Search Results (27)

(1) Background: TNF inhibitors (TNFis) have revolutionized the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). However, 30–40% of RA patients do not respond adequately to those biologics. In addition to neutralizing soluble TNF, TNFis have the ability to bind the transmembrane form of TNF, tmTNF. Importantly, tmTNF can act itself as a receptor that induces “Reverse Signaling” (RS) in cells. We previously showed that certolizumab, a Fab’ TNFi, activates RS in human primary monocytes, at least in part through the transcription factor Nrf2 that is known to regulate the expression of genes involved in anti-inflammatory response and oxidative stress. (2) Methods: Here, we have developed an assay for the prediction of clinical response of RA patients to TNF inhibitors. This assay is based on mRNA quantitation of CD36 activation and of six genes induced by Nrf2 following tmTNF RS in fresh monocytes. (3) Results: We could predict the response to anti-TNF monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) with 93.3% accuracy. However, our method was not suitable for the prediction of the response to TNF soluble receptor etanercept. (4) Conclusions: We have developed a rather simple, short-term test that can be standardized. Predicting the response to TNF mAbs will help physicians offer the best available treatment and provide patients with personalized medicine. Full article

Psoriasis is an immune-related disorder that is marked by abnormal thickening of the skin, the rapid multiplication of keratinocytes, and complex interactions between immune cells and the affected areas. Although psoriasis cannot currently be cured, drugs can alleviate symptoms by regulating immune homeostasis and preventing comorbidities. There are many types of drugs to treat psoriasis: small-molecule drugs, including corticosteroids; retinoids; vitamin D analogs; and immunosuppressants, such as glucocorticoid ointment, tretinoin cream, methotrexate tablets, etc. Macromolecular biological drugs, such as Certolizumab, Secukinumab, Guselkumab, etc., include monoclonal antibodies that target various inflammatory signaling pathways. Compared with traditional small-molecule drugs, biological therapies offer better targeting and lower systemic side effects, but their high costs and invasive administration modes constrict their widespread use. Spesolimab is the latest biological agent used to target the interleukin-36 receptor (IL-36R) to be approved for market use, which significantly reduces the risk of general pustular psoriasis (GPP) flare by 84%. Additionally, there are several biological agents used to target the interleukin-23/T helper 17 cell pathway that have already entered Phase II and III clinical trials. At present, the first-line therapeutic strategy for mild psoriasis is topical administration. Systemic therapy and phototherapy are preferred for treating moderate to severe types. However, the current therapeutic drugs for psoriasis cannot completely meet the clinical needs. More advanced drug delivery systems with optimized target effects and better bioavailability are required. Nanocarriers are emerging for the delivery of proteins, nucleic acids, and cell-based therapies. In this review, we analyze the current status of psoriasis therapeutics and discuss novel delivery systems for diverse psoriasis drugs, as well as emerging cell-based therapies. We also summarize the therapeutic effectiveness of different delivery strategies. Full article

Objectives: There are many explanations for increased levels of serum uric acid (SUA) in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), but correlation with different treatment options in PsA is not well elucidated. Our aim was to determine the effects of biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) on SUA levels in patients with PsA. Materials and methods: We analyzed the data of PsA patients treated with different bDMARDs from January 2007 to June 2021. Patients treated with interleukin-17 (IL-17) inhibitors (secukinumab and ixekizumab) and tumor necrosis factor α (TNFα) inhibitors (golimumab, infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab pegol, and etanercept) were included. Results: A total of 87 patients were included. The SUA levels decreased in 60 (69%) patients after a 3–6-month-long follow-up, and in 25 (28.7%), we noticed an increase. The average decrease in SUA levels was 9.4 ± 49.5 µmol/L (p = 0.039); for TNFα patients, it was 7.3 ± 59.8 µmol/L (p = 0.386), and for IL-17 patients, it was 12.6 ± 28.4 µmol/L (p = 0.013). The levels of SUA decreased in 81.8% of patients treated with infliximab, as well as in 76% of those treated with secukinumab and in 72.7% of those treated with etanercept. The largest average decrease in SUA levels was recorded in the group treated with golimumab (23 µmol/L). Conclusions: A significant decrease in SUA levels was noticed, especially in patients treated with IL-17 inhibitors. Further studies should identify which bDMARD is the most potent in the lowering of SUA levels. bDMARDs were efficient in PsA disease activity. Full article

Background: The leading cause of blindness due to non-infectious uveitis is cystoid macular edema (CME). Behçet’s disease (BD) is one of the most commonly conditions related to CME. Objectives: To compare the effectiveness and safety of adalimumab (ADA), infliximab (IFX) and certolizumab (CZP) in refractory CME due to BD. Methods: Multicenter study of BD-CME patients with no response to glucocorticoids (GCs) and at least one conventional immunosuppressive drug. At baseline, all patients presented CME, defined by OCT > 300 µ. The effectiveness of ADA, IFX and CZP was assessed over a 2-year period from baseline using the following ocular parameters: macular thickness (µm), visual acuity (BCVA), anterior chamber (AC) cells and vitritis. Mixed-effects regression models were applied. Results: a total of 50 patients (75 eyes) were studied (ADA = 25; IFX = 15 and CZP = 10). No significant differences in demographic parameters were found among the three groups. However, individuals in the CZP group had a significantly extended time from diagnosis to treatment onset (72 (36–120) months, p = 0.03) and had received a higher number of biological therapies (1.7 ± 1.1) compared to the ADA and IFX groups. Within the CZP group, ADA and IFX were previously administrated in seven patients. After 2 years of follow-up, a rapid and sustained reduction in macular thickness was noted in all three groups with no significant differences between them. Additionally, enhancements in BCVA, AC cells and vitritis were also observed. No serious adverse events were reported in the CZP group, although one isolated case of bacteremia was documented in the ADA group. ADA, IFX and CZP appear to be effective and safe treatments for refractory CME in BD. CZP seems to remain effective even in patients with an insufficient response to ADA and/or IFX. Conclusions: ADA, IFX and CZP appear to be effective and safe treatments for refractory CME in BD. CZP seems to remain effective even in patients with an insufficient response to ADA and/or IFX. Full article

Treatment for pregnant women with psoriasis is limited by the lack of information typically related to clinical trials. While anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) drugs offer therapeutic benefits, their safety during pregnancy is a concern. Notably, certolizumab is comparatively safer than adalimumab, etanercept, infliximab, and golimumab according to the current recommendations. Thus, this study aimed to conduct a pharmacovigilance comparative analysis of maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with certolizumab versus other anti-TNF drugs by using data from EudraVigilance. A descriptive analysis was performed of Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) associated with an anti-TNF drug and related to the pregnant patients with psoriasis from 2009 and 2023, focusing our analysis on the specific pregnancy outcomes and fetal/neonatal disorders. The most common pregnancy-related adverse event was spontaneous abortion, predominantly related to adalimumab and certolizumab. Certolizumab was also reported in cases of caesarean section, gestational diabetes, abortion, fetal death, fetal distress syndrome, pre-eclampsia, and premature separation of placenta. Generally, the findings from our study depicted a safety profile that overlapped for each anti-TNF drug, both in maternal/neonatal outcomes and other adverse events, suggesting no substantial differences between treatments. We advocate for further investigations before making concrete recommendations. Full article

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a group of heterogeneous chronic inflammatory diseases of the gut presenting with intestinal and extraintestinal manifestations. Most cases fit in predominantly two types, namely, ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. The incidence of IBD has been increasing steadily in the past three decades. Focused research has resulted in many therapeutic options. Biologics (derived from humans or animals) and small molecules have emerged as the cornerstone in the management of IBD and have become widely available. Currently, monoclonal antibodies against tumor necrosis factor-alpha (infliximab, adalimumab, certolizumab, and golimumab), integrins (vedolizumab and natalizumab), and interleukin (IL)-12 and IL-23 antagonists (ustekinumab), along with small molecules (tofacitinib), are approved for use. This article summarizes various aspects of these drugs, like clinical pharmacology, indications for use in IBD, safety in pregnancy and lactation, and the adverse effects profile based on the studies leading to their approval. This review also focuses on the recent advances and future perspectives specific to biologics in IBD. Full article

Disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) is a class of anti-rheumatic medicines that are frequently prescribed to patients suffering from rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methotrexate, sulfasalazine, hydroxychloroquine, and azathioprine are examples of non-biologic DMARDs that are being used for alleviating pain and preventing disease progression. Biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) like infliximab, rituximab, etanercept, adalimumab, tocilizumab, certolizumab pegol, and abatacept have greater effectiveness with fewer adverse effects in comparison to non-biologic DMARDs. This review article delineates the classification of DMARDs and their characteristic attributes. The poor aqueous solubility or permeability causes the limited oral bioavailability of synthetic DMARDs, while the high molecular weights along with the bulky structures of bDMARDs have posed few obstacles in their drug delivery and need to be addressed through the development of nanoformulations like cubosomes, nanospheres, nanoemulsions, solid lipid nanoparticles, nanomicelles, liposome, niosomes, and nanostructured lipid carrier. The main focus of this review article is to highlight the potential role of nanotechnology in the drug delivery of DMARDs for increasing solubility, dissolution, and bioavailability for the improved management of RA. This article also focusses on the different aspects of nanoparticles like their applications in biologics, biocompatibility, body clearance, scalability, drug loading, and stability issues. Full article

Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by thrombotic or obstetric events occurring in individuals who have persistent antiphospholipid antibodies. Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) is a rare and potentially fatal form of APS characterized by severe thrombotic complications occurring in multiple organs over a short period of time or simultaneously. CAPS is associated with a high (50%) death rate. Infections, multi-organ failure, and cerebral and heart thrombosis represent the main complications of this syndrome. Generally, anticoagulants, glucocorticoids, therapeutic plasmapheresis (TPE), and intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) are used in combination for treatment. Multidisciplinary care involving different specialists from hematology, rheumatology, nephrology, infectious disease, critical care, and obstetrics is often required due to the complexity of the disease. Recent data emphasize the effectiveness of biologics such as anti-TNF-a monoclonal antibodies (adalimumab, certolizumab), anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (daratumumab), BAFF/Blys inhibitor (belimumab), and BTK inhibitor (zanubrutinib) against CAPS. In order to understand the underlying causes of CAPS, one future possibility involves investigating and characterizing the hereditary and acquired risk factors associated with CAPS. Full article

Introduction: Inflammatory bowel disease is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the gastrointestinal tract. Biologic drugs target specific molecules in the body’s immune system to control inflammation. Recent studies have suggested a potential link between their use and an increased risk of nephrolithiasis. We conducted a study to further investigate this association. Methods: The study used multiple logistic regression analysis to assess the association between the use of biologic drugs and nephrolithiasis. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant. SAS 9.4 was used for statistical analysis. Results: The final sample consisted of 22,895 cases, among which 5603 (24.51%) were receiving at least one biologic drug. The biologic drugs received were as follows: Adalimumab 2437 (10.66%), Infliximab 1996 (8.73%), Vedolizumab 1397 (6.11%), Ustekinumab 1304 (5.70%); Tofacitinib, 308 (1.35%); Certolizumab, 248 (1.08%); and Golimumab, 121 (0.53%). There were 1780 (7.74%) patients with Nephrolithiasis: 438 (8.0%) patients were receiving biologic treatment. We found that the use of Vedolizumab (OR = 1.307, 95% CI 1.076–1.588, p = 0.0071) increased the odds of Nephrolithiasis by 31%. Conclusion: Vedolizumab use was associated with an increased risk of nephrolithiasis. The use of two or more biologic drugs also increased the risk compared to no biologic treatment. Full article

