Sign in to use this feature.

Years

Between: -

Subjects

remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline
remove_circle_outline

Journals

Article Types

Countries / Regions

Search Results (22)

Search Parameters:
Keywords = anterior cervical decompression and fusion

Order results
Result details
Results per page
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
11 pages, 242 KB  
Article
Preoperative Alignment and Interbody Cage Design Influence Radiographic Outcomes Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion
by Derrick Obiri-Yeboah, Zach Pennington, Hannah Levy, Abdelrahman Hamouda, Anthony L. Mikula, Kingsley Abode-Iyamah, Ian A. Buchanan, Chandan Krishna, Jeremy L. Fogelson and Benjamin D. Elder
J. Clin. Med. 2026, 15(3), 1183; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15031183 - 3 Feb 2026
Viewed by 684
Abstract
Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a widely performed procedure for treating degenerative cervical spine conditions. While it effectively addresses neural decompression and restores segmental alignment, the interplay of baseline alignment and implant-specific factors on postoperative segmental alignment remains underexplored. [...] Read more.
Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a widely performed procedure for treating degenerative cervical spine conditions. While it effectively addresses neural decompression and restores segmental alignment, the interplay of baseline alignment and implant-specific factors on postoperative segmental alignment remains underexplored. This study evaluates the influence of preoperative cervical alignment and interbody cage design on segmental alignment changes following 1- to 3-level ACDF. Methods: Following institutional review board approval, we identified 258 patients undergoing ACDF for degenerative pathology between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2023. Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were analyzed for cervical alignment, disc height, and segmental lordosis. Cage dimensions, lordosis, and positioning relative to vertebral landmarks were recorded. Multivariable linear regression models evaluated predictors of postoperative disc height, segmental lordosis, and their respective changes. Results: Postoperative disc height was positively associated with greater cage height (β = 1.13 mm per mm, p < 0.001) and negatively associated with greater cage lordosis (β = −0.10 mm per °, p = 0.001). Segmental lordosis was positively influenced by cage height (β = 0.78° per mm, p = 0.002) and lordosis (β = 0.42° per °, p = 0.002) but was negatively correlated with the distance of the cage from the anterior edge of the cranial vertebra (β = −1.76° per mm, p = 0.004). Greater preoperative segmental kyphosis predicted more significant postoperative lordosis correction (β = −1.07° per °, p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study underscores the importance of preoperative alignment and interbody cage design in achieving optimal segmental correction following ACDF. While cage height primarily drives disc height restoration, surgical technique, particularly anterior placement of the cage, is pivotal for enhancing segmental lordosis. These findings support personalized surgical planning to optimize alignment and patient outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
20 pages, 30041 KB  
Review
Dural Tear and Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage in Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: Pathophysiology, Management, and Evolving Repair Techniques
by Jae Jun Yang, Jiwon Park, Jong-Beom Park and Suo Kim
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(23), 8478; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14238478 - 29 Nov 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2905
Abstract
Dural tear (DT) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, though uncommon complications, represent a potentially serious risk of anterior cervical spine surgery, particularly in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). While the incidence in routine anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) [...] Read more.
Dural tear (DT) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leakage, though uncommon complications, represent a potentially serious risk of anterior cervical spine surgery, particularly in patients with ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL). While the incidence in routine anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or corpectomy (ACCF) is typically below 0.5%, it rises sharply to 4–32% in OPLL cases. Furthermore, it exceeds 60% when dural ossification (DO) is present. Adhesion and ossification obliterate the normal epidural plane, creating a fragile osteofibrotic interface that is highly susceptible to tearing during decompression. This review synthesizes current evidence on the pathophysiology of DT and CSF leakage in anterior cervical spine surgery, provides a framework for risk stratification, and outlines evolving techniques for successful repair and management. Intraoperative management has shifted from direct resection toward dura-preserving floating decompression and biologically reinforced multilayer repair using fascia, collagen matrix, fibrin adhesives, and polyethylene glycol (PEG) hydrogel sealants. Postoperative care emphasizes controlled CSF pressure regulation, sterile wound management, and early ambulation. Most DTs achieve successful closure with timely recognition and standardized treatment. However, persistent leakage may require escalation to composite reconstruction, epidural blood patch, or vascularized flap reinforcement. Emerging technologies such as bioactive hydrogels, 3D-printed dural scaffolds, and artificial intelligence–assisted imaging offer potential future improvements, although clinical adoption remains limited. This review summarizes current evidence on the mechanisms, risk factors, diagnostic predictors, repair strategies, and postoperative management of DT and CSF leakage, with specific attention to OPLL-related DO. A more apparent distinction between established clinical practice and emerging investigational technologies is provided to guide evidence-based decision-making. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advancements in Spine Surgery: Best Practices and Outcomes)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 4894 KB  
Review
Reoperation Strategy for Failure of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty at Index and Adjacent Levels
by Chae-Gwan Kong and Jong-Beom Park
J. Clin. Med. 2025, 14(6), 2038; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm14062038 - 17 Mar 2025
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 4614
Abstract
Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is a motion-preserving alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical degenerative disease, reducing adjacent segment degenerative disease (ASD). Despite its benefits, some patients experience CDA failure due to prosthesis-related complications, heterotopic ossification, segmental kyphosis, ASD, or [...] Read more.
Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is a motion-preserving alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical degenerative disease, reducing adjacent segment degenerative disease (ASD). Despite its benefits, some patients experience CDA failure due to prosthesis-related complications, heterotopic ossification, segmental kyphosis, ASD, or facet joint degeneration, necessitating revision surgery. Reoperation strategies depend on the failure mechanism, instability, sagittal malalignment, and neural compression. Anterior revision is suited for prosthesis failure, recurrent disc herniation, or ASD, enabling prosthesis removal, decompression, and fusion. In select cases, reimplantation may restore motion. Posterior approaches are preferred for facet degeneration, multilevel stenosis, or posterior hypertrophy, with options including foraminotomy, laminoplasty, or laminectomy and fusion. Complex cases may require combined anterior and posterior surgery for optimal decompression and stability. This narrative review outlines revision strategies, emphasizing biomechanical assessment, radiographic evaluation, and patient-specific considerations. Despite surgical challenges, meticulous planning and execution can optimize outcomes. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Advancements in Spine Surgery: Best Practices and Outcomes)
Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 1994 KB  
Article
Clinical and Radiological Outcome of Posterior Cervical Fusion Using Philips AlluraXper FD20 Angiography Suite
by Armando Dolp, Abdussalam Khamis, Javier Fandino and Jenny C. Kienzler
Brain Sci. 2025, 15(2), 160; https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci15020160 - 6 Feb 2025
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1835
Abstract
Background: Posterior cervical fusion (PCF) is widely used for cervical spinal cord decompression with/without fusion. In our hybrid operating room, intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) is routinely used to verify screw placement. This study analyzed clinical and radiological outcomes after PCF and evaluated iCT [...] Read more.
Background: Posterior cervical fusion (PCF) is widely used for cervical spinal cord decompression with/without fusion. In our hybrid operating room, intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) is routinely used to verify screw placement. This study analyzed clinical and radiological outcomes after PCF and evaluated iCT benefits for detecting screw misplacement. Methods: Nineteen patients underwent PCF between March 2012 and April 2016 for degenerative (n = 6), neoplastic (n = 7), and traumatic (n = 6) conditions. Seven patients had primary PCF, while twelve underwent PCF following anterior fusion due to segmental instability with cervical malalignment (n = 11) or tumor progression (n = 1). Results: The mean patient age was 59 ± 11 years, with 63% male patients. The median follow-up was 21 months. PCF averaged 4.74 segments (range: 1–9). At follow-up, 79% reported pain improvement and normal sensorimotor function. Of six patients with preoperative paresis, five showed improved muscle strength. No persistent gait disturbances occurred. Complications requiring revision occurred in four patients (21%): three surgical site infections and one cerebrospinal fluid leak. One perioperative death occurred (5%). iCT detected incorrect screw placement in seven patients (36%), allowing the immediate repositioning of eight screws, preventing later revision surgeries. The overall fusion rate was 92%. Conclusions: PCF with iCT is safe and effective for various cervical spine pathologies, yielding good long-term clinical outcomes. iCT effectively detects and enables immediate correction of screw malposition, reducing revision surgery needs. This imaging modality demonstrates high sensitivity and specificity for identifying clinically relevant screw malpositions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Current Research in Neurosurgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 306 KB  
Article
Long-Term Outcomes of Modified Expansive Open-Door Laminoplasty Combined with Short-Level Anterior Cervical Fusion in Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
by Szu-Wei Chen, Kuang-Ting Yeh, Cheng-Huan Peng, Chia-Ming Chang, Hao-Wen Chen, Tzai-Chiu Yu, Ing-Ho Chen, Jen-Hung Wang, Wan-Ting Yang and Wen-Tien Wu
Medicina 2024, 60(12), 2057; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60122057 - 13 Dec 2024
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 3296
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM) presents complex challenges for surgical management, particularly in patients with kyphosis or significant anterior pathology. This study aimed to assess the long-term efficacy of modified expansive open-door laminoplasty (MEOLP) combined with short-level anterior cervical [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy (MCSM) presents complex challenges for surgical management, particularly in patients with kyphosis or significant anterior pathology. This study aimed to assess the long-term efficacy of modified expansive open-door laminoplasty (MEOLP) combined with short-level anterior cervical fusion (ACF) in providing decompression, preserving alignment, and maintaining range of motion (ROM) over a nine-year follow-up. Materials and Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 124 MCSM patients treated with MEOLP combined with ACF between 2011 and 2015. MEOLP, a muscle-sparing posterior approach, was combined with ACF to correct sagittal misalignment and address anterior compression. Key outcome measures included the Pavlov ratio, C2–C7 angle, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for neck pain. Patients were monitored for adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) and other postoperative changes over the long-term follow-up. Results: At nine years post-surgery, patients demonstrated significant improvements in decompression and cervical alignment. The mean C2–C7 angle increased, reflecting enhanced lordotic curvature, while the Pavlov ratio showed maintained canal expansion. JOA scores improved significantly, indicating reduced myelopathy symptoms, and VAS scores for neck pain decreased, reflecting symptom relief. Despite these positive outcomes, ASD was noted, especially in patients with reduced preoperative disk height, highlighting the need for strategies to mitigate degeneration at adjacent segments. Conclusions: MEOLP combined with short-level ACF is a viable and durable option for managing complex MCSM cases, offering effective decompression, alignment correction, and ROM preservation. The limitations of this study, including its retrospective, single-center design and the lack of quality-of-life assessments, underscore the need for future multi-center studies with broader outcome measures. These findings support MEOLP with ACF as an alternative approach in cases where traditional laminoplasty may be insufficient. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
15 pages, 1664 KB  
Review
Evolution of Cervical Endoscopic Spine Surgery: Current Progress and Future Directions—A Narrative Review
by Chuan-Ching Huang, Jamal Fitts, David Huie, Deb A. Bhowmick and Muhammad M. Abd-El-Barr
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(7), 2122; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13072122 - 6 Apr 2024
Cited by 21 | Viewed by 7329
Abstract
Cervical endoscopic spine surgery is rapidly evolving and gaining popularity for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. This approach significantly reduces muscular damage and blood loss by minimizing soft tissue stripping, leading to less postoperative pain and a faster postoperative recovery. As [...] Read more.
Cervical endoscopic spine surgery is rapidly evolving and gaining popularity for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. This approach significantly reduces muscular damage and blood loss by minimizing soft tissue stripping, leading to less postoperative pain and a faster postoperative recovery. As scientific evidence accumulates, the efficacy and safety of cervical endoscopic spine surgery are continually affirmed. Both anterior and posterior endoscopic approaches have surfaced as viable alternative treatments for various cervical spine pathologies. Newer techniques, such as endoscopic-assisted fusion, the anterior transcorporeal approach, and unilateral laminotomy for bilateral decompression, have been developed to enhance clinical outcomes and broaden surgical indications. Despite its advantages, this approach faces challenges, including a steep learning curve, increased radiation exposure for both surgeons and patients, and a relative limitation in addressing multi-level pathologies. However, the future of cervical endoscopic spine surgery is promising, with potential enhancements in clinical outcomes and safety on the horizon. This progress is fueled by integrating advanced imaging and navigation technologies, applying regional anesthesia for improved and facilitated postoperative recovery, and incorporating cutting-edge technologies, such as augmented reality. With these advancements, cervical endoscopic spine surgery is poised to broaden its scope in treating cervical spine pathologies while maintaining the benefits of minimized tissue damage and rapid recovery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances and Challenges in Spine Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1888 KB  
Article
Restoration of Range of Motion in the Cervical Spine through Single-Segment Artificial Disc Replacement Using the Baguera®C Prosthesis
by Ming-Cheng Tsai, Ya-Fang Liu, Wei-Hsing Lin and Ming-Chung Lee
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(7), 2048; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13072048 - 2 Apr 2024
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3862
Abstract
Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a standard procedure for degenerative diseases of the cervical spine, providing nerve decompression and spinal stabilization. However, it limits cervical spine motility, restricts fused segment activity, and may lead to adjacent degeneration. Cervical disc arthroplasty [...] Read more.
Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a standard procedure for degenerative diseases of the cervical spine, providing nerve decompression and spinal stabilization. However, it limits cervical spine motility, restricts fused segment activity, and may lead to adjacent degeneration. Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is an accepted alternative that preserves the structure and flexibility of the cervical spine. This study aimed to explore the dynamic changes in the range of motion (ROM) of the cervical spine after CDA using a viscoelastic artificial disc, as well as the factors affecting mobility restoration. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 132 patients who underwent single-level anterior cervical discectomy and CDA from January 2015 to June 2022. Result: Analysis of data from 132 patients revealed a significant improvement in clinical outcomes. The mean ROM of C2–C7 and functional spinal unit (FSU) segments significantly increased from 2 to 36 months post-operatively. Cervical spine flexibility was preserved and enhanced after prosthesis implantation. However, it took six months for the cervical spine motility to stabilize. In addition, sex and age were found to impact motility restoration, with female and younger patients exhibiting larger ROMs post-surgery. Additionally, CDA at the C5–C6 level resulted in the greatest increase in ROM, potentially improving overall kinematic ability. Conclusions: Single-segment artificial disc arthroplasty effectively restores the ROM in degenerative cervical spine conditions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 12375 KB  
Technical Note
Novel Cervical Endoscopic Unilateral Laminoforaminotomy for Bilateral Decompression in Cervical Spondylosis Myeloradiculopathy: A Technical Note and Clinical Results
by Kai-Ting Chien, Yu-Cheng Chen, Ting-Kuo Chang, Yueh-Ching Liu, Lei-Po Chen, Yu-Ching Huang, Yan-Shiang Lian and Jian-You Li
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(7), 1910; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13071910 - 26 Mar 2024
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 3264
Abstract
Background: This study investigates the efficacy of the Cervical Endoscopic Unilateral Laminoforaminotomy for Bilateral Decompression (CE-ULFBD) technique in treating cervical myeloradiculopathy, primarily caused by degenerative spondylosis. Traditionally managed through multisegmental anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or laminoplasty combined with foraminotomy, this [...] Read more.
Background: This study investigates the efficacy of the Cervical Endoscopic Unilateral Laminoforaminotomy for Bilateral Decompression (CE-ULFBD) technique in treating cervical myeloradiculopathy, primarily caused by degenerative spondylosis. Traditionally managed through multisegmental anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or laminoplasty combined with foraminotomy, this condition has recently experienced a promising shift towards minimally invasive approaches, particularly endoscopic spinal decompression. While empirical evidence is still emerging, these techniques show potential for effective treatment. Method: The objective was to evaluate the outcomes of CE-ULFBD in achieving single or multilevel bilateral foraminal and central decompression, emphasizing the reduction of injury to posterior cervical muscles and the associated postoperative neck soreness common in conventional procedures. This paper delineates the surgical procedures involved in CE-ULFBD and presents the clinical outcomes of nine patients diagnosed with myeloradiculopathy due to severe cervical stenosis. Result: Assessments were conducted using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for neck and arm pain and the Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association scale (mJOA) for the activity measurement of daily living. Results indicated a considerable decrease in pain levels according to the VAS, coupled with significant improvements in functional capacities as measured by the mJOA scale. Additionally, no major postoperative complications were noted during the follow-up period. Conclusion: The study concludes that CE-ULFBD is a safe and effective approach for the treatment of cervical myeloradiculopathy resulting from severe cervical stenosis, offering a viable and less invasive alternative to traditional decompressive surgeries. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Spine Surgery – from Basics to Advances Technology)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 275 KB  
Article
Impact of Preoperative Frailty on Outcomes in Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy Undergoing Anterior vs. Posterior Cervical Surgery
by Aladine A. Elsamadicy, Sumaiya Sayeed, Josiah J. Z. Sherman, Samuel Craft, Benjamin C. Reeves, Sheng-Fu Larry Lo, John H. Shin and Daniel M. Sciubba
J. Clin. Med. 2024, 13(1), 114; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13010114 - 25 Dec 2023
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 2650
Abstract
Introduction: Frailty has been shown to negatively influence patient outcomes across many disease processes, including in the cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) population. The aim of this study was to assess the impact that frailty has on patients with CSM who undergo anterior [...] Read more.
Introduction: Frailty has been shown to negatively influence patient outcomes across many disease processes, including in the cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) population. The aim of this study was to assess the impact that frailty has on patients with CSM who undergo anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) or posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF). Materials and Methods: A retrospective cohort study was performed using the 2016–2019 national inpatient sample. Adult patients (≥18 years old) undergoing ACDF only or PCDF only for CSM were identified using ICD codes. The patients were categorized based on receipt of ACDF or PCDF and pre-operative frailty status using the 11-item modified frailty index (mFI-11): pre-Frail (mFI = 1), frail (mFI = 2), or severely frail (mFI ≥ 3). Patient demographics, comorbidities, operative characteristics, perioperative adverse events (AEs), and healthcare resource utilization were assessed. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify independent predictors of extended length of stay (LOS) and non-routine discharge (NRD). Results: A total of 37,990 patients were identified, of which 16,665 (43.9%) were in the pre-frail cohort, 12,985 (34.2%) were in the frail cohort, and 8340 (22.0%) were in the severely frail cohort. The prevalence of many comorbidities varied significantly between frailty cohorts. Across all three frailty cohorts, the incidence of AEs was greater in patients who underwent PCDF, with dysphagia being significantly more common in patients who underwent ACDF. Additionally, the rate of adverse events significantly increased between ACDF and PCDF with respect to increasing frailty (p < 0.001). Regarding healthcare resource utilization, LOS and rate of NRD were significantly greater in patients who underwent PCDF in all three frailty cohorts, with these metrics increasing with frailty in both ACDF and PCDF cohorts (LOS: p < 0.001); NRD: p < 0.001). On a multivariate analysis of patients who underwent ACDF, frailty and severe frailty were found to be independent predictors of extended LOS [(frail) OR: 1.39, p < 0.001; (severely frail) OR: 2.25, p < 0.001] and NRD [(frail) OR: 1.49, p < 0.001; (severely frail) OR: 2.22, p < 0.001]. Similarly, in patients who underwent PCDF, frailty and severe frailty were found to be independent predictors of extended LOS [(frail) OR: 1.58, p < 0.001; (severely frail) OR: 2.45, p < 0.001] and NRD [(frail) OR: 1.55, p < 0.001; (severely frail) OR: 1.63, p < 0.001]. Conclusions: Our study suggests that preoperative frailty may impact outcomes after surgical treatment for CSM, with more frail patients having greater health care utilization and a higher rate of adverse events. The patients undergoing PCDF ensued increased health care utilization, compared to ACDF, whereas severely frail patients undergoing PCDF tended to have the longest length of stay and highest rate of non-routine discharge. Additional prospective studies are necessary to directly compare ACDF and PCDF in frail patients with CSM. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section General Surgery)
10 pages, 2170 KB  
Article
Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of a Comparative Study of Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion with Partial Pediculotomy, Partial Vertebrotomy (PPPV) Posterior Endoscopic Cervical Decompression (PECD) for Cervical Foraminal Pathology
by Hyeun Sung Kim, Pang Hung Wu, Brian Zhao Jie Chin and Il Tae Jang
Medicina 2023, 59(7), 1222; https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59071222 - 29 Jun 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2741
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The purpose was to compaSre medium-term clinical and radiological outcomes of Partial Pediculotomy, Partial Vertebrotomy (PPPV) Posterior Endoscopic Cervical Decompression (PECD) surgery versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) for patients with cervical disc herniations and foraminal pathologies. Materials [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: The purpose was to compaSre medium-term clinical and radiological outcomes of Partial Pediculotomy, Partial Vertebrotomy (PPPV) Posterior Endoscopic Cervical Decompression (PECD) surgery versus Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) for patients with cervical disc herniations and foraminal pathologies. Materials and Methods: A prospective registry of patients who had undergone either PPPV PECD surgery or ACDF surgery for cervical disc herniation or foraminal pathologies under a single fellowship-trained spine surgeon was performed. The baseline characteristics and operative details including complications were recorded for all included patients. The clinical outcomes evaluated include VAS, MJOA, motor score, and NDI and MacNab’s score. The radiological parameters in neutral-measured facet length, facet area, disc height, C2–C7 angle, neck tilt angle, T1 slope and thoracic inlet angle were also evaluated. Results: A total of 55 patients (29 PPPV PECD, 26 ACDF) were included, with mean follow-up periods of 21.9 and 32.3 months, respectively. Each cohort was noted to have a single case of surgical complication. Statistically significant changes of facet area (49.05 ± 14.50%) and facet length (52.71 ± 15.11%) were noted in the PPPV PECD group. At neutral alignment of the neck on a lateral X-ray, compared to ACDF, PPPV PECD had a statistically significant change in neck tilt angle (−11.68 ± 17.35°) and T1 slope angle (−11.69 ± 19.58°). Whilst both PPPV PECD and ACDF had significant improvements in VAS, MJOA and NDI postoperatively, PPPV PECD was found to be superior across all above scores at various follow-up timepoints compared to its ACDF counterparts. Conclusions: PPPV PECD surgery achieved a satisfactory radiological correction of neck alignment and significantly improved clinical outcomes at medium-term follow-up for our cohort of patients, highlighting its feasibility in treating patients with cervical disc herniations and foraminal pathologies. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Recent Advances in Endoscopic Spine Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

7 pages, 9373 KB  
Technical Note
Posterior Cervical Unilateral Biportal Endoscopic One-Block Resection Technique for Cervical Ossified Ligamentum Flavum
by Rajeesh George and Pang Hung Wu
Surg. Tech. Dev. 2023, 12(2), 80-86; https://doi.org/10.3390/std12020007 - 9 May 2023
Viewed by 2992
Abstract
Background: There is sparse literature on the technique of single-stage anterior discectomy fusion and posterior decompression and flavectomy using the biportal endoscopic technique. Methods: Single-stage anterior discectomy fusion and posterior biportal endoscopic decompression and flavectomy apply to cervical myelopathy at a single level [...] Read more.
Background: There is sparse literature on the technique of single-stage anterior discectomy fusion and posterior decompression and flavectomy using the biportal endoscopic technique. Methods: Single-stage anterior discectomy fusion and posterior biportal endoscopic decompression and flavectomy apply to cervical myelopathy at a single level with an anterior disc and posterior ossified ligamentum flavum complex. Anterior discectomy and fusion were performed in the usual fashion in the supine position, and subsequently, posterior biportal endoscopic decompression was carried out after turning the patient prone. Conclusion: Single-stage anterior discectomy fusion and posterior biportal endoscopic decompression and flavectomy are good alternatives for circumferential decompression with myelopathy Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 4023 KB  
Article
Augmented Reality Support for Anterior Decompression and Fusion Using Floating Method for Cervical Ossification of the Posterior Longitudinal Ligament
by Hiroaki Onuma, Kenichiro Sakai, Yoshiyasu Arai, Ichiro Torigoe, Masaki Tomori, Kyohei Sakaki, Takashi Hirai, Satoru Egawa, Yutaka Kobayashi, Atsushi Okawa and Toshitaka Yoshii
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(8), 2898; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082898 - 16 Apr 2023
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 4165
Abstract
Anterior decompression and fusion (ADF) using the floating method for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is an ideal surgical technique, but it has a specific risk of insufficient decompression caused by the impingement of residual ossification. Augmented reality (AR) support [...] Read more.
Anterior decompression and fusion (ADF) using the floating method for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is an ideal surgical technique, but it has a specific risk of insufficient decompression caused by the impingement of residual ossification. Augmented reality (AR) support is a novel technology that enables the superimposition of images onto the view of a surgical field. AR technology was applied to ADF for cervical OPLL to facilitate intraoperative anatomical orientation and OPLL identification. In total, 14 patients with cervical OPLL underwent ADF with microscopic AR support. The outline of the OPLL and the bilateral vertebral arteries was marked after intraoperative CT, and the reconstructed 3D image data were transferred and linked to the microscope. The AR microscopic view enabled us to visualize the ossification outline, which could not be seen directly in the surgical field, and allowed sufficient decompression of the ossification. Neurological disturbances were improved in all patients. No cases of serious complications, such as major intraoperative bleeding or reoperation due to the postoperative impingement of the floating OPLL, were registered. To our knowledge, this is the first report of the introduction of microscopic AR into ADF using the floating method for cervical OPLL with favorable clinical results. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 2903 KB  
Systematic Review
Is It Necessary to Cross the Cervicothoracic Junction in Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion for Multilevel Degenerative Cervical Spine Disease? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Honghao Yang, Jixuan Huang, Yong Hai, Zhexuan Fan, Yiqi Zhang, Peng Yin and Jincai Yang
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(8), 2806; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12082806 - 11 Apr 2023
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3011
Abstract
Background: Posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCF) is a common procedure for treating patients with multilevel degenerative cervical spine disease. The selection of lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) relative to the cervicothoracic junction (CTJ) remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of [...] Read more.
Background: Posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCF) is a common procedure for treating patients with multilevel degenerative cervical spine disease. The selection of lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) relative to the cervicothoracic junction (CTJ) remains controversial. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of PCF construct terminating at the lower cervical spine and crossing the CTJ. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed for relevant studies in the PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library database. Complications, rate of reoperation, surgical data, patient-reported outcomes (PROs), and radiographic outcomes were compared between PCF construct terminating at or above C7 (cervical group) and at or below T1 (thoracic group) in patients with multilevel degenerative cervical spine disease. A subgroup analysis based on surgical techniques and indications was performed. Results: Fifteen retrospective cohort studies comprising 2071 patients (1163 in the cervical group and 908 in the thoracic group) were included. The cervical group was associated with a lower incidence of wound-related complications (RR, 0.58; 95% CI 0.36 to 0.92, p = 0.022; 831 patients in cervical group vs. 692 patients in thoracic group), a lower reoperation rate for wound-related complications (RR, 0.55; 95% CI 0.32 to 0.96, p = 0.034; 768 vs. 624 patients), and less neck pain at the final follow-up (WMD, −0.58; 95% CI −0.93 to −0.23, p = 0.001; 327 vs. 268 patients). However the cervical group also developed a higher incidence of overall adjacent segment disease (ASD, including distal ASD and proximal ASD) (RR, 1.87; 95% CI 1.27 to 2.76, p = 0.001; 1079 vs. 860 patients), distal ASD (RR, 2.18; 95% CI 1.36 to 3.51, p = 0.001; 642 vs. 555 patients), overall hardware failure (including hardware failure of LIV and hardware failure occurring at other instrumented vertebra) (RR, 1.48; 95% CI 1.02 to 2.15, p = 0.040; 614 vs. 451 patients), and hardware failure of LIV (RR, 1.89; 95% CI 1.21 to 2.95, p = 0.005; 380 vs. 339 patients). The operating time was reasonably shorter (WMD, −43.47; 95% CI −59.42 to −27.52, p < 0.001; 611 vs. 570 patients) and the estimated blood loss was lower (WMD, −143.77; 95% CI −185.90 to −101.63, p < 0.001; 721 vs. 740 patients) when the PCF construct did not cross the CTJ. Conclusions: PCF construct crossing the CTJ was associated with a lower incidence of ASD and hardware failure but a higher incidence of wound-related complications and a small increase in qualitative neck pain, without difference in neck disability on the NDI. Based on the subgroup analysis for surgical techniques and indications, prophylactic crossing of the CTJ should be considered for patients with concurrent instability, ossification, deformity, or a combination of anterior approach surgeries as well. However, long-term follow-up outcomes and patient selection-related factors such as bone quality, frailty, and nutrition status should be addressed in further studies. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 2904 KB  
Article
Posterior Preventive Foraminotomy before Laminectomy Combined with Pedicle Screw Fixation May Decrease the Incidence of C5 Palsy in Complex Cervical Spine Surgery in Patients with Severe Myeloradiculopathy
by Yong-Ho Lee, Mahmoud Abdou, Ji-Won Kwon, Kyung-Soo Suk, Seong-Hwan Moon, You-Gun Won, Tae-Jin Lee and Byung-Ho Lee
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(6), 2227; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12062227 - 13 Mar 2023
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 5140
Abstract
C5 palsy is a frequent sequela of cervical decompression surgeries for cervical myeloradiculopathy. Although many researchers have suggested various risk factors, such as cord shifting and the correction of lordotic angles, the tethering of the C5 root beneath the narrow foramen is an [...] Read more.
C5 palsy is a frequent sequela of cervical decompression surgeries for cervical myeloradiculopathy. Although many researchers have suggested various risk factors, such as cord shifting and the correction of lordotic angles, the tethering of the C5 root beneath the narrow foramen is an independent risk factor for C5 palsy. In this study, we tried to investigate different techniques for foramen decompression with posterior cervical fusion and assess the incidence of C5 palsy with each technique depending on the order of foraminal decompression. A combined 540° approach with LMS and uncovertebrectomy was used in group 1. Group 2 combined a 540° approach with pedicle screws and posterior foraminotomy, while posterior approach only with pedicle screws and foraminotomy was used in group 3. For groups 2 and 3, prophylactic posterior foraminotomy was performed before laminectomy. Motor manual testing to assess C5 palsy, the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores were determined before and after surgery. Simple radiographs, MRI and CT scans, were obtained to assess radiologic parameters preoperatively and postoperatively. A total of 362 patients were enrolled in this study: 208 in group 1, 72 in group 2, and 82 in group 3. The mean age was 63.2, 65.5, and 66.6 years in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The median for fused levels was 4 for the three groups. There was no significant difference between groups regarding the number of fused levels. Weight, height, comorbidities, and diagnosis were not significantly different between groups. Preoperative JOA scores were similar between groups (p = 0.256), whereas the preoperative NDI score was significantly higher in group 3 than in group 2 (p = 0.040). Mean JOA score at 12-month follow-up was 15.5 ± 1.89, 16.1 ± 1.48, and 16.1 ± 1.48 for groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively; it was higher in group 3 compared with group 1 (p = 0.008) and in group 2 compared with group 1 (p = 0.024). NDI score at 12 months was 13, 12, and 13 in groups 1, 2, and 3, respectively; it was significantly better in group 3 than in group 1 (p = 0.040), but there were no other significant differences between groups. The incidence of C5 palsy was significantly lower in posterior foraminotomy groups with pedicle screws (groups 2 and 3) than in LMS with uncovertebrectomy (group 1) (p < 0.001). Thus, preventive expansive foraminotomy before decompressive laminectomy is able to significantly decrease the root tethering by stenotic lesion, and subsequently, decrease the incidence of C5 palsy associated with posterior only or combined posterior and anterior cervical fusion surgeries. Additionally, such expansive foraminotomy might be appropriate with pedicle screw insertion based on biomechanical considerations. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Clinical Challenges and Advances in Cervical Spine Surgery)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 862 KB  
Article
Prospective Comparative Study of Dysphagia after Subaxial Cervical Spine Surgery: Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy and Posterior Longitudinal Ligament Ossification
by Kyohei Sakaki, Kenichiro Sakai, Yoshiyasu Arai, Ichiro Torigoe, Masaki Tomori, Takashi Hirai, Hiroaki Onuma, Yutaka Kobayashi, Atsushi Okawa and Toshitaka Yoshii
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(5), 1774; https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12051774 - 23 Feb 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2485
Abstract
We prospectively investigated the postoperative dysphagia in cervical posterior longitudinal ligament ossification (C-OPLL) and cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) to identify the risk factors of each disease and the incidence. A series of 55 cases with C-OPLL: 13 anterior decompression with fusion (ADF), 16 [...] Read more.
We prospectively investigated the postoperative dysphagia in cervical posterior longitudinal ligament ossification (C-OPLL) and cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) to identify the risk factors of each disease and the incidence. A series of 55 cases with C-OPLL: 13 anterior decompression with fusion (ADF), 16 posterior decompression with fusion (PDF), and 26 laminoplasty (LAMP), and a series of 123 cases with CSM: 61 ADF, 5 PDF, and 57 LAMP, were included. Vertebral level, number of segments, approach, and with or without fusion, and pre and postoperative values of Bazaz dysphagia score, C2-7 lordotic angle (∠C2-7), cervical range of motion, O-C2 lordotic angle, cervical Japanese Orthopedic Association score, and visual analog scale for neck pain were investigated. New dysphagia was defined as an increase in the Bazaz dysphagia score by one grade or more than one year after surgery. New dysphagia occurred in 12 cases with C-OPLL; 6 with ADF (46.2%), 4 with PDF (25%), 2 with LAMP (7.7%), and in 19 cases with CSM; 15 with ADF (24.6%), 1 with PDF (20%), and 3 with LAMP (1.8%). There was no significant difference in the incidence between the two diseases. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that increased ∠C2-7 was a risk factor for both diseases. Full article
(This article belongs to the Section Orthopedics)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop