Search Results (35)

Purpose: We aimed to develop a simple nomogram and online calculator that can identify the optimal subpopulation of pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients who would benefit most from gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) therapy. Methods: Within the framework of the phase Ⅲ AAML0531 randomized trial for GO, the event-free survival (EFS) probability was calculated using a predictor-based nomogram to evaluate GO treatment impact on EFS in relation to baseline characteristics. Nomogram performance was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the calibration curve with 500 bootstrap resample validations. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to evaluate the clinical utility of the nomogram. Results: A total of 705 patients were randomly assigned to two arms: the No-GO arm (n = 358) and the GO arm (n = 347). We performed a nomogram model for EFS among childhood AML. The AUC (C statistic) of the nomogram was 0.731 (95%CI: 0.614–0.762) in the development group and 0.700 (95% CI: 0.506–0.889) in the validation group. DCA showed that the model in the development and validation groups had a net benefit when the risk thresholds were 0–0.75 and 0–0.75, respectively. Notably, an intriguing observation emerged wherein pediatric patients with AML exhibited a favorable outcome in the GO arm when the predicted 5-year EFS probability fell below 60%, demonstrating a superior EFS compared to the No-GO Arm. Conclusions: We have developed a nomogram and online calculator that can be used to predict EFS among childhood AML based on trial AAML0531, and this might help deciding which patients can benefit from GO. Full article

Background: Nucleophosmin-1 (NPM1) mutation accounts for 30% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cases and defines either low- or intermediate-risk AML, depending on FLT3-ITD mutation. New combination regimens (NCRs), adding midostaurin and gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) to the 3 + 7 scheme, are commonly used, though there are no data that compare NCRs with intensive induction chemotherapy. Methods: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of NCRs and FLAI in NPM1+ AML, we retrospectively analyzed 125 patients treated with FLAI (n = 53) or NCRs (n = 72) at seven Italian Centers. Results: The median age was 61 years and 51/125 (41%) were FLT3-ITD+. The complete remission (CR) rate was 77%, slightly better with NCRs (83% vs. 68%; p = 0.054). NCRs yielded a superior median overall survival (OS) (not reached (NR) vs. 27.3 months; p = 0.002), though the median event-free survival (EFS) was similar (NR vs. 20.5 months; p = 0.07). In low-risk AML, CR was higher in NCRs (94% vs. 72%, p = 0.02), as were median OS (NR vs. 41.6 months; p = 0.0002) and EFS (NR vs. 17.8 months; p = 0.0085). In intermediate-risk AML (FLT3-ITD+), there were no differences in CR (60% vs. 71%; p = 0.5), OS (p = 0.27), or EFS (p = 0.86); only allogeneic transplantation improved OS (NR vs. 13.4 months; p = 0.005), regardless of induction regimen. The safety profile was similar, except for delayed platelet recovery with FLAI (22 vs. 18 days; p = 0.0024) and higher-grade II–IV gastrointestinal toxicity with NCRs (43% vs. 18.8%; p = 0.0066). Conclusions: Our data suggest the superiority of NCRs over FLAI in low-risk patients, while all outcomes were comparable in intermediate-risk patients, a setting in which only transplants positively impacted on survival. Full article

Background: The introduction of all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) and arsenic trioxide (ATO) has radically improved the prognosis of acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL), with cure rates above 80%. While relapse occurs in less than 20% of cases, addressing this issue remains challenging. Identifying effective salvage therapies for relapsed APL is crucial to improve patient outcomes. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on a multicentric cohort of 67 APL patients in first relapse, treated in three Italian hematology centers from June 1981 to November 2021. The overall survival (OS) and cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) were calculated, and predictive factors were assessed using Cox regression models. Results: Overall, 61 patients (91%) received ATO ± ATRA (40.3%), chemo-based regimens (40.3%), or ATRA ± Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) (10.4%). Complete remission (CR) was achieved in 98.2% of patients (molecular CR, n = 71.4%). With a median follow-up time of 54.5 months, the 5-year OS was 73% in the ATO ± ATRA group, 44% in the chemo-based group, and 29% in the ATRA ± GO group (p = 0.035). The 5-year OS rate was also higher for transplant recipients vs. non-recipients within the chemo-based cohort (50% vs. 33%, p = 0.017), but not in the ATO-based cohort (p = 0.12). ATO-based salvage therapy resulted in better OS in both univariate (p = 0.025) and multivariate analyses (p = 0.026). The 2-year CIR was higher in patients without molecular CR vs. patients in molecular CR (66% vs. 24%, p = 0.034). Molecular CR was a significant predictor of second relapse in both univariate (p = 0.035) and multivariate analyses (p = 0.036). Conclusions: Our findings support the efficacy of ATO-based therapies in first relapse of APL and confirm the achievement of molecular remission as an independent outcome predictor in both first and second APL relapse. Full article

Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO), a CD33-targeting antibody drug conjugate, previously showed longer relapse-free survival when combined with induction chemotherapy in patients with favorable-risk acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In this patient population, characterized by lower relapse risk as compared to other ELN risk groups, autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) can be used as consolidation strategy. However, there are limited data on the impact of GO on the peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) mobilization potential. We therefore retrospectively analyzed data from 54 AML patients with favorable-risk AML treated with (n = 17) or without (n = 37) GO during induction treatment. We observed no significant differences in the PBSC mobilization rate between patients treated with vs. without GO. The mobilization success in a first attempt directly following cycle 2 was 65% vs. 70% (p = 0.92); and the mobilization success in a subsequent second attempt after hematologic recovery and repeated stimulation procedure was 24% vs. 19% (p = 0.56). No significant impact on treatment outcome in terms of EFS (p = 0.31) or OS (p = 0.99) was observed. Thus, our results suggest that the addition of GO to induction regimens does not negatively impact PBSC mobilization in favorable-risk AML patients. To our best knowledge, this is the first study comparing the stem cell mobilization potential in favorable-risk AML patients treated with vs. without GO. Full article

Introduction: According to the National Cancer Institute of the NIH, acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a rapidly growing cancer with a large quantity of myeloblasts. AML is most often observed in adults over the age of 35, accounting for 1% of all cancer types. In 2023, the number of new cases being reported was estimated to reach around 20,380 in total and the rate of mortality in the same year was 1.9%, or 11,310 cases, in the US. Purpose: This scoping study aims to extensively assess and explore the degree of cardiotoxicity in patients with AML that can be caused due to pharmaceutical treatments prescribed by hematologists. This is achieved by performing extensive searches of different scientific databases including PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect. Results: A variety of options are available that are summarized in tables included herein, with each having their advantages and risks of adverse effects, among these being cardiotoxicity. Important medications found to play a significant role include gemtuzumab ozogamicin, venetoclax, and vyxeos. Conclusions: It is understandable that being familiar with all the treatment options available and every potential adverse effect is impossible. However, hematologists and, in general, physicians must try to be updated with the most recent information released to improve the quality of life of their patients and minimize the risk of additional complications. Full article

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a diverse group of leukemias characterized by the uncontrolled proliferation of clonal neoplastic hematopoietic precursor cells with chromosomal rearrangements and multiple gene mutations and the impairment of normal hematopoiesis. Current efforts to improve AML outcomes have focused on developing targeted therapies that may allow for improved antileukemic effects while reducing toxicity significantly. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) is one of the most thoroughly studied molecularly targeted therapies in adults. GO is a monoclonal antibody against CD33 IgG4 linked to the cytotoxic drug calicheamicin DMH. The use of GO as a chemotherapeutic agent is not generalized for all patients who suffer from AML, particularly for those whose health prevents them from using intensive conventional chemotherapy, in which case it can be used on its own, and those who have suffered a first relapse, where its combination with other chemotherapeutic agents is possible. This systematic review aimed to comprehensively evaluate GO, focusing on its molecular structure, mode of action, pharmacokinetics, recommended dosage, resistance mechanisms, and associated toxicities to provide valuable information on the potential benefits and risks associated with its clinical use. A systematic review of eight scientific articles from 2018 to 2023 was conducted using PRISMA analysis. The results showed that GO treatment activates proapoptotic pathways and induces double-strand breaks, initiating DNA repair mechanisms. Cells defective in DNA repair pathways are susceptible to GO cytotoxicity. GO has recommended doses for newly diagnosed CD33+ AML in combination or as a single agent. Depending on the treatment regimen and patient status, GO doses vary for induction, consolidation, and continuation cycles. Multidrug resistance (MDR) involving P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is associated with GO resistance. The overexpression of P-gp reduces GO cytotoxicity; inhibitors of P-gp can restore sensitivity. Mitochondrial pathway activation and survival signaling pathways are linked to GO resistance. Other resistance mechanisms include altered pharmacokinetics, reduced binding ability, and anti-apoptotic mechanisms. GO has limited extramedullary toxicity compared to other AML treatments and may cause hepatic veno-occlusive disease (HVOD). The incidence of hepatic HVOD after GO therapy is higher in patients with high tumor burden. Hematological side effects and hepatotoxicity are prominent, with thrombocytopenia and neutropenia observed. In conclusion, GO’s reintroduction in 2017 followed a thorough FDA review considering its altered dose, dosing schedule, and target population. The drug’s mechanism involves CD33 targeting and calicheamicin-induced DNA damage, leading to apoptosis and resistance mechanisms, including MDR and survival signaling, which impact treatment outcomes. Despite limited extramedullary toxicity, GO is associated with hematological side effects and hepatotoxicity. Full article

