Search Results (26)

Background/Objectives: Precise implant positioning is critical for successful prosthetic rehabilitation, particularly in completely edentulous patients where anatomical landmarks are lost. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of implant placement in the edentulous maxilla and mandible using computer-assisted planning and a bone-supported stackable surgical guide protocol. Methods: This retrospective clinical study included 15 completely edentulous patients who received a total of 60 implants. A dual-scan protocol was utilized for planning. The surgical protocol involved a base guide fixed to the bone with pins, serving as a rigid foundation for stackable components used for osteotomy and implant insertion. Postoperative CBCT scans were superimposed onto the preoperative plan to calculate angular deviations, 3D linear deviations at the implant neck and apex, and depth deviations. Results: The analysis demonstrated high accuracy with a mean angular deviation of 1.25° ± 0.80°. The mean 3D linear deviation was 0.96 ± 0.57 mm at the implant neck and 1.07 ± 0.56 mm at the apex. Depth deviation showed a mean discrepancy of 0.37 ± 0.58 mm. All measured parameters were statistically significantly lower (p < 0.05) than the pre-established clinical safety thresholds. Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, the bone-supported stackable surgical guide protocol proved to be a highly accurate method for full-arch rehabilitation. By eliminating mucosal resilience and ensuring rigid fixation, this approach enables predictable implant placement and facilitates the passive fit of screw-retained bar-supported prostheses, representing a reliable alternative to dynamic navigation in daily clinical practice. Full article

Background: Reconstruction of the maxilla and midface remains one of the most demanding challenges in craniofacial surgery, requiring precise planning and a clear understanding of defect geometry to achieve functional and esthetic restoration. Advances in computer-assisted surgery (CAS) and virtual surgical planning (VSP), based on 3D segmentation of radiologic imaging, have significantly improved the management of maxillary deformities, allowing for further knowledge of patient-specific information, including anatomy, pathology, surgical planning, and reconstructive issues. The integration of computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) and 3D printing has further transformed reconstruction through customized titanium meshes, implants, and surgical guides. Methods:This systematic review, conducted following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, synthesizes evidence from clinical studies on CAD/CAM-assisted reconstruction of maxillary and midfacial defects of congenital, acquired, or post-resection origin. It highlights the advantages and drawbacks of maxillary reconstruction with patient-specific implants (PSISs). Primary outcomes are represented by accuracy in VSP reproduction, while secondary outcomes included esthetic results, functions, and assessment of complications. Results: Of the 44 identified articles, 10 met inclusion criteria with a time frame from April 2013 to July 2022. The outcomes of 24 treated patients are reported. CAD/CAM-guided techniques seemed to improve osteotomy accuracy, flap contouring, and implant adaptation. Conclusions: Although current data support the efficacy and safety of CAD/CAM-based approaches, limitations persist, including high costs, technological dependency, and variable long-term outcome data. This article critically evaluates the role of PSISs in maxillofacial reconstruction and outlines future directions for its standardization and broader adoption in clinical practice. Full article

Purpose: The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the precision of dental implant placements using augmented reality (AR)-iPhone (Apple, Cupertino, CA, USA) navigation technology versus conventional 3D-printed surgical guides. The accuracy was assessed by comparing the actual implant positions to their predefined three-dimensional (3D) locations in surgical plans using the Exocad software (Exocad, Dormstadt, Germany). Materials and Methods: Fourteen standardized mandibular models were divided into two groups: AR-guided (AR1-AR7) and 3D-printed surgical guide-assisted (Group 1–7). Each model received four implants in positions 35, 32, 42, and 45. Postoperative CBCT scans were aligned with the preoperative plans in the Exocad software to measure three-dimensional deviations, including total entry error, total apex error, and angular error. Statistical analysis was performed using the Statistica 12 software (StatSoft, Tulsa, OK, USA), incorporating Shapiro–Wilk normality tests, ANOVA, and post hoc LSD tests (where applicable). Results: The in vitro comparative experiment demonstrated AR group superior accuracy with mean deviations of 0.42 ± 0.12 mm at the entry point and 0.51 ± 0.18 mm at the apex, compared to 0.48 ± 0.15 mm and 0.58 ± 0.22 mm, respectively, in the 3D-printed guide group (p < 0.05). Angular deviation was significantly lower in the AR group (1.8° ± 0.6°) versus the guide group (2.1° ± 0.7°, p = 0.009). Descriptive statistics revealed the median apex error was 0.49 mm (IQR: 0.38–0.61) for AR versus 0.56 mm (IQR: 0.45–0.72) for guides. Conclusions: AR iPhone navigation technology achieved clinically acceptable accuracy compared to static 3D-printed guides, particularly in controlling angular deviations. While both methods produced clinically acceptable results, AR technology represents a significant advancement for precision-sensitive cases. Full article

