Search Results (33)

Trauma-induced heterotopic ossification (tHO) is characterized by aberrant ectopic bone formation in soft tissue following high-energy trauma, affecting >60% of combat-related amputees and >50% of major burn patients. Current prophylactic strategies (including NSAIDs, bisphosphonates, and low-dose radiation) lack mechanistic specificity, carry significant side effects, and surgical excision carries a 27% recurrence rate. This review reframes tHO pathogenesis through the neural–immune axis, arguing that ectopic bone formation is a downstream consequence of dysregulated neuroimmune signaling rather than a primary osteogenic event. Following trauma, nociceptor activation drives nociception-induced neural inflammation (NINI), releasing substance P (SP) and calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), which disrupts the blood–nerve barrier, mobilizes neural crest-derived progenitor cells, and, alongside BMP-2/SMAD1/5/8 signaling and M1-polarized macrophage activation, establishes a permissive osteogenic microenvironment. A BMP-2/CGRP positive feedback loop sustains aberrant osteogenesis, converging on osteogenic transcription factors Runx2, SOX5/6/9, and Osterix. Dysregulated noncoding RNAs represent promising pre-radiographic biomarkers. This neural–immune framework motivates mechanism-based therapeutic strategies targeting CGRP (fremanezumab, erenumab), SP/NK1 signaling (aprepitant), and macrophage polarization (metformin, palovarotene, rapamycin), with multi-node combination approaches tailored to the temporal stages of tHO offering the most promise for precision prophylaxis. Full article

Objective: This retrospective, intention-to-treat real-world study, designed by the Greek Research Alliance for the Study of headache and Pain (GRASP) sought to compare the effectiveness and safety of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (anti-CGRP Mabs) to topiramate in preventing migraine. Patients and methods: Patients received either fremanezumab, erenumab, galcanezumab, eptinezumab, or topiramate for at least six months. Outcomes included reductions in monthly headache days (MHDs), ≥50% and ≥75% responder rates, monthly acute medication intake (MAI), MHDs with peak headache intensity ≥5 on VAS, migraine-related disability (MIDAS, HIT-6), quality of life (EQ-VAS), discontinuation rates and safety. Results: We included 409 migraine patients (median age 45.2 years), predominantly female (80%) and mostly with long-standing disease and high baseline burden. After six months, all treatments reduced MHDs. Mean MHDs decreased by −7.8 days with anti-CGRP Mabs versus −3.8 days with topiramate (p < 0.001). Higher ≥50% and ≥75% responder rates were observed across all anti-CGRP agents, compared to topiramate. Anti-CGRP Mabs also achieved greater reductions in moderate/severe MHDs, MAI, disability metrics, and superior QOL gains. Among the CGRP-targeted therapies, slight differences in effectiveness outcomes were present, though failing to demonstrate any specific superiority. Safety was favorable for anti-CGRP Mabs, whereas topiramate showed substantially higher adverse events and discontinuations. Conclusions: Anti-CGRP Mabs were more effective, produced greater reductions in disability and higher improvements quality-of-life metrics and were better tolerated than topiramate. Differences among individual anti-CGRP agents were modest and unlikely to represent a clinically meaningful superiority, supporting a class-wide benefit vs. topiramate in migraine prevention both in terms of effectiveness and safety. Full article

