Search Results (27)

Sustainable finance and carbon risk have attracted substantial interest from both practitioners and scholars. This paper integrates the income-based environmental responsibility framework with financial asset pricing models to investigate how carbon transition risk propagates along value chains and impacts asset returns. By utilizing the Ghosh supply-driven input–output model to quantify downstream value chain carbon emissions as a proxy for the dependence of a company’s revenue streams on high-carbon downstream clients, we construct a novel downstream carbon risk factor (DMC) by sorting stocks into portfolios based on this exposure and forming a factor mimicking long short portfolio. We then integrate this DMC factor into the Fama–French five-factor framework to propose a six-factor model capable of capturing value chain risk transmission. Empirical results of Chinese A-share listed companies demonstrate that firms with high DMC exposure, being vulnerable to carbon transition shocks such as carbon pricing, offer a significant risk premium even after controlling for traditional financial characteristics. This finding provides robust evidence for the carbon premium hypothesis in the world’s largest emerging market and contributes a theoretically grounded and empirically implementable framework for integrating value chain carbon risk into asset pricing analysis. Full article

Accurately predicting asset returns remains a central challenge in finance, with significant implications for portfolio optimization and risk management. In response to the challenge, this study evaluates the predictive performance of machine learning algorithms in estimating excess returns of U.S. industry portfolios, within the out-of-sample prediction framework of the Fama–French three-, four-, five- and six-factor asset pricing models. In the analysis, Support Vector Regression, Multilayer Perceptron, Linear Regression, and k-Nearest Neighbor were employed using monthly return data from 1992 to 2022, covering 5-, 10-, 12-, 17-, 30-, 38-, 48-, and 49-portfolio configurations composed of NYSE, AMEX, and NASDAQ-listed firms. The findings reveal that support vector regression achieved the highest number of top-ranked results, producing the most successful outcomes in 305 out of 836 model–portfolio combinations. However, multilayer perceptron achieved the best fit in the largest number of portfolios, ranking first in all groups except the 5-industry configuration. Furthermore, the Fama–French five-factor model outperformed other specifications across all groupings, confirming the value of incorporating profitability and investment information. Predictive performance also varied by industry, as wholesale and manufacturing sectors exhibited strong alignment, whereas utilities and energy-related sectors, likely constrained by structural or regulatory features, remained less responsive and exposed to long-term risks. Full article

This study explores the time-varying influence of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors on asset pricing in China’s A-share market from 2017 to 2023, integrating investor heterogeneity categorized as ESG-unaware (Type-U), ESG-aware (Type-A), and ESG-motivated (Type-M). taxonomy. It adopts a linear regression model with seven control variables (including firm systematic risk, asset turnover ratio, and ownership concentration) to quantify ESG’s marginal effect on stock returns. Annual regressions (2017–2022) reveal distinct ESG coefficient shifts: insignificant negative coefficients in 2017–2018, significantly positive coefficients in 2019–2020, and significantly negative coefficients in 2021–2022. Heterogeneity analysis across five non-financial industries (Utilities, Properties, Conglomerates, Industrials, Commerce) shows industry-specific ESG effects. Portfolio performance tests using 2023 data (stocks divided into eight ESG groups) indicate that portfolios with medium ESG scores outperform high/low ESG portfolios and the traditional mean-variance model in risk-adjusted returns (Sharpe ratio) and volatility control, avoiding poor governance risks (low ESG) and excessive ESG resource allocation issues (high ESG). Overall, policy shocks and institutional maturation transformed the market from ESG indifference to ESG-motivated pricing within a decade, offering insights for stakeholders in emerging ESG markets. Full article

