caregiver-recipient dyads from rural China using multivariate regression and mediation models. Results indicate that a favorable local environment reduces burden both directly and indirectly through improved recipient health. Crucially, county-level accessibility moderates this relationship via a substitution effect, where the marginal relief from local environmental improvements is most potent in isolated areas but diminishes where external access is convenient. Dimension-specific analyses show that developmental and physical strains are particularly sensitive to these factors. We conclude that sustaining informal care requires a dual-pathway strategy: prioritizing local “soft” assets like community safety and cultural activities while enhancing regional connectivity to service hubs. Ultimately, this research provides empirical evidence and a theoretical framework for enhancing rural informal care sustainability through environmental optimization, thereby advancing Sustainable Development Goals regarding health, reduced inequalities, and sustainable communities. Full article

Fault diagnosis in the power systems of Hybrid Electric Vehicles (HEVs) is crucial for ensuring vehicle safety and energy efficiency. This study proposes an innovative CNN-LSTM fusion model for diagnosing common faults in HEV power systems, such as battery degradation, inverter anomalies, and motor failures. The model integrates the feature extraction capabilities of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) with the temporal dependency handling of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks. Through data preprocessing, model training, and validation, the approach achieves high-precision fault identification. Experimental results demonstrate an accuracy rate exceeding 95% on simulated datasets, outperforming traditional machine learning methods. This research provides a practical framework for HEV fault diagnosis and explores its potential in real-world applications. Full article

Despite the increasing number of older Syrian refugees in Canada, little is known about how they manage their health care needs while contending with language barriers, cultural dissonance, and systemic inequities. This qualitative study explored how older Syrian refugees in the Greater Toronto Area (GTA) navigate healthcare across Canadian and transnational contexts. The study was guided by the transnational circulation of care framework and used an interpretive descriptive design. Following research ethics approval, 20 older Syrian refugees were interviewed by bilingual research assistants. In-depth individual interviews were conducted in Arabic and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. Four interrelated themes emerged: (1) Navigating a New System; (2) Living in Two Worlds; (3) Medication Portability, Herbal Practices, and Supplement Culture; and (4) Digital Health Across Borders. Findings demonstrate that older Syrian refugees actively construct hybrid care pathways that integrate biomedical, cultural, and transnational practices. These strategies reflect resilience and adaptability but also expose gaps in the healthcare system. The study underscores the need for culturally responsive and age-friendly healthcare practices that acknowledge transnational realities. By illuminating how care circulates across borders, this study provides actionable guidance for designing responsive health systems. Full article

Background: Obstructive sleep apnea is characterized by recurrent upper airway obstruction during sleep, leading to intermittent hypoxemia, sleep fragmentation, and excessive daytime sleepiness. Affecting up to 11% of the adult Polish population and more commonly diagnosed in men, OSA poses a major public health concern due to its association with cardiovascular, metabolic, and neurocognitive complications. This review summarizes the current evidence on diagnostic methods, risk factors, and therapeutic approaches, with particular emphasis on oral appliance therapy using mandibular advancement devices (MADs). Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted using the PubMed and Scopus databases, covering publications from 2020 to 2025, including clinical trials, meta-analyses, and systematic reviews evaluating the efficacy and safety of MAD therapy. Results: Findings demonstrate that MAD effectively reduces apnea–hypopnea index (AHI) values, improves oxygen saturation, and alleviates snoring and daytime fatigue, offering a patient-tolerable alternative for those intolerant to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). However, long-term use may cause occlusal or dental changes. Novel techniques, such as Er:YAG laser therapy, show potential in treating mild OSA. Moreover, epidemiological data suggest a correlation between tooth loss and an increased risk of OSA, particularly among men over 65. Conclusions: Dentists play a pivotal role in early detection, screening, and interdisciplinary management of OSA, underscoring the importance of collaboration between dental professionals and sleep medicine specialists for comprehensive care. Full article