Background and Clinical Significance: Advanced periodontitis with severe vertical bone loss and grade III mobility is usually managed by extraction and implant placement. Digital workflows and modern regenerative techniques have opened the possibility of preserving teeth that would traditionally be considered for extraction. This report describes a digitally guided modified intentional replantation (MIR) protocol applied to a maxillary tooth with severe periodontal involvement and unfavourable prognosis. Case Presentation: A 68-year-old male, non-smoker, with a history of heart transplantation under stable medical control, presented with generalized Stage IV, Grade C periodontitis. Tooth 21 showed >75% vertical bone loss, probing depths ≥ 9 mm, bleeding on probing, and grade III mobility. After non-surgical therapy and periodontal stabilization, a CAD/CAM-assisted MIR procedure was planned. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and a 3D-printed tooth replica were used to design a surgical guide for a new recipient socket. The tooth was atraumatically extracted, stored in chilled sterile saline, and managed extraorally for approximately 10 min. Apicoectomy and retrograde sealing with Biodentine^® were performed, followed by immediate replantation into the digitally prepared socket, semi-rigid splinting, and guided tissue regeneration using autologous bone chips, xenograft (Bio-Oss^®), enamel matrix derivative (Emdogain^®), and a collagen membrane (Bio-Gide^®). A conventional orthograde root canal treatment was completed within the first month. At 12 months, tooth 21 exhibited grade 0 mobility, probing depths of 3–4 mm without bleeding on probing, and stable soft tissues. Standardized periapical radiographs and CBCT showed radiographic bone fill within the previous defect and a continuous periodontal ligament-like space, with no signs of ankylosis or root resorption. The tooth was fully functional and asymptomatic. Conclusions: In this medically complex patient, digitally guided MIR allowed preservation of a tooth with severe periodontal involvement and poor prognosis, achieving favourable short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes. While long-term data and larger series are needed, MIR may be considered a tooth-preserving option in carefully selected cases as an alternative to immediate extraction and implant placement. Full article

Background: Hearing loss results from diverse biological insults along the auditory pathway, including sensory hair cell death, neural degeneration, and central auditory processing deficits. Implantable auditory neuroprostheses, such as cochlear and brainstem implants, aim to restore hearing by directly stimulating neural structures. Advances in neurobiology and device technology underpin the development of more sophisticated implants tailored to the biological complexity of auditory dysfunction. Aim: This narrative review of reviews aims to map the integration of artificial intelligence (AI) in auditory neuroprosthetics, analyzing recent research trends, key thematic areas, and the opportunities and challenges of AI-enhanced devices. By synthesizing biological and computational perspectives, it seeks to guide future interdisciplinary efforts toward more adaptive and biologically informed hearing restoration solutions. Methods: This narrative review analyzed recent literature reviews from PubMed and Scopus (last 5 years), focusing on AI integration with auditory neuroprosthetics and related biological processes. Emphasis was placed on studies linking AI innovations to neural plasticity and device–nerve interactions, excluding purely computational works. The ANDJ (a standard narrative review checklist) checklist guided a transparent, rigorous narrative approach suited to this interdisciplinary, rapidly evolving field. Results and discussion: Eighteen recent review articles were analyzed, highlighting significant advancements in the integration of artificial intelligence with auditory neuroprosthetics, particularly cochlear implants. Established areas include predictive modeling, biologically inspired signal processing, and AI-assisted surgical planning, while emerging fields such as multisensory augmentation and remote care remain underexplored. Key limitations involve fragmented biological datasets, lack of standardized biomarkers, and regulatory challenges related to algorithm transparency and clinical application. This review emphasizes the urgent need for AI frameworks that deeply integrate biological and clinical insights, expanding focus beyond cochlear implants to other neuroprosthetic devices. To complement this overview, a targeted analysis of recent cutting-edge studies was also conducted, starting from the emerging gaps to capture the latest technological and biological innovations shaping the field. These findings guide future research toward more biologically meaningful, ethical, and clinically impactful solutions. Conclusions: This narrative review highlights progress in integrating AI with auditory neuroprosthetics, emphasizing the importance of biological foundations and interdisciplinary approaches. It also recognizes ongoing challenges such as data limitations and the need for clear ethical frameworks. Collaboration across fields is vital to foster innovation and improve patient care. Full article