Background: Monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway, such as erenumab (ERE), are effective migraine-preventive therapies for many patients. Identifying clinical and genetic factors associated with treatment failure is crucial for optimizing patient management. Methods: This multicenter, prospective observational study included patients with episodic or chronic migraine treated with ERE for 12 months. Demographics, migraine history, comorbidities, treatment outcomes, and genetic variants in CGRP receptor-related genes (CALCRL and RAMP1) were evaluated for associations with non-response to ERE, defined as a <50% reduction in monthly migraine days. Results: Of the 140 patients starting ERE, 11 were lost to follow up, 12 stopped ERE due to side effects; 18 patients were non-responders and were compared to 99 responders. Arterial hypertension [adjusted OR (aOR): 7.77, p = 0.007], smoking (aOR: 4.98, p = 0.014), and insomnia requiring medication (aOR: 4.51, p = 0.027) were associated with non-responder status. Genetic analysis revealed a nominal association between the RAMP1 rs6431564 polymorphism and non-responder status (nominal p = 0.025), which did not survive Bonferroni correction. The G allele was linked to a reduced risk (aOR per G allele: 0.28, p = 0.025) and caused the increased expression of RAMP1 in an allele-dose manner. Conclusions: Hypertension, smoking, insomnia requiring medication, and, nominally, the RAMP1 rs6431564 polymorphism were associated with non-responder status to ERE in migraine patients. Further validation of the present results in larger cohorts is needed. Full article

Background/Objectives: The administration of human monoclonal antibodies (mAb) in preclinical pharmacokinetics and toxicology studies often triggers an immune response, leading to the formation of anti-drug antibodies (ADA). To mitigate this effect, we have recently performed and reported on studies using short-term immunosuppressive regimens to induce prolonged immune tolerance towards a human mAb, erenumab, in rats. Here, we report on the development of a semi-mechanistic modeling approach that quantitatively integrates pharmacokinetic and immunogenicity assessments from immune tolerance induction studies to provide a framework for the simulation-based evaluation of different immune induction scenarios for the maintenance of prolonged immune tolerance towards human mAbs. Methods: The integrated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) modeling approach combined a semi-mechanistic model of the adaptive immune system to predict ADA formation kinetics with a population pharmacokinetic model to assess the impact of the time course of the ADA magnitude on the PK of erenumab in rats. Model-derived erenumab concentration–time profiles served as input for a quantitative system pharmacology-style semi-mechanistic model of the adaptive immune system to conceptualize the ADA response as a function of the kinetics of CD4⁺ T helper cells and T regulatory cells. Results: The model adequately described the observed ADA magnitude–time profiles in all treatment groups and reasonably simulated the kinetics of selected immune cells responsible for ADA formation. It also successfully captured the impact of tacrolimus/sirolimus immunomodulation on ADA formation, demonstrating that the regimen effectively suppressed ADA formations and induced immune tolerance. Conclusions: This work demonstrates the utility of modeling approaches to integrate pharmacokinetic and immunogenicity assessment data for the prospective planning of long-term toxicology studies to support the preclinical development of mAbs. Full article

Background: Fremanezumab was the third CGRP antibody available in our hospital. This examination of our experience with fremanezumab is focused on identifying the predictors of response. Methods: This was a prospective observational study in which we included high-frequency episodic/chronic migraine (HF/CM) patients who were prescribed fremanezumab during the year 2023. Our research involved collecting data on their demographic details, diagnoses made, treatments received, prophylactic measures taken in the past, and any comorbid conditions present. The number of headaches was documented for one quarter prior to and after the initiation of fremanezumab. Results: Eighty-nine patients received fremanezumab (86.5% female, 45.8 ± 12.5 years old, 70.1% naive). The headache days decreased from 21.1 ± 7.6 to 12.4 ± 11.2 days during the initial three months of the treatment, and a total of 55 patients (61.8%) exhibited a response rate of ≥50%. Six out of ten patients refractory to erenumab for at least 6 months responded to fremanezumab. Totals of 17 and 26 patients had been treated at least with galcanezumab or erenumab. The elements influencing non-response were as follows: prior failure to respond to both erenumab and galcanezumab (p < 0.0001), HF/CM length (11.9 ± 7.1 years in non-responders vs. 5.8 ± 4.8 in responders; p < 0.001), the presence of fibromyalgia (p < 0.001), anxiety–depression (p < 0.001), an almost daily headache baseline (>28 days/month) (p < 0.0001), and analgesic overuse (p < 0.0001). The response rate was unaffected by age and experience. After a multivariate logistic analysis, almost daily headaches (p < 0.001), a length of HF/CM > 6 years (p = 0.015), and anxiety–depression (p = 0.017) remained significant. Fremanezumab showed excellent tolerance. Conclusions: These real-life results confirm the efficacy of fremanezumab. The main factors associated with a lack of response were almost daily/daily headaches and a disease duration > 6 years. Half of the patients who failed to respond to erenumab improved on fremanezumab, making it sensible to switch to a treatment with a different mechanism of action, but trying a third anti-CGRP treatment in patients with no response to both a receptor-targeted and a ligand-targeted CGRP antibody hardly seems justifiable from our experience. Full article

Background and Objectives: Migraine is a chronic neurological disorder affecting approximately 14% of the global population. Beyond physical pain, migraines significantly impact individuals’ quality of life, influencing education, employment, and income levels. Topiramate, a second-generation antiepileptic medication, has demonstrated notable efficacy in reducing the occurrence of chronic migraine. Over the past three decades, extensive research has implicated the neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in migraine pathogenesis. Erenumab, the first FDA-approved CGRP inhibitor, received approval in 2018. This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of Erenumab and Topiramate for migraine prevention. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults with episodic or chronic migraine over a 12-month period, comparing Erenumab (n = 52) and Topiramate (n = 56). Outcomes assessed included changes in the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) scores from baseline over the last three months of treatment and the proportion of patients achieving a ≥50% reduction in MIDAS scores by the end of the study. Results: The Erenumab group showed significant improvement, with nearly 79% of patients achieving a 50% reduction in their MIDAS score, with a mean reduction of 3.76. Notably, only two patients (3.8.5) discontinued treatment due to adverse events. In contrast, the Topiramate group had over 15% of patients achieve a 50% reduction in MIDAS scores, with a mean reduction of 5.89, and a had discontinuation rate of 14.2% due to adverse events. Conclusions: Both Topiramate and Erenumab are effective for migraine prevention. However, Topiramate has lower tolerability and more side effects, while Erenumab offers better tolerability and safety at a higher cost. Treatment decisions should be individualized based on patient needs, efficacy, safety, and cost considerations. Full article

Background: The advent of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway has transformed the management of migraine, offering newfound optimism for clinicians and individuals with episodic migraine (EM) and chronic migraine (CM). While randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have provided crucial insights into the effectiveness and safety profiles of these treatments, their translation into real-world clinical practice remains a challenge. Objective: This review aims to conduct a comprehensive assessment of real-world studies, offering valuable insights tailored for practical application in clinical settings. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search in PubMed, SCOPUS, and MEDLINE for real-life studies on erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab. Abstracts underwent rigorous screening by two reviewers for relevance. Data extraction from selected articles was performed using a standardized form, with verification by a second reviewer. Data synthesis was narrative, following PRISMA guidelines. Results: Our search included 61 pertinent studies conducted between 2019 and 1 March 2024. Real-world study designs demonstrated notable variability in the selection and inclusion of migraine patients, influenced by factors such as attack frequency, data collection criteria, and primary/secondary objectives. Key findings commonly reported considerable improvements in efficacy outcomes (migraine frequency, analgesic use, pain severity, and disability), high responder rates, and optimal safety and tolerability profiles. Conclusions: Real-world evidence underscores the role of anti-CGRP mAbs as targeted therapies for both CM and EM patients. The overall results indicate that the effectiveness and tolerability of anti-CGRP mAbs in real-world applications may exceed those observed in RCTs, an extraordinary finding in clinical neurology. Full article