Artificial intelligence (AI) is now embedded across many aspects of healthcare, yet most implementations remain fragmented, task-specific, and layered onto legacy workflows. This paper does not review AI applications in healthcare per se; instead, it examines what an AI-first healthcare system would look like, one in which AI functions as a foundational organizing principle of care delivery rather than an adjunct technology. We synthesize evidence across ambulatory, inpatient, diagnostic, post-acute, and population health settings to assess where AI capabilities are sufficiently mature to support system-level integration and where critical gaps remain. Across domains, the literature demonstrates strong performance for narrowly defined tasks such as imaging interpretation, documentation support, predictive surveillance, and remote monitoring. However, evidence for longitudinal orchestration, cross-setting integration, and sustained impact on outcomes, costs, and equity remains limited. Key barriers include data fragmentation, workflow misalignment, algorithmic bias, insufficient governance, and lack of prospective, multi-site evaluations. We argue that advancing toward AI-first healthcare requires shifting evaluation from accuracy-centric metrics to system-level outcomes, emphasizing human-enabled AI, interoperability, continuous learning, and equity-aware design. Using hypertension management and patient journey exemplars, we illustrate how AI-first systems can enable proactive risk stratification, coordinated intervention, and continuous support across the care continuum. We further outline architectural and governance requirements, including cloud-enabled infrastructure, interoperability, operational machine learning practices, and accountability frameworks—necessary to operationalize AI-first care safely and at scale, subject to prospective validation, regulatory oversight, and post-deployment surveillance. This review contributes a system-level framework for understanding AI-first healthcare, identifies priority research and implementation gaps, and offers practical considerations for clinicians, health systems, researchers, and policymakers. By reframing AI as infrastructure rather than isolated tools, the AI-first approach provides a pathway toward more proactive, coordinated, and equitable healthcare delivery while preserving the central role of human judgment and trust. Full article

Background: Early surgical intervention is associated with improved outcomes in hip fracture care, yet in patients using Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACs), surgery is frequently delayed due to concerns about increased intraoperative bleeding. Despite the increasing prevalence of hip fracture patients on DOACs, no consensus exists on optimal surgical timing. This has led to substantial practice variation between hospitals, with some operating within 24 h of last DOAC intake and others delaying surgery beyond 24 h. This study hypothesizes that early surgery within 24 h results in a non-inferior blood transfusion risk compared to delayed surgery 24 h or more after last DOAC intake in hip fracture patients on DOACs. This protocol describes the design and methodological rationale of a natural experiment. Methods and analysis: A multicenter cohort study designed as a natural experiment will be conducted across seven Dutch level 2 trauma centers, using predefined and standardized prospectively collected variables from electronic health records. Centers will adhere to distinct local surgical timing protocols, forming two cohorts: early surgery within 24 h and delayed surgery 24 h or more after last DOAC intake. Patients presenting with an isolated hip fracture who are using a DOAC and have taken their last dose within 24 h before admission will be included. The primary endpoint is postoperative blood transfusion. Secondary endpoints include additional bleeding-related outcomes, thrombotic and postoperative complications, and hospital length of stay. The primary analysis will be conducted on a per-protocol basis, with an intention-to-treat analysis performed as a supplementary assessment. Non-inferiority will be established if the upper bound of the one-sided 95% confidence interval for the risk difference does not exceed the predefined margin of 5%. Ethics and dissemination: Ethical approval was obtained from the Medical Ethics Committee United, Utrecht, The Netherlands. As this is a cohort study without altering clinical care, individual informed consent is not required. All data will be pseudonymized, and findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences. Registration details: Medical Ethics Committee United, Utrecht, The Netherlands, registration number W25.034 Full article

