Search Results (78)

Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) and Automated Driving Systems (ADS) are becoming convenient modes of transportation; however, their safety remains a critical concern as crashes continue to occur. To reveal crash trends and temporal variations, this study develops time-series forecasting models to predict future crash counts of such vehicles. The crash dataset released by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has been used here. Two univariate forecasting models—the Seasonal Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average (SARIMA) and the Facebook Prophet model—have been used here for different datasets. The models were trained on 30 months of data (July 2021 to December 2023) and validated on 6 months of data (January–June 2024). Validation metrics include Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Mean Absolute Percentage Error (MAPE) and Theil’s U1 statistic. Results showed that Facebook Prophet significantly outperformed SARIMA for both datasets, achieving an RMSE of 2.71 and an MAPE of 6.9% for ADAS, and an RMSE of 2.24 and an MAPE of 8.85% for ADS. For both systems, the model revealed empirically observed cyclical patterns and consistent rising trends. ADAS crashes exhibit a bimodal temporal pattern, with recurring peaks in January and May–June, alongside notable troughs in February–March and August–September. ADS displays a trimodal pattern, with recurring peaks in April–May, August and October, alongside notable troughs in December and the early winter months. These patterns represent empirically identified temporal regularities rather than causally attributed seasonality. From the future forecasts for July to December 2024, the model showed that ADAS crashes are expected to range between 40 and 80 per month, while ADS crashes are projected to remain between 20 and 40 per month. These findings underscore the need for proactive safety measures and enhanced regulatory oversight during identified high-risk periods to mitigate the growing trend in AV crashes. Full article

As large scale digitization continues to reform business processes, one critical challenge organizations are currently facing is managing the staggering amount of data flowing. Further, with large datasets comes the added complexity of insuring a cyber secure environment and shielding the information security management system (ISMS) from undesirable manipulations. Today’s drastic rise of cyberattacks urges the need for effective security frameworks to guard against unauthorized access and malicious acts impeding business operations. The latter of which compelled organizations to adopt holistic information security approaches, commonly implemented via ISMS frameworks. Further, to maintain an effective ISMS, ongoing monitoring and measurements are highly required. Considering the aforementioned points, this paper explores how organizations measure the effectiveness of their ISMS focusing on key performance indicators, metrics, and foundational components involved in information security management by categorizing metrics into governance, risk, and incident response as well as determining the maturity level based on ISO alignment, the presence, specificity and automation of KPIs. Based on empirical interviews with eight diverse organizations, the research findings reveal a wide range of maturity among organizations, from those lacking clear defined KPIs to those with sophisticated multi-layered systems. While special attention is paid to incident-response management, companies with a strong ISMS stand out because they use automated and proactive metrics for strategic reporting, whereas companies with a weaker ISMS often do not have organized KPIs and depend on random manual audits. Based on these results, the present work suggests an analysis framework for evaluating ISMS effectiveness. While previous studies have struggled to define clear ISMS measurement practices, this paper aims to provide insights on measurements by identifying the core building blocks of ISMS and revealing how they are evaluated to drive continual ISMS improvement. Full article

Ensuring the safety of Autonomous Driving Systems (ADS) at urban intersections remains challenging due to complex interactions between vehicles and traffic management infrastructure. This study validates an ADS equipped with connected perception using Infrastructure-to-Vehicle (I2V) communication within a combined virtual and hybrid testing approach. The validation follows the overall structure and methodology of the SUNRISE Safety Assurance Framework (SAF), which is applied in detail where required by the scope of the study. Five representative urban intersection scenarios, covering both nominal driving conditions and safety-critical edge cases, are evaluated using virtual simulations in MATLAB/Simulink (2014b) and hybrid experiments integrating OMNeT++ (5.7.1)/Veins (5.2)/SUMO (1.12.0) with real-world components. Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) related to safety, decision-making, longitudinal control, passenger comfort, and V2X communication performance are analyzed. The results show strong consistency between virtual and hybrid testing, with ego vehicle speed deviations below 2 km/h and trigger distance differences under 3 m. V2X communication achieves a near-perfect Cooperative Awareness Message (CAM) delivery ratio, with an average latency of approximately 142 ms. While this latency remains within the tolerance of the deployed ADS, the overall end-to-end delay highlights opportunities for further optimization. The study demonstrates how the SUNRISE SAF can effectively structure ADS validation, identifies critical scenarios such as right-of-way violations by non-priority obstacles, and provides insights into improving connectivity handling and low-speed braking behavior for Cooperative, Connected, and Automated Mobility (CCAM) systems in urban environments. Full article