Background: Psoriasis is an immune-mediated chronic skin disease that is associated with a significant psychological burden. A newer line of therapy is represented by biologic agents. Our study aimed to evaluate the effect of biologic therapies in the treatment of psoriasis concerning both disease severity and psychological comorbidity. Material and Methods: We performed a prospective case-control comparison to evaluate the prevalence of depression and anxiety in psoriasis patients and unaffected individuals. All patients were recruited between October 2017 and February 2021. Baseline depression (PHQ-9), anxiety (GAD-7), PASI, and DLQI scores were noted. Then, we evaluated the efficacy of biologic treatment in reducing these scores at 6 months of therapy. Patients were treated with either ixekizumab, secukinumab, guselkumab, certolizumab, ustekinumab, risankizumab, or adalimumab. Results: 106 bio-naïve patients with psoriasis and 106 controls without the disease were included in this study. Depression and anxiety were significantly more common among psoriasis patients than in unaffected individuals (p < 0.0001). Female patients presented both depression and anxiety more frequently than men in both case and control groups. Disease severity was significantly associated with worsened depression and anxiety symptoms. Biologic therapy resulted in a significant decrease in all four scores at the 6-month mark for each patient (p < 0.0001). Only an improved PASI correlated significantly with lower depression and anxiety scores (p < 0.005), whereas a decreased DLQI did not (p > 0.955). None of the seven biologic agents used was discovered to be superior. Conclusion: biologic therapies are effective in decreasing both disease severity and alleviating depression and anxiety symptoms in psoriasis. Full article

Anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α agents have been increasingly used to treat patients affected by inflammatory bowel disease and dermatological and rheumatologic inflammatory disorders. However, the widening use of biologics is related to a new class of adverse events called paradoxical reactions. Its pathogenesis remains unclear, but it is suggested that cytokine remodulation in predisposed individuals can lead to the inflammatory process. Here, we dissect the clinical aspects and overall outcomes of autoimmune diseases caused by anti-TNF-α therapies. Full article

Due to the key role of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) in the pathogenesis of immunoinflammatory diseases, TNF-α inhibitors have been successfully developed and used in the clinical treatment of autoimmune disorders. Currently, five anti-TNF-α drugs have been approved: infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, certolizumab pegol and etanercept. Anti-TNF-α biosimilars are also available for clinical use. Here, we will review the historical development as well as the present and potential future applications of anti-TNF-α therapies, which have led to major improvements for patients with several autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), ankylosing spondylitis (AS), Crohn’s disease (CD), ulcerative colitis (UC), psoriasis (PS) and chronic endogenous uveitis. Other therapeutic areas are under evaluation, including viral infections, e.g., COVID-19, as well as chronic neuropsychiatric disorders and certain forms of cancer. The search for biomarkers able to predict responsiveness to anti-TNF-α drugs is also discussed. Full article

We performed a retrospective and observational study of patients with psoriasis. The aim of this study was to define the laboratory indicators reflecting the treatment response to tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors and the predictors for the treatment response. From January 2010 to June 2022, 28, 15 and 12 patients with psoriasis were treated with infliximab (IFX), adalimumab (ADA) and certolizumab pegol (CZP), respectively. The values of C-reactive protein (CRP), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio and monocyte to lymphocyte ratio decreased in parallel with psoriasis area and severity index (PASI) at weeks 12 and 52 of treatment. The percentage reduction of the CRP was correlated with that of the PASI at week 52 in all patients and subgroups treated with IFX. The percentage reduction of the PLR was correlated with that of the PASI at week 52 in all patients. Linear multivariate regression analyses revealed that the presence of scalp lesions was associated with a high percentage reduction of the PASI at week 52 in the ADA subgroup. The CRP and PLR might act as biomarkers reflecting the treatment response to TNF-α inhibitors in patients with psoriasis. The presence of scalp lesions might be a predictive factor for a high treatment response to ADA in patients with psoriasis. Full article

Objective: Update the available evidence comparing biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) in combination with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (CsDMARDs) to bDMARDs in monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Methods: Research was limited to randomized controlled trials. Major outcome: ACR 20 response criteria at 24 weeks. Secondary outcomes: clinical and radiographic criteria at week 24, 52 and 104. Results: 23 trials (6358 patients), including seven bDMARDs and one other molecule: Anbainuo (anti-TNF-R). No study satisfied our search criteria for anakinra, certolizumab and infliximab. Compared to bDMARD monotherapy, combination therapy gives a better ACR 20 at 24 weeks (RR: 0.88 (0.84–0.94)) in fixed and random effect models, and this result is sustained at 52 and 104 weeks. The results were mostly similar for all other outcomes without increasing the risk of adverse effects. Conclusion: This meta-analysis confirms the superiority of combination therapy over monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis, in accordance to the usual guidelines. Full article