Search Results (26)

Background/Objectives: Edentulism represents a major public health challenge, causing disorders of social, psychological and biological origin. Full-arch implant-supported restorations represent a viable alternative to mitigate this problem. This study aimed to evaluate immediate implant-supported restorations for the rehabilitation of the edentulous maxilla using four implants and distal implant tilting between 15 and 20 years. Methods: A total of 740 patients were included (women: 440; men: 300; average age: 55.3 years) rehabilitated with 740 prostheses, supported by 2960 dental implants. The primary outcome measure was prosthetic/implant cumulative survival and success (CSurR;CSucR). Secondary outcome measures included marginal bone loss (MBL), and the incidence of complications was evaluated as a secondary outcome measure. The outcomes were evaluated at 15 and 20 years. Results: In total, 287 patients (38.8%) with 1148 implants (38.8%) were lost to follow-up. A total of 170 implants (5.7%) in 101 patients (13.6%) failed, resulting in an implant CSurR and CSucR of 90.7% and 84.6%, respectively, after up to 20 years of follow-up. The prosthetic success rate was 98.1%. The average MBL was 1.07 mm ± 1.38 mm and 1.46 mm ± 1.56 mm at 15- and 20-years, respectively. Mechanical complication incidence was 78.5%, occurring in 581 patients (provisional prostheses: n = 448, 60.5%; definitive prostheses: n = 374, 50.5%). Biological complications occurred in 449 implants (15.2%) in 260 patients (35.1%). Biological complications and smoking habits were major risk indicators. Conclusions: Considering the study limitations, it can be concluded that the current rehabilitation concept is a viable treatment option in the long term, with mechanical and biological maintenance being necessary throughout the patients’ lives. Full article

Background and Clinical Significance: This case presents immediate implant placement combined with PRF (A-PRF+) and a photogrammetry-based workflow, illustrating predictable full-arch implant-supported rehabilitation. Case Presentation: Main clinical findings included compromised abutment teeth and patient dissatisfaction with aesthetics. Interventions included extractions, immediate implants, PRF socket management, and digital provisional and definitive restorations. Outcomes demonstrated stable occlusion, satisfactory aesthetics, and high patient satisfaction. Conclusions: Immediate placement with PRF and photogrammetry provides reliable outcomes in complex full-arch cases. Full article

Background: Material choice in full-arch implant-supported restorations significantly impacts longevity, complication rates, and patient satisfaction. This retrospective study compared monolithic zirconia versus hybrid metal–ceramic full-arch designs over a minimum three-year follow-up. Methods: Twenty patients (9 female, 11 male; mean age 55.4 ± 7.5 years) treated with full-arch implant-supported restorations were reviewed. Ten received monolithic zirconia restorations; ten received hybrid metal–ceramic. Clinical outcomes, including mechanical complications, prosthetic maintenance needs, opposing dentition wear, and patient-reported satisfaction (esthetics, comfort, masticatory function via VAS), were recorded. Statistical analyses were performed using Chi-square, independent t-tests, or Mann–Whitney U tests, with a significance level set at p < 0.05. Results: All implants (100%) and prostheses (>95%) survived. Monolithic zirconia exhibited no veneering chipping, while two events were observed in hybrid restorations (difference not statistically significant), and one bulk fracture occurred (monolithic). Hybrids had no framework fractures. Screw loosening occurred in one zirconia case. Mean VAS scores exceeded 9.0 in both groups; zirconia scored slightly higher for esthetics (9.4 ± 0.5 vs. 8.8 ± 0.6) and comfort (9.2 ± 0.6 vs. 9.0 ± 0.7). Polished zirconia resulted in no clinically detectable enamel wear, whereas hybrids with glaze loss caused occasional mild enamel wear but without functional impairment. Conclusions: Both restoration types show excellent survival and patient satisfaction over three years. Monolithic zirconia reduces veneering-related complications and maintenance, suggesting a possible advantage in functionally demanding cases with high occlusal loads or limited prosthetic space; hybrids may remain preferable when esthetic customization and gingival contour reproduction are paramount. Full article