The development of AI-driven automated driving functions requires vast amounts of diverse, high-quality data to ensure road safety and reliability. However, both the manual collection of real-world data and creation of 3D environments are costly, time-consuming, and hard to scale. Most automatic environment generation methods still rely heavily on manual effort, and only a few are tailored for Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) and Automated Driving Systems (ADS) training and validation. We propose an automated generative framework that learns ground-truth features to reconstruct 3D environments from a road definition and two simple parameters for country and area type. Environment generation is structured into three modules—map-based data generation, semantic city generation, and final detailing. The overall framework is validated by training a perception network on a mixed set of real and synthetic data, validating it solely on real data, and comparing performance to assess the practical value of the environments we generated. By constructing a Pareto front over combinations of training set sizes and real-to-synthetic data ratios, we show that our synthetic data can replace up to $85\%$ of real data without significant quality degradation. Our results demonstrate how multi-layered environment generation frameworks enable flexible and scalable data generation for perception tasks while incorporating ground-truth 3D environment data. This reduces reliance on costly field data and supports automated rapid scenario exploration for finding safety-critical edge cases. Full article

To ensure the safety of vehicles and occupants under failures or functional limitations of ego vehicles, a minimum risk maneuver (MRM) has been proposed as a key automated driving system (ADS) function. However, executing an MRM may pose certain potential risks when sensor failures occur. This study proposed an MRM strategy designed to enhance highway-driving safety during MRM execution under multiple sensor-failure conditions. A hazard and operability study analysis, based on an ADS behavior model, is conducted to systematically identify hazards, determine potential hazardous events, and categorize the associated safety risks arising from sensor failures. Within the proposed strategy, virtual objects are generated to account for potential hazards and support risk assessments. Adaptive MRM behavior is determined in real time by analyzing surrounding objects and evaluating time-to-collision and time headway. The strategy is verified by using a MATLAB–CARLA co-simulation environment across three representative highway scenarios with combined sensor failures. The result demonstrates that the proposed MRM strategy can mitigate collision risk in hazardous scenarios while effectively leveraging the remaining functional sensors to guide the ego vehicle toward an appropriate minimum risk condition during MRM execution. Full article

As the deployment of Automated Driving Systems (ADS) and Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS-L2) expands, understanding their real-world safety performance becomes essential. This study examines the severity and contributing factors of crashes involving vehicles equipped with ADS and ADAS-L2 technologies using NHTSA data. Using machine learning models on crash datasets from 2021 to 2024, this research identifies patterns and risk factors influencing injury outcomes. After data preprocessing and handling missing values for severity classification, four models were trained: logistic regression, random forest, SVM, and XGBoost. XGBoost outperformed the others for both ADS and ADAS-L2, achieving the highest accuracy and recall. Variable importance analysis showed that for ADS crashes, interactions with other road users and poor lighting were the strongest predictors of injury severity, while for ADAS-L2 crashes, fixed object collisions and low light conditions were most influential. From a policy and engineering perspective, this study highlights the need for standardized crash reporting and improved ADS object detection and pedestrian response. It also emphasizes effective human–machine interface design and driver training for partial automation. Unlike previous research, this study conducts comparative model-based evaluations of both ADS and ADAS-L2 using recent crash reports to inform safety standards and policy frameworks. Full article

This study investigates the causes of traffic accidents involving Advanced Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) and Autonomous Driving Systems (ADS) and their interdependencies. Using a source dataset comprising 3015 ADAS accident records and 1085 ADS accident records from National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the study categorizes accident severity into four levels and applies association rule mining (ARM) to identify high-frequency risk factor combinations. Key risk factors include environmental, road, vehicle, and accident characteristics. Findings show that ADAS accidents are concentrated in highway straight-driving scenarios, strongly correlated with rainy weather, and often involve rear-end collisions due to delayed driver reactions. ADS accidents predominantly occur in intersection stopping scenarios, favor clear weather, and exhibit better safety performance in non-damage cases with Level 5 (L5) systems, though they still face perception and decision-making challenges in complex scenarios like nighttime wet roads. The study further reveals that vehicle design purpose (ADAS for highways, L5 for urban areas) strongly influences accident severity, with L5 systems reducing fatality risks through advanced perception but still affected by high speeds, extreme lighting, and system aging. Make attributes and technological maturity also significantly impact outcomes. This study provides insights for technological advancement, regulatory improvements, and human–machine collaboration optimization. Full article

