Search Results (59)

Background and Objectives: Thrombocytopenia and hemolytic anemia are common but non-criteria manifestations of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). However, their relationship with specific immunological profiles remains poorly characterized. This study aimed to evaluate these hematologic manifestations and identify their serological associations in patients with APS. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 346 patients diagnosed with APS. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics were analyzed. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors associated with hemolytic anemia. Results: The mean age was 47.1 ± 13.1 years, and 71.7% were female. Thrombocytopenia was present in 34.5%, and hemolytic anemia in 16.5% of patients. Lupus anticoagulant (LAC) was the most common antibody (66.8%). In univariate analysis, hemolytic anemia was significantly associated with LAC positivity (OR 4.216, 95% CI: 2.326–7.640, p < 0.001), anticardiolipin IgG (OR 7.170, p = 0.007), triple positivity (OR 3.638, p = 0.002), and diabetes mellitus (OR 2.084, p = 0.007). DIAPS showed a protective trend (OR 0.547, p = 0.002). In multivariate analysis, only LAC remained an independent risk factor for hemolytic anemia (adjusted OR 3.557, 95% CI: 1.355–9.335, p = 0.003). Conclusions: LAC positivity is an independent predictor of hemolytic anemia in APS. These findings suggest a distinct immunologic profile among patients with hematologic involvement and highlight the need for further investigation into non-criteria manifestations. Full article

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disorder characterized by venous and arterial thrombosis and obstetric complications, driven by antiphospholipid antibodies (APLAs). This review synthesizes the latest advancements and current understanding, diagnosis, and treatment of APS. APLAs, including lupus anticoagulant (LAC), anticardiolipin (aCL), and anti-β2-glycoprotein I (aβ2-GPI), interfere with coagulation and endothelial function, as well as with placental health. APS can be primary or secondary; it is often associated with systemic autoimmune diseases like lupus. The pathogenesis of APS remains only partially understood. APLAs promote thrombosis through endothelial damage, platelet activation, and inflammatory signaling pathways. Laboratory diagnosis relies on persistent positivity for APLAs and LAC through tests like ELISA and clotting assays, following a three-step confirmation process. New integrated test systems have been introduced to improve standardization. Classification criteria have evolved, with the 2023 EULAR-ACR criteria providing a weighted, domain-based scoring system, enhancing diagnostic precision. Catastrophic APS (CAPS) is a severe, rare manifestation of APS, characterized by multi-organ failure due to rapid, widespread microthrombosis and systemic inflammation, which requires urgent anticoagulation. Seronegative APS is proposed for patients with clinical features of APS but negative standard antibody tests, possibly due to non-criteria antibodies or transient immunosuppression. Treatment primarily involves long-term anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists; direct oral anticoagulants are generally not recommended. APS diagnosis and management remain complex due to clinical heterogeneity and laboratory challenges. Continued refinement of diagnostic tools and criteria is essential for improving outcomes in this life-threatening condition. Full article

Assessment for the presence or absence of lupus anticoagulant (LA) represents a common investigation in hemostasis laboratories. In particular, LA represents one of the laboratory criteria for the diagnosis of definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). The other laboratory criteria are the solid phase assays (anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-β2Glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI) antibodies of IgG and IgM isotypes). Current International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH) guidance recommends testing LA by at least two tests based on different principles, with the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and dilute Russell viper venom time (dRVVT) being preferred. Additional assays may be used in addition, or instead of these assays in particular situations. For example, aPTT and dRVVT assays are very sensitive to the presence of various anticoagulants, and this may lead to false-positive identification of LA. This is particularly problematic in the age of the DOACs (direct oral anticoagulants), which are now the leading anticoagulants in use worldwide. We review recent literature on LA testing as well as our local practice to provide an update on this common test procedure. Our experience should be useful for laboratories struggling with LA interpretation for diagnosis or exclusion of APS. Full article