We refine a bottom-up, quantity-clearing framework of Bitcoin price formation that couples its fixed 21-million-coin cap with plausible demand growth and execution behavior. This approach relies on first-principles economic supply-and-demand dynamics rather than assumptions about anticipated Bitcoin price appreciation, its price history, or its potential effectiveness in demonetizing other asset classes. We considered five key high-level factors that may affect price determination: level of market demand; intertemporal investment preferences; fiat-denominated withdrawal sensitivity; initial liquid supply; and daily withdrawal levels from liquid supply. With a goal of both increasing understanding of the impacts of price drivers and developing probabilistic forecasts, we show two models: (1) a baseline to assess the impacts of parameter changes, alone and in combination, on Bitcoin price trajectories and liquid supply over time and (2) a Monte Carlo simulation that incorporates uncertainty across a range of uncertain parameterizations and presents probabilistic price and liquid supply forecasts to 2036. Our baseline model highlighted the importance of liquid supply and withdrawal sensitivity in price impacts. The Monte Carlo simulation results suggest a 50% likelihood that Bitcoin price will exceed USD 5.17 M by April 2036. Generally, prices from the low single millions to the low tens of millions per Bitcoin by 2036 emerge under broad parameter sets; hyperbolic paths to higher price levels are relatively rare and concentrate when liquid supply falls near or below BTC 2 M and withdrawal sensitivity is low. Our results help locate where right-tail risk and disorderly market outcomes concentrate and suggest that policy tools are available to help guide trajectories. Full article

Over the past decade, multifactor models have shown enhanced capability compared to single-factor models in explaining asset return variability. Given the common assertion that higher risk tends to yield higher returns, this study empirically examines the augmented human capital six-factor model’s performance on thirty-two portfolios of non-financial firms sorted by size, value, profitability, investment, and labor income growth in the Indian market over the period July 2010 to June 2023. Moreover, the current study extends the Fama and French five-factor model by incorporating a human capital proxy by labor income growth as an additional factor thereby proposing an augmented six-factor asset pricing model (HC6FM). The Fama and MacBeth two-step estimation methodology is employed for the empirical analysis. The results reveal that small-cap portfolios yield significantly higher returns than large-cap portfolios. Moreover, all six factors significantly explain the time-series variation in excess portfolio returns. Our findings reveal that the Indian stock market experienced heightened volatility during the COVID-19 pandemic, leading to a decline in the six-factor model’s efficiency in explaining returns. Furthermore, Gibbons, Ross, and Shanken (GRS) test results reveal mispricing of portfolio returns during COVID-19, with a stronger rejection of portfolio efficiency across models. However, the HC6FM consistently shows lower pricing errors and better performance, specifically during and after the pandemic era. Overall, the results offer important insights for policymakers, investors, and portfolio managers in optimizing portfolio selection, particularly during periods of heightened market uncertainty. Full article

This study comparatively evaluated the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), the Fama and French three-factor model (FF3), and the Fama and French five-factor model (FF5) in key US market sectors (finance, energy, and utilities). The goals were to optimize financial decisions and reduce valuation errors. The historical daily returns of ten-stock portfolios, selected from sectors with the highest trading volume in the S&P 500 Index between 2020 and 2024, were analyzed. Companies with the lowest beta were prioritized. Models were compared based on the metrics of the root mean square error (RMSE) and mean absolute error (MAE). The results demonstrate the superiority of the multifactor models (FF3 and FF5) over the CAPM in explaining returns in the analyzed sectors. Specifically, the FF3 model was the most accurate in the financial sector; the FF5 model was the most accurate in the energy and utilities sectors; and the FF4 model, with the SMB factor eliminated in the adjustment of the FF5 model, was the least error-prone. The CAPM’s consistent inferiority highlights the need to consider factors beyond market risk. In conclusion, selecting the most appropriate asset valuation model for the US market depends on each sector’s inherent characteristics, favoring multifactor models. Full article

The global crude oil market, known for its pronounced volatility and nonlinear dynamics, plays a pivotal role in shaping economic stability and informing investment strategies. Contrary to traditional research focused on price forecasting, this study emphasizes the more investor-centric task of predicting returns for West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil. By spotlighting returns, it directly addresses critical investor concerns such as asset allocation and risk management. This study applies advanced machine learning models, including XGBoost, random forest, and neural networks to predict crude oil return, and for the first time, incorporates sustainability and external risk variables, which are shown to enhance predictive performance in capturing the non-stationarity and complexity of financial time-series data. To enhance predictive accuracy, we integrate 55 variables across five dimensions: macroeconomic indicators, financial and futures markets, energy markets, momentum factors, and sustainability and external risk. Among these, the rate of change stands out as the most influential predictor. Notably, XGBoost demonstrates a superior performance, surpassing competing models with an impressive 76% accuracy in direction forecasting. The analysis highlights how the significance of various predictors shifted during the COVID-19 pandemic. This underscores the dynamic and adaptive character of crude oil markets under substantial external disruptions. In addition, by incorporating sustainability factors, the study provides deeper insights into the drivers of market behavior, supporting more informed portfolio adjustments, risk management strategies, and policy development aimed at fostering resilience and advancing sustainable energy transitions. Full article