Background and Objectives: Access to anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) varies substantially across health systems, yet national-level data from Eastern Europe remain limited. This study provides the first nationwide, regionally stratified assessment of ACLR activity in Romania, examining geographic variation, socioeconomic and workforce determinants, and inequality. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of all ACLRs reported in the national administrative hospital database (2017–2023), supplemented with demographic, GDP, and workforce statistics. Outomes included incidence per 100,000 population, private-sector share, and sex distribution. Regional differences were tested using Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn post hoc comparisons. Predictors of ACLR incidence and private-sector utilization were identified through multivariable Poisson and logistic models. Inequality metrics (Gini coefficients, P90/P10 ratios) and sensitivity analyses excluding Bucharest–Ilfov were also performed. Results: A total of 11, 080 ACLRs were recorded. Incidence varied markedly across regions, from a median of 40.0 per 100,000 in Bucharest–Ilfov to <1–3 per 100,000 in the South, South-East, and South-West (p < 0.001). Higher GDP per capita correlated with incidence (ρ = 0.36) and explained 45% of its variance. Private-sector involvement ranged from <5% in Bucharest–Ilfov and the South to 80–100% in the Centre, North-West, and South-East. In adjusted Poisson models, GDP, surgeon availability, and private-sector share were strong independent predictors of incidence (all p < 0.001). Private-sector access was primarily determined by the proportion of private orthopedic surgeons (OR 21.03). National inequality was extreme (Gini 0.842–0.752; P90/P10 > 10⁹), reflecting the concentration of procedures within a small number of counties. Results were consistent across sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: ACLR in Romania displays severe territorial inequities driven by socioeconomic development, workforce distribution, and uneven private-sector capacity. Targeted regional investment and coordinated workforce strategies are necessary to improve equitable access to surgical care. Full article

The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 posed a great global threat and emphasized the urgent need for diagnostic tools that are rapid, reliable, sensitive and capable of real-time monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 infections. Recent investigations have identified a potential connection between SARS-CoV-2 infection and gut dysbiosis, highlighting the sophisticated interplay between the virus and the host microbiome. This review article discusses the eminence of nanobiosensors, as state-of-the-art tools, to investigate and clarify the connection between SARS-CoV-2 pathogenesis and gut microbiome imbalance. Nanobiosensors are uniquely advantageous owing to their sensitivity, selectivity, specificity, and reliable monitoring capabilities, making them well-suited for identifying both viral particles and microbial markers in biological samples. We explored a range of nanobiosensor platforms and their potential use for concurrently monitoring the gut dysbiosis induced by different pathological conditions. Additionally, we explore how advanced sensing technologies can shed light on the mechanisms driving virus-induced dysbiosis, and the implications for disease progression and patient outcomes. The integration of nanobiosensors with microfluidic devices and artificial intelligence algorithms has also been explored, highlighting the potential of developing point-of-care diagnostic tools that provide comprehensive insights into both viral infection and gut health. Utilizing nanotechnology, scientists and healthcare professionals may gain a more profound insight into the complex interaction dynamics between SARS-CoV-2 infection and the gut microenvironment. This could pave the way for enhanced diagnostic and prognostic approaches, treatment courses, and patient care for COVID-19. Full article

Background: Nurses’ clinical reasoning is increasingly being recognized as a core competence that enhances the quality and safety of care across diverse healthcare settings. Nurses with refined clinical reasoning skills contribute significantly to improved health outcomes and broader health gains. In emergency departments, this competence is essential to rapidly assessing complex problems, anticipating complications, and preventing the deterioration of patients’ clinical conditions. Such expertise enables nurses to discern the severity of clinical situations quickly and intervene effectively. Objectives: The aims of this study were to analyze the clinical reasoning process of nurses and develop a theory that explains this process in emergency care settings. Methodology: This qualitative study explored the following research question: “How do nurses enact the clinical reasoning process in emergency departments?” The Grounded Theory methodology was used, with a theoretical sample of 20 nurses. Data collection methods included in-depth interviews, participant observation, and field notes. Results: The theoretical analysis identified clinical reasoning as a substantive theory composed of two subprocesses: Diagnostic Nursing Assessment and Therapeutic Nursing Intervention. Nurses’ clinical reasoning determines two levels of patient severity—Level I, life-threatening situations (immediate risk), and Level II, non-life-threatening situations (expressed problems)—according to which nursing interventions are adjusted. Conclusions: The Nursing Clinical Reasoning Model is a dynamic and continuous process that involves both Diagnostic Nursing Assessment and Nursing Therapeutic Intervention. It is deeply rooted in the nurse–patient–family relationship and is shaped by the specific care context, which influences nurses’ assessments and interventions and patients’ responses and behaviors. Full article