Computer-assisted implant surgery (CAIS) using 3D-printed surgical templates has become a preferred approach for improving implant placement accuracy. Despite its clinical advantages over conventional freehand techniques, CAIS remains limited by the presence of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) metal artefacts, which compromise the 3D data alignment during implant planning and guide fabrication. This narrative review aims to explore the impact of metal artefacts on the accuracy of 3D-printed surgical implant templates and to evaluate current approaches and modifications in implant planning workflows. This article reviews accuracy studies, case reports and technology research on CAIS from the past 5 years. It summarised the CAIS clinical decision framework and data alignment methods to provide alternatives for guided implant therapy in the future. Studies indicate that metal artefacts can distort anatomical data, leading to potential misalignment in 3D data superimposition during surgical guide designs and fabrication. However, various strategies have shown promise in reducing these distortions. Accurate implant planning and template fabrication are essential to ensure clinical success. Special consideration should be given to artefact management during data acquisition. Modified workflows that account for the presence of metal artefacts can enhance guide precision and improve patient outcomes. Full article

Background: Nasal reconstruction requires a balance between aesthetic and functional restoration. Recent advances in three-dimensional (3D) printing have introduced new approaches to this field, enabling precise, patient-specific interventions. This review explores the applications, benefits, and challenges of integrating 3D printing in nasal reconstruction. Methods: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science to identify studies on 3D printing in nasal reconstruction. Peer-reviewed articles and clinical trials were analyzed to assess the impact of 3D-printed models, implants, and bioengineered scaffolds. Results: 3D printing facilitates the creation of anatomical models, surgical guides, and implants, enhancing surgical precision and patient outcomes. Techniques such as stereolithography (SLA) and selective laser sintering (SLS) enable high-resolution, biocompatible constructs using materials like polylactic acid, titanium, and hydroxyapatite. Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) tools improve surgical planning by optimizing nasal airflow. Studies show that 3D-printed guides reduce operative time and improve symmetry. Emerging bioprinting techniques integrating autologous cells offer promise for tissue regeneration. Challenges and Future Directions: Challenges include high costs, imaging limitations, regulatory hurdles, and limited vascularization in bioprinted constructs. Future research should focus on integrating bioactive materials, artificial intelligence-assisted design, and regulatory standardization. Conclusions: 3D printing offers specific advantages in nasal reconstruction, improving precision and outcomes in selected cases. Addressing current limitations through technological and regulatory advancements will further its clinical integration, potentially enhancing reconstructive surgery techniques. Full article

Background and Objectives: Static Computer-Assisted Implant Surgery (sCAIS) can be performed with different drill guiding systems. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of two guiding concepts of sCAIS in partially edentulous cases. Materials and Methods: Forty polyamide models of partially edentulous maxillae with seven implantation sites were fabricated. In total, 140 replica implants were placed with keyless (KL) and drill-key (DK) guiding systems using static, full-arch, tooth-supported surgical guides. Three-dimensional crestal and apical, angular and vertical deviations from the planned implant positions were compared using Mann–Whitney U and Kruskal–Wallis H tests. Intergroup homogeneity of variance homogeneity was examined using Levene’s test to assess the precision. Results: Overall median 3D crestal and apical deviations of implants placed in the KL group were significantly higher compared to the DK group (0.86 mm [0.63–0.98] vs. 0.72 mm [0.52–0.89], p = 0.006 and 1.26 [0.98–1.52] vs. 1.13 [0.70–1.45], p = 0.012). In the subgroup analysis, implants placed with a KL system showed higher 3D crestal (p = 0.029), 3D apical (p < 0.001) and angular (p < 0.001) deviations in the extended anterior area, higher 3D crestal (p < 0.001) deviations in the proximal posterior single-tooth gap and higher vertical (p < 0.001) deviations in the distal site of free-end situation. Contrarily, the KL group showed lower 3D crestal (p = 0.007), 3D apical (p < 0.001), angular (p < 0.001) and vertical (p = 0.003) deviations in the distal posterior single-tooth gap, lower 3D apical (p = 0.007) and angular (p = 0.007) deviations in the distal site of free-end situation and lower vertical (p = 0.019) deviations in the proximal site of free-end situation. Conclusions: The deviations of both guiding concepts did not exceed the recommended safety margins. Statistically significant differences in deviations were found between two guiding concepts. Guiding concepts with superior accuracy varied across different sites of implantation. Full article