Automated driving systems (ADSs) have the potential to make mobility services both safer and more accessible. The New Assessment/Test Method (NATM) from the UNECE establishes a multi-pillar framework for ADS safety assessment, centred on comprehensive scenario-based testing of the operational design domain (ODD). While NATM sets out the vision, it leaves unresolved how such assessments can be scaled and applied in practice. The SUNRISE safety assurance framework (SAF) addresses this challenge by offering a concrete and scalable pathway for operationalising NATM principles. The core contribution of this paper is the successful execution of the SAF process. Rather than validating the performance of a specific automated driving function, the work demonstrates how the SAF can be applied end-to-end: starting from external requirements for the system under test (SUT), through scenario generation based on ODD, dynamic driving task (DDT), and test objectives to the allocation of scenarios across heterogeneous test environments and the consolidation of outcomes into a structured safety argument. The approach is exemplified through the use case of automated truck docking in confined logistics environments. Simulation (CARLA), a scaled model truck, and a full-size truck are employed not to validate the ADS function itself, but to show that the SAF enables consistent, traceable, and defensible execution of NATM-aligned safety assessment. This walk-through highlights the scalability, practicality, and applicability of the SAF to real-world ADS features. Full article

Scenario-based testing is a mainstream approach for evaluating the safety of automated driving systems (ADS). However, logical scenarios are defined through parameter spaces, and performance differences among systems under test make it difficult to ensure fairness and coverage using the same concrete parameters. Accordingly, an automated driving system testing method is proposed. Guided by the established full-coverage testing framework, a quantitative evaluation method for scenario representativeness is first proposed by jointly analyzing naturalistic driving probability distributions and hazard-related characteristics. Furthermore, a hybrid algorithm integrating heat-guided hierarchical search and genetic optimization is developed to address the non-uniform full-coverage problem, enabling efficient selection of representative parameters that ensure complete coverage of the logical scenario space. The proposed method is validated through empirical studies in representative use cases, including lead vehicle braking and cut-in scenarios. Experimental results show that the proposed method achieves 100% coverage of the logical scenario parameter space with an 8% boundary fitting error, outperforming mainstream baselines including monte carlo (84.3%, 19%), combinatorial testing (86.5%, 14%) and importance sampling (72.0%, 7%). The approach achieves exhaustive coverage of the logical scenario space with limited concrete scenarios, and effectively supports the development of consistent, reproducible and efficient scenario generation frameworks for testing organizations. Full article

Ensuring the safety of Automated Driving Systems (ADSs) requires structured and transparent validation processes. Scenario-based testing has emerged as a widely adopted approach, enabling the targeted assessment of system behavior under diverse and challenging conditions. To offer a structured approach for scenario-based safety assurance, the European SUNRISE project developed the Safety Assurance Framework (SAF), which comprises stages such as scenario creation, allocation, execution, evaluation, decision-making, and in-service monitoring and reporting. Central to the SAF are scenario metrics, which quantify aspects such as coverage, criticality, and complexity and support evidence for safety cases. This paper provides a comprehensive overview of scenario-based scenario metrics relevant to ADS safety assessments. We categorize six core metric types: completeness, coverage, criticality, diversity/dissimilarity, exposure, and complexity. We explain their roles across the difference SAF components. This paper also discusses interdependencies among metrics, implementation challenges, and gaps where further research is needed, particularly in metric validation, aggregation, and standardization. By clarifying the landscape of scenario metrics and their application within the SAF, this work aims to support both practitioners and researchers in advancing scalable, data-driven safety assurance for ADSs. Full article

With the rapid adoption of automated driving systems, ensuring safe and efficient driver takeover has become a crucial challenge for road safety. This study introduces a novel psychological framework for understanding and predicting takeover behavior in conditionally automated vehicles, leveraging an extended Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) model enriched by real-world driver experience. Drawing on survey data from 385 automated driving system users recruited in Shaoguan City, China, through face-to-face questionnaire administration covering various ADS types (ACC, lane-keeping, automatic parking), we demonstrate that driver attitudes, perceived behavioral control, and subjective norms are significant determinants of takeover intention, collectively explaining nearly half of its variance (R² = 48.7%). Importantly, our analysis uncovers that both intention and perceived behavioral control have robust, direct effects on actual takeover behavior. Crucially, this work is among the first to reveal that individual user characteristics—such as driving experience and ADS (automated driving system) usage frequency—substantially moderate these psychological pathways: experienced or frequent users rely more on perceived control and attitude, while less experienced drivers are more susceptible to social influences. By advancing a multi-dimensional psychological model that integrates personal, social, and experiential moderators, our findings deliver actionable insights for the design of adaptive human–machine interfaces, tailored driver training, and targeted safety interventions in the context of automated driving. Using structural equation modeling with maximum likelihood estimation (χ²/df = 2.25, CFI = 0.941, RMSEA = 0.057), this psychological approach complements traditional engineering models by revealing that takeover behavior variance is explained at 58.3%. Full article