Background: This retrospective comparative clinical study aimed to evaluate the performance of digital versus conventional impression techniques in the fabrication of implant-supported prosthetic restorations. Materials and Methods: A total of 40 cases were included: 20 impressions obtained with conventional elastomeric materials (polyvinyl siloxane and polyether), and 20 impressions acquired digitally using two intraoral scanners (TRIOS 3 and Medit i700). All patients received partial fixed implant restorations and were documented across all stages of prosthetic treatment. Accuracy and passive fit were assessed using radiographic measurements and the Sheffield test. Linear distances (mm) at the implant–abutment interface, chairside time (min), and VAS scores (1–10) were analyzed. Clinical efficiency was evaluated based on procedural steps, chairside time, and adjustment frequency. Patient satisfaction was assessed through a structured 10-item Visual Analog Scale (VAS) questionnaire. Results: Results showed a lower misfit rate in the digital group (15%) compared to the conventional group (25%), with no final-stage misfits in digital cases. Digital workflows demonstrated shorter impression times, fewer procedural steps, and reduced the need for prosthetic adjustments. Patient satisfaction scores were significantly higher in the digital group across all VAS parameters (p < 0.001), particularly in comfort and esthetic satisfaction. Conclusions: These findings support the use of digital impressions as a clinically efficient and patient-preferred alternative to conventional methods for partial implant restorations. However, conventional impressions remain a viable option in settings where digital technology is not available. Further studies with larger sample sizes and long-term follow-up are recommended to assess outcomes in full-arch rehabilitation. Full article

Finite element analysis is commonly used to evaluate implant biomechanics, yet limited data exist on arch form and trabecular-surfaced implants. This study aimed to investigate the biomechanical impact of a designed trabecular surface compared with a standard implant surface in full-arch, four-implant-supported restorations, using two mandibular arch forms and four placement configurations. Finite element analyses were conducted under a 250-N oblique load applied at 30° to the posterior segment. The prosthesis was modeled as a titanium–acrylic hybrid structure. Stress distribution was evaluated in cortical and cancellous bones, implants, and prosthetic frameworks. Implants with a trabecular surface demonstrated lower stress concentrations in both bone and implant structures. The von Mises stress at the neck of the posterior implant decreased from 383.3 MPa (standard implant, hyperbolic arch, configuration 1) to 194.9 MPa (trabecular-surfaced implant, U-shaped arch, configuration 4). Similarly, the average maximum principal tensile stress in cortical bone reduced from 44.32 to 40.99 MPa with the trabecular design. Among placement strategies, Configuration 3 (all implants tilted distally) yielded the highest bone stress, whereas Configurations 2 and 4 provided more favorable load distribution. Stress concentrations were also higher in hyperbolic arches, whereas U-shaped arches exhibited a more uniform distribution. These findings emphasized the biomechanical advantage of the designed trabecular surface in reducing stress across bone and implant components, indicating that trabecular titanium may represent a more reliable and cost-effective alternative for clinical applications, potentially enhancing long-term stability. Independently, the arch form and placement strategy also significantly influenced load distribution. Despite assumptions such as isotropic, homogeneous, and linearly elastic material properties, and the use of a single oblique loading condition, this study offers valuable biomechanical insights such as the stress-reducing effect of the trabecular surface, the influence of three-dimensional arch anatomy on stress concentration sites, and the necessity of selecting implant configurations according to arch forms, which may inform future full-arch implant rehabilitations. Full article

Background/Objectives: This study aimed to assess the long-term clinical performance of full-arch fixed restorations made of fiber-reinforced composite (FRC) supported by four ultra-short implants (4.0 × 5.0 mm) in patients with edentulous, atrophic mandibles. Methods: Ten patients were treated at Sapienza University of Rome and monitored over a 10-year period. Each case involved the placement of four plateau-design implants with a pure conometric connection and a calcium phosphate-treated surface. The final prostheses were fabricated using CAD/CAM-milled Trinia^® fiber-reinforced composite frameworks. Clinical parameters included implant and prosthesis survival, marginal bone level (MBL), peri-implant probing depth (PPD), and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Results: Implant and prosthesis survival reached 100% over the 10-year follow-up. MBL data showed a minor bone gain of approximately 0.11 mm per 5 years (p < 0.0001). PPD remained stable under 3 mm, with a minimal increase of 0.16 mm over the same period (p < 0.0001). PROMs reflected sustained high patient satisfaction. No technical complications, such as chipping or framework fracture, were observed. Conclusions: Rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible with ultra-short implants and metal-free FRC prostheses proved to be a minimally invasive and long-lasting treatment option. The 10-year follow-up confirmed excellent implant and prosthetic outcomes, favorable peri-implant tissue health, and strong patient satisfaction. Nonetheless, further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to confirm these encouraging results and strengthen the clinical evidence. Full article