Background/Objectives: Cardiac remodeling post-myocardial infarction is a critical process determining patient prognosis. Poland’s Coordinated Specialist Care program enables early cardiac rehabilitation (CSC-Infarct) during peak remodeling period. This study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of very early cardiac rehabilitation initiated during peak remodeling (mean 16.8 ± 3.4 days post- ST-elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI]) within the CSC-Infarct program. We examined outcomes following two training modalities—interval and continuous—applied according to clinical guidelines based on baseline exercise capacity. Methods: We enrolled 288 patients (135 women, 153 men, age 59.7 ± 9.8 years) after first STEMI into a 24-day rehabilitation program (5 sessions/week) within CSC-Infarct. Patients received either interval training (n = 127) or continuous training (n = 161) according to National Health Fund protocols. Hemodynamic, metabolic (metabolic equivalents [MET], maximal oxygen uptake [VO2max]), and functional parameters (6-minute walk test [6MWT]) were assessed pre- and post-rehabilitation. Results: Both groups showed significant improvement in most parameters. The continuous training group achieved higher final MET values (8.9 ± 2.5 vs. 6.5 ± 1.9; p < 0.001), VO₂max (31.0 ± 8.8 vs. 22.9 ± 6.5 mL/kg/min; p < 0.001), and 6MWT distance (530.9 ± 108.9 vs. 455.6 ± 104.3 m; p < 0.001). Significant improvement in heart rate recovery (HRR), indicating autonomic balance, was observed only in the continuous training group (p = 0.026), not in the interval group (p = 0.290). Conclusions: Early rehabilitation within CSC-Infarct (mean 16.8 days post-infarction) during intensive remodeling is safe and effective. Both training modalities produced clinically significant improvements when appropriately matched to patient baseline capacity. Continuous training showed additional benefit in autonomic balance (HRR improvement), while interval training achieved substantial relative gains (+11.8% in 6MWT) in lower-capacity patients. The CSC-Infarct program provides optimal timing for rehabilitation implementation during the critical cardiac remodeling period. Full article

Purpose: Child sexual abuse (CSA) is a major public health and forensic concern, often involving delayed disclosure that limits evidence collection and affects judicial outcomes. This study analyzed disclosure patterns, victim–perpetrator characteristics, and forensic findings in CSA cases evaluated in Greece, contributing to the limited Southern European evidence base. Material and Methods: A retrospective review of 89 CSA cases (2014–2024) examined by a certified forensic physician at the Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, was conducted. Data from official medico-legal reports included demographics, abuse context, forensic findings, and disclosure interval. Statistical analyses explored factors associated with delayed disclosure (>7 days). Results: Victims were predominantly female (69.7%) with a mean age of 9.8 years. Most perpetrators were adult males, and over half of cases (53.9%) involved intrafamilial abuse. The mean delay in disclosure was 79 days; only 29.2% reported within one week. Recurrent abuse correlated with delayed disclosure (p = 0.006), while early disclosure was associated with biological evidence collection (p < 0.001). Physical injuries were observed in 23.6% of victims, genital findings in 17%, and anal findings in 3.4%. Conclusions: Delayed disclosure was common and significantly reduced the likelihood of identifying forensic evidence. The early application of trauma-informed examinations, which adopt a child-centered approach emphasizing safety, emotional regulation, and the prevention of re-traumatization, is essential for the medical and forensic evaluation of abused children. Adopting hospital-based multidisciplinary units could improve forensic documentation, interagency coordination, and psychosocial care in Greece. Full article