Severe COVID-19 is often associated with coagulopathy and thrombotic complications. The underlying mechanisms are complex and multifactorial, involving platelet activation, dysregulation of the complement cascade, fibrinolytic imbalance, release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, immunothrombosis, antiphospholipid antibodies, and alterations in the von Willebrand factor (vWF)/ADAMTS13 axis. These pathways are also implicated in thrombotic microangiopathies (TMAs), characterized by endothelial injury and widespread microvascular thrombosis. In this prospective monocentric observational study, we investigated whether COVID-19-associated coagulopathy meets the criteria for TMA and evaluated the roles of complement activation and vWF/ADAMTS13 imbalance in disease severity. Forty-three hospitalized COVID-19 patients were enrolled and stratified by disease severity. Blood samples collected at admission were analyzed for hematologic, coagulation, inflammatory, and complement parameters. A 30-day follow-up recorded survival and thrombotic events. All patients showed elevated vWF and factor VIII levels; however, only vWF collagen-binding activity (vWF-CBA) significantly correlated with disease severity. ADAMTS13 activity remained above 60% in all cases, and no schistocytes were detected, arguing against a diagnosis of classical TMA. Nevertheless, the vWF-CBA/ADAMTS13 ratio was significantly higher in severe cases, particularly in unvaccinated individuals, suggesting endothelial dysregulation. Complement analysis revealed increased C5a levels and decreased C3b/iC3b ratios in severe disease, consistent with complement activation and consumption. C2 levels were also lower in these patients. Although complement activation and vWF/ADAMTS13 imbalance did not directly correlate, both pathways showed a similar trend according to disease severity. Overall, our findings indicate that COVID-19-related coagulopathy does not fulfill the criteria for classical TMA but shows features of complement-mediated endothelial injury and vWF dysregulation. The vWF-CBA may serve as a rapid, standardized tool for assessing endothelial dysfunction. Activation of the complement system, particularly via the lectin and alternative pathways, appears central to the prothrombotic state in severe COVID-19. Full article

(1) Background: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is associated with thrombotic events and the laboratory identification of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL), in which lupus anticoagulant (LA), anticardiolipin (aCL), and anti-β2 glycoprotein I antibodies are included. The aim of the current retrospective study is to examine clinical characteristics and risk factors of ischemic stroke as a clinical manifestation of APS. (2) Methods: Adult patients diagnosed with APS between 1 January 2009 and 1 June 2024 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Sydney-revised Sapporo criteria were used for the diagnosis of APS, while ischemic stroke was diagnosed based on the acute onset of focal neurologic deficits and confirmed with radiological findings. (3) Results: We studied 115 patients with APS. Specifically, 28 (24.35%) patients, with a mean age (standard deviation) of 54 (±12.5), had ischemic stroke as a clinical manifestation of APS. In univariate analysis, stroke development was associated with the following factors: age (p < 0.001), livedo reticularis (p = 0.046), avascular necrosis (AVN) (p = 0.046), hypertension (p < 0.001), dyslipidemia (p = 0.013), aCL IgG (U/L) antibodies title (p = 0.035), and adjusted global APS score (aGAPSS) (p = 0.047), while in multivariate analysis, it was associated with age (p = 0.006), hypertension (p < 0.001), AVN (p = 0.006), livedo reticularis (p = 0.035), aCL IgG title (p = 0.004), and aGAPSS (p = 0.002). (4) Conclusions: Stroke is a common initial manifestation of APS, with cardiovascular risk factors, particularly hypertension, being highly prevalent. Full article