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and advanced digital workflows is revolutionising full-arch implant dentistry, particularly for geriatric patients with edentulous and atrophic arches, for whom achieving both prosthetic passivity and optimal aesthetic outcomes is critical. This narrative review evaluates current challenges in intraoral scanning accuracy—such as scan distortion, angular deviation, and cross-arch misalignment—and presents how innovations like the Medit SmartX AI-guided workflow and the Scan Ladder system can significantly enhance precision in implant position registration. These technologies mitigate stitching errors by using real-time scan body recognition and auxiliary geometric references, yielding mean RMS trueness values as low as 11–13 µm, comparable to dedicated photogrammetry systems. AI-driven prosthetic design further aligns implant-supported restorations with facial symmetry and smile aesthetics, prioritising predictable midline and occlusal plane control. Early clinical data indicate that such tools can reduce prosthetic misfits to under 20 µm and lower complication rates related to passive fit, while shortening scan times by up to 30% compared to conventional workflows. This is especially valuable for elderly individuals who may not tolerate multiple lengthy adjustments. Additionally, emerging AI applications in design automation, scan validation, and patient-specific workflow adaptation continue to evolve, supporting more efficient and personalised digital prosthodontics. In summary, AI-enhanced scanning and prosthetic workflows do not merely meet functional demands but also elevate aesthetic standards in complex full-arch rehabilitations. The synergy of AI and digital dentistry presents a transformative opportunity to consistently deliver superior precision, passivity, and facial harmony for edentulous implant patients. Full article

Background/Objectives: Subperiosteal implants (SPIs) were first used in the 1940s, but due to their complications and the rise of dental implants, they were discontinued. Thanks to new technologies and new materials, nowadays they are being used again and studied as a treatment for severe bone defects. This review analyzes the clinical results—survival rates and complications—of SPIs used to support full arch rehabilitations of severely resorbed maxillae and mandibles, comparing the outcomes resulting from implant placement conducted in one or two surgical interventions. Methods: An automated search was conducted in four databases (Medline/Pubmed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library), as well as a manual search for relevant clinical articles published before 28 February 2025. The review included human studies with at least four patients, in which SPIs were placed to restore full-arch edentulous maxillae and mandibles. Quality of evidence was evaluated using the Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale and the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal tool. Results: A total of 14 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included for analysis, including 958 patients and 973 SPIs. The survival rate was 100% when one surgical intervention was performed and 85% when two interventions were performed after 4–38 months and 3–22 years follow-up, respectively. Conclusions: SPIs would appear to offer a good alternative for patients with severe bone atrophies, especially SPIs fabricated using digital techniques in a single step, presenting promising survival rates and a low complication rate, although more randomized clinical trials with long-term follow-up are needed. Full article

Background/Objectives: Digital workflows for implant-supported full-arch restorations remain challenging. This study evaluated the accuracy and precision of digital impressions using reverse scan body (RSB) prototypes and intraoral scanners (IOSs) for rehabilitating fully edentulous patients following the All-on-4 protocol. Secondary objectives included comparing accuracy between expert clinicians and beginners, as well as desktop scanners and various RSB designs. Methods: An in vitro study was conducted using a fully edentulous mandible model with four Osstem TSIII implants. A final-year dental student and an expert clinician captured digital impressions using IOSs and desktop scanners. Four groups were analyzed: (A) original scan bodies with the IOS, (B) short RSBs with the IOS, (C) RSBs with desktop scanners (short sandblasted, long sandblasted, long coated), and (D) a control group using original scan bodies with a desktop scanner. Root mean square (RMS) values measured dimensional differences, with statistical analysis performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and one-way ANOVA (α = 0.05). Results: A total of 42 scans were analyzed. No significant difference was found between expert and student for original scan bodies using the IOS (p = 0.220), while RSB prototypes showed significant differences (p = 0.008). No significant accuracy differences were noted between original scan bodies and RSBs with the IOS, but IOSs outperformed desktop scanners. Among RSBs scanned with desktop scanners, no significant differences were observed between designs. Conclusions: RSB prototypes are a viable alternative to original scan bodies for fully digital workflows in All-on-4 rehabilitations, with IOSs offering superior accuracy. However, proper training is crucial for optimizing RSB accuracy. Variations in height and coating did not impact overall accuracy. Full article