This retrospective study assesses the efficacy and tolerability of anti-calcitonin gene-related peptide (anti-CGRP) therapy in adolescents and young adults (ages 12–21) with migraine and chronic daily headaches unresponsive to standard treatments. Migraines in this demographic significantly impair school performance, self-esteem, psychological well-being, and cognitive health. These young patients are also particularly sensitive to the side effects of conventional medications, which are often prescribed off-label and come with high insurance denial rates. Medication overuse, including analgesics, triptans, and NSAIDs, is prevalent due to treatment failures. Elevated plasma CGRP levels observed during migraines suggest that anti-CGRP therapies, successful in adult populations, may also benefit this younger age group. Over a three-year period, patients at a specialized pediatric headache center were evaluated for the impact of anti-CGRP treatments, including monoclonal antibodies (erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab) and small-molecule CGRP receptor antagonists (ubrogepant, rimegepant, and atogepant), administered either alone or in combination with OnabotulinumtoxinA. Data were extracted from the hospital’s electronic medical records, and patient progress was consistently documented using a structured template for each clinic visit. Additional patient satisfaction data were collected via telephone follow-ups and patient message reviews. The study included 23 patients, primarily treated for chronic migraine (CM) (78.3%), with a smaller subset addressing episodic migraine (EM), new daily persistent headaches (NDPHs), and post-traumatic headaches (PTHs). Comprehensive demographic and clinical data, including age, treatment duration, history of preventive treatment failures, and comorbidities like psychiatric conditions and sleep disorders, were collected. Anti-CGRP therapies, particularly when combined with traditional treatments or OnabotulinumtoxinA, resulted in significant improvements: 91.3% of patients experienced reduced migraine duration and intensity, 82.6% reported improvements in other bothersome symptoms, and 73.9% saw an improved response to rescue medications. Additionally, 78.3% of patients reported a reduction in their use of rescue medications per week by more than 50%, and emergency room visits were reduced for 56.5% of patients. Significant reductions in headache days were observed in 82.6% of patients after one month and 87% after three months, with nearly 40% experiencing more than a 50% reduction in both periods. The greatest benefits were observed in patients treated for more than six months. Adverse effects were minimal, with 95.7% of patients reporting no side effects, and patient satisfaction was high, with 69.6% opting to continue treatment. Overall, this study highlights the substantial potential of anti-CGRP therapy in improving outcomes for adolescents and young adults with CM and EM, offering a promising approach for a demographic that faces considerable challenges with conventional treatment options. However, further research is needed to confirm these findings and expand clinical applications in this age group. Full article

Background: Chronic migraine (CM) is a disabling and hard-to-treat condition, associated with high disability and high cost. Among the preventive treatments, botulinum toxin A (BoNT-a) and monoclonal antibodies against the calcitonin gene-related protein (anti-CGRP mAbs) are the only disease-specific ones. The assessment of the disease burden is complex, and among others, tools such as the allodynia symptoms checklist (ASC-12) and headache impact test (HIT-6) are very useful. This exploratory study analysed the impact of these two therapies on migraine burden. Methods: The RAMO study was a multicentre, observational, retrospective investigation conducted in two headache centres: the Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta (Milan) and the Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico (Rome). This study involved patients with chronic migraine treated with mAbs or BoNT-A. We conducted a subgroup exploratory analysis on HIT-6 and ASC-12 scores in the two groups. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Fisher’s exact test, and ANOVA were performed. Results: Of 126 patients, 36 on mAbs and 90 on BoNT-A had at least one available follow-up. mAbs resulted in a mean reduction of −11.1 and −11.4 points, respectively, in the HIT-6 at 6 and 12 months, while BoNT-A was reduced −3.2 and −3.6 points, respectively; the mAbs arm resulted in mean reductions in ASC-12 at 6 and 12 months of follow-up of −5.2 and −6.0 points, respectively, while BoNT-A showed lesser mean changes of −0.5 and −0.9 points, respectively. The adjusted analysis confirmed our results. Conclusions: In this exploratory analysis, anti-CGRP mAbs showed superior effectiveness for HIT-6 and ASC12 compared to BoNT-A. Reductions in terms of month headache days (MHD), migraine disability assessment test (MIDAS), and migraine acute medications (MAM) were clinically relevant for both treatments. Full article