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) can affect the kidneys, leading to renal artery and vein thrombosis, allograft loss following transplantation, and microvascular damage referred to as aPL-nephropathy (aPL-N). APL-N is a complex and frequently underdiagnosed condition characterized by an incomplete understanding of its etiopathogenesis and associated with unfavorable renal outcomes. The 2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for APS included aPL-N within the microvascular domain. The gold standard for aPL-N is the biopsy, revealing lesions associated with acute thrombotic microangiopathy and chronic vascular changes. Nevertheless, reluctance for biopsies due to anticoagulation and thrombocytopenia underscores the need for noninvasive diagnostics. Common clinical features include hypertension, microscopic hematuria, proteinuria, and renal insufficiency. Antiphospholipid antibodies seem crucial to kidney damage through thrombotic and inflammatory processes. Studies and experimental models of thrombotic microangiopathy lesions suggest the involvement of the complement cascade, tissue factor, and mammalian target of the rapamycin complex activation pathway. Currently, the management of aPL-N is based mainly on expert opinion, with limited evidence supporting the use of anticoagulants, leading to controversy in their application. Treatment may include heparin, intravenous immunoglobulin, plasma exchange, and targeted therapies tailored to aPL-N mechanisms. Future multicenter studies are essential to clarify their roles. The goal of this review is to inform clinicians and create a research agenda to address the unmet needs in diagnosing and managing APL-N. Full article

Background/Objectives: Retinal vein occlusion (RVO) represents a common ophthalmological disorder that, if untreated, often leads to severely impaired vision. The classic vascular risk factors, aging and glaucoma, represent the core pathogenic factors for RVO. However, antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) has been involved in a non-negligible number of patients with RVO. The main objective of the present study was to assess the performance of the new 2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for APS in a cohort of patients with RVO fulfilling the Sydney classification criteria. Methods: A prospective study of consecutive patients with RVO diagnosed with APS in a third-level university hospital. The new 2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for APS were applied to all patients. Vascular risk factors, the antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) profile, clinical management, and clinical outcomes were assessed and compared between those fulfilling the Sydney and the 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria. Results: Sixty-nine RVO-APS patients were included in the study. After applying the new classification criteria, 18 patients (26.1%) did not fulfill the new criteria for APS. Specifically, 17 (24.6%) were excluded due to the new Domain 8 (p < 0.001) as they presented only aPL IgM serology, and 1 patient (1.4%) was excluded due to having high venous thromboembolic risk (VTE) with a clinical domain score < 3. Interestingly enough, the presence of high arterial risk (45.1% vs. 50%; p = 0.72) was greater than the presence of high VTE (3.9% vs. 5.6%; p = 0.99); in both cases, the 51 RVO-APS patients were classified with the 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria, and the 18 cases were excluded according to the new classification criteria. Except for the expected differences in serological domains (Domain 7, p < 0.001, and Domain 8, p < 0.001), we did not find other significant differences in terms of prognosis or risk of recurrence between both groups of patients. Conclusions: The implementation of the new ACR/EULAR 2023 classification criteria for APS resulted in the exclusion of about one out of four previously diagnosed RVO-APS patients. The higher prevalence of manifestations of high arterial risk compared with high VTE among both newly classified and excluded APS patients highlights the importance of monitoring cardiovascular risk factors for both the prevention and the management of potential retinal and cardiovascular events. Full article

Introduction: The classification of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) comprises clinical criteria (vascular thrombosis or obstetric complications throughout life) and laboratory criteria (antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) positivity, confirmed at least twice at 12-week interval). Methods: In 100 patients admitted to the hospital with COVID-19 pneumonia, thrombosis and pregnancy complications were recorded during the hospital stay and in personal medical history. They were tested for nine types of aPLs at four time points (admission, deterioration, discharge, and 3-month follow-up): anticardiolipin (aCL), anti-β2-glycoproteinI (anti-β2GPI), and antiphosphatidylserine/prothrombin (aPS/PT) isotypes IgM/IgG/IgA. Results: During hospitalization, aPLs were detected at least once in 51% of patients. All 7% of deceased patients tested negative for aPLs upon admission, and only one patient became aCL IgG positive as his condition worsened. In 83.3% of patients, intrahospital thrombosis was not related to aPLs. One patient with pulmonary artery and cerebral artery thrombosis was given an APS diagnosis (triple aPLs positivity on admission, double on follow-up). Personal anamnesis (PA) for thromboembolism was verified in 10 patients, all of whom tested negative for aPLs at admission; however, transition to aPLs positivity at discharge (as the disease subsided) was seen in 60% of patients: three of six with arterial thrombosis (at follow-up, two did not appear, and one was negativized) and three of four with deep vein thrombosis (one was confirmed at follow-up and diagnosed with APS, one was negativized, and one did not appear). At admission, the majority of the aPLs were of the aCL IgG class (58.8%). Unexpectedly, as the COVID-19 disease decreased, anti-β2GPI IgG antibodies (linked with thromboses) became newly positive at discharge (14.9%), as confirmed at follow-up (20.8%). Conclusion: The incidence of APS in our cohort was 2.0%, whereas in the general population, it ranges from 0.001% to 0.002%. The incidence might have increased even more if the four aPLs-positive patients with intrahospital thrombosis/history of thrombosis had attended follow-up. Recommendation: All patients with severe COVID-19 or post-COVID syndrome should be evaluated for current/previous thrombosis and tested for aPLs at least twice: at admission to the hospital and at discharge, then retested 3 months later in positive cases in order to be given the appropriate therapy. Full article

