Search Results (7)

Background/Objectives: Mesenchymal–epithelial transition (MET) gene amplification is a critical biomarker in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), significantly influencing treatment decisions and prognostic evaluations. However, current detection methods such as fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) have limitations in speed, cost, and specificity, particularly when distinguishing between focal MET amplification and MET polysomy. Methods: This study introduces a novel digital PCR (dPCR) assay designed not only to detect MET amplification but also to differentiate between its focal and non-focal subtypes. The assay was evaluated against established FISH and targeted NGS panels using 55 NSCLC samples with known MET amplification statuses (26 positive and 29 negative) confirmed by FISH and NGS. Results The dPCR assay demonstrated high sensitivity (96.0%) and specificity (96.7%), achieving 100% concordance with FISH in differentiating focal MET amplification from MET polysomy. Additionally, the assay exhibited excellent precision, accuracy, and linearity (R² = 1.00) in MET copy number quantification, surpassing NGS in diagnostic performance. Offering a robust, cost-effective, and efficient alternative to FISH, the dPCR assay significantly reduces the turnaround time (3 h versus 2 days) and provides a quantitative and objective method for MET amplification detection and subtype differentiation. This makes it suitable for clinical laboratories with limited molecular expertise. Conclusions: This study highlights the potential of the dPCR assay to complement existing molecular diagnostic techniques, delivering reliable and actionable results for MET-targeted therapy selection in NSCLC patients and thereby advancing precision oncology. Full article

Brain tumors represent a heterogeneous group of neoplasms characterized by a high degree of aggressiveness and a poor prognosis. Despite recent therapeutic advances, the treatment of brain tumors, including glioblastoma (GBM), an aggressive primary brain tumor associated with poor prognosis and resistance to therapy, remains a significant challenge. Receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) are critical during development and in adulthood. Dysregulation of RTKs through activating mutations and gene amplification contributes to many human cancers and provides attractive therapeutic targets for treatment. Under physiological conditions, the Met RTK, the hepatocyte growth factor/scatter factor (HGF/SF) receptor, promotes fundamental signaling cascades that modulate epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) involved in tissue repair and embryogenesis. In cancer, increased Met activity promotes tumor growth and metastasis by providing signals for proliferation, survival, and migration/invasion. Recent clinical genomic studies have unveiled multiple mechanisms by which MET is genetically altered in GBM, including focal amplification, chromosomal rearrangements generating gene fusions, and a splicing variant mutation (exon 14 skipping, METex14del). Notably, MET overexpression contributes to chemotherapy resistance in GBM by promoting the survival of cancer stem-like cells. This is linked to distinctive Met-induced pathways, such as the upregulation of DNA repair mechanisms, which can protect tumor cells from the cytotoxic effects of chemotherapy. The development of MET-targeted therapies represents a major step forward in the treatment of brain tumours. Preclinical studies have shown that MET-targeted therapies (monoclonal antibodies or small molecule inhibitors) can suppress growth and invasion, enhancing the efficacy of conventional therapies. Early-phase clinical trials have demonstrated promising results with MET-targeted therapies in improving overall survival for patients with recurrent GBM. However, challenges remain, including the need for patient stratification, the optimization of treatment regimens, and the identification of mechanisms of resistance. This review aims to highlight the current understanding of mechanisms underlying MET dysregulation in GBM. In addition, it will focus on the ongoing preclinical and clinical assessment of therapies targeting MET dysregulation in GBM. Full article

EGFR-mutant lung cancers develop a wide range of potential resistance alterations under therapy with the third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor osimertinib. MET amplification ranks among the most common acquired resistance alterations and is currently being investigated as a therapeutic target in several studies. Nevertheless, targeted therapy of MET might similarly result in acquired resistance by point mutations in MET, which further expands therapeutic and diagnostic challenges. Here, we report a 50-year-old male patient with EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma and stepwise acquired resistance by a focal amplification of MET followed by D1246N (D1228N), D1246H (D1228H), and L1213V (L1195V) point mutations in MET, all detected by NGS. The patient successfully responded to the combined and sequential treatment of osimertinib, osimertinib/crizotinib, and third-line osimertinib/cabozantinib. This case highlights the importance of well-designed, sequential molecular diagnostic analyses and the personalized treatment of patients with acquired resistance. Full article

The MET gene plays a vital role in cellular proliferation, earning it recognition as a principal oncogene. Therapies that target MET amplification have demonstrated promising results both in preclinical models and in specific clinical cases. A significant obstacle to these therapies is the ability to distinguish between focal amplification and polysomy, a task for which simple MET copy number measurement proves insufficient. To effectively differentiate between the two, it is crucial to utilize comparative measures, including in situ hybridization (ISH) with the centromere or next generation sequencing (NGS) with adjacent genes. Despite the promising potential of MET amplification treatment, the judicious selection of patients is paramount to maximize therapeutic efficacy. The effectiveness of MET inhibitors can fluctuate depending on the extent of MET amplification. Future research must seek to establish the ideal threshold value for MET amplification, identify the most efficacious combination therapies, and innovate new targeted treatments for patients exhibiting MET amplification. Full article