Background/Objectives: The technical development of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses (iFDP) initially concentrated on the computer-aided manufacturing of prosthetic restorations (CAM). Advances in information technologies have shifted the focus for optimizing digital workflows to AI-based processes for design (CAD). This pre-clinical pilot trial investigated the feasibility of the automatic design of three-unit iFDPs using CAD software (Dental Manger 2021, 3Shape; DentalCAD 3.1 Rijeka, exocad GmbH). Methods: Two clinical scenarios based on a full dentition were created virtually. Physical models were produced and digitized using two intraoral scanners applying quadrant or full-arch scans (Trios3, 3Shape, Copenhagen, Denmark; and Primescan AC, Dentsply Sirona, Bensheim, Germany). For each scenario, iFDP designs were generated automatically using two laboratory software systems (Dental Manger 2021, 3Shape; DentalCAD 3.1 Rijeka, exocad GmbH), resulting in 80 STL datasets (2 scenarios × 2 scan strategies × 2 IOS systems × 5 scan repetitions × 2 software). The files were analyzed clinically for the contact schemes and pontic area. One of the automated designs for each scenario was manually post-processed and one iFDP design for each scenario was manually created by experienced dental technicians (control). The time required for all the design processes was recorded. Results: The automatic design of iFDPs without manual adjustment did not lead to clinically acceptable restorations. The time required for the automatically generated/manually adjusted iFDPs designs was not significantly different to that for the manually designed restorations. Conclusions: Current laboratory software can not automatically generate three-unit iFDPs with clinically acceptable results in terms of the interproximal and occlusal contacts and the pontic design. The automatic iFDP design process currently requires manual adjustment, which means there is no benefit in terms of the working time compared with manually created restorations. Full article

Full-arch zirconia restorations on implants have gained popularity due to zirconia’s strength and aesthetics, yet they are still associated with challenges like structural fractures, peri-implant complications, and design misfits. Advances in CAD/CAM and digital workflows offer potential improvements, but a technique that consistently addresses these issues in fixed, full-arch, implant-supported prostheses is needed. This novel technique integrates a facially and prosthetically driven treatment approach, which is divided into three phases: data acquisition, restoration design, and manufacturing/delivery. Digital tools, including intraoral scanning and photogrammetry, facilitate accurate implant positioning, while 3D design software enables functional and aesthetic validation before final milling. A dual software approach is used to reverse engineer a titanium bar from the final restoration design, ensuring a superior outcome to other protocols. The restoration incorporates a zirconia–titanium hybrid structure, optimizing strength, flexibility, and weight. The proposed workflow enhances restoration precision and predictability through a prosthetically driven treatment plan, by ensuring passivity and aligning with biological and mechanical principles to promote long-term stability. By starting with the proposed restoration design and reverse engineering the bar, while also allowing for flexibility in material and component choices, this technique accommodates both patient needs and financial considerations. This approach demonstrates potential for improving patient outcomes in full-arch implant restorations by minimizing complications associated with traditional methods. Further research is recommended to validate the technique’s efficacy and broaden its clinical applications. Full article

The geometry of implants plays a crucial role in the success of All-on-Four treatments for the lower jaw. This study builds upon prior research by evaluating the biomechanical performance of implant-supported prostheses in full-arch fixed dental restorations, specifically focusing on different implant lengths and connection types in cases of mild atrophic resorption of the mandible. Four groups were analyzed using finite element analysis (FEA): We utilized 13 or 18 mm posterior 17-degree tilting implants, each paired with two kinds of abutment connections. The external hexagon connection (EHC) group utilized 4 mm diameter implants, while the internal hexagon connection (IHC) group employed 4.3 mm diameter implants. A vertical force was applied to the cantilever region located at the distal side of the posterior implant. The maximum stress regions were observed in prosthetic screws and multi-unit abutments (MUAs) across all groups, with the lowest von Mises stress values noted in the bone. Stress peaks for implant screws and fixtures in the 13 mm group were 19.98% and 11.42% lower, respectively, compared to the IHC group. Similarly, in the 18 mm group, stress peaks were reduced by 33.16% and 39.70% for the EHC group compared to the IHC group. The stress levels on all components remained below the ultimate strength of the titanium alloy. For the same implant lengths, the stress in the prosthetic screw, MUAs, implant screw, and implant fixture positions was lower in the EHC group. When implant length was increased, a decrease in stress levels was observed in the implant screw and fixture of the EHC group and only in the implant screw of the IHC group. However, an increase in stress was noted in the prosthetic screw and MUAs for both groups. Full article

Background: In recent years, advancements in digital dentistry have provided new opportunities for more predictable and efficient treatment options, particularly in patients with failing dentition. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and accuracy of a fully digital workflow using stackable surgical templates for complete dental arch rehabilitation with implant-supported fixed restorations. Methods: Four patients, comprising two males and two females with a mean age of 66 years, were included in this case series. Each patient underwent meticulous digital planning, including CBCT and intraoral scanning, to create a virtual patient for preoperative assessment and virtual treatment planning. The assessment of the trueness of implant positioning was conducted in Geomagic Control X software (version 2017.0.3) by referencing anatomical landmarks from both the preoperative and one-year postoperative CBCT scans. Results: A total of 25 dental implants were placed in the maxilla, followed by the installation of long-term provisional restorations. The results showed minimal deviation between the planned and actual implant positions, with mean 3D coronal, apical, and angular discrepancies of 0.87 mm, 2.04 mm, and 2.67°, respectively. All implants achieved successful osseointegration, and no failures were recorded, resulting in a 100% survival rate at the one-year follow-up. Patients reported high satisfaction with both the esthetic and functional outcomes based on their subjective feedback. Conclusions: The findings suggest that the use of a fully digital workflow with stackable surgical templates is a reliable and effective approach for immediate implant placement and prosthetic rehabilitation, enhancing treatment precision and patient comfort. Full article

The present short-term retrospective study evaluated the implant survival rate and peri-implant bone loss around additive-manufactured titanium implants placed in sinuses grafted with Plenum Osshp (Plenum Bioengenharia, Jundia, SP, Brazil) (70HA:30β-TCP) material. A total of 39 implants were inserted after 23 sinus floor elevation procedures in 16 consecutive patients. Prosthetic rehabilitation included fixed partial prostheses (three units), single crowns (eleven units), and fixed full arches (three units). Clinical and radiographic parameters of implant-supported restorations were evaluated after at least one year of occlusal loading. The implant–crown success criteria included the absence of pain, suppuration, and clinical mobility, an average distance between the implant shoulder and the first visible bone contact (DIB) < 1.0 mm from the initial surgery, and the absence of prosthetic complications at the implant–abutment interface. The overall cumulative implant survival rate was 97.43%. No prosthetic complications at the implant–abutment interface were reported. After one year, the mean DIB was 0.23 mm ± 0.14. Within the limits of this retrospective study, it can be concluded that 70 HA:30 β-TCP allowed stable and reliable bone support to maintain healthy conditions around titanium dental implants produced by additive manufacturing. Full article

Background: the aim of the study was to assess, through orthopantomograms (OPGs), the existence of peri-implant bone loss of distal implants in implant-supported full-arch mandibular restorations. A comparison between full-arch implant-supported rehabilitations performed in the inter-foraminal region and full-arch rehabilitations that include implant insertion distal to the mental foramen was conducted. Methods: a retrospective observational analysis of 17,950 OPGs from 2010 to 2020 was conducted. The presence of fixed implant-supported prostheses in a fully edentulous mandible was the inclusion criteria of the study. OPGs were divided according to the number of implants (four, six, and eight), position of the implants (mesial or distal to the mental foramen), and positioning patterns (models 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5). Results: a total of 51 OPGs were included in the study, 19 of which showed peri-implant bone loss. In particular, 16 belonged to the six-implant rehabilitation group and 3 to the eight-implant rehabilitation group; none of the four-implant-supported rehabilitations were affected by peri-implant bone loss. In all rehabilitations affected by peri-implant bone loss, the distal implant was the most involved, in particular the implant in positions 36 and 46. Conclusions: implants distal to the mental foramina are more susceptible than mesial implants to bone resorption in full-arch fixed implant-supported prostheses. This significant difference should be investigated further for the presence and synergy of biomechanical factors that could act predominantly in this area, such as mandibular flexure and occlusal loading. Full article