Women with adverse pregnancy outcomes suggestive of obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (OAPS), but not fulfilling clinical and/or laboratory international classification criteria, are increasingly recognized both in clinical practice and in the literature. This entity is termed non-criteria OAPS (NC-OAPS). It includes clinical scenarios such as two unexplained pregnancy losses, three non-consecutive pregnancy losses, late pre-eclampsia/eclampsia/signs of placental insufficiency, or recurrent implantation failure, as well as positive low-titers of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) and non-classical aPLs. To address the NC-OAPS heterogeneity, a nomenclature proposal was developed. In recent years, retrospective and prospective cohort studies have been designed to clarify the characteristics and outcomes of the different subsets of NC-OAPS. In general, the studies support that NC-OAPS may benefit from treatment with antithrombotic, anticoagulant and/or immunomodulator agents, but several considerations must be made on the robustness and nuances of the scientific evidence. The objective of this review is to critically analyze the available evidence supporting the diagnosis of NC-OAPS, categorize its subsets, and evaluate the impact of treatment strategies on its outcome. We also remark on questions that are still unanswered, such as the lack of consensus on diagnostic criteria or treatment protocols. Full article

Background: Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a rare systemic autoimmune disease characterized by persistent antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) in combination with recurrent thrombosis in the veins and/or arteries, obstetric morbidity, and various non-thrombotic associated complications. APS can be primary, as an isolated condition, or secondary in the context of another autoimmune disease, especially systemic lupus erythematosus. This comprehensive clinical review aims to summarize the current understanding of APS pathogenesis, diagnostic approaches, and treatment strategies for this unique clinical entity. Methods: A comprehensive review of the existing literature on APS was conducted, focusing on pathophysiological mechanisms, current diagnostic criteria, and therapeutic approaches. Results: APS pathogenesis involves complex interactions between aPL, phospholipid-binding proteins, and the coagulation cascade. Apart from the cardinal features of thrombosis and APS-related obstetric morbidity, APS is associated with a wide spectrum of clinical manifestations. Diagnosis remains challenging due to overlapping symptoms with other conditions, and clinicians should maintain a high index of suspicion in order to set the diagnosis. The recently published 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria although not definitive for clinical decision-making, these criteria offer clinicians a valuable tool to aid in determining whether further investigation for APS is warranted. Continued refinement of these criteria through ongoing feedback and updates is anticipated. Treatment strategies center on anticoagulation, but individualized approaches are necessary. Conclusions: Early diagnosis and multidisciplinary management of APS are critical to reducing morbidity and improving outcomes. Moreover, familiarization with the 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria is encouraged, recognizing that ongoing feedback and updates will contribute to their ongoing refinement and improvement. While VKAs remain the mainstay of treatment for most APS patients further research is needed to optimize treatment strategies and deepen our understanding of APS’s underlying disease mechanisms. Full article

Background: The clinical and laboratory features of patients with non-criteria obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (NC-OAPS), as well as their pregnancy outcomes and ideal treatment are not clearly determined. The aim of this study is to describe the characteristics and outcomes of pregnancies in NC-OAPS and compare them with an obstetric APS (OAPS) cohort. Methods: This is a retrospective study conducted on a cohort of women referred to a high-risk obstetric unit of a tertiary hospital. Women that were classified as having OAPS or NC-OAPS were included and compared in terms of clinical and laboratory characteristics, management, and subsequent pregnancy outcomes. Results: We identified 107 women with 143 pregnancies, 91 with NC-OAPS and 16 with OAPS. There were no differences in demographic features between both groups. Women with NC-OAPS were more likely to have recurrent implantation failure and were predominantly positive for a single antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) subtype. Both groups were treated similarly (low dose aspirin plus low molecular weight heparin in 87.4% of NC-OAPS and 83.3% of OAPS, p > 0.05). Live birth rate (82.4% and 75.0%, respectively, p > 0.05) and adverse pregnancy outcomes (31.6% vs. 37.5%, p > 0.05) in subsequent pregnancies during follow-up were also similar between groups. Conclusions: This study revealed differences in the previous pregnancy morbidity and aPL profiles in women with NC-OAPS and OAPS, although the therapeutic approach and the outcomes of subsequent pregnancies were similar in both groups. Full article

Objectives: Current guidelines recommend systematic screening for rheumatic diseases (RDs), including antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). However, these recommendations are based on limited evidence, as data on the prevalence of RD in this specific population remain scarce. In particular, the impact of the recent update to the ACR/EULAR classification criteria for APS on the prevalence of RD among RPL patients has yet to be clarified. To address these gaps, this study aims to (i) assess the impact of the 2023 ACR/EULAR APS classification criteria in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL); and (ii) analyze the prevalence of RD in these patients. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study at Rennes University Hospital. From January 2010 to December 2021, all patients referred to the Clinical Immunology Department for RPL were included. Patients were eligible if they had undergone a full RPL evaluation, according to guidelines. Results: We included 165 women with RPL. APS according to the Sydney criteria was found in 24 (14.5%) patients. No significant differences in obstetric history or clinical signs were observed between APS-positive and APS-negative individuals. Only two patients fulfilled the updated 2023 APS criteria, resulting in 163 (98.8%) patients being classified as having unexplained recurrent pregnancy loss (uRPL). Among them, 108 had a new pregnancy following uRPL, resulting in 87 (81%) live births and 21 (19%) recurrent miscarriages. We did not identify any prognostic factor associated with subsequent pregnancy outcomes, including the patients’ antiphospholipid biological profile. We found a prevalence of non-APS RD of only 2.4% in the study population, including systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, and Behçet’s disease. Conclusions: APS was identified in 14.5% of the patients based on the former Sydney criteria and 1.2% according to the revised criteria. The lack of clinical differences between APS and non-APS patients aligns with previously reported limitations of the Sydney criteria in accurately identifying aPLA-related RPL. According to the rarity of APS as per the updated criteria, future large collaborative trials will be needed to further characterize APS-related RPL patients and to determine the best treatment strategy for future pregnancies. Full article

Background/Objectives: Schizophrenia (SZ) is a complex psychiatric disorder with increasing evidence pointing to an autoimmune component, including the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs). This study aims to assess the prevalence of anticardiolipin (aCL) and anti-beta-2 glycoprotein I (aβ2GPI) antibodies, particularly the IgG, IgA, and IgM isotypes, in drug-free SZ patients compared to healthy controls, and explore their possible involvement in the disease’s pathophysiology. Methods: Eighty SZ patients meeting DSM-IV criteria were recruited, along with 80 matched healthy controls. Serum samples were analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) to quantify IgG, IgA, and IgM isotypes of aCL and aβ2GPI. Results: SZ patients exhibited significantly higher levels of aCL-IgM and aCL-IgA (p < 0.05), as well as elevated aβ2GPI-IgA (22.5%, p < 0.001), compared to controls. No significant differences were observed in the aCL-IgG isotype. Interestingly, 72% of aPL-positive SZ patients were positive for aβ2GPI-IgA, with some also co-expressing multiple isotypes, suggesting a potential link between SZ and antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Conclusions: This study is the first to report a high prevalence of aCL-IgA and aβ2GPI-IgA in SZ patients, highlighting a possible autoimmune involvement in the disease. The presence of multiple aPL isotypes, particularly IgA, suggests a need for further investigation into their role in SZ pathogenesis and their potential association with APS. Full article

Background/Objectives: ACR/EULAR has recently developed new classification criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). The present study aims to analyze the impact of these new 2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria in a cohort of pregnant women with primary APS. Methods: Retrospective cohort study of 93 consecutive pregnant women attending the Autoimmune Diseases Pregnancy Clinic, a multidisciplinary unit of a tertiary care teaching hospital, between 2005 and 2023. All of them fulfilled the Sydney classification criteria for APS. Women diagnosed with rheumatic autoimmune diseases other than APS were excluded. Results: Twenty-four out of ninety-three patients (25.8%) met the 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria for APS. Patients who met the new classification criteria were very similar to those who did not, except for being younger (p < 0.001), and had a lower number of clinical pregnancies (p = 0.004). The obstetric domain was clearly underrepresented in women who fulfilled the 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria (p < 0.001). Patients meeting the new classification criteria were primarily characterized by preterm births before 34 weeks due to severe placentation disorders (p = 0.004). Women with early and late fetal loss were significantly underrepresented (p < 0.0001 and 0.03, respectively). Nearly half of these patients had thrombocytopenia (p < 0.001). Serologically, these patients showed a higher frequency of persistent lupus anticoagulant (p = 0.02) and a lower frequency of IgM isotype antiphospholipid antibodies (p = 0.05). Conclusions: Almost three-quarters of the patients included in the study did not meet the 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria. Most patients who could not be classified according to these new classification criteria were those with early and/or late fetal deaths, as well as patients carrying only IgM aCL/AB2GPI antibodies. The high specificity of the 2023 ACR/EULAR criteria, restricted to severe placentation disorders, may leave the majority of patients with obstetric APS out of the new classification criteria. Full article

Background: Antiphospholipid antibody (aPL) testing is critical for the classification of antiphospholipid syndrome. The 2023 ACR/EULAR classification criteria recommend the use of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs) and specific thresholds for aPL positivity. Since non-ELISA methods are increasingly used, we compared and evaluated ELISA and non-ELISA aPL assays in a real-world maximum care hospital setting. Methods: Between January 2021 and June 2024, anticardiolipin (aCL; IgG and IgM) and anti-beta2 glycoprotein I (aß2GPI; IgG and IgM) antibodies were measured using ELISA (n = 5115) and a chemiluminescence-based automated immunoassay (CLIA) (n = 3820). Results of parallel testing were compared, and associations with clinical and laboratory characteristics were evaluated. Results: A total of 946 samples were tested using ELISA and CLIA in parallel. A total of 136 (14%) specimens were positive for at least one aPL, and 55 (6%) specimens were from patients diagnosed with APS. Among the latter, 47 (85%) and 41 (75%) patients were positive when ELISA- or CLIA-based aPL assays were used, respectively. After applying the >40 units threshold of the new classification criteria, the number of aPL-positive specimens was significantly lower. In the entire cohort, the agreement between ELISA and CLIA aPL assays was acceptable only for aß2GPI IgG; the results from the two methods did not agree for aCL IgG/IgM and aß2GPI IgM. In APS patients, the agreement between ELISA and CLIA aPL assays was acceptable for aß2GPI IgG and IgM but poor for aCL IgG and IgM. Antibody levels in APS patients were significantly higher using CLIA compared to ELISA. Conclusions: The method-dependent discrepancies between ELISA- and CLIA-based aPL assays regarding the quantitative and qualitative results are substantial. Both methods are suitable for APS classification, but the choice of aPL assay may influence the classification, and therefore, aPL results should be interpreted carefully in the clinical context. Full article