In the last twenty years, we have witnessed a paradigm shift in the treatment and prognosis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML), thanks to the introduction of new efficient drugs or approaches to refine old therapies, such as Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin, CPX 3-5-1, hypomethylating agents, and Venetoclax, the optimization of conditioning regimens in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and the improvement of supportive care. However, the long-term survival of non-M3 and non-core binding factor-AML is still dismal. For this reason, the expectations for the recently developed immunotherapies, such as antibody-based therapy, checkpoint inhibitors, and chimeric antigen receptor strategies, successfully tested in other hematologic malignancies, were very high. The inherent characteristics of AML blasts hampered the development of these treatments, and the path of immunotherapy in AML has been bumpy. Herein, we provide a detailed review of potential antigenic targets, available data from pre-clinical and clinical trials, and future directions of immunotherapies in AML. Full article

Drugs’ safety and effectiveness are evaluated in randomized, dose-ranging trials in most therapeutic areas. However, this is only sometimes feasible in oncology, and dose-ranging studies are mainly limited to Phase 1 clinical trials. Moreover, although new treatment modalities (e.g., small molecule targeted therapies, biologics, and antibody-drug conjugates) present different characteristics compared to cytotoxic agents (e.g., target saturation limits, wider therapeutic index, fewer off-target side effects), in most cases, the design of Phase 1 studies and the dose selection is still based on the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) approach used for the development of cytotoxic agents. Therefore, the dose was not optimized in some cases and was modified post-marketing (e.g., ceritinib, dasatinib, niraparib, ponatinib, cabazitaxel, and gemtuzumab-ozogamicin). The FDA recognized the drawbacks of this approach and, in 2021, launched Project Optimus, which provides the framework and guidance for dose optimization during the clinical development stages of anticancer agents. Since dose optimization is crucial in clinical development, especially of targeted therapies, it is necessary to identify the role of pharmacological tools such as pharmacogenomics, therapeutic drug monitoring, and pharmacodynamics, which could be integrated into all phases of drug development and support dose optimization, as well as the chances of positive clinical outcomes. Full article

Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome/veno-occlusive disease (SOS/VOD) detected in the liver has been considered a severe complication of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). SOS/VOD is characterized by hepatomegaly, right upper quadrant pain, jaundice, and ascites. The severe forms of the disease may result in multi-organ dysfunction (MOD) with a high mortality rate (>80%). The development of SOS/VOD can be rapid and unpredictable. Therefore, early identification and severity assessment is crucial in facilitating prompt diagnosis and timely treatment. Effective treatment and potential prophylaxis with defibrotide highlight the need for characterizing a sub-group of patients at high risk for SOS/VOD. Moreover, antibodies that are conjugated with calicheamicin, gemtuzumab, and inotuzumab ozogamicin, have led to renewed interest in this syndrome. Evaluation and management of serious adverse events associated with gemtuzumab and inotuzumab ozogamicin are recommended. We review hepatic-, transplant- and patient-related risk factors, criteria for diagnosis and grading classification, and SOS/VOD potential biomarkers. Furthermore, we examine pathogenesis, clinical presentation, diagnostic criteria, risk factors, prophylaxis, and treatment of SOS/VOD occurring post HSCT. Moreover, we aim to provide an up-to-date summary of molecular advances in the diagnosis and management of SOS/VOD. We performed a comprehensive review of the literature and examined the recently available data, mostly using the PubMed and Medline search engines for original articles published over the last decade. In the era of precision medicine, our review provides up-to-date knowledge of genetic or sera markers for SOS/VOD with the goal of identifying a subset of high-risk patients. Full article