This study examines the explainability, validity, and applicability of multi-factor models in explaining the returns of Green (eco-friendly), Grey (neutral), and Red (environmentally harmful) EU securities. We apply the Fama–French three-factor and five-factor models, along with the Carhart four-factor model, to analyze changes in risk exposures and adjusted abnormal returns (alphas) before and after the 2009 global financial crisis (GFC). Green and Grey securities exhibit positive SMB loadings, while Grey’s HML shifts from negative to positive over time. Both Green and Red securities show positive SMB and HML factors but negative alphas in the second period, indicating systematic underperformance. Additionally, for Red assets, momentum (MOM), profitability (RMW), and investment (CMA) factors are positive and significant in the first period but become insignificant or negative later. These findings highlight structural shifts in factor exposures and contribute to the ongoing debate on the most suitable classical asset pricing framework for environmentally classified assets, offering insights into the effectiveness of traditional factor models in different classes of environmental assets in finance. Lastly, the three-factor model better captures the common variation in Green and Grey asset returns. Specifically, the 4-factor model and the HML Devil factor prove to be more effective in explaining returns for Red securities. Full article

Timor-Leste is a new country still in the process of economic development and does not yet have a capital market for stock and bond investments. These two asset classes have been invested in international capital markets such as the US, the UK, Japan, and Europe. We examine the performance of the capital asset pricing model (CAPM) and the Fama–French three-factor and five-factor models on the excess returns of Timor-Leste’s equity and bond investments in the international market over the period 2006 to 2019. Our empirical results show that the market factor (MKT) is positively and significantly associated with the excess returns of the CAPM and the Fama–French three-factor and five-factor models. Moreover, the two variables Small Minus Big (SMB) as a size factor and High Minus Low (HML) as a value factor have a negative and significant effect on the excess returns in the Fama–French three-factor model and five-factor model. Further analysis revealed that the explanatory power of the Fama–French five-factor model is that the Robust Minus Weak (RMW) factor as a profitability factor is positively and significantly associated with excess returns, while the Conservative Minus Aggressive (CMA) factor as an investment factor is insignificant. Full article

In recent years, the rapid and significant development of emerging markets has globally led to insight from potential investors and academicians seeking to assess these markets in terms of risk inheritance. Therefore, this study aims to explore the validity and applicability of the capital asset pricing model (henceforth CAPM) and multi-factor models, namely Fama–French models, in Pakistan’s stock market for the period of June 2010–June 2020. This study collects data on 173 non-financial firms listed on the Pakistan stock exchange, namely the KSE-100 index, and follows Fama-MacBeth’s regression methodology for empirical estimation. The empirical findings of this study conclude that small portfolios (small-size companies) earn considerably higher returns than big portfolios (large-size companies). Ultimately, the risk associated with portfolio returns is reported to be higher for small portfolios (small-size companies) than for big portfolios (large-size companies). According to the regression output, the CAPM was found to be valid for explaining the market risk premium above the risk-free rate. Similarly, the FF three-factor model was found to be valid for explaining time-series variation in excess portfolio returns. Later, we added human capital into FF three- and five-factor models. This study found that the human capital base six-factor model outperformed the other competing asset pricing models. The findings of this study indicate that small portfolios (small-size companies) earn more returns than big portfolios (large-size companies) to reward the investor for taking extra risks. Investors may benefit by timing their investments to maximize stock returns. Company investment in human capital adds reliable information, replicates the value of the company and, in the long term, helps investors make rational decisions. Full article

This paper examines the use of the return on gold instead of treasury bills in empirical asset pricing models for the US equity market. It builds upon previous research on the safe-haven, hedging, and zero-beta characteristics of gold in developed markets and the close relationship between interest rates, stock, and gold returns. In particular, we extend this research by showing that using gold as a zero-beta asset helps to improve the time-series performance of asset pricing models when pricing US equities and industries between 1981 and 2015. The performance of gold zero-beta models is also compared with traditional empirical factor models using the 1-month Treasury bill rate as the risk-free rate. Our results indicate that using gold as a zero-beta asset leads to higher R-squared values, lower Sharpe ratios of alphas, and fewer significant pricing errors in the time-series analysis. Similarly, the pricing of small stock and industry portfolios is improved. In cross-section, we also find improved results, with fewer cross-sectional pricing errors and more economically meaningful pricing of risk factors. We also find that a zero-beta gold factor constructed to be orthogonal to the Carhart four factors is significant in cross-section and helps to improve factor model performance on momentum portfolios. Furthermore, the Fama–French three- and five-factor asset pricing models and the Carhart model are all improved by these means, particularly on test assets which have been poorly priced by the traditional versions. Our results have salient implications for policymakers, governments, central bank rate-setting decisions, and investors. Full article