Background: Parallel sequencing technologies have become integrated into clinical practice. This study evaluated the TruSight Tumor 170 assay for the simultaneous detection of somatic gene mutations (SNPs and indels), gene fusions and CNVs, and its implementation into routine diagnostics. Methods: Forty-four formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples analyzed previously with validated methods were evaluated with the TruSight Tumor 170 assay (Illumina). For data analysis the TruSight Tumor 170 app, the BaseSpace Variant Interpreter (Illumina), and the Molecular Health Guide Software (Molecular Health) were used. Results: All somatic gene mutations were identified when covered by the assay. Two high-level MET amplifications were detected by CNV analysis. Focal MET amplifications with a copy number below 10 were not reliably detected at the DNA-level. Twenty-one of 31 fusions and splice variants were confirmed with the assay on the RNA-level. The remaining eight aberrations were incorrect by previous methods. In two cases, no splicing was observed. Conclusions: The TruSight Tumor 170 gives reliable results even if low DNA and RNA concentrations are applied in comparison to other methods and can be used in a routine workflow to detect somatic gene mutations, gene fusions, and splice variants. However, we were not able to detect most focal gene amplifications/deletions. Full article

Amplification (amp) of MET can be observed in cases of focal gene copy number gain, such as MET-driven amp, or with a gain of chromosome 7, such as aneuploidy. Several studies have shown that only high-level focal MET amp (MET/CEP7 ratio ≥5) is oncogenic, with such tumors responding to targeted therapy. However, there are few reports on how to distinguish between focal amplification and aneuploidy using next-generation sequencing (NGS). A total of 1025 patients with advanced solid tumors (typically pre-treated) were tested with a non-invasive comprehensive cfDNA NGS panel (Guardant360) from July 2014 to June 2019. Since bioinformatics upgrades of Guardant360 were undergoing in September 2018, focal MET amp was determined by our independent algorithm using the cohorts tested before September 2018 (291 patients), and validation was performed in the remaining cohort (734 patients). MET alterations (alts) associated with aberrant signaling were found in 110 patients (10.7%) among nine different cancer types, most commonly in non-small cell (12.2%, 62/510) and small cell (33.3%, 3/9) lung cancers, gastroesophageal cancer (19.4%, 7/36), and prostate adenocarcinoma (15.6%; 5/32). Among 291 patients tested before September 2018, 37 (12.7%) had MET alts. Among these, 24 (64.9%) had amps, 5 (13.5%) had exon 14 skipping, and 13 (35.1%) had single nucleotide variants (SNVs). Co-alterations, such as amp + SNVs, were found in four samples (10.8%). Among 24 MET amps, 29.2% (7/24) were focal according to our algorithm. MET copy number was significantly higher with focal amp compared to non-focal amp (mean copy number 3.26 vs. 2.44, respectively, p = 0.00304). In 734 patients tested after September 2018, our definition of focal MET amp was detected in 4.2% (31/734). Overall, focal amplification based on our algorithm was 3.7% (=38/1025). This study describes an approach to distinguish focal and non-focal MET amplification using comprehensive genomic profiling of cfDNA in advanced cancer patients. Focal MET amp accounted for ~30% of all MET amp, which was found in 3.7% of patients with diverse cancers and was associated with a higher plasma copy number. Clinical studies are warranted to assess the clinical utility of targeted therapies for tumors with focal MET amplification detected by NGS of cfDNA. Full article

The fact that most gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) acquire resistance to imatinib (IM)-based targeted therapy remains the main driving force to identify novel molecular targets that are capable to increase GISTs sensitivity to the current therapeutic regimens. Secondary resistance to IM in GISTs typically occurs due to several mechanisms that include hemi- or homo-zygous deletion of the wild-type KIT allele, overexpression of focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and insulin-like growth factor receptor I (IGF-1R) amplification, BRAF mutation, a RTK switch (loss of c-KIT and gain of c-MET/AXL), etc. We established and characterized the IM-resistant GIST T-1 cell line (GIST T-1R) lacking secondary c-KIT mutations typical for the IM-resistant phenotype. The resistance to IM in GIST T-1R cells was due to RTK switch (loss of c-KIT/gain of FGFR2α). Indeed, we have found that FGFR inhibition reduced cellular viability, induced apoptosis and affected the growth kinetics of the IM-resistant GISTs in vitro. In contrast, IM-naive GIST T-1 parental cells were not susceptible to FGFR inhibition. Importantly, inhibition of FGF-signaling restored the susceptibility to IM in IM-resistant GISTs. Additionally, IM-resistant GISTs were less susceptible to certain chemotherapeutic agents as compared to parental IM-sensitive GIST cells. The chemoresistance in GIST T-1R cells is not due to overexpression of ABC-related transporter proteins and might be the result of upregulation of DNA damage signaling and repair (DDR) genes involved in DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair pathways (e.g., XRCC3, Rad51, etc.). Taken together, the established GIST T-1R cell subline might be used for in vitro and in vivo studies to examine the efficacy and prospective use of FGFR inhibitors for patients with IM-resistant, un-resectable and metastatic forms of GISTs with the type of RTK switch indicated above. Full article