Background and Objectives: Relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (r/r AML) is a disease with a poor prognosis. Limited treatment options are available in r/r AML. Here, we administered gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) as salvage therapy in twenty-four patients with r/r AML. The aim of the study was to determine the role of GO in r/r AML in real life. Material and Methods: This retrospective observational study recruited 24 adult patients with diagnosed r/r AML from 2018 to 2022. Twenty-four patients with r/r AML were treated with GO. GO treatment was used as monotherapy in 23 patients and in combination with cytarabine in 1 patient. At the time of diagnosis, the risk status of all patients was determined as favorable, intermediate, or adverse according to the 2017 ELN AML guidelines. Results: The median follow-up was 44.3 (13–144) months. Fifteen (62.5%) of the twenty-four patients were in the intermediate-risk cytogenetics group and nine (37.5%) were in the favorable cytogenetics group. The most common adverse events included nausea/vomiting in 79.17% (n = 19) of patients, headache in 62.50% (n = 15), elevated LFTs in 37.50% (n = 9), febrile neutropenia in 25% (n = 6), and bleeding in 25% (n = 6). The most common cause of death was infection. The most common causes of mortality were septic shock, accounting for 33.3% (n = 8) of deaths, and opportunistic lung infection, accounting for 12.5% (n = 3) of deaths. Acute infusion-related toxicities associated with GO were usually transient and, in most cases, responded to the standard of care treatment. After treatment with GO, 16.6% (n = 4) of patients achieved MLFS and 37.5% (n = 9) achieved CR. The overall response rate was 54.1%. The median overall survival time of the patients was 44 months (37.8–50.2 months). Disease-free survival was 22 months (0–48.6 months). The 5-year survival rate was 33%. Conclusions: A low dose of GO improved the overall survival and disease-free survival in r/r AML patients. GO treatment had a positive safety profile in terms of toxicity. Full article

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have revolutionised the treatment of CML. However, TKI do not eliminate the leukaemia stem cells (LSC), which can re-initiate the disease. Thus, finding new therapeutic targets in CML LSC is key to finding a curative treatment. Using microarray datasets, we defined a list of 227 genes that were differentially expressed in CML LSC compared to the healthy controls but were not affected by TKI in vitro. Two of them, CD33 and PPIF, are targeted by gemtuzumab–ozogamicin and cyclosporin A, respectively. We treated CML and the control CD34⁺ cells with either drug with or without imatinib to investigate the therapeutic potential of the TKI-independent gene expression programme. Cyclosporine A, in combination with imatinib, reduced the number of CML CFC compared with non-CML controls, but only at supra-therapeutic concentrations. Gemtuzumab–ozogamicin showed an EC₅₀ of 146 ng/mL, below the plasma peak concentration of 630 ng/mL observed in the AML patients and below the EC₅₀ of 3247 ng/mL observed in the non-CML cells. Interestingly, gemtuzumab–ozogamicin seems to promote cell cycle progression in CML CD34⁺ cells and demonstrated activation of the RUNX1 pathway in an RNAseq experiment. This suggests that targeting the TKI-independent genes in CML LSC could be exploited for the development of new therapies in CML. Full article

The aim of this review is to highlight mechanisms of immunosuppression for each agent, along with pooled analyses of infectious complications from the available medical literature. Rituximab confers no increase in grade ≥3 infectious risks, except in the case of patients with advanced-stage non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Gemtuzumab ozogamicin links with high rates of grade ≥3 infections which, however, are comparable with historical cohorts. Pembrolizumab exhibits a favorable safety profile in terms of severe infections. Despite high rates of hypogammaglobulinemia (HGG) with blinatumomab, low-grade ≥3 infection rates were observed, especially in the post-reinduction therapy of relapsed B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Imatinib and nilotinib are generally devoid of severe infectious complications, but dasatinib may slightly increase the risk of opportunistic infections. Data on crizotinib and pan-Trk inhibitors entrectinib and larotrectinib are limited. CAR T-cell therapy with tisagenlecleucel is associated with grade ≥3 infections in children and is linked with HGG and the emergence of immune-related adverse events. Off-label therapies inotuzumab ozogamicin, brentuximab vedotin, and venetoclax demonstrate low rates of treatment-related grade ≥3 infections, while the addition of bortezomib to standard chemotherapy in T-cell malignancies seems to decrease the infection risk during induction. Prophylaxis, immune reconstitution, and vaccinations for each targeted agent are discussed, along with comparisons to adult studies. Full article