The automotive industry is advancing toward fully automated driving, where perception systems rely on complementary sensors such as LiDAR and cameras to interpret the vehicle’s surroundings. For Level 4 and higher vehicles, redundancy is vital to prevent safety-critical failures. One way to achieve this is by using data from one sensor type to support another. While much research has focused on reconstructing LiDAR point cloud data using camera images, limited work has been conducted on the reverse process—reconstructing image data from LiDAR. This paper proposes a deep learning model, named LiDAR Generative Camera (LiGenCam), to fill this gap. The model reconstructs camera images by utilizing multimodal LiDAR data, including reflectance, ambient light, and range information. LiGenCam is developed based on the Generative Adversarial Network framework, incorporating pixel-wise loss and semantic segmentation loss to guide reconstruction, ensuring both pixel-level similarity and semantic coherence. Experiments on the DurLAR dataset demonstrate that multimodal LiDAR data enhances the realism and semantic consistency of reconstructed images, and adding segmentation loss further improves semantic consistency. Ablation studies confirm these findings. Full article

Accurate traffic light status detection and the appropriate response to changes in that status are crucial for autonomous driving systems (ADSs) starting from SAE Level 3 automation. The dilemma zone problem occurs during the amber phase of traffic lights, when the ADS must decide whether to stop or proceed through the intersection. This paper proposes a methodology for developing a runtime monitor that addresses the dilemma zone problem and monitors the autonomous vehicle’s behavior at traffic lights, ensuring that the ADS’s decisions align with the system’s safety requirements. This methodology yields a set of safety requirements formulated in controlled natural language, their formal specification in linear temporal logic (LTL), and the implementation of a corresponding runtime monitor. The monitor is integrated within a safety-oriented software architecture through a modular autonomous driving system pipeline, enabling real-time supervision of the ADS’s decision-making at intersections. The results show that the monitor maintained stable and fast reaction times between 40 ms and 65 ms across varying speeds (up to 13 m/s), remaining well below the 100 ms threshold required for safe autonomous operation. At speeds of 30, 50, and 70 km/h, the system ensured correct behavior with no violations of traffic light regulations. Furthermore, the monitor achieved 100% detection accuracy of the relevant traffic lights within 76 m, with high spatial precision (±0.4 m deviation). While the system performed reliably under typical conditions, it showed limitations in disambiguating adjacent, irrelevant signals at distances below 25 m, indicating opportunities for improvement in dense urban environments. Full article

Open-source autonomous driving systems (ADS) have become a cornerstone of autonomous vehicle development. By providing access to cutting-edge technology, fostering global collaboration, and accelerating innovation, these platforms are transforming the automated vehicle landscape. This survey conducts a comprehensive analysis of leading open-source ADS platforms, evaluating their functionalities, strengths, and limitations. Through an extensive literature review, the survey explores their adoption and utilization across key research domains. Additionally, it identifies emerging trends shaping the field. The main contributions of this survey include (1) a detailed overview of leading open-source platforms, highlighting their strengths and weaknesses; (2) an examination of their impact on research; and (3) a synthesis of current trends, particularly in interoperability with emerging technologies such as AI/ML solutions and edge computing. This study aims to provide researchers and practitioners with a holistic understanding of open-source ADS platforms, guiding them in selecting the right platforms for future innovation. Full article

Nondestructive testing (NDT) has a crucial role in ensuring the reliability and safety of industrial systems. However, traditional methods typically rely on external sensors, which can lead to increased costs and added complexity. The current study examined an alternative approach using variable-frequency drive (VFD) data for real-time fault detection and predictive maintenance. Most VFDs continuously monitor essential parameters such as motor speed, torque, efficiency, and power consumption, facilitating sensorless condition monitoring that helps detect early-stage motor and apparatus faults without additional hardware. To improve diagnostic capabilities, calculated metrics such as apparent power, efficiency, torque, and energy consumption can deliver more profound insights into system performance, assisting in identifying potential failure patterns. A Python-based data acquisition and visualization system was developed and implemented as an example of a potential solution, enabling centralized monitoring, anomaly detection, and historical data analysis. Future advancements in artificial intelligence and machine learning could further refine automated fault detection by utilizing historical VFD data to predict system failures accurately. By integrating VFD-based diagnostics into NDT, industries can develop scalable, cost-effective, intelligent testing and maintenance solutions that improve reliability and asset management in modern systems. Full article