Objectives: The study’s objective was to evaluate the accuracy of dynamic computer-assisted surgical implant placement systems during practical training on fresh defrozen cephali. Methods: Three defrozen cephali with terminal dentition received a total of 26 implants (15 4.3 × 13 mm and 11 4.3 × 13 mm, Nobel Biocare Service AG (Zrich-Flughafen Switzerland)) following a standardized protocol: a digital scanning and planning protocol followed by dynamic navigation surgery (X-Guide, X-Nav Technologies, LLC, Lansdale, PA, USA). All surgical interventions were performed by two surgeons: a senior oral surgeon (OE) with more than 5 years of implant dentistry experience and a non-experienced surgeon (NE). Results: Different linear and angular measurements (i.e., deviation shoulder point; deviation tip point; depth deviation shoulder point; depth deviation tip point; B/L and M/D angular deviations) were calculated in duplicate to estimate the discrepancy of the virtual digital planning with respect to the real clinical scenario. The differences between the two operators were also explored. The results of the bivariate analysis detected clinical negligible differences between the operators, without any statistically significant differences for all investigated parameters (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The preliminary positive findings of this pilot study suggest that the investigated dynamic navigation system could be a viable and safe technique for implant surgery and may offer additional safety benefits to non-experienced operators, despite the required learning. Full article

Background/Objectives: We sought to improve accuracy while minimizing radiation hazards, improving surgical outcomes, and preventing potential complications. Despite the increasing popularity of these systems, a limited number of papers have been published addressing the historical evolution, detailing the areas of use, and discussing the advantages and disadvantages, of this increasingly popular system in lumbar spine surgery. Our objective was to offer readers a concise overview of navigation system history in lumbar spine surgeries, the techniques involved, the advantages and disadvantages, and suggestions for future enhancements to the system. Methods: A comprehensive review of the literature was conducted, focusing on the development and implementation of navigation systems in lumbar spine surgeries. Our sources include PubMed-indexed peer-reviewed journals, clinical trial data, and case studies involving technologies such as computer-assisted surgery (CAS), image-guided surgery (IGS), and robotic-assisted systems. Results: To develop more practical, effective, and accurate navigation techniques for spine surgery, consistent advancements have been made over the past four decades. This technological progress began in the late 20th century and has since encompassed image-guided surgery, intraoperative imaging, advanced navigation combined with robotic assistance, and artificial intelligence. These technological advancements have significantly improved the accuracy of implant placement, reducing the risk of misplacement and related complications. Navigation has also been found to be particularly useful in tumor resection and minimally invasive surgery (MIS), where conventional anatomic landmarks are lacking or, in the case of MIS, not visible. Additionally, these innovations have led to shorter operative times, decreased radiation exposure for patients and surgical teams, and lower rates of reoperation. As navigation technology continues to evolve, future innovations are anticipated to further enhance the capabilities and accessibility of these systems, ultimately leading to improved patient outcomes in lumbar spine surgery. Conclusions: The initial limited utilization of navigation system in spine surgery has further expanded to encompass almost all fields of lumbar spine surgeries. As the cost-effectiveness and number of trained surgeons improve, a wider use of the system will be ensured so that the navigation system will be an indispensable tool in lumbar spine surgery. However, continued research and development, along with training programs for surgeons, are essential to fully realize the potential of these technologies in clinical practice. Full article

Background: This systematic review summarizes recent literature on the use of extended reality, including augmented reality (AR), mixed reality (MR), and virtual reality (VR), in preoperative planning for orbital fractures. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane on 6 April 2023. The included studies compared extended reality with conventional planning techniques, focusing on computer-aided surgical simulation based on Computed Tomography data, patient-specific implants (PSIs), fracture reconstruction of the orbital complex, and the use of extended reality. Outcomes analyzed were technical accuracy, planning time, operative time, complications, total cost, and educational benefits. Results: A total of 6381 articles were identified. Four articles discussed the educational use of VR, while one clinical prospective study examined AR for assisting orbital fracture management. Conclusion: AR was demonstrated to ameliorate the accuracy and precision of the incision and enable the better identification of deep anatomical tissues in real time. Consequently, intraoperative imaging enhancement helps to guide the orientation of the orbital reconstruction plate and better visualize the precise positioning and fixation of the PSI of the fractured orbital walls. However, the technical accuracy of 2–3 mm should be considered. VR-based educational tools provided better visualization and understanding of craniofacial trauma compared to conventional 2- or 3-dimensional images. Full article

The aim of this study was to investigate how precisely implantation can be realized by participants on a phantom head according to preliminary planning. Of particular interest here was the influence of participants’ previous knowledge and surgical experience on the precision of the implant placement. The placed implants were scanned using an intraoral scanner, saved as STL files, and superimposed with the 3D-planned implant placement. Deviations from the planning were indicated in millimeters and degrees. We were able to show that on average, the deviations from computer-assisted 3D planning were less than 1 mm for implantologists, and the students also did not deviate more than 1.78 mm on average from 3D planning. This study shows that guided implantology provides predictable and reproducible results in dental implantology. Incorrect positioning, injuries to anatomical structures, and implant positions that cannot be prosthetically restored can thus be avoided. Full article

Objective: complex rehabilitations present multiple difficulties, regarding both the planification of the surgery and the design of the prothesis. A digital approach can support the workflow, as well as the degree of intraoperative precision, and improve the long-term prognosis. Methods: A surgical guide was designed for implant placement. An extensive regeneration of the upper jaw was performed with contextual implant insertion, and a delayed load rehabilitation was chosen. After four months, a second surgery and a simultaneous soft tissue augmentation was performed, and a 3D-printed temporary restoration was placed. After another two months, new dental and facial scans, smile design, and facial bite registrations were obtained. Upper and lower dentures were built using an exclusively digital workflow. Both metal substructures were passivated and cemented in one session; in the following appointment, the aesthetic and occlusal checks were carried out. During the third visit, both prostheses were delivered. Results: Careful case planning and the surgical guide made it possible to achieve primary stability and acceptable emergence profiles in an extremely reabsorbed upper jaw. Leukocyte-Platelet Rich Fibrin (L-PRF) made the extensive bone regeneration more approachable and lowered the post-operative pain and swelling, while speeding up the soft tissue healing process. During the re-entry surgery, the volumes of soft tissues were increased to improve aesthetics, and the amount of keratinized gingiva around the six implants was also increased. Smile design and facial scans have provided the means to create acceptable aesthetics and function in a few sessions with minimal patient discomfort. Conclusions: Computer-assisted implantology is a safe and precise method of performing dental implant surgery. Preliminary studies have a high degree of accuracy, but further studies are needed to arrive at a fully digital clinical protocol at all stages. Full article

Traditional dental implant surgery has been challenged by the phenomenal progression in computer-assisted surgery (CAS) that we have been witnessing in recent years. Among the computer-aided technologies, computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) techniques represent by far the most attractive and accepted alternatives over their dynamic counterpart, navigational assistance. Based on many years of experience, we have determined that CAD/CAM technology for guiding dental implant surgery is valuable for rehabilitation of the anterior maxillary region and the management of complete or severe partial edentulism. The technology also guarantees the 3D parallelism of implants. The purpose of the present report is to describe indications for use of CAD/CAM dental implant guided surgery. We analyzed the clinical and radiological data of thirteen consecutive edentulous patients treated using CAD/CAM techniques. All of the patients had stable cosmetic results with a high rate of patient satisfaction at the final follow-up examination. No intra- and/or postoperative complications were encountered during any of the steps of the procedure. The application of CAD/CAM techniques produced successful outcomes in the patients presented in this series. Full article

Robotic systems have emerged in dental implant surgery due to their accuracy. Autonomous robotic surgery may offer unprecedented advantages over conventional alternatives. This clinical protocol was used to show the feasibility of autonomous robotic surgery for immediately loaded implant-supported full-arch prostheses in the maxilla. This case report demonstrated the surgical protocol and outcomes in detail, highlighting the pros and cons of the autonomous robotic system. Within the limitations of this study, autonomous robotic surgery could be a feasible alternative to computer-assisted guided implant surgery. Full article