Acute myeloid leukemia is a heterogeneous disease defined by a large spectrum of genetic aberrations that are potential therapeutic targets. New targeted therapies have changed the landscape for a disease with poor outcomes. They are more effective than standard chemotherapy with a good safety profile. For “fit patients” in first-line, the combination of gemtuzumab ozogamicin or midostaurin with intensive chemotherapy or Vyxeos is now considered the “standard of care” for selected patients. On the other hand, for “unfit patients”, azacitidine-venetoclax has been consolidated as a frontline treatment, while other combinations with magrolimab or ivosidenib are in development. Nevertheless, global survival results, especially in relapsed or refractory patients, remain unfavorable. New immunotherapies or targeted therapies, such as Menin inhibitors or sabatolimab, represent an opportunity in this situation. Future directions will probably come from combinations of different targeted therapies (“triplets”) and maintenance strategies guided by measurable residual disease. Full article

Immunotherapy is changing the therapeutic landscape of many hematologic diseases, with immune checkpoint inhibitors, bispecific antibodies, and CAR-T therapies being its greatest expression. Unfortunately, immunotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) has given less brilliant results up to now, and the only approved drug is the antiCD33 antibody-drug conjugate gemtuzumab ozogamicin. A promising field of research in AML therapy relies on anti-leukemic vaccination to induce remission or prevent disease relapse. In this review, we analyze recent evidence on AML vaccines and their biological mechanisms. The principal proteins that have been exploited for vaccination strategies and have reached clinical experimental phases are Wilm’s tumor 1, proteinase 3, and RHAMM. the majority of data deals with WT1-base vaccines, given also the high expression and mutation rates of WT1 in AML cells. Stimulators of immune responses such as TLR7 agonist and interleukin-2 have also proven anti-leukemic activity both in vivo and in vitro. Lastly, cellular vaccines mainly based on autologous or allogeneic off-the-shelf dendritic cell-based vaccines showed positive results in terms of T-cell response and safety, also in elderly patients. Compared to other immunotherapeutic strategies, anti-AML vaccines have the advantage of being a less toxic and a more manageable approach, applicable also to elderly patients with poorer performance status, and may be used in combination with currently available therapies. As for the best scenario in which to use vaccination, whether in a therapeutic, prophylactic, or preemptive setting, further studies are needed, but available evidence points to poorer results in the presence of active or high-burden disease. Given the poor prognosis of relapsed/refractory or high-risk AML, further research is urgently needed to better understand the biological pathways that sustain its pathogenesis. In this setting, research on novel frontiers of immunotherapy-based agents, among which vaccines represent important actors, is warranted to develop new and efficacious strategies to obtain long-term disease control by immune patrolling. Full article

Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) improves outcomes when added to intensive AML chemotherapy. A meta-analysis suggested the greatest benefit when combining fractionated doses of GO (GO3) with 7 + 3. To test whether GO3 can be safely used with high intensity chemotherapy, we conducted a phase 1/2 study of cladribine, high-dose cytarabine, G-CSF, and dose-escalated mitoxantrone (CLAG-M) in adults with newly diagnosed AML or other high-grade myeloid neoplasm (NCT03531918). Sixty-six patients with a median age of 65 (range: 19–80) years were enrolled. Cohorts of six and twelve patients were treated in phase 1 with one dose of GO or three doses of GO (GO3) at 3 mg/m² per dose. Since a maximum-tolerated dose was not reached, the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) was declared to be GO3. At RP2D, 52/60 (87%) patients achieved a complete remission (CR)/CR with incomplete hematologic recovery (CRi), 45/52 (87%) without flow cytometric measurable residual disease (MRD). Eight-week mortality was 0%. Six- and twelve-month event-free survival (EFS) were 73% and 58%; among favorable-risk patients, these estimates were 100% and 95%. Compared to 186 medically matched adults treated with CLAG-M alone, CLAG-M/GO3 was associated with better survival in patients with favorable-risk disease (EFS: p = 0.007; OS: p = 0.030). These data indicate that CLAG-M/GO3 is safe and leads to superior outcomes than CLAG-M alone in favorable-risk AML/high-grade myeloid neoplasm. Full article