Cervical cancer is a largely preventable disease, with over 90% of cases caused by persistent infection with human papillomavirus (HPV). Despite the availability of HPV vaccination and cervical screening, incidence rates in Canada have been rising since 2015, particularly among underserved populations. This study investigates contributing factors behind cervical cancer diagnoses in Eastern Ontario over a two-year period to identify gaps leading to failures in prevention and screening. A retrospective chart review was conducted for cervical cancer cases diagnosed between January 2022 and December 2023 at two regional cancer centres in Eastern Ontario. Cases were categorized as screen-detected, inadequately screened, or system failure, based on prior screening history and care processes. Data was collected on patient, screening, and cancer characteristics. Of 132 cases, 22 (16.7%) were screen-detected, 73 (55.3%) were inadequately screened, and 37 (28.0%) were attributed to healthcare system failure. Later-stage disease was significantly more common in the latter two groups. Thirty-one (23.5%) cases presented with palliative diagnoses, and 18 (13.6%) individuals died within 2.5 years. Inadequate screening was associated with rurality, deprivation, and lack of a primary care provider. System failures included false-negative Pap tests, loss to follow-up, and misapplication of screening guidelines. This study evaluated failures in cervical cancer prevention, which led to cervical cancer diagnoses in Eastern Ontario. Gaps included suboptimal screening participation, lack of access to care, health care system breakdowns, and limitations of the Pap test. Findings provide concrete suggestions for eliminating cervical cancer in Canada. Full article

The 2S LGBTQIA+ (Two-Spirit, Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans, Queer and/or Questioning, Intersex, Asexual, and additional sexually and gender-diverse self-identities) population often faces barriers to care in the context of cervical cancer screening. With the shift from primary cervical cytology (Papanicolaou test) to primary human papillomavirus (HPV)-DNA testing, it is crucial to examine these populations’ healthcare needs. An intersectionality framework with an anti-oppressive lens is needed to restructure a healthcare system whose systems have traditionally erased the care needs of diverse populations through colonial, racialized, and cis-heteronormative practices. Barriers to cervical screening in 2S LGBTQIA+ populations include stigma, discrimination, limited provider guidance and understanding, and high rates of physical, sexual, and medical trauma. Self-sampling for HPV is a less invasive alternative to traditional Pap tests with a high rate of acceptability. The option to self-sample may increase participation in cervical screening based on improved privacy, comfort, and feelings of empowerment. Organizational, psychosocial, and physical recommendations for practice are shared to create a welcoming environment that reflects the diversity of populations in all aspects of healthcare. Affirmative care aims to make clients feel safe and accommodated by prioritizing dignity and respect as essential elements of eliminating cervical cancer in 2S LGBTQIA+ populations. Full article

Background: Considering the significant impact on quality of life and the chronic nature of temporomandibular dysfunction (TMD), seeking healthcare is also part of the reality of individuals with this disorder. However, cultural differences and similarities in the experiences of individuals with TMD have not yet been investigated. This study aimed to describe and compare the experiences, beliefs, and sociocultural factors of Brazilian and Spanish individuals with TMD, focusing on their perceptions of the disorder, diagnostic pathways, information-seeking behaviors, and treatment expectations. Methods: A descriptive qualitative study was conducted. A purposive sample of 50 participants (25 Brazilian, 25 Spanish), aged 18–50 and diagnosed with TMD according to DC/TMD criteria, was recruited. Data were obtained through semi-structured interviews and analyzed using thematic analysis. Results: Six themes emerged, revealing both similarities and differences between the groups. Brazilian participants reported uncertainty about which professional to consult and difficulty accessing specialized care. In contrast, Spanish participants frequently sought physical therapists as their first option and identified them as primary sources of information. Beliefs about TMD etiology varied across samples. Treatment expectations also differed. Brazilians emphasized the difficulty of obtaining effective care, while Spanish participants perceived physiotherapy as being limited to muscular disorders. Perceptions of occlusal splint effectiveness showed variation between the groups. Conclusions: These findings underscore the necessity of culturally sensitive approaches to patient care that address not only clinical aspects, but also the sociocultural context that influences health behaviors. Full article