This study empirically tests and compares the performances of three famous financial asset valuation models in the Moroccan stock exchange: CAPM, the Fama and French three-factor model, and the Fama and French five-factor model. Our sample considers monthly data covering the sample period of July 2002 to June 2020. The main findings reveal that the GRS test typically rejects each of the examined model. On the basis of our analysis, we find that the value effect is more pronounced than the size effect. However, profitability and investment effects are almost absent. Regarding the factor spanning tests, the results show that the value factor was not redundant. Beyond this, the size and investment factors are the redundant factors. In Morocco, the market factor is the most powerful factor, perhaps assisted by value and profitability factors. Although the CAPM performs poorly in capturing the variation in Moroccan returns, the market factor continues to play an important role, even after adding other factors. Overall, all the tested models were improved slightly, but leave part of the variation in Moroccan stock returns unexplained. Full article

In this study, the reliability of the Fama–French Three-Factor model (FF3F) and the Carhart Four-Factor model (C4F) is examined thoroughly. In order to determine which of the asset pricing models is the best to explain portfolio returns on the Moroccan share market, these two models are indeed evaluated in the Moroccan market. Additionally, it is worth mentioning that five years of monthly data from the firms that listed on the Casablanca Stock Exchange are used in this research, as well over the period of nine years. The results of this inquiry show that these models barely have a partial hold on the Casablanca Stock Exchange (CSE), which limits their ability to predict the cross-sections of returns. In accordance with this, the C4F model has somewhat greater explanatory power than the FF3F Model. Moreover, our research adds to the body of knowledge by inserting two learned material asset pricing theories to the proof in the market, which is still evolving, and where distinctive anomalistic traits still exist (the CSE). Full article

This study empirically analyzes return data from select energy companies in developed and emerging markets using the Fama-French three- and five-factor asset-pricing models in crisis settings. It researches whether these models are suitable to produce meaningful return data in challenging economic circumstances. We use panel data covering 12 of the largest globally-operating energy companies from Russia, China, the US, the EU, and Saudi Arabia, covering a period between 2000 and 2022. The results undermine the general notion that the usage of available multi-factor asset-pricing models automatically yields meaningful data in all economic situations. The study reiterates the need to reconsider the assumption that the addition of more company-specific factors to regression models automatically yields better results. This study contributes to the existing literature by broadening this research area. It is the first study to specifically analyze the performance of companies from the energy sector in a crisis like the COVID-19 pandemic with the help of the Fama-French three- and five-factor models. Full article

The quest for parsimonious models has been a key objective in asset pricing. However, there appears to be no consensus on the most successful asset pricing strategy in the literature, especially for the South African Market. Using financial statements from January 2000 to December 2015, this article explores how market anomalies affect the performance of securities in the Johannesburg Stock Exchange’s (JSE’s) resources, industrial, and finance sectors. We investigated the efficacy of several asset pricing models and their capacity to account for market anomalies in the JSE’s resources, industrial, and financial sectors, as well as the applicability of the Fama and French five-factor model. The study used multiple regression techniques and applied stationarity and cointegration methods to ensure robust results. Results also suggest that when the FF5FM is implemented, there is statistical significance at the 10% level for the CMA in the resources sector as the value factor disappears. The FF5FM results in the industrial sector show a significance level of 5% in the SMB. The financial sector seems to have the majority of the style-based risk factors as the SMB is positively significant at a 5% level, the HML is significant at a 1% level, and the CMA is negatively significant at a 10% level of significance. The results suggest that the Carhart Four Factor model is the best to use in all market conditions. Results also show that value becomes redundant in a bullish market, but the opposite holds in a bearish market for a model with operating profitably and investing factors. These findings highlight the necessity for investors to determine which investment risk elements produce abnormal returns in both bearish and bullish market circumstances before investing. Full article