Objective: Phase II/III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are vulnerable to many types of bias beyond randomization. Insights into the reporting quality of RCTs involving migraine patients treated with monoclonal antibodies targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide system (anti-CGRP MAbs) are currently lacking. Our aim was to analyze the reporting quality of phase II/III RCTs involving migraine patients treated with anti-CGRP MAbs. Methods: A systematic search was performed on the PubMed and EMBASE databases, according to PRISMA guidelines, for relevant RCTs in either episodic or chronic migraine prevention. Additionally, an adapted version of the 2010 CONSORT statement checklist was utilized. The ROBvis online tool was used to document the risk of bias. Results: From the initially identified 179 articles, we finally found 31 RCTs that were eligible for evaluation. The average CONSORT compliance was 88.7% (69.7–100%), while 93.5% (N = 29) of the articles had a compliance greater than 75%. Twenty-eight CONSORT items were reported in more than 75% of the articles. The average compliance of the analyzed RCTs was 93.9% for Galcanezumab, 91.3% for Fremanezumab, followed by 85.4% for Erenumab and Eptinezumab studies. Implementation of the ROB2 tool showed some concerning “missing information” arising from the inadequate reporting. Specifically, 50% of the studies (N = 16) were categorized as having inadequate information regarding the randomization process. Conclusions: Adequate reporting quality was disclosed in the evaluated RCTs with anti-CGRP MAbs in migraine prevention. However, some methodological issues need to be highlighted to be addressed in future studies assessing the efficacy of new molecules targeting CGRP or other candidate pathways implicated in migraine pathophysiology. Full article

Cerebral autosomal dominant arteriopathy with subcortical infarcts and leukoencephalopathy (CADASIL) is the most common monogenic form of cerebral small vessel disease, caused by a mutation in the NOTCH3 gene on chromosome 19. The main clinical features include migraine (often with aura), early onset, recurrent subcortical ischemic strokes, mood disturbances, and cognitive impairment, frequently leading to dementia and disability with a reduction in life expectancy. Cerebral chronic global hypoperfusion, due to impaired cerebrovascular reactivity, seems to play a primary role in CADASIL. Migraine is the most common early feature of the disease, and to date, there are no consensus guidelines for treatment. Given the vasomodulatory influence of many antimigraine drugs, there is concern about their use in this disease. In particular, the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) system serves as a vasodilatory protective mechanism during cerebral and cardiac ischemia. Blocking this system could exacerbate ischemic events. Herein, we describe two CADASIL patients who were treated with the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist erenumab for chronic migraine, reporting a significant reduction in the frequency of attacks and intensity of pain, and an improvement in quality of life without adverse effects. Full article

Calcitonin gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies (CGRP mAbs) have shown promising effectiveness in migraine management compared to other preventative treatment options. Many questions remain regarding switching between antibody classes as a treatment option in patients with migraine headaches. This preliminary retrospective real-world study explored the treatment response of patients who switched between CGRP mAb classes due to lack of efficacy or poor tolerability. A total of 53 patients with migraine headache switched between three of the CGRP mAbs types due to lack of efficacy of the original prescribed CGRP mAbs, specifically eptinezumab, erenumab, and galcanezumab. Fremanezumab was not included due to unavailability in the UAE. Galcanezumab and eptinezumab target the CGRP ligand (CGRP/L), while erenumab targets CGRP receptors (CGRP/R). The analysis of efficacy demonstrated that some improvements were seen in both class switch cohorts (CGRP/R to CGRP/L and CGRP/L to CGRP/R). The safety of switching between CGRP classes was well observed, as any adverse events presented before the class switch did not lead to the discontinuation of treatment following the later switch. The findings of this study suggest that switching between different classes of CGRP mAbs is a potentially safe and clinically viable practice that may have some applications for those experiencing side effects on their current CGRP mAb or those witnessing suboptimal response. Full article

Background: Migraine is a neurological disorder characterized by attacks of head pain with prevalent unilateral localization, moderate to high intensity and specifically associated accompanying symptoms. Methods: In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed data regarding 209 patients who had previously been diagnosed with migraine and who were prescribed, between 2019 and 2022, subcutaneous injections of anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) fremanezumab or galcanezumab or anti-CGRP receptors mAb erenumab regardless of the concomitant assumption of any other acute-phase or prophylactic migraine medication. Results: Regarding efficacy, in the 205 analyzed patients, the change from baseline in terms of MIDAS, HIT-6, MMDs and MAD scores was statistically significant for erenumab and galcanezumab, while for fremanezumab a statistical significance was not achieved likely due to the small sample size. In the treated population, 36 patients (17.5%) reported AEs (pain during injection, transient injection site erythema, nausea, constipation and fatigue). Only 5 patients (2.4%) discontinued the treatment for AEs while 15 patients (7.3%) left for lack of efficacy. Conclusions: this retrospective study comes out in favor of both significant efficacy and safety of anti-CGRP and anti-CGRP receptors mAbs in migraine patients. Further methodologically stronger studies are necessary to validate our observation. Full article

Background: Few studies compare the clinical effectiveness of the three anti-CGRP mAbs. Moreover, no studies compare their efficacy during suspension and reprisal. Our study aimed to compare the efficacy of migraine frequency, intensity, and symptomatic medication intake during the first year of therapy, a 1-month suspension period, and a 3-month drug reprisal. Methods: A total of 160 migraineurs (chronic and high-frequency episodic) were treated with anti-CGRP mAbs (49 with fremanezumab, 55 with erenumab, and 55 with galcanezumab) for 12 months. They discontinued the therapy for 1 month and then reprised the therapy. In the three groups, we analyzed and compared the migraine days per month, migraine intensity, and symptomatic medication intake per month at baseline, 3-month, 6-month, and 12-month follow-up. We also compared these variables during the 1-month suspension and 3 months after the reprisal of the therapy. We compared the data and evaluated the response rate (>50% reduction in migraine days per month) at different follow-ups. This comparison was also performed separately for chronic and high-frequency episodic migraineurs. Results: There was no statistical difference in monthly migraine days, intensity, or symptomatic medication intake per month at the different follow-ups. Moreover, there was no difference in the response rate overall. However, in chronic migraineurs treated with galcanezumab, the response rate was higher during the 1-month suspension when compared to fremanezumab and erenumab. In high-frequency episodic migraineurs, fremanezumab had a higher response rate at 12-month follow-up when compared to galcanezumab and erenumab. Conclusions: In our study, the three anti-CGRP mAbs presented a similar response, with no significant differences, during the first year of therapy, the suspension period, and 3 months after the drug reprisal. The response rate during the 1-month suspension period in chronic migraineurs may be higher with galcanezumab. Full article

Migraine preventive treatment with the CGRP-receptor monoclonal antibody Erenumab can positively impact health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and disease-associated disability. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are a valuable additional datapoint to real-world evidence covering how treatment affects physical, mental, and social domains of patients’ lives. In this real-world, single-center retrospective observational cohort study, we analyzed clinical performance indicators and PROMs for migraine patients who failed at least four other preventive medications and received Erenumab over the course of one year. Endpoints were the average monthly migraine days as well as PROMs including the MIDAS, EQ-5D-VAS and PROMIS-29. Data were collected digitally via the software heartbeat ONE in an ambulatory care setting as part of the clinical routine. A total of 145 patients treated with Erenumab provided data for 12 months. After 12 months, the median number of monthly migraine days decreased from 9 to 7 days. A clinically relevant reduction in migraine days by ≥30% was reported by 40% of the patients. The migraine-specific MIDAS score, the EQ-5D-VAS measuring the overall health status and all PROMIS domains, except sleep disturbance, changed significantly, reflecting a positive disease progression. This study highlights how patients with a treatment-resistant migraine in an outpatient setting benefit from a preventive treatment with Erenumab. A decrease in migraine days and an increase in HRQoL was maintained over one year. It also underscores the significance of collecting real-world evidence, including PROMs, as an integral component of the healthcare cycle, as such data can reveal additional factors relevant to treatment. Full article