Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (4)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = cuesta range

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
16 pages, 21475 KB  
Article
Palynostratigraphy of the “Muschelkalk Sedimentary Cycle” in the NW Iberian Range, Central Spain
by Manuel García-Ávila, Soledad García-Gil and José B. Diez
Geosciences 2025, 15(8), 299; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences15080299 - 4 Aug 2025
Viewed by 1411
Abstract
The Muschelkalk sedimentary cycle in the northwestern region of the Iberian Range (central Spain) lies within a transitional area between the Iberian and Hesperia type Triassic domains. To improve the understanding of its paleopalynological record, fifty samples were analyzed from ten stratigraphic sections [...] Read more.
The Muschelkalk sedimentary cycle in the northwestern region of the Iberian Range (central Spain) lies within a transitional area between the Iberian and Hesperia type Triassic domains. To improve the understanding of its paleopalynological record, fifty samples were analyzed from ten stratigraphic sections corresponding to the Tramacastilla Dolostones Formation (TD Fm.), Cuesta del Castillo Sandstones and Siltstones Formation (CCSS Fm.), and Royuela Dolostones, Marls and Limestones Formation (RDML Fm.). Despite previous studies in the area, palynological data remain scarce or insufficiently detailed, highlighting the need for a systematic reassessment. Based on the identified palynological assemblages, the succession is assigned to an age spanning from the Fassanian to the Longobardian, with a possible extension into the base of the Julian (early Carnian). The results confirm that the siliciclastic unit (CCSS) represents a lateral facies change with respect to the carbonate formations of the upper Muschelkalk (TD and RDML). From a paleoecological perspective, the assemblages indicate a warm and predominantly dry environment, dominated by xerophytic conifers, although evidence of more humid local environments, such as marshes or coastal plains, is also observed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Sedimentology, Stratigraphy and Palaeontology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

23 pages, 35351 KB  
Article
Geological and Geomorphological Characterization of the Anthropogenic Landslide of Pie de la Cuesta in the Vitor Valley, Arequipa, Peru
by Rosmery Infa, Antenor Chavez, Jorge Soto, Joseph Huanca, Gioachino Roberti, Brent Ward, Rigoberto Aguilar and Teresa Teixidó
Geosciences 2024, 14(11), 291; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences14110291 - 31 Oct 2024
Viewed by 3675
Abstract
This study presents the geological and geomorphological characterization of the Pie de la Cuesta landslide, a large (>60 ha) slow-moving (up 4.5 m/month) landslide in Southern Peru. The landslide has been active since 1975 and underwent a significant re-activation in 2016; the mass [...] Read more.
This study presents the geological and geomorphological characterization of the Pie de la Cuesta landslide, a large (>60 ha) slow-moving (up 4.5 m/month) landslide in Southern Peru. The landslide has been active since 1975 and underwent a significant re-activation in 2016; the mass movement has caused the loss of property and agricultural land and it is currently moving, causing further damage to property and land. We use a combination of historical aerial photographs, satellite images and field work to characterize the landslide’s geology and geomorphology. The landslide is affecting the slope of the Vitor Valley, constituted by a coarsening upward sedimentary sequence transitioning from layers of mudstone and gypsum at the base, to sandstone and conglomerate at the top with a significant ignimbrite layer interbedded within conglomerates near the top of the sequence. The landslide is triggered by an irrigation system that provides up to 10 L/s of water infiltrating the landslide mass. This water forms two groundwater levels at lithological transitions between conglomerates and mudstones, defining the main failure planes. The landslide is characterized by three main structural domains defined by extension, translation and compression deformation regimes. The extensional zone, near the top of the slope, is defined by a main horst–graben structure that transitions into the translation zone defined by toppling and disaggregating blocks that eventually become earth flows that characterize the compressional zone at the front of the landslides, defined by thrusting structures covering the agricultural land at the valley floor. The deformation rates range from 8 cm/month at the top of the slope to 4.5 m/month within the earth flows. As of May 2023, 22.7 ha of potential agricultural land has been buried. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2306 KB  
Article
The Khadzhokh Canyon System—An Important Geosite of the Western Caucasus
by Anna V. Mikhailenko, Dmitry A. Ruban and Vladimir A. Ermolaev
Geosciences 2020, 10(5), 181; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences10050181 - 14 May 2020
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 4012
Abstract
True diversity of geological heritage sites (geosites) is yet to be fully understood. New field studies of the Khadzhokh Canyon and its vicinities in the Western Caucasus (Mountainous Adygeya tourist destination, southwestern Russia) have allowed characterizing its geoheritage. Multiple unique features are assigned [...] Read more.
True diversity of geological heritage sites (geosites) is yet to be fully understood. New field studies of the Khadzhokh Canyon and its vicinities in the Western Caucasus (Mountainous Adygeya tourist destination, southwestern Russia) have allowed characterizing its geoheritage. Multiple unique features are assigned to geomorphological, stratigraphical, paleontological, palaeogeographical, sedimentary, tectonic, hydro(geo)logical, and coupled economical and geoexplorationgeoheritage types. This geoheritage is highlycomplex, and its rank is national. The unique features include (but not limited to) three canyons, Triassic stratigraphical sections, Late Jurassic coral reef, megaclast accumulations, chevron folds, and waterfalls. The geoheritage is distributed along the Khadzhokh Canyon and its branches. The configuration of thisgeositemakes it possible to propose a new category, namely dendritic geosites distinguished by continuous occurrence of geoheritage via branching stripes. Such geosites can be either natural (determined by dendritic drainage network and deep valley incision) or anthropogenic (determined by dendritic road network with lengthy road cuttings). In the former case, geosites are also geomorphosites and host viewpoint geosites. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

8 pages, 2317 KB  
Communication
Unusual Isolated Large Clasts from the Periphery of the Lagonaki Highland, Western Caucasus: New Evidence of Classification and Origin
by Dmitry A. Ruban
Geosciences 2018, 8(11), 413; https://doi.org/10.3390/geosciences8110413 - 12 Nov 2018
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2672
Abstract
Large clasts are in focus of the modern geoscience research, but their broadly-accepted classification is absent and specialists tend to over-emphasize on clasts of coastal zones. New field investigations in the Western Caucasus have permitted the finding of isolated large clasts of carbonate [...] Read more.
Large clasts are in focus of the modern geoscience research, but their broadly-accepted classification is absent and specialists tend to over-emphasize on clasts of coastal zones. New field investigations in the Western Caucasus have permitted the finding of isolated large clasts of carbonate composition that occur above the Early–Middle Jurassic shale sequence and that are covered by modern soils. These clasts can be determined either as large boulders or megaclasts (blocks) depending on the preferred classification. Their shape is chiefly irregular, although smoothened surfaces and rounded angles (resulting from previous karstification) are also registered. These large clasts are located quite far from the natural outcrops of the Late Jurassic carbonates, which are their parent rocks. The origin of these clasts can be linked to collapses of the Pleistocene cliff of a cuesta-type mountain range, which later retreated to its present position. The evidence from the study area implies the size of 1 m or 2 m as a plausible criterion for distinction of boulders and megaclasts, and it also makes claims towards the development of a wider genetic typology of megaclasts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Biogeosciences)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop